Central Core. 2014 Vacant Land Inventory Report GROWTH ANALYSIS TECHNICAL SERIES



Similar documents
DRAFT POLICIES COUNTY OF HALIBURTON OFFICIAL PLAN UPDATE

Section 13 Urban Residential Zones

BED AND BREAKFAST ESTABLISHMENTS PROVISIONS OF SELECTED MUNICIPALITIES

CITY OF KELOWNA BYLAW NO

9.0 Alta Vista/Faircrest Heights/Riverview Park (Key Principles)

Conducting a Land Use Inventory

STAFF REPORT. December 20, North District Community Council. Director of Community Planning - North

In addition to the terms defined in this By-law, the following terms shall have the corresponding meanings for the purposes of this Section:

St. Clair College Planning Area Introduction

2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey Summary Results

SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION

28.0 Development Permit Area #2 (Neighbourhood District)

1.0 INTRODUCTION... 2

Georgian College Neighbourhood Strategy Page 2

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda - Public Hearing Item

Brandon & Area Planning District Fringe Area Growth Strategy

Chair Jim Wideman and Members of the Planning and Works Committee. Mid-Year 2013 Region of Waterloo Industrial and Business Park Vacant Land Inventory

Iowa Smart Planning. Legislative Guide March 2011

CITY OF LEHI, UTAH GENERAL PLAN MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ELEMENT

HOUSING FOR ALL E-NEWSLETTER ISSUE 2 SUMMER 2012

NEIGHBOURHOOD DESCRIPTION

Rezoning case no. RZ15-08: Adam Development Properties, LP

Corridor Goals and Objectives

Broadhectare study 2013 profile

TOWN OF CARY CONDITIONAL USE ZONING PERMIT. 412 Rutherglen Cary, NC Rutherglen Cary, NC

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA PLANNING ACT PROCESSING FEES AND CHARGES BY-LAW (amended by 20-15)

Land Use and Zoning. Land Use Within the Port Madison Indian Reservation

Comprehensive Plan Update

7.0 GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES

I I I I I I. 8. Encourage equitable taxation and assessment policies for

Settlements Must Be Integrated with Nature

Financial Analysis for the Ambleside Centre Zoning Districts

VISION, DESIGN PRINCIPLES & OVERALL PLANNING STRATEGY

SERVICING REPORT SITE PLAN AND PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM BLOCK 53 FERRIS DRIVE PLAN 58M-379 & PART OF LOT 4, REGISTERED PLAN 622 WELLESLEY, ONTARIO

CHAPTER 15: NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN AREAS

CITY OF NORMANDY PARK MANHATTAN VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA STRATEGY AND CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN

Office of the City Auditor 2016 Annual Work Plan and Long Term Audit Plan

Draft Goals and Objectives Wadena Comprehensive Plan City of Wadena, Minnesota. Land Use Goals:

THE APPRAISAL OF REAL ESTATE 3 RD CANADIAN EDITION BUSI 330

Volume II Recommendations January 2006 City of Madison Comprehensive Plan

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY

Attachment B Policy Audit Template

ASPEN HILL Minor Master Plan Amendment

23 Glen Watford Drive - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Request for Information

TH 23 Access Management Study Richmond to Paynesville

Supplementary Report - Mimico-by-the-Lake Secondary Plan

SECTION ONE CHAPTER 2: A LAND USE PROFILE OF MANCHESTER


Edward R. Sajecki Commissioner of Planning and Building

Neighborhoods & Housing

Market Analysis for Padre Boulevard Initiative in the Town of South Padre Island, TX

Chapter 13: Implementation Plan

2012 CEEI Floor Area Methodology - Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Buildings

Philadelphia County. Land Use and Growth Management Profile

CHAPTER 6. RURAL LAND USE POLICY Modification No. 8

Wastewater & Stormwater By-law

STAFF REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

Revitalization Tax Exemptions. A Primer on the Provisions in the Community Charter

Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #1 December 8, :00 p.m.

