THE POSSIBILITIES FOR PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT OF THE COMPETITION RULES IN THE NETHERLANDS
|
|
- Gilbert Casey
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 THE POSSIBILITIES FOR PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT OF THE COMPETITION RULES IN THE NETHERLANDS A survey commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - Amsterdam, 3 November 2005 Mr. M.F.J. Haak Mr. I.W. VerLoren van Themaat
2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction 1) Practice shows that private enforcement of competition rules is a scarce phenomenon in the Netherlands and in the other EU-Member States. Countless obstacles stand in the way of an effective access to the civil court in competition law related matters. This was at least the conclusion of a study published by the European Commission in 2004 about the rules of law and the legal practice in the 25 EU-Member States with respect to private actions in case of infringement of competition rules (the "Ashurst report"). The European Commission has notified that it wishes to facilitate actions for damages because of infringement of the European competition rules. 2) In the light of these developments the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs asked Houthoff Buruma in August 2005 which obstacles are met by a party affected by a competition law infringement in the Netherlands if he wishes to claim damages in this respect. The Ministry also asked Houthoff Buruma to suggest possible solutions for removing or mitigating these obstacles. 3) With this report Houthoff Buruma intends to provide the Minister of Economic Affairs with a framework on the basis of which it can give shape the its policy for private enforcement. This report is therefore based on the wish of the European Commission and the Ministry of Economic Affairs to encourage private enforcement of competition law rules. Where possible, this report contains various options. Dutch practice (chapter 1) 4) Dutch practice confirms the conclusions of the Ashurst report. Although the number of judgments of civil courts in competition law related matters has increased in the past 30 years, the number of cases remains very low. At first there were hardly any cases at all, and since 1999 the number of cases has fluctuated between 30 and 40 cases a year. However, the number of times that damages have been awarded in the past 30 years can still be counted on one hand, partly because damages were only claimed a very few times. More in general it is remarkable that the judgments are very seldom related to hard core cartels or clear-cut examples of abuse of a dominant position. In most cases the infringement of the competition rules is only alleged with the purpose of producing future changes. The claim is therefore usually aimed - mostly in injunctive relief proceedings - at a prohibition or an order for specific conduct. As a defence the competition rules are usually relied on in order to have a contractual obligation annulled. 5) Possible reasons for the scarce number of actions for damages are problems related to evidence, the forms of compensation, the so-called passing-on defence, indirect actions, costs, collectivity and concern about the quality of the administration of justice.
3 Evidence (chapter 2) 6) With respect to the evidence, the Dutch civil court has in principle sufficient instruments to satisfy the victim of an infringement of competition rules in legal proceedings. If a claimant cannot prove all the facts, the court may deduce any unknown facts from the facts that are known. In this way the court may reach a presumption of infringement. In our present legal system the court is also entitled, moreover, to decide that the (alleged) infringer has to give reasons and, if possible, to provide documentation for contesting an infringement alleged by the claimant. A claimant with some background knowledge of the doings of the defendant can also ask for concrete evidence, insofar as he has a legitimate interest in this and if he is a party to the legal relationship for which the evidence is of relevance. The court may also exofficio ask for documents. 7) It is possible, however, that the aggrieved party who can only summarily substantiate that an infringement has occurred, is faced with difficulties when collecting evidence in the prestage of the proceedings. To assist an aggrieved party when collecting information and evidence, the following options may be taken into consideration: a. A possibility for the court on a statutory basis to appoint - by request or ex-officio - an investigator with concrete powers, including the right to hear or to have witnesses heard on oath, comparable to the investigator referred to in article 2:351 of the Dutch Civil Code; b. The entire or partial publication of the factual investigation report drawn up by the Competition Regulation Department of the NMa (Netherlands Competition Authority); c. A general statutory duty for (potential) parties to the proceedings to provide the other party with all the information that may reasonably be useful for the disclosure of evidence that is of relevance to the proceedings. A further investigation would have to be carried out into the English and the American pre trial discovery and the possibilities of incorporating this into in the Dutch system of legal procedure; d. An extension of the powers of the civil court on a statutory basis, so that the court is also entitled to ex-officio request specific documents in the pre-stage of the proceedings; e. A statutory restriction of the possibility of the civil court to differ from the judgment of a decision of a competition authority, in which an infringement has been assumed. The following alternatives may be taken into consideration:
4 i. A rebuttable legal presumption that an infringement established in a final decision of a competition authority has occurred; ii. A higher level of the obligation to provide reasons, enshrined in the law, if the civil court differs from the final decision of a competition authority. 8) We are of the opinion that the possibility of a decision of a competition authority against which an appeal can be made having binding effect on the civil court, is going too far. Our main objection is that an administrative decision cannot be put on a par with a judgment in a defended action from an independent court, although this has been possible in Germany since 1 July ) A typical problem for evidence and evidence to the contrary is the confidentiality of documents. An action is decided by the provision of specific evidence that contains corporate confidential information. Both the claimant and the defendant may be faced with the diabolic choice to either submit specific sensitive company information that is required for being assessed by the court in his favour, or to have the confidentiality prevail with the risk of losing the case. Civil procedural law does not offer a real solution to this dilemma. Damages (chapter 3) 10) In theory damages exist in many forms, such as compensation for loss suffered or for loss of profit, surrender of profits, statutory interest, compensation for immaterial damage and exemplary damages. 11) In the Netherlands the civil court may in principle choose a way of assessing the loss that is geared best to the specific situation. If the loss cannot be established accurately, it can be calculated or even estimated. We do no see any reason for giving a legal basis to specific economic models as possible or even obligatory methods for the calculation of loss. 12) The civil court may rely, as the occasion arises, on the claimant's statements regarding the loss. It may decide that the defendant be obliged to provide information and evidence for assessing the loss. This may be both incriminating and exculpatory information. If the defendant does not sufficiently act upon this order, the court may draw the conclusions it deems fit. In the light of the endeavours of the European Commission to stimulate private enforcement, it can be considered to hold out the prospect to the aggrieved party of higher damages than that are currently possible or usual. In this respect the following options can be considered:
5 a. The possibility on a statutory basis to allow higher damages than the real loss suffered (also known as exemplary damages). The following alternatives are possible; i. A hard and fast rule: an instruction for the court to determine the compensation at x times the loss suffered, from which it is not allowed to deviate (as currently done in the United States), or ii. iii. A hard and fast rule with the possibility for adjustments: an instruction for the court to determine the compensation at x times the loss suffered, with the possibility of judicial mitigation, or Discretionary powers of the court to allow x times the loss suffered, so that it can take into account the circumstances, such as the imputability, the nature of the infringement (hard core or no hard core), the duration and the scope thereof. b. An increase of the statutory interest in competition law related matters, the high commercial interest of article 6:119a of the Dutch Civil Code, for instance. This interest would then be calculated over the loss suffered. Both in the event of an increase of the statutory interest, and in the event of the exemplary damages, harmonisation at European level is urgently desired. In addition these options have to be seen in connection with other measures. In chapter 4, for example, the option is discussed that not only the direct purchaser but also the indirect purchaser (viz. the end user) has an action for damages. This also implies an increased liability of the infringer. The combination of both increased interest and exemplary damages seems to be (too) much of a good thing. Finally we suggest that these two options be limited to hard core cartel cases exclusively. c. To strengthen the objectives of leniency programmes, i.e. destabilising and breaking up cartels, a leniency granted by a competition authority to an informant might automatically affect his civil liability. It could be considered, for instance, to limit the leniency in the sense that the informant will only be obliged to compensate the loss if it cannot be recovered from the other cartel members. Passing-on and indirect actions (chapter 4) 13) A special question is to what extent an infringer can defend himself with the defence that his direct purchaser has not suffered any loss, because the latter has fully passed on the supra-competitive price to later links in the distribution chain. This is the passing-on defence. In the United States the court has rejected this defence. In Germany the passing-on defence has been excluded by law this year. The Dutch Supreme Court has not yet given its opinion on
6 this question. There is a good chance that the passing-on defence will not be allowed in the Netherlands either. The direct purchaser will in that event be able to fully claim back the overcharged price from the infringer, his supplier. 14) A related question is whether indirect purchasers, such as consumers and middlemen, can also claim damages from the infringer. After all, they cannot recover the loss from their supplier, because the supplier has not infringed the competition rules and cannot be blamed for passing on his own costs. 15) A claim from an indirect purchaser can fail for two reasons. Firstly it is required that the infringer must have violated a norm that is also intended to provide protection against such loss, better known as the relativity requirement. It seems more logical to presume that the purpose of competition law is to protect the consumer, than that it is also meant to protect middlemen. Secondly, the indirect purchaser must prove that the paid price would have been lower without the infringement (the causation between the loss and the infringement). Furnishing such evidence is usually very complex. 16) In the literature it is usually assumed that the disallowance of the passing-on defence entails that an indirect action is not possible. If so, the infringer would be obliged to compensate the loss several times: once to the direct purchaser, once to the end user and possibly even to every middleman (if the latter group were also protected by competition law). 17) In the Netherlands it has not yet been decided in case-law whether an indirect purchaser has a claim for damages against the infringer. The indirect action is necessary for the implementation of the objective of the Commission that it should - also - be possible for consumers to claim damages. It is true that the indirect action is prohibited at federal level in the United States, but it is allowed in some States. In Germany the possibility of the indirect action has recently been laid down in the law. We expect that an indirect consumer action must be considered to be possible under the current laws. 18) In this light we do not see any reason to suggest any options for possible additional legislation in connection with the passing-on defence or the indirect action. Costs (chapter 5) 19) Before proceedings can be instituted, a claimant has to invest in the costs for a lawyer and for possible party appointed experts. In competition law related matters, for example, usually an economic analysis has to be made and often an accountant will have to be engaged for advice on the extent of the loss. These advisory fees only qualify for compensation in the Netherlands to a limited extent, if the proceedings are won. The unsuccessful party will have to bear its own costs.
