What to Expect In Your Lawsuit
|
|
- Elfrieda McBride
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 What to Expect In Your Lawsuit A lawsuit is a marathon not a sprint. Stewart R. Albertson. There is a saying that the wheels of justice move slowly. That is as true today as when it was initially stated. A litigation case is quickly resolved if it is either settled or tried within 12 to 18 months of initially being filed (that is the equivalent of legal light-speed). The average litigation case lasts from 2 to 3 years, and sometimes longer. Pretrial discovery, motions, the Court system, the lawyers and the parties all factor into the delay. This memorandum discusses the steps of a lawsuit so that you will have some understanding of how the process works and what you can expect to occur in the coming months. Starting the Process The Initial Court Pleadings. A lawsuit begins with a complaint, in civil matters, or a petition, in probate matters (for purposes of this memorandum the term probate includes anything filed in Probate Court, including trust matters). Once the initial petition is filed, the opposing party has an opportunity to file an answer, response or objection. This set of initiating pleadings (complaint and answer for civil matters, or petition and objection for probate) must be complete before the case can get underway. Attacking the Initial Pleadings. In some cases a party may decide to attack the initial pleadings filed. This can only be done for very limited purposes. For example, a petition must state certain fundamental elements to be properly pleaded. If a certain element is missing, it can be attacked by either a demurrer or motion to strike. In most cases, even if a demurrer or motion to strike is successful, the opposing party will have the right to amend their pleadings and file them in a proper form. Therefore, most of the time demurrers and motions to strike are not necessary. But the process of filing and arguing a demurrer or motion to strike will add time and expense to the litigation. The Initial Court Hearing Probate. In probate, every petition filed receives a hearing date. The initial hearing date is usually scheduled from 30 to 60 days after the petition is filed. Very little happens at the initial hearing 1
2 date set by the Court. The initial hearing date is NOT a trial date. In fact, nothing is decided. The date is simply the first opportunity for the Court to review the Petition and determine if anyone is going to object to the petition. Under California law, anyone wanting to object to the petition can appear at the initial hearing date and place their verbal objections on the record. The court will then order that the objections be made in writing by a date certain after the hearing date. Or written objections can be filed before the initial hearing date. Either way, the hearing date will be continued to allow the parties to engage in discovery. You typically do not need to appear at the initial Court hearing because we will appear on your behalf. Of course, you are always welcome to attend every Court hearing in your matter. We will notify you when your appearance in Court is required. The Initial Hearing Date Civil Lawsuit (all non-probate Court matters). The first hearing date in a civil lawsuit is the Case Management Conference hearing. A Case Management Conference is usually scheduled for six (6) months after the initial complaint is filed. Again, this is NOT the trial date, it is just the first chance the Court has to check in with the parties and determine how much time they will need for the discovery process. You typically do not need to appear at a Case Management Conference hearing because we will appear on your behalf. Plus not much occurs at these hearings. Of course, you are always welcome to attend every Court hearing in your matter. We will notify you when your appearance in Court is required. The Discovery Process (Written Discovery and Depositions). Discovery is the processes by which we attempt to obtain information, documents, statements, and any other relevant facts pertaining to your case, some of which will be used as evidence at trial. You can think of discovery in two broad categories (1) written discovery, and (2) depositions. Written Discovery The discovery process typically starts with written discovery. Written discovery includes the following methods: Document Demands. Documents demands are served on opposing parties and require them to produce relevant documents that are in their possession or control pertaining to the lawsuit. Once a document 2
3 demand is served on an opposing party, that party has 30 days in which to respond. They may ask for an extension of time, which is routinely granted because the Court does not look kindly on refusals to grant reasonable extensions. As such, the document demand may not be responded to until 45 to 60 days after it is served. Once a response is received it may be insufficient. It may contain baseless objections or refuse to provide all relevant documents. California law requires that the parties attempt to meet and confer on such disputes, meaning that we send a letter to the opposing party outlining our problems with their response. The opposing party usually agrees to provide a supplemental response within a set period of time. Once the supplemental response is received, it may still be insufficient. If so, another meet and confer is required. If the opposition refuses to supplement their response again, then we must file a motion with the Court and ask the Court to force the opposition to respond. See the discussion of Discovery Motions listed below. Note that Document Demands may only be served on parties to the lawsuit. They are not allowed to third-party witnesses, such as banks, brokerage firms, insurance companies, healthcare providers, or any other individuals who are not parties to the lawsuit. To obtain documents from third parties requires that we issue a subpoena. See our discussion of Subpoenas below. Subpoenas Subpoenas are demands made to third-parties requiring them to hand over relevant documents or other information. Subpoenas are also used to take the deposition of non-party witnesses. When bank records or medical records are required, we will issue a subpoena to the entity that has the records. Obtaining documents through subpoenas is time consuming. For example, when requesting bank records, we are required to give a Consumer s Notice to everyone whose name is associated with the bank account. Only after each person associated with a given bank account is given time to voice an objection can we serve the subpoena on the bank. The bank then has 20 days in which to comply and produce the documents, but they rarely meet this deadline. Thus, it can take from 30 to 60 to 90 days in some cases to receive documents from a bank or any other third-party such as an insurance company or medical provider. And if the bank is located outside California (meaning they do not do business in California), then the process can take twice as long. 3
