2014/2015 US COMPENSATION PLANNING SURVEY A study of salary increases, incentive compensation, and emerging practices



Similar documents
Looking Ahead to 2015 Trends in Workforce and Executive Rewards October 7, Jennifer Lavinbuk Stephen McGillivray

THE MOST IMPORTANT COMPENSATION PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS FOR 2015

GLOBAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT TRENDS

2016 SALARY BUDGET REPORT

Merit Pay Planning and Implementation Guide

Incentive Plan Design and Employee Recognition Programs. June 11, 2008

BUILDING A BETTER PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM QUARTER

Current Trends and Issues in Banking Compensation and Benefits Programs

ATTRACTING AND RETAINING CRITICAL TALENT THROUGH REWARDS SEGMENTATION AT MICROSOFT

Leading Through Uncertain Times

Staff Classification and

Salary Structure Policies and Practices. research. A report by WorldatWork and Deloitte Consulting LLP October 2012

PRE-IPO/VENTURE-BACKED PAY PLANNING Getting Your Startup s Compensation House in Order By Brett Harsen, Vice President

What specific talent groups will be necessary to achieving strategic business goals?

Variable Incentive Pay Compensation Plans Guidelines & Principles

BOARD OF TRUSTEES MINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES BOARD ACTION. Fiscal Years Biennial Operating Budget

Human. Rısk. By Matt Shadrick and Seymour Adler, Ph.D., Aon Consulting Worldwide

Trends in Global Employee Engagement

Survey Findings. HR Outsourcing Trends and Insights 2009

Human Resources FY Performance Plan

METRICS TO HELP IMPROVE YOUR WORKFORCE PRODUCTIVITY

Iowa State University University Human Resources Classification and Compensation Unit 3810 Beardshear Hall

<Insert Picture Here> JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Human Resources

Salary Scale Study E V E R G R E E N S O L U T I O N S, LLC

Fourth Quarter 2014 Published by HRO Today Magazine in Cooperation with Yoh Recruitment Process Outsourcing

2015 State of the CIO SURVEY. Exclusive Research from CIO magazine

Faculty compensation is a vital issue,

HR Strategic Plan

Compensation Models in Home Health

DON T GET LOST IN THE FOG OF BIG DATA

HR AND BENEFITS: T HE N E X T O U T S O U R C I N G WAV E

EMPLOYEE PROPOSED COMPENSATION PLAN- Subject of Public Hearing CENTERVILLE CITY SALARY ADMINISTRATION GUIDELINES- FY 2013

GLOBAL. a guidebook for. sales compensation pay mix. Global compensation structures should be companyspecific.

Job levelling solutions

The HR Image Makeover: From Cost Center to Profit Maker

Cost Reduction & Engagement Survey

2013 GLOBAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SURVEY REPORT

HUMAN RESOURCES IN PUBLIC EDUCATION Where are we? Where should we be? Where HR Divisions should be. Where most HR Divisions are

Annual Total Compensation Survey Process Meet and Confer - May 2014

NYISO Compensation Program

The hidden reality of payroll & HR administration costs

OVERVIEW OF CURRENT SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS

JOB OPENINGS AND LABOR TURNOVER APRIL 2015

The Contributions of the Film & Video Production Industries to Oregon s Economy in 2005

Private Company Incentive Pay Practices. research. A Research Report by WorldatWork and Vivient Consulting October 2007

COMPENSATION, RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS TRENDS REPORT NON-PROFIT INDUSTRY

OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY PAY PRACTICES ADMINISTRATION FOR AP FACULTY

Oracle Buys Taleo Adds Leading Talent Management Cloud Offering to the Oracle Public Cloud

and employer contribution rate than either dependent or retiree coverage throughout the state.

