What Makes Special Education Special: Individualized Education Without the STAAR-M

Similar documents
Serving Students with Unique Needs: students with disabilities

Technical Assistance Paper

Mastery-Based Learning. Guidelines for Implementation June 3, 2015

Committee On Public Secondary Schools. Standards for Accreditation

Curriculum Management

Belmont Public Schools Special Education Programs

NEWS INFORMATION and BEST PRACTICES FOR INCLUSION IN MARYLAND

NEW TSPC SPECIALIZATION: AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER. Q and A. May 24, 2012

Gifted/Talented Education Frequently Asked Questions revised 02/13/12

Birmingham Public Schools Systems Review of District Special Education Programs and Services Final Report

RISS RtI Needs Assessment and Planning Process

Role and Special Education in. A Principal s

Response to Intervention Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Improve programs and funding for Special Education

Service Delivery Models

CASE s ESEA REAUTHORIZATION RECOMMENDATIONS

QUALITY INDICATORS FOR ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES RESEARCH-BASED REVISIONS, 2004

MCD OUTCOME COMPONENT SCHOOL PLAN

Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds

North Carolina School Library Media Coordinators Standards

The 20 Non-Negotiable Characteristics of Higher Performing School Systems

Instructional Technology Standards Proposed by the GaPSC Instructional Technology Task Force December 2010

ARLINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS AND SERVICES

FCI Academy Community School District IRN Ohio Department of Education, Office for Exceptional Children Onsite Review Summary Report

IOWA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

TEACHER CERTIFICATION STUDY GUIDE INFORMATION ACCESS AND DELIVERY IN THE LIBRARY MEDIA PROGRAM

Instructional Practices. Curriculum Differentiation Discrete Trial Overview Age Appropriate Materials

Teacher Rubric with Suggested Teacher and Student Look-fors

IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

How To Improve The Curriculum At Minnetonka School District

The Model of Successful School Nursing

Chapter 7: Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)

Kansas Multi-Tier System of Support

The Least Restrictive Environment (LRE): Question & Answer Document

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Professional Development Self- Assessment Guidebook

M.A. in Educational Administration

Increasing Inclusive Practices in the Boston Public Schools. June 2013

GUIDELINES FOR THE IEP TEAM DATA COLLECTION &

Palo Alto High School Special Education Department Course Catalog and Department Information

Instructionally Appropriate IEPs. A Skills Based Approach to IEP Development Division of Special Populations

Pennsylvania Assistive Technology Consultant Competencies

HINGHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS GUIDE TO STUDENT SERVICES. Special Education and English Learner Education

RtI Response to Intervention

Commission on Teacher Credentialing. Education Specialist Clear Program Standards

Middleborough Public Schools

Principal Practice Observation Tool

Project-Based Learning for all students entering Kindergarten to Grade 12. Used by Missouri school districts since 2000! New STEM. Courses for 2016!

Ensure Everyone Travels the Path of High Expectations

New York State Professional Development Standards (PDF/Word) New York State. Professional Development Standards. An Introduction

Facilitated Modules 60 inservice credits. Assessment and Evaluation 60 inservice credits Facilitated

NYC Department of Education Flexible Programming Guide. March 2012

TLE Observation and Evaluation Rubric Teachers

Individual Education Program (IEP) Form Guidance

Key Principles for ELL Instruction (v6)

CLASSROOM WALKTHROUGH CHECKLISTS Development Process

Horizons on the Hudson Elementary School Newburgh, New York IB, Primary Years Program Special Education Policy

SPECIAL EDUCATION, COMMUNITY RESOURCES AND TRANSITION FOR THOSE WITH DISABILITIES

cbe.ab.ca reporting Considerations for students with Alberta Education Special Education Coding K-9

Professionals Responsible for Campus Turnaround Plan Development: Name:

***Draft * Draft * Draft * Draft * Draft*** International Society for Technology In Education (ISTE) Technology Coach Program Standards

1. What was the process used to develop the delivery system for eligible individuals?

REQUEST FOR PERSONAL CURRICULUM

International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme (IB MYP)

APPENDIX A: Examples of Observations and Documentation

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Instructional Technology Facilitators

ALTERNATE ACHIEVEMENT STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS WITH THE MOST SIGNIFICANT COGNITIVE DISABILITIES. Non-Regulatory Guidance

Response to Intervention

How to Earn a Master of Arts in Minnesota

Standards for Special Education Teachers

Such alternatives to the above qualifications as the board may find appropriate and acceptable.

