How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Man From Selling A Car To A Woman



Similar documents
GRANTED. Robert L. McGahey, Jr. District Court Judge

APPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on

COURT USE ONLY COMPLAINT

STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff,

DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII

Case 1:11-cv RBJ-KLM Document 285 Filed 07/29/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

DISTRICT COURT, DENVER COUNTY, COLORADO

MEDVED DALE DECKER & DEERE, LLC; FOOTHILLS TITLE AND ESCROW, INC.; TONI M.N. DALE; HOLLY L. DECKER; and HEATHER L. DEERE,

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

How To Sue A Magazine Publisher In Cocolorado

APPLICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION (6)(A), C.R.S. 2013

DISTRICT COURT. EL PASO COUNTY. COLORADO 270 S. Tejon Colorado Springs, Colorado STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOH1. W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Plaintiff, GREEN RIVER MORTGAGE, INC., and DIMITRY YAKUBOVICH, individually.

DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION CONSENT DECREE. WHEREAS: Plaintiff, the United States of America, has

DEPARTMENT OF LAW STATE OF COLORADO ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE. IN THE MATTER OF: BASIL JEROME BAD WAN d/b/a HAWK FINANCIAL SERVICES Respondent.

APPENDIX A IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Plaintiffs, JANEWAY LAW FIRM, P.C. and LYNN M. JANEWAY,

GRANTED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on

DEFENDANT DEBRA JOHNSON S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (Rule 12(c) and 12(h)(2))

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO

SECRETARY'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT DEBRA JOHNSON S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

Plaintiffs, LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL P. MEDVED, P.C.; WISE POSTS, LLC; MICHAEL P. MEDVED; TRACIE D. CASTANON; BETH A. MALONEY; and PATRICK R.

EX ahcaagreement.htm AHCA AGREEMENT Back to Form 8-K Exhibit 10.1

CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff LIFESTREAM PURIFICATION SYSTEMS, LLC. DALLAS COUNTY, T E X A S

The Defendants, by and through counsel, the Office of the Attorney General, submit the following Answer to Plaintiffs Complaint.

THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) is entered into by the States

SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,

FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT

Plaintiffs, -against- IAS Part 5 Justice Kathryn E. Freed. WHEREAS Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York

Case5:12-cv EJD Document55-4 Filed05/01/14 Page1 of 19 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 0:15-cv WJZ Document 6-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21

Errors and Omissions Insurance. 1.0 Introduction and Definition

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS 3rd DIVISION CONSENT JUDGMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

SECRETARY S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO COLORADO COMMON CAUSE S SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM

CLS Investments, LLC Instructions for the Solicitor Application and Agreement

Case No. CV Plaintiff, the State ofidaho, Department of Finance ("Department"), and Defendant, Bart

SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF WAKE 13 CVS 16487

STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, and LAURA E. UDIS, ADMINISTRATOR, UNIFORM CONSUMER CREDIT CODE, Plaintiffs,

CONSENT ORDER (As to Respondents North America Marketing, LLC and TM Multimedia Marketing, LLC)

DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, COLORADO. 100 Jefferson County Parkway Golden, Colorado 80401

Settlement Agreement. This Settlement Agreement ( Agreement ) is entered into between and among (i) the

NO. ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE. COME NOW, THE STATE OF TEXAS, acting by and through Attorney General GREG

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 206 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 10 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #:

STATE OF MINNESOTA BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA DOMESTIC RELATIONS PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION 140

MODIFICATION, TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION OF TEMPORARY DISABILITY BENEFITS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Page 1 of 8

SCREEN SPECIALISTS and RICHARD REUSCH, individually, stipulate that the ultrasound. are prescription devices as cleared for marketing by the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Title 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES

In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF

FILE NO. 11 CV ) ) ) THIS CAUSE came on before the undersigned judge for entry ofa Consent Judgment. It

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

How To Get The Lesser Prairie Chicken To Live Outside Of The Coon Line

COLORADO INDEPENDENT ETHICS COMMISSION S TRIAL BRIEF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SOLICITOR APPLICATION

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

DISTRICT COURT, BOULDER COUNTY, COLORADO Court Address: 1777 Sixth Street Boulder, CO 80903

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS

Plaintiffs, VADEN LAW FIRM, LLC; CITY PARK TITLE, LLC; and WAYNE E. VADEN,

BEFORE THE ADMINISTRATOR, UNIFORM CONSUMER CREDIT CODE IN THE MATTER OF CREDIT ANSWERS, LLC AND WILLIAM B. LOUGHBOROUGH,

Case 1:15-cv WSD Document 3 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT' COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. Case No. I: IS ~c.