4 Interrogatories. Interrogatories are just written questions asked of the opposing party. There are two types of interrogatories Form Interrogatory (asking a set of pre-printed questions) and Special Interrogatories (attorney drafted questions). As with all other written discovery, once interrogatories are served on the opposing party they have 30 days in which to respond. Typically, extension of time is required and must be granted for a reasonable amount of time. If the responses to interrogatories are inadequate, then the meet and confer process must be used. If the opposition refuses to provide satisfactory answers, then a Motion to Compel is required to be filed with the Court. See Discovery Motions below. Requests for Admissions. Requests for admissions are unique in that they demand the opposing party to either admit or deny a given statement. They can be hard to draft because they must not be ambiguous in their language. They typically are used to admit the authenticity of documents. They can also be used to establish fundamental facts about the case. Once admitted, the fact is considered proven for all purposes at trial. If Request for Admission is denied, then the facts contained in that particular request must be proven at trial. Again, if a response is received that is insufficient, the parties must first meet and confer and then file a Motion to Compel if the response is not adequate. Discovery Motions. Once a response to discovery is received, a party only has 45 days in which to file a motion compelling additional responses if the original response is not adequate. Before a motion can be filed, the parties must meet and confer, which is usually done in a letter, but can also be done by telephone, , or fax. If the parties cannot agree by meeting and conferring on the discovery issue, then a Motion to Compel must be filed with the Court. Generally speaking, the Court disfavors Motions to Compel. One Judge has likened such motions to two kids in a sandbox. As such, parties must be certain that the items for which they are filing a Motion are important and relevant to the lawsuit. Filing a Motion for an irrelevant or unnecessary purpose is not only frowned upon by the Court, but could also subject the moving party to sanctions for bringing the motion in the first instance. Technically, the party who prevails on a Motion to Compel is awarded sanctions to compensate them for the attorneys fees they spent to bring the motion. This rarely occurs. 4
5 More often, the Court either refuses to issue sanctions whatsoever or the amount of sanctions is nominal in comparison to the actual costs of the motion. Depositions A deposition is the live questioning of a witness under oath with a Court reporter present. Depositions are typically scheduled once the written discovery is complete or near completion. Depositions can be taken of parties and third-party witnesses. Once a person has his or her deposition taken, it cannot be taken a second time without Court permission. However, there are times when a deposition cannot be completed in a single day, in which case a continuation day may be scheduled at a later time. Any party to the lawsuit has a right to attend a deposition. During your case, you may have your deposition taken. If that occurs, we will schedule a time to meet with you prior to your deposition date to prepare you for your deposition. When we are taking the deposition of an opposing party or third-party witness, we will prepare for and take the deposition. You have the right to be at all depositions if you are a party to the lawsuit, but you are not required to attend any depositions (other than your own deposition of course). Once the deposition is complete, the Court reporter will prepare a written transcript. You will have an opportunity to review your own deposition testimony and the deposition testimony of all other witnesses. At times, we may choose to video record a deposition as well. Generally, deposition testimony cannot be used at trial. However, if a witness testifies differently at trial than he did at his deposition, then that inconsistency can be read into the record. There are other limited exceptions to when deposition testimony can be used at trial. Finally, there are times when disputes arise as to what a witness can or cannot testify to at deposition. When that occurs, again, the parties must meet and confer. If an agreement is not reached, then a Motion to Compel is required. Mediation and Mandatory Settlement Conferences. At some point throughout your lawsuit the Court will either ask you or order you to attend a form of settlement conference. Sometimes, the parties will agree informally to attend a mediation in hopes of reaching a settlement. Below are two of the most common settlement conference used in civil and probate matters: 5
6 Mediation. Mediation is an informal meeting between the parties and a neutral third-party called a mediator. The mediator is usually a retired judge or a practicing lawyer with some expertise in the area of law at issue in your case. Mediations usually last a full day. The parties are placed in separate rooms and the mediator moves back and forth between the parties attempting to reach a compromise that both parties can agree to. If the parties do not voluntarily come to an agreement, then the mediation ends and the lawsuit continues in Court. In other words, mediation does not result in a forced or involuntary result or ruling. The mediator is simply trying to come to a brokered agreement not make any final or binding decisions in your case. Statistics show that around 97% of all civil and probate cases settle before trial. And a large part of that settlement occurs at mediation. There is a very good chance your case could settle at mediation or even after mediation. But your case will only settle if you agree to do so voluntarily at the mediation there is no forced settlement of cases at mediation. Your attendance at mediation is mandatory. We will inform you of any mediation in your matter before it occurs. Mandatory Settlement Conference. Different Courts handle mandatory settlement conferences (MSC) in different ways. But basically it is a conference with a Judge at the Court where a resolution is negotiated. Again, the decision to compromise a case at an MSC is voluntary and no ruling or binding decision will be made at the MSC. Your attendance at an MSC is mandatory. We will inform you of any mediation in your matter before it occurs. In San Bernardino probate court, the MSC is with the Probate Judge, the same Judge hearing your case. The Judge will take the attorneys only into his chambers and discuss the facts of the case and the possible resolutions to be made. The attorneys then meet with their respective clients and discuss the proposed resolution. This process goes back and forth until either a compromise is reached or the parties fail to reach an agreement at the end of the day (the Court usually stops the MSC at 4:30 p.m.). In Riverside, MSC s are conducted by Judge Rich, a retired Judge who is locally famous for his settlement negotiations. The parties literally wait in the Court hallway while Judge Rich goes from party to party attempting to reach a compromise. If no compromise is made, then the MSC ends and the case continues in Court as before. 6
