2011 Quarterly Index Q1 & Q2. Randstad Employee Attachment Index. Executive Summary

Similar documents
EDUCATION POST 2015 Parent Attitudes Survey

Optimizing Rewards and Employee Engagement

Sample interview question list

INSPIRING THE NEXT GENERATION WORKFORCE THE 2014 MILLENNIAL IMPACT REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Benefits make up an important component of the employment. Employee Benefits in a Total Rewards Framework. article Business Case for Benefits

For Optimal Sales Force Performance, Pay Is Not Enough

Employee Engagement Survey Nova Scotia Government-wide Report

skills mismatches & finding the right talent incl. quarterly mobility, confidence & job satisfaction

7 DRIVERS FOR BUILDING EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT: FROM HIRE TO RETIRE

in partnership with EMPLOYEE OUTLOOK EMPLOYEE VIEWS ON WORKING LIFE

2016 Edenred-Ipsos Barometer Understand and improve Wellbeing At Work. May 2016

The Impact of Successful Employee Referral Programs

16 th Annual Transamerica Retirement Survey Influences of Educational Attainment on Retirement Readiness

RCSA QUARTERLY HIRING INTENTIONS SURVEY OCTOBER TO DECEMBER 2013 REPORT AUSTRALIA

Building a Unique Total Rewards and HR System For A Unique Company At

FCR The Driver of All Other Metrics

Strategic human resource management toolkit

Employer Brand Analytics

Writing a degree project at Lund University student perspectives

Consulting Performance, Rewards & Talent. Measuring the Business Impact of Employee Selection Systems

STRESS MANAGEMENT SURVEY

MOTIVATION CHECKLIST

Research Grant Proposals-Sample Sections. Implications for HR Practice - examples from prior proposals:

When you hear the word engagement, you

UNC Leadership Survey 2012: Women in Business

Creating Careers. Together.

Employee Engagement: The psychology behind individual behaviours

The MetLife Survey of

CUSTOMER SERVICE SATISFACTION WAVE 4

Survey of Healthy San Francisco Participants

Personal Branding. Our survey reveals the performance drivers for Brand YOU. June 2012

PointofView. Public Perceptions of Medicare vs. Private Health Insurers

2015 UCISA Award for Excellence Entry

Employee Engagement FY Introduction. 2. Employee Engagement. 3. Management Approach

Building HR Capabilities. Through the Employee Survey Process

PROPOSAL TO DEVELOP AN EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT PROGRAMME

Branding the Government As An Employer of Choice

The automotive manufacturing sector is

Creating Line of Sight

Spring in partnership with. Employee Outlook

THE STAY INTERVIEW KICK START GUIDE. 5 Simple Steps to Dramatically Improve Engagement & Retention

EMPLOYER BRANDING THE IMPACT ON RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION

POLITY research & CONSULTING

March 12, 2007 Survey Results on Education Among California Business Leaders

The greatness gap: The state of employee disengagement. Achievers 2015 North American workforce survey results

50 Tough Interview Questions

THE CUSTOMER COMES SECOND!

9Lenses: Human Resources Suite

Microsoft Get It Done Survey of Office Workers

Teens and Personal Finance

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION. This chapter will focus on background of the study, briefly state the research problem,

WE HELP COMPANIES IDENTIFY, SELECT & DEVELOP EXCEPTIONAL LEADERS, MANAGERS & TEAMS

Aging in Asia and Oceania AARP Multinational Survey of Opinion Leaders 2006

Recruitment and retention strategy Safeguarding and Social Care Division. What is the recruitment and retention strategy? 2. How was it developed?

July Management Practice & Productivity: Why they matter

Managing Your Career Tips and Tools for Self-Reflection

Executive Summary Full report is available online at

The Missing Link: Driving Business Results Through Pay-for-Performance. For Small & Midsized Businesses. Copyright 2007 SuccessFactors, Inc.

hrpa.ca/ac2016 #HRPA2016 Recruiting in a Competitive Market 1

Creating Line of Sight

Executive Summary. Tom P. Haney Technical Center

2016 Talent Attraction Study: How Top Performers Search for Jobs

Threat Management Survey GLOBAL FINDINGS

Build a Better Workplace: Engagement Edition

Culture of Purpose Building business confidence; driving growth 2014 core beliefs & culture survey

application and on-boarding for engineering professionals

Bob Hassell. Hassell Blampied Associates February 2013

How CDI is Revolutionizing the Transition to Value-Based Care

Emergency Room Services Satisfaction Survey

Our clients are tapping social media to generate brand awareness and create emotional connections.