CONSULTING AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ELECTRONIC INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT INTRODUCTION

* Each Will Comply With LR IA 10 2 Within 45 days Attorneys for Plaintiff, Goldman, Sachs & Co.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI`I ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 8

No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CASE NO. 1:12-CV-1179

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 320 Filed: 04/16/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2754 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Case 2:10-cv IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case4:12-cv KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

Case 0:15-cv WJZ Document 6-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

Case 3:11-cv RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA

Courtroom: 19 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Agent Agreement WITNESSETH

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Transcription:

DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff, v. GARY E. MAES, individually and d/b/a APPOINTED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES and ASSOCIATION FOR POLICE AND SHERIFFS, INC.; JOHN DOES 1-10, independent contractors or employees of Appointed Professional Services; and JANE DOES 1-10, independent contractors or employees of Appointed Professional Services. Defendants. Attorneys for Plaintiff: JOHN W. SUTHERS Attorney General ALISSA HECHT GARDENSWARTZ, 36126* alissa.gardenswartz@state.co.us JAY B. SIMONSON, 24077* First jay.simonson@state.co.us 1525 Sherman Street, 4 th Floor Denver, CO 80203 (303) 866-5079 (303) 866-4916 Fax *Counsel of Record t COURT USE ONLY t Case No.: 10CV2963 Div.: 19 STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT EFILED Document CO Denver County District Court 2nd JD Filing Date: Apr 15 2010 3:31PM MDT Filing ID: 30610405 Review Clerk: Patricia Garcia Plaintiff, the State of Colorado, upon relation of John W. Suthers, Attorney General for the State of Colorado, by and through undersigned counsel, and Defendant Gary E. Maes, d/b/a Appointed Professional Services and Association for Police and Sheriffs, Inc., having each consented to the entry of this Stipulated Final Judgment without trial or other adjudication of fact or law herein, and the Court, having considered this matter and being fully advised in the premises, FINDS, CONCLUDES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 1

JURISDICTION 1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and the parties hereto, and the Complaint states claims upon which relief can be granted under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act, Colo. Rev. Stat. 6-1-101 et seq. (2009) ( CCPA ) and the Colorado Charitable Solicitations Act, Colo. Rev. Stat. 6-16-101 et seq. (2009) ( CCSA ). Venue is proper in the City and County of Denver, State of Colorado. 2. This Court is authorized to issue a permanent injunction and other relief pursuant to Colo. Rev. Stat. 6-1-110(1), 6-1-112(1), and 6-1-113(4) (2009) of the CCPA and Colo. Rev. Stat. 6-16-111(5) of the CCSA. PERMANENT INJUNCTION 3. Defendant Maes is permanently enjoined from the following: a. Operating or conducting any activities on behalf of Association for Police and Sheriffs, Inc. and/or Appointed Professional Services, except that Maes may use the trade name Appointed Professional Services to conduct forprofit, non-charitable business operations; b. Operating, forming, founding, or establishing any charitable organization, as defined in Colo. Rev. Stat. 6-16-103(1); c. Acting as a director, officer, trustee, compensated employee, professional fundraising consultant, or paid solicitor of any charitable organization, as defined in Colo. Rev. Stat. 6-16-103(1); d. Making any charitable solicitations on behalf of any charity; and e. Using any trade names to make any charitable solicitations. 4. In order to comply with paragraph 3.a., Defendant Maes shall ensure that anyone acting on behalf of Association for Police and Sheriffs, Inc. and/or Appointed Professional Services immediately ceases all operations, including all solicitations and any distribution of funds in an account maintained for Association for Police and Sheriffs, Inc. and/or Appointed Professional Services, except as provided in paragraph 7. MONETARY RELIEF 5. Defendant Maes shall pay four thousand dollars ($4,000) as a civil penalty pursuant to Colo. Rev. Stat. 6-1-112(1) (2009). 2