7 Arbitration. Do not confuse arbitration with mediation. They are two very different procedures. Mediation is an informal meeting of the parties with a neutral third-party who tries to reach a voluntary compromise. Arbitration is like a mini-trial where an arbitrator makes a binding decision in your case. In other words, arbitration replaces your right to a trial in Court with either a Judge or jury (not all lawsuits are entitled to juries such as probate, trust, and will cases). We rarely, if ever, agree to voluntarily arbitrate a case. Arbitrators are allowed to make decisions without the rules of evidence, they oftentimes limit the amount of discovery that can be done (thereby impeding your ability to obtain evidence) and their decisions cannot be appealed in Court. As a result, we do not favor arbitrations. But there are times when arbitrations are required. If that is the case in your matter, we will inform you of this. Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication In some cases, one of the parties may believe that they are entitled to a decision in their favor before trial because there is not enough evidence to decide against them. The procedure used to ask the Court to decide in a party s favor before trial is called Summary Judgment (for a decision on the entire case) or Summary Adjudication (for a decision on only part of a case). Summary Judgments and Summary Adjudications (referred to as MSJ, which stands for Motion for Summary Judgment ) are generally not favored by the Court. Under California law, the Court prefers to hear matters at trial or contested hearings. And in many Probate Court matters MSJ s are rarely granted. MSJ s are used in cases where the evidence, even if viewed in a light most favorable to the other party, is not sufficient to support the claim requested. It is a very technical procedure and requires a great deal of time and preparation to file with the Court. Once filed, the opposing party has the right to respond and give their reasons why an MSJ should not be granted. While such motions are not routinely granted, they must be taken seriously because losing an MSJ would mean the end of a case before trial. Again, filing or opposing an MSJ adds additional time and expense to any lawsuit. Trial Preparation and Experts Once the discovery process is complete, and at some time throughout the lawsuit, a trial date, or contested hearing date, will be set by the Court. Once the date is set a number of deadlines are also set, including the time by which experts must be retained and possibly disclosed to the other side (assuming a party requests disclosure). Also, all pending discovery must be wrapped-up no later than 30 days prior to your trial date. 7
8 Trial preparation can be very time consuming due in large part to the scope of your lawsuit. There are witnesses to prepare for, motions to prepare and file, evidence to assemble, and documents to be subpoenaed directly to the trial court. Aside from discovery, trial preparation is the most time consuming part of most cases. It is not uncommon for the Court to continue the trial date after it has been set. This occurs either because the Court does not have the time to hear the trial (the Court often double or even triple books its courtrooms for trials in anticipation of settlement) or one of the parties will ask for a continuance. Trial For those cases that make it to trial, this is what you have been waiting for from the beginning. Trial is the point in the process where evidence is presented to the Court and a decision is made by the Judge or jury. In probate matters, which is just about anything filed in Probate Court including trust matters, a Judge will decide your case. In civil matters, either party may request a jury trial. If neither party request a jury trial, or if both parties agree, then a Judge will hear and decide the case. Once the actual trial is over, there may be any number of filings, closing briefs, motions, or other items required to be prepared and filed with the Court. And in Judge trials (called bench trials ) a decision is usually taken under submission, which means you will not know the result of your case for a month or two after the trial is complete and all closing briefs are filed with the Court. Need More Information? We will keep you informed regarding your case throughout the process. If you ever have any questions or would like more information regarding your case, feel free to contact us: Albertson & Davidson, LLP 3750 Santa Fe Avenue, Suite 109 Riverside, California T: (951) F: (951) Web: Blog:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO.: 16- DIVISION: CV- vs. Plaintiff, Defendant. ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING
If you have been sued as a defendant in a civil case...keep reading.
If you have been sued as a defendant in a civil case...keep reading. Court procedures can be complex. This brochure was developed to help Ohioans who are considering representing themselves in court. It
Getting a Trial Date in Cowlitz County
9950EN 6/2015 Getting a Trial Date in Cowlitz County Is this publication for me? Yes, if You have a civil case in Cowlitz County Superior Court AND The respondent/defendant in the case has filed a response
: : before this court (the Court Annexed Mediation Program ); and
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - In re: ADOPTION OF PROCEDURES GOVERNING : MEDIATION OF MATTERS AND THE
A Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients
A Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients by: Jennifer Loeb Clark Wilson LLP tel. 604.891.7766 jrl@cwilson.com Edited by: Larry Munn Clark Wilson LLP
EMPLOYEES GUIDE TO APPEALING A WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIM DENIAL
EMPLOYEES GUIDE TO APPEALING A WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIM DENIAL Appeals of workers compensation claim denials are handled by the Labor Commission s Adjudication Division. If you disagree with the claim
General Information on Representing Yourself in a Workers Compensation Case
General Information on Representing Yourself in a Workers Compensation Case Idaho Industrial Commission PO Box 83720 Boise, ID 83720-0041 Telephone: (208) 334-6000 Fax: (208) 332-7558 www.iic.idaho.gov
The What to Expect Series FINRA s Dispute Resolution Process 1
FINRA s Dispute Resolution Process 1 What to Expect: FINRA s Dispute Resolution Process It is rare for most firms to find themselves in a dispute with a customer, an employee, or another firm that escalates
Supreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions. (a) Discovery Methods.
Supreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions (a) Discovery Methods. Information is obtainable as provided in these rules through any of the following discovery methods: depositions upon oral examination
In recent years, energy industry users have increasingly voiced the complaint
Controlling Costs in Domestic Energy Arbitrations by The Hon. Mark Whittington 1, JAMS In recent years, energy industry users have increasingly voiced the complaint that arbitration has become much like
The Non-Lawyers Guide to Hearings before the State Engineer
The Non-Lawyers Guide to Hearings before the State Engineer The information provided here contains general information about how to represent yourself in a hearing. This information is to help you prepare
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE In the Matter of a ) Uniform Pretrial Order ) ) Administrative Order 3AO-03-04 (Amended) UNIFORM PRETRIAL ORDER In order
Case4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION
Case4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION STANDING ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE KANDIS A. WESTMORE (Revised
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RONALD DUTTON, : : Consolidated Under Plaintiff, : MDL DOCKET NO. 875 : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. : 09-62916 TODD SHIPYARDS CORP.,
litigating in Canada: a brief guide for U.S. clients
litigating in Canada: a brief guide for U.S. clients litigating in Canada: a brief guide for U.S. clients executive summary Despite the great deal the United States and Canada share in common, in many
Bylaws of the Lawyer-Client Fee Dispute Resolution Committee of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association. Enacted November 18, 2015
Bylaws of the Lawyer-Client Fee Dispute Resolution Committee of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association Enacted November 18, 2015 Preamble and Purpose 1.) Background. Under Rule V, Section 5 of the
RULE 10 FUNDS HELD BY THE CLERK
RULE 10 FUNDS HELD BY THE CLERK 10.1 General. A Judge of the District Court may order that any monies in actions pending before the Court be invested in any local financial institution for safe keeping.
The Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories NOTICE TO THE PROFESSION CASE MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES GENERAL GUIDELINES
The Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories NOTICE TO THE PROFESSION CASE MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES GENERAL GUIDELINES With the advent of the revised Rules of Court, it was thought appropriate to issue
What Is Small Claims Court? What Types Of Cases Can Be Filed In Small Claims Court? Should I Sue? Do I Have the Defendant s Address?
SMALL CLAIMS COURT What Is Small Claims Court? Nebraska law requires that every county court in the state have a division known as Small Claims Court (Nebraska Revised Statute 25-2801). Small Claims Court
DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE RECOMMENDED CASE HANDLING GUIDELINES FOR INSURERS
DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE RECOMMENDED CASE HANDLING GUIDELINES FOR INSURERS I. PREFACE Philosophy [Insurer] expects to work with the Firm and the insured to achieve the best result for the insured in
SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY PROBATE DIVISION
SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY PROBATE DIVISION Trial/Hearing Rules for Probate Judge: Mary Fingal Schulte, Supervising Judge Judge: Gerald Johnston Judge: Randall Sherman Clerks: Dept. L72, Mary Torrez
The Divorce Process. What to Expect. Cassandra P. Hicks
The Divorce Process What to Expect By Cassandra P. Hicks It is impossible to cover what can happen in any given case so the following is an effort to explain in general terms the overall divorce process
FACT SHEET FOR JUDGE SAM SPARKS
FACT SHEET FOR JUDGE SAM SPARKS CIVIL CASES Contacting the Court 1. Who should be contacted regarding scheduling matters? Contact Linda Mizell, Judicial Assistant, at (512) 916-5230, and/or the law clerk
Any civil action exempt from arbitration by action of a presiding judge under ORS 36.405.
