LAMPIRAN. 1. Uji Heteroskedastisitas dengan metode White Heteroskedasticity Test

Similar documents
Forecasting the US Dollar / Euro Exchange rate Using ARMA Models

Chapter 6: Multivariate Cointegration Analysis

The relationship between stock market parameters and interbank lending market: an empirical evidence

Price volatility in the silver spot market: An empirical study using Garch applications

TIME SERIES ANALYSIS OF CHINA S EXTERNAL DEBT COMPONENTS, FOREIGN EXCHANGE RESERVES AND ECONOMIC GROWTH RATES. Hüseyin Çetin

Testing The Quantity Theory of Money in Greece: A Note

THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2014, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Homework Assignment #2

Performing Unit Root Tests in EViews. Unit Root Testing

The Impact of Privatization in Insurance Industry on Insurance Efficiency in Iran

Business cycles and natural gas prices

Air passenger departures forecast models A technical note

IS THERE A LONG-RUN RELATIONSHIP

Competition as an Effective Tool in Developing Social Marketing Programs: Driving Behavior Change through Online Activities

Time Series Analysis

Source engine marketing: A preliminary empirical analysis of web search data

What drove Irish Government bond yields during the crisis?

Is the Basis of the Stock Index Futures Markets Nonlinear?

Time Series Analysis

Toward Efficient Management of Working Capital: The case of the Palestinian Exchange

European Journal of Business and Management ISSN (Paper) ISSN (Online) Vol.5, No.30, 2013

Forecasting Using Eviews 2.0: An Overview

Business Cycles and Natural Gas Prices

COINTEGRATION AND CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP AMONG CRUDE PRICE, DOMESTIC GOLD PRICE AND FINANCIAL VARIABLES- AN EVIDENCE OF BSE AND NSE *

2. Linear regression with multiple regressors

TEMPORAL CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STOCK MARKET CAPITALIZATION, TRADE OPENNESS AND REAL GDP: EVIDENCE FROM THAILAND

Department of Economics

Gastvortrag: Solvency II, Asset Liability Management, and the European Bond Market Theory and Empirical Evidence

Vector Time Series Model Representations and Analysis with XploRe

Examining the Relationship between ETFS and Their Underlying Assets in Indian Capital Market

Advanced Forecasting Techniques and Models: ARIMA

THE IMPACT OF COMPANY INCOME TAX AND VALUE-ADDED TAX ON ECONOMIC GROWTH: EVIDENCE FROM NIGERIA

Intertemporal Effects of Online Advertising Channels on Customers

Unit Labor Costs and the Price Level

Please follow the directions once you locate the Stata software in your computer. Room 114 (Business Lab) has computers with Stata software

Relationship between Commodity Prices and Exchange Rate in Light of Global Financial Crisis: Evidence from Australia

3.1 Stationary Processes and Mean Reversion

THE EFFECTS OF BANKING CREDIT ON THE HOUSE PRICE

The Relationship between Life Insurance and Economic Growth: Evidence from India

Unit 31 A Hypothesis Test about Correlation and Slope in a Simple Linear Regression

Chapter 5: Bivariate Cointegration Analysis

THE IMPACT OF EXCHANGE RATE VOLATILITY ON BRAZILIAN MANUFACTURED EXPORTS

Education, Economic Growth & Poverty Rate in Nigeria: Any Nexus?

The VAR models discussed so fare are appropriate for modeling I(0) data, like asset returns or growth rates of macroeconomic time series.

SIMPLE LINEAR CORRELATION. r can range from -1 to 1, and is independent of units of measurement. Correlation can be done on two dependent variables.

Granger Causality between Government Revenues and Expenditures in Korea

MULTIPLE REGRESSION AND ISSUES IN REGRESSION ANALYSIS

IMPACT OF WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ON PROFITABILITY

(I)rationality of Investors on Croatian Stock Market Explaining the Impact of American Indices on Croatian Stock Market

Working Papers. Cointegration Based Trading Strategy For Soft Commodities Market. Piotr Arendarski Łukasz Postek. No. 2/2012 (68)

Chapter 4: Vector Autoregressive Models

Implied volatility transmissions between Thai and selected advanced stock markets

