Human Health Risk Assessment

Similar documents
WHAT IS RISK? Definition: probability of harm or loss Risk = Hazard x Exposure Risk can be voluntary or involuntary Interpretation of risk differs for

Risk-Based Decision Making for Site Cleanup

Module Three. Risk Assessment

About Pure Earth and the Toxic Site Identification Program

9.1 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT

Alternate Concentration Limits/Groundwater Cleanup Levels. Title slide

2. determining that land is not contaminated land and is suitable for any use, and hence can be removed from the CLR or EMR, as relevant.

Chapter 22: Overview of Ecological Risk Assessment

Description Purpose Health Education. Health Assessment. Outcomes of the program Partners Contact Information

Inorganic mercury/ elemental mercury General information

Guide to the Remediation Report & Fee Submission Form

Focus on Developing Surface Water Cleanup Standards Under the Model Toxics Control Act

Summary of A Protocol for the Derivation of Environmental and Human Health Soil Quality Guidelines (CCME 2006)

Department of Environmental Engineering

Division of Public Health Services Office of the Assistant Director Public Health Preparedness Services

Costs of air pollution from European industrial facilities an updated assessment

Part B Integrated Monitoring Design for Comprehensive Assessment and Identification of Impaired Waters Contents

ITALIAN GUIDELINES FOR THE APPLICATION OF RISK ASSESSMENT AT CONTAMINATED SITES

Inventory of Performance Monitoring Tools for Subsurface Monitoring of Radionuclide Contamination

USEPA Risk-Based Standards for Controlling Contaminated Sites Soil Screening Levels (SSLs) April 2, 2007 Aaron Yeow, USEPA

What are the causes of air Pollution

PRODUCT ID: LIDOCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND EPINEPHRINE INJECTION

Risk Assessment Based Environmental Management Systems for Petroleum Retail Stores

Asbestos. General information

Revealing the costs of air pollution from industrial facilities in Europe a summary for policymakers

STATE OF MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT CLEANUP STANDARDS FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER JUNE INTERIM FINAL GUIDANCE (UPDATE No. 2.

Aliphatic Alcohols Facts

In-situ Bioremediation of oily sediments and soil

DOCUMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR DETERMINATION Interim Final 2/5/99 RCRA Corrective Action Environmental Indicator (EI) RCRIS code (CA725)

New environmental liabilities for EU companies

Focus on Developing Ground Water Cleanup Standards Under the Model Toxics Control Act

1. PUBLIC HEALTH STATEMENT

STATEMENT OF BASIS HYPERGOL SUPPORT BUILDING SWMU 65 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION KENNEDY SPACE CENTER BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

Geoscience for Population Health Risk Assessment

Letter Health Consultation

Occupational/Industrial Hygiene Knowledge and Competency Requirements

2,2,2 trifluoroethanol

LIQUID WASTE TREATMENT FACILITY MENDIS ROAD, HUDSON CREEK DRAFT GUIDELINES FOR A PUBLIC ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT

The Science of Chemical Safety Essential Toxicology - 4. Hazard and Risk. John Duffus & Howard Worth. IUPAC Educators Resource Material IUPAC

APPENDIX D RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY

Evaluation of Site-Specific Criteria for Determining Potability

GUIDELINES FOR THE REGISTRATION OF BIOLOGICAL PEST CONTROL AGENTS FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS

Extreme Events in the Atmosphere

SoCo: European Overview on soil degradation processes related to agriculture

Massachusetts Department of Public Health Bureau of Environmental Health 250 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02108

Chemical Safety Assessment

The Public Health Management of Chemical Incidents Case Study

Dental amalgams & alternative materials

Section 4. Toxicology

NON-CANCER HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT FROM EXPOSURE TO CYANIDE BY RESIDENT ADULTS FROM THE MINING OPERATIONS OF BOGOSO GOLD LIMITED IN GHANA

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Buffer solution ph 4 (phthalate), traceable to NIST, colored red

U.S. EPA s Models for Establishing Cleanup Levels in Soil, Water, Buildings and Streets at Superfund Sites

Proposed Terms of Reference for EIA studies

Product Safety Summary Sheet

New Cumberland Army Depot Formerly Used Defense Site (FUDS) Marsh Run Park Site Restoration Community Meeting

GPS Safety Summary. Substance Name: ETHOXYLATED TRIMETHYLOLPROPANE TRIACRYLATE

GPS Safety Summary. Cyclododeca-1,5,9-triene. Technical information. Substance name. Cyclododeca-1,5,9-triene CAS No

Exposure and Control of Ten High Priority MSHA Contaminants in Metal Mines. Presented by: Shannon E. Newton, MPH, CIH

Implementation of Dredging Risk Assessment Modeling Applications for Evaluation of the No-Action Scenario and Dredging Impacts

Material Safety Data Sheet ISO/DIS / 29 CFR / ANSI Z400.1

GPS Safety Summary DIPROPYLENE GLYCOL DIACRYLATE

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

OFF! CLIP-ON MOSQUITO REPELLENT

Defence College of Technical Training. Former RAF Lyneham Geo-Environmental Report Appendix D: Preliminary Qualitative Risk Assessment

Manag.