CHAPTER 13 Arbitration 13.010 APPLICATION OF CHAPTER (1) This UTCR chapter applies to arbitration under ORS 36.400 to 36.425 and Acts amendatory thereof but, except as therein provided, does not apply
PART III Discovery. Overview of the Discovery Process CHAPTER 8 KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY. Information is obtainable by one or more discovery
PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8 Overview of the Discovery Process Generally, discovery is conducted freely by the parties without court intervention. Disclosure can be obtained through depositions, interrogatories,
CALIFORNIA TORT FORMS FROM EXPERT LITIGATORS (1st Edition) July 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS
CALIFORNIA TORT FORMS FROM EXPERT LITIGATORS (1st Edition) July 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS File Name Book Section Title CH01 Chapter 1 Animals 01-006 1.6 Sample Client Authorization to Release Medical 01-007
Rules for Bankruptcy Cases, B.E. 2542 (1999) Translation
Rules for Bankruptcy Cases, B.E. 2542 (1999) Translation By virtue of Section 19 of the Act for the Establishment of and Procedure for Bankruptcy Court B.E. 2542 (1999) the Chief Justice of the Central
The Academy of Northern Kentucky Collaborative Professionals. Collaborative Participation Agreement
The Academy of Northern Kentucky Collaborative Professionals Collaborative Participation Agreement The undersigned, and, (referred to individually as party, or collectively as the parties ) hereby agree
You ve Been Sued, Now What? A Roadmap Through An Employment Lawsuit
You ve Been Sued, Now What? A Roadmap Through An Employment Lawsuit California employers facing their first employment lawsuit can be in for a rude awakening. Such lawsuits are a harsh introduction to
THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ARBITRATION AS COMPARED TO LITIGATION. Arthur Mazirow, Esq., CRE
THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ARBITRATION AS COMPARED TO LITIGATION By Arthur Mazirow, Esq., CRE Real Estate Arbitrator, Mediator, Expert Witness and Consultant Los Angeles, California Website: Mazirow.com
NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Anthony Abbott, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Lockheed Martin Corp., et al., Defendants. Case No. 06-cv-701 Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan NOTICE OF CLASS
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you paid money to Microsoft for an MSN account established in your name at a Best Buy store, never logged
WHAT HAPPENS IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE
WHAT HAPPENS IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE From Negotiating With Insurance Companies To Trial By Michael A. Schafer, Attorney at Law 440 South Seventh Street, Ste. 200 Louisville, Kentucky 40203 (502) 584-9511
Counsel must be fully familiar with the Uniform Civil Rules for the Supreme Court 22 NYCRR Part 202.
JUSTICE GERALD E. LOEHR, J.S.C. Rockland County Supreme Court 1 South Main Street New City, New York 10956 Courtroom 1 Tel: (845) 483-8343 Fax: (845) 708-7236 Staff Bruce J. Pearl, Principal Law Secretary
BETH G. REINEKE, ESQUIRE 1003 W. CLEVELAND STREET TAMPA, FL 33606
BETH G. REINEKE, ESQUIRE 1003 W. CLEVELAND STREET TAMPA, FL 33606 BOARD CERTIFIED EMERITUS FAMILY ATTORNEY CERTIFIED FAMILY LAW MEDIATOR September 18, 2014 TELEPHONE: (813) 205-6675 EMAIL: BETH@BETHREINEKE.COM
Injury Case Roadmap. The Legal Process For Personal Injury Cases. By Christopher M. Davis, Attorney at Law
Injury Case Roadmap The Legal Process For Personal Injury Cases By Christopher M. Davis, Attorney at Law Davis Law Group, P.S. 2101 Fourth Avenue Suite 630 Seattle, WA 98121 206-727-4000 Davis Law Group,
INTRODUCTION TO SMALL CLAIMS COURT TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION TO SMALL CLAIMS COURT TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TO SUE OR NOT TO SUE? HOW TO FILE A SMALL CLAIMS CASE WHERE TO FILE FILING FEE NOTICE TO THE DEFENDANT COUNTERCLAIMS PREPARING FOR TRIAL
INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT. IC 5-11-5.5 Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection
As amended by P.L.79-2007. INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT IC 5-11-5.5 Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection IC 5-11-5.5-1 Definitions Sec. 1. The following definitions
Lesson 1. Health Information and Litigation ASSIGNMENT 1. Objectives. Criminal versus Civil Law
Health Information and Litigation ASSIGNMENT 1 Read this entire introduction. Then read Chapter 1 in your textbook, Legal Aspects of Health Information Management. When you ve read all of the material
CIRCUIT JUDGE OLIN W. SHINHOLSER COURTROOM GUIDELINES-CRIMINAL
CIRCUIT JUDGE OLIN W. SHINHOLSER COURTROOM GUIDELINES-CRIMINAL THE REQUIREMENTS STATED IN THESE RULES ARE MINIMAL, NOT ALL INCLUSIVE; AND THEY ARE INTENDED TO EMPHASIZE AND SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT OR
Former Law Office of Vincent DiCarlo
Former Law Office of Vincent DiCarlo As of September 1, 2008,Vincent DiCarlo is no longer engaged in the private practice of law. This site is no longer maintained, may no longer be accurate, and is provided
ISSUES PAPER: FAMILY LAW RULES ALBERTA RULES OF COURT PROJECT
ISSUES PAPER: FAMILY LAW RULES ALBERTA RULES OF COURT PROJECT October 2002 INTRODUCTION The Rules Project [1] The Alberta Rules of Court (the Rules) govern practice and procedure in the Alberta Court of
Medical Malpractice Litigation. What to Expect as a Defendant
Medical Malpractice Litigation What to Expect as a Defendant Being named as a defendant in a malpractice suit may be your first exposure to civil litigation. You will probably wish it would just go away.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Roger Krueger, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc., et al., Defendants. Case No. 11-cv-2781 Judge Susan Richard Nelson NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION
IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LOCAL RULES: ENTRY The following local rules are adopted to govern the practice and procedures of this Court, subject
What Happens Next? By Ross A. Jurewitz Injury Accident Attorney, Jurewitz Law Group. Tel: 619-233-5020 Toll Free: 888-233-5020 contact@jurewitz.
