Control Number : 38339. Item Number : 516. Addendum StartPage : 0



Similar documents
Control Number: Item Number : 301. Addendum StartPage : 0

Case 3:09-cv N Document 473 Filed 06/15/2009 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Case Doc 352 Filed 05/31/12 Entered 05/31/12 12:23:01 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5

Case No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT RICHARD VAN HOUTEN, JR.; STEPHEN HALL,

Case 3:13-cv P Document 1-1 Filed 05/07/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID 10

Control Number : Item Number: 239. Addendum StartPage: 0

I1 I1I Ill II I1 I1Ill I I I1 Control Number: 30485

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, v. TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS

Control Number : Item Number : 38. Addendum StartPage : 0

Case rfn11 Doc 241 Filed 03/25/15 Entered 03/25/15 17:42:34 Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:14-cv BO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC Rate Schedule S-2 Tracking Filing

ER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

Case3:12-cv CRB Document51-1 Filed03/22/13 Page1 of 5

Case 1:08-cv LTS-DCF Document 264 Filed 09/04/15 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : : : : : :

March 20, On Wednesday, March 7, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission s staff held a public

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORID A ORLANDO DIVISION

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1312 Filed 05/13/15 Page 1 of 6

Case Document 126 Filed in TXSB on 10/09/15 Page 1 of 5

SUGGESTION OF SUBSEQUENTLY DECIDED AUTHORITY

Case Number: COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 101 W. Colfax Ave., Suite 800 Denver CO,

Case Doc 269 Filed 07/03/13 Entered 07/03/13 14:32:10 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA * * *

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION SIP INDUSTRIES REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM

Assistant Attorney General Florida Bar No Special Projects

Case: 4:12-cv CEJ Doc. #: 182 Filed: 07/17/12 Page: 1 of 4 PageID #: 4880

BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO

(TECO) First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-8) and First Request for Production of Docunients

Control Number : Item Number : 59. Addendum StartPage : 0

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. MiSC DOCket NO. 98m 9133

Case 2:09-cv JWS Document 153 Filed 01/27/15 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case3:12-cv CRB Document Filed08/31/15 Page1 of 8 EXHIBIT 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Control Number : Item Number : 9. Addendum StartPage: 0

BEFORE THE LAND USE COMMISSION STATE OF HAWAII

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants.

Case Document 73 Filed in TXSB on 04/19/12 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Appeal No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT APPLE INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, PSYSTAR CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. MiSC Docket N m J^- A 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. Misc Docket No. 97-_go I

May 5, Mr. Brian Almon Public Utility Commission of Texas 1701 N. Congress Avenue P.O. Box Austin, Texas

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:03-cv WMH Document 388 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/16/2007 Page 1 of 8

Case TPA Doc 7992 Filed 06/30/15 Entered 06/30/15 13:42:50 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 4

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

VANGUARD NATURAL RESOURCES, LLC (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

8:09-mn JFA Date Filed 06/28/12 Entry Number 228 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON DIVISION

Misc Docket No

MISC Docket Nov 99m 90,25

Case 1:12-cv JAL Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/05/2012 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA ################################### ################################;

Subject: PETITION FOR OWNERSHIP TRANSFER FROM PALEN SOLAR I TO NALEP SOLAR PROJECT I, LLC PALEN SOLAR POWER PROJECT DOCKET NO.

shl Doc Filed 11/20/13 Entered 11/20/13 11:33:51 Main Document Pg 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION

Case BLS Doc 1754 Filed 10/14/08 Entered 10/14/08 12:58:09 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 2

Case3:07-cv JSW Document123 Filed10/12/12 Page1 of 5

Control Number : Item Number : 11. Addendum StartPage : 0

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA

Case 9:15-bk DS Doc 30 Filed 12/16/15 Entered 12/16/15 14:42:26 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5

LEAD COUNSEL S MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES

Case3:13-cv JST Document52 Filed04/29/14 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. SOME DEBTOR, Case No (Chapter ) Debtor. JUDGE [NAME OF JUDGE]

Bull Mountain Meadows, LLC's corrective filing. Our File No

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. Finjan, Inc., Petitioner v. FireEye, Inc.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND DIVISION TRINITY HAVEN HEALTHCARE CASE NO RBK CENTER, INC.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Attorneys for Plainliff Dallas Faulkner

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM S-8 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF Delaware

Case 3:15-cv N Document 65 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID 2193 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case MFW Doc 3500 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Transcription:

Control Number : 38339 Item Number : 516 Addendum StartPage : 0

SOAH DOCKET NO. 473-10-5001 DOCKET NO. 38339 APPLICATION OF CENTERPOINT PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION ENERGY HOUSTON ELECTRIC, LLC FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES OF TEXAS SUPPLEMENTAL INDEX OF PRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS RESPONSIVE TO GULF COAST COALITION OF CITIES' FIFTH REOUEST FOR INFORMATION C... CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC hereby files as Exhibit A a supplem^ta.i^^-' index of privileged documents responsive to the Gulf Coast Coalition of Cities' Fifth ReqjWforv Information setting forth the required details regarding those documents and privileges cla". ^ 7, M -K-C, CD Z7 cn By; 00 t Y.r ason M. Ryan Assistant General Counsel State Bar No. 24033150 CenterPoint Energy, Inc. P.O. Box 61867 Houston, Texas 77208 713.207.7261 713.574.2661 (fax) Ann M. Coffin State Bar No. 00787941 PARSLEY COFFIN RENNER LLP 98 San Jacinto Boulevard Suite 1450 Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 879-0900 (512) 879-0912 (fax) ATTORNEYS FOR CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON ELECTRIC, LLC 61^

