MANUAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PROCEDURES

Similar documents
Methods of Making Sanitation Ratings Of Milk Shippers

PMO Inspection - HACCP Audit Comparison Table

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE COOPERATIVE STATE-PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE/FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM OF THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE

PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE COOPERATIVE STATE-PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE/FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM OF THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE

United States Department of Agriculture Office of Inspector General

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION FIELD OPERATIONS TRAINING MANUAL

Hancock County Combined General Health District Plumbing Regulations

Decree N 152 (24 January 2013) Administrative Measure on Inspection, Quarantine and Supervision of Imports and Exports of Dairy products

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

Kroger Manufacturing Trailer Seal Policy Revised 09/03/10

FSIS Security Guidelines for Food Processors

GUIDELINES FOR FOOD IMPORT CONTROL SYSTEMS

Helical Products Co., Inc.

Asbestos Licensure Law. Code of West Virginia Chapter 16, Article 32 (As amended by the 1993 Legislative Session)

How to Write a Dairy Job Description

Glossary: The terms listed, whenever they appear in this document, are to be interpreted to mean the following:

BUCKS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR CONDUCTING AND OPERATING FOOD FACILITIES

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION ACT Act 138 of The People of the State of Michigan enact:

GUIDE TO IMPLEMENTING A REGULATORY FOOD SAFETY AUDITOR SYSTEM

NC SBI QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

Food Defense Self-Assessment Checklist for. Slaughter and Processing Plants

Part I GENERAL CONDITIONS. 1. Any activities not identified in the application are not authorized by this permit.

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF WASTE MANAGEMENT

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES AMENDED RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATIVE TO

BVD qpcr Bulk Milk Test

Community Unit School District No :110. General Personnel. A safety-sensitive function includes, but is not limited to:

Kitsap Public Health Board Ordinance Food Service Regulations

DAIRY INDUSTRY SURVEY RESULTS. Richard C. Maurer and Terry L. Lunsford University of Kentucky November 2007

CP#64 / Environmental Monitoring Services

Supplier Quality Assurance

Procedure for Procurement and Receipt

FOOD SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (FSMS): REQUIREMENTS FOR ANY ORGANISATION IN THE FOOD CHAIN (ISO 22000:2005)

HAMILTON COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES. Solid Waste Transfer Station Refuse Disposal & Recycling Site Rules and Regulations

IAC 7/11/12 Environmental Protection[567] Ch 68, p.1 CHAPTER 68 COMMERCIAL SEPTIC TANK CLEANERS

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC IN-PLANT PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (IPPS)

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES AMENDED RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATIVE TO

* * * a. four (4) years electrical work experience approved by the board; which shall include the following:

RULES OF THE ALABAMA BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS

13 LC S. The House Committee on Health and Human Services offers the following substitute to HB 178: A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT

Purpose and intent of rule Scope and application Employer's Duties and Responsibilities

Section 2. A new Chapter 8.38 is hereby added to Title 8 of the Brea City Code to read as follows: CHAPTER 8.38: REGULATION OF ALARM SYSTEMS

CHAPTER Section 2 of P.L.1989, c.34 (C.13:1E-48.2) is amended to read as follows:

Food Safety and Quality Management System

STATE OF MAINE IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN S.P L.D An Act To Update the Maine Veterinary Practice Act

CHAPTER 4. Regulation of Private Alarm Systems

SAFETY and HEALTH MANAGEMENT STANDARDS

Presentation by BSI on the main changes to the IATF ISO/TS certification scheme

MARSHALL UNIVERSITY HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL SECTION

RULES AND REGULATIONS PERTAINING PLUMBERS LICENSE FEE, EXPIRATION, RENEWAL, JOURNEYMAN, AND MASTER PLUMBER QUALIFICATIONS

ORDER. ( the Commissioner ) against Joseph B. Jehoich ( Jehoich ) pursuant to Maryland Code

The purpose of this Supplier Quality Standard is to communicate the expectations and requirements of Baxter Healthcare Corporation to its suppliers.

a. A person whose sole function in the work is to perform labor under the supervision or direction of a building contractor.

Effective Dates and FDA Requirements in the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Prepared by Hogan Lovells US LLP, February 2011

Food Defense Supplier Guidelines

Food and Agriculture Services British Retail Consortium (BRC) Certification Manual

THE COUNTY COMMISSION OF TUCKER COUNTY, WV AN ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF FALSE ALARMS IN TUCKER COUNTY.

