How To Run A State Information Technology Program



Similar documents
Overview of State Procurement and

December 2013 Report No

Texas Real Estate Commission Contract Management Procedures

Telecommunications Systems Manager I (Supervisor) Essential Task Rating Results

Appendix C Department of Information Resources Deliverables-Based Information Technology Services (DBITS) Contract Sample Statement of Work

Revenue and Sales Reporting (RASR) Business Intelligence Platform

Appendix B Department of Information Resources Deliverables-Based Information Technology Services (DBITS) Contract Support Plan

GENERAL REVENUE AND GENERAL REVENUE-DEDICATED FUNDS REQUESTED $57.2 APPROPRIATED REQUESTED $50.2 $49.0 $48.7 RECOMMENDED $59.

STATE OF TEXAS CONTRACT MANAGEMENT GUIDE. Version 1.6

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD. TRS-Care Overview PRESENTED TO THE HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ARTICLE III LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD

BILL ANALYSIS. Senate Research Center S.B. 20 By: Nelson Finance 3/9/2015 As Filed

Texas.gov Process Audit

Information Technology

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS FISCAL NOTE. HOUSE BILL NO. 911 PRINTERS NO PRIME SPONSOR: Barrar

TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION, P. 1

SAMPLE. Appendix C. Department of Information Resources. Managed Services for Telecommunications Contract. Sample Statement of Work

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Texas Medicaid Program and Mental Health

RRC STAFF OPINION PERIODIC REVIEW AND EXPIRATION OF EXISTING RULES REPORT

Office of Budget and Management

Public Assistance Reporting Information System (PARIS) U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Match Report. October 1, 2013

Agency Profile Agency Fiscal Page (Gov Rec) Change Summary Agency Change Items Convert To Dedicated Funding... 9

Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) Strategic Plan

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Contract Management Handbook

HUB PROGRAM & VENDOR TIP GUIDE

Information Technology. House Appropriations Subcommittee on Information Technology February 14, 2013

Appendix D to DIR Contract No. DIR-SDD SYNNEX Corporation STATEMENT OF WORK / SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT for <DIR CUSTOMER> END USER SERVICES

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 1033

Governmental Oversight and Accountability Committee

Palm Beach County Clerk & Comptroller s Office Contracting & Purchasing Review

NUMBER PO EFFECTIVE DATE. July 1, 2015 REFERENCE/AUTHORITY. Procedure: PR APPROVED SIGNATURE

ALCOHOL/DRUG ABUSE COUNSELORS

April 27, 2011 SUSAN M. BROWNELL VICE PRESIDENT, SUPPLY MANAGEMENT. SUBJECT: Audit Report Contract Management Data (Report Number CA-AR )

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE PROCEDURE

SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN

Position Description Questionnaire

Operations Services Branch 09-Technology Services Division

I. Definitions. DFA: Mississippi Department of Finance and Administration.

Comptroller of Public Accounts. State of Texas Cooperative Purchasing Manual

Brief Description: Reorganizing and streamlining central service functions, powers, and duties of state government.

Agency 401 2/12/2015

NORTH EAST INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 8961 Tesoro Drive San Antonio, TX 78217

THE BOARD OF VISITORS OF VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY POLICY GOVERNING FINANCIAL OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT

The North Carolina Office of the State Controller. Joint Appropriations Subcommittee for General Government March 18 th, 2015

Public Use Agreement - A Guide to the Contractor Authority

NC General Statutes - Chapter 147 Article 3D 1

Reporting Requirements

Expenditures Internal Audit Report

Office of Cable Television, Film, Music, and Entertainment

STAFF AUGMENTATION REQUEST FOR QUOTE - REPOST

THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATOR

September 2014 Report No

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2016 Session

Testimony of James W. Runcie Chief Operating Officer Federal Student Aid U.S. Department of Education

STUDENT LOAN AUTHORITY

Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles Motorist Modernization Project Phase One

Cash Management and Short-Term Investing Washington State Treasurer s Office

Presentation to Joint Committee for Senate State Affairs and Health and Human Services. Executive Commissioner Thomas M. Suehs November 23, 2010

DHS IT Successes. Rationalizing Our IT Infrastructure

SOCIAL WORK LICENSING BOARD

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

NONPROFIT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SELF ASSESSMENT TOOL

State of North Carolina Office of the State Controller

Awareness of Your Disclosure Responsibilities

4.06 Consulting Services

BOND FUND Memorandum Note

MANAGEMENT 3 PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTOR. Purpose

C. Application Service Provider (ASP): Web hosting arrangement of an application for a specific agency purpose or operation.

to conduct a review of the jobs reporting verification process employed by WEDC.

