FARM PROGRAMS IN THE 2014 FARM BILL

Similar documents
ARC/PLC Program Overview

U.S. Farm Policy: Overview and Farm Bill Update. Jason Hafemeister 12 June Office of the Chief Economist. Trade Bureau

Title I Programs of the 2014 Farm Bill

AFBF Comparison of Senate and House Committee passed Farm Bills May 16, 2013

How To Calculate Safety Net Programs In The Farm Bill

The Supplementary Insurance Coverage Option: A New Risk Management Tool for Wyoming Producers

THE 2014 FARM BILL: Overview & Major Highlights

U.S. crop program fiscal costs: Revised estimates with updated participation information

this section shall not count toward pay limits under the 2014 Farm Bill limits. (Section 1119)

JOINT EXPLANATORY STATEMENT OF THE COMMITTEE OF CONFERENCE

Will ARC Allow Farmers to Cancel Their 2014 Crop Insurance (Updated)? 1

THE 2014 FARM BILL: Overview & Decision Tool

Farm Programs and Crop Insurance

Farm Commodity Programs and the 2007 Farm Bill

Analysis of the STAX and SCO Programs for Cotton Producers

Revenue Implications of the New Farm Bill

Research verification coordinators collaborate with Arkansas Division of Agriculture crop specialists to determine a typical production method for

1. Prices now 2. TA APH yield endorsement 3. Re-rating 4. Suggestions

Details of the Proposed Stacked Income Protection Plan (STAX) Program for Cotton Producers and Potential Strategies for Extension Education

2014 Farm Bill How does it affect you and your operation? Cotton STAX & SCO

Farm Programs and Crop Insurance Design and Risk Management Implications

Both the House and Senate farm bills include two new supplemental crop insurance programs:

Protecting Your Investment- Canola Crop Insurance Options

Multiple Peril Crop Insurance

How To Insure A Crop

Factors Influencing ACRE Program Enrollment

A New Farm Program Option: Average Crop Revenue Election (ACRE)

Federal Crop Insurance RISK MANAGEMENT. Chris Eddy Dell s Insurance Agency

Evaluating the Impact of Proposed Farm Bill Programs with Crop Insurance for Southern Crops. Todd D. Davis * John D. Anderson Nathan B.

3.3 Real Returns Above Variable Costs

Implications of Crop Insurance as Social Policy

In 2010, many farmers will again choose between farm

FARM LOAN PROGRAMS Women in Ag DIRECT LOAN PROGRAM 2/15/2013 GUARANTEED LOAN PROGRAM. Becky Wiiest Farm Loan Manager

Tennessee Agricultural Production and Rural Infrastructure

Revenue and Costs for Corn, Soybeans, Wheat, and Double-Crop Soybeans, Actual for 2009 through 2015, Projected 2016

How Crop Insurance Works. The Basics

Lower Rates Mean Lower Crop Insurance Cost 1

Crop Insurance: Background Statistics on Participation and Results

FUTURES TRADERS GUIDE TO THE WASDE

From Catastrophic to Shallow Loss Coverage: An Economist's Perspective of U.S. Crop Insurance Program and Implications for Developing Countries

TITLE I COMMODITY PROGRAMS

The Impact of Alternative Farm Bill Designs on the Aggregate Distribution of Farm Program Payments. Keith H. Coble and Barry J.

Research Report Comparison of the counter cyclical payment program to a proposed counter cyclical revenue program

Evaluating Taking Prevented Planting Payments for Corn

CRS Report for Congress

Managing Risk With Revenue Insurance

Group Risk Income Protection Plan and Group Risk Plans added in New Kansas Counties for Updated 3/12/05

AIC Farm Bill Brief #1

Market-Driven Inventory System (MDIS)

Soybean Supply and Demand Forecast

2. To determine APH yields, can crop insurance history be used? The last program (2002) required actual scale tickets from the grain elevator.

2014 CMA, DMA, and LSA Interim LDP and Marketing Loan Gain (MLG) Reconciliation Process and Deadline Approved by: Deputy Administrator, Farm Programs

Appendix A. A Nonstochastic Comparison of Price- and Revenue-Based Support

298,320 3, ,825. Missouri Economic Research Brief FARM AND AGRIBUSINESS. Employment. Number of Agribusinesses.