HP SUPPLIER ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE

ILLINOIS REGISTER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH NOTICE OF ADOPTED AMENDMENTS

Military Considerations

Article 6. Background Check CRIMINAL RECORD CLEARANCE 87355

Certification Procedure of RSPO Supply Chain Audit

Article 6 To monitor type-certified products, the type certification body shall assign professionals to perform the

What Employers Need to Know About the New STEM OPT Program. April 7, 2016

Department of Health and Human Services. No. 66 April 6, Part III

[CHAPTER 436H] ATHLETIC TRAINERS

SUBCHAPTER B: ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY ACCREDITATION

INCIDENT REPORT Smithfield Beef Group Souderton, INC., Establishment 1311 Export of Ineligible Beef to Japan Report

CHAPTER 4. Regulation of Private Alarm Systems

Last Reviewed: November 25, 2014 WOOD COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION. Policy Transportation Employees Alcohol and Controlled Substance Policy

Chapter 4. Regulation of Alarm Systems

LSUHSC-NEW ORLEANS RECORDS RETENTION AND DISPOSITION POLICY

Surgi Manufacturing Quality Manual

Administrative Policy

Quality Assurance Program for Design-Bid-Build Projects. January by Texas Department of Transportation 512/ All Rights Reserved

a. Be responsible for orientation, training, scheduling and supervision of dietary employees on all shifts; (1-1-88)

TAMPA BAY WATER Supplying Water To The Region

NEW YORK CITY TAXI AND LIMOUSINE COMMISSION. Notice of Public Hearing and Opportunity to Comment on Proposed Rules

Food Safety vs. Food Defense: Differences and Similarities

Making Recall Determinations

Minnesota s Drug and Alcohol Testing in the Workplace Act (Non-DOT)

HP1616, LD 2253, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To License Certified Professional Midwives

TITLE 42 LEGISLATIVE RULE WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF LABOR SERIES 34 REGULATION OF HEATING, VENTILATING AND COOLING WORK

REGULATION 2 PHARMACISTS

Lapse in Appropriations Contingency Plan Agricultural Marketing Service

KOLLMORGEN. Title: Standard Operating Procedure Counterfeit Parts

Annex 2 to the Memorandum of Understanding of the One Safety Project. Handbook for the subscription of contractors to the One Safety Project

CONCEPTS OF FOOD SAFETY QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. Mrs. Malini Rajendran

HACCP: Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points. Dr. Angela Shaw Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition Extension and Outreach

CSA CONSTRUCTION, INC McAllister Road Houston, Texas SUBCONTRACTOR AGREEMENT

Department of Labor and Industrial Relations

LASER SAFETY MANUAL UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR LASER USERS REVISED EDITION 2012 ISSUED BY

NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE TITLE 8, CHAPTER 7 LICENSURE OF PERSONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH POSITIONS. Authority. N.J.S.A. 26:1A-38 et seq.

2-1 TITLE 7 CONSTRUCTION REGULATIONS 2-4

Quality Management System Manual ISO9001:2008

APPRAISAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY

Chapter 9.58 LOST, STOLEN, OR ABANDONED SHOPPING CARTS

REGULATIONS GOVERNING FOOD SAFETY TRAINING FOR FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENTS MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN

ARTICLE 735. Emergency Alarm System

c) Provider Identification Number(s) associated with claims,

Transcription:

West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources MANUAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PROCEDURES Section Milk Date May 18, 1992 Procedure # M-16 Subject Drug Residue Enforcement and Monitoring Program for Grade "A" Raw Milk Page 1 of 6 The Food and Drug Administration has concurred with a proposal of the 1991 National Conference on Interstate Milk Shipments to add an Appendix N to the Pasteurized Milk Ordinance. Appendix N will help assure that milk suppliers are in compliance with safe levels or established tolerances for animal drug residues in milk. Section 17 of the West Virginia Grade "A" Pasteurized Milk Rules references the Grade A Pasteurized Milk Ordinance of the Food and Drug Administration and requires compliance with its appendices. The provisions of Appendix N to the PMO (copy attached) are therefore required to be enforced under the West Virginia Grade "A" Pasteurized Milk Rules. Food and Drug Administration interpretive memoranda regarding Appendix N are referenced as guidance in conducting required enforcement activities. Appendix N is being implemented in two phases as follows: INDUSTRY RESPONSIBILITIES - EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1992 A. Screen all bulk milk pickup tankers for beta lactam drug residues. All farm bulk pickup tankers must be screened before the milk is processed. The tanker may be unloaded. However, if the test is unsafe the commingled milk in the silo, storage tank, etc., is considered adulterated regardless of the effect of the dilution or any subsequent test of the commingled milk. Grade "A" raw milk intended for "manufacture grade" uses (cheese, ice cream) must meet the requirements of Appendix N. Preferable methods for testing beta lactam residues at the present time are B. Stearothermophilus disc assay, Charm I or II (liquid) or Delvo P. Until further directed, industry may use other methods which have been evaluated by Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Bishop et al, 1991) or equivalently evaluated methods which have been demonstrated to provide positive results for beta lactams and are acceptable to the Commissioner, WV Bureau of Public Health. At the option of industry a bulk tanker of milk may be discarded based on a screening test. A confirmation is required, however, to be conducted on the sample from the individual producer responsible for contaminating the load. If the results of a screening test are positive and the confirmation test is negative, the results of the confirmation test supersede the screening test results for either a bulk tanker load sample or an individual producer sample.

Page Two B. Screen for other drug residues (employing a random sampling program) as specified by FDA. Industry will be notified when drug residue screening other than beta lactams is required. C. Report to the health department immediately (as practical) all positive test results for drug residues from analysis done on commingled raw milk tanks, bulk milk pickup tankers, or finished milk or milk product samples. Initial notification under this requirement shall be done by telephone with hard copy follow-up of pertinent documents. Industry has been provided a list of persons who can be contacted regarding positive drug residue reports. Notification shall include information regarding the ultimate disposition of the raw or finished milk. The milk marketing or milk procurement organization serving the producer is responsible for notifying the health department immediately by telephone if the use of an "equivalent penalty" for suspension is desired as described under part B (page 3-4) of "Regulatory Responsibilities". Producer samples from a bulk milk pickup tanker found to be positive for drug residue must be individually tested to determine the farm of origin. Further pickups from the violative producer shall be discontinued until subsequent tests are no longer positive for drug residues. D. Dispose of milk with unsafe drug residue in a manner that removes it from the human or animal food chain except where acceptably reconditioned under FDA guidelines. Bulk tanker loads of milk with drug residue levels above safe levels shall be disposed of at properly operated animal waste management facilities with adequate holding potential; at public or commercial sewage treatment facilities with prior approval of the health department and treatment authority; or through other disposal methods with prior health department approval. Additional information on the approval status of animal waste management facilities for disposal of tanker loads of milk will be forthcoming. E. Record all drug residue sample results and retain the records for a period of at least six (6) months. West Virginia Bureau of Public Health issued or approved forms for recording drug residue tests are to be maintained at the raw milk receiving station or receiving plant. A copy of the record form must be submitted to the health department at the end of each month.

Page Two F. A "Quality Assurance Plan for Certification of Supervisors" (QAPCS) is being prepared for implementation whereby industry analysts will be qualified to perform screening tests under the supervision of a "certified supervisor" using FDA accepted screening tests. Once QAPCS is implemented and "certified supervisors" are in place at receiving stations, approved screening tests will be official for regulatory action under conditions approved by FDA, based on positive results. During the interim period, analysts who have not been officially recognized do not require "certification" to perform screening tests for beta lactams. REGULATORY RESPONSIBILITIES - EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1992 A. The WV Bureau of Public Health shall monitor industry drug residue surveillance activities by making unannounced on-site inspections to collect samples from bulk milk pickup tankers and to review industry records of the random sampling program. Inspections and sampling must be done at least quarterly and may be done as part of the routine plant inspection. Samples must be collected and analyzed from at least 10% of the bulk milk pickup tankers scheduled to arrive on the day of inspection. B. Permit Suspension and Revocation - The WV Bureau of Public Health shall immediately suspend for a minimum of two (2) days or equivalent penalty the Grade "A" permit of a producer responsible for a drug residue violation at or above the actionable level. Drug residue violations are considered an imminent hazard to the public health and, as such, permit suspension shall be immediate with no proposed order to suspend required to be issued. The WV Bureau of Public Health will accept documentation from a producer or the producer's milk marketing or milk procurement organization that a monetary penalty or milk loss equivalent to two (2) full days (48 hours) of production has been assessed. Following initial notification (see part C of "Industry Responsibilities"), documentation must be submitted on a written verification form provided by the health department. The equivalent penalty will be equal to a formal suspension and will appear on the producer's permanent record as a two day drug residue violation suspension.

