INSURANCE & INDEMNIFICATION



Similar documents
Chapter XI INSURANCE. While many insurance policies do not cover environmental remediation and damages, insurance. A. General Liability Insurance

FORC QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF INSURANCE LAW AND REGULATION

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION

Adrian G. Driscoll's Representative Experience

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION

Business Insurance. AKD Consultants Adam Dworkin CPA 188 Whiting Street Suite 10 Hingham, MA

Kenneth B. Walton Senior Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group direct fax

Kenneth B. Walton Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group Member, Executive Committee direct fax

Sterling Education Seminar. Business Liability Insurance. Alexandrea L. Isaac Hartford, CT Sept. 20, 2011

Amy S. Harris Shareholder

Construction Defect Action Reform Act

FOR PROPERTY LOSS AND DAMAGE 1

OCIPs and Professional Responsibility

WCD LITIGATION SUPPORT AND CLAIMS EXPERIENCE

RISK MANAGEMENT IN CONTRACTS

AN OVERVIEW OF EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY INSURANCE AND PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS FROM A PLAINTIFF S PERSPECTIVE

PUBLIC ENTITY RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY MEMORANDUM OF WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY COVERAGE

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION

ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE By Bruce H. Schoumacher

What are the main liability policies you should consider for your commercial business?

MASSACHUSETTS INSURANCE LAW UPDATE

Introduction to Directors and Offi cers Liability Insurance

CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT LIMITS POLLUTION EXCLUSION IN CGL POLICIES. By Christopher W. Olmsted

Professional Practice 544

Errors and Omissions Insurance. 1.0 Introduction and Definition

PUBLIC ENTITY POLICY LAW ENFORCEMENT LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM OCCURRENCE COVERAGE

Insurance Bulletin. Risk Transfer Techniques. Risk Transfer. Certificates of Insurance

The Expert Navigators in Maritime, Transportation and Insurance Law

United States Workers Compensation/Indemnification Overview

A&E Briefings. Indemnification Clauses: Uninsurable Contractual Liability. Structuring risk management solutions

Insurance Policyholder Practice Group

How To Defend A Policy In Nevada

Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp. v Burlington Ins. Co NY Slip Op 30564(U) April 14, 2015 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /2012 Judge:

How To Defend An Employee Against An Employee In A Construction Accident

ATTACHMENT A.6 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS ROUTINE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR PROJECTS

IDC Member Insurance Program brought to you by LMS PROLINK Ltd.

Construction Practice Group

Title XLV TORTS. Chapter 768 NEGLIGENCE. View Entire Chapter

FOLLOW THE SETTLEMENTS: BAD CLAIMS HANDLING EXCEPTION. Robert M. Hall

California Civil Code

SECTION 3 AWARD AND EXECUTION OF CONTRACT

Insurance Coverage Issues for Products Manufactured by Foreign Companies

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 1, 2003 Session

WORKERS COMPENSATION SUBROGATION AND THIRD PARTY SETTLEMENTS. B. Industrial Revolution and Workers Compensation Statutes

Indemnification Clauses, Part 1* Discussion from a/e ProNet's Risk Management and Contract Guide. J. Kent Holland, Jr., Esq.

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Products Liability and Insuring Protection. ForanGlennonPalandechPonzi&Rudloff PC

Allocating Defense Costs Among Multiple Insurers and Between Covered and Uncovered Claims

Liability Insurance Guidelines For Water Restoration and Mold Contractors April 2013

Other Insurance and the CGL Policy

Contractual Liability and the CGL Policy

2013 CASE LAW SUMMARY. Insurance Coverage. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Casar, 104 So. 3d 384 (Fla. 3d DCA, 2013)

CLAIMS AGAINST TRANSLATORS: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART ONE: PREVENTION AND MITIGATION

CLAIMS AGAINST TELEPHONE ANSWERING SERVICES: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART TWO: WHAT TO DO WHEN A CLAIM HAPPENS

THE STATE OF FLORIDA...

