SELF-PAY COLLECTIONS BEST PRACTICES



Similar documents
Revenue Cycle Management

Purpose Statement Outlines purpose of and guidelines for receiving charity care or financial assistance at Valley Children s Hospital.

Preventative Care for Hospitals Mitigating Risk of Revenue Loss from ACA

Patient Finance Services Policy

The Joint Commission Page 1 of 6

SUBJECT: CHARITY AND UNCOMPENSATED CARE 1 of 13 DEPARTMENT: BUSINESS OFFICE REVISED: 10/2012

Financial Assistance Program AKA Charity Care/Uncompensated Care Program

Empowering healthcare organizations with data, analytics and insight

USC NORRIS CANCER HOSPITAL KECK HOSPITAL OF USC OPERATING POLICIES

5 KPIs That Require Revenue Cycle Managers' Attention. Devendra Saharia FEATURE STORY. healthcare financial management association

University Healthcare Administrative Policy

HFMA MAP Keys Patient Access Measure:

Administrative Hospital-wide Policy and Procedure

4C s Clinic Billing and Collection Policy

Self-Pay Collection Strategies in a New Era of Healthcare. How data analytics improves collections under Obamacare

Original Date. Policy #: OP Implemented: 2/1/10 Policy & Procedure Manual Effective Date: 10/1/14 Supersedes Policy Dated: 2/1/10.

CHAPTER 17 CREDIT AND COLLECTION

Policy: Charity Care Application Policy # 4.70 Department: Patient Access Policy Manual: USMD Hospital Revenue Cycle Manual Effective date:

POLICY. Title: Financial Assistance (Charity Care/Uncompensated Care) Approver: Kootenai Health Board Date: 09/29/2014

Phoenix Children's Hospital

California Hospital Billing and Collection Practices Voluntary Principles and Guidelines for Assisting Low-Income Uninsured Patients

Residency Status Not Required Residency status is not a consideration for eligibility in WFH s Community Care Program.

Granville Health System

EMDEON PATIENT ACCESS SOLUTIONS AND SERVICES

I. POLICY: II. PURPOSE:

Patient Care Financial Assistance

To establish reasonable, interest-free payment mechanisms based on the patient s ability to make payments.

Understanding Revenue Cycle Strategy How to Optimize Process and Performance

METHOD TO THE MADNESS

Top Ten Questions. Time and Energy. Robin Bradbury


Millcreek Community Hospital Erie, Pennsylvania. Hospital Policy

Patient Financial Policy

Provider Solutions. Sutherland Healthcare Solutions

Provider Solutions. Sutherland Healthcare Solutions

EAST TEXAS MEDICAL CENTER REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM CHARITY CARE & UNINSURED PATIENT POLICY

Revenue Cycle Management Rod Garrison

Successfully Implementing a Revenue Cycle Self-Pay Solution by Marty Callahan

healthcare services, provided that a member, in good standing, of SJMH s medical staff determines the need for such medical care treatment.

DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE PATIENT CARE AND ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY MANUAL PATIENT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE POLICY

RAPIDES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER POLICY: DISCOUNT CHARITY POLICY POLICY #25 PAGES 1-8

CHARITY CARE AND FINANCIAL AID GUIDELINES FOR PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITALS

Approved By: President/CEO June 2014 Signature Title Date

Vexical s Solution to the Patient Responsibility Conundrum

TransUnion Healthcare Solutions Overview

- Includes eligibility criteria for Financial Assistance fully or partially discounted care.

PORTER HOSPITAL, INC.

Business Office BO:14 10f8 06/13. Section: Policy No: Page: Effective: Revision: POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL HENDRICKS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ASSOCIA non

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURE. Objective

Financial Assistance Program Policy

Revenue Cycle Objectives Challenges Management Goals and Expected Benefits Sample Metrics Opportunities Summary Solution Steps

Best Practices in Revenue Cycle Management

Scripps Health Financial Assistance Policy

MANUAL: TCH POLICY NO: GA SECTION: General and Administrative PROC. NO: GA TITLE: FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE/

Revenue Cycle Management

ON PATIENT PAYMENTS. This Web version may be reproduced for individual use.

Financial Assistance Policy for Healthcare Services

What is Healthcare Reform? Get a view of the future health care system in the US; learn. success factors for healthcare administrators?