Report on the Need for New York to Refinance the Superfund

Rehabilitation and Remediation of POPs

US Safety Data Sheet GEAR OIL SAE 10W/30 GEAR OIL SAE 10W/30

Uncontrolled if Printed

FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT MASON COUNTY LANDFILL SUPERFUND SITE LUDINGTON, MICHIGAN FEBRUARY, 2001

REACH Understanding the Risk Assessment Process

Soil Cleanup Goals. Minnesota Department of Agriculture Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division. Guidance Document 19

A User s Guide for the Ambient Water Quality Guidelines for Cadmium

September 19, 1984 FOOD PRODUCTION AND DIRECTION GÉNÉRALE, SECTION INSPECTION BRANCH PRODUCTION ET INSPECTION PESTICIDES DES ALIMENTS TRADE MEMORANDUM

PRODUCT SAFETY DATA SHEET According to 91/155 EC 1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE SUBSTANCE / PREPARATION AND OF THE COMPANY / UNDERTAKING

DOW CORNING CORPORATION Material Safety Data Sheet

SENTERNOVEM TASKGROUP SOIL+

Cornell Waste Management Institute

ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT (EcoRA)

PATHWAYS DRAIN TREATMENT. Use only for the purpose on the product label.

Chapter 12: SPECIFIC TARGET ORGAN SYSTEMIC TOXICITY (TOST) FOLLOWING A SINGLE EXPOSURE

Material Safety Data Sheet

: MR MUSCLE Window & Glass Cleaner

January 2014: Jeanne Briskin of the U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

GPS Safety Summary HEXANE-1,6-DIOL DIACRYLATE

Health Consultation. COLLEGE GROVE RESIDENTIAL LEAD CONTAMINATION (a/k/a COLLEGE GROVE BATTERY CHIP SITE) COLLEGE GROVE, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE

SAFETY DATA SHEET ZANFEL VERSION 1.5.0

Origins and causes of river basin sediment degradation and available remediation and mitigation options. Feedback from the Riskbase workshop

WINDEX MULTI-SURFACE CLEANER - VINEGAR

WINDEX ORIGINAL GLASS CLEANER WITH AMMONIA-D

GPS Safety Summary. Dodecane-12-lactam

A Federal Approach to Contaminated Sites

Transcription:

Training on mercury management and remediation of contaminated sites Human Health Risk Assessment Mercury contaminated sites Almadén, Spain. 18-19 November 2015

Definition A Human health risk assessment is the process to estimate the nature and probability of adverse health effects in humans who may be exposed to chemicals in contaminated environmental media, now or in the future (EPA)

Main objectives to determine tolerable levels of contaminants in soil and groundwater that are protective of public health and ecosystems: Site Specific Target Level (SSTL) to provide a consistent methodology for appraising and recording public health risks at contaminated sites to establish the baseline risks and determine whether site remediation is required (Decision-making) to enable the comparison of potential health impacts of various remedial technologies.

Tiers of analysis TIER 1 TIER 2 TIER 3 Screening level: comparison of known site data with published risk-based guidance levels, not considering local conditions Site-specific risk assessment and the development of sitespecific target levels for comparison with site data Site-specific risk assessment in more detail which may include statistical methods, mathematical modelling and the collection of additional data (e.g. Local epidemiologic study )

European soils policies EU Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection, adopted in 2006 Some countries: National policies for the management of contaminated sites Specific legislation regulating investigation and clean-up of contaminated land Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the protection of soil and amending Directive 2004/35/EC (may of 2014)

European soils policies Environment International, 2009

Spanish approach Royal Decree 9/2005 Risk-based Generic Values of Reference (GVRs) for 60 priority pollutants Site-specific risk assessment Risk-based Corrective Action Law 22/2011

Four-Step Process DATA EVALUATION Hazard identification Review key research to identify any potential health problems that a chemical can cause Determine the amount, duration, and pattern of exposure to the chemical Exposure assessment Toxicity assessment Estimate how much of the chemical it would take to cause varying degrees of health effects that could lead to illnesses Assess the risk for the chemical to cause cancer or other illnesses in the general population Risk characterization RISK MANAGEMENT AND DECISION-MAKING

Planning and research Step 0: Planning and Scoping Process and Data Evaluation Developing a Conceptual Site Model (CSM): is a representation of the physical, chemical and biological processes that control the transport, migration and actual/potential impacts of contamination (in soil, air, ground water, surface water and/or sediments) to human and/or ecological receptors. Factors to be considered: the contaminants: concentration, distribution and media affected, on and off the site physical characteristics of the environment characteristics of the exposed population means by which exposure could occur

CSM- Source On-Site Primary Source Off-Site Vapour phase Secondary Source Free phase (LNAPL) Dissolved phase Free phase (DNAPL)