What Happens Next? The Legal Process Roadmap for Personal Injury Cases By Ross A. Jurewitz Injury Accident Attorney, Jurewitz Law Group Jurewitz Law Group 600 B Street Suite 1550 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel:
Managing Jones Act Personal Injury Litigation The Vessel Owner s Perspective. Lawrence R. DeMarcay, III
Managing Jones Act Personal Injury Litigation The Vessel Owner s Perspective by Lawrence R. DeMarcay, III Presented to the Offshore Marine Services Association / Loyola College of Law Industry Seminar
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO. 1682. Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO. 1682 Amending Civil Rules 16, 26, 33, 34, 37, and 45 concerning Discovery of Electronic Information IT IS ORDERED: 1. Civil Rule 16 is amended to read
Discovery Devices. Rule 26 requires the automatic disclosure of a host of basic information regarding the case
Discovery Devices Automatic (mandatory) disclosure Rule 26 requires the automatic disclosure of a host of basic information regarding the case Interrogatories Questions addressed to the other party Depositions
TRONOX TORT CLAIMS TRUST. Individual Review and Arbitration Procedures for Category A and Category D Personal Injury Claims
TRONOX TORT CLAIMS TRUST Individual Review and Arbitration Procedures for Category A and Category D Personal Injury Claims Pursuant to Sections 3.4 and 3.5 of the Tronox Tort Claims Trust Distribution
Submit a Valid Claim Form Deadline: February 12, 2016 Ask to be excluded Deadline: November 24, 2015. Object Deadline: November 24, 2015
NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles IF FIRE INSURANCE EXCHANGE APPLIED DEPRECIATION WHEN CALCULATING A PAYMENT MADE TO YOU ON A PROPERTY LOSS INSURANCE CLAIM,
Accounting and Related Services Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures
Accounting and Related Services Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures Rules Amended and Effective February 1, 2015 Available online at adr.org/accounting Table of Contents Introduction.... 6 Standard
JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM
JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM A delinquency petition is a court document alleging that a juvenile, between ages 10-16, has violated a law which would be a criminal offense if committed by an adult. Disposition
FARAH & FARAH RULES OF LAW
RULES OF LAW Injury Case Roadmap: The Legal Process for Personal Injury Cases BY EDDIE E. FARAH & CHARLIE E. FARAH, ATTORNEYS AT LAW ...insurance companies more and more are being run by bean counters,...
CIVIL TRIAL RULES. of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS. Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS. Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases...
CIVIL TRIAL RULES of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS Addendum to Local Rules Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases...2 Rule 1.11 Annual Calendar...3
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS PART FIVE - LAW DIVISION AMENDED COURT RULES
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS PART FIVE - LAW DIVISION AMENDED COURT RULES RULE 1. MEDIATION IN MALPRACTICE CASES In order to alleviate the burden to the parties
The Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements. By: Thomas J. Smith The Law Offices of Thomas J. Smith San Antonio, Texas
The Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements By: Thomas J. Smith The Law Offices of Thomas J. Smith San Antonio, Texas NIGHTMARE ON MEDIATION STREET You mediate a case where the Plaintiff is suing
FACT SHEET FOR JUDGE ORLANDO GARCIA
FACT SHEET FOR JUDGE ORLANDO GARCIA CIVIL CASES Contacting the Court 1. Who should be contacted regarding scheduling matters? Gail Johns, Courtroom Deputy, (210) 472-6550 Ext. 228 or Gail_Johns@txwd.uscourts.gov.
BUSINESS COURT PROCEDURES FOR THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BUSINESS COURT PROCEDURES FOR THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA SECTION 1 PHILOSOPHY, SCOPE AND GOALS 1.1 - Citation to Procedures 1.2 - Purpose and Scope 1.3 - Goals
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. 2:08-md-01919-MJP. Lead Case No. C07-1874 MJP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE IN RE WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE AND ERISA LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ERISA Action No. 2:08-md-01919-MJP
PRETRIAL LITIGATION IN A NUTSHELL. R. LAWRENCE DESSEM Professor of Law University of Tennessee ST. PAUL, MINN. WEST PUBLISHING CO.