Common Crop Insurance Policy (CCIP) DR. G. A. ART BARNABY, JR. Kansas State University 4B Agricultural Consultants

Crop Insurance Plan Explanations and Review

Post-Freedom to Farm Shifts in Regional Production Patterns

Abstract. Acknowledgments

Crop Input and Technology Decisions: Risk Management. Gary Schnitkey University of Illinois

CHOOSING AMONG CROP INSURANCE PRODUCTS

HIGH-RISK ALTERNATE COVERAGE ENDORSEMENT STANDARDS HANDBOOK

University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture. Department of Agricultural Economics & Agribusiness

Quick Cash Flow Projections

Agricultural Outlook Forum For Release: Monday, February 23, 1998 AGRICULTURAL RISK MANAGEMENT AND THE ROLE OF THE PRIVATE SECTOR

Crop Insurance and Shallow Loss Product Choices

Managing Specialty Crop Risk in North Carolina: A Working Paper

An Analysis of a Market-Driven Inventory System (MDIS)

Seventh Multi-year Expert Meeting on Commodities and Development April 2015 Geneva

Precision Farming Technology Systems and Federal Crop Insurance

New Issues with Crop Insurance for Diversified, Sustainable and Organic Farmers

CROP REVENUE COVERAGE INSURANCE PROVIDES ADDITIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT WHEAT ALTERNATIVES 1

Grain Inventory Management

Federal Crop Insurance: The Basics

Dairy Margin Protection Program of the 2014 Farm Bill

Grain Stocks Estimates: Can Anything Explain the Market Surprises of Recent Years? Scott H. Irwin

PREMIUM RATE ADJUSTMENT

Grains and Oilseeds Outlook

CROP INSURANCE FOR NEW YORK VEGETABLE CROPS

Usual Planting and Harvesting Dates for U.S. Field Crops

Managing Risk in Production Agriculture

SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS ON KFMA FARMS

Crop Insurance as a Tool

Impact of Crop Insurance and Indemnity Payments on Cash Rent and Land Values. Michael Langemeier Center for Commercial Agriculture Purdue University

Group Risk Income Protection Plan added in Kansas for 2006 Wheat (Updated) 1

Outlook for the 2013 U.S. Farm Economy

Market will worry about demand later Weekly Corn Review for May 11, 2016 By Bryce Knorr

2013 Crop Insurance Decisions March 4, Roger Betz Senior District Extension Farm Management Agent

4. Existing agricultural insurance systems in the World

University of Illinois CROP BUDGETS. Consumer Economics

Farmland Lease Analysis: Program Overview. Navigating the Farmland Lease Analysis program

CONNECTIONS. Toole County CONSERVATION DISTRICT, EXTENSION SERVICE, FARM SERVICE AGENCY, & NATURAL RESOURCES & CONSERVATION SERVICE

On average, however, producers do under-perform the market more so in corn than in soybeans.

Federal Crop Insurance: Background and Issues

CROP BUDGETS, ILLINOIS, 2014

CROP INSURANCE. Reducing Subsidies for Highest Income Participants Could Save Federal Dollars with Minimal Effect on the Program

STACKED INCOME PROTECTION PLAN OF INSURANCE (STAX) STANDARDS HANDBOOK

18. Agricultural Policy

Estimating Cash Rental Rates for Farmland

Annual Forage (AF) Pilot Program

CROP BUDGETS, ILLINOIS, 2015

Transcription:

FARM PROGRAMS IN THE 2014 FARM BILL Jonathan Coppess University of Illinois jwcoppes@illinois.edu 217 244-1865

COMMODITY TITLE PROGRAMS & DECISIONS

KEY PROVISIONS Direct Payments, Counter-Cyclical Payments, ACRE and SURE are eliminated. Price Loss Coverage (PLC); or Agriculture Risk Coverage at the county level (County ARC); or Agriculture Risk Coverage at the individual level (Individual ARC)

KEY PROVISIONS (CONT.) Continues Marketing Assistance Loans with Marketing Loan Gains and Loan Deficiency Payments (LDP) as in 2008 Farm Bill (same loan rates; except cotton) New crop insurance product called Supplemental Coverage Option (SCO); only for PLC commodities

KEY PROVISIONS (CONT.) Payment Limits & Eligibility $125,000 per person all inclusive (PLC, ARC County and ARC Individual, plus any marketing loan gains or LDP s); all commodities except peanuts Separate $125,000 for peanuts Single AGI of $900,000 (3-year rolling average)

DECISIONS The following decisions are made for each Farm Service Agency (FSA) farm; are made only once by date to be determined by FSA and cannot be changed for the life of the 2014 farm bill: 1) Retain or reallocate base acres 2) Update payment yields 3) Program Elections/Selections: PLC (commodity-by-commodity) County ARC (commodity-by-commodity) Individual ARC (all commodities)

