Risk Adjustment in the Medicare ACO Shared Savings Program



Similar documents
Risk Adjustment Models for Medicare Part D Capitation Payments Modeling

Using encounter data for risk adjustment in Medicare Advantage. Andy Johnson and Dan Zabinski April 7, 2016

Improving risk adjustment in the Medicare program

Analysis of Care Coordination Outcomes /

Measure Information Form (MIF) #275, adapted for quality measurement in Medicare Accountable Care Organizations

Medicare Savings and Reductions in Rehospitalizations Associated with Home Health Use

Issue Brief. CMS Finalizes Rules for Medicare Shared Savings Program (ACOs) KEY POINTS COMMENT

The Value Quadrant of Healthcare Reform Pharos Innovations, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Methodology for Determining Shared Savings and Losses under the Medicare Shared Savings Program

ACO Type Initiatives

RISK SELECTION IN THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM. Running Title: Risk Selection in Health Insurance. Wei Yu, Ph.D.

Medicare- Medicaid Enrollee State Profile

Risk Adjustment 101: Health-Based Payment Adjustment Methodology

Medicare Advantage coding intensity and health risk assessments. Andy Johnson October 8, 2015

Selection of Medicaid Beneficiaries for Chronic Care Management Programs: Overview and Uses of Predictive Modeling

Medicare- Medicaid Enrollee State Profile

Evaluation of the CMS-HCC Risk Adjustment Model

Home Health Care Today: Higher Acuity Level of Patients Highly skilled Professionals Costeffective Uses of Technology Innovative Care Techniques

ACOs may elect Track 2 without completing a prior agreement period under a one-sided model

Accountable Care Fundamentals for Medical Practice Executives

Health Spring Meeting June Session # 27 TS: Medicare Advantage: Revenue Payments + Part D Accounting

Risk Adjustment: Implications for Community Health Centers

Greg Peterson, MPA, PhD candidate Melissa McCarthy, PhD Presentation for 2013 AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting

Medicare Managed Care Manual Chapter 7 Risk Adjustment

Medicare Design Part A: Inpatient care, hospice, and some home health care Part B: Physician services + outpatient care Part C ( Medicare Advantage

2014: Volume 4, Number 3. A publication of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of Information Products & Data Analytics

CMS National Dry Run: All-Cause Unplanned Readmission Measure for 30 Days Post Discharge from Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities

The Medicare Shared Savings Program and the Pioneer Accountable Care Organizations

Medicare Risk-Adjustment & Correct Coding 101. Rev. 10_31_14. Provider Training

HOW TO UNDERSTAND YOUR QUALITY AND RESOURCE USE REPORT

MA plans available to almost all Medicare beneficiaries

Chart Number of dialysis facilities is growing, and share of for-profit and freestanding dialysis providers is increasing

Risk Adjustment ABC s

CMS Innovation Center Improving Care for Complex Patients

Bellin-ThedaCare Healthcare Partners a Pioneer Accountable Care Organization. George Kerwin President/CEO Bellin Health

Medicare Final Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Regulations Effective January 1, 2012 Median Savings of $470 Million over 4 Years

Fact sheets: Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Investment Model Fact Sheet. Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Investment Model Fact Sheet

HDE FREE WEBINAR SERIES: BIDDING, RISK ADJUSTMENT, AND STARS. May 3, 2012

Risk Adjustment of Medicare Capitation Payments Using the CMS-HCC Model

Accountable Care Organization Final Rule Briefing. November 7, 2011


Geneva Association 10th Health and Aging Conference Insuring the Health of an Aging Population

National Medicare Readmission. Centers for Medicare and Medicare Services

Session 5 PD, Keys to Succeeding in the Medicare Advantage Market. Moderator/Presenter: Corey N. Berger, FSA, MAAA

Brief Research Report: Fountain House and Use of Healthcare Resources

NOTE TO: Medicare Advantage Organizations, Prescription Drug Plan Sponsors, and Other Interested Parties

Medicare Physician Group Practice Demonstration

Medicare- Medicaid Enrollee State Profile

Health Law Bulletin. provided by: ACOs AND SHARED SAVINGS IN A NUTSHELL Applications to Participate Available Now