Right: People Roles Recognition - Culture

January 2014 Preliminary survey report: the skill needs of major Canadian employers

Da Vinci Community School

Small Business. Optimism Report

Why Your Employer Brand Matters

Hispanic Americans On the Road to Retirement

Environmental Scan of the Radiographer s Workplace: Technologist vs. Administrator Perspectives, 2001 February 2002

Dear New Small Business Customer,

Building Resilience: An Integral Approach

MAA American Mathematics Competitions

Executive Search Insights

Long-Term Care Insurance:

ARHINFUL LORETTA ABA A (844974) SAM PETRA MENSIMAA (844794) AHMED SK ASHIF (843888)

Global Staffing Trends Relationships at the core

Marketing Negotiated Benefits and Employment Attributes For Recruitment and Retention

GENDER DIVERSITY STRATEGY

The Recruitment Quotient:

Healthcare in the Midst of Change: Linking Engagement and HR Transformation

Boomer Expectations for Retirement Sixth Annual Update on the Retirement Preparedness of the Boomer Generation

Risk Management Strategy and Policy. The policy provides the framework for the management and control of risk within the GOC

Fourth Quarter 2014 Published by HRO Today Magazine in Cooperation with Yoh Recruitment Process Outsourcing

6 Ways Social Collaboration Can Boost Employee Engagement

BUILDING AND SUSTAINING TALENT. Creating Conditions in High-Poverty Schools That Support Effective Teaching and Learning

Building a Culture of Employee Engagement

Survey of DC pension scheme members

Think you know the Next Gen investor?

IS A STAFFING COMPANY REALLY WORTH IT?

Mobile Youth Around the World

TOP 10 LOGISTICS MANAGER PROBLEMS & HOW TO OVERCOME THEM

Employee Engagement in the Continuing and Long Term Care Sectors

Transcription:

2011 Quarterly Index Q1 & Q2 Randstad Employee Attachment Index Executive Summary

Employee Attachment Index overview The Randstad Employee Attachment Index provides insight into employees degree of attachment along with valuable data on engagement, retention, quality, and productivity. Employee attachment is achieved by combining engagement and retention strategies to create a strong bond with employees, ultimately resulting in higher levels of motivation, productivity and profitability. Better understanding how employee engagement and retention work together to create attachment can ultimately drive business impact. The index is important because engagement is often misinterpreted as an indicator of retention. As the Employee Attachment Index illustrates, there are many highly engaged workers who also are at serious risk of leaving. To better understand this, employers need to be able to more effectively measure their bond with employees. Because the Employee Attachment Index is a combination of both engagement and retention scores, it can help employers identify which segments of their workforce are engaged, retained and motivated to make a difference. Based on employee responses to an online survey, the Randstad Employee Attachment Index comprises an overall Attachment score assigned each quarter which indicates where employees sentiments, potential actions and attitudes are positioned. Survey findings also point to indicators to reduce potential employee volatility. The quarterly survey was fielded in March and June 2011, among employees and employers. Additionally, employers will be surveyed annually to compare differences in perceptions and attitudes which may impact employee attachment. Randstad Employee Attachment Index 2

Key Findings Snapshot: Attachment is on the rise and a majority of employees are staying on the job, expressing they are inspired, proud of their work and enjoy going to work every day. This is good news for employers. But employers also need to better understand what drives these sentiments. Being able to understand employee attachment and any cracks in the attachment bond are critical for employers trying to manage in a tumultuous economy with a war for talent predicted in the near future. Degree of attachment is on the rise, five points from March to June 2011 Employee volatility is trending downward, indicating employees are less likely to seek, seriously consider or accept a job offer in the next six months 71 percent of employers have trouble finding the right people for the right positions When asked how employees feel about their current jobs, top three answers included: feeling inspired to do their best, proud to work there and enjoy going to work everyday 23-point gap exists between how important employees versus employers feel good pay and benefits are for organizations to show their commitment to employees 29 percent of the most highly engaged employees are likely to seriously consider a new job within the next six months 51 percent of employers report struggling to keep their best employees from leaving 26 percent of employees surveyed gave their company a D or F when it comes to motivating employees to go the extra mile and offering opportunities for advancement Randstad Employee Attachment Index 3

Employee Attachment Index score The current average attachment score is up 5 points between March and June 2011. The rise in Attachment can be attributed to increases in the engagement and retention scores of employees. More importantly, companies need to understand the drivers of attachment. What factors inside and outside of their companies are driving these increases among employees? Employee Attachment Index 100 105 All employees Mar 2011 Jun 2011 Q3 Q4 Employee volatility on the decline In June, employees were less likely to say that they intend to consider or seek a new job, indicating lower levels of volatility. Employers can take advantage of employees possible apprehension about the economy and job market to strengthen attachment with their most valuable talent. Likelihood of seeking, considering or accepting a new job in the next six months: Trended % Very/somewhat likely Seriously consider another job offer Seek out a job in a different organization 44 38 34 40 40 34 30 Seek another position in your current organization Accept an enticing job offer from another company Mar 2011 Jun 2011 Q3 Q4 Randstad Employee Attachment Index 4

