8/14/2012 California Dual Demonstration DRAFT Quality Metrics



Similar documents
Trends in Part C & D Star Rating Measure Cut Points

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) strives to make information available to all. Nevertheless, portions of our files including

Medicare Part C & D Star Ratings: Update for August 5, 2015 Part C & D User Group Call

An Update on Medicare Parts C & D Performance Measures

Fact Sheet Star Ratings

Star Quality Ratings: Legal, Operational and Strategic Questions for MA Organizations and Part D Plan Sponsors

Medicare Health & Drug Plan Quality and Performance Ratings 2013 Part C & Part D Technical Notes. First Plan Preview DRAFT

Key Points about Star Ratings from the CMS 2016 Final Call Letter

HEDIS, STAR Performance Metrics. Sheila Linehan, RN,MPH, CPHQ Director of QM, Horizon BCBSNJ July 16, 2014

Report on comparing quality among Medicare Advantage plans and between Medicare Advantage and fee-for-service Medicare

Quality Measures Overview

Medicare 2015 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes DRAFT

Performance Measurement for the Medicare and Medicaid Eligible (MME) Population in Connecticut Survey Analysis

2013 ACO Quality Measures

See page 331 of HEDIS 2013 Tech Specs Vol 2. HEDIS specs apply to plans. RARE applies to hospitals. Plan All-Cause Readmissions (PCR) *++

The Star Treatment: Estimating the Impact of Star Ratings on Medicare. Advantage Enrollments. Appendices

Fact Sheet Star Ratings

HEDIS/CAHPS 101. August 13, 2012 Minnesota Measurement and Reporting Workgroup

2015 PROVIDER TOOLKIT Understanding the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Stars Rating System

Coventry Health Care of Florida, Inc. Coventry Health Plan of Florida, Inc. Summit Health Plan of Florida

Medicare 2016 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes. First Plan Preview DRAFT

Medicare Advantage Stars: Are the Grades Fair?

Coventry Health Care of Florida, Inc. Coventry Health Plan of Florida, Inc. Coventry Health and Life Insurance Company Commercial Lines of Business

Medicare 2016 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes

All Medicare Advantage Organizations, Prescription Drug Plan Sponsors, and Other Interested Parties

Department of Health Services. Behavioral Health Integrated Care. Health Home Certification Application

Medicare 2014 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes

Improving Quality of Care for Medicare Patients: Accountable Care Organizations

Medicare. Orientation Guide

Ohio Health Homes Learning Community Meeting. Overview of Health Homes Measures

Medicaid Managed Care EQRO and MLTSS Quality. April 3, 2014 IPRO State of Nebraska EQRO

HealthCare Partners of Nevada. Heart Failure

Improving Quality of Care for Medicare Patients: Accountable Care Organizations

7/31/2014. Medicare Advantage: Time to Re-examine Your Engagement Strategy. Avalere Health. Eric Hammelman, CFA. Overview

Welcome to Magellan Complete Care

A COMPARISON OF MEDI-CAL MANAGED CARE P4P MEASURE SETS

STARs Tutorial Medicare Advantage Plan Star Ratings and Bonus Payments in 2012 A Tutorial for Utilizing SETMA s Deployment of the STARS MA Program

Shoot For The Stars. Medicare Advantage Plans. Quality Scores Drive Participation 1

H7833_150304MO01. Information for Care Providers about UnitedHealthcare Connected (Medicare- Medicaid Plan) in Harris County, Texas

11/2/2015 Domain: Care Coordination / Patient Safety

Health Care Reform Update January 2012 MG LILLY USA, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

A Detailed Data Set From the Year 2011

MEASURING CARE QUALITY

Numerator Details. - An acute or nonacute inpatient admission with a diagnosis of AOD (AOD Dependence

Chapter Three Accountable Care Organizations

SUMMARY TABLE OF MEASURES, PRODUCT LINES AND CHANGES

Medical Management. G.2 At a Glance. G.3 Procedures Requiring Prior Authorization. G.5 How to Contact or Notify Medical Management

Washington Common Measure Set on Healthcare Quality. Behavioral Health Measure Selection Workgroup Meeting #2 September 14, 2015

Quality Measures for Pharmacies

YOUR FAST TRACK TO LIVING WELL. A Step Ahead Get answers to your diabetes questions. Member Rights The care and service you need.