The Insurance Coverage Law Information Center

PARRY G. CAMERON, Senior Attorney

PART 15--ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIMS UNDER FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT

EXHIBIT B-8 (revised) INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR AIRCRAFT / AIRPORT OPERATION CONTRACTS

No-Fault Automobile Insurance

MASSACHUSETTS CUSTOMIZED PRACTICE COVERAGE TITLE INSURANCE AGENT LIABILITY COVERAGE UNIT

Obtaining Indemnity Through Effective Tender Letters

SAMPLE SERVICES CONTRACT

PROTECTION FROM PERSONAL LIABILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION DEFECT CLAIMS

Indemnity Agreements & California s Crawford Decision: Its Implications and Strategies for Defense

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LACLEDE COUNTY. Honorable G. Stanley Moore, Circuit Judge

2 Summary of California Law (10th), Insurance

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS )SS:

The Duty to Defend Inextricably Intertwined Actions

INSURANCE 101 YOUR USER FRIENDLY HANDBOOK A CO-OPERATIVE EFFORT BETWEEN THE ORGANIZATION FOR PARENT PARTICIPATION IN CHILDCARE AND EDUCATION, ONTARIO

FOSTER PARENT LIABILITY PROGRAM

Directors & officers (D&O) liability insurance claims scenarios

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS (A) This insert applies to the following State Contracts:

MISCELLANEOUS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE FORM

H. The Contractor shall not begin work under the contract until the required insurance has been obtained and approved by the Contracting Agency.

Henkel Corp v. Hartford Accident

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR SUPPLIER AGREEMENT. and include your affiliates. We, us, our, and ours refer to ConSol Partners, LLC. Client refers to.

NORTH BEACH WATER DISTRICT PACIFIC COUNTY, WASHINGTON

CAMBRIDGE PROPERTY & CASUALTY SPECIAL REPORT

The Solution for General Partnership Liability Coverage Part

Reverse and Render in part; Affirm in part; Opinion Filed December 29, In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Transcription:

INSURANCE & INDEMNIFICATION Insurance Defense For over 15 years, Pashman Stein has provided legal representation to insureds in all types of litigation, including negligence, personal injury, construction, toxic tort, environmental, asbestos, professional malpractice and employment cases in state and federal courts throughout New Jersey and New York. At the outset of our representation, the assigned attorney works with the insurer to develop a strategy and budget for the case. A result oriented, cost effective approach by defense matters is emphasized. The Pashman Stein attorney then works aggressively and closely with the insurer and insured for a successful disposition. Our track record of successful results includes environmental matters involving the defense of third-party property damage and bodily injury claims resulting from the insureds alleged transportation, disposal or use of hazardous waste, defense of mold-related and lead paint lawsuits, defense of municipalities, developers, contractors, sub-contractors, property owners and managers, defense of sellers of asbestos-containing products, representing management and employers in discrimination, wrongful termination and wage and hour claims, representing professionals in professional liability claims against accountants, architects, engineers and lawyers; representing insureds in slip and fall and automobile accident cases. Representative Cases: Lead Poisoning Cases Successful defense of landlords in minor lead poisoning cases. Worked closely with pediatric neurologists and psychologists to formulate medical causation defenses. Noxious Fume Cases Successful defense of plumbing contractor resulting from personal injuries involving toxic fumes from sewer back up. Successful defense of moving company for personal injuries claimed by worker s from adjoining facility for carbon monoxide exposure. Successful defense of Contractor who renovated Jersey City school and 40 teachers brought personal injury claims resulting from exposure to hazardous fumes.

Exterior Insulated Finish System Cases (EFIS) Successful defense of builders, contractors and subcontractors involved in construction of homes clad in EFIS in which personal injury and property damage claims were asserted. Landfill Litigation Cases Successful defense of insured s who disposed of hazardous or other materials at waste sites in which CERCLA and NJ Spill Act claims were asserted against the insured. Environmental Litigation Successful defense of corporate and individual property owners involving claims of responsibility for contamination of properties. Obtained dismissal of claim by developer against insured municipality for underground water contamination due to alleged over-salting of neighboring roads by municipality. Legal Malpractice Cases Successful defense of lawyers involved in transactional and other claims involving deviation of acceptable standards of care. Water Infiltration/Mold Growth Cases Successful defense of claims by homeowners against roofing companies and general contractors for defective work, water infiltration and personal injury due to mold exposure. Workplace Injury Litigation Successfully defended claim against construction site owner by worker injured in fall at site. Asbestos Litigation Successful defense of suppliers in asbestos personal injury cases. Insurance Coverage For 15 years, the lawyers of Pashman Stein have been developing and implementing innovative legal strategies to assist businesses and individuals in obtaining insurance coverage for an ever-increasing range of liabilities and losses. Pashman Stein has represented not only large corporate policyholders, but also numerous midsize and smaller companies and their officers and directors in connection with insurance claims and issues as well as insurancerelated strategic concerns. Many policyholders, in numerous industry groups have turned to Pashman Stein to address large and small loss or liability issues. Our attorneys routinely field insurance coverage questions from our clients, prosecute suits on their behalf and work out resolution of client s coverage issues with insurance companies.

