Section V: Plan Maintenance



Similar documents
Oregon Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program Plan Update Training Manual

ANNEX P HAZARD MITIGATION

Section 7.Plan Maintenance

State Mitigation Plan Review Guide. Released March 2015 Effective March 2016 FP

Section 10 Plan Monitoring and Maintenance

BASIC PLAN: Appendix 7 Disaster Recovery

Overview of Homeland Security Funding 1999 to Present National Incident Management System Mandates and Training Requirements

GIS Applications and Disaster Response and Recovery

Problems and Measures Regarding Waste 1 Management and 3R Era of public health improvement Situation subsequent to the Meiji Restoration

14 ESF 14 Long-Term Community. Recovery

This guidance represents FEMA s interpretation of a statutory or regulatory requirement. The guidance itself does not impose legally enforceable

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, KANSAS EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN. ESF14-Long Term Community Recovery

HSEM Emergency Management Director s Qualification Curriculum, Emergency Management Certification and Elected/Appointed Officials Certificate Programs

In accordance with risk management best practices, below describes the standard process for enterprise risk management (ERM), including:

Flying NZ - Aero Club Safety Management System Checklist

NAFSMA Position on Floodplain Management Issues

How to do a Comprehensive Plan Part 1-1. Purdue Land Use Team Christine E. Nolan, Chair

CASE STUDY. Jefferson County EMA Alabama Recovery Plan

Section 6: Mitigation Strategy

CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE

Section 6: Mitigation Strategy

REPORT TO CONGRESS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FY 2003 INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT GRANT PROGRAM

Federal Bureau of Investigation s Integrity and Compliance Program

Illinois IKE Disaster Recovery Program Housing Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Program (IKE-HRR) FAQS

What we learned on September 12, 2013

Risk Management & Business Continuity Manual

Flood Protection Structure Accreditation Task Force

Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Policy

Community Rating System Progress Report August 2012

Section 8 Mitigation Strategy

14 ESF 14 Long-Term Community. Recovery

Emergency Support Function #14 Long Term Community Recovery and Mitigation

Local Mitigation Planning Handbook

Draft Charter CWG Internet Governance

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES FOR GRANT COMPETITION PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT AND SUBMISSION FOR LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

WikiLeaks Document Release

Case Study A - Discussion Questions

Capital Area Council of Governments FY 2016 State Homeland Security Program Regional Grant Process

Empowering State and Local Governments To Redirect Decision-Making to Achieve Resiliency

glendale~~ CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA REPORT TO THE: Housing Authority D Successor Agency D Oversight Board D

Town of Jamestown. Long-Term Recovery Plan

Lesson 5. After a Disaster: Recovery and Hazard Mitigation Programs. Disaster Assistance

ST. JOHNS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN APRIL Appendix E. Training Program

Changes to the National Flood Insurance Program What to Expect

FEMA Grant Programmes and the Role of Elizabeth Harman

DRF 1 COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS ACTIVE IN DISASTER (COAD)

Community RiskMAP Questionnaire

At the lower level, incumbents assist local governments and individuals in obtaining disaster assistance.

State Homeland Security Strategy (2012)

ESF 14. Long-Term Community Recovery

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Business Continuity Planning Consultant Services APPENDIX C RFP STATEMENT OF WORK EXHIBITS 1-3

University of Missouri Extension Emergency Management Guidance (Updated 3/2011)

State of Utah Emergency Operations Plan. APPENDIX #1 TO ESF #11 Cultural Property

Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) Administrative Plan

Risk MAP Project Coordination Meeting: Burlington County, NJ. FEMA REGION II May 8, 2013 Westampton, New Jersey

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR A PROGRAM EVALUATOR TO EVALUATE LSC S MIDWEST LEGAL DISASTER COORDINATION PROJECT OCTOBER 28, 2015

