IN VITRO BINDING BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDY SUMMARY TABLES AND SAS TRANSPORT FORMATTED TABLES FOR DATASET SUBMISSION

Similar documents
Draft agreed by Pharmacokinetics Working Party January Adoption by CHMP for release for consultation 17 February 2011

Step-by-Step Analytical Methods Validation and Protocol in the Quality System Compliance Industry

ANALYTICAL METHODS INTERNATIONAL QUALITY SYSTEMS

ANDA CHECKLIST FOR CTD or ectd FORMAT FOR COMPLETENESS and ACCEPTABILITY of an APPLICATION FOR FILING

Reversed Phase High Presssure Liquid Chromatograhphic Technique for Determination of Sodium Alginate from Oral Suspension

Applying Statistics Recommended by Regulatory Documents

Guidance for Industry

Draft Agreed by Pharmacokinetics Working Party January End of consultation (deadline for comments) 31 May 2011

Tamsulosin Hydrochloride Capsules

ICH Topic Q 1 A Stability Testing Guidelines: Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products

Guidance for Industry

Calculating Drug Dosages

VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES: TEXT AND METHODOLOGY Q2(R1)

SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF TELMISARTAN AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE IN TABLET DOSAGE FORM USING REVERSE PHASE HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY

Implementing New USP Chapters for Analytical Method Validation

Performance Evaluation of Actimask 92S Ibuprofen: A Novel Taste-Masked Ibuprofen for Use in Orally-Dispersible Dosage Forms

STABILITY TESTING OF NEW DRUG SUBSTANCES AND PRODUCTS

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND BIO-SCIENCE

Working with ICH Quality Guidelines - the Canadian Perspective

2.3 QUALITY OVERALL SUMMARY Sakura Tablet

Generic drugs are copies of innovator drug products

Design of Experiments for Analytical Method Development and Validation

Mouse Insulin ELISA. For the quantitative determination of insulin in mouse serum and plasma

Table 1. Pure superdisintegrant tablet formulation. Material % w/w Weight (mg) Superdisintegrant Stearic acid 1 2.

Guidance for Industry Q1A(R2) Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products

Assay Qualification Template for Host Cell Protein ELISA

COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP)

Development of validated RP- HPLC method for estimation of rivaroxaban in pharmaceutical formulation

Analytical Test Method Validation Report Template

ICH Topic Q 1 A (R2) Stability Testing of new Drug Substances and Products. Step 5

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research

Guidance for Industry

Uniformity of Dosage Units (BP 2011 & USP 34) Ms. Witinee Kongsuk Bureau of Drug and Narcotic Department of Medical Sciences June 14, 2011

High sensitivity assays using online SPE-LC-MS/MS -How low can you go? Mohammed Abrar Unilabs York Bioanalytical solutions, York, UK

All the prepared formulations were subjected for following. evaluation parameters and obtained results were showed in Tables 6.3 &

Qualification Study CHO 360-HCP ELISA (Type A to D)

Content Uniformity (CU) testing for the 21 st Century: CDER Perspective

Thermo Scientific SOLAµ SPE Plates Technical Guide. Consistent excellence. for bioanalysis

High Performance Thin Layer Chromatographic Method for Estimation of Cefprozil in Tablet Dosage Form

Change to read: 1160 PHARMACEUTICAL CALCULATIONS IN PRESCRIPTION COMPOUNDING PHARMACY PRACTICE 1S (USP38)

Develop a Quantitative Analytical Method for low (» 1 ppm) levels of Sulfate

GDUFA Regulatory Science Update

Compilation of individual product-specific guidance on demonstration of bioequivalence

510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY

Quality by Design for ANDAs: An Example for Modified Release Dosage Forms

Guidance for Industry

Extraction of Cannabinoids in Marijuana and Edibles by QuEChERS

Directly compressed mini-tablets coated in a solid-wall pan for sustained drug release