7 20) The order for costs includes a compensation for the fee of the lawyer in connection with the proceedings. This is a fixed fee determined according to the regulation of the 'Courtapproved scale of costs'. This rate is usually substantially lower than the real costs. If the lawyer has tried to reach an amicable settlement out-of-court, these costs will in general only be compensated - at a fixed rate - to a limited extent as well. 21) The costs of other party appointed experts and any internal costs in connection with the proceedings will be compensated insofar as (i) it is reasonable that such costs have been incurred and (ii) the amount of the costs are reasonable (the 'double test of reasonableness'). 22) Also the successful defendant will receive a similar (limited) compensation for the lawyer's fees in connection with the proceedings. Until recently it was assumed that the successful defendant was not entitled to claim compensation of (reasonable) costs of party appointed experts engaged by him. It seems, however, that the Supreme Court has recently opened the door for this possibility. 23) The consequence of this practice is twofold. In one respect this practice - in particular for parties with relatively limited loss - is an obstacle to seek redress in court. The costs of proceedings do not counterbalance the possible benefits. In another respect this practice reduces the risk of legal proceedings for the claimant and in this sense it might even be an incentive for private enforcement. The recent judgment of the Supreme Court might increase the risk of legal proceedings and may therefore imply an extra obstacle for private enforcement of competition laws. 24) The current laws leave room for a larger compensation of the costs of legal assistance as is usual at present and do not exclude a full compensation. It is not expected, however, that the judiciary will allow on its own accord a full compensation in competition law related matters. Insofar as the present legal practice is regarded as inadequate, the following options are conceivable in competition law related matters: a. The successful claimant receives a full compensation of the costs of legal assistance, provided that these costs are within reason; if the defendant wins the case he will only receive the fixed compensation in accordance with the Court-approved scale of costs. b. The compensation of the costs of external party appointed experts on the part of the defendant is reduced or excluded. c. In specific cases it is possible that the costs of party appointed experts of the claimant and the costs of possible judicial experts will be state-funded.
8 d. The aforementioned possibilities can be limited in three ways: i. to the most serious infringements of competition rules, the hard core cartel arrangements; ii. iii. to collective claims or joint actions with sufficient level of support and/or to consumer cases. If one of these possibilities is deemed desirable by the legislator, a statutory regulation is recommended. Collectivity (chapter 6) 25) Groups of aggrieved parties are usually faced with problems regarding the financing of an action as well as with procedural problems, because a collective action for damages is not yet possible under the present laws. This applies in particular to small-scale losses suffered by large groups of people. If the legislator sees cause to make changes to the present situation, the following statutory measures may be considered: a. A collective action for damages. This can be limited to (i) infringements of (hard core) competition rules and/or (ii) consumer cases. b. A large compensation for the costs of the action for the benefit of the initiator of the collective action for damages. The court may decide to take off this compensation from the payment to the aggrieved parties. c. The lifting of the prohibition on no cure no pay and quota pars litis for lawyers in the event of a collective loss action or a joint action with sufficient support. In consultation with the Netherlands Bar Association and the Minister of Justice, this might be laid down in a new regulation of the Netherlands Bar Association. Also this possibility can be limited to (i) infringements of (hard core) competition rules and/or (ii) consumer cases. d. An action in which organisations can claim in the public interest that the profits gained with the infringement be paid to the State. This possibility has recently been introduced in Germany. e. Financing a collective action for damages by the government.
9 Quality safeguard (chapter 7) 26) Finally, the fear of a potential claimant to be faced with a judge lacking expertise to deal with competition matters may be an obstacle for private enforcement. This fear is justified to the extent that the various civil courts in the Netherlands are not given sufficient opportunities for gaining experience because of the slight number of competition matters that are brought before the courts every year. 27) This problem, however, has been recognized by the judiciary. Since a few years specialisation and training programmes have been developed and specialised judges are exchanged between the various courts. There is no reason to have doubts in advance as to whether these measures will have the desired effect. 28) The Dutch judge, moreover, may ask the European Commission for information or advice about the interpretation of the European competition rules, or he may appoint more general experts. Also, if required because of the public interest or because of a coherent application of the European competition law, the NMa or the European Commission, on its own initiative, may make observations in an appeal case about the interpretation of these rules. The legislator could consider the following, further-reaching measures: a. Giving exclusive competence to a specific court for civil proceedings regarding an infringement of competition rules. Contra-indications are: i. competence disputes with other exclusively competent authorities; ii. competition law discussions are usually first raised by the defendant by way of a defence. b. Giving alternative (extra) competence to one court. General competence of the civil court to refer questions pertaining to competition law to the NMa seems less logical. Such an obligation denies the obligation of the civil court to take a decision itself about all that the parties have claimed and is therefore also at odds with the premise of the Commission that private enforcement should be encouraged. It is unlikely, moreover, that the decision of an administrative body with its own policy agenda would automatically replace the independent judgment of the court. Houthoff Buruma N.V. (2005)
Executive summary and overview of the national report for Denmark
Executive summary and overview of the national report for Denmark Section I Summary of findings There is no special legislation concerning damages for breach of EC or national competition law in Denmark,
More informationGlobal Guide to Competition Litigation Poland
Global Guide to Competition Litigation Poland 2012 Table of Contents Availability of private enforcement in respect of competition law infringements and jurisdiction... 1 Conduct of proceedings and costs...
More informationKnowledge. Practical guide to competition damages claims in the UK
Knowledge Practical guide to competition damages claims in the UK Practical guide to competition damages claims in the UK Contents Reforms to damages litigation in the UK for infringements of competition
More informationGlobal Guide to Competition Litigation Japan
Global Guide to Competition Litigation Japan 2012 Table of Contents Availability of private enforcement in respect of competition law infringement and jurisdiction... 1 Conduct of proceedings and costs...
