Eric Jamoom and Chun-Ju Hsiao National Center for Health Statistics



Similar documents
National perceptions of barriers, benefits, and federal policies impacting EHR adoption in physician offices, 2011

National perceptions of EHR adoption: Barriers, impacts, and federal policies

Mode and respondent effects in a dual-mode survey of physicians:

Physician Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems: United States, 2011

Use and Characteristics of Electronic Health Record Systems Among Office-based Physician Practices: United States,

Innovations Support Physicians in Delivering Advanced Care? Jennifer King AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting

Meaningful Use and Lab Related Requirements

Use and Characteristics of Electronic Health Record Systems Among Office-based Physician Practices: United States,

Physician Motivations for Adoption of Electronic Health Records Dawn Heisey-Grove, MPH; Vaishali Patel, PhD

The HITECH Act and Meaningful Use Implications for Population and Public Health

Meaningful Use - The Basics

Meaningful Use Objectives

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Meaningful Use Rules Proposed for Electronic Health Record Incentives Under HITECH Act By: Cherilyn G. Murer, JD, CRA

A Guide to Understanding and Qualifying for Meaningful Use Incentives

0 What is Meaningful Use and where are we? 0 What is the Physician Quality Reporting System and where stage are we on?

Dr. Peters has declared no conflicts of interest related to the content of his presentation.

MDeverywhere, Inc. Presents 2014 CMS EHR Incentive Program Requirements: What Providers Need To Know

The Impact of Proposed Meaningful Use Modifications for June 23, 2015

Electronic Medical Records. Robert M. Underwood, MD, CPE, FAAEM CMIO, RMH Healthcare

Health Information Technology (HIT) and the Medicaid/CHIP Health Information Exchange (HIE) Advisory Committee

Regional Extension Centers: Support for EMR Adoption and Meaningful Use Achievement. Jennifer McAnally Director, tnrec

Achieving Meaningful Use with Centricity EMR

Faculty Disclosure. Pharmacist Learning Objectives. Pharmacy e-hit: The Future of Pharmacy and Patient Care

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Presented by. Terri Gonzalez Director of Practice Improvement North Carolina Medical Society

Where to Begin? Auditing the Current EHR System

Guide To Meaningful Use

What GI Practices Need to Know About the Electronic Health Record Incentive Program. Joel V. Brill, MD, AGAF Lawrence R. Kosinski, MD, MBA, AGAF

Stage 2 Meaningful Use What the Future Holds. Lindsey Wiley, MHA HIT Manager Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

Meaningful Use Stage 1:

Meaningful Use 2015 and beyond. Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist

Lunch and Learn IFAF 09/24/11. Michael L. Brody, DPM

EHR Incentive Program Updates. Jason Felts, MS HIT Practice Advisor

Contact: Barbara J Stout RN, BSC Implementation Specialist University of Kentucky Regional Extension Center

MEETING MEANINGFUL USE IN MICROMD -STAGE TWO- Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist

Medweb Telemedicine 667 Folsom Street, San Francisco, CA Phone: Fax:

Review of Literature. July 22, Compiled by: Dr. Sanjeev Tandon and Sundus Adhi at CDC/OSELS/PHSIPO

BEGINNER MEDICAID EHR INCENTIVE PROGRAM FOR ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONALS. » An Introduction to: Last Updated: April 2014

Electronic Medical Records and Public Health

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Presenter: Linda Wise, EMR Training Specialist

Meaningful Use of Certified EHR Technology with My Vision Express*

Achieving Meaningful Use in Private Practice. A close examination of Stage 2 requirements

Health Information Technology and the National Quality Agenda. Daphne Ayn Bascom, MD PhD Chief Clinical Systems Officer Medical Operations

EMR Use in the Age of Healthcare Reform. C. Martin Harris, M.D. Chief Information Officer, Cleveland Clinic Executive Director, ecleveland Clinic

Client Alert. CMS Releases Proposed Rule On Meaningful Use Of Electronic Health Record Technology

A Provider s Perspective on Electronic Health Record Systems Adoption in Small Practices

Incentives to Accelerate EHR Adoption

Achieving Meaningful Use Training Manual

Meaningful Use. Goals and Principles

Issue Brief Findings from HSC

Contact Information: West Texas Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center th Street MS 6232 Lubbock, Texas

Health Information Technology in Healthcare: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 1