CypExpress 3A4 Catalyzed Conversion of Testosterone (TE) to 6β- Hydroxytestosterone (HT)

Enzymes: Amylase Activity in Starch-degrading Soil Isolates

Removal of Sulfate from Waste Water by Activated Carbon. Mohammed Sadeq Salman Computer Centre/ University of Baghdad

STABILITY TESTING OF ACTIVE SUBSTANCES AND PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS

ASSURING THE QUALITY OF TEST RESULTS

Biopharmaceutical Process Evaluated for Viral Clearance

For Educational Use Only - Not for Detailing or Distribution

Guidance for Industry

ICH Q1A(R2) Guideline. Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products

RayBio Creatine Kinase (CK) Activity Colorimetric Assay Kit

PROCEDURES FOR HANDLING OOS RESULTS

International GMP Requirements for Quality Control Laboratories and Recomendations for Implementation

HPLC Analysis of Acetaminophen Tablets with Waters Alliance and Agilent Supplies

Affi-Prep Protein A Matrix Instruction Manual

Guidance for Industry ANDAs: Stability Testing of Drug Substances and Products

BRIEFING 7 LABELING DEFINITION

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT GUIDE

Simultaneous determination of L-ascorbic acid and D-iso-ascorbic acid (erythorbic acid) in wine by HPLC and UV-detection (Resolution Oeno 11/2008)

Inc. Wuhan. Quantity Pre-coated, ready to use 96-well strip plate 1 Plate sealer for 96 wells 4 Standard (liquid) 2

Canine creatine kinase MB isoenzyme (CK-MB)ELISA Kit

竞 争 性 分 析 Epitope Mapping 实 验 方 法

IMPURITIES IN NEW DRUG PRODUCTS

Bioequivalence Testing, using the Dissolution Profile

ab Protein Sumoylation Assay Ultra Kit

Pharmaceutical Quality Systems: US Perspective

QbD Understanding How Excipient Properties Influence Solid Oral Dosage Form Performance

Guidance for Industry

Analysis of Various Vitamins in Multivitamin Tablets

Annex 2 Stability testing of active pharmaceutical ingredients and finished pharmaceutical products

Research Article Prospective Validation of Paracetamol Tablet Dosage Form

Creatine Kinase Activity Colorimetric Assay Kit ABE assays; Store at -20 C

INSULIN PRODUCTS. Jack DeRuiter

Revisions to USP 32 NF 27, First Supplement

Letter Date March 27, 2007 Stamp Date March 28, 2007 PDUFA Goal Date January 28, 2008

International Journal of Research and Reviews in Pharmacy and Applied science.

2. Contact Person: Garo Mimaryan, MS., RAC 7 Technical Regulatory Affairs Specialist III 3. Phone Number: (914)

It is an important tool to assess factors that affect the bioavailability of a drug from a solid preparartion.

Western Blot Analysis with Cell Samples Grown in Channel-µ-Slides

ph and Acidity in Tomato Sauce

Validating Methods using Waters Empower TM 2 Method. Validation. Manager

A Stability Program for the Distribution of Drug Products

Scientific Challenges for Development of Biosimilar Monoclonal Antibodies. Rafiqul Islam Director, Global Bioanalytical Services Celerion

GUIDELINES FOR THE VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR ACTIVE CONSTITUENT, AGRICULTURAL AND VETERINARY CHEMICAL PRODUCTS.

USP Certificate PREDNISONE TABLETS. USP Catalog No.: USP Lot No.: R031Y0 (10 mg nominal prednisone content per tablet)

Comparative Assessment of the Quality Control Measurements of Multisource Ofloxacin Tablets Marketed in Nigeria

Epinephrine/Norepinephrine ELISA Kit

Elemental Scientific. Stability. Elemental Scientific

Guideline for Industry

Environmental Water Testing: Surface Water, Groundwater, Hard Water, Wastewater, & Seawater

TECHNICAL BULLETIN. HIS-Select Nickel Affinity Gel. Catalog Number P6611 Storage Temperature 2 8 C

BRIEFING Plastic Packaging Systems for Pharmaceutical Use.

