Earnings related schemes: Design, options and experience Edward Whitehouse World Bank core course Washington DC, March 2014
Objectives Primary objective: ensuring older people have a decent standard of living Secondary objectives capital markets: institutional development encourage national savings labour markets retirement decisions restructuring public finances providing funds for socially/economically targeted investments
Objectives Primary objective ensuring older people have a decent standard of living in retirement Two interpretations Adequacy : ensuring older people meet a basic standard of living Insurance/forced savings : ensuring a reasonable standard of living in retirement relative to position before retirement
Objectives and measures Adequacy: an absolute measure of living standards individual pension entitlement as a proportion of economy-wide average earnings pension level Insurance: a relative measure of living standards individual pension entitlement relative to individual earnings when working replacement rate
International experience Different degrees of emphasis on the alternative objectives of adequacy and insurance/savings Two benchmarks: universal, flat rate benefit constant replacement rate
Benchmarks Relative pension level Replacement rate 1.25 1.25 1 0.75 Earnings related 1 0.75 Basic 0.5 0.5 Earnings related 0.25 Basic 0.25 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Relative pension levels: adequacy emphasis Source: OECD Pensions at a Glance
Relative pension levels: insurance emphasis Source: OECD Pensions at a Glance
Relative pension levels: intermediate Source: OECD Pensions at a Glance
Replacement rates 100 75 50 Average for OECD countries shown: 48% 25 0
Benefit design Zero pillar: mandatory, public, adequacy Basic Resource-tested Retirement-income system First pillar: mandatory, public, mainly income replacement Second pillar: mandatory private, income replacement Third pillar: voluntary private DB Points NDC Public DC Minimum pensions Private DC Private DB
Benefit design 1 Adequacy schemes What is an adequate, minimum income for older people? depends on family structures within a society must be defined relative to living standards of rest of society (20-33% is the international norm) must be affordable; avoid shifting poverty to other groups
Benefit design 1 Types of adequacy scheme Basic scheme a flat amount per year of contributions or per year of residency paid to all older people (above a certain age) paid regardless of other income (pensions etc.) Targeted schemes set a target minimum income for all older people paid only if other income (pensions etc.) does not reach the target
Benefit design 2 Insurance schemes What should be the replacement rate objective? family support in old age non pension income (e.g., other savings, work) consumption needs in retirement are lower (e.g., costs of work, no children to support) taxes and social contributions are lower during retirement A replacement rate in the pension system of less than 100% means that the same living standard can be maintained during retirement a target of 50-60% for an average earner is appropriate
Benefit design 2 Retirement-income objective Ideal replacement rates are higher for low-income workers than for higher-income For high-income workers a ceiling on earnings that are eligible for pension benefits at the lower end of the international norm (around 125-200%) of average earnings is appropriate For low-income workers use adequacy schemes to boost replacement rates
Benefit design 2 Types of insurance scheme Earnings-related: pension value depends on number of years of contributions and individual earnings variants: pure defined benefit (DB), notional accounts, points Defined contribution: pension value depends on contributions paid in and investment returns that they earn
Benefit design 2 Country practice: mandatory schemes OECD (24) ECA (10) LAC (9) MENA (10) Public None 3 - - - DB/points 15 8 2 10 NDC 3 2 - - Private DB 3 - - - DC 5 5 8 - Source: World Bank Pensions Panorama
Some equations Defined benefit Points Notional accounts Two identities if u = x = n then a = v / k = c / A
Benefit design 2 Defined benefit schemes Target replacement rate sets the accrual rate : pension value as a percentage of individual earnings resulting from a years contributions e.g., a 60% replacement rate implies 1.5% annual accrual rate x 40 years contributions Accrual rates are best linear that means the same accrual rate for all years and at all ages
Benefit design 2 Defined benefit schemes Earnings measure: final salary used to be very common now countries have moved to lifetime average salary Explanations: improved record-keeping computerisation makes lifetime calculations easier final salary no longer needed to protect against effects of inflation between earning rights and retirement Problems of final-salary schemes: distributional effects strategic manipulation costs
Earnings measures N umber of years of earnings in pension calculation 50 45 Iceland Germany N umber of years of earnings in pension calculation 50 45 40 35 30 United States Canada Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Switzerland Hungary 40 35 30 Austria, Finland, Poland, Portugal Norway, United Kingdom Czech Republic 25 25 France 20 15 20 15 Spain, Sweden 10 10 5 5 Greece, Netherlands, Slovak Republic, Italy, Turkey 0 Pre - reform Post - reform 0 Pre - reform Post - reform