Using Partial Capitation as an Alternative to Shared Savings to Support Accountable Care Organizations in Medicare

Medicare Shared Savings Program

Medicare Shared Savings Program Quality Measure Benchmarks for the 2015 Reporting Year

Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) Proposed Rule Summary March 31, 2011

Medicare- Medicaid Enrollee State Profile

Johns Hopkins HealthCare LLC: Care Management and Care Coordination for Chronic Diseases

Medicare Advantage Risk Adjustment Data Validation CMS-HCC Pilot Study. Report to Medicare Advantage Organizations

Physical and Mental Health Condition Prevalence and Comorbidity among Fee-for-Service Medicare- Medicaid Enrollees

Texas Association of Community Health Centers NOVEMBER 15, :00 AM WEBINAR

Medicare-Medicaid Coordination Office

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. Medicare Program; Request for Applications for the Medicare Care Choices Model

Presented by Kathleen S. Wyka, AAS, CRT, THE AFFORDABLE CA ACT AND ITS IMPACT ON THE RESPIRATORY C PROFESSION

What Would Strengthen Medicaid LTSS?

Medicare accountable care organization (ACO) update

ACOs: Impacting the Past, Present and Future State of Healthcare

PL and Amendments: Impact on Post-Acute Care for Health Care Systems

Dual Eligibles and State Innovations in Care Management

INTRODUCTION. 7 DISCUSSION AND ONGOING RESEARCH.. 29 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ENDNOTES.. 31

Gold Coast Health IT Resource Center. Accountable Care Organization (ACO)

Risk Adjustment/HCC Coding and Documentation

Quick Turnaround with Administrative Health Data

The Medicare Shared Savings Program

Accountable Care Organizations: What Providers Need to Know

Medicare Advantage payment areas and risk adjustment

A predictive analytics platform powered by non-medical staff reduces cost of care among high-utilizing Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries

Kaiser Permanente Guide to Medicare Basics

2015 Medicare Advantage rates: Perspectives for payors

The Critical Importance of Targeting (or It s the targeting, stupid. )

Medicare- Medicaid Enrollee State Profile

Medicare Shared Savings ( ACO ) Proposed Rule: Attribution and Payment Provisions. AAMC Teleconference May12, 2011

Medicare Shared Savings Program Quality Measure Benchmarks for the 2014 Reporting Year

Medicare Risk Adjustment Models: DxCG vs. CMS-HCC. Corresponding author: Jing Chen, Ph.D, MBA, Verisk Health, Inc.

January 3, RE: Comments submitted at

Special Needs Plan Model of Care 101

Navigating CMS Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals Why It Matters and What You Need to Know. Dr. Paul Mulhausen, CMO

CMS Proposals for Quality Reporting Programs under the 2015 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule. July 24, 2014

Private Fee-For-Service -----Provider Questions and Answers

The Organization and Performance of Accountable Care Organizations: Early Evidence Thomas D Aunno, Ph.D. Columbia University

HCCs and Star-Ratings: An IPA s Successful Approach to Revenue Integrity. Nancy Hirschl, CCS Victoria McKemy, MHA James Taylor, MD, CPC

DETAILED SUMMARY--MEDCIARE SHARED SAVINGS/ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATION (ACO) PROGRAM

MEDICARE. Results from the First Two Years of the Pioneer Accountable Care Organization Model

Proposed changes to 2014 Medicare Advantage payment methodology and the effect on Medicare Advantage organizations and beneficiaries

GAO MEDICARE ADVANTAGE. Relationship between Benefit Package Designs and Plans Average Beneficiary Health Status. Report to Congressional Requesters

DRAFT. Background About Shared Savings Program Design Features: Patient Attribution, Cost Target Calculation, and Payment Calculation and Distribution

Medicare Advantage special needs plans

caresy caresync Chronic Care Management

Anatomy of an ACO. Through the Eyes of a Physician-owned IPA. Genesis Accountable Care Organization

Impact of VA Home Based Primary Care: Access, Quality and Cost National Health Policy Forum

EARLY INDICATIONS OF CHANGES TO 2014 MAO PAYMENT METHODOLOGY

New York Presbyterian Innovations in Health Care Reform at Academic Medical Centers