PRETRIAL LITIGATION IN A NUTSHELL By R. LAWRENCE DESSEM Professor of Law University of Tennessee ST. PAUL, MINN. WEST PUBLISHING CO. 1992 PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.. TABLE OF CASES TABLE OF STATUTES
Family Law Dispute Resolution Options
Family Law Dispute Resolution Options If you are presented with a divorce or other family law matter which requires a resolution, there are a number of procedural models which may be used. The most commonly
Addressing Abusive Lawyer Conduct in Relation to Litigation Proceedings
Author: Attorney Dan A. Riegleman N63 W23965 Main Street Sussex, Wisconsin 53089 Prepared: 06/01/10 WHITE PAPER: DR2504 Addressing Abusive Lawyer Conduct in Relation to Litigation Proceedings There are
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS PROCEDURAL RULES FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION HEARINGS
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS PROCEDURAL RULES FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION HEARINGS These Procedural Rules for Workers Compensation Hearings were formally
Family Law Discovery Issues
Research Guide Last Updated: January 2013 Table of Contents How to Prepare and Serve Form Interrogatories on the Other Party (JC Form #FL-145)... 2 How to Respond to Family Law Form Interrogatories (not
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, RIVERSIDE BRANCH ) ) ) DATE: TIME: DEPT:
THURMAN W. ARNOLD, III, SBN: 1 Certified Family Law Specialist South Civic Drive, Suite 1- PALM SPRINGS, CA TEL: (00-1 FAX: (00-0 Attorney for Respondent, JANE DOE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. DAVID HIMBER V. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF NEW YORK, INC. CASE NO.: 09 Civ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAVID HIMBER V. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF NEW YORK, INC. CASE NO.: 09 Civ. 4143 (SJF) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT All persons who received
GENERAL INFORMATION FOR UNREPRESENTED INJURED WORKERS ABOUT THE WORKERS COMPENSATION HEARING PROCESS FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
GENERAL INFORMATION FOR UNREPRESENTED INJURED WORKERS ABOUT THE WORKERS COMPENSATION HEARING PROCESS FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 1. Where can I get information about the hearing process?... 2 2. Where else
The Foundation of the International Association of Defense Counsel SURVEY OF INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION PROCEDURES: A REFERENCE GUIDE
Responses submitted by: Name: Roddy Bourke Law Firm/Company: McCann FitzGerald Location: Dublin, Ireland 1. Would your jurisdiction be described as a common law or civil code jurisdiction? The Republic
2 California Evidence (5th), Discovery
2 California Evidence (5th), Discovery I. GENERAL PRINCIPLES A. [ 1] Purpose of Discovery. B. [ 2] Modern Discovery Procedures. C. [ 3] Relation to Pretrial Conference. D. Overview of California Discovery
A Bill Regular Session, 2015 SENATE BILL 830
Stricken language would be deleted from and underlined language would be added to present law. State of Arkansas 90th General Assembly A Bill Regular Session, 2015 SENATE BILL 830 By: Senator D. Sanders
APPEARANCE, PLEA AND WAIVER
Guide to Municipal Court What Types of Cases Are Heard in Municipal Court? Cases heard in municipal court are divided into four general categories: Violations of motor vehicle and traffic laws Violations
Case 2:10-cv-00802-CW Document 90 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
Case 2:10-cv-00802-CW Document 90 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION MURIELLE MOLIERE, Plaintiff, v. OPTION ONE MORTGAGE, et al., Defendants.
International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution www.cpradr.org
International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution www.cpradr.org ECONOMICAL LITIGATION AGREEMENTS ( ELA ) FOR COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS AS A MEANS OF REDUCING CIVIL LITIGATION COSTS THE MODEL CIVIL
MEDIATION PROCEDURES FOR RESOLVING BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS DISPUTES
6465 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 470 Minneapolis, MN 55426 Phone: 800-474-2371 Fax: 952-345-1160 www.adrforum.com MEDIATION PROCEDURES FOR RESOLVING BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS DISPUTES July 11, 2014 1 FORUM Request
FAIRFAX CIRCUIT COURT CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DIVORCE CASES
FAIRFAX CIRCUIT COURT CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DIVORCE CASES 1. Filing Pleadings: A Cover Sheet must be filed with the Complaint and any Cross-Complaint stating whether the case is contested or uncontested,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PASCO AND PINELLAS COUNTIES, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 2013-064 PA/PI-CIR
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PASCO AND PINELLAS COUNTIES, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 2013-064 PA/PI-CIR RE: PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES Rule 1.200(c) of the Florida Rules of
CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656
CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656 12650. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the False Claims Act. (b) For purposes of this article: (1) "Claim" includes any
Cincinnati Academy of Collaborative Professionals Collaborative Family Law Participation Agreement. The undersigned, and, (referred to individually
Cincinnati Academy of Collaborative Professionals Collaborative Family Law Participation Agreement 09.21.2011 The undersigned, and, (referred to individually as party, or collectively as the parties )
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT OWNER: AGENT: PROPERTY: APN: Owner and Property Manager, as hereinafter identified, agree as follows: 1. APPOINTMENT OF AGENT: Owner hereby appoints and grants Property Manager
Title 31 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION
31.02.01.00 Title 31 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION Subtitle 02 POWERS AND DUTIES HEARINGS Chapter 01 Hearings Authority: Insurance Article, 2-109 and 2-205 2-215; State Government Article, 10-206;
SELECT SERVICES FLAT FEE REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT page 1 of 8
Utah Family Law, LC Tel. No. 801-466-9277 E-mail: eric@divorceutah.com Attorney Eric K. Johnson - Attorney Russell W. Hartvigsen Mail: 2666 South 2000 East, Suite 101 Salt Lake City Utah 84109 REMEMBER:
(2) For production of public records or hospital medical records. Where the subpoena commands any custodian of public records or any custodian of hosp
Rule 45. Subpoena. (a) Form; Issuance. (1) Every subpoena shall state all of the following: a. The title of the action, the name of the court in which the action is pending, the number of the civil action,
RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES
LOCAL RULES FOR FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI [Renumbered and codified by order of the Supreme Court effective May 18, 2006; amended effective April 23, 2009.] RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES
COMPLEX LITIGATION UNIT PROCEDURES THE 17th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
COMPLEX LITIGATION UNIT PROCEDURES THE 17th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA SECTION 1 PHILOSOPHY, SCOPE AND GOALS 1.1 - Citation to Procedures 1.2 - Purpose and Scope 1.3 - Goals 1.4
Small Claims Court Information provided by Oregon State Bar http://www.osbar.org/public/legalinfo/1061_smallclaims.htm
Community Alliance of Tenants Tenant Education Information is for general information purposes only, and is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney Small Claims Court Information provided by Oregon
HAWAI`I REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 672B DESIGN CLAIM CONCILIATION PANEL. Act 207, 2007 Session Laws of Hawai`i
HAWAI`I REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 672B DESIGN CLAIM CONCILIATION PANEL Act 207, 2007 Session Laws of Hawai`i Section 672B-1 Definitions 672B-2 Administration of chapter 672B-3 Design claim conciliation
In March, 2012, Judge Robinson was appointed to fill the Third Circuit Court vacancy.