CIMA SALARY SURVEY Zambia

Compensation Programs and Practices research. A report by WorldatWork, October 2012

management strategies

Worcester Center Based Early Education and Care

STRATEGIC WORKFORCE PLANNING LATEST TRENDS AND LEADING PRACTICE EXAMPLES

CORPORATE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL PAGE 2 THE USE OF COMPETENCIES IN PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS

THE COMPENSATION FUNCTION UP CLOSE QUARTER 1, 2003; VOLUME 3 REVISED: QUARTER 2, 2007

Executive Compensation Trends. A Presentation for The CFO Alliance January 10, 2013

2014 HIMSS Workforce Survey AUGUST 2014

Multiply the appropriate hourly equivalent times the hours listed (round up if third decimal place is 5 or greater).

WORKFORCE ENGAGEMENT IN SAUDI ARABIA WHAT S WORKING FOR SAUDI NATIONALS AND WHAT EMPLOYERS NEED TO KNOW

Sage HRMS I Planning Guide

Workday Human Capital Management Suite

UFF-FUSA/Mercer Salary Study CONTRACT

OVERCOMING FIELD SERVICE & REVERSE LOGISTICS CHALLENGES WITH AN INTEGRATED, BEST OF BREED ENTERPRISE SERVICE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

HR.com Whitepaper. Driving Successful HR Leadership: Talent Management s Role in Core Business Strategy

2010 Grantmakers Salary and Benefits Report KEY FINDINGS

A CFO s Guide to Creating a High Performance Organization: Workforce Management Best Practices

Getting More from APPA s Annual Report on Financial and Operating Ratios

Florida Hospitals Workforce Challenges: 2012 Workforce Survey Highlights

Human Resources Talent Management. people make the difference

BUILDING A SUCCESSFUL BUSINESS CASE FOR TALENT MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY By Kelly McCombs and Tim Welsh, AON Hewitt

Federal Aviation Administration Core Compensation Consulting Services Market Survey

31 May Compensation and Benefits Competitiveness Toronto Hydro Corporation

Improving Dealership Operations With the DCM Dealer Capabilities Model

PERFORMANCE & DEVELOPMENT PLANNING (PDP) RETURN ON INVESTMENT (ROI) ASSESSMENT

IT Workforce snapshot

ASTA Agency Sales & Revenue Trends Comparison of Full Year 2014 with Full Year 2013

Stop Tying Pay to Performance Really?

2016 ASIA PACIFIC HIGH TECH TOTAL REMUNERATION DATABASE

ORACLE FUSION WORKFORCE COMPENSATION

HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT

Competitive Pay Policy

Transcription:

2014/2015 US COMPENSATION PLANNING SURVEY A study of salary increases, incentive compensation, and emerging practices EXECUTIVE SUMMARY More than 1,500 organizations provided data for Mercer s 2014/2015 US Compensation Planning Survey. The survey data represents the salary practices for more than 16 million workers. The year s results indicate that most employers will provide salary increases and increase amounts appear to have stabilized at around 3.0%. Here are some of the key findings: The actual 2014 base salary increase budget for all employees is 2.9% (including 0s). This increase is consistent with the projected amount from the 2013 fall survey update and the amount projected in April, 2013. The overwhelming majority (98%) of participating organizations are awarding salary increases in 2014. Most organizations (85%) that reported a salary freeze for 2013 are providing increases in 2014. Salary increases for 2015 are expected to rise slightly to 3.0% (including 0s), with 99% of organizations planning to provide increases. Most organizations (91%) provide salary increases to their employees on a fixed date. Approximately onequarter of organizations that provide increases on a fixed date, provide such an increase in the month of April with the next most common months being March and January. Less than 3% of participating organizations reported freezing salaries for at least one employee group in 2014; this is down from the 6.5% reported for 2013. The Executive employee group is impacted the most with 4.0% of organizations instituting freezes in 2014; however, by 2015 this is expected to decline considerably to 1.1%. Salary Freezes Actual 2013 Actual 2014 Projected 2015 All Employees 6.5% 2.5% 0.7% Executive 8.3% 4.0% 1.1% Management 6.4% 2.3% 0.6% Professional (Sales & Non-Sales) 5.9% 2.1% 0.6% Office/Clerical/Technician 6.1% 2.0% 0.6% Trades/Production/Service 5.4% 2.0% 0.7% 2014/2015 US Compensation Planning Survey 1 2014 Mercer LLC

