A clean energy solution from cradle to grave



Similar documents
Legrand's environmental commitments

PRODUCT - SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS (PSR) Wood particleboards PSR 2003:8. The Swedish Environmental management Council Version 1.

Legrand's environmental commitments

A macro-economic viewpoint. What is the real cost of offshore wind? siemens.com / wind

siemens.com/mobility Metro Oslo Environmental Product Declaration according to ISO 14021

Birmingham City University / Students Union Aspects and Impacts Register. Waste. Impacts description

Environmental Product Declaration

The BOMBARDIER* REGINA*

HUGO BOSS ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENT. Our claim. Our approach

Category 5: Waste Generated in Operations

12.5: Generating Current Electricity pg. 518

White Paper Life Cycle Assessment and Product Carbon Footprint

Conclusions and Summary Report Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Highway Guard Rail Posts

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2012 SCORING GUIDELINES

This fact sheet provides an overview of options for managing solid

Environmental Performance Data Calculation Standards

LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT ON COTTON AND VISCOSE FIBRES FOR TEXTILE PRODUCTION

Carbon Footprint of a Dell Latitude E6540

Climate Change and Waste The Missing Link December 2010 Written by Jacob Gregory

Product Environmental Profile Step Down Transformers

An environmental comparison of paper and plastic labels. Chris Edwards & Gary Parker Intertek Expert Services

Paroc Insulation, product group with density <70 kg/m³ Product

State of the art sustainability marketing tools

Communicating Your Commitment: Your Guide to Clean Energy Messaging

LCA approaches for quantifying the environmental impact of plastics in the marine environment

Zinkbolt. ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCT DECLARATION in accordance with ISO 14025, ISO and EN Owner of the declaration:

Generating Current Electricity: Complete the following summary table for each way that electrical energy is generated. Pros:

SAMI Microstar (SAMI MM, MD, MS)

The new Audi TT Coupé. Life Cycle Assessment

NORDEX USA, INC. GREAT LAKES SYMPOSIUM

Green Energy in Europe - Potentials and Prospects

Sustainable Plastics with Reduced Carbon Footprint & Reduced Waste

Siemens D3 platform 3.0-MW, 3.2-MW, 3.3-MW, and 3.4-MW direct drive turbines. Reduced complexity, increased profitability. siemens.

Do-Now. 1.) Get out notebook.

The External and Social Costs of Energy Technologies

Comparing the Carbon Footprints of 11G and 12G Rack Servers from Dell

THE ACCOR GROUP S ENVIRONMENTAL FOOTPRINT: AN APPLICATION OF LIFE-CYLE APPROACH TO ASSESS AND MONITOR AN ORGANIZATION ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE

BES 6001 Issue 3 Guidance Document

Printed circuit board [EDP (0)]

Calculating Greenhouse Gas Emissions

6.3 Structured identification of business improvement opportunities using Life Cycle Assessment: A case study in the gas turbine industry

TABLET DETERGENTS Towards A More Sustainable Future

A Green Idea. Reclaiming Urban Wood Waste And Urban Forest Debris. For Fuel/Combustion & Renewable Energy

Waste a source of energy. Regional Solid Waste Management Plan Review: Engaging solutions for tomorrow. Incineration. Incineration

Delivering the UK s renewable heat objectives through wood fuel

A case study on multi-impact life cycle assessment of coffee alternatives

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of solar cooling systems

ENVIRONMENTAL Product Declaration as per ISO and EN Akçansa Çimento Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. Portland Cement CEM I 42.

LIFE-CYCLE IMPACTS AND COSTS OF MANGANESE LOSSES AND RECOVERY DURING FERROMANGANESE PRODUCTION

COMPARATIVE PRODUCT LIFECYCLE ASSESSMENT NIKE, Inc. Product Comparisons

Sustainable Manufacturing Seminar. Designing to Sustain the Economy, Environment and Society. Sustainable Product Standards (case-study)

Life Cycle Assessment and Forest Products: A White Paper

2012 Guidelines to Defra / DECC's GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting

6 CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES

Renewable Choice Energy

WIND AND SOLAR ENERGY DEVELOPMENTS IN IRAN

Operating Sustainable Facilities

Energise your waste! EU legislation pushes for a reliable alternative to landfilling for residual waste. 13 th September 2011, Birmingham