Transcription:

IN VITRO BINDING BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDY SUMMARY TABLES AND SAS TRANSPORT FORMATTED TABLES FOR DATASET SUBMISSION I. For Calcium Acetate Drug Products Table I.1 Submission Summary * Drug Product Name Strength(s) Applicant Name Address Point of Contact Name Address Telephone Number Fax Number Or, please provide an electronic copy of Form 356H. * This information is needed for a complete Bioequivalence review and, although required for the archival copy submitted to the Agency, it is frequently not readily available in the Bioequivalence Submission. The Division of Bioequivalence prefers that this information be submitted as a electronic Form 356H. If this is not possible, then please complete Table 1.

Table I.2. Summary of In Vitro Binding Study Calcium Acetate Capsules/Tablets/Oral Solution Dose: Maximum Phosphate Binding Capacity (at saturated phosphate concentration (xxx mmole)) Arithmetic Data Parameter In-Vitro Phosphate Binding Study (Study No. ) Phosphate Test (n= ) Mean Reference (n= ) Point Estimate Ratio 90%CI Maximum Binding (mmole) %CV - -

Table I.3. Pre-Study Analytical Method Validation Information Requested Calcium Phosphate Analytical method validation report location Analyte Internal standard (IS) Method description Limit of quantitation (mm) Average recovery (%) Linearity Intermediate precision range (%) Standard curve concentrations (mm) QC concentrations (mm) Storage Stability (days) Stock Stability (days) Bench-Top Stability (days) Filter Evaluation Dilution integrity Selectivity All SOPs for analytical method validation and in vitro binding test method should be submitted.

Table I.4. Summary of In Vitro Dissolution Studies, if applicable Dissolution Conditions Apparatus: Speed of Rotation: Medium: Volume: Temperature: Firm s Proposed Specifications Dissolution Testing Site (Name, Address) Study Testing Product ID \ Batch No. Dosage No. of Collection Times (minutes or hours) Study Ref No. Date (Test - Manufacture Date) Strength Dosage Report (Reference Expiration Date) & Form Units Location Study Report #: Study Report #: Test Product Reference Product mg Tablet Capsule mg Tablet Capsule 12 Mean Range % CV 12 Mean Range % CV

Table I.5. Formulation Data Ingredient Function Amount (mg) / Unit* Amount (% w/w) / Unit* Strength 1 Strength 1 Total 100.00 For tablet or capsule. If it is solution, please provide Amount (mg)/5 ml and Amount (% w/w) or Amount (% w/v). Please include the formulations of all strengths.

Table I.6. Reanalysis of Study Samples Reason why assay was repeated In-Vitro Binding Study, Study No. Additional information in Volume(s), Page(s) Number of samples Number of recalculated values used in reanalyzed reanalysis Actual % of total number assays Actual number % of total assays T R T R T R T R Total Please provide a separate table for each analyte.

Table I.7. Study Information Study Number Study Title Analytical Site (Name, Address, Phone #) Analysis Dates Analytical Director Storage Period of Study Samples (no. of days from the first day of sample collection to the last day of sample analysis) Please provide a separate table for each In Vitro Binding Bioequivalence Study

Table I.8. Product Information Product Test Reference Treatment ID Product Name Manufacturer Batch/Lot No. Manufacture Date Expiration Date Strength Dosage Form Batch Size Production Batch Size Potency Assay