SCM- Transport On-Site Wind erosion and Atmospheric dispersion Stormwater Off-Site Leaching to groundwater (from soils) Volatilisation and Atmospheric dispersion Volatilisation and Enclosed aaccumulation Mobile free-liquid migration Groundwater transport

CSM-Receptors Industrial use On-Site Future use? Sensitive ecosystem Off-Site Residential use Receptors

Step 1: Hazard Identification Process of determining whether exposure to a stressor can cause an increase in the incidence of specific adverse health effects (e.g., cancer, birth defects). It is also whether the adverse health effect is likely to occur in humans. Types of health effects: Acute effects Chronic threshold effects (all kinds of chronic toxicity other than cancer) Chronic cancer effects Source of data: Statistically controlled clinical studies on humans and animals (more common) Epidemiological studies

Step 2: Exposure Assessment Estimation of the magnitude, frequency, extent and duration of exposures to contaminants The key elements of exposure assessment are: Analysis of contaminant releases (concentration) Identification of potential exposure pathways Estimation of exposure for each pathway Estimation of contaminant intake for each pathway Evaluate uncertainties

Exposure Pathway Flowchart SOURCE SOURCE AREA TRANSPORT MECHANISM EXPOSURE ROUTES RECEPTORS Above ground storage tank/piping Affected sub-surface soils Leaching & Groundwater Transport Groundwater Potable water use Commercial /Industrial workers Sources: Product storage Piping/Distribution Operations Waste Management Units Other Source Sources area: Surface soils Subsurface soils Dissolved groundwater plume NAPL Sediments Transport mechanism: Wind erosion & Atmospheric Dispersion Volatilization and enclosed space accumulation Leaching to groundwater transport Mobile NAPL migration Storm water/surface water transport Transport Exposure routes: Dermal contact Ingestion Inhalation of Particulate Inhalation of Vapours Potable water use (ingestion, cooking, showering, cleaning) Swimming Receptors Receptors: Residents Commercial or Industrial workers Construction workers Recreational users Relevant Ecological Receptors and Habitats

Step 3: Toxicity Assessment Defines toxicity and dose-response relationship for each contaminant of concern Literature-based research exercise. Sources of toxicity information (among others): World Health Organization sources IRIS (Integrated Risk Information Systems), USEPA Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) documents

Step 4 : Risk Characterization Information from the data collection, exposure and toxicity assessments is summarised and integrated. Three steps: Risk estimation Risk evaluation Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis

Step 4 : Risk Characterization Non-carcinogenic substances: Characterized by a threshold below which the body is able to cope with or recover from the exposure HI (Hazard Index)= HQ (Hazard Quotient) = Intake non-carcinogenic/ Reference Dose Factor HI >1 UNSAFE HI <1 SAFE Carcinogenic substances: There is no threshold and the effect of episodic doses accumulate. There is no zero risk if there is exposure at all IELCR = Intake carcinogenic x Slope Factor (SFo) of the Dose response curve IELCR = Individual Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk Acceptable threshold is 10-5 ( in Spain)

Mercury (Hg) Mercury exists in several forms: methylmercury and other organic compounds, elemental (metallic) mercury and inorganic mercury compounds.

Mercury (Hg) toxicity For exposed living organisms, the form of mercury affects: how available it is to cause effects within the body; how it moves around inside the body; how toxic it is; how it accumulates, is transformed and leaves the body; how it biomagnifies (builds up) along the food chain. There are important qualitative and quantitative differences in the toxicity of different species of Mercury (e.g. methylmercury and Hg 2+ ions). e.g. Cancer Risk (EPA): Elemental mercury: Group D, not classifiable as to human carcinogenicity Inorganic mercury: mercuric chloride, as a Group C, possible human carcinogen Methylmercury: Group C, possible human carcinogen

Mercury (Hg) main exposure assessment Environmental compartment Chemical forms Exposure pathways Tissue absorption Atmosphere Mercury Vapour Inhalation Pulmonary Atmosphere Mercury Metallic Dermic Skin Terrestrial food chain and water ingestion Inorganic Mercury Ingestion Gastrointestinal Aquatic food chain (fish) Organic Mercury/MeHg Ingestion Gastrointestinal

Software UMS System (Germany) Vlier-Humaan (Belgium) JAGG (Denmark) Arrikugest (Spain) ConSim (Great Britain) P20 RTW (Great Britain) CLEA (Great Britain) Risc-Human (The Netherlands) ROME (Italy) RBCA Tool Kit for Chemical Releases (USA): http://www.gsinet.com/en/software/rbca-tool-kit-for-chemical-releases-version-2-6e.html RISC (USA): http://www.groundwatersoftware.com/risc.htm

RBCA Tool Kit for Chemical Releases

RBCA Tool Kit for Chemical Releases

RBCA Tool Kit for Chemical Releases

RBCA Tool Kit for Chemical Releases

RBCA Tool Kit for Chemical Releases

RBCA Tool Kit for Chemical Releases

RBCA Tool Kit for Chemical Releases

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!!! Silvia de la Rosa López sdelarosa@emgrisa.es