Site-neutral payments for select conditions treated in inpatient rehabilitation facilities and skilled nursing facilities

Transcription:

Risk Adjustment in the Medicare ACO Shared Savings Program Presented by: John Kautter Presented at: AcademyHealth Conference Baltimore, MD June 23-25, 2013 RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. www.rti.org

Introduction Role of risk adjustment in the ACO Shared Savings Program CMS-HCC risk scores Risk Adjustment in Historical Benchmark Period Risk Adjustment in Performance Years 2

Risk Adjustment: Overview Risk adjustment is a method for adjusting expenditures to account for differences in expected health costs of individuals Adjustment can take into account demographic information (age, sex, eligibility) and health status (diagnoses) Why adjust? To account for changes in severity and case mix over time and to more accurately set ACO performance targets. Recognize ACOs that care for complex patients, and not create incentives for ACOs to avoid these populations. 3

CMS-HCC Risk Scores CMS-HCC (Hierarchical Condition Categories) risk scores The CMS-HCC model uses beneficiary demographic characteristics and prior year diagnoses to predict relative Part A and Part B Medicare fee-for-service program payments The CMS-HCC model does not incorporate Medicare Part D costs The CMS-HCC model is prospective, meaning it uses prior year information to predict costs Same risk adjustment model used for Medicare Advantage Separate CMS-HCC models for Aged-disabled community and institutional ESRD New Medicare enrollees (demographic score) 4

Demographic Factors Used in CMS-HCC Risk Scores 24 age-sex cells E.g., male age 80-84 Medicaid dual eligible status By sex and aged vs. disabled entitlement Disabled status Current disabled: Separate age/sex and Medicaid factors Selected diagnoses have different risk weights Currently aged, originally entitled to Medicare by disability Separate factor by sex 5

Diagnoses Used in CMS-HCC Risk Scores The diagnoses used to calculate risk scores for fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries are from FFS claims Use International Classification of Disease, Version 9, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes (ICD9-CM) Diagnoses from the following settings/providers are used Hospital inpatient Hospital outpatient Physician Clinically-trained non-physician (e.g., clinical psychologist) The CMS-HCC model counts only the most severe manifestation among related conditions 6

Hypothetical Illustrative Example of Beneficiary s Individual Risk Score Calculation Beneficiary is male, age 77, with the chronic conditions: congestive heart failure, diabetes with complications, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Risk adjustment model coefficients Male age 77 = $5,100 CHF = $3,900 Diabetes w/ comp = $3,300 COPD = $3,700 Beneficiary s predicted expenditures are $16,000 Average expenditures for all beneficiaries are $10,000 Beneficiary s risk score = $16,000 / $10,000 = 1.6 7

Risk Adjustment in Historical Benchmark Period The CMS-HCC prospective risk adjustment models will be used to calculate the ACO s assigned beneficiary population s risk scores for the benchmark years, which are used in calculating the historical benchmark. Changes in the ACO s risk score between benchmark years 1 and 3 will be used to trend forward benchmark year 1 expenditures. Similarly, changes in the ACO s risk score between benchmark years 2 and 3 will be used to trend forward benchmark year 2 expenditures. 8

Risk Adjustment in Historical Benchmark Period (cont d) BY1 expenditures will be adjusted by the BY1 to BY3 risk ratio (BY3 risk score BY1 risk score). Similarly, BY2 expenditures will be adjusted by the BY2 to BY3 risk ratio (BY3 risk score BY2 risk score). BY1 BY2 BY3 [C] Assigned Beneficiary HCC Risk Scores ESRD 1.148 1.152 1.178 Disabled 1.002 1.004 1.007 Aged/dual 1.282 1.386 1.463 Aged/non dual 1.039 1.042 1.062 [D] Risk Ratios to BY3 ESRD 1.026 1.022 1.000 Disabled 1.005 1.002 1.000 Aged/dual 1.141 1.055 1.000 Aged/non dual 1.022 1.019 1.000 Risk ratios used to trend historical benchmark expenditures to benchmark year three risk 9

