Contents. Table of Cases Irish Cases EC Cases United Kingdom Cases United States Cases Australian Cases Miscellaneous Legislation



Similar documents
Private Enforcement The situation in the UK

Executive summary and overview of the national report for Denmark

Knowledge. Practical guide to competition damages claims in the UK

LAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE) AMENDMENT BILL 2001

Submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council Universal Periodic Review Session 13: United Kingdom November 2011

The Foundation of the International Association of Defense Counsel SURVEY OF INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION PROCEDURES: A REFERENCE GUIDE

SUBMISSION OF THE LAW SOCIETY S WORKING PARTY TO THE LEGCO LEGAL AFFAIRS PANEL REGARDING THE OPERATIONS OF RECOVERY AGENTS IN HONG KONG

Assise de la Justice Brussels, 21 & 22 November Presentation by Maura McGowan QC Chairman of the Bar Council of England and Wales

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

COMMITTEE ON COURT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE REVIEW OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE IN RELATION TO PERSONAL INJURIES LITIGATION

Contents. Part I The issues in perspective 1. Part II The tort system in theory Introduction: surveying the field 3

Class Actions in Competition Law

ReDBox SUPPORT AGREEMENT

Author. Contact Details. Older Persons Elder Abuse Prevention Unit. Daniel Hann

How To Write A Letter To The European Commission On A Number Of Issues

Limitation of Liability

Submission by Free Legal Advice Centres (FLAC) 13 Lower Dorset Street Dublin 1

CPI Antitrust Chronicle February 2014 (2)

LEGAL AID ADVISORY COMMITTEE REVIEW INTO ESTABLISHING A CONTINGENCY LEGAL AID FUND IN NORTHERN IRELAND

THE JACKSON REFORMS. Lord Justice Jackson s review of Civil litigation costs and the impact on insurers. Nicola Billen. The Jackson Reforms

RESPONSE TO EUROPEAN COMMISSION CONSULTATION ON CROSS BORDER CARE

UK Human Rights Abuse - Overview of the Bribery Act, 2005

Scottish Government Removal of the 3 year limitation period from civil actions for damages for personal injury for in care survivors of historical

Civil Justice for Victims of Crime in England and Wales

A response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers

The Jackson Report - insurance industry myths and the reality for employers. Tom Jones Head of Policy & Public Affairs Thompsons Solicitors

Avant welcomes the opportunity to provide input into the Productivity Commission s draft report on Access to Justice Arrangements.

Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: Implications for Personal Injury Litigation

Administrative law continued joint seminar (Federal Court and Law Administrative Appeals Tribunal

Implementation Plan: Development of an asset and financial planning management. Australian Capital Territory

FINAL JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER. This matter is before the Court on a Final Pretrial Conference pursuant to R. 4:25-1.

PRODUCT LIABILITY (AMENDMENT) ACT (NORTHERN IRELAND) 2001

DAPTO HIGH SCHOOL. YEAR 11 LEGAL STUDIES Preliminary Mid-Course Examination 2009

Ethical Corporate Management Best Practice Principles

THE POSSIBILITIES FOR PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT OF THE COMPETITION RULES IN THE NETHERLANDS

Libel Reform Campaign Initial summary assessment of the Defamation Bill

CONSULTATION QUESTIONS

Royaume-Uni Cour suprême. United Kingdom Supreme Court

Global Guide to Competition Litigation Poland

Contents. Wolhuter Lorraine Victimology : victimisation and victims' rights. xii xiv xvi. Acknowledgements Table of Cases Table of Statutes

Australian Proportionate Liability Regime

Department of Justice for Northern Ireland Alternative Methods of Funding Money Damages Claims

Index. Cambridge University Press Atiyah s Accidents, Compensation and the Law: Eighth Edition Peter Cane. Index.

Implementation of the Jackson Reforms. The key changes.

Response to Insurance Contracts Amendment Bill December Submission on behalf of Legal Aid NSW. Consumer Action Law Centre,

Global Guide to Competition Litigation Japan

Legislative - Federal

Consumer redress for misleading and aggressive practices: summary of final report

Ageing strategies. Introduction. April 2011 On...

Introduction. This answering guide has been prepared in order to make the task of responding to the questionnaire easier for citizens.