PITFALLS IN TIME SERIES ANALYSIS. Cliff Hurvich Stern School, NYU

SYSTEMS OF REGRESSION EQUATIONS

LONG TERM CAUSALITY OF GDP LED EXPORT (GLE) USING VECM MODEL WITH REFERENCE TO INDIA

Wooldridge, Introductory Econometrics, 3d ed. Chapter 12: Serial correlation and heteroskedasticity in time series regressions

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and

ENDOGENOUS GROWTH MODELS AND STOCK MARKET DEVELOPMENT: EVIDENCE FROM FOUR COUNTRIES

Oil price & stock market performance in Nigeria: An empirical analysis

1. What is the critical value for this 95% confidence interval? CV = z.025 = invnorm(0.025) = 1.96

Electricity Price Forecasting in the Spanish Market using Cointegration Techniques

Non-Stationary Time Series andunitroottests

The Orthogonal Response of Stock Returns to Dividend Yield and Price-to-Earnings Innovations

Weak-form Efficiency and Causality Tests in Chinese Stock Markets

Determinants of Stock Market Performance in Pakistan

Does Insurance Promote Economic Growth? Evidence from the UK

Financial Integration of Stock Markets in the Gulf: A Multivariate Cointegration Analysis

PARTNERSHIP IN SOCIAL MARKETING PROGRAMS. SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE COMPANIES AND NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS ENGAGEMENT IN SOLVING SOCIETY S PROBLEMS

Econometrics I: Econometric Methods

CHAPTER 13 SIMPLE LINEAR REGRESSION. Opening Example. Simple Regression. Linear Regression

Is the Forward Exchange Rate a Useful Indicator of the Future Exchange Rate?

August 2012 EXAMINATIONS Solution Part I

Predicting The Outcome Of NASCAR Races: The Role Of Driver Experience Mary Allender, University of Portland

MARKETING COMMUNICATION IN ONLINE SOCIAL PROGRAMS: OHANIAN MODEL OF SOURCE CREDIBILITY

The following postestimation commands for time series are available for regress:

Week TSX Index

TOURISM AS A LONG-RUN ECONOMIC GROWTH FACTOR: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION FOR GREECE USING CAUSALITY ANALYSIS. Nikolaos Dritsakis

EXPORT INSTABILITY, INVESTMENT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN ASIAN COUNTRIES: A TIME SERIES ANALYSIS

Stock Returns and Equity Premium Evidence Using Dividend Price Ratios and Dividend Yields in Malaysia

Turkey s Energy Demand

Regression Analysis: A Complete Example

On the Degree of Openness of an Open Economy Carlos Alfredo Rodriguez, Universidad del CEMA Buenos Aires, Argentina

Causes of Inflation in the Iranian Economy

Asian Economic and Financial Review THE EFFECT OF INTEREST RATE, INFLATION RATE, GDP, ON REAL ECONOMIC GROWTH RATE IN JORDAN. Abdul Aziz Farid Saymeh

Testing for Granger causality between stock prices and economic growth

Monitoring web traffic source effectiveness with Google Analytics An experiment with time series

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2015, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Midterm

The Long-Run Relation Between The Personal Savings Rate And Consumer Sentiment

The Influence of Crude Oil Price on Chinese Stock Market

This paper analyses public-debt management in Brazil, and considers

The Impact of Economic Globalization on Income Distribution: Empirical Evidence in China. Abstract

16 : Demand Forecasting

Some useful concepts in univariate time series analysis

STAFF WORKING PAPER. The Relationship between Sustainable Growth and the Riskfree Rate: Evidence from UK Government Gilts. Staff Working Paper 2012.

Introduction to General and Generalized Linear Models

Chapter 13 Introduction to Linear Regression and Correlation Analysis

Descriptive Statistics

Asian Economic and Financial Review PAIRS TRADING STRATEGY IN DHAKA STOCK EXCHANGE: IMPLEMENTATION AND PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS. Sharjil Muktafi Haque

Cointegration And Causality Analysis of Government Expenditure And Economic Growth In Nigeria

Cointegration and error correction

The Relationship Between Crude Oil and Natural Gas Prices

Transcription:

69 LAMPIRAN 1. Uji Heteroskedastisitas dengan metode White Heteroskedasticity Test White Heteroskedasticity Test: F-statistic 1.943511 Probability 0.140640 Obs*R-squared 13.04830 Probability 0.160433 Test Equation: Dependent Variable: RESID^2 Date: 06/13/09 Time: 22:30 Sample: 1986 2007 Included observations: 22 C 0.239802 0.329434 0.727919 0.4806 LOG(Y) -0.055690 0.058645-0.949620 0.3610 (LOG(Y))^2-0.000590 0.006008-0.098189 0.9234 (LOG(Y))*(LOG(P)) 0.004979 0.008064 0.617488 0.5485 (LOG(Y))*(LOG(RE)) 0.012592 0.025352 0.496684 0.6284 LOG(P) 0.050047 0.078681 0.636080 0.5367 (LOG(P))^2 0.009633 0.010661 0.903619 0.3840 (LOG(P))*(LOG(RE)) -0.060272 0.027306-2.207318 0.0475 LOG(RE) 0.015430 0.169807 0.090867 0.9291 (LOG(RE))^2 0.016351 0.017577 0.930250 0.3706 R-squared 0.593104 Mean dependent var 0.002484 Adjusted R-squared 0.287933 S.D. dependent var 0.002479 S.E. of regression 0.002091 Akaike info criterion -9.198949 Sum squared resid 5.25E-05 Schwarz criterion -8.703021 Log likelihood 111.1884 F-statistic 1.943511 Durbin-Watson stat 2.984411 Prob(F-statistic) 0.140640

70 2. Autokorelasi test dengan metode Breusch-Godfrey Serial Correlation LM Test Breusch-Godfrey Serial Correlation LM Test: F-statistic 3.349285 Probability 0.060950 Obs*R-squared 6.492415 Probability 0.038922 Test Equation: Dependent Variable: RESID Date: 06/13/09 Time: 22:37 Presample missing value lagged residuals set to zero. C -0.069539 0.223876-0.310614 0.7601 LOG(Y) 0.012653 0.037572 0.336776 0.7407 LOG(P) 0.000261 0.037936 0.006882 0.9946 LOG(RE) -0.030781 0.075746-0.406372 0.6899 RESID(-1) 0.446345 0.239620 1.862718 0.0810 RESID(-2) -0.510974 0.272995-1.871736 0.0796 R-squared 0.295110 Mean dependent var -1.29E-15 Adjusted R-squared 0.074832 S.D. dependent var 0.051017 S.E. of regression 0.049071 Akaike info criterion -2.964098 Sum squared resid 0.038527 Schwarz criterion -2.666541 Log likelihood 38.60507 F-statistic 1.339714 Durbin-Watson stat 2.189501 Prob(F-statistic) 0.297825

71 3. Deteksi autokorelasi setelah dilakukan perbaikan Autoregressive (AR) Breusch-Godfrey Serial Correlation LM Test: F-statistic 1.876661 Probability 0.189644 Obs*R-squared 4.439719 Probability 0.108624 Test Equation: Dependent Variable: RESID Date: 06/14/09 Time: 17:24 Presample missing value lagged residuals set to zero. C -0.035559 0.319558-0.111274 0.9130 LOG(Y) 0.035311 0.046853 0.753662 0.4635 LOG(P) 0.013297 0.051415 0.258620 0.7997 LOG(RE) -0.144382 0.157160-0.918694 0.3738 AR(1) -0.626231 0.809114-0.773972 0.4518 RESID(-1) 0.721576 0.776156 0.929679 0.3683 RESID(-2) -0.287013 0.388088-0.739557 0.4718 R-squared 0.211415 Mean dependent var -2.26E-10 Adjusted R-squared -0.126550 S.D. dependent var 0.047624 S.E. of regression 0.050547 Akaike info criterion -2.870614 Sum squared resid 0.035770 Schwarz criterion -2.522440 Log likelihood 37.14145 F-statistic 0.625554 Durbin-Watson stat 2.106937 Prob(F-statistic) 0.707638