Fact sheet. Conversion factors. Energy and carbon conversions 2011 update

Carbon Sequestration Tool Background and User Guide

Archant London Environmental Awards

GYPSUM ASSOCIATION LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

WASTE INCINERATION IN CEMENT KILNS A local and global problem

HFCS, REFRIGERATION AND AIR-CONDITIONING: MINIMISING CLIMATE IMPACT, MAXIMISING SAFETY

S 0417 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Doing More with Less: Praxair Energy Efficiency Renewable Energy vs. Energy Efficiency: Comparing the Energy ROI. Version 2 updated May 2015

BASF Scope 3 GHG Inventory Report

How To Understand The Environmental Impacts Of A Plastic Bottle

GHG Accounting Guidance Note Manufacture of Renewable Energy Climate Related Products

Estimated emissions and CO2 savings deriving from adoption of in-place recycling techniques for road pavements

Harvesting energy with fertilizers

Siemens Wind Turbine SWT The new productivity benchmark.

Casper Wind Power Project Using Our Land Wisely

Screening Study of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of the Electric Kettle with SimaPro Software***

Glasopor (Cellular glass aggregate) Product

CEFC financing first for major Western Australian waste-to-gas project

Living & Working Managing Natural Resources and Waste

Audi e-gas-project. Life Cycle Assessment

Environmental Product Declaration. Registration number: S-P Rev. 0 11/06/03. Tmax T1. Low voltage circuit breaker.

OP 9: Clean and Renewable Energy

Life Cycle Assessment of Three Water Scenarios: Importation, Reclamation, and Desalination

Module 7 Forms of energy generation

Residential & Commercial Sectors Overview CLIMATE

SEATTLE STEAM COMPANY FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Greening the Supply Chain: A Way towards a New Way

CARBON ASSESSMENT TICKETING DELIVERY SYSTEMS

ESBI Company Profile. ESB International. Bringing Energy Innovation to the World...

UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE. Renewable Energy A Crucial Role in the Future Energy Mix

Life Cycle Inventory Packaging Options for Shipping Soft Goods in E-Commerce and Catalog Sales

Case Study 5 Use of Wind Turbine Technology

How To Understand The Benefits Of An Industrial Symbiosis

How To Do A Complete Life Cycle Analysis Of Packaging

BASIS cement ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCT DECLARATION. Aalborg Portland A/S ISO ISO EN The Norwegian EPD Foundation

Thermal & Biogas Production In Egypt. By Prof. Dr. Ahmed Abd El-Ati Ahmed Egypt - GBEP Focal Point

TOSCA. How companies work to realize sustainability goals

Product Environmental Assessment Activities in Taiwan

How to Earn the LEED Green Power Credit

Transcription:

Environmental Product Declaration A clean energy solution from cradle to grave Offshore wind power plant employing SWT-6.0-154 siemens.com / wind

2

Assessing the performance of a wind power plant The environmental impact of wind power The world today faces the challenge of meeting growing demand for energy while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. One solution is to increase the contribution of renewable energy systems such as wind, sun, or biomass to the electricity mix. Siemens Wind Power is pioneering this approach by offering an extensive wind turbine portfolio that includes the SWT-6.0-154 direct drive turbine. Siemens has performed a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of an offshore wind power plant employing SWT-6.0-154. The LCA evaluated the inputs, outputs, and potential environmental impacts that occur throughout the wind power plant lifecycle. It encompasses raw material extraction, materials processing, manufacturing, installation, operation and maintenance, and dismantling and end-of-life. The results are presented in this Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) in order to communicate the impacts of our wind power plant to our stakeholders. All results are verified by internal reviews. The international ISO 14021 standard (Environmental labels and declarations Self-declared environmental claims Type II) is the basis for this EPD. The data presented has been derived from a full-scale LCA in accordance with ISO 14040. 3

Designed to deliver clean energy Offshore wind power plant Each wind power plant has specific site constraints that influence the choice of turbine, tower height, foundation size, and infrastructure. This EPD is based on a full-scale LCA of an average European offshore wind power plant with 80 SWT-6.0-154 turbines installed. It includes wind turbine components such as a nacelle, rotor, and tower, as well as the foundation, cables to grid, and substation. The functional unit for this LCA is defined as 1 kwh of electricity delivered to the grid. The identified average wind speed is relative to the turbine IEC classification. Class I: 10 m/s for SWT-6.0-154. Product and system description, including main components Product and system description Turbine Main characteristics SWT-6.0-154 Number of turbines in wind power plant 80 Expected lifetime Expected average wind speed Distance to shore/shore to grid Annual energy production to grid per turbine (wake, availability and electrical losses of 15% substracted) Estimated energy production of the wind power plant in 25 years Nacelle Blades Tower Foundation Substations 25 years 10 m/s 50 km/22 km Approx. 26,500 MWh 53,000,000 MWh 6.0 MW DD (steel, iron, copper) 75 m (fiberglass, epoxy) 88 m (steel) 925 t (steel) 12,700 t (steel, concrete) 4