6. Defendant Maes shall pay ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) to the Colorado Department of Law to establish a settlement fund for affected consumers. 7. Any funds that remain in any accounts maintained by Maes for Appointed Professional Services and/or Association for Police and Sheriffs, Inc. shall be disbursed to pay the penalties and restitution described in paragraphs 5 and 6 within ten (10) days of entry of this Stipulated Final Judgment by the Court. The payment shall be made payable to the Colorado Department of Law with a reference to Maes/APS and shall be delivered to: Alissa Hecht Gardenswartz Consumer Protection Section 1525 Sherman Street 7 th Floor Denver, Colorado 80203 8. After any funds remaining in any Appointed Professional Services and/or Association for Police and Sheriffs accounts are disbursed to the Colorado Department of Law pursuant to paragraph 7, payment of the remaining amount owed in civil penalties and restitution shall be suspended until such time that Defendant Maes violates any provision of this Stipulated Final Judgment. If Defendant Maes violates any provision of this Stipulated Final Judgment, he will pay the remaining civil penalties and restitution in full within ten (10) days of receiving notification of the violation(s). Payment shall be made in accordance with the instructions set forth in paragraph 7. CONSIDERATION 9. Defendant Maes is entering into this Stipulated Final Judgment for the purpose of compromising and resolving disputed claims and to avoid the expense of litigation. Defendant s execution of this Stipulated Final Judgment shall not be considered an admission by Defendant, and nothing herein shall be construed as an admission of liability by Defendant. Nothing herein constitutes approval by the State of Defendant s past or future practices, and Defendant shall not make any representation to the contrary. 10. Defendant agrees to cooperate fully with the Office of the Attorney General, including agreeing to accept service of process, in any proceedings related to the allegations described in the Complaint. 11. This Stipulated Final Judgment is intended to resolve finally and fully all of the civil disputes between the Attorney General and Defendant Maes arising out of the conduct alleged in the Complaint. This Stipulated Final Judgment shall not be construed to affect any claims by the Attorney General against any other Defendants, 3

named or unnamed, or against any other individuals or entities regarding the conduct alleged in the Complaint. This Stipulated Final Judgment shall not be construed to affect any criminal actions or charges against Defendant Maes, or against any other Defendants, named or unnamed, or against any other individuals or entities regarding the conduct alleged in the Complaint. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION 12. This Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purpose of enabling any party to this Stipulated Final Judgment to apply to the Court at any time for any further orders which may be necessary or appropriate for the construction, modification or execution of this Stipulated Final Judgment, and for the enforcement of compliance herewith and the punishment of violations hereof. 13. This Stipulated Final Judgment shall not be construed to affect the rights of any private party to pursue remedies pursuant to Colo. Rev. Stat. 6-1-113 (2009) of the CCPA, Colo. Rev. Stat. 6-16-111(5) (2009) of the CCSA, or under any other statutes through actions in common law. 14. The parties understand and agree that a violation of any provision of this Stipulated Final Judgment shall, in addition to resulting in the payment detailed in paragraph 9 above, give rise to the contempt remedies and penalties provided under Colo. Rev. Stat. 6-1-112(b) (2009). ACKNOWLEDGMENT 15. Defendant Maes acknowledges that he has thoroughly reviewed this Stipulated Final Judgment, that he has had an opportunity to consult with an attorney if he so chooses, that he understands and agrees to its terms, and that he agrees that it shall be entered as the Order of this Court. /s /s Alissa Hecht Gardenswartz, 36126* Gary E. Maes, d/b/a Appointed Professional Services Consumer Protection Section Consumer Fraud Unit 1525 Sherman Street, 5 th Floor PHONE: (303) 866-5079 FAX: (303) 866-4916 Date: April 12, 2010 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 4

*Counsel of Record Date: April 12, 2010 SO ORDERED THIS DAY OF, 2010. District Court Judge Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 121, 1-26(9), the original of this document with original signatures is maintained in the offices of the Colorado Attorney General, 1525 Sherman Street, Denver, CO 80203, and will be made available for inspection by other parties or the Court upon request. 5