FOCUS. Views from the National Council on Crime and Delinquency. Attitudes of US Voters toward Prisoner Rehabilitation and Reentry Policies



Similar documents
FOCUS. Attitudes of US Voters toward Youth Crime and the Justice System. Findings in Brief

Ready for Reform? Public Opinion on Criminal Justice in Massachusetts

The Second Chance Act Frequently Asked Questions

Criminal Justice Policy Workgroup: Background Information

Californians for Safety and Justice ( commissioned the poll. Support for Criminal Justice Reforms by Party

PRISONER REENTRY THE STATE OF PUBLIC OPINION

Youth in the Juvenile Justice System: Trends and Solutions

THINKING ABOUT CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM By Daniel T. Satterberg

Current Issues in the Rehabilitation of Convicted Felons in Florida. Jessica Bratton

It s time to shift gears on criminal justice VOTER

Criminal Justice Study Consensus Questions

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE SECOND CHANCE ACT (SCA)

Release #2478 Embargoed for Print Publication: Wednesday, August 20, 2014

Facilitating Reentry of Formerly Incarcerated People: A Systemic Approach

Testimony Submitted for the Record. On behalf of the

Promoting Successful Rehabilitation and Reentry of Ex-Drug Offenders Rachel Cooper Jeanie Donovan

Reentry & Aftercare. Reentry & Aftercare. Juvenile Justice Guide Book for Legislators

Florida s Mandatory Minimum Drug Laws: Ineffective, Expensive, and Counterproductive

Potential for Change: Public Attitudes and Policy Preferences for Juvenile Justice Systems Reform Executive Summary: Washington

SENTENCING REFORM FOR NONVIOLENT OFFENSES: BENEFITS AND ESTIMATED SAVINGS FOR ILLINOIS

AB 109 is DANGEROUS. Governor Brown signed AB 109 the Criminal Justice Realignment Bill into law on April 5, 2011.

2012 Party Platforms On Criminal Justice Policy

Rehabilitation Versus Incarceration of Juvenile Offenders: Public Preferences in Four Models for Change States Executive Summary

Changing Public Attitudes toward the Criminal Justice System

SPECIAL REPORT. Reducing the Incarceration of Women: Community-Based Alternatives. Introduction. August 2006

New Hampshire Survey Results

The Murphy Roadmap: Criminal Justice Reform

Drug Offender in Georgia Prisons 1. Drug Offenders in Georgia State Prisons. Bobbie Cates. Valdosta State University

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT COMMUTATIONS AND PARDONS

(1) Sex offenders who have been convicted of: * * * an attempt to commit any offense listed in this subdivision. (a)(1). * * *

11 MS. SCHLANGER: We're going to hear. 12 next from Michael Jacobson, who is the Director of the. 13 Vera Institute of Justice, which is obviously the

CUMULATIVE SECOND YEAR COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF PIMA COUNTY S DRUG TREATMENT ALTERNATIVE TO PRISON PROGRAM REPORT

One Hundred Tenth Congress of the United States of America

Montana Legislative Services Division Legal Services Office. Memorandum

FINAL WEIGHTED FREQUENCIES

New Mexico Corrections Department (NMCD) Mike Estrada Program Manager Community Corrections

Action Items for Oklahoma

Proposition 5. Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute.

Public Law th Congress An Act

Reentry on Steroids! NADCP 2013

STATEMENT OF UNITED STATES ATTORNEY NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BEFORE THE CHARLES COLSON TASK FORCE ON FEDERAL CORRECTIONS - - -

Issue Brief: Social Economic Status/ Class Criminal Justice in the U.S.

Delaware County Treatment Court

Removal of Youth in the Adult Criminal Justice System: A State Trends Update. Rebecca Gasca on behalf of Campaign for Youth Justice

Contra Costa County: A Model for Managing Local Corrections

Minnesota County Attorneys Association Policy Positions on Drug Control and Enforcement

Texas HOPE Literacy, Inc.