System boundaries for an offshore wind power plant Direct drive conversion Nacelle Blades Hub Tower Substation Substation Foundation Connecting cables 5

From cradle to grave Life cycle of a wind power plant The lifecycle has been devided into five main stages: Materials, Manufacturing of the main parts; Installation; Operation and Maintenance; Dismantling, Recycling, and Disposal at the end-of-life. Relevant transport activities and energy consumption were included in each life cycle stage. Manufacturing Installation Materials Life Cycle Stages Dismantling and end-of-life Operation and Maintenance 6

Materials We identified the types and quantities of materials and energy that had to be extracted and consumed to produce the turbine components and the elements needed to connect the wind power plant to the grid. Manufacturing We collected data from Siemens own production sites and from main suppliers. Consumption data for manufacturing as well as waste and subsequent treatment is based primarily on annual manufacturing data from European production sites. Transport of materials to the manufacturing site is included in the data. Installation Components, auxiliary resources, and workers are transported to the site during this stage. On-site installation includes preparing the site; erecting the turbines; and connecting the turbines to the grid. These installation activities result in the consumption of resources and production of waste. Associated data has been collected from actual on-site installations. Operation and Maintenance The structural design lifetime of a SWT-6.0-MW turbine is designed to last 25 years. We collected actual site data, including manpower, materials, and energy required for service and maintenance over the turbine s lifetime. Wake, availability, and electrical losses have been included in our assessment to define a realistic estimate of annual energy production delivered to the grid. Dismantling and end-of-life At the wind power plant s end-of-life the components will be disassembled and the materials transported and treated according to different waste management systems. For the turbine components, we assumed that recycling would apply to all recyclable materials; for example, metals. Recycling leads to the recovery of materials, which subsequently reduces primary material extraction. The rest of the materials are either thermally treated or disposed of in landfills. The end-of-life stage described here represents the current status of waste management options in Northern Europe. 7

Environmental footprint Low greenhouse gas emissions Greenhouse gases such as CO 2 and methane contribute to global warming. Electricity produced by wind turbines contributes significantly less to global warming than electricity produced by fossil fuels. During its lifetime, the wind power plant emits less than 1% of the CO 2 emitted per kwh by an average power plant using fossil fuels. 9.5 months energy payback time The energy payback time for the wind power plant in this assessment is less than 9.5 months. That is the length of time the wind power plant has to operate in order to produce as much energy as it will consume during its entire lifecycle. What is global warming? Global warming is an environmental impact caused by the increased concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Each of these gases radiates different amounts of heat, which can be quantified in units of carbon called carbon dioxideequivalent (CO 2 eq). (IPCC ref) During its entire lifecycle the wind power plant produces 33 times more energy than it consumes. 8

7g/kWh 865 g/kwh CO 2 emissions from the wind power plant versus global fossil power production (IEA World Energy Outlook, 2012) 45,000,000 t of CO 2 savings 1,286 km 2 forest area 35.86 km 80 turbines, 25 years 35.86 km During its estimated lifetime the wind power plant produces 53,000,000 MWh and saves 45,000,000 tonnes of CO 2, which is equal to the amount of CO 2 absorbed by a forest with an area of 1.286 km 2 over 25 years. 9

Every stage counts Contributions to global warming To examine how much each stage of the wind power plant s life cycle contributes to global warming, we assessed their specific CO 2 emissions (figure below). Percentage of global warming contribution from each life cycle stage (g CO 2 eq/kwh) 100 % 80 % 69 % 60 % 40 % 20 % 0 % 6 % 12 % 13 % -20 % -18 % -40 % Materials Manufacturing Installation Operation & Maintenance Dismantling & end-of-life The main contributor to global warming is the Material stage (69%) because of emissions during material extraction. There are almost no emissions during wind power plant operation, and there is even an offset to emissions at end-of-life because so many of the materials are recyclable. Component and material group contribution to CO 2 eq emission Each component and material group contributes to the total CO 2 eq emissions of the wind power plant. Among the components, the turbine s tower and foundation contribute more than 50%, followed by connecting cables, blades and nacelle. In terms of material group contribution, steel has the highest impact on global warming, followed by aluminum and epoxy. The category with other materials consists of minerals, various plastics, chemicals, and wood. 10