Behavioral Health Quality Standards for Providers

Explanation of CMS Proposed Performance Measurement Framework for ACOs and Comparison with IHA P4P Measure Set April 2011

Stay Healthy. In the Know. Screenings you and your family need. Protect yourself against health care fraud.

Texas Medicaid Managed Care and Children s Health Insurance Program

HCCs and Star-Ratings: An IPA s Successful Approach to Revenue Integrity. Nancy Hirschl, CCS Victoria McKemy, MHA James Taylor, MD, CPC

Medicare Shared Savings Program Quality Measure Benchmarks for the 2015 Reporting Year

Medicare Health Risk Assessment Questionnaire

2015 HEDIS/CAHPS Effectiveness of Care Report for 2014 Service Measures Oregon, Idaho and Montana Commercial Business

Table 1 Performance Measures. Quality Monitoring P4P Yr1 Yr2 Yr3. Specification Source. # Category Performance Measure

NCQA Health Insurance Plan Ratings Methodology March 2015

OBJECTIVES AGING POPULATION AGING POPULATION AGING IMPACT ON MEDICARE AGING POPULATION

CMS MA Star Ratings Work Group Discussion Forum

All Medicare Advantage Organizations, Prescription Drug Plan Sponsors, and Other Interested Parties

Demonstrating Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements for Eligible Providers Using Certified EMR Technology

Contra Cost Health Plan Quality Program Summary November, 2013

Medicare Benefit Review

Clinical Quality Measure Crosswalk: HEDIS, Meaningful Use, PQRS, PCMH, Beacon, 10 SOW

Population Health Management Program

Florida Medicaid: Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services

Your Guide to Medicare Special Needs Plans (SNPs)

The Healthy Michigan Plan Handbook

Did you know? There are 19 HEDIS/pharmacy measures currently used to gather data for provider reports.

2010 QARR QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE Adults

MaineCare Value Based Purchasing Initiative

ACO Name and Location Allina Health Minneapolis, Minnesota

Medicare Basics and Medicare Advantage

CAHPS Survey for the Medicare Shared Savings Program and Pioneer Model ACOs. Report for: ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATION

Special Needs Plan Model of Care 101

Transcription:

Stakeholder feedback is requested on the following: 1) metrics 69 through 94; and 2) withhold measures for years 1, 2, and 3. Steward/ 1 Antidepressant medication management Percentage of members 18 years of age and older who were diagnosed with a new episode of major depression and treated with antidepressant medication, and who remained on an antidepressant medication treatment. 2 Initiation and engagement of Alcohol and Other Drug Dependence Treatment The percentage of adolescent and adult members with a new episode of alcohol or other drug (AOD) dependence who received the following. Initiation of AOD Treatment. The percentage of members who initiate treatment through an inpatient AOD admission, outpatient visit, intensive outpatient encounter or partial hospitalization within 14 days of the diagnosis. Engagement of AOD Treatment. The percentage of members who initiated treatment and who had two or more additional services with a diagnosis of AOD within 30 days of the initiation visit. 3 Follow-up After Hospitalization for Mental Illness Percentage of discharges for members 6 years of age and older who were hospitalized for treatment of selected mental health disorders and who had an outpatient visit, an intensive outpatient encounter or Y2, Y3 partial hospitalization with a mental health practitioner. 4 Screening for Clinical Depression and Follow-up Percentage of patients ages 18 years and older screened for clinical depression using a standardized tool and follow-up plan documented. The organization coordinates services for members with complex conditions and helps them access needed resources. Element A: Identifying Members for Case Management Element B: Access to Case Management Element C: Case Management Systems Element D: Frequency of Member Identification 5 SNP1: Complex Case Management Element E: Providing Members with Element F: Case Management Assessment NCQA/ HEDIS Process Element G: Individualized Plan Element H: Informing and Educating Practitioners Element I: Satisfaction with Case Management Element J: Analyzing Effectiveness/Identifying Opportunities Element K: Implementing Interventions and Followup Evaluation CMS Y2, Y3 Page 1 of 9

