CO 2 -fangst: Separasjonsmetoder,



Similar documents
Impact of coal quality and gasifier technology on IGCC performance

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NGCC AND COAL-FIRED STEAM POWER PLANTS WITH INTEGRATED CCS AND ORC SYSTEMS

COAL GASIFICATION AND CO 2 CAPTURE

B0401 Abstract 029 Oral Presentation Session B04 Innovative Applications and Designs - Tuesday, July 1, :00 h

Hydrogen Production via Steam Reforming with CO 2 Capture

Hydrogen from Natural Gas via Steam Methane Reforming (SMR)

AMMONIA AND UREA PRODUCTION

NITROGEN OXIDES FORMATION in combustion processes COMBUSTION AND FUELS

atm = 760 torr = 760 mm Hg = kpa = psi. = atm. = atm. = 107 kpa 760 torr 1 atm 760 mm Hg = 790.

Process Integration of Chemical Looping Combustion with Oxygen Uncoupling in a Coal-Fired Power Plant

Alstom Development of Oxyfuel PC and CFB Power Plants

Module 5: Combustion Technology. Lecture 34: Calculation of calorific value of fuels

Carbon Dioxide Capture by Chemical Absorption: A Solvent Comparison Study

COMBUSTION. In order to operate a heat engine we need a hot source together with a cold sink

Module 5: Combustion Technology. Lecture 33: Combustion air calculation

Carbon Dioxide Membrane Separation for Carbon Capture using Direct FuelCell Systems

Simulation of a base case for future IGCC concepts with CO 2 capture

Hybrid Power Generations Systems, LLC

How To Run A Power Plant

Putting a chill on global warming

CHAPTER 7 THE DEHYDRATION AND SWEETENING OF NATURAL GAS

Siemens Fuel Gasification Technology at a Glance

Energy Savings in Methanol Synthesis : Use of Heat Integration Techniques and Simulation Tools.

Exergy: the quality of energy N. Woudstra

Praxair, Inc. Ray Roberge Sr. VP and Chief Technology Officer

Balancing chemical reaction equations (stoichiometry)

Calculate Available Heat for Natural Gas Fuel For Industrial Heating Equipment and Boilers

Lecture 35: Atmosphere in Furnaces

Coal-To-Gas & Coal-To-Liquids

IAPWS Certified Research Need - ICRN

The Future of Coal-Based Power Generation With CCS UN CCS Summit James Katzer MIT Energy Initiative web.mit.edu/coal/

IB Chemistry. DP Chemistry Review

COMPARISON OF PROCESS FLOWS: FLUID BED COMBUSTOR AND GLASSPACK

Fact Sheet Technology. Bergius-Pier Process (1)

Chapter 1: Moles and equations. Learning outcomes. you should be able to:

= atm. 760 mm Hg. = atm. d. 767 torr = 767 mm Hg. = 1.01 atm

THERMODYNAMICS. TUTORIAL No.8 COMBUSTION OF FUELS. On completion of this tutorial you should be able to do the following.

From solid fuels to substitute natural gas (SNG) using TREMP

Optimization of Steel and Methanol Production in an Integrated

CCS in the Oil refining Industry System Solutions and Assessment of Capture Potential

Boiler efficiency measurement. Department of Energy Engineering

AS1 MOLES. oxygen molecules have the formula O 2 the relative mass will be 2 x 16 = 32 so the molar mass will be 32g mol -1

Hybrid Membrane Based Systems for CO 2 Capture on Natural Gas and Coal Power Plants

Assignment 8: Comparison of gasification, pyrolysis and combustion

Industrial Oxygen: Its Generation and Use

Drying of Woody Biomass. Process Engineering / GEA Barr-Rosin

CNG, LNG, and Other Fuels from Landfill Gas ---Prospects for Future Development----

Waste to Energy. Anders Damgaard. Thanks to Jiri Hyks and Thomas H Christensen DTU for some slides

Transport phenomena and reaction engineering: basic research and practical applications

Development of large-scale H 2 storage and transportation technology with Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carrier (LOHC)

Unit 5 Practice Test. Name: Class: Date: Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

F321 MOLES. Example If 1 atom has a mass of x g 1 mole of atoms will have a mass of x g x 6.02 x = 7.

