MULTI-TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT. Response to Intervention Positive Behavior Intervention System Data Teams



Similar documents
Wappingers Central School District

Identifying Students with Specific Learning Disabilities. Part 1: Introduction/Laws & RtI in Relation to SLD Identification

Directions: Complete assessment with team. Determine current level of implementation and priority. Level of Implementation. Priority.

Technical Assistance Paper

The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support

Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) Problem-Solving/Response to Intervention Guide (PS/RtI)

Response to Intervention: The Mississippi Experience

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT MEMORANDUM

MTSS Implementation Components Ensuring common language and understanding

COLLABORATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING AND RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION (CPS/RtI)

Response to Intervention/ Student Support Team Manual Department of Psychological Services

Response to Intervention

WHAT IS COGNITIVE INTERVENTION/REHABILITATION?

Kansas Multi-Tier System of Support

District 2854 Ada-Borup Public Schools. Reading Well By Third Grade Plan. For. Ada-Borup Public Schools. Drafted April 2012

Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) School Based Team/Problem-Solving Team & Response to Intervention (RtI) Procedural Manual

Niskayuna Elementary Program

Hamilton Southeastern Schools

Adapted from the Flagler County Public School MTSS Manual

A Family Guide to Multi-Tier System of Supports (MTSS)

Recommended School Based Teams

Aligning Social Emotional Learning Standards to Illinois Academic Standards Using the RTI Model

Schools for All Children

Instructionally Appropriate IEPs. A Skills Based Approach to IEP Development Division of Special Populations

Multi -Tiered System of Supports:

Multi-Tiered Systems of Support: Implications for Special Education

Module 1 Guided Notes

GUIDELINES FOR THE IEP TEAM DATA COLLECTION &

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists Definition of an Effective School Psychologist

RtI Response to Intervention

LAKE SILVER ELEMENTARY

Ch. 4: Four-Step Problem Solving Model

IEP Basics for Boston SpedPac Written by Carolyn Kain

Standards for Special Education Teachers

Oak Park School District. School Psychologist Evaluation

Comprehensive Reading Plan K-12 A Supplement to the North Carolina Literacy Plan. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

AND LEARNING 21st Century Teaching and Learning

Manchester Essex Regional School District District Curriculum Accommodation Plan (DCAP)

Establishing a Screening Process

Transcript: What Is Progress Monitoring?

Nash Rocky Mount Public Schools Questions from the Read to Achieve Parent Information Sessions December 2012

Special Education Program Descriptions

What is Response to Intervention (RTI)? How does it work in schools with Inclusion?

Guidance Counselors. Life Preservers in a Sea of Change

DRIVING INSTRUCTION THROUGH DATA WITHOUT DATA IT IS JUST AN OPINION

Response to Intervention Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Tier 2 Supplementary Interventions

Massachusetts Tiered System of Support (MTSS)

Curriculum Management

CALIFORNIA S TEACHING PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS (TPE)

5 th Grade Online Single Subject Acceleration FAQ Principals and AIG Teachers July 2013

VERMONT Multi-tiered System of Supports Response to Intervention and Instruction (MTSS-RtII) Self-Assessment

Student Intervention Programs & Special Education Services. Peters Township School District

Spring School Psychologist. RTI² Training Q &A

Iron County School District

The Role of the School Psychologist in the RTI Process

Drafted March This special needs policy will help to ensure that: This policy addresses students in the following categories:

Uinta County School District #1 Multi Tier System of Supports Guidance Document

Executive Summary. Anderson Early Childhood Center

2012 University of Texas System/ Texas Education Agency

Arizona Department of Education Standards for Effective LEAs and Continuous Improvement Plans for LEAs and Schools

North Carolina Read to Achieve

CASP Position Paper: School-Wide Positive Behavior Intervention and Support (SW-PBIS): A Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) for Student Wellness

North Carolina Read to Achieve

Belmont Public Schools Special Education Programs

Standards of Quality and Effectiveness for Professional Teacher Preparation Programs APPENDIX A

South Washington County Schools World s Best Workforce Summary Report

BUILDING CURRICULUM ACCOMMODATION PLAN

Program Models. proficiency and content skills. After school tutoring and summer school available

Multi-Tiered System of Supports: Uniting Through One Vision

Teacher Training Guide

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists

Sample Teacher Interview Questions

M.A. in Special Education / Candidates for Initial License

Effectively Addressing Behavioral Concerns within the Individualized Education Program

Facilitated Modules 60 inservice credits. Assessment and Evaluation 60 inservice credits Facilitated

Copyright State of Florida Department of State 2011

IDEA Preschool $2,000. Grant Notes 2011 IDEA. IDEA School age $27,362. IDEA Preschool ARRA $2,921 IDEA Total: $32,283

Middle School Special Education Progress Monitoring and Goal- Setting Procedures. Section 2: Reading {Reading- Curriculum Based Measurement (R- CBM)}

Patterns of Strengths and Weaknesses Standards and Procedures. for. Identification of Students with Suspected Specific Learning Disabilities

SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY

UTAH S 3 Tier Model of READING INSTRUCTION

Instructional Management Plan

The School District of Lee County STUDENT PROGRESSION PLAN

Transcription:

MULTI-TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT Response to Intervention Positive Behavior Intervention System Data Teams

CRITERIA FOR SUCCESS Participants will be able to: Have a working definition for MTSS Identify the components of a three tier model Determine when to begin a PEP Locate resources Provide appropriate interventions to support students Use the TIPS model to provide success for all learners

MULTI-TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT NC MTSS is a multi-tiered framework which promotes school improvement through engaging, research-based academic and behavioral practices. NC MTSS employs a systems approach using datadriven problem-solving to maximize growth for all.