Risk Adjustment in Performance Years The benchmark will be annually adjusted for changes in health status and demographic factors during the performance year. Newly assigned beneficiaries vs. continuously assigned beneficiaries 1) Newly assigned beneficiaries in a given year = Beneficiaries assigned to the ACO in that year but not assigned to the ACO in the prior year and not receiving primary care services from the ACO in the prior year. 2) Continuously assigned beneficiaries in a given year = Beneficiaries assigned to the ACO in that year and assigned to the ACO in the prior year or receiving primary care services from the ACO in the prior year. 10

How to Determine Final Risk Scores to Use in Adjusting Benchmark For newly assigned beneficiaries, an ACO's CMS-HCC prospective risk scores will be annually updated in each performance year to adjust the historical benchmark for changes in severity and case mix relative to the newly assigned population from the historical benchmark period (BY3). For continuously assigned beneficiaries, patient demographic factors will be used to adjust the benchmark to account for changes between the benchmark period and the performance year, unless the continuously assigned population shows a decline in its CMS- HCC risk scores, in which case health status changes for this population will be adjusted by their CMS-HCC risk scores. 11

Example 1 CMS-HCC Risk Score Used for Continuously Assigned Beneficiaries Determine Final Risk Ratio [R5] Step 1 Calculate Risk Ratios Demographic Ratio: HCC Ratio: Weights ESRD 1.017 1.006 6% Disabled 1.000 1.015 10% Aged/dual 1.015 1.011 14% Aged/non dual 1.000 0.990 69% Average (dollar weighted) Dollar weighted average 0.997 risk ratios Historical Benchmark $ x Continously Assigned Person Years [R6] Step 2 Final Adjusted Risk Scores HCC Score: Risk Score to use: Avg Adjusted Score: ESRD 1.090 1.200 1.174 Disabled 1.050 1.040 1.044 Aged/dual 1.300 1.540 1.490 Aged/non dual 0.830 1.080 1.058 Because dollar weighted average HCC risk ratio is less than one, use HCC risk [R7] Step 3 Final Risk Ratios Risk Ratio: ESRD ratio for continuously assigned 0.997 Disabled 1.037 Aged/dual 1.018 Aged/non dual 0.996 Weighted average of PY1 HCC score for newly assigned plus appropriate risk score for continously assigned PY1 average adjusted score / BY3 average HCC score These risk ratios are multiplied by the historical benchmark dollars and added to the National growth increment to produce the ACO s updated benchmark expenditures 12

Example 2 Demographic Factors Used for Continuously Assigned Beneficiaries Determine Adjusted Benchmark Continously Assigned [R5] Step 1 Compare Risk Ratios Demographic Ratio: HCC Ratio: Weights ESRD 1.017 1.065 6% Disabled 1.000 1.021 10% Aged/dual Dollar weighted 1.015 1.031 14% Aged/non dual average risk ratios 1.000 0.996 69% Average (dollar weighted) 1.008 Historical Benchmark $ x Continously Assigned Person Years Newly Assigned [R6] Step 2 Final Adjusted Risk Scores PY1 HCC Score: Risk Score to use: Avg Adjusted Score: ESRD 1.090 1.212 1.183 Disabled 1.050 1.025 1.035 Aged/dual 1.300 1.546 1.494 Aged/non dual 0.830 1.090 1.067 Because dollar weighted average [R7] Step 3 Benchmark Adjustment Risk Ratio: HCC risk ratio is greater than one, ESRD use demographic ratio for 1.005 Disabled continuously assigned 1.028 Aged/dual 1.022 Aged/non dual 1.005 Weighted average of PY1 HCC score for newly assigned appropriate risk score for continously assigned PY1 average adjusted score / BY3 average HCC score These risk ratios are multiplied by the historical benchmark dollars and added to the National growth increment to produce the ACO s updated benchmark expenditures 13

Incorporated Risk Scores in Adjusted Benchmark Risk ratios are multiplied by the historical benchmark dollars and added to the National growth increment to produce the ACO s updated benchmark expenditures 14

Wrap-up Risk Adjustment for the Medicare Shared Saving Program Risk adjustment helps to more accurately establish an ACO s performance target, that is used to measure the ACO s financial performance. Risk adjustment methodology reflects changes in health status of an ACO s assigned beneficiary population over time, both in establishing the historical benchmark and during the performance year. Risk adjustment is performed at the population level, taking into account enrollment status, HCC and demographic factors. 15