INTRODUCTION TO ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS

Planning for the future. building a great city, great neighbourhoods

21.03 SETTLEMENT AND HOUSING

Report to Planning applications committee Item Date 6 March 2014 Head of planning services

Near West Side Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary (Revised) April 2004 City of Milwaukee DCD

Proposed Planning Incentives to Support the Replacement of Office Space in New Mixed Use Developments Draft Zoning By-law Amendments

21.04 LAND USE. Managing amenity through land use strategies

Sewer System Charges By-law

The subject matter of this report deals with the following Council Objectives

2175 Keele Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report

1.0 Former Village of Rockcliffe Park


Guiding Principles. McCauley Area Focused Urban Design Plan. 1 Connect: Chinatown and Little Italy with downtown and surrounding areas

Kitchener Growth Management Strategy. January 2009 KGMS

Comparison of Goals and Policies Between Draft Plan (November 28, 2012) and Final Draft Plan (March 20, 2013)

Maryland 1. Dependent Public School Systems (39) Maryland ranks 46th among the states in number of local governments, with 265 as of June 2002.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUMMARY OF ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS

The Lancaster Medical District Master Plan. The Lancaster Campus District 1

A-2, RURAL ESTATE-AGRICULTURE DISTRICT

On the instruction of Ros Goode & Roland Morgan, Joint Fixed Charge Receivers

5. Specific Use Regulations

Land Use Element. Introduction 2.3. A Citywide Land Use Policies 2.3. A-1 The Future Land Use Map & the Location of Zones 2.3. A-2 Uses 2.

A PPENDICES C OLLIERVILLE 2040 LAND USE PLAN UPDATE

3655 Kingston Rd - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

Kingston Rd Removal of a Holding Provision (H) Application Final Report

FOR SALE. The Friedman Building th Avenue South, Seattle Nicholas T. Gill Allan Friedman

22.01 SETTLEMENT 24/04/2014 C73

Fiscal Impact Analysis of the Annexation Proposed by the Town of Beaumont. Leduc County FINAL REPORT

WHEREAS, Santa Monica is a coastal city in a prime location, being bordered by the City of Los Angeles to the north, east and south; and

Housing Incentives Policy

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY. Staff: Claudette Grant

21.08 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. Retail

Rezoning Development Permit

AMENDED OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, VILLAGE DOCKLANDS PRECINCT, 2-46 BATMANS HILL DRIVE, DOCKLANDS

Development proposals will require to demonstrate, according to scale, type and location, that they:-

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE JOHN M. FLEMING MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND CITY PLANNER

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

Shannon Corner Service Centre, Burlington Road, New Malden, KT3 4NP

Downtown Tall Buildings Project - Consultant's Study, Public Consultation and Implementation

WARRENTON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Transcription:

Central Core 2014 Vacant Land Inventory Report GROWTH ANALYSIS TECHNICAL SERIES

INTRODUCTION As a City, Edmonton is growing. Tens of thousands of people arrive each year, and our City is providing the homes, services, and amenities they expect. Growth is occurring throughout the City as we expand our LRT networks, invest in transformational projects, support infill development, and build new communities. Part of monitoring this growth is monitoring our land, and one aspect of land development is tracking vacant land. Creating an inventory of vacant land provides a basis to examine this aspect of our land use. The detailed inventory is the first of its kind in Edmonton, and in future years will provide the foundation to analyze trends in vacant land absorption. This inventory supports objectives in The Way We Grow by: monitoring neighbourhood completion accomodating future growth supporting downtown development This report is a snapshot in time using data collected from May 2014. The report is based on the land inventory, and is the first in a series of vacant land reports. It provides a summary of vacant land in Edmonton s central core neighbourhoods at the time of analysis, and future reports will examine the current status of vacant land in Edmonton s mature, established and developing neighbourhoods. Note that this report, and future reports, can provide an overview of undeveloped land, but cannot indicate the suitability 7.0 of land for development. Other barriers such as environmental contamination or unstable geotechnical conditions may exist and present obstacles to development. A vacant lot is classified as a registered lot (serviced or unserviced) that contains no permanent structures at the time of inspection. It generally does not include land developed for parks, transportation or utility purposes. A detailed methodology can be found in the appendix of this document. Central Core Analysis Vacant lands in the Central core Edmonton s central core neighbourhoods consist of downtown and ten downtown-adjacent neighbourhoods (Figure 1). These neighbourhoods are home to approximately 80,592 residents (2014 City of Edmonton Census) and account for 2.6 percent of the City s 69,980 hectares of gross land. As of May 2014, a total of 492 vacant lots were identified within Edmonton s central core. These lots account for 1.7 percent or 31.1 ha of the central core s gross land. McCauley contains the largest share of both vacant land and lots with 6.3 ha of vacant land and a total of 141 lots. Cloverdale has smallest share of vacant land at 0.3 ha, while also containing the least amount of lots with 7 in total. Vacant Land by Neighbourhood 6.0 5.0 Area (ha) 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Central Queen Mary McCauley Oliver Boyle Street Rossdale Downtown Strathcona Garneau Riverdale Cloverdale McDougall Park Total Lots 141 25 35 89 72 32 17 35 16 23 7 1

124 St 109 St 109 St 97 St 75 St Sherbrooke Rd R V Mayfair V Capital Hill Central Core Neighbourhoods Inglewood 111 Av Westmount R V Glenora Windsor Park Central Core Belgravia Prince Rupert Queen Mary Park Oliver R V Victoria River University of Alberta 87 Av 114 St McKernan RV Walterdale Garneau Downtown Queen Alexandra Figure 1: central core neighbourhoods Vacant Land Central Inventory Core City Centre Airport Kingsway 100 Av Valley Rd Spruce Avenue Central McDougall 104 Av 101 St Rossdale Strathcona CPR Irvine Alberta Avenue McCauley Av Jasp er 95 St Boyle Street 98 Av Ritchie Parkdale Riverdale Cloverdale Cromdale R V Kinnaird Connors Rd Strathearn Bonnie Doon Edmonton Northlands Virginia Park R V Riverside Whyte Av Bellevue Forest Heights Holyrood Idylwylde King Edward Park Avonmore 0 250 500 750 metres Argyll Rd R V High Strathacona Junction 2

Vacant Land by zoning* Zoning Total Area (ha) % of Total AJ 0.86 3% CB1 1.24 4% CB2 3.94 13% CCA 0.09 <1% CMU 0.13 <1 % CNC 0.35 1% DC1 12.97 42% DC2 1.30 4% HDR 0.44 1% JAMSC 0.43 1% PU 1.30 4% RA7 2.96 10% RA8 0.53 2% RA9 0.91 3% RF1 0.21 <1% RF2 1.21 4% RF3 0.48 2% RF4 0.14 <1% RF5 0.30 1% RF6 1.25 4% RPL 0.06 <1% US 0.03 <1% TOTAL 31.14 100 *Each zone is explained in further detail on page 6. Transformational Projects Investment in major redevelopment projects within the central core has the potential to reduce the quantity of vacant land found within this sector. The West Quarters Rossdale Area (ha) 43 ha 5.31 ha Population 18,000 3,000 Timeline 5-20 yrs 8-15 yrs Zoning Trends Over one third (40%) of vacant land in the central core is zoned Direct Development Control Provision (DC1). These lots occupy 13.0 ha of land, and cover 197 lots. Of all the DC1 lots, Rossdale contains the greatest number with 66 lots. The two zones least used for vacant lots in the central core are JAMSC and RPL, and each zoning accounts for one lot and amount to a combined.49 ha. Development Opportunity Vacant lots in the central core vary in size from 42 m 2 to 25,531m 2, with a median size of 374.4 m 2. This is approximately the size of an average single-detached lot. However, in the central core many lots were adjacent to each other, which could present the opportunity for consolidation and increased development opportunity these group of lots range in size from 325.0 m 2 to 31,683.9 m 2. Of the 492 vacant lots in the central core, 94 were distinct clusters of vacant parcels representing 18.9 ha of the central cores vacant land. Of the 31.1 ha of land in the central core, 8.5 ha is zoned for residential development. Multiplying the area of each vacant lot by the maximum units each zone presents, provides an estimate of potential development opportunity. Using this method, the vacant land in the central core could allow for an additional 668 dwelling units and approximately 1,307 people. Note that this is an estimate based only on existing zoning and does not account for opportunities available through rezoning or lot consolidatons. As well, DC1 and DC2 zones were excluded from calculations. As these zones account for 46 percent of the vacant land, existing development opportunity may be higher. Of the sites currently identified as being vacant, 86 or 17 percent of these sites are noted as having current land or development applications. These range from rezoning applications to major development permits for the construction of new apartment buildings. Land Ownership While a majority of the vacant properties are privately owned, 59 government-owned properties are vacant within the central core. These properties account for 12% of all vacant properties and include 56 municipally owned properties and 3 provincial. 3