REVIEWING THE THREE TIER MODEL

TIER I: CORE Who: All students are in Tier I (Core) What: Evidence-based programs and practices demonstrated to produce good academic and behavior outcomes for the majority of students Effectiveness: If at least 80% of all students are meeting academic and behavior benchmarks in Core alone. What about subgroups? Slide adapted from G. Batsche 5

TIER II: SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTION Who: Students needing supplemental support in addition to Core instruction (approx. 20% of students) What: Evidence-based programs and practices demonstrated to improve academic and behavior performance in Core Effectiveness: If at least 70-80% of students improve academic and behavior performance (toward Core standards) Slide adapted from G. Batsche

TIER III: INTENSIVE INSTRUCTION Who: Students needing Intensive support in addition to Supplemental and Core instruction (approx. 5% of students) What: Evidence-based programs and practices demonstrated to improve academic and behavior performance Effectiveness: Academic and behavior progress toward performance in Core Slide adapted from G. Batsche 7

PEP: WHO NEEDS IT AND WHEN? After a problem is identified, the team should problem solve without a personal education plan. The PEP should begin when the team determines the child needs a personal plan to address his or her needs.

WCS MULTI-TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT Based on the Team Initiated Problem Solving (TIPS) model for problem solving Based on a framework of problem solving for ALL students including those who have already been identified Focused on total school improvement; putting all tiers together to meet the needs of all students

WCS RESOURCES Wilkes County Schools Webpage>WCS Staff>RTI Tab

TIPS Model: PROBLEM SOLVING MODEL Steps to Follow Identify the problem Evaluate and revise the plan. Develop Hypothesis Develop and Implement Action Plan Discuss and select solutions.

PROBLEM SOLVING SORT Team Initiated Problem Solving: What it is and what it is not?

TIPS: TEAM INITIATED PROBLEM SOLVING

IDENTIFY THE PROBLEM Math Fact Mastery Problem Solving Computation ELA Written Comprehension Accuracy Fluency Behavior Focus Impulsiveness Anger Management Self-Control

DEVELOP HYPOTHESIS Determine cause and triage Collect multiple means of data Make an informed guess Answer, Why?

INSTRUCTION: HOW? Guiding Questions How was content delivered? What was the duration of the instruction?

CURRICULUM: WHAT? Guiding Questions What programs have been implemented in this area? To what fidelity was the program implemented?

ENVIRONMENT: WHERE? Guiding Questions When do pullouts happen? Were students in a small group? Is their home environment contributing to the problem? * Where was the student seated?

LEARNER: WHO? Guiding Questions Why do you think the student does that? What skills do you think the student lacks, that other students the same age understand and use? What is keeping the student from learning these skills? What should we concentrate on first?

PLAN AND TEST HYPOTHESIS Review Interview Observe Test

CASE STUDY: MARCUS 2 nd grader Lack of number sense Poor memory skills Gives up easily Lack of focus Day dreamer Supportive home environment Enjoys working with a partner Causes and Cures, p. 59 Weak vocabulary Poor math fluency Skips problems, entire rows Cannot remember directions Poor self image Likes to draw Plays piano

DATA FOR MARCUS Assessment Data He can identify the greater number only 40% of the time. He counts accurately about 60% of the time. Makes most of his mistakes between the numbers of 11-20. Conclusions Encoding problem Difficulty seeing patterns and relationships among symbols they represent Working memory problem

PRECISE PROBLEM STATEMENT Report and discuss outcomes to the team Identify and record the precise problem statement Narrow the focus from step one using the results of RIOT

DISCUSS AND SELECT SOLUTIONS Solution should be based on the precise problem statement which is developed around instruction, curriculum, learner and/or environment Precise, clear statement must be set before plan implementation

DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT AN ACTION PLAN Identify interventions that are researchbased/evidence based Describe plan of action (who, what, where, how often) Include specific goals (SMART) Progress-monitoring plans included

INTERVENTIONS ARE A layer of support that builds upon CORE instruction Research based Evidence based Systematic Specific to student deficits Plan of action for student growth ARE NOT Not isolated or pulled from CORE instruction Small group instruction One on one instruction Preferential seating Modified assignments Randomly selected

SMART GOALS Specific Measurable Attainable Reasonable SAMPLE: Measurement Strategy: Data Decision rules: If then. Review Date: Timely

POSSIBLE AVAILABLE DATA AT FOUNDATIONAL CORE EOG EOC Universal Screening Benchmark Academic Common Formative Assessments Behavior Office Discipline Reports Attendance Reports Survey Data

EVALUATE AND REVISE THE PLAN Discuss student outcomes Review plan Revise if necessary

POSSIBLE NEXT STEPS Continue the plan Choose a new intervention plan (same tier) Move to next tier Involve other student service personnel (counselor, psychologist, social worker, speech therapist, resource teacher, etc )

CRITERIA FOR SUCCESS Participants will be able to: Have a working definition for MTSS Identify the components of a three tier model Determine when to begin a PEP Locate resources Provide appropriate interventions to support students Use the TIPS model to provide success for all learners

FOLLOW UP What support do you still need at the district level to implement MTSS successfully within your school?