More informationProf. Dr. Harald Jatzke Judge at the Supreme Tax Court, Munich. Selected Procedural Issues
Prof. Dr. Harald Jatzke Judge at the Supreme Tax Court, Munich Selected Procedural Issues I. Recusal of a judge from a case II. Opinion process III. Expert evidence IV. Sanctions (refusal to admit comments
More informationInsurance claims and losses in Spain. Procedural aspects of the Spanish legal system
Insurance claims and losses in Spain. Procedural aspects of the Spanish legal system Further information If you would like further information, please contact a person mentioned below or the person with
More informationGADSBY WICKS SOLICITORS EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS
EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS Affidavit: After the event litigation insurance: Application notice: Bar Council: Barrister: Basic Charges: Before the Event Legal Expenses Insurance: Bill of costs: Bolam test:
More informationCOST AND FEE ALLOCATION IN CIVIL PROCEDURE
International Academy of Comparative Law 18th World Congress Washington D.C. July 21-31, 2010 Topic II.C.1 COST AND FEE ALLOCATION IN CIVIL PROCEDURE National Reporter - Slovenia: Nina Betetto Supreme
More informationCCBE POSITION WITH RESPECT TO THE FREE CHOICE OF A LAWYER IN RELATION TO LEGAL EXPENSES INSURANCE
CCBE POSITION WITH RESPECT TO THE FREE CHOICE OF A LAWYER IN RELATION TO LEGAL EXPENSES INSURANCE CCBE position with respect to the free choice of a lawyer in relation to legal expenses insurance The Council
More informationAct on Compensation for Criminal Damage
JLS/1374/05-EN NB: Unofficial translation Act on Compensation for Criminal Damage (935/1973; amendments up to 675/2002 included) General provisions Section 1 (63/1984) (1) Compensation shall be paid from
More informationCOMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of XXX. on the right to legal aid for suspects or accused persons in criminal proceedings
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX C(2013) 8179/2 COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of XXX on the right to legal aid for suspects or accused persons in criminal proceedings EN EN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of XXX
More informationPg. 01 French v Carter Lemon Camerons LLP
Contents French v Carter Lemon Camerons LLP 1 Excelerate Technology Limited v Cumberbatch and Others 3 Downing v Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 5 Yeo v Times Newspapers Limited
More informationGeneral Terms of Purchase. of HAN University of Applied Sciences
General Terms of Purchase of HAN University of Applied Sciences HAN-Terms of Purchase; Page 1 of 6 Versie14 september 2010 Content Article 1 Definitions Article 2 Quotation; Creation Article 3 Applicability
More informationWITNESSES AT TRIAL. Case: Doorson v Netherlands. ECHR Article: Article 6 The Right to a Fair Trial Project group: University of Glasgow
Case: Doorson v Netherlands WITNESSES AT TRIAL ECHR Article: Article 6 The Right to a Fair Trial Project group: University of Glasgow A LANDMARK DECISION A.0 RATIONALE: WHY THIS ARTICLE? WHY THIS JUDGMENT?
More informationThe criminal and civil justice systems in England and Wales
The criminal and civil justice systems in England and Wales Introduction Important differences exist between UK civil and criminal proceedings that have implications for fraud investigations, including
More informationS.B. 88 126th General Assembly (As Introduced)
Elizabeth Dominic Bill Analysis Legislative Service Commission S.B. 88 126th General Assembly (As Introduced) Sens. Coughlin, Goodman BILL SUMMARY Requires the Superintendent of Insurance to establish
More informationDutch Unfair Prejudice. And. Collective claim Proceedings
Dutch Unfair Prejudice And Collective claim Proceedings Höcker Advocaten, The Netherlands Yvette Borrius SHORT INTRODUCTION DUTCH REMEDIES UNFAIR PREJUDICE The most effective mechanism at the disposal
More informationEnvironmental criminal law enforcement in The Netherlands: institutional aspects and experiences
Environmental criminal law enforcement in The Netherlands: institutional aspects and experiences Gustaaf A. Biezeveld, co-ordinating environmental public prosecutor (The Hague) Mr. president, ladies and
More informationGeneral Terms and Conditions of Peak Payroll Services B.V. In these General Terms and Conditions:
General Terms and Conditions of Peak Payroll Services B.V. Article 1 General In these General Terms and Conditions: 1. The Client refers to the party issuing the assignment, and 2. Peak refers to the company
More informationCOMMITTEE ON COURT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE REVIEW OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE IN RELATION TO PERSONAL INJURIES LITIGATION
COMMITTEE ON COURT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE REVIEW OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE IN RELATION TO PERSONAL INJURIES LITIGATION THE SUBMISSIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS FEBRUARY 2003 The executive
More informationA brief guide to professional negligence claims
A brief guide to professional negligence claims Contents Introduction Do I have a claim? Important considerations Pre-action protocol procedure Court proceedings Contact information Introduction Claims
More informationSupreme Court Judgment in Coventry and Ors v Lawrence and another [2015] UKSC 50
Alerter 24 th July 2015 Supreme Court Judgment in Coventry and Ors v Lawrence and another [2015] UKSC 50 The Supreme Court has handed down its Judgment in Coventry v Lawrence in which it considered the
More informationGeneral Terms and Conditions
General Terms and Conditions ARTICLE 1: GENERAL 1. Definitions In these General Terms and Conditions unless the context otherwise requires: a. Agreement means any agreement entered into by the EAIE with
More informationINFORMATION FOR LANDLORDS
NEW JERSEY JUDICIARY INFORMATION FOR LANDLORDS Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division Special Civil Part Landlord/Tenant Section Information for Landlords page 1 Most disputes between landlords and
More informationCODE OF CONDUCT for Court Experts in civil law and administrative law cases
CODE OF CONDUCT for Court Experts in civil law and administrative law cases version 3.7 January 2012 This Code of Conduct was drawn up at the request of the Council for the Judiciary and under the responsibility
More informationAdvice Note. An overview of civil proceedings in England. Introduction
Advice Note An overview of civil proceedings in England Introduction There is no civil code in England; English civil law comprises of essentially legislation by Parliament and decisions by the courts.