Table I.9. Assay Validation 1. Phosphate Phosphate Parameter Standard Curve Samples Concentration (mm) Inter day Precision (%CV) Inter day Accuracy (%Actual) Linearity (Range of R2 values) Linearity Range (mm) Sensitivity/LOQ (mm) Parameter Concentration (mm) Inter day Precision (%CV) Inter day Accuracy (%Actual) 2. Calcium Parameter Concentration (mm) Inter day Precision (%CV) Inter day Accuracy (%Actual) Linearity Linearity Range (mm) Sensitivity/LOQ (mm) Quality Control Samples Calcium Standard Curve Samples (Range of R2 values) Parameter Concentration (mm) Inter day Precision (%CV) Inter day Accuracy (%Actual) Quality Control Samples

Table I.10. SOP s Dealing with Analytical Repeats SOP No. Effective Date of SOP SOP Title Please include the complete SOP for Analytical Repeats in your submission.

Table I.11. Calcium Amount in the Supernatant after Binding Phosphate Mean (mmol) Mean Ratio Spiking Level (mmoles) Test Reference Point Estimate 90%CI* * For informational purposes only Similarity Factor F 2 (Calculated using calcium mean concentrations): Table I.12. Phosphate Amount in the Supernatant after Binding Phosphate Mean (mmol) (n=12) Mean Ratio Spiking Level (mmol) Test Reference Point Estimate 90%CI* * For informational purposes only Similarity Factor F 2 (Calculated using phosphate mean concentrations):

II. For a polymer drug that binds to either phosphate (e.g. Sevelamer) or bile acid (e.g., Colesevelam, Cholestyramine or Colestipol) Table II.1 Submission Summary Drug Product Name Strength(s) Applicant Name Address Point of Contact Name Address Telephone Number Fax Number Or, please provide an electronic copy of Form 356H. This information is needed for a complete Bioequivalence review and, although required for the archival copy submitted to the Agency, it is frequently not readily available in the Bioequivalence Submission. The Division of Bioequivalence prefers that this information be submitted as a electronic Form 356H. If this is not possible, then please complete Table 1.

Summaries of In Vitro Binding Studies II.2. In-Vitro Equilibrium Binding Studies Table II.2.1. Summary of k 1 and k 2 - Without Acid Pre-Treatment (if applicable) Condition 1 (e.g., ph 4) Test Reference 90% CI Parameter Mean STD Mean STD Ratio T/R Lower Upper k1 k2 Condition 2, etc (e.g., ph 7) Test Reference 90% CI Parameter Mean STD Mean STD Ratio T/R Lower Upper k1 k2 Note: Please specify testing conditions in the table as appropriate.

Table II.2.2. Summary of k 1 and k 2 - With Acid Pre-Treatment (if applicable) Condition 1 (e.g., ph 4) Test Reference 90% CI Parameter Mean STD Mean STD Ratio T/R Lower Upper k1 k2 Condition 2, etc (e.g., ph 7) Test Reference 90% CI Parameter Mean STD Mean STD Ratio T/R Lower Upper k1 k2 Note: Please specify the testing conditions in the table as appropriate.

Table II.3. Pre-Study Analytical Method Validation Information Requested Analytical method validation report location Analyte Internal standard (IS) Method description Limit of quantitation (mm) Average recovery of phosphate (%) Linearity Intermediate precision range (%) Standard curve concentrations (mm) QC concentrations (mm) Storage Stability (days) Stock Stability (days) Bench-Top Stability (days) Filter Evaluation Dilution integrity Selectivity All SOPs for analytical method validation and in vitro binding test method should be submitted.

Table II.4. Summary of In Vitro Disintegration Studies Disintegration Conditions Apparatus: Speed of Rotation: Medium: Volume: Temperature: Firm s Proposed Specifications Disintegration Testing Site (Name, Address) Study Testing Product ID \ Batch No. Dosage No. of Study Ref No. Date Disintegration Time (Test - Manufacture Date) Strength Dosage Report Location (minutes) (Reference Expiration Date) & Form Units Study Report #: Study Report #: Test Product Reference Product mg Tablet Capsule mg Tablet Capsule Provide disintegration data for all strengths of the test and reference products. 12 Mean Range % CV 12 Mean Range % CV