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was served on all parties of record in this proceeding, by facsimile, hand delivery, e-mail, or United States first class mail on this 22nd of September 2010. 2

Exhibit A Supplemental Index of Privileged Documents Responsive to GCCC RFI 5-8 Document # I Date: 2/5/2010 Email: FW: CEHE Rate Case Plan P arer/custodian: Wayne Roesler Scott Prochazka, Walter Fitzgerald, Kenneth Mercado, Jason Ryan, Kelly Gauger, Daniel Hagen,,, Stephen Bezecny, Denise Hardcastle, William Rice, Robert Roy, John Houston, John Slanina, Terry Finley Wayne Roesler Privileges: This email exchange with Mr. Ryan constitutes attorney-client communication and is therefore privileged. Document # 2 Date: 2010 Regulated Operations Rate Calendar Preparer/Custodian: Regulatory Dept. Scott Prochazka, Walter Fitzgerald, Kenneth Mercado, Jason Ryan, Kelly Gauger, Daniel Hagen,,, Stephen Bezecny, Denise Hardcastle, William Rice, Robert Roy, John Houston, John Slanina, Terry Finley Wayne Roesler Privileges: The referenced document was prepared in anticipation of litigation and is therefore privileged work roduct. Document #3 Date: 3/23/2010 Email: Update: Houston PGA and CEHE EMR Bruce Coogler, George Hepburn, Joseph McGoldrick, Scott Prochazka, Wayne Roesler, Scott Rozzell, Tom Standish, Richard Zapalac Privileges; This email exchange with Mr. Rozzell, Mr. Hepburn and Mr. Ryan constitutes attorney-client communication and is therefore privileged. Document # 4 Date: 3/23/2010 Email: Re: CenterPoint EMR

Preparer/Custodian: Privileges: Jason Ryan The email exchanges with Mr. Ryan in this document constitute attorneyclient communication and are therefore privileged. Document # 5 Date: 3/23/2010 Email: Update Houston PGA and CEHE EMR Scott Rozzell,, Wayne Roesler Privileges: The email exchanges with Mr. Rozzell in this document constitute attorney-client communication and are therefore privileged. Document # 6 Date: 3/24/2010 Email: Re: Earnings Monitoring Report EMR for 2009 Preparer/Custodian: Jason Ryan, Scott Prochazka, Wayne Roesler,, Scott Rozzell, Daniel Hagen Jason Ryan Privileges: The email exchanges with Mr. Rozzell and Mr. Ryan in this document constitute attorney-client communication and contain attorney work product and are therefore privileged._ Document # 7 Date: 3/24/2010 Email: Re: Earnings Monitoring Report (EMR) for 2009 Preparer/Custodian: Wayne Roesler, Scott Rozzell, Tom Standish, Scott N Prochazka, Paul Gastineau, Jason Ryan, Daniel Hagen Privileges: Wayne Roesler The email exchanges with Mr. Rozzell and Mr. Ryan in this document constitute attorney-client communication and contain attorney work product and are therefore privileged. Document # 8 Date: 3/24/2020 Email: Re: Earnings Monitoring Report (EMR) for 2009 Preparer/Custodian: Jason Ryan

Privileges: The email exchanges with Mr. Ryan in this document constitute attorneyclient communication and contain attorney work product and are therefore rivile ed. Document # 9 Date: 3/25/10 Email: UPDATE: Earnings Monitoring Report (EMR) Tom Standish, Wayne Roesler, Scott Rozzell,, Jason Ryan Privileges: The email exchanges with Mr. Rozzell and Mr. Ryan in this document constitute attorney-client communication and is therefore privileged. Document # 10 Date: 3/25/2010 Email: EMR Preparer/Custodian: David McClanahan,, Wayne Roesler, Scott Prochazka, Jason Ryan, Scott Rozzell Privileges: The email exchange with Mr. Rozzell and Mr. Ryan in this document constitutes attorne -client communication and is therefore privileged. Document # 11 Date: 3/26/2010 Email: EMR Discussion with Alfred Moran, Jason Ryan, Wayne Roesler, Scott Prochazka Privileges: The email exchange with Mr. Ryan in this document constitutes attorneyclient communication and is therefore privileged. Document # 12 Date: 3/29/2010 Email: Re: **UPDATE: CEHE Rate Case** Preparer/Custodian:, Wayne Roesler, Tom Standish, Scott Rozzell, Scott Prochazka, Jason Ryan, Daniel Ha en Privileges: The email exchange with Mr. Rozzell and Mr. Ryan in this document constitutes attorne -client communication and is therefore privileged,

Document # 13 Date: 3/29/2010 Email: Re: **UPDATE: CEHE Rate Case** Preparer/Custodian: Daniel Hagen, Jason Ryan, Tom Standish, Scott Rozzell, Scott Prochazka, Daniel Hagen Privileges: The email exchanges with Mr. Ryan and Mr. Rozzell in this document constitute attorney-client communication and contain attorney work product and are therefore privileged. Document # 14 Date: 3/29/2010 Email: Re: Cost Allocation Preparer/Custodian: Jason Ryan, Wayne Roesler, Privileges: The email exchange with Mr. Ryan in this document constitutes attorneyclient communication and is therefore privileged.