More informationIssued by the Association FME-CWM, P.O. Box 190, 2700 AD ZOETERMEER
TRANSLATION of the "Algemene verkoop- en leveringsvoorwaarden voor de technologische industrie". Only the Dutch text of these conditions is authentic. In case of ambiguities or doubts as to the meaning
More informationMASTER ADVERTISING AGREEMENT
MASTER ADVERTISING AGREEMENT THE UNDERSIGNED: 1. [ ] B.V., registered in the trade register with the number [ ], having its registered office in Voorburg, legally represented in this matter by Mr. R. Van
More informationLaw 2735/1999 (the Law) governs international commercial arbitration taking place in Greece. It is based on the UNCITRAL model law.
Ελλάδα Greece Europe Key points Law 2735/1999 (the Law) governs international commercial arbitration taking place in Greece. It is based on the UNCITRAL model law. There are two major arbitral bodies:
More informationIP-Litigation in Germany. German and European Patent, Trademark and Design Attorneys Lawyers
IP-Litigation in Germany German and European Patent, Trademark and Design Attorneys Lawyers What is a litigation team in Germany? In contrast to litigation procedures in certain jurisdictions, in particular
More informationCONTINGENCY FEE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ATTORNEY AND CLIENT
CONTINGENCY FEE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ATTORNEY AND CLIENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of this Day of, 2009 by and between JOSEPH L. KASHI, Attorney at Law, hereinafter called "Attorney" and,
More informationThe Court of Protection Transparency Pilot
The Court of Protection Transparency Pilot Introduction 1. On January 2016 the Court of Protection will begin a pilot scheme aimed at addressing one of the most controversial of its characteristics- its
More informationQueensland WHISTLEBLOWERS PROTECTION ACT 1994
Queensland WHISTLEBLOWERS PROTECTION ACT 1994 Act No. 68 of 1994 Queensland WHISTLEBLOWERS PROTECTION ACT 1994 Section PART 1 PRELIMINARY TABLE OF PROVISIONS Division 1 Title and commencement Page 1 Short
More informationDESIGN RIGHT (JERSEY) LAW 200-
DESIGN RIGHT (JERSEY) LAW 200- Report Explanatory Note Article 1 is an interpretation provision. Article 2 specifies who is the design right owner of a design. Article 3 specifies that the Law applies
More informationConditional Fee Agreement (CFA)
Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA) This agreement is a binding legal contract between you and your solicitor/s. Before you sign, please read everything carefully. This agreement must be read in conjunction
More information1. Does the law in your jurisdiction allow a third party to claim directly under a liability insurance policy?
IBA Insurance Committee Substantive Project 2011 1 Privilege in Insurance Disputes: Argentina Argentina IBA Insurance Committee Substantive Project 2012 Direct Third-Party Access To Liability Insurance
More informationTitle 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES
Title 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES Chapter 337-A: PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT Table of Contents Part 12. HUMAN RIGHTS... Section 4651. DEFINITIONS... 3 Section 4652. FILING OF COMPLAINT; JURISDICTION...