Table II.5. Formulation Data Ingredient Function Amount (mg) / Unit* Amount (%) / Unit* Strength 1 Strength 1 Total 100.00 For tablet or capsule. If it is powder for suspension, please provide amount (mg)/packet and amount (% w/w). Please include the formulations of all strengths

Table II.6. Reanalysis of Study Samples Reason why assay was repeated In-Vitro Binding Study, Study No. Additional information in Volume(s), Page(s) Number of samples Number of recalculated values used in reanalyzed reanalysis Actual % of total number assays Actual number % of total assays T R T R T R T R Total

Table II.7. Study Information Study Number Study Title Analytical Site (Name, Address, Phone #) Analysis Dates Analytical Director Storage Period of Study Samples (no. of days from the first day of sample collection to the last day of sample analysis) Please provide a separate table for each In Vitro Binding Bioequivalence Study

Table II.8. Product Information Product Test Reference Treatment ID Product Name Manufacturer Batch/Lot No. Manufacture Date Expiration Date Strength Dosage Form Batch Size Production Batch Size Binding Capacity Assay and Date of Assay Please provide a separate table for each In Vitro Binding Bioequivalence Study

Table II.9.1. Study Design In Vitro Kinetic Binding Study Phosphate/Bile Acid Concentration(s) Phosphate/Bile Acid Solution Preparation Drug Amount Final Reaction Volume Temperature ( o C) ph(s) used Binding (incubation) Time(s) Parameter Determined No. of Samples (Replicates) Sample Preparation Buffer Component(s) and Concentration(s) Table II.9.2. Study Design In Vitro Equilibrium Binding Study Phosphate/Bile Acid Concentration(s) Phosphate/Bile Acid Solution Preparation Drug Amount Total Volume Temperature ( o C) ph(s) used Incubation Time(s) Parameter(s) measured (Units of parameters) No. of Samples (Replicates) Sample Preparation Calculation of Langmuir Binding Constants (Linear or Non-linear) Buffer Component(s) and Concentration(s)

Table II.10. Assay Validation Parameter Concentration (mm) Inter day Precision (%CV) Inter day Accuracy (%Actual) Linearity Linearity Range (mm) Sensitivity/LOQ (mm) (Range of R2 values) Analyte Standard Curve Samples Parameter Quality Control Samples Concentration (mm) Inter day Precision (%CV) Inter day Accuracy (%Actual) Please provide a separate table for each analyte Please provide a separate table for each In Vitro Binding Bioequivalence Study Table II.11. SOP s Dealing with Analytical Repeats SOP No. Effective Date of SOP SOP Title Please include the complete SOP for Analytical Repeats in your submission.

In-Vitro Kinetic Binding Study Results Table II.12.1. T/R Ratios of Mean Phosphate/Bile Acid Binding Incubation Duration Mean and %CV of the Test/Reference Ratios (Drug Bound) (n=) T/R Ratio T/R ratio Condition 2 Condition 3 T/R Ratio Condition 1 T/R Ratio Condition 4, etc Time 1 Time 2 Time 3 Time 4 Time 5 Time 6 Time 7 Time 8 Example of conditions: For Sevelamer: ph 4 and 7; For Colesevelam, Cholestyramine and Colestipol: SIF at ph 6.8. Please specify the times and testing conditions in the table as appropriate. Table II.12.2. With Acid Pre-Treatment (if applicable) Mean and %CV of the Test/Reference Ratios (Drug Bound) (n=) Incubation Duration T/R Ratio Condition 1 T/R Ratio Condition 2 T/R ratio Condition 3 T/R Ratio Condition 4, etc Time 1 Time 2 Time 3 Time 4 Time 5 Time 6 Time 7 Time 8 Example of conditions: For Sevelamer: ph 4 and 7; For Colesevelam, Cholestyramine and Colestipol: SIF at ph 6.8. Please specify the times and testing conditions in the table as appropriate.