State of Montana. Office Of Public Instruction IT Strategic Plan Executive Summary

FINAL BILL REPORT ESHB 1947

Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Community and Public Health Administration

Implementation Strategy

TEXAS MEDICAID: THE IMPACT OF MANAGED CARE ON MEDICAID RECIPIENTS INDEPENDENT PHARMACIES

December 2014 Report No An Audit Report on The Telecommunications Managed Services Contract at the Health and Human Services Commission

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES IT SERVICES PORTFOLIO

Information Technology Fiscal Year Budget Highlights

July 2013 Report No

Lyford CISD. Accounts Payable Manual

Annual Report FY Courtney M. Kay-Decker Director

DRIVER RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM

Chapter 211 COMMUNITY COLLEGES-AMENDMENTS. Original House Bill No. 114

Roadmap Steering Committee Meeting. Results of the 9/26/2008 Meeting

TOPIC 12 CONTRACT COST AND PRICE ANALYSIS

Please see Section IX. for Additional Information:

GLOBAL OUTSOURCING COST MODELS

Renewable Energy Solutions

Public Procurement Position Descriptions

West Texas A&M University: Review of Physical Plant Operations PROJECT SUMMARY. Summary of Significant Results

CROW WING COUNTY BRAINERD, MINNESOTA

The Project Academy Series: Contract Management and Negotiation. January 30 and 31, 2014

Texas State Library and Archives Commission. Information Technology Detail. August 26, 2010

Payroll Texas - Correctful Adjustment of Contract Period

Internal Audit Report. Lee County Port Authority: Purchasing Card Compliance Audit

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, D. C December 5, 2012

SALES AND USE TAX TECHNICAL BULLETINS SECTION 18

Foreign Tax ( VAT ) Reporting

The University of Texas at Tyler Office of Sponsored Research (OSR) Time and Effort Reporting Policy

Accounts Receivable Report

Managed Print Programs

Transcription:

Overview of the Department of Information Resources Cooperative Contracts and Deliverables-Based Information Technology Services Programs PRESENTED TO HOUSE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY AND OPERATION LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF February 2015

Cooperative Contracts The Cooperative Contracts (Co-op) purchasing program is administered by the Department of Information Resources (DIR) and provides statewide negotiated pricing for information technology (IT) commodity items and services, including: IT Commodities (i.e. hardware, software, personal computers, printers, etc); Staff Augmentation; and IT Services (including Deliverables-Based IT Services or DBITS). The program is authorized by Government Code, Section 2157.068, Purchase of Information Technology Commodity Items. The provision: Defines a commodity item as commercial software, hardware, or technology services other than telecommunication services, that are generally available to businesses or the public and for which a reasonable demand exists in two or more state agencies; Directs DIR to negotiate pricing for commodity items based on best value; Directs DIR to negotiate a specific price for commonly purchased commodities to the greatest extent practicable. If a vendor is selected based on a percentage discount off the list price for an item, DIR must document how the arrangement obtains the best value for the state; Authorizes DIR to adopt rules regulating state agency purchases of IT commodity items, including a requirement that state agencies purchase IT commodity items through the Co-op program; and Does not limit the dollar value of a single procurement by an agency. 2

Cooperative Contracts: Customers Customer base: State agencies are required to purchase IT commodity items through DIR s Cooperative Contracts program unless: the agency obtains an exemption from DIR; the agency obtains express prior approval from the LBB for the expenditure necessary for the purchase; or DIR certifies in writing that a commodity item is not available through the Cooperative Contracts program. Voluntary customers include: Local governments; Public K-12 and higher education entities; and Assistance organizations and other governmental entities outside of Texas. 3