University of Pennsylvania Health System Health Services Policy and Procedure. Effective: 3/1/15 Page: 1 of 11

Policy. Category: REVENUE CYCLE Effective Date: See footer. Description. Financial Assistance Policy. Policy

11 Tips for Improving Return on Healthcare Receivables

Document Owner: Mary Ellen George Date Created: 08/27/2014 Approver(s): George, Mary Ellen Date Approved: 09/09/2014

Patient Assistance (Charity Care) Program 2015

Effective: October 1, 1991 Revised: October 31, 2012

POLICY AND PROCEDURE POLICY NUMBER: CHS-RMC-03 POLICY LEVEL: CHS

Fundamental Guide to Understanding Healthcare Payments

6 Critical Impact Factors of Health Reform on Revenue Cycle Management Pyramid Healthcare Solutions Thought Leadership Series

Current Status: Active PolicyStat ID: Charity Care

33rd Annual J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference

Certified Healthcare Financial Professional

Stanly Regional Medical Center. Billing and Collections Policy

BILLING AND COLLECTION LAWSUITS: WHAT HOSPITALS NEED TO KNOW AND PREPARE FOR

WHITE COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER

Conifer Health Solutions Tenet Investor Webinar

201% through 225% of FPG. 226% through 250% of FPG. 75% Adjustment. 50% Adjustment

II. Definitions: For the purpose of this policy, the terms below are defined as follows:

Transcription:

WHITE PAPER SELF-PAY COLLECTIONS BEST PRACTICES Guidelines for increasing compensated care from patients who can pay.

INTRODUCTION The American Hospital Association reported that in 2012, U.S. hospitals provided $45.9 billion in uncompensated care. This represented approximately 6% of annual hospital expenses and was nearly $5 billion more than 2011. Since 2006, uncompensated care has continued to increase by approximately 8% annually. (See Figure 1) Even the best-performing hospitals admit that there is much room for improvement in managing patient receivables associated with bad debt expense. It is estimated that 2% - 4% of additional patient collections could be captured with enhanced procedures. Even the best-performing hospitals admit there is room for improvement The effective resolution of the patient portion of bills associated with clinical services continues to challenge providers and patients. Just the mere mention of the word collections is often intimidating to both parties. The major challenge of collecting bad debt is that many providers have not embraced industry leading practices. Therefore, it seems that within industry there is room for improvement when it comes to implementing and following through with proven collection practices throughout the process. FIGURE 1 Uncompensated care Costs at registered community hospitals $45.9 10 years of data strongly suggests that uncompensated care costs are well on their way to $50 billion. $31.2 $34.0 $36.4 $39.1 $39.3 $41.1 SOURCE: Health forum, AHA ANNUAL SURVEY DATA 2012 $22.3 $24.9 $26.9 $26.9 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2

key elements of pursuit Two ways to minimize the sensitivity of pursuing patient balances The first is associated with hospitals and physicians providing a patient advocacy practice that insures that every patient who can afford to pay is provided an opportunity to reimburse the provider for his/her medical services. The second is a patient-friendly process which should provide that all financial communications be correct, clear, and concise. By embracing these state-of-the-art practices, providers are supporting the sensitivity of the patient s financial communication. Each practice should be well thought out and, more importantly, effectively executed and communicated. Patient advocacy An effective patient advocacy program employs industry leading practices: Same-Day Scheduling: Patients desire prompt access to clinical care. Online Registration: Completion of necessary administrative paperwork prior to arrival allows for a simple check-in process upon arrival for care. Kiosks: For those technically savvy, a certain population desires to register using an electronic device versus human interaction. Financial Counseling: Educating patients on their financial options is an optimal patient friendly process. Medicaid Eligibility Screening: Assisting patients with obtaining insurance versus navigating through the red tape. Disability Support Programs: Assisting patients in need with the state and federal bureaucratic processes differentiates providers who leave the patient to navigate on their own. Provide COBRA Compensation: Patients who have recently become unemployed may elect not to have services because of the COBRA premium. Providers who cover the cost are more patientfriendly. Medical Loan Programs: Offering patients banking loan Give patients the opportunity to pay for their care options are a less expensive alternative than the industry credit card option. Online Patient Portal: Many patients prefer to review statements, understand provider policy and procedure, and make payments to their debt online versus the typical manual process. Credit and Debit Card Acceptance: Accepting industry credit cards is an optimal option to patients versus a cash-based system. Payment Plans: Accepting regular, reasonable payments on a standard frequency is known to be patientfriendly. Charity: Providing community benefit based on federal poverty guidelines for those that cannot afford to pay is optimal. E-statements: Patients often prefer an electronic version of their financial billing statement versus a paper statement. Computer-Assisted Coding: Using technology to code industry procedures and diagnoses reduces cost and aids in a more timely patient billing process. Coding Documentation Improvement Program: Enhancing clinical documentation through technology and communication with providers enhances the patient s medical record and ultimately their clinical pathway. Denial Management: Providers who manage rejected services internally versus automatically engaging the patient create a much more patient-friendly service. Online Patient Education Programs: Allowing patients access to view provider policy and procedures, understanding billing and understanding administrative expectations and the process promotes a less stressful patient experience. 3