In-Vitro Equilibrium Binding Study Results Table II.13.1. Summary of Mean Binding Data Without Acid-Pretreatment Test (n=) Mean Bound Adsorbate Total Amount of (micromole/gm Adsorbate at Start (mm) Adsorbent) %CV Condition 1 (e.g., ph 4) Reference (n=) Mean Bound Adsorbate (micromole/gm Adsorbent) %CV Condition 2 (e.g., ph 7) Example of conditions: For Sevelamer: ph 4 and 7; For Colesevelam, Cholestyramine and Colestipol: SIF at ph 6.8. Please specify the testing conditions in the table as appropriate.

Table II.13.1. Summary of Mean Binding Data With Acid Pre-Treatment (if applicable) Test (n=) Total Amount of Adsorbate at Start (mm) Mean Bound Adsorbate (micromole/gm Adsorbent) %CV Condition 1 (e.g., ph 4) Reference (n=) Mean Bound Adsorbate (micromole/gm Adsorbent) %CV Condition 2 (e.g., ph 7) Example of conditions: For Sevelamer: ph 4 and 7; For Colesevelam, Cholestyramine and Colestipol: SIF at ph 6.8. Please specify the testing conditions in the table as appropriate.

III. For Lanthanum Drug Products Table III.1. Submission Summary Drug Product Name Strength(s) Applicant Name Address Point of Contact Name Address Telephone Number Fax Number Or, please provide an electronic copy of Form 356H. This information is needed for a complete Bioequivalence review and, although required for the archival copy submitted to the Agency, it is frequently not readily available in the Bioequivalence Submission. The Division of Bioequivalence prefers that this information be submitted as a electronic Form 356H. If this is not possible, then please complete Table 1.

Summaries of In Vitro Binding Studies III.2. Summary of Mean Binding Data ph 1.2 Condition 1 Test Reference 90% CI Parameter Mean %CV Mean %CV Ratio T/R Lower Upper k1 k2 ph 3 Condition 2 Test Reference 90% CI Parameter Mean STD Mean STD Ratio T/R Lower Upper k1 k2 ph 5 Condition 3, Test Reference 90% CI Parameter Mean STD Mean STD Ratio T/R Lower Upper k1 k2 Note: Please specify the testing conditions in each table as appropriate.

In Vitro Dissolution Bioequivalence Studies III.3. Summary of Dissolution Bioequivalence Data Location Medium Volume (ml) USP Apparatus type Rotation (rpm) Specifications Medium In vitro study Strength 0.1 N HCl 1000 mg ph 3.0 Buffer ph 5.0 Buffer 1000 mg 1000 mg Other Strength 500 mg 750 mg F2 metric for Test F2 metric for Test Vs RLD F2 metric for RLD 1000 mg -- -- 500 mg 750 mg 1000 mg -- -- 500 mg 750 mg 1000 mg -- --

Table III.4. Pre-Study Analytical Method Validation (for In Vitro Binding Study Sample Analysis) Information Requested Analytical method validation report location Analyte Internal standard (IS) Method description Limit of quantitation (mm) Average recovery of phosphate (%) Linearity Intermediate precision range (%) Standard curve concentrations (mm) QC concentrations (mm) Storage Stability (days) Stock Stability (days) Bench-Top Stability (days) Filter Evaluation Dilution integrity Selectivity All SOPs for analytical method validation and in vitro binding test method should be submitted. Table III.5. Pre-Study Analytical Method Validation (for In Vitro Dissolution Bioequivalence Study Sample Analysis) Information Requested Analytical method validation report location Study Report Number Analyte Method description Specificity System Precision Method precision Ruggedness (% difference in dissolution)(state equipment/analysts changed). Intermediate Precision Analyte:

Robustness Filter Study Accuracy (Concentration Levels, percent Recovery, % RSD) Linearity (concentration range, r value) Stability in analytical solution System Suitability Acceptance Criteria; Criteria met? (Yes or No) Dilution All SOPs for analytical method validation and in vitro dissolution method should be submitted.