JUDGE PHILLIP ROBINSON 3rd Circuit Court Room 611 I. BRIEF BIOGRAPHY Judge Phillip Robinson is a lifelong Nashvillian having graduated from Montgomery Bell Academy in 1968, the University of Tennessee
This Notice applies to you if you have had a parking ticket issued at one of the MBTA s Honor Box Parking Lots.
NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION PROVIDING RELIEF TO THOSE WITH UNPAID PARKING TICKETS ISSUED AT ONE OR MORE OF THE MBTA S HONOR BOX PARKING LOTS This Notice applies to you if you have had
United States District Court
Case 4:11-cv-00655-RC-ALM Document 184 Filed 03/26/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 3232 United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. Civil Action
A Practical Guide to. Hiring a LAWYER
A Practical Guide to Hiring a LAWYER A PRACTIAL GUIDE TO HIRING A LAWYER I. Introduction 3 II. When do you Need a Lawyer? 3 III. How to Find a Lawyer 4 A. Referrals 4 B. Lawyer Referral Service 5 C. Unauthorized
CLAIMS AGAINST TELEPHONE ANSWERING SERVICES: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART TWO: WHAT TO DO WHEN A CLAIM HAPPENS
CLAIMS AGAINST TELEPHONE ANSWERING SERVICES: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART TWO: WHAT TO DO WHEN A CLAIM HAPPENS Martin M. Ween, Esq. Partner Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman
VIEJAS BAND OF KUMEYAAY INDIANS TRIBAL CODE TORT LIABILITY ORDINANCE. Enacted 11-20-2013. Table of Contents
VIEJAS BAND OF KUMEYAAY INDIANS TRIBAL CODE TORT LIABILITY ORDINANCE Enacted 11-20-2013 Table of Contents Section 1 General Provisions... 1 1.01 Purpose... 1 1.02 Exclusive Remedy.... 1 1.03 Effective
Guidelines for Guardians ad Litem for Children in Family Court
Guidelines for Guardians ad Litem for Children in Family Court Preamble The following are guidelines for attorneys and non-lawyer volunteers appointed as guardians ad litem for children in most family
EXECUTIVE ORDER (Language Services in the Courts)
SUPREME COURT No. 2012-05 EXECUTIVE ORDER (Language Services in the Courts) Pursuant to the authority granted to the Chief Justice of the Rhode Island Supreme Court by 8-15-2 of the Rhode Island General
COMBUSTION ENGINEERING 524(g) ASBESTOS PI TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES
COMBUSTION ENGINEERING 524(g) ASBESTOS PI TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES Pursuant to Section 5.10 of the Combustion Engineering 524(g) Asbestos PI Trust Distribution Procedures (
RETAINER AGREEMENT. Dibble & Miller, P.C.
RETAINER AGREEMENT Dibble & Miller, P.C. Print Client s First Name, Middle Initial and Last Name This Retainer Agreement is a binding contract between the Law Firm of Dibble & Miller, P.C. and you, the
June 24, 2010 THE MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD ROCKET DOCKET. By: Attorney Josh Bowers. Navigating the Administrative Process of the MSPB 1
June 24, 2010 THE MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD ROCKET DOCKET By: Attorney Josh Bowers Navigating the Administrative Process of the MSPB 1 The U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) is an independent
AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA To amend the District of Columbia Procurement Practices Act of 1985 to make the District s false claims act consistent with federal law and thereby qualify
Case 1:13-cv-00586-AWI-SAB Document 41 Filed 02/20/14 Page 1 of 13
Case :-cv-00-awi-sab Document Filed 0// Page of 0 DALE L. ALLEN, JR., SBN KEVIN P. ALLEN, SBN 0 ALLEN, GLAESSNER & WERTH, LLP 0 Montgomery Street, Suite 0 San Francisco, California 0 Telephone: () -00