CCHC Emergency Preparedness Gap Analysis

Arizona Department of Homeland Security

Rhode Island Emergency Management Agency

Deliverable 6: Final Implementation Evaluation Report

CAPABILITY 2: Community Recovery

ALASKA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN

Homeland Security and Emergency Management Budgets

The University of British Columbia Board of Governors

CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS PLANNING

Baseline Questionnaire

IT1T Integrated Recruitment Systems 2015

MITIGATION STRATEGY OVERVIEW

Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request; AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

Capital Area Council of Governments FY 2015 Homeland Security Program Regional Grant Process

Classification: CJIS Program Manager (UCR/Auditing) Title Code: V00681 Pay Range: 34

Draft Proposal. Annual ICANN Strategic and Operational Planning Process. Prepared for discussion by:

NIMS IMPLEMENTATION FOR HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATIONS GUIDANCE

Request for Expression of Interest (REoI)

CHAPTER EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT IN AUSTRALIAN SCHOOLS

Why does Kittitas County want to form a Flood Control Zone District?

Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General. Improvements Needed in Federal Emergency Management Agency Monitoring of Grantees

Programme Manager/Procurement Specialist. Suva. Capital Works Manager. As soon as possible. As follows

STATE AND LOCAL MITIGATION PLANNING how-to guide. identifying mitigation actions and implementation strategies

Iowa Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Commission

Focus Areas: Program/Project Management, Repetitive Loss Properties, Flood Map Modernization, Standard Business Processes.

Town of Warwick, Village of Florida, Village of Greenwood Lake and Village of Warwick MULTI JURISIDICTIONAL, MULTI HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN DRAFT

Subject: National Preparedness

Minister s Response to the

Department of Biodiversity, Earth and Environmental Science College of Arts and Sciences Graduate Student Handbook

EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTION - TWELVE ENERGY

Office of Emergency Management: Rebuilding the Organization to Strengthen Oregon s Emergency Management

THE CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE ACTION PLAN FOR DISASTER RECOVERY

13 PROPOSED REGION OF YORK EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT BY-LAW

Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) Report Southwest Florida Economic Development District

Long-Term Community Recovery & Mitigation

NEBRASKA STATE HOMELAND SECURITY STRATEGY

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS SOURCE: 55 FR 35537, Aug. 30, 1990, unless otherwise noted.

The Role of Government in a Disaster

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and Preliminary Flood Insurance Study (FIS) for New York City

Performance Indicators for Disaster Recovery

LAND USE PLANNING FOR HAZARD MITIGATION

ACADEMIC POLICY FRAMEWORK

Anchorage All-Hazard Mitigation Plan October 2004

Transcription:

Section V: Plan Maintenance Section V: Plan Maintenance Page 1 of 9

1) INTRODUCTION... 3 A) PLAN MAINTENANCE APPROACH... 3 B) FEMA REQUIREMENTS ADDRESSED IN THIS SECTION... 3 2) MONITORING... 4 3) EVALUATION... 5 4) UPDATE... 6 5) INCORPORATION INTO EXISTING PLANNING MECHANISMS... 7 6) CONTINUED PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT... 8 7) LIST OF TABLES... 9 Section V: Plan Maintenance Page 2 of 9

1) Introduction The Plan Maintenance section of New York City s 2009 Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) describes the formal process that will ensure the Plan remains an effective and relevant document. This section establishes the method and schedule for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the HMP during a five-year plan-update cycle. It also establishes how New York City will maintain community involvement in the Plan. a) Plan Maintenance Approach Incorporate hazard mitigation actions into existing planning mechanisms. Determine how mitigation projects and actions will be monitored. Establish indicators of effectiveness or success. Develop an evaluation and revision schedule to ensure the Plan is up-to-date at the end of the five-year cycle. Establish a process for public input and community involvement during the planning cycle. b) FEMA Requirements Addressed in this Section The New York City Office of Emergency Management Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (Planning Team) created the plan maintenance strategy consistent with the process and steps presented in the Federal Emergency Management Agency s (FEMA) How-To- Guide: Bringing the Plan to Life (FEMA 386-4). The following FEMA requirements are addressed in this section: Requirement 201.6(c)(4)(i): [The plan maintenance process shall include a] section describing the method and schedule of monitoring, evaluating, and updating the mitigation plan within a five-year cycle. Requirement 201.6(c)(4)(ii): [The plan shall include a] process by which local governments incorporate the requirements of the mitigation plan into other planning mechanisms such as comprehensive or capital improvement plans, where appropriate. Requirement 201.6(c)(4)(iii): [The plan maintenance process shall include a] discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. Section V: Plan Maintenance Page 3 of 9