Table III.6. Summary of In Vitro Dissolution Studies (for Both In Vitro Dissolution Bioequivalence Studies and Regulatory Dissolution Studies) Dissolution Conditions Apparatus: Speed of Rotation: Medium: Volume: Temperature: Firm s Proposed Specifications Dissolution Testing Site (Name, Address) Study Testing Product ID \ Batch No. Dosage No. of Collection Times (minutes or hours) Study Ref No. Date (Test - Manufacture Date) Strength Dosage Report (Reference Expiration Date) & Form Units Location Study Report #: Study Report #: Test Product Reference Product Provide dissolution data for all strengths (test and reference). mg Tablet Capsule mg Tablet Capsule 12 Mean Range % CV 12 Mean Range % CV

Table III.7. Formulation Data Ingredient Function Amount (mg) / Tablet Amount (% w/w) / Tablet Strength 1 Strength 1 Please include the formulations of all strengths. Total 100.00

Table III.8. Reanalysis of Study Samples Reason why assay was repeated In-Vitro Binding Study, Study No. Additional information in Volume(s), Page(s) Number of samples Number of recalculated values used in reanalyzed reanalysis Actual % of total number assays Actual number % of total assays T R T R T R T R Total

Table III.9. Study Information Study Number Study Title Analytical Site (Name, Address, Phone #) Analysis Dates Analytical Director Storage Period of Study Samples (no. of days from the first day of sample collection to the last day of sample analysis) Please provide a separate table for each In Vitro Binding Bioequivalence Study

Table III.10. Product Information Product Test Reference Treatment ID Product Name Manufacturer Batch/Lot No. Manufacture Date Expiration Date Strength Dosage Form Batch Size Production Batch Size Potency Assay Uniformity of Dosage Unit Please provide a separate table for each In Vitro Binding Bioequivalence Study

Table III.11.1. Study Design In Vitro Kinetic Binding Study Phosphate Phosphate Preparation Drug Amount Final Reaction Volume Temperature ( o C) ph(s) used Binding (incubation) Time(s) Parameter Determined No. of Samples (Replicates) Sample Preparation Buffer Component(s) and Concentration(s) Table III.11.2. Study Design In Vitro Equilibrium Binding Study Phosphate Phosphate Preparation Drug Amount Total Volume Temperature ( o C) ph(s) used Incubation Time(s) Parameter(s) measured (Units of parameters) No. of Samples (Replicates) Sample Preparation Calculation of Langmuir Binding Constants (Linear or Non-linear) Buffer Component(s) and Concentration(s)

Table III.12. Assay Validation Parameter Concentration (mm) Inter day Precision (%CV) Inter day Accuracy (%Actual) Linearity Linearity Range (mm) Sensitivity/LOQ (mm) (Range of R2 values) Phosphate Standard Curve Samples Parameter Quality Control Samples Concentration (mm) Inter day Precision (%CV) Inter day Accuracy (%Actual) Please provide a separate table for each In Vitro Binding Bioequivalence Study Table III.13. SOP s Dealing with Analytical Repeats SOP No. Effective Date of SOP SOP Title Please include the complete SOP for Analytical Repeats in your submission.

