(Your name and Date) Assessment Questionnaire For the ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM (02/01/2012)



Similar documents
Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Effective for Evaluations during the Accreditation Cycle

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING GOALS AND OBJECTIVES AND ASSESSMENT PLAN

SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING Baccalaureate Study in Engineering Goals and Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California

Electrical and Computer Engineering Undergraduate Advising Manual

Assessment Plans. for. Computer Engineering Programs

ABET Criterion 3: Outcomes Met By Course Content

Preparing for an ABET Accreditation Visit: Writing the Self-Study

Computer Engineering (COE) PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOMES (10/19/09) Students completing the Computer Engineering program should be able to demonstrate:

AC : ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ACCREDI- TATION: COMPARING AACSB AND ABET

ACEN 2013 STANDARDS AND CRITERIA ASSOCIATE

The Department of Electrical Engineering

The Department of Bioengineering

Computer Engineering Undergraduate Program (CpE) Assessment report

University of Illinois Department of Computer Science Goals, Objectives, and Assessments January 2009

ACEN 2013 STANDARDS AND CRITERIA MASTER S and POST-MASTER S CERTIFICATE

The Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

ENGINEERING PHYSICS (EE)

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING

ACEN 2013 STANDARDS AND CRITERIA CLINICAL DOCTORATE

Civil & Environmental Engineering Programs Assessment Process Summary

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING

STUDENT OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT PLAN. Mechanical Engineering Program

Guidelines for Massachusetts Early Educator Preparation Programs Participating in the Early Childhood Educator Scholarships Program.

Department of Computer Science and Engineering

CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITING APPLIED SCIENCE PROGRAMS

DEPARTMENTAL PLAN FOR ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING

Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering Continuous Improvement Guide

CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITING COMPUTING PROGRAMS

ABET Accreditation. Michael K. J. Milligan, PhD, PE, CAE. Executive Director Chief Executive Officer April Copyright 2015 by ABET

Bachelor of Science in Computer Engineering (BSCoE) Essential Ideas

Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs Effective for Evaluations during the Accreditation Cycle

Proposed Change to ABET Software Engineering Program Criteria CSAB Criteria Committee, 1 March 2014

Drafting Program Educational Objectives for Undergraduate Engineering Degree Programs

OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Mechanical Engineering Program Assessment October 16, 2008 INTRODUCTION PROGRAM MISSION STATEMENT

Assessment Processes. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Fall 2014

MSc in Physics Research For students entering in 2006

Unit Plan for Assessing and Improving Student Learning in Degree Programs

AUB/FEA Electrical and Computer Engineering Department (ECE)

ABET TAC CIP Report for the Academic Year Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) Program

California State Polytechnic University. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ASSESSMENT PLAN. Spring,

Assessment of Educational Objectives in Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Programs

PSYCHOLOGY Program Equivalency Criteria

Master of Science in Engineering - Electrical Engineering Option (MSE-EE) Student Outcomes Assessment Plan (SOAP)

Mississippi Nursing Degree Programs Accreditation Standards Effective June 1, 2015

BSEE-EE Electrical Engineering Assessment Plan

Bachelor of Science in Information Technology Program Outcome Assessment

The Department of Civil Engineering

ERAU Aerospace Engineering Program Educational Objectives and Student Outcomes

Electrical and Computer Engineering

Programme name Civil Engineering, Civil Engineering with Industrial Placement

Developing a Sustainable Assessment Plan for EAC-ABET Accreditation

1.1 The mission/philosophy and outcomes of the nursing education unit are congruent with those of the governing organization.

Doctor of Philosophy in Systems Engineering

Design, conduct experiments, analyze, data, implementation strategies, recommendations findings communicated; (labs)

IHE Graduate Performance Report WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY

CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITING COMPUTING PROGRAMS

Post-graduate Programmes in Construction. Royal Institution of Chartered surveyors (RICS), Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB)

MEng Engineering Management

Sarah A. Rajala Ernest W. & Mary Ann Deavenport, Jr. Chair and Dean Bagley College of Engineering Mississippi State University Mississippi State, MS

BEng Hons Engineering Management

WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH MPH PROGRAM GUIDELINES FOR APPLIED LEARNING EXPERIENCE I AND II

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMMES. Programme name Mechanical Engineering with Foundation

2015 Financial Planning Challenge Guidelines

Royal Institution Chartered Surveyors, Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB)

ABET: Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs

Electrical Engineering (BS) - General Track

Computer Engineering (BS)

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING

COLLEGE OF NURSING Anita G. Hufft, Ph.D., R.N., Dean Room 224, S. Walter Martin Hall

Translation of Subject Curriculum (Study Plan) for Third-cycle (PhD) Education. Chemistry with specialization in Chemical Physics.