2) Monitoring As the lead agency for the 2009 New York City HMP, the New York City Office of Emergency Management (OEM) will monitor the implementation of mitigation actions identified in the Plan. To facilitate plan maintenance, OEM will appoint a staff member to serve as New York City s Hazard Mitigation Coordinator (HMC). This staff member will be the point of contact for hazard mitigation-related issues and serve as the lead coordinator on the plan update. OEM will also maintain adequate mitigation planning staff to support the HMC in monitoring and evaluating the Plan. During the five-year planning cycle, the HMC will undertake the following initiatives: Collect annual reports from the agencies involved in implementing mitigation projects or activities identified in the Mitigation Strategy section of this Plan. Maintain and update the mitigation action table. Conduct site visits and obtain reports of completed or initiated mitigation actions to incorporate in the plan revision as needed. Research and document new natural disaster information pertaining to New York City during the planning cycle and incorporate into a revised Risk Assessment section as needed. Organize annual meetings with the Mitigation Planning Council Steering Committee (Steering Committee) to discuss relevant hazard mitigation issues, provide status updates, and discuss available grant opportunities. Organize biannual meetings with Mitigation Planning Council (MPC) members to discuss relevant hazard mitigation issues, provide status updates, and discuss available grant opportunities. Coordinate, compile, and disseminate hazard mitigation funding information and applications. Convene a meeting of the Steering Committee following a natural disaster or when funding is announced to prioritize and submit potential mitigation actions for funding. The above activities outline plan maintenance during the four years leading up to the fifth year of the planning cycle (2009 2013). Beginning in March 2013, the HMC will lead a more intensive planning effort and reconvene the Planning Team to ensure New York City has an updated HMP by the end of 2013. The HMC will be responsible for compiling, documenting, and incorporating all changes derived from the activities listed above into a revised plan document. Section V: Plan Maintenance Page 4 of 9

3) Evaluation The New York City HMP will be evaluated annually to determine the effectiveness of its projects, programs, and policies. The HMC will be responsible for scheduling and organizing the MPC and Steering Committee meetings, collecting, analyzing and incorporating annual reports, and providing revised drafts to the MPC. Each year, the HMC and Steering Committee members will assess the current version of the Plan and determine the improvements necessary for the plan update. The HMC will evaluate the Steering Committee to determine if other agencies should be added. A thorough examination of the Plan will take place during the fifth year of the process to ensure New York City has an updated HMP at the end of the planning cycle. The MPC will review the goals and action items to determine their relevance to changing situations in the City, as well as changes in state or federal policy, and to ensure they are addressing current and expected conditions. The Steering Committee will look at any changes in City resources that may influence the plan implementation (such as funding) and program changes to determine need for reassignment. The Steering Committee will review the all portions of the Plan to determine if this information should be updated or modified, given any new available data. The Steering Committee will evaluate the content of the Plan using the following criteria: Are the mitigation actions effective? Are there any changes in land development that affect mitigation priorities? Do the goals, objectives, and action items meet social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic, and environmental criteria as defined in FEMA s STAPLEE analysis? Are the goals, objectives, and mitigation actions relevant given any changes in New York City? Are the goals, objectives, and mitigation actions relevant given any changes to state or federal regulations or policy? Is there any new data that affects the Risk Assessment portion of the Plan? Section V: Plan Maintenance Page 5 of 9