THE REGULATION OF PUBLIC CHARITES AND PRIVATE FOUNDATIONS IN HAWAII. By: Hugh.R.Jones i

INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY OF MATRIMONIAL LAWYERS EUROPEAN CHAPTER

Australian Product Liability Trends: Class Actions & Litigation Funding

CERTIFICATE PROGRAMS

Department of Enterprise Trade and Employment. 27 th February No 1 of The Social Welfare and Pension Act 2008

EU Digital Copyright Law and the End-User

Online Copyright Infringement. Discussion Paper

PEOPIL The Pan-European Organisation of Personal Injury Lawyers

1.3. This submission addresses two aspects of the Options Paper:

Civil Justice Council response to Insurance Task Force interim report. May 2015

Damages Based Agreements: The Basics

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH FIXED RECOVERABLE COSTS PROPOSALS FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE: Implications for patients access to justice and for patient safety

The Modern Law of Negligence

State Aid, Subsidy and Tax Incentives under EU and WTO Law. Claire Micheau. 0 Wolters Kluwer Law & Business

SEC Adopts Whistleblower Rules Under Dodd-Frank

A response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers

AS Citizenship Definitions

THE MANAGEMENT OF SICKNESS ABSENCE BY NHS TRUSTS IN WALES

Structured Settlements: The Law and Practice

CASE TRACK LIMITS AND THE CLAIMS PROCESS FOR PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS

JEFFREY AXELRAD S PRESENTATION FOR FDA TASK FORCE APRIL 14, 200 PUBLIC MEETING REGARDING IMPORTATION OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS

Dedication...V Contents... IX Abbreviations... XVII

EUROPEAN COMMISSION GREEN PAPER A EUROPEAN ORDER FOR PAYMENT PROCEDURE AND MEASURES TO SIMPLIFY AND SPEED UP SMALL CLAIMS LITIGATION

^M&gmm COMPENSATION FOR PERSONAL INJURY NEW ZEALAND REPORT OF THE ROYAL COMMISSION OF INQUIRY DECEMBER 1967

HARMONISATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAW IN THE EU

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS ORDER No. 689

ITS TIME TO TALK LAWS PROTECTING CHILDRENC F L FAMILY LAW. Presented by Maha Najjarine 20 February 2013

PHILIP LAURENCE CARR

Volume 3, Spring Issue, 1990 ENVIRONMENTAL ACCIDENTS: PERSONAL INJURY AND PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITY

Supreme Court Judgment in Coventry and Ors v Lawrence and another [2015] UKSC 50

Unite the Union believes that the ban on referral fees should not impact

Private anti-trust remedies under US law

This matter was opened to the Court by Jeffrey S. Chiesa, Attorney General of New Jersey, Louis G. Karagias, Deputy

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (DoH) MEDICAL ACT 1983 (AMENDMENT) AND MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS ORDER 2006 A PAPER FOR CONSULTATION

Whether the government is correct in describing the UK as the whiplash capital of the world

LEGCO QUESTION NO. 18 (Written Reply)

Insurance Seminar on Catastrophic Injury 24 September 2015

Munkman on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death

Third Party Litigation Funding

Collective Actions in Europe

Bar Council response to the Reducing Legal Costs in Clinical Negligence Claims pre-consultation paper

6. Ireland considers that no further individual measures are required.

The Role of the Attorney- General: an Australian Perspective

ISSUES PAPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND JURISDICTIONAL LIMIT IN SMALL CLAIMS

Personal injury compensation legislation

ORAL STATEMENT ON ACCESS TO JUSTICE REVIEW FINAL REPORT: 13 SEPTEMBER 2011

Faculty of Law Fall Semester 2015

The criminal and civil justice systems in England and Wales

MMS Smartguide. Guide to Private Antitrust Litigation

Transcription:

Contents Table of Cases Irish Cases EC Cases United Kingdom Cases United States Cases Australian Cases Miscellaneous Legislation xvii xvii xviii xix xx xxi xxiii 1: INTRODUCTION 1 Overview 1 Structure of the Book 4 Some Issues Not Addressed in this Book 6 2: DAMAGES ACTIONS: ENFORCEMENT OR COMPENSATION 9 Introduction 9 The Purpose of Private Actions: Enforcement Privatised? 10 The Commission Initiative 10 Private Actions to Enforce Competition Law 10 Views of the Commissioners and Staff of the Commission 11 The White Paper: A Shift in Emphasis? 14 Community Law on the Concept of Private Enforcement 16 Private Antitrust Law Enforcement: The American Model 19 Antitrust Modernization Commission 23 Commission Following the American Model? 24 Private Enforcement of the Competition Rules in Ireland 25 The Competition Act 1991 and Competition (Amendment) Act 1996 25 Competition Act 2002 28 Ireland Post 2002 Act: A Mixed Model with a Hole in it 28 Private Action as Enforcement Tool: Is it an Appropriate and/or an Effective Concept? 30 Wils Three Tasks of Antitrust Enforcement 31 Clarifying and Developing the Law 31 Deterrence and Punishment 36 Pursuit of Corrective Justice through Compensation 48 Conclusion 49

xii CONTENTS 3: DAMAGES ACTIONS FOR COMPENSATION: WHO CAN SUE AND FOR WHAT? 51 Introduction 51 Who is Actually Injured and Therefore Can or Should Sue in Damages? 52 Unidentifiable Victims 53 Primary Victims 54 Secondary Victims 55 Tertiary Victims 58 Secondary Victims Revisited: Indirect Purchasers and the Passing on Defence 58 The US Experience of Indirect Purchasers and the Passing on Defence 60 Federal Law, Hanover Shoe and Illinois Brick 60 A Different Approach in Various States 61 A Solution to Illinois Brick 63 The Commission s Solution to the Indirect Purchaser and Passing on Conundrum 63 Ireland and the Problem of Indirect Purchasers and the Passing on Defence 65 The Complex Compromise Solution 66 Defining Damages in Private Competition Cases: The Commission Initiative 67 Manfredi Answers the Question 70 Harm and Full Compensation for Loss Suffered 72 Legislating for Quantification of Damages 72 Damages but Not Restitutionary Damages 74 Defining Damages in Competition Cases in Ireland: Donovan v ESB 79 Damages in Donovan 80 Quantifying Damages 82 The But-for World 82 A Variety of Methods for Quantifying Loss 83 Simple Calculation Methods 83 More Complex Calculation Methods 84 The Sampling Method 85 The Ex Aequo et Bono Quantification 85 Some Criticism of Proposed Guidelines 86 Summing Up 87 Conclusion 87 4: COLLECTIVE REDRESS 89 Introduction 89 Recap: Legal Requirement for Effective Redress 90 The Debate in Europe 93 Funding the Action 96 Defining, Representing and Controlling the Group or Class 97 Quantification and Distribution of Damages 98 Two Options for Redress: the Commission s Proposals in the White Paper 100

CONTENTS xiii Overview of the US Class Action 102 Reasons for this Overview 102 Some Standout Features of the US Class Action 103 Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 105 Class Certification 107 Clayton Antitrust Act and Treble Damages 108 Cy-près Doctrine 108 Some concerns with the US Class Action Procedure 111 Abuses exaggerated 114 A Case Study of Abuse in Class Actions: The Mirfasihi Settlement 117 A Case Study of Success in Class Actions: The NASDAQ antitrust litigation 119 Steps towards Reform: The Class Action Fairness Act 2005 123 The UK Models for Collective Redress 124 Reasons for this Overview 124 Collective Redress in the UK: A Lively Debate 125 Overview of the Law on Collective Redress 130 The Test Case, Joinder and Consolidation of Actions 130 Representative Actions 131 Group Litigation Orders 134 Section 47B of the Competition Act 1998 135 The CJC Recommendations 137 The UK Government s View on the CJC s Recommendations 137 BIS Consultation in 2012 on Private Actions in Competition Law: A Consultation on Options for Reform 138 Conclusion 139 5: COLLECTIVE REDRESS FOR BREACH OF COMPETITION LAW IN IRELAND 140 Introduction: Collective Redress in Ireland, the Need, the Law and the Policy 140 The Legal Need to Safeguard Citizens Rights under the Treaty 141 Irish Shortcomings on the Legal Right to Sue under the Treaty 143 Does the Competition (Amendment) Act 2012 Solve the Problem? 144 No Right of Action for Consumers with Small Claims? 145 State Liability to Compensate Victims of Infringements? 148 Some Reasons for Introducing Class Actions in Irish Law 150 A Benefit to the State as Defendant: Army Hearing Loss Cases 150 The Law in Ireland on Multi-Party, Representative and Class Actions 152 Consumer Protection Act 2007 152 Law Reform Commission and Multi-party Litigation 153 Representative Actions 153 Joinder and Consolidation 156 The Test Case 157 The Competition Authority s Evolving View 157 Cost to the Economy 158 No Reward for Plaintiffs 160