IGCC State-of-the-art report

C H A P T E R 3 FUELS AND COMBUSTION

Development of Coal Gasification System for Producing Chemical Synthesis Source Gas

Optimizing DRI production using natural gas

Continuous flow direct water heating for potable hot water

Syngas Purification Units

ATOMS. Multiple Choice Questions

Balance of Fuel Cell Power Plant (BOP)

MHI s Energy Efficient Flue Gas CO 2 Capture Technology and Large Scale CCS Demonstration Test at Coal-fired Power Plants in USA

STOICHIOMETRY OF COMBUSTION

Chapter 1 The Atomic Nature of Matter

Dow Solvent Technologies for CO 2 Removal

The Effect of EPA s Proposed NSPS on. Carbon Capture and Storage Technology

Unit 19 Practice. Name: Class: Date: Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Petroleum Refinery Hydrogen Production Unit: Exergy and Production Cost Evaluation

Simulation of small-scale hydrogen production

SUPPLEMENTARY TOPIC 3 ENERGY AND CHEMICAL REACTIONS

Committed to make a better world

Large Scale Methanol Production from Natural Gas

How To Make A Carbon Capture Plant Workable

Sixth Annual Conference on Carbon Capture & Sequestration

THE MOLE / COUNTING IN CHEMISTRY

Chapter 2 Chemical and Physical Properties of Sulphur Dioxide and Sulphur Trioxide

Nitrogenous Fertilizer Plants

Morris Argyle Assistant Professor Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering. School of Energy Resources Symposium Casper, WY February 28, 2007

Basics of Steam Generation

MODERN TECHNOLOGIES FOR ENERGY AND MATERIAL RECOVERY FROM WASTE. Tomáš Rohal, Business Development CEEI 10-Oct-2013

Calculation of Molar Masses. Molar Mass. Solutions. Solutions

Moles. Balanced chemical equations Molar ratios Mass Composition Empirical and Molecular Mass Predicting Quantities Equations

Coimisiún na Scrúduithe Stáit State Examinations Commission

Yu. F. Vasyuchkov*, M. Yu. Bykova* NEW TECHNOLOGY OF GAS EXTRACTION ON THE BASE OF A COAL TO A HYDROGEN TRANSFER

DIN 2403 Identification of pipelines according to the fluid conveyed. Marking of pipes according to fluid transported

(a) graph Y versus X (b) graph Y versus 1/X

CONTENTS. ZVU Engineering a.s., Member of ZVU Group, WASTE HEAT BOILERS Page 2

Outlook on Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Technology

Chapter Three: STOICHIOMETRY

Chapter 3: Stoichiometry

Power Generation through Surface Coal Gasification

INTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA A? LEVEL PROGRAMME CHM 111: CHEMISTRY MOCK EXAMINATION: DECEMBER 2000 SESSION m/e

Transcription:

CO -fangst: Separasjonsmetoder, energiforbruk og teknologier NORGES TEKNISK-NATURVITENSKAPELIGE UNIVERSITET NTNU CO -håndtering - er vi i rute? Kursdagene, 8. januar 009 1 C+ O CO How and why is CO formed 1 Formation reaction of CO Q + H = H r r Q+ nh = n h h p is enthalpy i i e e p Assuming that both reactants and products are each at a o total pressure of 1 bar and 5 C, and that we assign the value o of zero of all elements at 1 bar and 5 C, Q= Hp = - 393. 5 MJ/kmol CO This is the enthalpy of formation (dannelsesentalpi) of CO

Enthalpy of formation, dannelsesentalpi l Molecular weight Symbol Name kj/mol k/k kg/kmol MJ/kg C Carbon (graphite) 0 1.011 0 O Oxygen 0 31.999 0 H Hydrogen 0.016 0 CH 4 Methane -74.6 16.04-4.650 C H 6 Ethane -83.8 30.069 -.787 CO Carbon monoxide -110.5 8.010-3946 3.946 CH 3 OH Methanol -38.7 3.04-7.449 H O (gas) Water (steam) -41.8 18.015-13.44 H O (liquid) Water -85.8 18.015-15.866 SiO Silicon dioxide -30.7 60.084-5.338 CO Carbon dioxide -393.5 44.010-8.941 CaO Calcium oxide -635.1 56.077-11.35 MgCO 3 Magnesium carbonate -111 84.314-13.185 CaCO 3 Calcium carbonate -107 100.087-1.060 Mg SiO 4 Olivine -177 140.693-0.45 g 4 3 How and why is CO formed Combustion of Methane CH + O CO + H O 4 Q+ nh = n h r i i e e p nh i i= 74873+ 0 r ne h e= 3935 + 4186gas= 877174 p Q = 877174 + 74873 = 80301 kj/kmol CH 4 Q = 80301 kj/kmol CH4 = 50009 kj/kg CH4 Q is here the Lower Heating Value of CH 4 4