4) Update The Planning Team will update the HMP every five years to reflect the results of the annual reports and on-going plan evaluation by the HMC. Throughout the planning cycle, the HMC will compile new information and incorporate it into the Plan. The HMC will also assess and incorporate recommended comments expressed by FEMA in the initial review into the plan revision. At the end of the planning cycle, the Planning Team will submit the updated Plan to the State Emergency Management Office (NYSEMO) and FEMA for review. After FEMA has approved New York City s 2014 HMP, the City will again formally adopt the Plan by Executive Order. The following table is an outline of how the Plan will be updated after the 2009 FEMA-approval: Plan Update Schedule Timeframe Participants Outcome First Quarter 2010 First quarter 2011 Second quarter 2011 First quarter 2012 Second quarter 2013 Fourth quarter 2013 First quarter 2014 First quarter 2014 Steering Committee, HMC MPC, HMC Reconvene Steering Committee to discuss mitigation action progress and possible plan improvements. Reconvene MPC to discuss progress on mitigation actions. OEM Apply for plan update grant funding. Steering Committee, HMC Steering Committee, MPC, Planning Team NYSEMO, Planning Team Reconvene Steering Committee to discuss mitigation action progress and discuss possible plan improvements. Reconvene Planning Team and begin plan update. Coordinate monthly meetings with Steering Committee. Reconvene MPC and schedule one-onones as required. Submit draft plan update to NYSEMO for review and comments. FEMA, Planning Team Submit plan to FEMA for final approval. New York City Re-adopt the FEMA-approved HMP. Table 1: Plan Update Schedule Section V: Plan Maintenance Page 6 of 9

5) Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms As part of the local capability assessment conducted during the planning process, the Planning Team and Steering Committee identified current plans, programs, policies/ordinances, and studies/reports that will augment or help support mitigation planning efforts. The Steering Committee, which will meet on an annual basis, will be the mechanism for ensuring the City integrates hazard mitigation into its future planning activities. The New York City capability assessment is located in the Mitigation Strategy Section. Following the HMP approval and adoption, the Steering Committee will work to incorporate, where applicable, the HMP into the planning mechanisms identified in Table 14 of Section 4: Mitigation Strategy. Throughout the plan maintenance cycle, the Planning Team will work to integrate hazard mitigation goals and actions into the general operations of New York City agencies. The Planning Team will work with agencies to identify opportunities as outlined below: Update work plans, policies, or procedures to include hazard mitigation concepts. Establish mitigation funding within capital and operational budgets. Issue plans, policies, executive orders, regulations, or other directives to carry out mitigation actions. Add hazard mitigation elements to redevelopment plans. Section V: Plan Maintenance Page 7 of 9

6) Continued Public Involvement New York City is dedicated to continued public involvement in the hazard mitigation planning and review process. During all phases of plan maintenance, the public will have the opportunity to provide feedback. The 2009 Plan will be maintained and available for review on the OEM website through 2013. Individuals will have an opportunity to submit comments for the Plan update at any time by email. The HMC will compile all comments and present them at the annual Steering Committee meetings where members will consider them for incorporation into the revision. To help publicize the revised plan, six months prior to the submission of the 2014 Plan update, OEM will post a notice on its website requesting feedback on an updated draft HMP. The Planning Team will hold community involvement meetings with representatives from academic institutions, the private sector, community groups, and neighboring jurisdictions. Finally, OEM will send a notice to Citizen Corps members, informing them of the Plan update. This will provide the public an opportunity to express their concerns, opinions, or ideas about any updates/changes that are proposed to the Plan. Section V: Plan Maintenance Page 8 of 9

7) List of Tables TABLE 1: PLAN UPDATE SCHEDULE... 6 Section V: Plan Maintenance Page 9 of 9