BASE ACRES All programs make payments on base acres Farm s total base acres cannot be increased, but farm owners can elect to: Retain current base acre allocation across program crops; or Reallocate base acres across program crops based on proportion of planted (and prevent planted) in 2009 to 2012 years (Note: special rules for generic base acres that were cotton base)

REALLOCATING BASE EXAMPLE FSA farm with 100 base acres 55 corn; 35 soybeans; 10 wheat 2009 to 2012 plantings averaged: 75 corn; 25 soybeans Base Acre Alternative: Retain current base acre allocation (55 corn; 35 soybeans; 10 wheat) Reallocate base acres (75 corn 25 soybeans)

PAYMENT YIELDS Payment yields are only used for PLC Farm owners can choose: Update payment yields to 90% of the average yields from 2008 thru 2012 Keep current payment yields at levels used in 2008 Farm Bill Counter-Cyclical Payments

PROGRAM CHOICE For each FSA farm, producers and farm owners must choose: For each program crop, enroll in either: PLC; or County ARC Or, for all program crops on the farm, enroll in Individual ARC.

PROGRAM CHOICE (CONT.) A farm could choose County ARC and PLC for different crops (for example, County ARC for corn; PLC for soybeans); If Individual ARC is elected, it is for all crops and no PLC, County ARC or SCO. Default: if no choice is made in 2014, all crops default to PLC in 2015 and the farm forfeits any potential 2014 payments

PRICE LOSS COVERAGE (PLC) PLC Payments: Triggered when the Market Year Average (MYA) price is below the Reference Price. MYA is for the 12-month marketing year of the crop (e.g., the 2014 MYA for corn and soybeans is Sept. 2014 through Aug. 2015). Crop Corn Soybeans Wheat Grain Sorghum Barley Oats Other Oilseeds Dry peas Rice Peanuts Lentils Small chickpeas Large Chickpeas Reference Price $3.70 per bu. $8.40 per bu. $5.50 per bu. $4.95 per bu. $4.95 per bu. $2.40 per bu. $20.15 per cwt. $11.00 per cwt. $14.00 per cwt. $535 per ton $19.97 per cwt. $19.04 per cwt. $21.54 per cwt.

PRICE LOSS COVERAGE Calculations Payment Rate = Reference price (higher of) MYA price or loan rate Payment = Payment rate X payment yield X 85% of crop s base acres [Note: Payment yields can be updated; Base acres can be reallocated]

PLC EXAMPLE Corn: McLean County, Illinois Reference Price $3.70 MYA Price $3.55 Payment Rate (Reference MYA) $0.15 = $3.70 $3.55 Payment Yield Base Acres 100 150 bu./acre Payment (Rate X Yield X 85% of Base) $1,913 = $0.15 X 150 bu. X (85% of 100)

AGRICULTURE RISK COVERAGE

COUNTY ARC Benchmark Revenue = Guarantee = Actual Revenue = Payment Rate = Payment = Calculations 5-year Olympic average county yields X 5-year Olympic average MYA Prices (reference price replaces prices below it; 70% of T-yield replaces county yields below it) 86% of the Benchmark Revenue county average yield X MYA price Guarantee Actual Revenue (when actual revenue is below the guarantee); not to exceed 10% of Benchmark Revenue Payment Rate X 85% of the Base Acres

COUNTY ARC BENCHMARK REV. Year Price County Yield 2009 $3.70* 186 2010 $5.18 169.5 2011 $6.22 159.6 2012 $6.89 109.5 2013 $4.50 188 5-Year Olympic Avg. $5.30 171.7 Benchmark $910 Guarantee (86% of Benchmark) $783 Corn McLean County, Illinois *2009 price $3.55 is replaced by $3.70 reference price Used in Olympic average calculation

COUNTY ARC EXAMPLE Corn: McLean County, Illinois 2014 MYA Price (USDA estimate) $3.90 2014 County Yield (Trend) 180 Base Acres 100 2014 Actual Revenue $702 = $3.90 X 180 Guarantee (86% of Benchmark) $783 (previous slide) Max. Payment $91 (10% of $910 benchmark) Payment Rate (Guarantee Actual up to Max) $81 = $783 $702 Payment (Rate X 85% of 100 base) $6,852 = $81 X 85% of 100

COUNTY ARC BENCHMARK REV. Year Price County Yield 2009 $9.59 54.0 2010 $11.30 58.5 2011 $12.50 56.0 2012 $14.40 52.3 2013 $12.70 55.0 5-Year Olympic Avg. $12.17 55.0 Benchmark $669 Guarantee (86% of Benchmark) $575 Soybeans McLean County, Illinois No prices were below the Reference Price Used in Olympic average calculation