How and why is CO formed 3 Combustion of Methane Carbon as comb product CH + O C + H O 4 k/k i i Q = 48365 + 74873 = 408779 kj/kmol e e Q+ nh = n h r p r nh i i nh p = 74873 + 0 = 0 4186 e e gas Q = 408779 kj/kmol CH Combustion of CH of formation of CH 4 4 4 = 5480 kj/kg CH with formation of solid C ("carbon black") reduces the heat to 51% of the LHV. CH 4 4 CO must be formed in order to release the full heat of combustion for a carbon containing fuel for a given fuel, the amount of formed CO is proportional with the chemical energy being converted to heat 5 Converting CO to other carbon-containing substances (1 bar, 5 C) Chemical reaction Heat of reaction [kj/mol CO ] Heat of reaction [MJ/kg CO ] State of C CO C + O 393.5 8.9414 Solid 1 CO CO + O 83.0 6.430 Gas CO + H O( gas) C H4 + O 80.6 18.4 Gas CO + H CH3OH + HO -86.99-1.977 Liquid 1 1 CO + Mg SiO4 MgCO3 + SiO -89 -.0 0 Solid CO + CaO CaCO -178.4-4.054 Solid 3 6

Fuel characteristics for CO -emission Fossil fuels consists of the combustible components Carbon (C) and Hydrogen (H) Methane: C H 1 4 The ratio between carbon and hydrogen gives the amount of CO C H m n n + + O m CO + H O m n 4 m m m > n > n n coal oil natural gas ( ) ( ) ( ) 11. > 05. > 05. coal oil natural gas 7 Emission of CO from fossil fuels per kwhe k am CO n of gr Emissio 1300 Methane (H/C=4) 100 Distillate oil (H/C=) 1100 Lignite (brown coal) 1000 Bituminous coal 900 Anthrasit 800 700 600 500 400 300 00 100 0 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 Efficiency [%] 8

Why is the partial pressure of CO in exhaust gas so low Reactants Products exhaust flue gas Excess air n CmHn +Φ m + ( O + 3.77N) 4 n n n mco + HO + ( Φ 1) m + O + Φ m + 3. 77N 4 4 Gas turbine fired with natural gas: Φ=.-3 Exhaust: 3.-4. volume-% CO Coal fired plant: Φ 1. Exhaust: 1-14 14 volume-% CO Gases has to be separated 9 100 CO partial pressure 10 Partial pressu ure CO [bar] 1 01 0.1 0.01 Gas turbines Oil fired boilers Coal fired boilers Cement kiln off-gas Blast IGCC furnace gas syngas without ih shift Natural gas processing Ammonia production IGCC syngas with ihshift 10

1000 Phase diagram CO Melting/freezing 100 Solid Liquid Transport & Storage condition [bar] Pressure 10 Boiling/condensation Critical point 5.18 bar Vapour -56.6 C Pre-combustion syngas Triple point 1 Sublimationn Sublimation point Oxy-combustion Post-combustion 0.1-100 -90-80 -70-60 -50-40 -30-0 -10 0 10 0 30 40 50 Gas Technology Centre Temperature NTNU SINTEF [ C] 11 sity [kg/m 3 ] Dens Density CO 0. bar 10000 1 bar 3 bar 10 bar 1000 30 bar 73.77 bar 100 bar 150 bar 100 10 1 0.1-55 -35-15 5 5 45 65 85 105 15 145 165 185 05 5 45 65 85 305 35 345 365 385 405 Temperature [ C] 1

1000 Distillation Melting/freezing 100 Solid Liquid Transport & Storage condition [bar] Pressure 10 5.18 bar -56.6 C Triple point Boiling/condensation Vapour Critical point 1 Sublimationn Sublimation point Flue gas must be compressed and cooled, P /P 1 depends on CO partial pressure 5.1795/0.015=345 015=345 bar (1.5% CO ) 0.1-100 -90-80 -70-60 -50-40 -30-0 -10 0 10 0 30 40 50 Gas Technology Centre Temperature NTNU SINTEF [ C] 13 1000 Anti-sublimation Melting/freezing 100 Solid Liquid Transport & Storage condition [bar] Pressure 10 5.18 bar -56.6 C Triple point Boiling/condensation Vapour Critical point 1 Sublimationn Sublimation point Flue gas must be cooled, How low T depends on CO partial pressure 0.1-100 -90-80 -70-60 -50-40 -30-0 -10 0 10 0 30 40 50 Gas Technology Centre Temperature NTNU SINTEF [ C] 14