Steward/ 6 The organization coordinates Medicare and Medicaid benefits and services for members. Element A: Coordination of Benefits for Dual Eligible Members Element B: Administrative Coordination of D-SNPs SNP 6: Coordination of Medicare and Element C: Administrative Coordination for Chronic Medicaid Benefits Condition and Institutional Benefit Packages (May not be applicable for demos) NCQA/ HEDIS Element D: Service Coordination Element E: Network Adequacy Assessment 7 Transition Record Transmitted to Health Professional Percentage of patients, regardless of age, discharged from an inpatient facility to home or any other site of care for whom a transition record was transmitted to the facility or primary physician or other health care professional designated for followup care within 24 hours of discharge. AMA-PCPI 8 Reconciliation After Discharge from Inpatient Facility Percent of patients 65 years or older discharged from any inpatient facility and seen within 60 days following discharge by the physician providing ongoing care who had a reconciliation of the discharge medications with the current medication list in the medical record documented 9 SNP 4: Transitions The organization manages the process of care transitions, identifies problems that could cause transitions and where possible prevents unplanned transitions. Element A: Managing Transitions Element B: Supporting Members through Transitions Element C: Analyzing Performance CAHPS, various settings including: Element D: Identifying Unplanned Transitions Element E; Analyzing Transitions Element F: Reducing Transitions -Health Plan plus supplemental items/questions, including: 10 - of and Health Outcomes for Behavioral Health (ECHO) -Home Health Depends on Survey -Nursing Home -People with Mobility Impariments -Cultural Competence -Patient Centered Medical Home Page 2 of 9

Steward/ 11 Call Center Pharmacy Hold Time How long pharmacists wait on hold when they call the drug plan s pharmacy help desk. CMS & Call Center data 12 Call Center Foreign Language Interpreter and TTY/TDD Availability Percent of the time that TTY/TDD services and foreign language interpretation were available when CMS & Call Center needed by members who called the drug plan s data customer service phone number. 13 Appeals Auto Forward 14 Appeals Upheld 15 Enrollment Timeliness 16 Complaints about the Drug Plan How often the drug plan did not meet Medicare s deadlines for timely appeals decisions. This measure is defined as the rate of cases autoforwarded to the Independent Review Entity (IRE) because decision timeframes for coverage determinations or redeterminations were exceeded by the plan. This is calculated as: [(Total number of cases auto-forwarded to the IRE) / (Average Medicare enrollment)] * 10,000. IRE How often an independent reviewer agrees with the drug plan's decision to deny or say no to a member s appeal. This measure is defined as the IRE percent of IRE confirmations of upholding the plans decisions. This is calculated as: [(Number of cases upheld) / (Total number of cases reviewed)] * 100. The percentage of enrollment requests that the plan transmits to the Medicare program within 7 days. How many complaints Medicare received about the drug plan. For each contract, this rate is calculated as: [(Total number of complaints logged into the CTM for the drug plan regarding any issues) / (Average Contract enrollment)] * 1,000 * 30 / (Number of Days in Period). Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug System (MARx) CMS & CTM data 17 Beneficiary Access and Performance Problems To check on whether members are having problems getting access to care and to be sure that plans are following all of Medicare s rules, Medicare conducts audits and other types of reviews. Medicare gives the plan a lower score (from 0 to CMS & 100) when it finds problems. The score combines Administrative data how severe the problems were, how many there were, and how much they affect plan members directly. A higher score is better, as it means Medicare found fewer problems. 18 Members Choosing to Leave the Plan The percent of drug plan members who chose to leave the plan in 2013. CMS & Medicare Beneficiary Database Suite of Systems Page 3 of 9

