State Bar of Texas Advanced Personal Injury Law Course



Similar documents
What to Expect When You re Expecting A Lawsuit

Computing and Extending Time; Time. The following rules apply in

Information or instructions: Defendant s Cross-claims and counterclaims PREVIEW

A Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients

SUMMARY OF CHANGES COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES

A LAWYER S CREED OF PROFESSIONALISM OF THE STATE BAR OF ARIZONA

JUROR S MANUAL (Prepared by the State Bar of Michigan)

239th DISTRICT COURT GENERAL GUIDELINES

Schedule of Forms SCHEDULE OF FORMS 3. Nil

2 California Evidence (5th), Discovery

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA.

Supreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions. (a) Discovery Methods.

RULE 39 OFFER TO SETTLE

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2013

Personal Injury Litigation

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

Case4:12-cv KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS

How To Prove Guilt In A Court Case In Texas

If you have been sued as a defendant in a civil case...keep reading.

Colorado s Civil Access Pilot Project and the Changing Landscape of Business Litigation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:07-CV-231-F

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE

PART III Discovery. Overview of the Discovery Process CHAPTER 8 KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY. Information is obtainable by one or more discovery

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

LITTLE TRAVERSE BAY BANDS OF ODAWA INDIANS

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1A Article 3 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PASCO AND PINELLAS COUNTIES, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO PA/PI-CIR

SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.

Dos and Don ts of Summary Judgment Practice

Friday 31st October, 2008.

What to Expect In Your Lawsuit

JUDICIAL BRANCH MEMORANDUM. Re: New Hampshire Superior Court Civil Rules Effective October 1, 2013

SPECIAL CIVIL A GUIDE TO THE COURT

FACT SHEET FOR JUDGE SAM SPARKS

Enrolled Copy H.B. 287

Part VIII RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY TABLE OF CONTENTS

CIVIL APPEALS PAMPHLET PRO BONO PROJECT FOR THE SPONSORED AND ADMINISTERED BY THE PRO BONO COMMITTEES FOR THE STATE BAR OF TEXAS APPELLATE SECTION

STATE OF OKLAHOMA. 2nd Session of the 53rd Legislature (2012) AS INTRODUCED

Compulsory Arbitration

Any civil action exempt from arbitration by action of a presiding judge under ORS

HOUSE BILL NO. HB0106. Medical malpractice-use of expert witnesses. A BILL. for. AN ACT relating to medical malpractice actions; providing

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM

HOUSE BILL No July 18, 2013, Introduced by Rep. Heise and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

What to Do When Your Witness Testimony Doesn t Match His or Her Declaration

PART 3 CIVIL DISTRICT COURT RULES (Revised) APROVED BY THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT IN MAY 2002

WHAT HAPPENS IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE

(2) For production of public records or hospital medical records. Where the subpoena commands any custodian of public records or any custodian of hosp

INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT. IC Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection

Civil Suits: The Process

Discovery Devices. Rule 26 requires the automatic disclosure of a host of basic information regarding the case

Litigating the Products Liability Case: Discovery

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS PART FIVE - LAW DIVISION AMENDED COURT RULES

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO. L- IN RE: MIDDLESEX ASBESTOS LITIGATION CIVIL ACTION ASBESTOS LITIGATION

TITLE I REDUCTION OF ABUSIVE LITIGATION

PLEASE NOTE: THIS POLICY WILL END EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 10, 2013 AND WILL BE REPLACED BY THE INTERACTIVE RESOLUTION POLICY ON NOVEMBER 11, 2013.

Case 1:13-cv AWI-SAB Document 41 Filed 02/20/14 Page 1 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : :

ORDER. This matter is before the Court, en banc, on the motion to adopt the Rule For Expedited

Accounting and Related Services Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures

I-2 FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS

Case 2:15-ap RK Doc 61 Filed 05/09/16 Entered 05/09/16 13:51:33 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6 NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UE Defense Counsel Guidelines

CAPITAL MURDER DEFENSE COURSE PART I TRIAL OF A CAPITAL MURDER CASE TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS PROJECT SOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE OF LAW HOUSTON, TEXAS

Justice Court Rules of Civil Procedure: Table of Contents

2014 IL App (1st) U. No IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

S.B th General Assembly (As Introduced)

RULE 42 EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE AT TRIAL

TRONOX TORT CLAIMS TRUST. Individual Review and Arbitration Procedures for Category A and Category D Personal Injury Claims

STANDARDS FOR CERTIFICATION OF LAWYERS SPECIALIZING IN PERSONAL INJURY & WRONGFUL DEATH Revised January 1, 2013

Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery.

Family Law Discovery Issues

litigating in Canada: a brief guide for U.S. clients

CLAIMS AGAINST TELEPHONE ANSWERING SERVICES: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART TWO: WHAT TO DO WHEN A CLAIM HAPPENS

BASIC CRIMINAL LAW. Joe Bodiford. Overview of a criminal case Presented by: Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer

ALL OF THE BELOW DUTIES ARE ASSUMED TO, AND MUST BE, UNDER THE DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION OF A LICENSED ATTORNEY.