Pressure [bar] 1000 100 10 Gas-phase separation Melting/freezing Solid Liquid Boiling/condensation Transport & Storage condition Cooling Critical point 5.18 bar Vapour -56.6 C Cooling Triple point 1 Sublimationn Sublimation point Absorption Adsorption Oxy-combustion Membrane Sorbents 0.1-100 -90-80 -70-60 -50-40 -30-0 -10 0 10 0 30 40 50 Gas Technology Centre Temperature NTNU SINTEF [ C] 15 CO quality requirements Canyon Reef Weyburn Esbjerg NETL Component EOR EOR EOR CO > 95% 96% 99,50 % - CO - 01% 0,1 <10ppmv - H O Water vapour No free water. < 0,489 m -3 content in the <0 ppmv equivalent to vapour phase saturation at -5 C 5C 33 K dew point H S < 1500 ppm (weight) 0,9 % - - SO - - < 10 ppmv - Total sulfur < 1450 ppm (weight) - - - 4% <300 ppmv <048% 0.48 <300 ppmv NO X - - < 50 ppmv - O < 10 ppm (weight) <50 ppmv < 10 ppmv < 40 ppmv Glycol 4x10-5 Litre/m 3 - - - CH 4-0.7 % - - C + -.3 % - - Hydrocarbon < 5% - 100 ppmv - Temperature ( C) < 10 F (48.9 C) - - Pressure (MPa) - 15. - 15. 16

Work requirement for CO capture 17 Minimum work for gas separation - 1 1 atm wall 1 atm 1 atm N CO CO N N CO CO Mixing N CO CO N CO CO CO CO CO Mixing: The gases are mixed; the gases are expanded iso-thermally from 1 atm to their partial pressure in the mixture p = P i y i partial pressure of gas i = total pressure volume fraction gas i 18

Minimum work for gas separation - 1 atm wall 1 atm 1 atm N CO CO N CO CO Separation N CO CO N CO CO CO CO CO The exergy lost by mixing, represents the minimum work requirement for separation, wrev W rev i V i = V pdv i [ J] Pamb J wrev = T0Ru yi ln = T0Ru yi ln yi i p i i mol This can also be looked upon as the work of iso-thermal compression of the gas components i from their partial pressure to the ambient pressure 19 Reduction in efficiency when capturing CO Reduction in eff ficiency [%-points] 5.00 % 4.50 % Coal Oil 4.00 % Natural gas 3.50 % 3.00 %.50 %.00 % 1.50 % 1.00 % Minimum reduction in efficiency 1.3% 0.50 % 0.00 % 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0. Volume fraction/partial pressure of CO [bar] Example: CO capture from gas turbine flue gas, y CO =3.6% with MEA absorption/stripper system for CO capture Without CO capture 58% CO capture penalty -8.8% MJ/kg CO Δefficiency With CO capture 49.% Fans, pumps, auxiliary 0.4.0 % Heat for stripping (3.6MJ heat/kg CO ) 0.88 4.55 % Additional fuel consumption: 58/49.-1=18% Sum for atmospheric CO 6.75% Ratio real/theoretical minimum 5. CO compression 037 0.37 04%.04 Sum total 8.79 % 0

CO capture the methods for power plants Coa al, Oil, Natu ural Gas, B iomass Power plant Gasification Reforming Post-combustion CO/H₂ Shift CO/H₂ N₂/O₂ CO₂ separation CO₂ H₂ CO₂₂ H₂ CO₂ separation Pre-combustion O₂ Power plant separation CO₂ Power plant CO₂ Oxy-combustion N₂ N₂/O₂ CO₂ compression & conditioning 1 Post-combustion Low-medium CO partial pressure Medium-high CO Medium-high CO partial pressure partial pressure

Absorption Combined Cycle flue gas 3 SARGAS cycle post-combustion capture at elevated pressure Non-adiabatic combustion, less excess O Benfield/K CO 3 Membranes 4

Membranes Feed gas A, B Rt Retentate tt gas A, B p f,b Support Membrane wall, permeant Permeate gas C, B, A t m p p,b B, A Sweep gas C Permeability description of gas flux through the membrane Selectivity which gases are transported q P J = = p p ( p, p, ) 3 m (STP) J i is the flux, m h 3 pi, m(stp) q p,i volumetric flow rate, h i f i p i A Am t m the membrane surface area, m m t m the membrane thickness, m 3 m(stp) P is the permeability, mhbar P 3 m (STP) is the permeance, tm m h bar p f and p p (p f > p p ) are the partial pressures of the permeated gas at the feed and permeate sides, Gas Technology Centre respectively, NTNU SINTEF bar. 5 Pre-combustion CO capture 6

