Why Aren t More Families Buying Life Insurance?



Similar documents
WHY AREN T MORE FAMILIES BUYING LIFE INSURANCE? Matthew S. Chambers, Don E. Schlagenhauf, and Eric R. Young

The Life Insurance Demand in a Heterogeneous-Agent Life Cycle Economy

Life Insurance and Household Consumption

Human Capital Risk, Contract Enforcement, and the Macroeconomy

FATALITY CLAIMS CALCULATION OF DAMAGES. Galan T. Lund

Social Security Fundamentals

Income, Gift, And Estate Tax Planning With Life Insurance. Farhad Aghdami Williams Mullen Richmond, Virginia

Working Beyond Retirement-Age

On average, young retirees are not

What Individuals Should Plan For Retirement Risk Management

Optimal Portfolio Choice with Annuities and Life Insurance for Retired Couples

Social Security Survivor's Benefits and the Lump-Sum Death Benefit

How Family Status and Social Security Claiming Options Shape Optimal Life Cycle Portfolios

Female labor supply as insurance against idiosyncratic risk

Maximize Your Pension with Life Insurance

Life Insurance and Household Consumption

2 Voluntary retirement module specification


Liquidity Constraints in the U.S. Housing Market

Responses to Inquiries RFP Annuity Services Provider

Optimal Consumption with Stochastic Income: Deviations from Certainty Equivalence

Wealth Transfer Planning in a Low Interest Rate Environment

West Virginia Department of Public Safety Death, Disability and Retirement Fund (Plan A)

Income Sustainability through Educational Attainment

Society of Actuaries Middle Market Life Insurance Segmentation Program (Phase 1: Young Families)

Notes - Gruber, Public Finance Chapter 13 - Social Security Social Security started in 1935 in Great Depression. Asset values had fallen drastically,

EQUIVALENT BENEFITS ANALYSIS. John Smith. ABC Corporation, Inc. Human Resources Department 123 Main Street Anytown, USA

Why Do Rich People Buy Life Insurance? By Lisa L. Verdon College of Wooster. January Abstract

Economics 1011a: Intermediate Microeconomics

A Comparison of Period and Cohort Life Tables Accepted for Publication in Journal of Legal Economics, 2011, Vol. 17(2), pp

Accessing and Optimizing Pensions and Public Benefits

Online Survey of Employees Without Workplace Retirement Plans

Survivor s Benefits. If your spouse, common-law partner, parent, or guardian dies, you may be entitled to survivor s benefits.

Demographic Trends, Housing Equity, and the Financial Security of Future Retirees

The Real Business Cycle Model

AN ANNUITY THAT PEOPLE MIGHT ACTUALLY BUY

Life Cycle Asset Allocation A Suitable Approach for Defined Contribution Pension Plans

THE social security payroll tax has become SOCIAL SECURITY RULES AND MARGINAL TAX RATES

UNIVERSITY OF OSLO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

In ation Tax and In ation Subsidies: Working Capital in a Cash-in-advance model

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS ****** UPDATED FOR 55% BENEFIT ****** ****** FOR ALL SURVIVORS ******

Macroeconomic and Distributional Effects of Social Security

The Life-Cycle Motive and Money Demand: Further Evidence. Abstract

THE UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN TRINITY COLLEGE PENSION SCHEME CONSIDERATIONS WHEN TAKING A TAX-FREE LUMP SUM

Making Smart Decisions About Your Retirement Income SOCIAL SECURITY SAVVY

KIDNEY/PANCREAS REFERRAL PACKET Please attach the following information with each application.

Important Tax Information About Payments From Your TSP Account

Passing on the Good Stuff! Implementing a Roth IRA Conversion Using Life Insurance

Your Retiree Supplemental Group Term Life Insurance Handbook...

Completed by. Date. Personal Viewpoint

Social Security Benefits Workshop

Stochastic Analysis of Long-Term Multiple-Decrement Contracts

Selection of a Joint-and-Survivor Pension

SAMA Working Paper: POPULATION AGING IN SAUDI ARABIA. February Hussain I. Abusaaq. Economic Research Department. Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency

Report of the Actuary on the Annual Valuation of the Retirement System for Employees of the City of Cincinnati. Pension Report

What to Consider When Faced With the Pension Election Decision

Deciding When to Claim Social Security MANAGING RETIREMENT DECISIONS SERIES

How Much Life Insurance Do I Need?