No. 45TH. Plaintiff EDGEWOOD INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT files its Original Petition

IN THE COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF EDMONTON TANYA LABONTE, JESSE STECHYNSKY AND RHONDA MCPHEE. - and

FAMILY LAW PROCEEDINGS IN THE 397 th DISTRICT COURT

CLASS ACTION FAIRNESS ACT OF 2005

CIRCUIT JUDGE OLIN W. SHINHOLSER COURTROOM GUIDELINES-CRIMINAL

TEXAS DISCOVERY RULES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION

CALIFORNIA TORT FORMS FROM EXPERT LITIGATORS (1st Edition) July 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES

INFORMATION FOR FILING AND DEFENDING A CIVIL CASE IN JUSTICE COURT

Judge Steve Seider Justice of the Peace Precinct 3, Place 2 Dallas County, Texas

12/3/2015. Thomas J. Farrell Farrell and Reisinger, LLC Pittsburgh

The John Crane Decision: What It Means and What It Does Not Mean

C RIMINAL LAW O V E RVIEW OF T H E T E XAS C RIMINAL J USTICE P ROCESS

QUALIFICATIONS, PRESENTATION AND CHALLENGES TO EXPERT TESTIMONY-DAUBERT (i.e. is a DFPS caseworker an expert) PRESENTED TO:

PART V - RULES OF PRACTICE IN JUSTICE COURTS. [RULES 523 to 591. Repealed effective August 31, 2013] RULE 500. GENERAL RULES

MOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT. If you want to file a SMALL CLAIMS ANSWER

Transcription:

State Bar of Texas Advanced Personal Injury Law Course New Rules for Expedited Jury Trials: How Each Side Can Use Them Amy Witherite Dan Worthington Eberstein & Witherite, LLP Atlas, Hall & Rodriguez, LLP 3100 Monticello 818 Pecan Ave. Dallas, TX 75205 McAllen, Texas 78572 214.378.6665 956.632.8293 awitherite@ewlawyers.com dkw@atlashall.com

What Cases Are Not Covered? Cases brought under the Family Code, Tax Code, Property Code, Chapter 74 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code and barratry claims brought under Section 82.0651, Government Code are excluded; Cases which include claims for non-monetary relief (unless brought as a counter claim) are excluded; Cases in which an individual claimant s claims for monetary relief (unless brought by a counter-claimant) exceed $100,000 (inclusive of all damages, except post-judgment interest) are excluded; and Cases in which the trial court finds good cause exists to remove the case from the expedited process.

Strategic Considerations on Removing a Case from the Expedited Process Will the Plaintiff s counsel agree?: Is there a co-defendant against whom you can assert a cross-claim for non-monetary relief? (injunctive relief to preserve evidence?) No deadline on filing a motion to remove. If based on discovery, file a motion to modify discovery control plan first. Reassert motion during trial. Be prepared to offer, in writing, as much evidence or summation of evidence, as possible to make a record on what is being kept out as a result of the time limitations and why its material. Include all potential grounds supporting why good cause existed for the court to remove the case.

Discovery Overview What discovery is permitted? Requests for Disclosure Add Request for all documents and tangible items to be relied upon in proving claim or defense. Interrogatories Limited to 15 Requests for Production Limited to 15 Requests for Admission Limited to 15 Oral Depositions Aggregate limitation of 6 hours per party. May be expanded up to 10 hours per party by agreement.

Discovery Issues How can Trial Court modify? Trial Court MAY: Modify discovery control plan at anytime; Modify discovery control plan if there is newly pleaded facts or discovery added so late as to deprive the requesting party of needed discovery; and Adjust oral deposition aggregate per party limitation to prevent unfair advantage.

Discovery Issues How can Trial Court modify? Trial Court MUST: Modify discovery control plan when justice requires.

Discovery Issues Strategic Considerations: Always include a justice requires component to the motion to modify. There are no reported cases when a trial court was found to have abused its discretion in denying a motion to modify a discovery control plan based upon the mandatory justice requires component of Rule 190.5. However, none of the reported cases involve the discovery limitations set out for matters subject to Rule 169. Consider the use of the good cause factors set out in the comment to Rule 169 pertaining to the removal of a case from the expedited process. (i.e. numerosity of witnesses, complexity of issues, etc.)

Discovery Issues Strategic Considerations: Always file a motion to modify the discovery control plan as a precedent to the filing of a motion to remove. A court could find that good cause to remove a case from the process did not exist (to the extent that it is based on the discovery limitations) because a party failed to first seek a discovery modification from the trial court.

Discovery Issues Strategic Considerations: There is no limitation on: Document requests attached to a deposition notice; or Depositions on written questions. Rule 91a Motion: Draw a response and withdraw the motion more than 3 days before the hearing. Motion for No Evidence Summary Judgment. Coordinate discovery with co-parties. Discovery answers to any party s discovery can be relied upon by any other party. Split up elements of the claims/defenses.