key elements of pursuit (cont d) Monthly On-site Patient Advocacy Training: Creating a face-to-face interaction with the public regarding the administrative and clinical processes minimizes the stress associated with receiving clinical care in the billing process. Collection Agency Associations: Engage thirdparty state regulated and patient friendly agencies to assist with collections. Debt Buyer Partnership: Finding the optimal agency to purchase uncompensated reimbursement using a strong patient advocacy process that mirrors the culture of the provider. A report developed by the Medical Debt Collection Task Force and assembled jointly by the Healthcare Financial Management Association (HFMA) and ACA International: The Association of Credit and Collections Professionals (ACA) verifies and supports the above recommendations. the Three c s of patient advocacy The second component to supporting patient advocacy is to ensure that all efforts are patient friendly. A three C s approach is paramount to success when it comes to patient-friendly financial communications: Billing statements should CORRECTLY reflect the financial elements of the episode of clinical care, contain CONCISE detail to effectively communicate the message, and CLEARLY express what actions are required by the patient in order to resolve any patient amount due. The need for healthcare services can unexpectedly arise at any time for anyone. Such unforeseen incidents only add more distress to the billing process. This is all the more reason why providers must ensure that they not only offer state-of-the-art payment options, but also employ a communication process that is correct, clear, and concise. bad debt should be limited to patients who can afford to pay but have elected not to Have you ever received a utility statement and didn t understand what you owed, or even worse, the balance didn t make sense? Billing systems that don t adhere to the three C s can leave patients feeling the same way. Whether one has insurance or not, medical debt impacts everyone receiving healthcare. The new healthcare reform created an industry assumption that self-pay would decline or maybe even be nonexistent. It is now very evident that Recommendations Some recommendations to honor patient rights and improve the medical billings process. Establishment of reasonable payment programs Regulation of charity care programs Offering of clear income discount policies and medical prices for lowincome patients Ensure collection agency support/partnerships are regulatory compliant and an extension to the provider s business office with a patientfriendly approach. this is not the case and, in fact, there are now higher out-of-pocket costs to the patient and a decline in collections of those balances to the provider. Fifteen percent of the U.S. population does not have health insurance and almost half of the U.S. population has outstanding medical bills that average from $8,000- $10,000 per person. And while it would seem that this is a big part of the bad debt problem, it is not where the great opportunity lies to reclaim compensation from self-pay patients. 4

It is reported that over 60% of medical debt complaints are made by patients that have insurance coverage. In addition, more than 70% of people who filed for bankruptcy because of medical bills had insurance coverage. The National Consumer Law Center has reported on the growing problem of abusive medical debt collection processes. They included everything from not offering charity care to denying future care for patients with an outstanding debt. Again, it is important to stress that offering the patient population various means to pay their bills is critical to patient satisfaction. At the end of the day, the definition of bad debt should be limited to patients who could afford to pay and were offered various alternatives to reimburse providers for the services provided, but who elected not to pay for services rendered. In that population, there is a percentage that clearly will not pay for something that they do not understand. The public has become more cynical of healthcare billing. Horror stories of charging for services not rendered or the $20 aspirin have created a climate of distrust. All the more reason for the three C s of financial communications in healthcare. The recently proposed regulations under Section 501(r) of the Internal Revenue Code are an attempt to standardize the process, but in many respects still fail to set specific mandates for providers. What the proposed regulations do spell out is that a patient should understand the process and know his/her options. Too often providers engage thirdparty collection firms that are not legally compliant in the industry and/or do not employ patient-friendly practices. It is well known in the healthcare industry that even though you may provide the best clinical care, a poor administrative and financial communication process will totally destroy the brand and reputation of the healthcare provider. Use of a third-party collection firm is a best practice if and only if you have a premium partner. The Fourth C in Effective Collections Providers who offer various options to their patients and communicate well with the public are most likely to survive the wave of the future with patient consumerism. The leading practices to support Patient Advocacy denoted in this article and the three C s of patient financial communications are crucial to the success of collecting patient amounts due. The fourth and final C is Capio Partners. We meet industry regulatory requirements, are a patient advocate and friendly partner who can help you improve your bottom line. We invite you to include Capio Partners as part of your self-pay collections strategy. Or if you d like to test the waters and see if we can work together to maximize your collection efforts, while enhancing patient satisfaction and compliance, please contact: Lyman Sornberger Chief healthcare strategy officer CAPIO PARTNERS 216-337-4472 lyman.sornberger@capiopartners.com Learn more about Capio s patient-centered approach on our online video page at: j.mp/capvidsv 5