WITHHOLDING CERTIFICATE FOR PENSION OR ANNUITY PAYMENTS

GASB STATEMENT NO. 68 REPORT FOR THE SHERIFFS RETIREMENT FUND OF GEORGIA

Cut here and give this certificate to your employer. Keep the top portion for your records. North Carolina Department of Revenue

Withholding Certificate for Pension or Annuity Payments

The Tax Treatment of Homeowners and Landlords

Withholding Certificate for Pension or Annuity Payments

Transcription:

Why Aren t More Families Buying Life Insurance? Matthew S. Chambers Towson University Don E. Schlagenhauf Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Eric R. Young University of Virginia 2014 Workshop of the Quantitative Society for Pensions and Saving(QSPS) May, 2014

Purpose of Todays Talk

Some Key Life Insurance Facts From the Survey of Consumers Finances (1998) The life insurance participation and holding levels increase monotonically in earnings, income, and wealth. A comparison of the top quintile with the bottom quintile using either earnings, income, or wealth indicates that average insurance holdings are 13.4 times larger, 11.9 times larger, and 6.33 times larger, respectively.

Percent of Households Life Insurance Facts (Continued) The participation rate for life insurance peaks in the late 60 s. 1 Life Insurance Participation by Age 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Age

Dollars Life Insurance Facts (Continued) The peak holding of life insurance occurs around age 50. 3 x 105 Average Life Insurance Holdings by Age 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Age

Life Insurance Facts (Continued) The insurance participation rate for two-worker families is 69.5 percent, while the participation rate for one-worker families is 67.7 percent. The average life insurance holdings of a one-worker family exceeds the two-worker family by $6,338. Compared to a two-worker family, a one-worker family has essentially equal earnings, income, and wealth. The average single female widow has $27,746 lower earnings, $27,000 less income, and $161,610 less wealth compared to the average one-worker family.

I) The Model Economy

The Demographic Structure Individuals, (i), live a maximum of I periods.

The Demographic Structure Individuals, (i), live a maximum of I periods. Survival probabilities depend on age and sex.

The Demographic Structure Individuals, (i), live a maximum of I periods. Survival probabilities depend on age and sex. Adults age deterministically.

The Demographic Structure Individuals, (i), live a maximum of I periods. Survival probabilities depend on age and sex. Adults age deterministically. The adult structure (p): single male, single female, and married.

The Demographic Structure Individuals, (i), live a maximum of I periods. Survival probabilities depend on age and sex. Adults age deterministically. The adult structure (p): single male, single female, and married. Martital status (m): never married, divorced, widowed, or married.

The Demographic Structure Individuals, (i), live a maximum of I periods. Survival probabilities depend on age and sex. Adults age deterministically. The adult structure (p): single male, single female, and married. Martital status (m): never married, divorced, widowed, or married. Number of children (x): zero to four children.

The Demographic Structure Individuals, (i), live a maximum of I periods. Survival probabilities depend on age and sex. Adults age deterministically. The adult structure (p): single male, single female, and married. Martital status (m): never married, divorced, widowed, or married. Number of children (x): zero to four children. Children age stochastically.

The Demographic Structure Individuals, (i), live a maximum of I periods. Survival probabilities depend on age and sex. Adults age deterministically. The adult structure (p): single male, single female, and married. Martital status (m): never married, divorced, widowed, or married. Number of children (x): zero to four children. Children age stochastically. This process leaves them in the household 20 years on average.

The Demographic Structure Individuals, (i), live a maximum of I periods. Survival probabilities depend on age and sex. Adults age deterministically. The adult structure (p): single male, single female, and married. Martital status (m): never married, divorced, widowed, or married. Number of children (x): zero to four children. Children age stochastically. This process leaves them in the household 20 years on average.

Some additional Assumptions for the Demographic Transition Matrix With divorce, the household splits into two households and a fixed sharing rule is assumed. Any children in a divorce are assigned to the female. If both parents die in a given period, the children also disappear. Individuals are only allowed to marry someone of the same age. If a male and a female both have children, the can only marry if the number of children is less than four.