Page Three Use of the equivalent penalty method for satisfy-ing the penalty requirement of Appendix N will reduce the volume of non-violative milk which must be dumped thereby reducing waste milk disposal problems. For example: If a tanker is screened positive and disc assay confirmation tests reveal that both the tanker and individual farm sample of the responsible producer are violative, the tanker load must be dumped. Notification to the health department that the dumped tanker load contained two days production for which the producer will not be paid would serve as equivalent to two days suspension. In the case of an every day shipper the equivalent penalty may be: One day monetary penalty due to a dumped tanker load plus one day monetary penalty due to milk loss (no pickup the day sub-sequent to causing a dumped tanker load), OR A two day monetary penalty if the producer dairy is assessed the cost of the entire tanker of milk provided the assessment is greater than or equal to two days of the producer's production. A suspension not using the equivalent penalty method will be for two (2) days effective from the time of notification of a confirmed violative drug residue. For example: If a tanker is screened positive and disc assay reveals a violative drug residue in an individual farm tank sample but the tanker load itself is not violative, the tanker load could be accepted by the processing plant and the producer compensated for his milk. In this case the health department would suspend the producer's permit for two days effective from the time of notification by the laboratory of the confirmed positive drug residue. The suspension would be carried out for the full two days even if subsequent tests before the end of the two day period revealed the milk was no longer violative for drug residue. On the second occurrence of violative drug residues in a twelve month period, the producer's permit shall be suspended for a minimum of four (4) days or equivalent penalty (with documentation as outlined above).

Page Four For a third occurrence of a violative drug residue in a twelve month period, the suspension shall be for a minimum of four (4) days or equivalent penalty (with documentation as outlined above). In addition, a proposed order to revoke the producer's permit shall be issued after the required four day suspension or equivalent penalty has been satisfied. The producer will be given an opportunity for a hearing on the proposed order to revoke the permit as provided for in the PMO and WV Grade "A" Pasteurized Milk Rules. C. Permit Reinstatement - After the required permit suspension or equivalent penalty has been satisfied, and a sample taken from the producer's milk in the farm bulk tank is no longer positive for drug residue, the producer's Grade "A" permit may be restored to a temporary permit status pending completion of the "Milk and Dairy Beef Residue Prevention Protocol". In no event shall the Grade "A" permit of the violative producer be fully reinstated until the producer and a licensed veterinarian have signed a quality assurance certificate for display in the milkhouse which states that the "Milk and Dairy Beef Residue Prevention Protocol" is in place and being implemented for the dairy herd(s) from which the adulterated milk containing violative drug residue was shipped. The "Milk and Dairy Beef Residue Prevention Protocol" is a quality assurance program designed to assist the producer in self-evaluation of production practices with the assistance of a veterinarian in the context of a valid veterinarian/client/patient relationship. Certification training, materials, etc., under the protocol are considered to be industry responsibilities. The WV Bureau of Public Health will assist with this program as resources permit. A maximum of thirty (30) days is considered adequate to have completed the "Milk and Dairy Beef Residue Prevention Protocol" although a greater time period may be allowed at the discretion of the health department on a case by case basis. A producer under temporary permit status who has not completed the "Milk and Dairy Beef Residue Prevention Protocol" within thirty (30) days will be issued a proposed order to suspend and afforded the opportunity for a hearing as provided for in the PMO and WV Grade "A" Pasteurized Milk Rules. D. Certification of industry supervisors in the use of approved drug test methodology will be the responsibility of the WV Office of Laboratory Services' Laboratory Evaluation Officers. A flow chart of the sequence of events to obtain full certification of industry supervisors is attached.

Page Six References 64 CSR 34 Grade A Pasteurized Milk Rule Grade A Pasteurized Milk Ordinance History Attachments Flow Chart Appendix N Penalty Verification Form