Dear Students of Social Work,

ALTERNATIVES TO INCARCERATION IN A NUTSHELL

EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 83. WHEREAS, the State of New Jersey ( State ) is committed to. improving both the efficiency of governmental functions and the

Cost-Effective Justice Alaska Common Ground / Partners for Progress. Linda Mills Policy Catalysts, LLC September 18, 2010

PROPOSAL. Expansion of Drug Treatment Diversion Programs. December 18, 2007

Part I Improvements to Existing Programs

ARTICLE 1.1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Survey of San Francisco Likely November 2014 Voters Regarding Attitudes on Employee Shuttles

Crime & Homelessness

Using Proposition 47 to Reduce Convictions and Restore Rights (January 2015)

Women in the Criminal Justice System. Briefing Sheets

ENFORCEMENT AND APPLICABILITY OF SUPERVISED PROBATIONARY FREEDOM IN FINLAND

My name is Michelle Tupper. I am an attorney with Dickstein Shapiro and a board

Badger #14, Release #2 University of Wisconsin Survey Center University of Wisconsin Madison April 3, 2004

Stopping the Revolving Door for Mentally Ill Offenders in the Criminal Justice System via Diversion and Re-entry Programs

Working Paper # March 4, Prisoner Reentry and Rochester s Neighborhoods John Klofas

A PHILANTHROPIC PARTNERSHIP FOR BLACK COMMUNITIES. Criminal Justice BLACK FACTS

DEVELOPING A NATIONAL MODEL FOR PRETRIAL RISK ASSESSMENT

PAROLE/PROBATION OFFICER

Crime And Law Enforcement In America: Racial And Ethnic Differences In Attitudes Toward The Criminal Justice System

United States Chamber of Commerce Q1 Small Business Outlook Study

Getting Smart on Crime in Florida

Reducing Recidivism: Stopping the Trend of Criminal Relapse in America

Camden Proves Police And Community Can Build Mutual Trust

Speaker Sheldon Silver. Breaking New York s Addiction to Prison: Reforming New York s Rockefeller Drug Laws

As Re-reported by the Senate Judiciary--Criminal Justice Committee. 127th General Assembly Regular Session Sub. S. B. No A B I L L

IMMIGRANTS & PLEAS IN PROBLEM-SOLVING COURTS: A GUIDE FOR NONCITIZEN DEFENDANTS & THEIR ADVOCATES

Resolutions Adopted by Diocesan Convention. On Health Care, Criminal Justice Reform, and Food Security

Criminal/Juvenile Justice System Primer

Statistics on Women in the Justice System. January, 2014

TITLE 6: CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE DIVISION 1: CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON

ABA COMMISSION ON EFFECTIVE CRIMINAL SANCTIONS

Chapter 22 The Economics of Crime

/11/ CHAPTER OBJECTIVES CHAPTER OBJECTIVES CHAPTER OBJECTIVES

Erasing Your Criminal Record: How to Get a Pardon in Pennsylvania

How To Stop A Prison From Getting A Drug And Alcohol Addiction Treatment

Evaluation of the Performance of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Rehabilitation Tier Programs

2007 Innovations Awards Program APPLICATION

Alternative Sentencing in the Federal Criminal Justice System

Poverty and the Criminal Justice System

Incarcerated Parents and Their Children. Trends

Frequently Asked Questions on 2011 Criminal Justice Realignment

Rethinking Justice in Massachusetts: Public Attitudes Toward Crime and Punishment

MANDATORY MINIMUMS AND DRUG LAW

The Rhode Island Center For Law And Public Policy, Inc.