Figure central core Vacant land map Vacant2: Land Inventory 4 2 0 1 4 VA C A N T L A N D I N V E N T O RY R e p o r t 0 250 500 metres 750

Future Focus This was the first year of the vacant land inventory. Future steps include: Summary reports of vacant land in mature, established and developing neighbourhoods. On-going tracking of development trends and vacant lot absorption. Release of inventory to the Open Data Catalogue Methodology This inventory was created using a four-stepped approach. The first step was to use existing databases to create a list of potentially vacant lots. The list was then supplemented with additional data. Finally, these lots were verified through the satelite imagery platform Pictometry. The inventory was then analyzed for trends, these steps are described in further detail below. CREATING THE DATABASE Records were pulled from the SLIM land use classification system and Tax Assessment Systems databases for all files coded as vacant. Files were matched for differences and a comprehensive list that contained lands categorized as vacant in both databases was created. Information contained in this list included tax account numbers, lot size, percentage of the lot classified as vacant, and neighbourhood. ADDING INFORMATION Additional information was added to the list to allow for deeper analysis. This information included neighbourhood names, zoning, geographical information (sector, neighbourhood type, ward and traffic district), known planning applications, and whether or not multiple lots were connected. Tax assessment numbers were used in TACS to obtain an address or legal description, zoning, and to eliminate any end-dated accounts. POSSE was used to obtain addresses when only legal descriptions were given and to verify known planning applications. DATABASE VERIFICATION Addresses were put into SLIM maps and Pictometry satallite imagery to verify location, address, zoning and current develoment. As well, satellite imagery was used to confirm a lack of permantent structures on a lot, while SLIM maps was used to confirm the location and use of the parcel, and to verify that the area was not being used for park purposes. ANALYSIS The organization and analysis of the database required that data be arranged according to geographical areas as to allow for comparisons to be made amongst different areas. This required the data be compiled and sumarized in catagories, allowing for the analysis of patterns and trends between different areas of the city. 5