Pashman Stein regularly advises clients that have received notice from an insurer of a denial or reservation of rights to deny coverage for a particular claim. To develop the best strategy for clients, immediately upon retention, Pashman Stein regularly performs an analysis of the prospects for obtaining coverage. This initial analysis involves a written report reviewing: (a) the relevant facts of the claims situation, (b) the relevant insurance policy language; and (c) the applicable state insurance law. Based on that review, Pashman Stein provides recommendations on whether and how best to pursue insurance recovery for the claim at issue. Our attorneys also have been retained by many clients that already have received adverse insurance coverage decisions at the trial legal and seek our counsel and experience in pursuing an appeal on their behalf. In addition, Pashman Stein offers a broad range of additional services in connection with its insurance coverage practice including: Service Areas Coverage Opinions Investigation of Complex Claims Reservation of Rights Letters Arbitration of Policy Disputes Bad Faith Litigation Declaratory Relief Suits Insurer Contribution actions Pursuit of Additional Insured Coverage Practice Areas Commercial General Liability Commercial Property Commercial Umbrella Liability Excess Liability Fidelity and Surety Pollution Liability Products Completes Operations Liability Professional Errors and Omissions Recent reported insurance coverage decisions handled by our attorneys, include: LCG Investments, Inc. v. Merchants Mutual Insurance Company, 2006 WL 15708 (N.J. Super. App. Div. 2006) Won recovery of substantial debris removal costs for insured in the first New Jersey decision to construe the debris removal provision in Business Owner s policy following fire that destroyed a major hardware business. Vergopia v. Zelnick, 383 N.J. Super 256 (App. Div. 2006) aff d 191 N.J. 217

(2007) Successfully litigated novel issue of whether attorney who represented corporation but also served as a corporate officer of the company was entitled to indemnification for several hundred thousands of dollars in legal fees from the corporation when he was sued in his individual capacity. Myron v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Corporation, 2007 WL 432624 (N.J. Super. Law Div. 2007) Won victory for policyholder on question of whether insurer was obligated to provide a defense in nationwide lawsuits involving claims asserted against it under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Result was reimbursement of hundreds of thousands of past defense costs and payments of substantial defense costs on a going forward basis. Myron v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Corporation, 407 N.J. Super. 302 (App. Div. 2009) Aff d. 203 N.J. 537 Won victory for insured on the issue of whether N.J. Ct. R. 4:42-9(a)(6), which provides for the award of counsel fees to a claimant who successfully sues its insurance company, would apply to fees incurred in an out-of-state court when the ultimate coverage determination was rendered in New Jersey. Bridge Metal Industries, LLC. C. Travelers Indemnity Company, 812 F.Supp.2d 527(S.D.N.Y. 2011) Won victory for policyholder on question of whether insurer was obligated pursuant to the advertising liability provision of its policy to provide a defense to insured in two lawsuits involving Lanham Act and Unfair Competition claims. Result was the reimbursement of fees and costs the insured expended in successfully defending the underlying matters. Indemnification & Advancement Fees Pashman Stein attorneys also advise individual and corporate clients concerning their rights and/or obligations under indemnification and advancement of legal fees provisions of corporate by-laws and operating agreements. While New Jersey s corporate laws require companies to indemnify corporate officers who successfully defend lawsuits against them, New Jersey companies also can provide in their corporate governance documents other conditions upon which they will advance defense costs or indemnify employees or officers prior to the conclusion of litigation. Whether a company is required to advance legal fees to an officer or director often can determine whether the employee will be able to defend the claims against him or her. Our attorneys provide advice to clients regarding drafting and interpreting indemnification and advancement provisions, and represent

clients pursuing coverage or defending against claims for coverage. Our attorneys have litigated some of the only reported decisions on this important, and often overlooked, area of coverage. For more information, please contact: Dennis Smith dsmith@pashmanstein.com 201.488.8200