Department of Engineering Technology Assessment Progress Report Calendar Year 2011 (prepared March 2012)

TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. Introduction. 2. Degree Requirements

INDUSTRIAL CHEMISTRY

A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH FOR DEFINING AND ASSESSING PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES AND OUTCOMES

MSc Research (Human Geography):

Fundamentals of Sociology II (6 ECTS credits) Courses Type C/OECTS Conflict studies (theory course) S C 6

1. In your department: 2. In your department: 3. Your department: Page 2. nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj. nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj. nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj

Arts, Humanities and Social Science Faculty

Mechanical Engineering Program Annual Program Improvement Report

Masters in Public Administration (MPA)

GETTING READY TO WORK IN PSYCHOLOGY

PROGRAM PUBLIC INFORMATION

COLLEGE OF NURSING Anita G. Hufft, Ph.D., R.N., Dean Room 224, S. Walter Martin Hall

Plan of Improvement and Assessment for Undergraduate Engineering Programs (PIA)

9. ACADEMIC QUALITY PLANNING PROCESS AND OUTCOME ASSESSMENT

Transcription:

(Your name and Date) Assessment Questionnaire For the ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM (02/01/2012) A group of professional engineering organizations, including the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), has requested that each ABET accredited institution perform an outcomes assessment of its undergraduate programs. Since the assessment is in conjunction with our ABET accreditation, it is mandatory. Completing the questionnaire should not take you more that 30 minutes. We thank you in advance for your cooperation. The questions are presented in three parts. The first part concerns the goals of engineering education, the second part concerns your assessment of the quality of the faculty, students, facilities and institutional support, and the third part is devoted to your immediate and long-term professional goals. You are requested to encircle numerical ratings. Additional written comments on each question are strongly encouraged. I. Outcomes of the EE Program Please state the level to which you have attained the following as a result of your education at Johns Hopkins. Circle the appropriate number on the scale, and comment on particular courses or educational experiences that contributed to your development. 4 = highly developed 3 = substantially developed 2 = moderately developed 1 = slightly developed 0 = undeveloped. 1. Ability to apply knowledge of mathematics 2. Ability to apply knowledge of science 3. Ability to apply knowledge of engineering Revised EE -1-

4. Ability to design experiments 5. Ability to conduct experiment 6. Ability to analyze data 7. Ability to interpret data 8. Ability to design a system to meet desired needs 9. Ability to design a component to meet desired needs 10. Ability to design within environmental constraints Revised EE -2-

11. Ability to design within social constraints 12. Ability to design within political constraints 13. Ability to design within ethical constraints 14. Ability to design within health and safety constraints 15. Ability to design within manufacturability constraints 16. Ability to design within sustainability constraints 17. Ability to function on multidisciplinary teams Revised EE -3-

18. Ability to identify engineering problems 19. Ability to formulate engineering problems 20. Ability to solve engineering problems 21. Understanding of professional responsibility 22. Understanding of ethical responsibility 23. Ability to communicate orally 24. Ability to communicate in writing Revised EE -4-

25. Ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global context 26. Ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in an economic context 27. Ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in an environmental context 28. Recognition of the need for life-long learning 29. Ability to engage in life-long learning 30. Knowledge of the relationship between technology and society 31. Ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice Revised EE -5-

II. Advising 4 = exceeded 3 = met 2 = mostly met 1 = somewhat met 0 = not met. Please rate your level of satisfaction with the quality of advising that you received from 1. Your 1 st major department (faculty advisor, website, manuals, coordinators, etc.) on course selection 2. Your 1 st major department on post-graduation employment 3. Your 1 st major department on graduate education 4. The Engineering Advising Office (New Engineering Building) on major selection 5. The Engineering Advising Office on course selection 6. The Engineering Advising Office on post-graduation employment Revised EE -6-

7. The Engineering Advising Office on graduate education 8. The Counseling Center (Garland Hall) on major selection 9. The Career Center (Garland Hall) on post-graduation employment 10. The Career Center on graduate education 11. The Pre-Professional Advising Office on major selection 12. The Pre-Professional Advising Office on post-graduation employment 13. The Pre-Professional Advising Office on graduate education 14. JHU (overall) on course selection Revised EE -7-

15. JHU (overall) on major selection 16. JHU (overall) on post-graduation employment 17. JHU (overall) on graduate education III. Facilities 4 = exceeded 3 = met 2 = mostly met 1 = somewhat met 0 = not met. Please rate your level of agreement with the following statements: 1. The classroom facilities were adequate 2. The laboratory facilities were adequate 3. Computing facilities were adequate Revised EE -8-

4. Classrooms provided an environment conducive to learning 5. Laboratories provided an environment conducive to learning 6. Facilities were available for student-faculty interaction 7. Facilities were available for professional activities 8. Facilities were available to encourage my professional development 9. Facilities enabled me to learn how to use modern engineering tools IV. Your Plans and Miscellaneous Information A. Immediate Plans 1. a. If you plan to work - how many firms did you apply to? How many offers do you have? Revised EE -9-

b. If you plan full-time graduate study, where did you apply and where were you accepted? 2. If you now have accepted or plan to accept an offer, what is the name and location of your work or school? 3. In what area of ECE do you plan to work? 4. If you will be employed after graduation, do you plan to attend graduate school on a part-time basis? If so, in what area of study? 5. Have you taken the Fundamentals of Engineering exam, or the GRE? If so please comment on your performance. B. Long-Term Plans 1. Do you plan to become a professionally registered engineer when eligible? 2. Where do you see yourself 10 years from now? Professional Practice Engineering Management Teaching and/or research Other professions such as business, law, etc. Other (Please specify: ) Revised EE -10-

C. Miscellaneous Information 1. Were you a student member of IEEE? Why? Do you plan to continue? 2. What plans do you have for remaining in contact with Hopkins' students, faculty and staff? 3. Please give an address and email address at which you can be reached within the next year. Revised EE -11-