What is the Result of these Assumptions? Demographics of the Simulated Economy Characteristic Percent of Population Married 68.0 Single 31.9 Divorced 14.4 Widowed 7.3 Never Married 10.2 0 Kids 76.6 1 Kid 18.8 2 Kids 4.3 3 Kids 0.2 4 Kids 0.1

The Household Household utility depends on the level of consumption, male leisure and female leisure. Utility function E 0 I β t 1 [C µ t (T m h mt ) χ t (1 µ) (T f h ft ιx t ) (1 χ t )(1 µ) ] 1 σ 1 t=1 1 σ Household Consumption C t = (1 pt + ηx t ) θ c t where 1 pt = { 1, if single 2, if married

Labor-leisure Decision h m H m = {0, [0.15, 0.98]} h f H f = {0, [0.15, 0.98 ιx]}

Household Environment The household state, s, depends on: a - beginning of period wealth position ɛ - household specific productivity shock p - adult structure m - marital status x - number of children i - age of adult members Labor Income H = (1-1 ϖ )(1-τ)wɛυ i (h m +φh f ) + 1 ϖ ϖ + 1 ϕ ϕ

Household Environment (Continued) Budget Constraint c + k + ql a + H Wealth Evolution Equations Family remains the same. a (1 + r )k Divorce a m ρ(1 + r )k, a f (1 ρ)(1 + r )k Death of Spouse Married a (1 + r )k + l a (1 + r )(k + k si ); k si age-dependent average capital for a single Inequality Constraints k, l 0

Household Environment (Continued) Aggregate Production Technology Y = K α N 1 α Profit Maximization of the Representative Agent Firm r = αk α 1 N α δ w = (1 α)k α N α Aggregate Labor and Capital N = ɛv i (h m ( ) + φh f ( ))Γ(da, dɛ, p, m, x, i) P M X I A E K = A E Goods Market Clearing aγ(da, dɛ, p, m, x, i) P M X I C + I + G = Y

The Life Insurance Firm The Life Insurance Market is a perfectly competitive market The zero profit condition A E A E P M X I 1 (1 ψ p,m,x,i ) 1 + r l Γ(da, dɛ, p, m, x, i) = q(p, m, x, i) l Γ(da, dɛ, p, m, x, i)q(p, m, x, i) l Γ(da, P M X I

I) Model Parameterization

Calibrated Parameters Calibration Parameter Value Target r 0.116 Market Clearing Eq. β 1.005 (Wealth/GDP)=3.0 µ 0.310 (Hours Worked/Time Endo.)= 0.30 χ 0.575 (Female Hours/Male Hours)=0.69

Parameters Directly Set τparameter Value Source ι 0.15 Time Use Survey φ 0.77 1999 CPS ρ 0.50 From No Fault Divorce States η 0.30 Greenwood,Guner, and Knowles(2001) θ -0.50 Greenwood,Guner, and Knowles(2001) σ 1.50 From RBC Literature α 0.36 Capital share of National Income δ 0.10 Investment/GDP ratio =0.30 Ψ 0.93 Fernández-Villaverde and Krueger(2000) σ 2 ɛ 0.01 Fernández-Villaverde and Krueger(2000) σ 2 v 0.06 Fernández-Villaverde and Krueger(2000) 65 Mandatory Retirement Age τ 0.353 Ave. Marginal Rate on Income, Payroll and 0.40 Social Security benefits as a fraction of earnings 0.60 Survivor Benefits as fraction of Deceased Partner 0.17 Welfare Benefits as fraction of average earnings p

I) Model Evaluation

Does the Model Fit the Facts under Actuarially-Fair Pricing? Actuarially-Fair Pricing means the price of life insurance is equal to the conditional probability that one adult member of the household does not survive to the next period. The wealth distribution is broadly consistent with the data (Gini = 0.74), except at the upper tail of the income distribution. The ratio of average to peak consumption, labor supply, and wealth match the data

Holdings/Income Distribution of Life Insurance by Age 4.5 4 Holdings D ata Model 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Distribution of Life Insurance by Age The peak holdings occur at age 30, while data says peak should be at age 50. The peak in the model coinsides with the peak in the present value of (average) future labor earnings. Given rising values for future earnings and the liquidity constraint, the key is using life insurance as a consumption-smoothing device.