How To Stop Youth From Being In Adult Jail And Prison

Queensland DRUG REHABILITATION (NORTH QUEENSLAND COURT DIVERSION INITIATIVE) AMENDMENT ACT 2002

7034:12/83 AMERICAN BAPTIST POLICY STATEMENT ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Steven K. Bordin, Chief Probation Officer

Testimony of Marc Mauer Executive Director The Sentencing Project

State of Arizona Office of the Auditor General

Report on Adult Drug Court: eligibility, procedure, and funding Prepared for the State of Rhode Island General Assembly revised April 26, 2007

Sentencing for Impaired Driving

Transcription:

FOCUS Attitudes of US Voters toward Prisoner Rehabilitation and Reentry Policies Findings in Brief Barry Krisberg, PhD Susan Marchionna Of those polled, 74% are somewhat or very concerned about the problem of crime in their communities, and 79% are concerned or fearful about the annual release of 700,000 prisoners. By almost an 8 to 1 margin (87% to 11%), the US voting public is in favor of rehabilitative services for prisoners as opposed to a punishment-only system. Of those polled, 70% favored services both during incarceration and after release from prison. Only 14% of those polled thought that people coming out of prison were less likely to commit new crimes than they were before imprisonment. Over 50% thought the likelihood was at least the same, while 31% thought that the likelihood of new crime was greater after prison than before. By strong majorities, US voters feel that a lack of life skills, the experience of being in prison, and obstacles to reentry are major factors in the rearrest of prisoners after release. Few thought that criminality is inherent. By an overwhelming majority (82%), likely voters felt that a lack of job training was a very signi cant barrier to released prisoners avoiding subsequent crime. They also thought that medical care, the availability of public housing, and student loans are important (86%, 84%, and 83% respectively). By huge margins, those polled felt that job training, drug treatment, mental health services, family support, mentoring, and housing were all very important services that should be offered to prisoners. Less than 10% of those polled (only 2% in the case of job training) thought that these services were unimportant. Of those polled, 44% felt that planning for reentry should begin at sentencing, another 27% thought it should begin 12 months prior to release. Only 7% were not in favor of planning for reentry. When asked about pending legislation that would allocate federal dollars to prisoner reentry (The Second Chance Act), 78% were in support. Of those, almost half expressed strong support.

2 Introduction In February, 2006, NCCD commissioned Zogby International to conduct a national public opinion poll about American attitudes toward rehabilitation and reentry of prisoners into their home communities. Except where noted, the questions pertained to prisoners convicted of nonviolent crimes, such as drug or property offenses. The results of the poll showed that striking majorities favor rehabilitation as a major goal of incarceration. The public appears to recognize that our current correctional systems do not help the problem of crime, that prisoners face enormous barriers to successful reintegration to the community, and that rehabilitative services should be provided as a means of reducing crime. Method This survey of likely voters was conducted by telephone according to a methodology approved by the American Association for Public Opinion Research. Zogby uses validated weighting and sampling procedures. The sample size was 1,039 interviews drawn at random. As many as six calls were made to reach a sampled number. The margin of error is +/- 3.1 percentage points. Survey Questions 1: How concerned are you about crime in your community? 2: In 2006, 700,000 prisoners in all categories will be released from prison to their home communities. How do you feel about this situation? 26% 34% Very concerned 21% 22% Fearful Somewhat concerned Somewhat concerned Not concerned Not concerned 40% 57% One-third of likely voters (34%) are very concerned about crime in their communities, and another two in ve (40%) are somewhat concerned. In comparison, one fourth (26%) are not concerned about crime in their communities. More than one in ve respondents (22%) are fearful about this situation. More than half (55%) are somewhat concerned, while one in ve (21%) are not concerned.

3 3: Generally speaking, do you think that people who have served their time in prison for nonviolent offenses and are released back into society today are more likely, less likely, or about the same than they were before their imprisonment to commit future crimes? 14% 51% 4% 31% More likely About the same Less likely Nearly one-third of likely voters (31%) think released prisoners are more likely than they were before their imprisonment to commit future crimes. One in seven (14%) feel they are less likely to commit future crimes. A majority (52%), however, think they generally have the same likelihood after release to commit future crimes. 4: State prison systems could offer the following four alternative prison policies for people who have committed nonviolent crime. What would you prefer the state implement? Policy 1: Treat prison as punishment and do not offer rehabilitation services to people either during their time in prison or after their release. Policy 2: Make state-funded rehabilitation services available to incarcerated people while they are serving time in prison. Policy 3: Make state-funded rehabilitation services available to incarcerated people only after they have been released from prison. Policy 4: Make state-funded rehabilitation services available to incarcerated people both while they are in prison and after they have been released from prison. 2% 11% 11% 6% Punishment Services in prison Services after prison Services in and out of prison 70% A large majority (70%) prefer Policy 4, making statefunded rehabilitation services available to incarcerated people both while they are in prison and after they have been released from prison. Much fewer respondents prefer Policy 1 (11%), Policy 2 (11%), or Policy 3 (6%).