Cooperative Contracts: Agency Roles Department of Information Resources: Develops statewide contracts for IT commodities and services: Posts requests for offers (RFOs) on the Electronic State Business Daily for commodities and services; Evaluates vendors responses to the RFO; Sends invitations to negotiate to vendors who DIR determines offers the best value to the state; and Awards contracts to one or more vendors after negotiating either a percentage discount off a manufacturer s suggested retail price (MSRP) or a not-to-exceed price. Monitors vendors for compliance with contract terms and conditions. Receives monthly sales reports from vendors and reviews sales history to determine overall contract usage and confirm collection of DIR s administrative fee. Serves as a vendor-customer liaison for performance related issues. 4

Cooperative Contracts : Agency Roles (continued) Customer agencies: May negotiate further discounts directly with the vendor. Purchase directly from vendors. Pay an administrative fee included in the purchase price of the good or service which is collected by vendors and remitted to DIR. Are not required to report to DIR on procurements. 5

Deliverables-Based IT Services (DBITS) Subset of the Cooperative Contracts program and is also operated under authority provided to DIR in Government Code 2157.068. Provides contracts for project related services with acceptance criteria for each deliverable in a statement of work (SOW) in nine project categories: Application Development Application Maintenance and Support Business Intelligence and Data Warehouse Enterprise Resource Planning Service Oriented Architecture Project Management Technology Upgrade/Migration and Transformation Information Technology Assessments and Planning Independent Verification and Validation 6

Deliverables-Based IT Services (DBITS) Similarities with other Cooperative Contracts: Master contracts are awarded to vendors based on submissions to RFO postings. DIR monitors vendors for compliance with contract terms and conditions. Agencies purchase directly from vendors. Vendors also collect DIR s administrative fee and remit the fee to DIR. DIR receives monthly sales reports from vendors and reviews sales history to determine overall contract usage and confirms collection of DIR s administrative fee. Differences from other Cooperative Contracts: Does not include the purchase of hardware or software. Pricing is negotiated by the agency and not DIR. Agencies are encouraged, but are not required, to submit Statements of Work (SOW) to at least three vendors. DIR limits the value of a single SOW to $10 million (including all extensions, renewals and change orders). 7

Cooperative Contracts: Sales DIR currently offers approximately 750 contracts for goods and services issued to approximately 550 vendors. This figure may vary based on contract terminations and additions of new contracts. In fiscal year 2014, the Co-op program generated $2.05 billion in sales (including $110.5 million through DBITS purchases). The program s customer base reflects the following percentage of total sales in FY 2014: 51 percent: Public K-12 and higher education 27 percent: State agencies 21 percent: Local governments 1 percent: Other customers (assistance organizations and governmental entities outside Texas) Key performance measure associated with the program: Total Contract Savings and Cost Avoidance Provided Through DIR Contracts: Compares the difference in final negotiated price for products and services with the appropriate benchmark prices from other comparable group purchasing alternatives. Measure does not reflect DBITS savings. Fiscal year 2014 performance: $274.8 million (target $260 million). Fiscal year 2013 performance: $300.9 million (target $225 million). 8

Cooperative Contracts and DBITS: Program Funding DIR charges an administrative fee which is included in the purchase price of IT commodities and services (including those procured through DBITS). Fee rates vary by contract but are capped at 2.0 percent by Rider 3, DIR Clearing Fund Account, in the 2014-15 GAA and House Bill 1 As Introduced. Average fee estimated for fiscal year 2015 is 0.65 percent. The fee revenue is collected by vendors and is deposited in the Clearing Fund as Appropriated Receipts. Clearing Fund is appropriated to the agency and supports several programs programs: Contract and Vendor Management administration of the Co-op program; Enterprise Contract Management management of DIR enterprise contracts, including Data Center, Texas.gov and telecommunication contracts; IT and Cybersecurity Services; Statewide IT Planning and Policy; Texas.gov oversight; and Indirect Administration. House Bill 1 provides $27.9 million out of the Clearing Fund for the 2016-17 biennium. Agency estimated/budgeted 2014-15 amounts include $23.5 million. 9

Contact the LBB Legislative Budget Board www.lbb.state.tx.us 512.463.1200 10