County ARC Example Soybeans: McLean County, Illinois 2014 MYA Price (USDA estimate) $9.65 2014 County Yield (Trend) 56 Base Acres 100 2014 Actual Revenue $540 Guarantee (86% of Benchmark) $575 Max. Payment $67 Payment Rate (Guarantee Actual up to Max) $35 Payment (Rate X 85% of 100 base) $2,982

INDIVIDUAL ARC NOTES: operates on the sum of all covered commodities on all farms enrolled in Individual ARC calculations are based on the producer s share of production on all farms in the state in Individual ARC Crop year planted acres determine the weights used to calculate revenue (actual and benchmark) Payments made on 65% of Base acres for all program crops on the farm

INDIVIDUAL ARC Revenues Calculations: Benchmark Revenue Each program crop s revenue for each of the 5 most recent crop years is calculated individually = Yield X MYA (reference price replaces prices below it; 70% of T-yield replaces farm yields below it) Olympic Average Revenues Weighted Sum is Benchmark Rev. Each crop s revenue for each of the 5 most recent crop years, dropping the highest and lowest revenues Current crop year s planted acreage of each crop used to weight the Olympic average revenue of each crop; all weighted Olympic average revenues added together = Benchmark Revenue

INDIVIDUAL ARC Revenues Planted Acres Weighted Sum is Actual Rev. Calculations: Actual Revenue Calculate revenue for each crop = farm level yield in the crop year X MYA price for the crop year Acres planted to each crop used to weight the actual revenue Each crop s revenue is weighted by planted acres and added together to get the actual Individual ARC revenue

Individual ARC Benchmark Revenue = Guarantee = Actual Revenue = Payment Rate = Payment = Calculations Continued Weighted sum of the Olympic average revenues for all planted program crops 86% of the Benchmark Revenue Weighted Sum of actual revenues for all program crops Guarantee Actual Revenue (when actual revenue is below the guarantee); not to exceed 10% of Benchmark Revenue Payment Rate X 65% of the Base Acres for all program crops on the farm

INDIVIDUAL ARC 2014 CALCULATIONS Corn: McLean County, Illinois Year Yield Price Rev. 2009 186.0 $3.70* $688 2010 169.5 $5.18 $878 2011 159.6 $6.22 $993 2012 109.5 $6.89 $755 2013 188.0 $4.50 $846 Olympic Average Rev. $826 Soybeans: McLean County, IL Year Yield Price Rev. 2009 54.0 $9.59 $518 2010 58.5 $11.30 $661 2011 56.0 $12.50 $700 2012 52.3 $14.40 $753 2013 55.0 $12.70 $699 Olympic Average Rev. $687 *the $3.55 MYA is replaced with the reference price Used in the Olympic average calculation

INDIVIDUAL ARC EXAMPLE McLean County, IL (representative farm) 100 base acres 60 planted corn 2014 40 planted soybeans 2014 MYA Corn = $3.90 2014 (Trend) Yield Corn = 180 bu. 2014 MYA Soybeans = $9.65 2014 (Trend) Yield Soybeans = 56 bu. Benchmark Revenue $770 = (0.6 X $826) + (0.4 X $687) Guarantee $662 = 86% of the Benchmark Actual Revenue $637 = (0.6 X $702) + (0.4 X $540) Payment Rate (difference) Max. Payment (10% of Benchmark) Payment $25 $77 $1,631 = $25 X 65% of 100 total base acres

INITIAL CONCLUSIONS Presuming trend yields for corn and soybeans, County ARC in 2014 would reach the cap in most Midwestern counties at prices well above the Reference Prices but below USDA s projected prices. Individual ARC payments likely smaller than County ARC payments.

INITIAL CONCLUSIONS (CONT.) Corn: $3.70 Reference Price If MYA prices stay above, County ARC provides assistance with price declines; PLC will not If MYA prices extremely low ($3.00 or less), PLC might provide more assistance (at least in years 4 & 5) Soybeans: $8.40 Reference Price MYA forecasts are well above the Reference Price, County ARC provides assistance with expected declines but PLC will not

DECISION CONSIDERATIONS What are your price expectations? For PLC to be effective for Midwestern corn and soybeans, prices will have to collapse County ARC guarantee will decline if prices remain low Keep in mind: County ARC on a commodity = ineligible for PLC and SCO Individual ARC = entire farm ineligible for PLC and SCO

QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. JONATHAN COPPESS JWCOPPES@ILLINOIS.EDU