Trial Overview Trial Setting. Upon request, a court must set a case for trial within 90 days after the end of the discovery period. Continuance. Limited to two continuances with aggregate cap of 60 days. Mediation. A court may order one ½ day mediation to be completed at least 60 days prior to trial with a fee cap of 2 x filing fee. Time for presentation of evidence. Limited to 8 hours per side ; and Court may extend to 12 hours per side.

Trial Issues Continuance. Rules 251 and 252 discuss a continuance in the context of a request from a party. It appears as if a trial court may have the inherent authority to not reach or pass a case and not violate the Rule 169 limitation. If all parties were to agree on a continuance, it appears as if there would be a waiver of error even if the requested continuance exceeded the Rule 169 limitation. Mediation. Parties can agree to vary from the Rule 169 mediation limitations.

Trial Issues Time per side limitation. The trial court has two discretionary rulings related to this issue. To what extent does each individual party constitute a separate side ; and Should the per side limitation be extended from 8 to 12 hours. The trial court may not extend the per side time beyond 12 hours without removing the case from the expedited process upon a finding of good cause.

Trial Issues Time per side limitation. Motion to Establish Per Side Trial Time Rule 169 defines side as the term is defined in Rule 233 (Preemptory Challenge Rule) Side means one or more litigants who have common interests on the matters with which the jury is concerned. Ordinarily, this decision is made after the conclusion of the voir dire. However, as the voir dire is one of the items included within the expedited process time limitation, waiting until the conclusion of the voir dire could be too late. We suggest making the motion both before and after the voir dire. Motion to Equalize Trial Time Rule 233 allows the trial court to equalize the number of preemptory strikes so that no litigant or side is given unfair advantage. It is not clear that this Rule 233 discretion follows the Rule 169 reference to the definition of side into the expedited process, but until there is more guidance, a party should consider an equalization request, to the extent permitted by Rule 169 based on a claim of unfair advantage. For both of these motions, be prepared to re-urge at any point during the trial. Rule 169 does not contain a time limitation. While Rule 233 motions are ordinarily required before jury selection, the Rule 169 limitations include everything through the closing and new arguments/evidence may be presented during trial supporting either a new definition of side or an expansion of the 8/12 hour limitation.

Trial Issues Strategic Considerations: Request that the Court not release any witness you may want to have the opportunity to recall if you have any additional time remaining; Because the Court cannot extend the per side time to beyond 12 hours, if you run out of time, be prepared to: Move to remove the case from the expedited process for good cause; As a component of the motion for removal, have prepared a written record of all of the evidence you would have offered and its materiality to you claims or defenses, if you had the necessary additional time. If necessary, be prepared to concurrently file a motion for continuance to allow for additional discovery. Consider the use of deposition transcripts which should be subject to a faster presentation for those less critical witnesses; Consider the impact on your opponent if you agree to waive formalities in the presentation of the proof.

Trial Issues Strategic Considerations: Motion to Remove Case from Expedited Process: Will other parties to the case agree? No deadline on when to file. Consider filing the motion each time facts change and support the discharge. Good Cause elements listed in Comment 3 to Rule 169 not exhaustive. Factors supporting a showing of good cause include, but are not limited to, whether there are multiple claimants whose claims aggregate over $100,000; whether a defendant has filed a compulsory counterclaim in good faith that seeks relief other than that allowed in TRCP 169(a)(1); the number of parties and witnesses; the complexity of the legal and factual issues; and whether an interpreter is necessary.

Trial Issues Strategic Considerations: If it becomes apparent that adverse witnesses are deliberately trying to exhaust your time, first seek to have the trial court instruct the opposing counsel and/or witnesses to refrain from the conduct, if ineffective, request that the Court extend the per side limitation from 8 to 12 hours, unless the 12 hour maximum has been granted or will be insufficient and if so, seek a discharge from the expedited process on the grounds that the conduct of the adverse witnesses have deprived you of the ability to present the evidence necessary for your claims or defenses. Like the other discussion related to an in trial motion, be prepared to detail all of the evidence you are being prevented from offering as a result of the conduct.

Trial Court Discretion The trial court can: Modify the discovery control plan; Adjust the oral deposition aggregate time limits; Determine which parties constitute a side ; Determine whether the per side limit should be extended from 8 to12 hours per side; Unclear if the trial court could equalize the per side time limit so that one side received 8 hours and two or more litigants constituting the other side each received some other time limitation so long as the aggregate total was 12 hours or less. Upon motion and showing of good cause, remove a case from the expedited process; Determine whether a continuance should be granted if a case is removed from the expedited process; Within the 60 day/2 continuance limitation grant an opposed motion for continuance; and Grant a continuance if a case is removed from the expedited process.

Trial Court Discretion The trial court cannot: Upon request, refuse to set a case for trial more than 90 days after the end of the discovery period. Continue a case more than 2 times and with an aggregate time limitation of 60 days; Permit discovery if Claimant has not complied with Rule 47; Refuse to reopen discovery after a case is removed from the expedited process (but it does not have to grant a continuance); Refuse to modify discovery is justice requires ; Allow more than 12 hours per side in cases retained within the expedited process; and Order a case to mediation more than once. Mediation must be completed at least 60 days before trial date, cannot be longer than ½ day or cost more than twice the filing fee.