72 4. Unit Root Test Root Test Variabel X Null Hypothesis: X has a unit root Exogenous: Constant, Linear Trend Lag Length: 0 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=4) t-statistic Prob.* Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -1.972989 0.5817 Test critical values: 1% level -4.467895 5% level -3.644963 10% level -3.261452 *MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values. Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation Dependent Variable: D(X) Date: 07/06/09 Time: 20:17 Sample (adjusted): 1987 2007 Included observations: 21 after adjustments X(-1) -0.151118 0.076594-1.972989 0.0641 C 754.0966 297.0888 2.538286 0.0206 @TREND(1986) 409.0295 155.6901 2.627204 0.0171 R-squared 0.571682 Mean dependent var 1984.576 Adjusted R-squared 0.524091 S.D. dependent var 944.6088 S.E. of regression 651.6493 Akaike info criterion 15.92845 Sum squared resid 7643643. Schwarz criterion 16.07767 Log likelihood -164.2488 F-statistic 12.01242 Durbin-Watson stat 1.598391 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000485

73 Root Test Variabel Y Null Hypothesis: Y has a unit root Exogenous: Constant, Linear Trend Lag Length: 4 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=4) t-statistic Prob.* Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -1.240687 0.8675 Test critical values: 1% level -4.616209 5% level -3.710482 10% level -3.297799 *MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values. Warning: Probabilities and critical values calculated for 20 observations and may not be accurate for a sample size of 17 Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation Dependent Variable: D(Y) Date: 07/06/09 Time: 20:18 Sample (adjusted): 1991 2007 Included observations: 17 after adjustments Y(-1) -0.477372 0.384764-1.240687 0.2430 D(Y(-1)) 0.206349 0.285719 0.722210 0.4867 D(Y(-2)) 0.078679 0.271319 0.289987 0.7777 D(Y(-3)) 0.208600 0.238499 0.874637 0.4023 D(Y(-4)) -1.256053 0.402741-3.118761 0.0109 C -1719016. 1147490. -1.498066 0.1650 @TREND(1986) 302224.2 149563.9 2.020703 0.0709 R-squared 0.750325 Mean dependent var 288323.5 Adjusted R-squared 0.600521 S.D. dependent var 1591574. S.E. of regression 1005944. Akaike info criterion 30.77365 Sum squared resid 1.01E+13 Schwarz criterion 31.11674 Log likelihood -254.5761 F-statistic 5.008689 Durbin-Watson stat 1.819899 Prob(F-statistic) 0.012804

74 Root Test Variabel P Null Hypothesis: P has a unit root Exogenous: Constant, Linear Trend Lag Length: 1 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=4) t-statistic Prob.* Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -2.425078 0.3570 Test critical values: 1% level -4.498307 5% level -3.658446 10% level -3.268973 *MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values. Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation Dependent Variable: D(P) Date: 07/06/09 Time: 20:18 Sample (adjusted): 1988 2007 Included observations: 20 after adjustments P(-1) -0.190838 0.078693-2.425078 0.0275 D(P(-1)) 0.702600 0.187392 3.749362 0.0018 C -3.405355 14.59647-0.233300 0.8185 @TREND(1986) 4.988699 2.222929 2.244201 0.0393 R-squared 0.574340 Mean dependent var 23.45500 Adjusted R-squared 0.494528 S.D. dependent var 39.90985 S.E. of regression 28.37452 Akaike info criterion 9.705716 Sum squared resid 12881.81 Schwarz criterion 9.904863 Log likelihood -93.05716 F-statistic 7.196221 Durbin-Watson stat 1.528213 Prob(F-statistic) 0.002835

75 Root Test Variabel RE Null Hypothesis: RE has a unit root Exogenous: Constant, Linear Trend Lag Length: 2 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=4) t-statistic Prob.* Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -2.470960 0.3365 Test critical values: 1% level -4.532598 5% level -3.673616 10% level -3.277364 *MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values. Warning: Probabilities and critical values calculated for 20 observations and may not be accurate for a sample size of 19 Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation Dependent Variable: D(RE) Date: 07/06/09 Time: 20:12 Sample (adjusted): 1989 2007 Included observations: 19 after adjustments RE(-1) -0.336595 0.136220-2.470960 0.0269 D(RE(-1)) 0.309621 0.225829 1.371045 0.1919 D(RE(-2)) 0.587993 0.278330 2.112572 0.0531 C 6.279699 2.445227 2.568146 0.0223 @TREND(1986) 0.716462 0.306747 2.335676 0.0349 R-squared 0.384178 Mean dependent var 2.033158 Adjusted R-squared 0.208229 S.D. dependent var 2.016386 S.E. of regression 1.794211 Akaike info criterion 4.227942 Sum squared resid 45.06870 Schwarz criterion 4.476478 Log likelihood -35.16545 F-statistic 2.183460 Durbin-Watson stat 2.340205 Prob(F-statistic) 0.123915