Steward/ 19 MPF Accuracy 20 High Risk The accuracy of how the Plan Finder data match the PDS data The percent of the drug plan members who get prescriptions for certain drugs with a high risk of serious side effects, when there may be safer drug choices. CMS, PDE data, MPF Pricing Files, HPMS approved formulary extracts, and data from First DataBank and Medispan CMS & PDE data 21 Diabetes Treatment Percentage of Medicare beneficiaries who were dispensed a medication for diabetes and a medication for hypertension who were receiving an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) medication which are recommended for people with diabetes. CMS & PDE data 22 Adherence for Oral Diabetes s Percent of plan members with a prescription for oral diabetes medication who fill their prescription often enough to cover 80% or more of the time they are supposed to be taking the medication. CMS & PDE data Y2, Y3 23 Adherence for Hypertension (ACEI or ARB) Percent of plan members with a prescription for a blood pressure medication who fill their prescription CMS & PDE data often enough to cover 80% or more of the time they are supposed to be taking the medication 24 Adherence for Cholesterol (Statins) Percent of plan members with a prescription for a cholesterol medication (a statin drug) who fill their prescription often enough to cover 80% or more of the time they are supposed to be taking the medication. CMS & PDE data 25 Plan Makes Timely Decisions about Appeals 26 Reviewing Appeals Decisions Percent of plan members who got a timely response when they made a written appeal to the health plan about a decision to refuse payment or coverage. How often an independent reviewer agrees with the plan's decision to deny or say no to a member s appeal. IRE IRE 27 Call Center Foreign Language Interpreter and TTY/TDD Availability Percent of the time that the TTY/TDD services and foreign language interpretation were available when CMS & Call Center needed by members who called the health plan s data customer service phone number. Page 4 of 9

Steward/ 28 Percent of High Risk Residents with Pressure Ulcers (Long Stay) Percentage of all long-stay residents in a nursing facility with an annual, quarterly, significant change or significant correction MDS assessment during the selected quarter (3-month period) who were identified as high risk and who have one or more Stage 2-4 pressure ulcer(s). NQF endorsed 29 Risk assessments Percent of members with initial assessments completed within 90 days of enrollment Y1? 30 Individualized care plans Percent of members with care plans by specified timeframe 31 32 Real time hospital admission notifications Risk stratification based on LTSS or other factors 33 Discharge follow-up Percent of hospital admission notifications occurring within specified timeframe Percent of risk stratifications using BH/LTSS data/indicators Percent of members with specified timeframe between discharge to first follow-up visit 34 Self-direction Percent of care coordinators that have undergone State-based training for supporting self-direction under the Demonstration 35 for Older Adults Review Percent of plan members whose doctor or clinical pharmacist has reviewed a list of everything they take (prescription and non-prescription drugs, vitamins, herbal remedies, other supplements) at least once a year. NCQA/ HEDIS 36 for Older Adults Functional Status Assessment Percent of plan members whose doctor has done a functional status assessment to see how well they are doing activities of daily living (such as dressing, eating, and bathing). 37 for Older Adults Pain Screening 38 Diabetes Eye Exam 39 40 Diabetes - Kidney Monitoring Diabetes Blood Sugar Controlled 41 Rheumatoid Arthritis Management 42 Reducing the Risk of Falling Percent of plan members who had a pain screening or pain management plan at least once during the year. Percent of plan members with diabetes who had an eye exam to check for damage from diabetes during the year. Percent of plan members with diabetes who had a kidney function test during the year Percent of plan members with diabetes who had an A-1-C lab test during the year that showed their average blood sugar is under control. Percent of plan members with Rheumatoid Arthritis who got one or more prescription(s) for an antirheumatic drug. Percent of members with a problem falling, walking or balancing who discussed it with their doctor and got treatment for it during the year.? & HOS? Y2, Y3 Page 5 of 9