E Z BIS ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS

AAP Meaningful Use: Certified EHR Technology Criteria

Meaningful Use in 2015 and Beyond Changes for Stage 2

Meaningful Use. Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Going beyond Meaningful Use with EMR solutions from the Centricity portfolio

NHCHC Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records Resource Catalogue. Meaningful Use Overview

October 12, Dear Health Care Provider:

Meaningful Use and Electronic Health Record. May 16, 2012

Toward Meaningful Use of HIT

STAGE 2 of the EHR Incentive Programs

TORCH Meaningful Use Assessment Program

Meaningful Use Qualification Plan

SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE 2013 AHA ANNUAL SURVEY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPLEMENT

Transcription:

What does Meaningful Use mean to office-based physicians? Eric Jamoom and Chun-Ju Hsiao National Center for Health Statistics AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting June 24, 2013 National Center for Health Statistics Division of Health Care Statistics

Objectives To describe differences in select computerized capabilities associated with the Stage 1 Meaningful Use (MU) objectives among physicians that report their EHR meets the MU criteria

Background HITECH Act Meaningful Use Incentive Program EHR adoption trends 14% of office-based physicians had EHR systems with 10 of the 15 Stage 1 core set objectives in 2011 41% of physicians self-report they have a system that meets the MU criteria. SOURCE: National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey EMR Supplement and Physician Workflow study, 2011. NOTES: Caption: MU is meaningful use.

3 Stages: EHR Meaningful Use Stage 1 Data capture and sharing (2011-2013) Stage 2 Advanced clinical processes (2014-2015) Stage 3* Improved outcomes (2016-2017) *Stage 3 will be defined in future CMS rulemaking. Source : Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

Methods: Data Sources NAMCS EMR Supplement 2011 Content: Tracks EHR adoption, select computerized capabilities, intent to apply for MU, HIE NAMCS Physician Workflow Supplement 2011 Follow-up to the 2011 NEMRS Content Barriers to using EHRs Attitudes about using EHRs Policies that influence adoption of EHRs http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ahcd/ahcd_survey_instruments.htm#namcs

2011 Workflow Study Flow Chart Total NAMCS EMR Mail Sample (N=10,302) Out of scope (n~3100) Unknown (n~ 1,900) IN SCOPE EMR Mail Sample (n=5,266) Refusals (n=709) EMR Respondent (n=4,557) Workflow Respondent (n=3180) Adopters N=1793 Non Adopters N=1387 Analytical sample: 1,134 respondents to both EMR and Workflow surveys self-reported their EHR meets MU Criteria

Results SOURCE: National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey EMR Supplement and Physician Workflow study, 2011. NOTES: Caption: MU is meaningful use.

Results Computerized capabilities among adopters with an EHR that meets Meaningful Use criteria About 80% or more had the following computerized capabilities: Record patient history and demographics Order entry for prescriptions Record comprehensive medication and problem list Send prescriptions to pharmacy electronically (e-rx) Drug-drug interactions/ contraindication warnings About 2 of 3 physicians had the following computerized capabilities: Clinical summaries for patients at each visit Provide reminders for guideline based for interventions/screening Meeting above capabilities of Stage 1 MU (43%) Health information exchange of summaries (55%)

Discussion Among physicians who report that they use an EHR that meets meaningful use criteria, 57% did not have an EHR with the select required capabilities under the MU Stage 1 Core Set objectives. Discrepancies exist among physicians perceptions of meeting MU and having select computerized capabilities associated with meeting MU criteria. Implications for physicians having an EHR that meets subsequent stages of the MU criteria.

Limitations Time and respondent differences between EMR and workflow Workflow survey lagged by ~2 months from their completion of EMR survey (possible temporal effects). Respondents completing EMR and Workflow questionnaires may not be the same Survey did not contain all 15 core capabilities associated with MU Conservative estimate Measuring the core capabilities associated with MU and meeting MU was based on self-report (not objective)

NAMCS: EMR mail survey NAMCS: Physician Workflow Study Acknowledgments: - National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) - Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) For more information please contact Eric Jamoom at the National Center for Health Statistics 3311 Toledo Road, Room 3304, Hyattsville, MD 27082 Telephone: (301) 458-4798 E-mail: Ejamoom@cdc.gov Web: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ DISCLAIMER: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics Division of Health Care Statistics