xiv CONTENTS Counter Arguments to the Competition Authority s View 161 Small Sums in Damages Dispersals 161 Difficulty Proving Loss 162 Class Action Settlements 162 Disproportionate Rewards for Lawyers 165 Initiation of Cases by Legal Firms 166 Competition Authority Submission to Commission Green Paper on Damages Actions 166 Towards a Coherent European Approach to Collective Address 167 Public Policy in Ireland on Damages and Collective Redress 169 Concerns Raised by the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment 169 Procedural Autonomy of Member States 170 Principle of Effectiveness or Effet Utile 171 Does the Commission have Competence to Legislate and Harmonise Procedural Rules? 172 Exclusive Competence of Commission and Subsidiarity 174 Legal Basis for Harmonising National Procedural Rules in Competition Damages Actions 176 Public Policy and Collective Redress 177 Department s View on Collective Redress 179 Conclusion 181 6: LITIGATION FUNDING, CONTINGENT FEES AND THE LAW OF CHAMPERTY 182 Introduction 182 The Funding Barrier to Private Actions 182 The Law on Maintenance and Champerty 184 Maintenance 185 Champerty 185 Trilogy of Irish Cases on Maintenance and Champerty in Ireland 186 Contingency Fees and Conditional Fee Agreements 189 Contingency (or Contingent) Fee Agreements 189 Conditional Fee Agreements 192 Silence of the Commission on Contingency and Conditional Fees 192 Are Contingency or Conditional Fee Agreements the Solution to the Funding Problem in Ireland? 193 Litigation Funding by Third Party Professional Funders 194 Maintenance and Champerty Again 197 Funding Litigation in Ireland: A Confused and Inconsistent State of Affairs 197 Legislation and Guidelines on Solicitors Fees 198 No Foal, No Ree or No Win, No Fee 201 Do No Win, No Fee Arrangements Really Exist? 202

CONTENTS xv Public Policy on Maintenance and Champerty in the Irish Cases 203 Public Policy and the Law of Maintenance and Champerty in England and Wales 205 Legislative Change 205 Recent Case Law and Changing Judicial Attitudes to Funding Litigation 206 Developments in Australia 210 Conclusion: Litigation Funding and Contingency or Conditional Fees for Damages Actions in Ireland? 212 7: INCENTIVISING PRIVATE ACTIONS 213 Introduction 213 The Green Paper and Double Damages 213 The Case for Multiple Damages 217 Double Damages: A Punitive Remedy 221 Double Damages: Overcompensation for Plaintiffs? 223 Double Damages in Ireland: A Fanciful Idea? 227 An Alternative Approach 228 The Department s Response 230 Double Damages for Competition Law Infringements? 231 Conclusion: Double Damages for Standalone Actions 232 8: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS 233 Introduction 233 The Financial Crisis and Ireland s Bailout 233 Structural Reforms: Competition Conditions 234 Competition (Amendment) Act 2012 236 Divorcing Public and Private Enforcement 237 Injunctions 238 Res Judicata 241 Conclusion 243 9: CONCLUSIONS 244 Findings and Recommendations 244 Private Actions for Damages in Ireland: Why and How? 245 Private Actions for Damages in Ireland Why? 245 Private Actions for Damages in Ireland How? 246 The Need for Effective Collective Redress 246 Litigation Funding 248 Incentivising Private Actions 248 Competition (Amendment) Act 2012 249 Conclusion: Damages Actions in Ireland, Where are we Now? 249

xvi CONTENTS Bibliography 251 Books and Chapters in Books 251 Journal Articles 252 Consultations, Reports, Submissions, Papers 255 Newspaper Articles 257 Speeches and Conference Papers 258 Legislation, Notices, Parliamentary Debates, Press Releases and Miscellaneous Sources 258 Index 261