In-Vitro Kinetic Binding Study Results Table III.14.1 T/R Ratios of Mean Phosphate Binding ph 1.2 Incubation Duration (minutes) Time 1 Test/Reference Ratios (Drug Bound) (n=) Phosphate Concentration 1 (mm) Phosphate Concentration 2 (mm) Phosphate Concentration 3 (mm) T/R ratio T/R ratio T/R ratio Time 2 Time 3 Time 4 Time 5 Time 6 Time 7 Time 8 Example of conditions: lowest concentration at ph 1.2, mid concentration at ph 1.2, highest concentration at ph 1.2, etc. Note: Please specify the times and testing conditions in the table as appropriate. Table III.14.2 T/R Ratios of Mean Phosphate Binding ph 3.0 Incubation Duration (minutes) Time 1 Test/Reference Ratios (Drug Bound) (n=) Phosphate Concentration 1 (mm) Phosphate Concentration 2 (mm) Phosphate Concentration 3 (mm) T/R ratio T/R ratio T/R ratio Time 2 Time 3 Time 4 Time 5 Time 6 Time 7 Time 8 Example of conditions: lowest concentration at ph 3, mid concentration at ph 3, highest concentration at ph 3, etc. Please specify the times and phosphate concentrations as appropriate.

Table 1II.14.3 T/R Ratios of Mean Phosphate Binding ph 5.0 Incubation Duration (minutes) Time 1 Test/Reference Ratios (Drug Bound) (n=) Phosphate Concentration 1 (mm) Phosphate Concentration 2 (mm) Phosphate Concentration 3 (mm) T/R ratio T/R ratio T/R ratio Time 2 Time 3 Time 4 Time 5 Time 6 Time 7 Time 8 Example of conditions: lowest concentration at ph 5, mid concentration at ph 5, highest concentration at ph 5, etc. Please specify the times and phosphate concentrations as appropriate.

In-Vitro Equilibrium Binding Study Results Table III.15. Summary of Mean Binding Data Test (n=) Reference (n=) Total Amount of Mean Bound Phosphate Mean Bound Phosphate Phosphate at Start (mm) %CV %CV Condition 1 (e.g., ph 1.2) Condition 2 (e.g., ph 3) Condition 3 (e.g., ph 5)

SAS Transport Formatted Tables for Data Submission for In-Vitro Binding Studies (For All But Binding Studies of Calcium Acetate Drug Products) 1. For the Kinetic Binding Study: Adsorbate = Analyte (Phosphate, Bile salt, etc.) that binds to the drug Adsorbant = Drug Variable Name Variable Label Variable Type Notes PH ph Numeric ph REP Replicate Numeric Replicate number number BOUND_K Bound Adsorbate Numeric Amount of Adsorbate Bound /Amount of Drug PRODUCT Product name Character Identifier for product (TEST or REF) T1 Incubation Time Numeric Incubation Time point 1 T2 Incubation Time point 2 Numeric Incubation Time T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Incubation Time point 3 Incubation Time point 4 Incubation Time point 5 Incubation Time point 6 Incubation Time point 7 Incubation Time point 8 Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric Incubation Time Incubation Time Incubation Time Incubation Time Incubation Time Incubation Time Note: Please provide separate dataset for each binding condition per product-specific guidance, for example, different concentrations of adsorbate, different ph, with/without acid treatment.

2. For the Equilibrium Binding Study: Adsorbate = Analyte (Phosphate, Bile salt, etc.) that binds to the drug Adsorbent = Drug Variable Name Variable Label Variable Type Notes Terms in Langmuir equation START REMAIN BOUND_E USED Amount of adsorbate at start Amount of adsorbate at equilibrium (unbound) Amount of adsorbate bound Amount of adsorbant (Drug) used Numeric Numeric Amount of adsorbate at start Units = mg Amount of adsorbate at equilibrium Units = mg Numeric [START REMAIN] Amount of adsorbate bound Units = mg Numeric Amount of adsorbant (Drug) used Units = mg or gram XM X/M Numeric Amount Bound adsorbate / Amount of adsorbant (Drug) Used Units = none CEQXM Ceq/(X/M) Numeric Ceq/(X/M) Units = mg PRODUCT Product name Character Identifier for product (TEST or REF) REP Replicate number Numeric Replicate number Ceq x m x/m Ceq/(x/m) Note: Please provide separate dataset for each binding condition per product-specific guidance.