Global warming contribution of main components in the wind power plant (CO 2 eq) Substations (3%) Hub (5%) Nacelle (11%) Blades (11%) Foundation (39%) Connecting Cables (14%) Tower (17%) Global warming contribution per material group in the wind power plant (CO 2 eq) Other materials (3%) Copper (2%) Fiberglass (3%) Cast Iron (4%) Polyurethane (6%) Epoxy (8%) Steel (65%) Aluminum (9%) 11

Taking a holistic view Assessing additional impact categories Environmental sustainability also concerns problems other than climate change; for example, chemical pollution and resource depletion. Electricity produced by a wind power plant can be assessed for different environmental impact categories. Such an assessment shows that focusing solely on reducing the greenhouse gas emissions raises the risk of increasing other environmental impacts. In this EPD we have chosen to present six different categories that are relevant to infrastructure projects. The resource- and toxicity-related impacts were assessed using Impact 2002+v2.1 and USEtox v1.01. Definitions of most relevant environmental impact categories Global warming: An environmental impact caused by the increased concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Mineral extraction: The removal of minerals from the environment, which decreases their availability. Land occupation: The ecological damage to biodiversity resulting from land use. The damage is based on empirical observations of the number of plant and animal species affected per area type. Ecotoxicity: The toxic effects of natural or synthetic pollutants on flora and fauna. Human toxicity: The degree to which substances are toxic to humans. 12

Contribution of each Life Cycle Stage to the most relevant impact categories Global warming (kg CO 2 eq) Mineral extraction (MJ surplus) Land occupation (m2org.arable) Ecotoxicity (CTUe) Human toxicity, noncancer (CTUh) Human toxicity, cancer (CTUh) -100 % -50 % 0 % 50 % 100 % Materials Manufacturing Installation Operation Dismantling & end-of-life Other environmental impacts Planning a new wind power plant includes assessing the environmental impact of the installation and operation phases to minimize negative impacts. Often these assessments focus on birds, marine wildlife and visual impacts. How a wind power plant impacts its surroundings varies depending on its location and is not included in our LCA study. 13

End-of-life is not really the end Recycling turbine materials When wind turbines are dismantled, it is typically not because they have reached end-of-life but because they are replaced with larger turbines. Consequently, most dismantled turbines are refurbished and sold for installation elsewhere. When disposing of wind turbines, recycling is the preferred solution. This not only prevents the materials from being sent to landfills, but also reduces the need for extracting of primary materials. Options for recycling or disposal The metals in the wind power plant components are to a great extent recycled at their end-of-life. The blades, which are made of epoxy and fiberglass, may be shredded and incinerated. The burning of epoxy generates energy, which can be recovered. The residues from fiberglass incineration can be used in other secondary applications e.g. for cement production. Magnets from the direct drive turbines can be demagnetized, remagnetized and reused or used for new magnet production. Increasing recyclability of the turbine components is high on our agenda and we continually participate in projects to support development of more recycling options. 14

Ready for the future Siemens Wind Power strives to continually improve wind turbine performance by including environmental requirements in our design phase. We focus on increasing the annual energy output of the turbines and improving the material efficiency of their components. Our improvement projects also focus on optimizing processes during manufacturing, installation, operation and maintenance, and dismantling and end-of-life. All these initiatives will contribute to even lower CO 2 eq per kwh of electricity delivered to the grid. 15

Siemens AG Wind Power Lindenplatz 2 20099 Hamburg, Germany siemens.com/wind For more information, please contact our Customer Support Center. Phone: +49 180 524 70 00 Fax: +49 180 524 24 71 (Charges depending on provider) E-mail: support.energy@siemens.com Wind Power Order No. E50001-D310-T209-X-7600 RS 15_01_131 Printed on elementary chlorine-free bleached paper. All rights reserved. Trademarks mentioned in this document are the property of Siemens AG, its affiliates, or their respective owners. Subject to change without prior notice. The information in this document contains general descriptions of the technical options available, which may not apply in all cases. The required technical options should therefore be specified in the contract.