43 Plan All-Cause Readmissions 44 Controlling Blood Pressure 45 Comprehensive medication review 46 Complaints about the Health Plan Steward/ Percent of members discharged from a hospital stay who were readmitted to a hospital within 30 days, either from the same condition as their recent Y2, Y3 hospital stay or for a different reason. Percentage of members 18-85 years of age who had a diagnosis of hypertension and whose blood pressure was adequately controlled (<140/90) Y2, Y3 during the measurement year. Percentage of beneficiaries who received a Pharmacy comprehensive medication review (CMR) out of Alliance (PQA) those who were offered a CMR.? How many complaints Medicare received about the health plan. Rate of complaints about the health plan per 1,000 members. For each contract, this rate is calculated as: [(Total number of all complaints logged into the CTM) / (Average Contract enrollment)] * 1,000 * 30 / (Number of Days in Period). CMS & CTM data 47 Beneficiary Access and Performance Problems To check on whether members are having problems getting access to care and to be sure that plans are following all of Medicare s rules, Medicare conducts audits and other types of reviews. Medicare gives the plan a lower score (from 0 to CMS & Beneficiary 100) when it finds problems. The score combines database how severe the problems were, how many there were, and how much they affect plan members directly. A higher score is better, as it means Medicare found fewer problems?? 48 Members Choosing to Leave the The percent of plan members who chose to leave Plan the plan in 2013. CMS The percent of the best possible score that the plan earned on how easy it is for members to get information from their drug plan about prescription drug coverage and cost. -In the last 6 months, how often did your health plan s customer service give you the information or help you needed about prescription drugs? -In the last 6 months, how often did your plan s 49 Getting From Drug Plan customer service staff treat you with courtesy and respect when you tried to get information or help about prescription drugs? -In the last 6 months, how often did your health plan give you all the information you needed about prescription medication were covered? -In the last 6 months, how often did your health plan give you all the information you needed about how much you would have to pay for your prescription medicine? The percent of the best possible score that the drug plan earned from members who rated the drug plan for its coverage of prescription drugs. Page 6 of 9

Steward/ 50 51 52 Rating of Drug Plan Getting Needed Prescription Drugs Getting Needed -Using any number from 0 to 10, where 0 is the worst prescription drug plan possible and 10 is the best prescription drug plan possible, what number would you use to rate your health plan for coverage of prescription drugs? The percent of best possible score that the plan earned on how easy it is for members to get the prescription drugs they need using the plan. -In the last 6 months, how often was it easy to use your health plan to get the medicines your doctor prescribed? -In the last six months, how often was it easy to use your health plan to fill a prescription at a local pharmacy? Percent of best possible score the plan earned on how easy it is to get needed care, including care from specialists. In the last 6 months, how often was it easy to get appointments with specialists? In the last 6 months, how often was it easy to get the care, tests, or treatment you needed through your health plan? Percent of best possible score the plan earned on how quickly members get appointments and care. 53 Getting Appointments and Quickly In the last 6 months, when you needed care right away, how often did you get care as soon as you thought you needed? In the last 6 months, not counting the times when you needed care right away, 54 How often did you get an appointment for your health care at a doctor's office or clinic as soon as you thought you needed? Percent of best possible score the plan earned from plan members who rated the overall health care received. Overall Rating of Health Using any number from 0 to 10, where 0 is the worst health care possible and 10 is the best health care possible, what number would you use to rate all your health care in the last 6 months? Percent of best possible score the plan earned from plan members who rated the overall plan. 55 Overall Rating of Plan Using any number from 0 to 10, where 0 is the worst health plan possible and 10 is the best health plan possible, what number would you use to rate your health plan? 56 Breast Cancer Screening 57 Colorectal Cancer Screening 58 59 Cardiovascular Cholesterol Screening Diabetes Cholesterol Screening Percent of female plan members aged 40-69 who had a mammogram during the past 2 years. NCQA/ HEDIS Percent of plan members aged 50-75 who had appropriate screening for colon cancer. Percent of plan members with heart disease who have had a test for bad (LDL) cholesterol within the past year. Percent of plan members with diabetes who have had a test for bad (LDL) cholesterol within the past year. Page 7 of 9