4 5: More than 60-75% of all prisoners now released from state prisons are rearrested within two years. Following are some reasons that people have given to explain why this is. Tell me whether you think each issue is a major factor, a minor factor, or not a factor in the high rate of returns to prison. When people leave prison, they have no more life skills than they had before they entered prison. The experience of prison reinforces criminal behavior. People returning to society from prison experience too many obstacles to living a crime-free life. Once a criminal, always a criminal. Over half of respondents feel that three of these reasons are major factors in the high rate of people returning to prison after they have been released. This includes nearly two in three who say that when people leave prison, they have no more life skills than they had before they entered prison (66%). Nearly three in ve say that the experience of prison reinforces criminal behavior (58%), and people returning to society from prison experience too many obstacles to living a crime-free life (57%). In contrast, one-eighth or fewer (9% to 12%) say each of these reasons is not a factor in the high rate of people returning to prison after they have been released. Respondents are much less likely to say that once a criminal, always a criminal is a major factor (21%) in the high rate of people returning to prison after they have been released. Twice as many (39%) believe this is a minor factor, although approximately the same percentage (38%) say this is not a factor at all. 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Life skills Prison experience Obstacles Once a criminal Major factor Minor factor Not a factor

5 6: The following have been barriers to reentering prisoners. Tell me if you think it is very important, somewhat important, or not important in a person s successful reintegration to society after incarceration. 7: The following are services that could be made available to people reentering society after being incarcerated. Please tell me if you think access to each is very important, somewhat important, or not important to a person s successful reintegration into society after incarceration. 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Job training Medical services Public housing Student loans Very important Somewhat important Not important Right to vote 90 80 70 60 50 Job training Drug treatment Mental health services Help for families Mentoring Housing 40 30 A vast majority (82%) say it is very important to have access to job training for a person to successfully reintegrate into society after incarceration. Pluralities of over two in ve also say it is very important to have access to medical services (48%), access to public housing (44%), and access to student loans for education (44%). Approximately two in ve (38% to 40%) say each of these items is somewhat important for a person to successfully reintegrate into society after incarceration. 20 10 0 Job training Drug treatment Mental health services Family support Very important Somewhat important Not important Mentoring Housing More than one in four (28%) feel it is very important that a person s right to vote is reinstated, and one in three (32%) say this is somewhat important. A plurality (38%), however, feel this is not important for a person to successfully reintegrate into society after incarceration. Majorities feel each of these is very important for a person to successfully reintegrate into society after incarceration. Access to job training (81%) and access to drug treatment (79%) are more likely than others to be cited as very important, while access to housing (53%) is the least likely of the six be to rated very important.

6 8: When do you think planning for an incarcerated person s reentry into society should begin? At sentencing One year prior to release Six months prior to release Upon release Never 20% 27% 1% 7% 1% 44% At sentencing One year prior Six months prior Upon release Never 9: There is a bill in the US House of Representatives and Senate called the Second Chance Act, which funds programs and services for prisoners reentering the community. Do you strongly support, somewhat support, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose this effort on the part of the federal government? Strongly support Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose 7% 7% 8% 40% Strongly support Support Oppose Strongly oppose According to respondents, planning for an incarcerated person s reentry into society should begin sooner than later. A plurality of over two in ve (44%) feel it should begin at sentencing. More than one fourth (27%) say it should begin one year prior to release, and one- fth (20%) say it should begin six months prior to a person s release. Only 7% say planning should begin upon release, and just 1% feel this should never occur. 38% Approximately four in ve (79%) support this effort, with support closely divided between strongly (41%) and somewhat (38%). In comparison, one in seven (14%) oppose the bill, while 8% are not sure.