Pre-combustion - principle Split the C x H y -molecules into H and CO Transfer heating value from C x H y to H Separate CO from H Coal Oil Natural gas Gasifier Reformer H CO Shift H CO CO capture H to combustion Oxidizer H O CO O 7 IGCC without CO capture Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Quench water Recovered heat Quench/ heat recovery Particulate removal Sulfur removal H S Raw syngas Coal feed Gasifier O Hydrogen-rich gas Separation Unit Compressed air HRSG Recovered heat Gas turbine ST G 8

Solid fuel gasifier Pressurized water inlet Fuel Oxygen, steam Pressurized water outlet Burner Siemens SFG gasifier Cooling screen Quench water Cooling jacket Gas outlet t Granulated slag 9 IGCC with CO capture Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Quench water Recovered heat Quench/ heat recovery Raw syngas Particulate removal Steam Shift reaction Selexol l Sulfur Rectisol removal Fluor Solvent H S CO capture CO Coal feed O Gasifier Hydrogen-rich gas CO storageg Separation Unit Compressed air HRSG Recovered heat Gas turbine ST G 30

IGCC with CO capture Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Quench water Recovered heat Quench/ heat recovery Particulate removal Shift reaction Sulfur removal H S CO capture CO Raw syngas Steam Coal feed O Separation Unit Gasifier Compressed air Hydrogen-rich gas TIT reduction HRSG Recovered heat CO storageg Gas turbine ST Fuel dilution G 31 Oxy-combustion CO capture 3

Oxy-combustion Reactants Products exhaust flue gas excess ratio n CmHn +Φ m + ( O + 3.77N) 4 n n n mco + HO + ( Φ 1) m + O + Φ m + 3. 77N 4 4 3-14% CH4 + O CO + H O Combustion without the nitrogen in the air Zero excess oxygen 1 kg methane requires 4 kg oxygen 33 Oxy-combustion the principle i for the power cycle CO and/or H O recycle - liquid or gas hydrocarbon C,H O Separation Unit Conversion system Flue gas CO + H O CO to storage H O extraction 34

Oxy-combustion - air separation Separation Technologies Membrane Cryogenic distillation Adsorption o Polymeric Ceramic Pressure Swing Vacuum Swing Vacuum Pressure membrane membrane Adsorption Adsorption Swing Adsorption (PSA) (VSA) (VPSA) Electrically driven membrane Partial pressure driven membrane 35 Dilution of CO Oxy-combustion H O; 14.3 % ; 3. % H O; 16.9 % SO ; 0.3 % ; 13.5 % Ar; 4.8 % O ; 0%.0 Ar; 1.9 % O ; 4.9 % CO ; 75.7 % Oxy-combustion natural gas Oxy-combustion coal CO ; 6.5 % Pressure 1 atm CO partial pressure 0.6-0.8 atm 36

Oxy-combustion coal 30 MW thermal Schwarze Pumpe Commissioning Sept 9, 008 Vattenfall Germany 37 Oxy-combustion catalyst Mixed conducting membrane N Oxygen mixed conduction membrane CH 4 e - CO H O - O T=800-1000 C Source: Sven Gunnar Sundkvist, Oct. 003 Gas turbine process + steam turbine process The GT combustor is replaced with a mixed conductive membrane reactor (MCM) Separation of O from air by the membrane Combustion of fuel Gas without Technology presence Centre of NTNU SINTEF Heat exchange (combustion heat to oxygen depleted air) 38

Chemical Looping Combustion C Fuel Metal Metal oxidation T Metal oxide Metal oxide reduction CO +HO T Oxygen depleted air 14% O Cooling CO and H O condensation Compression and storage H O CH Reduction 4( g) + 4MeO(s) CO ( g) + H O(g) + 4Me(s) Oxidation Me(s) + 1/ O( g) MeO( s) MeO=NiO supported on NiAl O 4 Other alternatives: Cu, Fe, Mg 39 Conclusions No clear winner among the technologies (still) The will to build demo plants moves many towards post-combustion methods Retrofit, post-combustion most likely Combined CO and SO capture for retrofit Large addition of engineering knowledge has been added in last 3 years Oxygen ion transport membranes Efficiency potential Very challenging Coal: Pre-,,p post, oxy-combustion? Environmental impact of emissions of chemicals to air needs proper attention 40

Takk! TCCS-5 5 th Trondheim Conference on CCS http://www.ntnu.no/tccs5 41