Zone definitions RESIDENTIAL ZONES RF1 - Single Detached Residential Zone This zone provides the opportunity for single family housing. RF2 - Low Density Infill Zone This zone provides the opportunity for retaining single family housing, while allowing some duplex development. RF3 - Small Scale Infill Development Zone This zone provides the opportunity for single family and duplex housing while allowing some apartment or row housing with up to four units. RPL - Planned Lot Residential Zone This zone provides the opportunity for single family housing on smaller lots and accessed by a rear lane. RF4 - Semi-Detached Zone This zone provides the opportunity for primarily semi-detached and duplex housing. RF5 - Row Housing Zone This zone provides the opportunity for relatively low to medium density housing, such as row houses or town houses. RF6 - Medium Density Multiple Family Zone This zone provides the opportunity for medium density housing, such as row houses or town houses that may have separate second storey units. RA7 - Low Rise Apartment Zone This zone provides the opportunity for low rise apartment buildings up to four storeys. RA8 - Medium Rise Apartment Zone This zone provides the opportunity for medium rise apartment buildings up to six storeys in height. RA9 - High Rise Apartment Zone This zone provides the opportunity for high rise apartment buildings. DIRECT CONTROL ZONES DC1 - Direct Development Control Provision This zone provides the opportunity for detailed, sensitive control of the use, development, siting and design of buildings and disturbance of land. This zone is used to establish, preserve or enhance areas of unique character or environmental concern, or areas of special interest as designated under the Historical Resources Act. DC2 - Site Specific Development Control Provision This zone provides the opportunity for direct control over a specific proposed development where the proposed mix of uses or the development regulations cannot be accommodated in a standard zone. SPECIAL AREA - DOWNTOWN This is a collection of special areas zones that apply only to the Downtown, and are listed in Section 910 of the Zoning Bylaw. These zones include the CCA, CMU, HA, HDR, JAMSC, RMU, UW, and AED zones. HDR - High Density Residential This zone provides the opportunity for high density housing with minor local commercial Uses in a predominantly residential environment where the concept of a livable urban village with a strong sense of identity and place, community activities and amenities are focused on a neighbourhood main street. JAMSC - Jasper Avenue Main Street Commercial Zone This zone provides the opportunity for at-grade, predominantly retail commercial, office and service uses suitable for the Downtown s Main Street, Jasper Avenue, and to ensure that infill developments and the retrofitting and preservation of historical and older buildings incorporate human scale design characteristics to enhance a revitalized, Main Street atmosphere. CCA - Core Commercial Arts Zone This zone provides the opportunity for high density and quality development that accommodates office, retail, service, institutional, residential, arts and entertainment Uses and meet the land use objectives for the Commercial Cultural Core. Full regulations are available through the Zoning Bylaw 12800 at www.edmonton.ca/zoningbylaw. 6

Zone definitions CMU - Commercial Mixed Use Zone This zone provides the opportunity for medium intensity development that accommodates a mix of predominantly commercial, office, institutional and business Uses as a secondary office commercial area while emphasizing retail activities, entertainment and service Uses at grade. COMMERCIAL ZONES CNC - Neighbourhood Convenience Commercial Zone This zone provides the opportunity for convenience commercial and personal service uses, intended to serve the day-to-day needs of residents within the neighbourhood. CB1 - Low Intensity Business Zone This zone provides the opportunity for low intensity commercial, office and service uses located along arterial roadways that border residential areas. CB2 - General Business Zone This zone provides the opportunity for businesses that require large sites and a location with good visibility and accessibility along, or adjacent to major public roadways. NON-RESIDENTIAL ZONES This is a collection of all non-residential zones, and includes commercial, industrial, urban service (AJ, US and PU), and agricultural and reserve zones. Residential development tends to be limited in these zones as it is not their primary purpose. AJ - Alternate Jurisdiction Zone This zones purpose is to provide for lands that do not require a Development Permit when operating under the jurisdiction of federal legislation, provincial legislation or the Constitution Act. US - Urban Services Zone This zones purpose is is to provide for publicly and privately owned facilities of an institutional or community service nature. PU - Public Utility Zone This zones purpose is provide for a system or works that is used to provide for public consumption, benefit, convenience or use such as water or steam, sewage disposal, public transportation, irrigation, drainage, fuel, electric power, heat, waste management and telecommunications. Full regulations are available through the Zoning Bylaw 12800 at www.edmonton.ca/zoningbylaw. 7