76 5. Uji Kointegrasi a. Uji Durbin Watson Nilai statistik Durbin Watson (d-stat)= 1,6652 Nilai tabel (d-tabel) = 1,664 d-stat > d-tabel : terjadi kointegrasi antara variabel b. Cointegration Test Date: 07/06/09 Time: 20:53 Sample (adjusted): 1988 2007 Included observations: 20 after adjustments Trend assumption: Linear deterministic trend Series: Y P RE X Lags interval (in first differences): 1 to 1 Unrestricted Cointegration Rank Test (Trace) Hypothesized Trace 0.05 No. of CE(s) Eigenvalue Statistic Critical Value Prob.** None * 0.888538 98.60109 47.85613 0.0000 At most 1 * 0.846822 54.71964 29.79707 0.0000 At most 2 * 0.565609 17.19654 15.49471 0.0275 At most 3 0.025681 0.520335 3.841466 0.4707 Trace test indicates 3 cointegrating eqn(s) at the 0.05 level * denotes rejection of the hypothesis at the 0.05 level **MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999) p-values Unrestricted Cointegration Rank Test (Maximum Eigenvalue) Hypothesized Max-Eigen 0.05 No. of CE(s) Eigenvalue Statistic Critical Value Prob.** None * 0.888538 43.88145 27.58434 0.0002 At most 1 * 0.846822 37.52310 21.13162 0.0001 At most 2 * 0.565609 16.67621 14.26460 0.0204 At most 3 0.025681 0.520335 3.841466 0.4707 Max-eigenvalue test indicates 3 cointegrating eqn(s) at the 0.05 level * denotes rejection of the hypothesis at the 0.05 level **MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999) p-values

77 Unrestricted Cointegrating Coefficients (normalized by b'*s11*b=i): Y P RE X -7.11E-07 0.025481 0.145441-0.000458-3.23E-06-0.031781-0.925107 0.001403 1.04E-06 0.003091-0.027859-0.000228 2.91E-07 0.004695 0.306380-0.000425 Unrestricted Adjustment Coefficients (alpha): D(Y) -752991.8 244814.6-621175.7-17559.95 D(P) -23.43847 1.346564 5.545139-0.754164 D(RE) 0.512961-0.705025-0.150439-0.230607 D(X) 255.8854-272.4609-453.0230 7.047843 1 Cointegrating Equation(s): Log likelihood -560.5535 Normalized cointegrating coefficients (standard error in parentheses) Y P RE X 1.000000-35836.89-204549.7 643.5654 (4283.47) (67284.2) (110.433) Adjustment coefficients (standard error in parentheses) D(Y) 0.535400 (0.17376) D(P) 1.67E-05 (2.3E-06) D(RE) -3.65E-07 (3.1E-07) D(X) -0.000182 (0.00013) 2 Cointegrating Equation(s): Log likelihood -541.7920 Normalized cointegrating coefficients (standard error in parentheses) Y P RE X 1.000000 0.000000 180805.3-202.2904 (12437.0) (10.3692) 0.000000 1.000000 10.75303-0.023603 (0.94090) (0.00078)

78 Adjustment coefficients (standard error in parentheses) D(Y) -0.254492-26967.49 (0.77794) (9591.36) D(P) 1.23E-05-0.640033 (1.1E-05) (0.13143) D(RE) 1.91E-06 0.035477 (1.3E-06) (0.01627) D(X) 0.000697 15.17929 (0.00055) (6.76755) 3 Cointegrating Equation(s): Log likelihood -533.4539 Normalized cointegrating coefficients (standard error in parentheses) Y P RE X 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000-161.8354 (26.8379) 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000-0.021197 (0.00170) 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000-0.000224 (0.00015) Adjustment coefficients (standard error in parentheses) D(Y) -0.900514-28887.81-318690.1 (0.57835) (6821.12) (156434.) D(P) 1.81E-05-0.622891-4.809115 (9.9E-06) (0.11709) (2.68522) D(RE) 1.75E-06 0.035012 0.731021 (1.4E-06) (0.01623) (0.37233) D(X) 0.000226 13.77881 301.8927 (0.00039) (4.64749) (106.584)