More informationPrivate Enforcement The situation in the UK
Private Enforcement The situation in the UK Paolo Palmigiano, solicitor Chairman of the Association of in-house competition lawyers Union Internationale des Avocats London, March 6 2015 Summary Private
More informationClinical Negligence. Issue of proceedings through to Trial
Clinical Negligence Issue of proceedings through to Trial Lees Solicitors LLP 44/45 Hamilton Square Birkenhead Wirral CH41 5AR Tel: 0151 647 9381 Fax: 0151 649 0124 e-mail: newclaim@lees.co.uk 1 1 April
More informationPERSONAL INJURIES PROCEEDINGS BILL 2002
1 PERSONAL INJURIES PROCEEDINGS BILL 2002 EXPLANATORY NOTES General Outline Purpose of legislation The main purpose of this Act is to facilitate the ongoing affordability of insurance through appropriate
More informationAct on Background Checks
NB: Unofficial translation Ministry of Justice, Finland Act on Background Checks (177/2002) Chapter 1 General provisions Section 1 Scope of application (1) This Act applies to background checks, which
More informationPERSONAL INJURIES BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS TREATED AS ANNEXED TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOLICITOR AND COUNSEL
PERSONAL INJURIES BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS TREATED AS ANNEXED TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOLICITOR AND COUNSEL FOR USE AFTER 31 JANUARY 2013 PLEASE NOTE: THESE TERMS
More informationJUDICIAL REVIEW: A QUICK AND EASY GUIDE
Richard Stein Partner Leigh Day & Co Solicitors Priory House 25 St John s Lane London EC1M 4LB T 020 7650 1200 F 020 7253 4433 E fightthecuts@leighday.co.uk www.leighday.co.uk JUDICIAL REVIEW: A QUICK
More informationMedical Negligence. A guide for clients. The team provides a first class service at all levels of experience. The Legal 500
www.ffw.com/personalinjury Freephone 0800 358 3848 www.ffw.com/personalinjury Freephone 0800 358 3848 Medical Negligence A guide for clients The team provides a first class service at all levels of experience.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE B254585
Filed 2/26/15 Vega v. Goradia CA2/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified
More informationBefore : Mr Justice Morgan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between :
Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWHC 3848 (Ch) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CHANCERY DIVISION 1 Case No: HC12A02388 Royal Courts of Justice, Rolls Building Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL Date: Tuesday,
More informationExpenses and Funding of Civil Litigation Bill Consultation Response by GCC
Expenses and Funding of Civil Litigation Bill Consultation Response by GCC (A) Speculative Fee Agreements: Q1: Do you think that a lack of cap on speculative fee agreements prevents potential pursuers
More informationKey Provisions of Tennessee Senate Bill 200 Effective July 1, 2014, through July 1, 2016
2014 Construction of Statute Definition of Injury (Causation) Revises Section 50-6-116, Construction of Chapter, to indicate that for dates of injury on or after July 1, 2014, the chapter should no longer
More informationLEGAL AID ADVISORY COMMITTEE REVIEW INTO ESTABLISHING A CONTINGENCY LEGAL AID FUND IN NORTHERN IRELAND
LEGAL AID ADVISORY COMMITTEE REVIEW INTO ESTABLISHING A CONTINGENCY LEGAL AID FUND IN NORTHERN IRELAND WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS 1. The Association of Personal Injury
More informationEnglish Civil Law and the Foreign Motorist. Justice or a Lawyer s Lunch?
English Civil Law and the Foreign Motorist Justice or a Lawyer s Lunch? Agenda Basic Principles The Civil Procedure The Claim - Practice Basic principles English Law is based on precedent - what courts
More informationWikiLeaks Document Release
WikiLeaks Document Release February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service Report RS20519 ASBESTOS COMPENSATION ACT OF 2000 Henry Cohen, American Law Division Updated April 13, 2000 Abstract. This report
More informationConditional Fee Agreement: What You Need to Know
Conditional Fee Agreement: What You Need to Know This document forms an important part of your agreement with us. Please read it carefully. Definitions of words used in this document and the accompanying
More informationTermination of employment legislation digest
Please note that this country profile might not reflect the current state of the law on termination of employment. For updated information, you are invited to consult the EPLex database. Termination of
More informationPERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS
PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS Frequently Asked Questions 1. Can I make a claim? If you have been injured because of the fault of someone else, you can claim financial compensation through the courts. The dependants
More informationAPIL/PIBA CFA version 9, for personal injuries and clinical negligence claims, from 1.4.13,
SHORT FORM CFA for use BETWEEN SOLICITORS AND COUNSEL on or after 1 April 2013 in personal injuries and clinical negligence claims (This agreement is not suitable for claims for diffuse mesothelioma.)
More informationBERMUDA INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION (TAX INFORMATION EXCHANGE AGREEMENTS) ACT 2005 2005 : 47
QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION (TAX INFORMATION EXCHANGE 2005 : 47 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 4A 5 5A 6 6A 7 8 8A 9 10 11 12 Short title Interpretation Duties of the Minister Grounds
More informationC.M. Haughey Solicitors Compensation Guide
C.M. Haughey Solicitors Compensation Guide www.cmhaugheysolicitors.ie Athena Goddess of Wisdom, Strength and Strategy. When your experience needs our experience About Us C. M. Haughey Solicitors, located
More informationTerms & Conditions Verder B.V. (02031806) Filed at the Chamber of Commerce on 29-01-2015
Terms & Conditions Verder B.V. (02031806) Filed at the Chamber of Commerce on 29-01-2015 1. General 1.1 These terms and conditions use the following terms and definitions: Product: items, as well as services
More informationEmployment Law Guide
Employment Law Guide Settlement Agreements (Formally known as Compromise Agreements) See the separate guide. Unfair Dismissal Length of employment Employees can only bring a claim for ordinary unfair dismissal