BASE SALARY INCREASES While salary increase budgets continue to remain modest in 2014, a slight increase is expected in 2015. Organizations with salary budgets that are projected to be higher for 2015 indicated that the primary reason for the increase is due to greater competition for their workforce or anticipated labor shortages. However, organizations that have lowered their 2015 budgets (compared to 2014) indicated they are doing so in response to further economic uncertainty or as a general cost reduction initiative. The table below provides actual 2013, actual 2014 and projected 2015 salary increases by employee group. Salary Increases Actual 2013 (excl 0s)* Actual 2013 (incl 0s)* Actual 2014 (excl 0s) Actual 2014 (incl 0s) Projected 2015 (excl 0s) Projected 2015 (incl 0s) All Employees 2.9% 2.8% 2.9% 2.9% 3.0% 3.0% Executive 3.0% 2.8% 3.1% 2.9% 3.0% 3.0% Management 2.9% 2.8% 2.9% 2.9% 3.0% 3.0% Professional (Sales & Non-Sales) 2.9% 2.8% 2.9% 2.9% 3.0% 3.0% Office/Clerical/Technician 2.9% 2.8% 2.9% 2.8% 3.0% 3.0% Trades/Production/Service 2.9% 2.8% 2.9% 2.8% 2.9% 2.9% Percentages are averages. *Actual 2013 numbers from the 2013/2014 US Compensation Planning Survey 2014/2015 US Compensation Planning Survey 2 2014 Mercer LLC

SALARY INCREASES BY INDUSTRY The graph below provides average base salary increases for industry sectors. Similar to last year, the Energy sector is providing considerably higher increases in 2014 and 2015, relative to other industries. It should be noted that the industries included in the Energy sector have changed this year and now align with Mercer s global list of industries. The primary impact of this change is the inclusion of the Utilities industry, which accounts for approximately half of the Energy sector sample and has slightly lower budgets than other Energy industries. Industry specific analyses are accessible in PayMonitor and can also be found on page 9 of the full report. The Services (Non-Financial) industry is providing lower than average increases and will see minimal changes in the amounts provided in 2014 and 2015. The Mining and Metals industry has experienced the most significant change in budget amounts; salary increase budgets are approximately 0.3% higher in 2015, compared to 2014. 4.0% Actual 2014 Projected 2015 3.5% 3.0% 2.5% 2.0% Consumer Goods Energy Financial Services High Tech Insurance Life Sciences Mining & Metals Other Durable Goods Manufacturing Other Non Durable Goods Manufacturing Other Non Manufacturing Retail & Wholesale Services (Non- Financial) Transportation Equipment Averages include freezes (0s). 2014/2015 US Compensation Planning Survey 3 2014 Mercer LLC

SALARY INCREASES BY REGION Approximately 5% of participating organizations vary their salary increase budgets by region. Variances across regions are very small with a maximum range of 0.2% for 2013, 2014 and 2015. In 2014, the North Central and South Central budgets are in line with the national average of 2.9%. Northeast, Southeast, and West Coast regions are slightly below. In 2015, the North Central, South Central, and West Coast regions are projecting an increase of 3.0% (which is in line with the national average). Northeast and Southeast regions are slightly below. The graph below provides base salary increases by region. 3.1% 2013 2014 Projected 2015 3.0% 2.9% 2.8% 2.7% 2.6% 2.5% National Northeast Southeast North Central South Central West Coast Averages include freezes (0s). 2014/2015 US Compensation Planning Survey 4 2014 Mercer LLC