Indiana s Department of Education STEM Education Implementation Rubric

The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support

TOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES

Description of Services

North Carolina Professional Technology Facilitator Standards

NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

Writing Instructionally Appropriate IEPs

CHAPTER 4 THE INDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAM (IEP) INTRODUCTION A. IEP TEAM

ADAPTED PHYSICAL EDUCATION GUIDELINES IN CALIFORNIA SCHOOLS

Individualized Education Program (IEP)

Forum on Public Policy

Cyber School Student Teaching Competencies

School of Education MASTER OF SCIENCE IN EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION. MSED: Early Childhood Education

Requirements EDAM WORD STUDY K-3: PRINT AWARENESS, LETTER KNOWLEDGE, PHONICS, AND HIGH FREQUENCY WORDS

Special Education Program Descriptions

READING WITH. Reading with Pennsylvania Reading Specialist Certificate

Comprehensive Reading Plan K-12 A Supplement to the North Carolina Literacy Plan. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

Multi-Tiered Systems of Support Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTI²) June 2016 Tie Hodack & Susan Jones Tennessee Department of Education

Illinois Center for School Improvement Framework: Core Functions, Indicators, and Key Questions

How To Write A Curriculum Framework For The Paterson Public School District

PROPOSED PROGRAM MODIFICATIONS 5/4/2010

Kennedy Krieger School: Montgomery County Campus Special Education for Students Ages 7 21

Reading Street and English Language Learners

Postgraduate Certificate / Postgraduate Diploma / Masters in Special and Additional Learning Needs

MILLIKIN TEACHING STANDARDS

Understanding Special Education in the OCDSB

NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS

PRESCHOOL/ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAM (IEP)

Pre-Requisites EDAM-5001 Early Literacy Guiding Principles and Language

SPECIAL EDUCATION PLAN

Transcription:

Great Ideas Convention 2015 Thought Leader What Makes Special Education Special: Individualized Education Without the STAAR-M Becky Moschgat, MA, Ed, ECE Kathleen Bliss, MA Ed. ECE Heather Moore MA SPED C.A.R.E., Private Consultants

What's So Special About Special Education: Life After The STAAR-M I. Introduction Kathleen Bliss, MA Ed. ECE Becky Moschgat, MA Ed. ECE Heather Moore, MA SpEd A. Foundation B. Law C. Continuum of Special Education Services II. Connection Between General Education and Special Education Teachers A. General Education Teachers Need to be Curriculum Experts B. Special Education Teachers Need to be Experts In the Areas of Interventions and Supports to the Curriculum C. Effective Student-Focused Collaboration III. Establishing the Difference Between Accommodations and Modifications of Curriculum According to State Standards A. Understanding the Accommodation/Modification Pathway of Learning B. How the Hierarchy of Accommodations/Modifications Affect the General Curriculum IV: How Does This All Relate to Life After The STAAR-M? A. One Assessment cannot drive all instruction and programming B. Accommodations need to be utilized in the areas of instruction, grading, and assessment in order to be effective C. Lack of a modified State test does not preclude classroom-level modifications V. Conclusion Contact Information for Educational Trainings: C.A.R.E. www.educatorscare.com Kathleen Bliss, MA Ed. ECE C.A.R.E Consultant kathleenbliss@sbcglobal.net Becky Moschgat, MA Ed. ECE C.A.R.E. Consultant bjmoschgat@aol.com Heather Moore, MA SpEd C.A.R.E. Consultant hmoores4@aol.com

The Law What We Know The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments (IDEA) (P.L. 105-17) explicitly emphasize the importance of providing access to the general education curriculum, so that students with disabilities can meet the educational standards that apply to all children. Specifically to insure: Access to general education curriculum Regular education classroom Maximum extent possible Special Education is not a place Support and services: what and where One curriculum general education curriculum Special Education s Perspective IDEA s LRE Provision To the maximum extent appropriate, children with disabilities, are educated with children who are not disabled, and special classes, separate schooling, or other removal of children with disabilities from the regular educational environment occurs only when the nature or severity of the disability of a child is such that education in regular classes with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily. Section 612 (a)(5) (A) (IDEA 04) Supplementary Aids and Services are. aids, services, and other supports that are provided in regular education classes or other education- related settings to enable children with disabilities to be educated with non- disabled children to the maximum extent appropriate in accordance with [LRE]. Section 602 (33) (IDEA 04) Access to the General Education Curriculum To ensure access of the child to the general education curriculum, so that he or she can meet the educational standards within the jurisdiction of the public agency that apply to all children. Section 300.39 (b) (3) (ii) (IDEA 04) Bliss, Moore, Moschgat 2015

Providing a Continuum of Services The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA) requires states to establish procedures to ensure, "that to the maximum extent appropriate," students with disabilities are educated with children who are not disabled. Programs serving children with learning disabilities as well as those with speech/language and other related services requirements need to be available in all schools. These services will range from simple external supports such as monitoring to specialized supports provided outside of the general education classroom or off campus. The implication of the law suggests that services should be delivered first, if appropriate, in the individual students least restrictive environment (LRE), with their typically developing peers before considering a more restrictive setting such as a resource or special education classroom. Providing a continuum of service is contingent on effective collaboration between general education and special education staff. This starts with collaborative discussions between curriculum directors, special education directors and directors of general education instruction. General education teachers bring their expertise of the standards, design and delivery of the general education curriculum to the team. Special education teachers bring a wide variety of research-based strategies and interventions that facilitate student engagement and learning. Combining the general education teachers expertise of curriculum as designed, and the special education teachers expertise with research-based strategies and interventions of specially designed curriculum, leads to effective collaboration. Bliss, Moore, Moschgat 2015