More informationAppendix I: Select Federal Legislative. Proposals Addressing Compensation for Asbestos-Related Harms or Death
Appendix I: Select Legislative Appendix I: Select Federal Legislative is and Mesothelioma Benefits Act H.R. 6906, 93rd 1973). With respect to claims for benefits filed before December 31, 1974, would authorize
More informationPatent Litigation in Germany An Introduction (I)
Patent Litigation in Germany An Introduction (I) By Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar, Dr. jur. Carl-Richard Haarmann Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar Senior Partner, Boehmert & Boehmert, Munich, and Honorary Professor for
More informationMUST-DO STRATEGIES TO WIN AN UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION CLAIM By Anton J Moch
MUST-DO STRATEGIES TO WIN AN UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION CLAIM By Anton J Moch 1. Apply The Law Of Unemployment Compensation A. Presumptions: (1) Purpose. Unemployment compensation is intended for individuals
More informationConditional Fee Agreement: What You Need to Know
Conditional Fee Agreement: What You Need to Know This document forms an important part of your agreement with us. Please read it carefully. Definitions of words used in this document and the accompanying
More informationSTATUTORY INSTRUMENTS. S.I. No. 623 of 2006 EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (EUROPEAN PUBLIC LIMITED-LIABILITY COMPANY) (EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT) REGULATIONS 2006
STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS. S.I. No. 623 of 2006 EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (EUROPEAN PUBLIC LIMITED-LIABILITY COMPANY) (EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT) REGULATIONS 2006 (Prn. A6/2135) 2 [623] S.I. No. 623 of 2006 EUROPEAN
More informationRisk of coverage gaps in commercial insurance contracts
Christian Drave, LL.M. Versicherungspraxis 10/2013 Claims series clauses Risk of coverage gaps in commercial insurance contracts 1. INTRODUCTION Commercial insurance contracts regularly contain claims
More informationYour Guide to Pursuing a Personal Injury Claim
Your Guide to Pursuing a Personal Injury Claim 2 Contents Introduction... 3 Important things that you must do... 3 In The Beginning... 4 Mitigating your loss... 4 Time limits... 4 Who can claim?... 4 Whose
More informationARBITRATION RULES OF THE COURT OF ARBITRATION AT THE POLISH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
ARBITRATION RULES OF THE COURT OF ARBITRATION AT THE POLISH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Chapter I Introductory provisions 1 Court of Arbitration 1. The Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce (the
More informationMOTOR INSURER S BUREAU OF IRELAND
MOTOR INSURER S BUREAU OF IRELAND COMPENSATION OF UNINSURED ROAD ACCIDENT VICTIMS Agreement dated 29th January 2009 between the Minister for Transport and the Motor Insurers Bureau of Ireland (MIBI) AGREEMENT
More informationArticle 2. Offers and quotations
1 Article 1. General 1. These terms and conditions apply to all offers, quotations and agreements between Smets Food Trading B.V., with registered offices in (6131 GR) Sittard, at Odasingel 473, hereinafter
More informationLegal Watch: Personal Injury
Legal Watch: Personal Injury 2nd July 2014 Issue: 025 Part 36 As can be seen from the case of Supergroup Plc v Justenough Software Corp Inc [Lawtel 30/06/2014] Part 36 is still the subject of varying interpretations.
More informationRULES OFTHE COURT OF ARBITRATION IN MATTERS CONCERNING INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES AT THE POLISH CHAMBER OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
RULES OFTHE COURT OF ARBITRATION IN MATTERS CONCERNING INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES AT THE POLISH CHAMBER OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS The following provisions constitute the Rules Court of
More informationBERMUDA WORKMEN S COMPENSATION RULES OF COURT 1965 SR&O 14 / 1966
QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA WORKMEN S COMPENSATION RULES OF COURT 1965 SR&O 14 / 1966 [made under section 41 of the Workmen s Compensation Act 1965 brought into operation on 2 August 1965] TABLE OF
More informationInspections and Access to Evidence in
Inspections and Access to Evidence in Patent Litigation 10 th Annual Conference on Intellectual Property Law & Policy at Fordham IP Law Institute April, 12 th 2012, New York by Dr. Klaus Grabinski Judge
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 99,491. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellant, JILL POWELL, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 99,491 KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellant, v. JILL POWELL, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Under the Kansas Act for Judicial Review and Civil Enforcement
More informationThis response is prepared on behalf of the Motor Accident Solicitors Society (MASS).
Introduction This response is prepared on behalf of the Motor Accident Solicitors Society (MASS). MASS is a Society of solicitors acting for the victims of motor accidents, including those involving Personal
More informationMedical Negligence. A client s guide. head and shoulders above the rest in terms of skills, experience and quality. The Legal 500
www.personalinjury.ffw.com Freephone 0800 358 3848 www.personalinjury.ffw.com Freephone 0800 358 3848 Medical Negligence A client s guide head and shoulders above the rest in terms of skills, experience
More informationISSUES PAPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND JURISDICTIONAL LIMIT IN SMALL CLAIMS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE ISSUES PAPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND JURISDICTIONAL LIMIT IN SMALL CLAIMS June 2013 Legal Policy Division Department of the Attorney-General and Justice
More informationLAW OF DAMAGES AND REMEDIES. DIFC LAW No. 7 of 2005
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LAW OF DAMAGES AND REMEDIES DIFC LAW No. 7 of 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationGENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF: Europe Retail Packing BV ABC Westland 315 2685 DD Poeldijk hereinafter to be referred to as: ERP Article 1 Definitions 1. In the present general terms and conditions, the
More informationInquiry Concerning A Florida Lawyer