PROMOTIONAL INCREASE BUDGETS Approximately 36% of participating organizations indicated that promotional increases are budgeted separately from merit increases. For organizations that budget promotional increases separately, employees are typically awarded a 7% promotional increase and budgets are around 0.9% of payroll. The percentage of employee promotions by level is relatively consistent, ranging from 6.5% at the Management level to 7.6% at the Professional (Sales and Non-Sales) level. The graph below provides average promotional increases awarded (as a percentage of base salary) and the percentage of employees receiving a promotional increase. Typical award as % of base salary % of group promoted 8.5% 8.5% 8.0% 8.0% 7.5% 7.5% 7.0% 7.0% 6.5% 6.5% 6.0% 6.0% 5.5% 5.5% 5.0% 5.0% All Employee Groups Executive Management Professional Office/Clerical/ Technician Trades/Production/ Services The value for % of group promoted for All Employee Groups represents organization weighted mean. 2014/2015 US Compensation Planning Survey 5 2014 Mercer LLC

SALARY STRUCTURES The majority of participating organizations (83%) reported having a formal salary structure and most of these organizations (79%) indicated their structure uses traditional grades (e.g., min-mid-max; 50% range spread). Almost all of these organizations have a formal salary structure for their Management, Professional (Sales & Non Sales), and Office/Clerical/Technician employee groups. More than half of organizations (68%) update their salary structure on an annual basis. Of those organizations that have a formal salary structure, 67% are adjusting their structure in 2014 and 73% in 2015. The table below provides the average percentage by which the structure will be adjusted in 2014 and 2015 for each employee group. 2.5% Actual 2014 Projected 2015 2.4% 2.3% 2.2% 2.1% 2.0% All Employee Groups Executive Management Professional Office/Clerical/ Technician Trades/Production/ Services 2014/2015 US Compensation Planning Survey 6 2014 Mercer LLC

LUMP SUM PAYMENTS More than half of participating organizations (54%) award lump sum payments in lieu of all or a portion of salary increases. Lump sum payments are most commonly used when an employee s salary is above their salary range (red circled) as indicated by 94% of organizations. Payments are most often provided to Management, Professional (Sales & Non Sales), and Office/Clerical/Technician employee groups. The graph below provides the percentage of organizations using lump sum payments by ownership type. Organizations Using Lump Sum Payments by Ownership Type (N=803) Not-for-Profit 21% Joint Venture 1% State-Owned Enterprise 5% Publicly Traded 50% Private Organization 23% 2014/2015 US Compensation Planning Survey 7 2014 Mercer LLC

INCENTIVES The vast majority of participating organizations (83%) have incentive plans for at least one segment of their employee population. Publicly traded organizations are more likely to provide incentives to all employee groups; their target awards begin at 5% of base salary for Office/Clerical/Technician and Trades/Production/Service employees, and range to 47% of base salary for Executives. The table below provides median short-term incentive targets (as a percentage of base salary) by ownership type for each employee group. All Organizations Ownership Type Executive Management Target % of base salary N Target % of base salary N Professional (Non-Sales) Target % of base salary N Professional (Sales) Target % of base salary N Office/ Clerical/Tech Target % of base salary N Trades/Prod/ Service Target % of base salary Publicly Traded 47% 367 20% 412 10% 354 20% 205 5% 280 5% 187 Privately Held 38% 177 17% 191 10% 145 20% 205 5% 103 5% 63 Not-for-Profit 25% 105 12% 100 7% 68 11% 45 5% 60 5% 29 Joint Venture --% 4 10% 6 8% 6 --% 3 --% 4 --% 2 State-Owned Enterprise 18% 11 10% 12 7% 7 9% 8 5% 6 5% 5 *Unless otherwise stated, 0 s are excluded in all calculations. Targets are median values. Participating organizations were asked to provide the weighting of four levels of performance measures used to determine incentive awards for each employee group. Executives are typically expected to have the most impact on the organization s performance which is reflected with a weighting of 63%. The graph below provides the performance measure weightings by employee group. N 100% 75% Individual 50% Department 25% Division Organization 0% All Employee Groups Executive Management Professional (Non-Sales) Professional (Sales) Office/Clerical/ Technician Trades/Production/ Services 2014/2015 US Compensation Planning Survey 8 2014 Mercer LLC