60 Annual Flu Vaccine 61 Improving or Maintaining Mental Health 62 Monitoring Physical Activity 63 Access to Primary Doctor Visits 64 Access to Specialists Steward/ Percent of plan members who got a vaccine (flu & shot) prior to flu season. Survey data Y2, Y3 Percent of all plan members whose mental health was the same or better than expected after two CMS & HOS years. Percent of senior plan members who discussed exercise with their doctor and were advised to start, HEDIS / HOS increase or maintain their physical activity during the year. Percent of all plan members who saw their primary HEDIS care doctor during the year.? Proportion of respondents who report that it is always easy to get appointment with specialists 65 Getting Quickly Composite of access to urgent care 66 Being Examined on the Examination Percentage of respondents who report always table being examined on the examination table 67 Help with Transportation Composite of getting needed help with transportation?? 68 Health Status/Function Status Percent of members who report their health as excellent Development of Coordination Plans on a timely 69 basis for beneficiaries identified at highest risk through Health Risk Assessment (TBD) 70 Transition Record Transmitted to Health (AMA-PCPI)? Professional 71 Percentage of patients, regardless of age, discharged from an inpatient facility to home or any Transition Record with other sites of care, or their caregivers(s), who Specified elements Received AMA-PCI received a transition record at the time of discharge by Discharged Patients including, at a minimum, all of the specified elements. 72 Percent of new members completing a health risk? assessment Behavioral Health Shared 73 Accountability Process Y1. (year 1) 74 Behavioral Health Shared Accountability Enhanced Process for Evidence of Data Sharing and Joint Planning (Year 2) and Reduction in Emergency? Y2, Y3 Department Use for Seriously Mentally Ill (SMI) and Substance Use Disorder (SUD) Enrollees (Year 3) 75 Complaints and appeals 76 Disenrollment Rate for Cause New state-specific measure Y1? 77 Physician Access Review encounter data pre and post enrollment for changes in physician visits Page 8 of 9

Steward/ 78 Psychiatric bed days 79 ER utilization rates 80 30 day readmission rate 81 Increasing medication adherence? 82 Nursing facility utilization measures 83 LTSS consumer control and participation in decisionmaking, caregiver participation, social support. National Core Indicators Project (needs review)? Proportion of those deemed at risk for LTSS who 84 received a comprehensive assessment that included physical and cognitive function assessment Degree to which consumers 85 experience an increased level of functioning; 86 Unmet need in ADLs/IADLs; Unmet need in ADLs/IADLs, and community involvement. 87 Degree to which health status is maintained and improved; 88 Case manager contact with Ability to identify case manager or contact member case manager 89 LTSS consumer satisfaction Satisfaction with case manager, home measures workers, personal care. 90 Improved Behavioral health focused HEDIS measures Encounter data submitted accurately and 91 Encounter Data completely in compliance with contract requirements 92 Consumer Governance Board 93 Customer Service (for CY 2014) 94 Access to (for CY 2014) Modified CAHPS? CMS/State defined process measure?? Establishment of consumer advistory CMS/State board or inclusion of consumers on defined process governance board consistent with contract measure requirements Y1 Percent of best possible score the plan earned on how easy it is to get information Y1? and help when needed. Percent of respondents who always or usually were able to access care quickly Y1? when they needed it. Y1 Page 9 of 9