Accommoda(on/Modifica(on!!Pathway!of!Learning!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Same!!!!!!!!!!Des(na(on! Grade Level Curriculum And Standards Accommoda(on!! Road!!!Same!!!!!!!!!!!! Des(na(on! Grade&Level& Curriculum/& Standards& Different!! Des(na(on! Other& Standards& Curriculum and/ or Standards Modifica(on!! Road! Standards based curriculum typically provides a variety of levels of instruction that are designed to meet the needs of a diverse population of learners. When data indicates the student continues to struggle with the curriculum, as designed, accommodations can be implemented. When considering interventions, many educators use the terms accommodations and modifications interchangeably when, in fact, they are distinctively different terms. In order to effectively program for students, educators need to understand the difference between providing accommodations and/or modifications to the curriculum. Accommodations are supports and services that help students demonstrate their learning. They provide instructional practices, procedures, and tools designed to lessen the effect of the student's disability by allowing equitable access to grade-level curriculum. Collaboration between general education and special education teachers is the cornerstone to providing appropriate classroom accommodations. As depicted in the Accommodations/Modifications Pathway to Learning visual above, students may require differentiated instruction allowing for a different delivery and response mode to their learning. Their path toward the goal may vary, but the end goal is the same as their grade-level peers, specifically grade-level standards. Modifications are specially designed to provide the student opportunities to acquire and demonstrate knowledge and understanding of enrolled grade-level standards by reducing and or simplifying the complexity of the concepts and `standards. The modified learning should be vertically aligned to the standard even though the learning is not at grade-level. Modifications change the scope of the curriculum. If accommodations are used effectively and completely, within the framework of the grade-level curriculum, a very small percentage of students will need to travel the pathway of modifications leading to alternative goals and standards. Bliss, Moore, Moschgat 2015

How The Hierarchy of Accommodations/Modifications Affect The General Curriculum ACCOMMODATIONS Layer 0 No changes All students are assigned the same assignments. Standards and grading remain the same for everyone. Layer 1 Minimal changes All students are assigned basically the same assignments, except some receive additional environmental supports/tools for self-regulation, organization, or reinforcement. (Some accommodations) Standards, and grading/assessments remain the same for everyone. Environmental tools/supports embedded into classroom structure. Layer 2 Significant Changes Layer 3 Complex Changes All students are assigned basically the same assignments, except some receive a different delivery style or lesson design to accommodate their disability. (Significant accommodations) All students are delivered the same basic content. There are changes in how it is learned, assessed, and/or graded. (Complex accommodations) Standards and grading/assessments remain the same for everyone. Instruction may be differentiated for individual learners. Standards remain same. Instruction and grading/assessments may be differentiated for individual learners. MODIFICATIONS Layer 4 Some Changes to Curricular Standards Layer 5 Significant Changes to Curricular Standards Layer 6 Complex Changes to Curricular Standards Some students are assigned reduced or similar assignments that are more appropriate to their skill level. (Some modifications) Students are assigned a smaller part of the general education curriculum. (Significant modifications) Students are assigned alternative activities relating to the general education curriculum. (Complex modifications) Instruction, assessments, and grading are outside of standards but vertically aligned. Instruction, assessments, and grading are outside of standards, but vertically aligned. Instruction, assessments, and grading are based on individual goals and class participation. Adapted by Bliss, Moore, Moschgat (2015) from STatewide Autism Resources & Training Center (START, 2010), Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, Michigan.

Life After the STAAR-M With the STARR-M is no longer an assessment option for students with disabilities, confusion about programming and accountability prevails. It is important for administrators to ensure the fidelity of their programs by emphasizing effective daily instruction as it relates to the state standards rather than an emphasis on the state assessment alone. The challenge is to remain student focused, while maintaining the rigor of both general and special education instruction. If a full continuum of services is provided along with appropriate and effective accommodations, the majority of students will be assessed appropriately through the current framework of the STAAR With Accommodations and STAAR Accommodated. The law ensures access to the general education curriculum, so the learner can meet the educational standards within the jurisdiction of the public agency that apply to all children. This implies that curriculum should be accommodated and/or modified based on student need and disability, not teacher preference, ease of programming or the availability of a modified assessment. The STAAR-M is gone. May it rest in peace. The good news, we can, and must, still accommodate and modify curriculum and assessments. We must train our teachers to be skilled in the effective use of accommodations and modifications for student programming. STARR-M, we will miss you. Rest in peace. Challenging Your Thinking Throughout our presentation, our goal has been to challenge your thinking on the special education services provided in your district. We have covered the law, the need for effective collaboration between general education and special education staff, accommodations and modifications to curriculum, and moving forward from the STARR-M. It has been our pleasure to lead you through this Thought Session. Bliss, Moore, Moschgat 2015