SALARY DIFFERENTIATION Organizations are continuing to differentiate pay for performance. More than half of organizations (56%) differentiate performance using a five level rating system; 19% use a four level rating system and 14% use a three level system. Employees with the highest performance rating can expect to receive a salary increase of approximately 4.8% in 2015. The table below provides a summary of pay differentiation by employee group for organizations with five performance rating categories. Actual 2014 (N=908) Projected 2015 (N=738) Performance Rating % of Workforce Avg Increase % of Workforce Avg Increase Highest 8% 4.8% 8% 4.8% Next Highest 28% 3.7% 25% 3.7% Middle 57% 2.6% 57% 2.7% Low 7% 0.9% 8% 0.9% Lowest 2% 0.1% 3% 0.1% * Based on organizations with 5 performance categories. Percentages include 0s and are average values. Percent of workforce may not equal 100% due to rounding. The percentage of the workforce receiving each rating has remained fairly constant since 2012. The table below compares the distribution of performance ratings across the workforce over the last three years. Actual 2012 % of Workforce Actual 2013 % of Workforce Actual 2014 % of Workforce Highest 8% 7% 8% Next Highest 29% 30% 28% Middle 54% 54% 57% Low 7% 7% 7% Lowest 2% 2% 2% * Based on organizations with 5 performance categories. 2014/2015 US Compensation Planning Survey 9 2014 Mercer LLC

ATTRACTION AND RETENTION Organizations were provided with a list of job families and employee levels and asked to select the combinations that were the most difficult to recruit and the most difficult to retain. Professional Non-Sales IT employees were identified as the most difficult to recruit (18.6%) and retain (15.9%), followed by Professional Engineering employees, with 12.2% of organizations experiencing recruitment difficulties and 10.2% retention difficulties. Top 3 Difficult to Recruit Job Families and Levels: 1. IT Professional (Non-Sales) 18.6% 2. Engineering Professional (Non-Sales) 12.2% 3. Sales Professional (Sales) 6.4% Top 3 Difficult to Retain Job Families and Levels: 1. IT Professional (Non-Sales) 15.9% 2. Engineering Professional (Non-Sales) 10.2% 3. Sales Professional (Sales) 7.2% HOT TOPICS FOR 2014/2015 CAREER FRAMEWORK Approximately one-third of organizations (34%) indicated that they currently have a career framework to manage talent programs. An additional 30% of organizations do not currently have a career framework in place but are planning to implement one. A career framework is defined as an organization-wide series of career levels with defined accountabilities and competencies. For organizations with a career framework in place, 46% use a oneto-one direct link from career levels to salary grades and 34% have multiple salary grades embedded in a single career level. PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE The majority of organizations (82%) have a pay-for-performance philosophy as part of their compensation philosophy. However, only 22% of these organizations measure the effectiveness of their pay-for-performance program. For those organizations that measure the effectiveness of their program, 68% indicated their program is somewhat effective and a further 30% indicated their program is very effective. ADMINISTRATION OF SALARY INCREASES Organizations typically use either an automated manager self-service web-based tool or Excel spreadsheets to administer the salary increase process. Approximately one-quarter of organizations are currently implementing and one-quarter of organizations are planning to implement technology based solutions to manage annual salary increases. PLANNING FOR 2015 The most common factor influencing compensation decisions for 2015 is a concern with retention and losing good employees (68%) followed by the need to buy talent from the external labor market (59%). Additional Information Additional analysis from the Mercer 2014/2015 US Compensation Planning Survey, including detailed reports by industry and region, is available. Phone: 800 333 3070 Email: surveys@imercer.com Website: imercer.com/cps 2014/2015 US Compensation Planning Survey 10 2014 Mercer LLC