Benefit design 3 Indexation Indexation: automatic adjustment of pensions in payment to reflect changes in costs of living or standards of living not the arbitrary result of annual negotiation without adjustment, purchasing power of pension can decline quickly: indexation ensures adequacy in a dynamic sense Few countries had automatic adjustments until the 1970s then, high inflation led all industrialised countries to adopt automatic indexation
Benefit design 4 Pension eligibility age All pension systems have a normal pension eligibility age (even if people often retire earlier) There are no guiding principles as to what this should be Therefore, examine what other countries do normal pension eligibility age life expectancy at that age
Pension eligibility ages Number of OECD-34 countries 20 15 10 5 0 AUT BEL CHL (60F) EST FIN HUN JPN KOR LUX MEX NLD NZE PRT SVN SWE CHE (64F) TUR 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 Normal pensionable age, years AUS CAN DEU FRA GRC ISL ISR (64F) NOR POL SVK ESP USA CZE IRL GBR DNK ITA
Trends in life expectancy at age 65 Additional years of life expectancy Men Women 25 20 15 Highest OECD country (NOR, ICE, JPN) Highest (JPN, AUS) 25 20 15 Highest OECD country (NOR, CAN, CHE, JPN) Highest (JPN) Lowest (TUR) 10 Lowest (TUR, KOR, CZE, HUN) Lowest (SVK, TUR) 10 Lowest (TUR) 5 5 0 0 1960 1980 2000 2010 2020 2040 2050 1960 1980 2000 2010 2020 2040 2050 Source: OECD Pensions Outlook 2012
Trends in life expectancy at normal pension age Additional years of life expectancy 30 25 Highest OECD country (GRC, ITA) Men Highest (GRC LUX) Highest OECD country (ITA, JPN) Women Highest (FRA, LUX) 20 15 10 Lowest (HUN, EST, CZE) Lowest (CZE, DNK, IRL) 5 Lowest (IRL, DNK) Lowest (IRL, DNK) 0 1960 1980 2000 2010 2020 2040 2050 Source: OECD Pensions Outlook 2012 1960 1980 2000 2010 2020 2040 2050
Benefit design 4 Pension age and retirement duration Life expectancy at normal pension age, years 30 27.5 Men FRA BEL JPN Women 25 22.5 20 17.5 FRA SVK CHE SWE AUT LUX NLD PRT MEX TUR HUN GRC ISL NOR 15 60 62 65 67 68 70 JPN NZE CAN FIN AUS KOR ESP BEL DEU OECD USA POL GBR IRL CZE ITA DNK CHE SWE SVK LUX PRT KOR AUT, CAN, FIN NZE NLD ESP OECD NOR MEX DEU HUN USA AUS ISL POL IRL ITA GRC GBR TUR DNK CZE 60 62 65 67 68 70 Pensionable age
Benefit design 4 Pension eligibility age Normal pension eligibility age should depend on life expectancy across countries in one country over time Flexibility in retirement may be desirable But benefits for early retirees need to be adjusted to reflect the longer period for which they are paid
Financing pensions 1 A general principle: Adequacy pensions should be paid for from the central government budget Insurance pensions should be self-financing, that is paid for out of contributions from individual members and employers In defined-contribution, insurance pensions this is simple to achieve the contributions made by or on behalf of each individual member will automatically equal the benefits that he or she receives
Financing pensions 2 In defined-benefit and other earnings-related schemes, this is more complicated to achieve Actuarial/economic techniques can be used to show which combinations of parameters and rules are feasible Three key parameters target replacement rate pension eligibility age contribution rate
Defined contribution pensions Value of pension is not set by the government Instead, it depends on the performance of the investments into which contributions are put Outcomes are uncertain because capital markets can be volatile
Diversification It is the part of a wise man to keep himself today for tomorrow, and not venture all his eggs in one basket (Miguel de Cervantes, 1605, Don Quixote) Pay-as-you-go public pensions: sustainable rate of return = earnings growth + employment growth Funded pensions rate of return in capital market directly or indirectly affects pension value Think of pension package as a portfolio of different assets
Diversification Correlation between real earnings growth and real return on balanced * portfolio Investment United United Canada France Germany Italy Japan Sweden portfolio Kingdom States Domestic 21.2-9.7-8.6-22.0 8.3 12.4-28.2 3.5 (34.4) (66.9) (76.1) (38.1) (69.2) (58.2) (15.3) (86.1) OECD-8 16.3-26.0-14.6 1.9-15.2 8.8-11.6 4.8 (47.0) (24.2) (60.3) (93.4) (50.0) (69.7) (60.8) (83.3) Note: Balanced portfolio comprises 50% equities, 50% government bonds. Domestic includes only home capital markets, OECD-8 diversifies investments between all countries shown. Correlation coefficient and p-value in per cent
International experience Public transfers Work Capital France Hungary Germany Sweden New Zealand OECD Denmark Ireland United Kingdom Netherlands Japan Switzerland Canada Australia United States 0 25 50 75 100
Principles of pension design Adequacy ensure that all older people, regardless of their career history, have enough money to survive Self-financing Secure insurance benefits should be financed wholly from contribution revenues without support from the central budget pensions promises are sustainable and affordable pensions are protected against inflation Transparent people know what they can expect in retirement income Efficient administration is effective and costs are as low as possible avoids distorting economic choices (e.g., savings and retirement decisions) limits opportunities for gaming the system
Issues What level should the adequacy pension be? What type of adequacy pension? What type of insurance pension? What target replacement rate? What pension eligibility age?