Inquiry Concerning A Florida Lawyer This pamphlet provides general information relating to the purpose and procedures of the Florida lawyer discipline system. It should be read carefully and completely
More informationAct on Compensation for Crime Damage
NB: Unofficial translation Ministry of Justice Act on Compensation for Crime Damage (935/1973) General provisions Section 1 (63/1984) (1) Compensation shall be paid from State funds for injury or damage
More informationCASE TRACK LIMITS AND THE CLAIMS PROCESS FOR PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS
CASE TRACK LIMITS AND THE CLAIMS PROCESS FOR PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS A consultation paper produced by the Department for Constitutional Affairs RESPONSE BY THE LAW SOCIETY OF ENGLAND AND WALES July 2007
More informationGBR 92 GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES
GBR 92 GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES Revised in 2007 General Conditions for Consulting Services, GBR 92 Introduction These General Conditions for Consulting Services (GBR 92) have been prepared
More informationShort Form CFA based on "APIL/PIBA 9" for personal injuries and clinical negligence claims from 1.10.2013
LAMB CHAMBERS SHORT FORM CFA for use BETWEEN SOLICITORS AND COUNSEL on or after 1 October 2013 in personal injuries and clinical negligence claims (This agreement is not suitable for claims for diffuse
More informationPatents in Europe 2013/2014
In association with Unitary patent and Unified Patent Court: the proposed framework Rainer K Kuhnen Patents in Europe 2013/2014 Helping business compete in the global economy Unitary patent and Unified
More informationDRV Accountants & Adviseurs General terms and conditions Corporate Finance Versie 01-03-12 1
Filed with the Rotterdam Chamber of Commerce in Rotterdam on 26 March 2009 under number 24117094. Internet: www.drvcf.nl Offices in: Rotterdam Hoofdweg 52 P.O. Box 8560-3009 AN Rotterdam, Netherlands Telephone:
More informationGermany. Introduction
Germany Germany Introduction The labor law of the Federal Republic of Germany covers all legal rules concerning the relationship between employers and employees and their respective organizations. Traditionally,
More information2. Claimant: every natural person, as stated by the client, making a claim.
General terms and conditions 2015.1 Article 1: Definitions 1. Claim: claim from a claimant on the basis of Regulation 261/2004, possibly in combination with a claim based on the Convention for the Unification
More informationPAPER REFERENCE: IPLC1 MARK AWARDED: 36
PAPER REFERENCE: IPLC1 MARK AWARDED: 36 Question 1 This is the sentence or two which summarises why the case will succeed. It will distil the strongest evidence supporting a fact which satisfies the relevant
More informationHickman v Lapthorn [2006] ADR.L.R. 01/17
JUDGMENT : The Hon. Mr. Justice Jack : QBD. 17 th January 2006 1. This was a claim against solicitors and counsel for negligence in advising the claimant to settle at too low a value his claim arising
More informationAlternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Procedures
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Procedures The background Traditional dispute resolution procedures Private Negotiation 1. A lost skill, negotiation is a process of the parties themselves or via skilled
More informationDEBT RECOVERY IN BELGIUM Law Firm Van Dievoet, Jegers, Van der Mosen & Partners
Error!Marcador no definido.introduction The implementation of Directive 2000/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of June 29, 2000 into Belgian law The European directive had to be implemented
More informationEX306. The small claims track in the civil courts. About this leaflet. If your dispute has gone to court. Important information about this leaflet
EX306 The small claims track in the civil courts If your dispute has gone to court About this leaflet This leaflet is for people involved in a dispute that has gone to court and the claim has been allocated
More informationATTORNEY GENERAL S GUIDELINES ON PLEA DISCUSSIONS IN CASES OF SERIOUS OR COMPLEX FRAUD
ATTORNEY GENERAL S GUIDELINES ON PLEA DISCUSSIONS IN CASES OF SERIOUS OR COMPLEX FRAUD A FOREWORD A1. These Guidelines set out a process by which a prosecutor may discuss an allegation of serious or complex
More informationNOTE - This document is provided for guidance only and does not purport to be a legal interpretation. PERSONAL INSOLVENCY ACT 2012
Background to and purpose of the Act PERSONAL INSOLVENCY ACT 2012 EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM The Act provides for the reform of personal insolvency law and will introduce the following new non-judicial debt
More informationDispute Resolution Bringing A Small Claim
Dispute Resolution Bringing A Small Claim Kirwans is one of the North West s most forward thinking law firms. As an allservicing firm, our success has been built upon delivering expert knowledge and expertise
More informationGeneral Terms and Conditions for Turbines and Steel Water Plants
Date: a/14.12.04 Page 1 of 7 I. Quote 1. The documents belonging to the quote, such as figures, drawings, declarations of weight and dimensions shall only be decisive to an approximate extent, unless these
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION
NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION If you were injured or provided treatment for an injury and filed a claim under your Allstate Med Pay coverage, and were compensated in an amount
More informationPreparatory Committee for the Unified Patent Court. Consultation Document. Rules on Court fees and recoverable costs. I. Draft Proposal for
Preparatory Committee for the Unified Patent Court Final Consultation Document Rules on Court fees and recoverable costs I. Draft Proposal for A an amendment of Rule 370 of the Rules of Procedure Alternative
More informationPLEASE NOTE: THIS POLICY WILL END EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 10, 2013 AND WILL BE REPLACED BY THE INTERACTIVE RESOLUTION POLICY ON NOVEMBER 11, 2013.
PLEASE NOTE: THIS POLICY WILL END EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 10, 2013 AND WILL BE REPLACED BY THE INTERACTIVE RESOLUTION POLICY ON NOVEMBER 11, 2013. TOYOTA ASSOCIATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION ( T-ADR ): Summary Description
More information