Alert: Jeopardy for the highly engaged With engagement and retention as key pillars of attachment, understanding the equations of all three is important. Employees that fall into the High Engagement category make up 37% of the workforce while 15% fall into the Moderate and Low Retention categories. This represents a significant portion of the most desirable, highly engaged workforce that is at risk for leaving. Retention by engagement Low Engagement (Total: 31%) Moderate Engagement (Total: 33%) High Engagement (Total: 37%) most desirable and safe 6% 12% 22% High Retention (Total: 39%) 9% 11% 8% Moderate Retention (Total: 27%) 17% 10% 7% Low Retention (Total: 34%) most desirable and at risk A quarter of the highly engaged, likely to leave Twenty-nine percent of the most highly engaged employees are somewhat to very likely to seek, consider or accept a new job in the next six months. Employers need to identify their highly valued employees who are volatile, and find ways to keep them motivated, engaged and attached to their company. Likelihood of seeking, considering or accepting a new job in the next six months: by engagement level Least engaged 20% 23% 30% 28% Somewhat engaged 35% 29% 26% 10% Highly engaged 49% 22% 16% 13% Very unlikely Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely Very likely Randstad Employee Attachment Index 5

Employer employee disconnect There are significant disconnects around what employers believe are important to employees and what employees actually find rewarding about their jobs. Understanding what is important to employees will help employers drive policies and programs that enhance and increase productivity and engagement levels, ultimately helping to drive retention. For employees, the two most important attributes are feeling their efforts are recognized and valued and that they enjoy going to work every day. The largest gap between employee perspective and how employers believe employees feel, also exist within these two attributes. Important attributes that impact how employees feel about their jobs Feeling that your efforts are recognized and valued 53 62 GAP 9 Enjoying going to work every day 35 49-14 Feeling inspired to do your best 26 33-7 Being proud to work for your company or organization 29 29 0 Trusting that the leaders of your company or organization make good decisions 22 28 6 Knowing that the company or organization you work for shares your values 15 20 Employees Employers 5 Factors motivating employees to consider changing jobs While inadequate pay is a top reason employees give for considering a new job, high stress and lack of career development are top complaints leading to job changes. Reasons for considering changing jobs in the next six months Inadequate pay 38 High stress level Lack of opportunity for advancement 23 24 Insufficient benefits Unpleasant/difficult work conditions 17 17 Excessive workload Lack of stimulation/boredom Difficult relationship with manager and/or co-workers 13 13 14 Long/difficult commute Lack of motivation 10 9 None of these 21 Randstad Employee Attachment Index 6

Commitment in question With continued economic unrest, many employees continue to look inside their own companies for security. Many employers, however, are not making the grade when it comes to demonstrating employee commitment. Twenty-six percent of employees surveyed gave their company a D or F when it comes to motivating employees to go the extra mile and offering opportunities for advancement. Employees grading their organization on commitment to employees Making sure that employees have the tools and technology they need 23% 35% 26% 10% 5% 2.6 GPA Offering good pay and benefits 22% 34% 26% 11% 7% 2.5 Ensuring a good work-life balance 22% 31% 29% 11% 7% 2.5 Offering training opportunities Providing fair and constructive feedback about employees performance Creating a positive and constructive company/organizational culture Making employees feel that they are a valuable part of the company/organization Motivating employees to go the extra mile 22% 30% 28% 12% 7% 20% 31% 28% 12% 8% 21% 31% 27% 14% 8% 21% 28% 28% 14% 10% 17% 26% 30% 16% 10% 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.2 Offering opportunities for advancement 17% 25% 32% 15% 11% A B C D F 2.2 Employers optimistic around motivation Employers tend to rate employees at their organization better than employees rate themselves. This is particularly true in the area of motivation, indicating that employers may be more confident in employees levels of motivation than what they truly feel. Employees vs. employers: Attitudes toward employees at their organization Getting along well with each other 94 GAP 11 Well trained 93 14 Highly qualified 92 13 Committed to doing their jobs to the best of their ability 78 92 14 Highly motivated 64 88 24 Employees Employers Randstad Employee Attachment Index 7

Employers report mixed success in employee retention Eighty-two percent of employers are confident they have the right environment and culture to retain their best workers and almost three-quarters report having the right incentives in place. However, more than half report they are struggling to keep their best people from leaving and 71 percent have trouble finding the right people for the right jobs. Employers: Efforts to retain best employees My company/organization generates a work environment and culture that helps to keep our best employees on staff Top 2 Box 42% 41% 14% 4% 82% My company/organization has incentives and programs in place to help retain our talent 32% 40% 16% 11% 73% When positions become available at my company/organization, we sometimes struggle to find talented people who are right for the job 28% 43% 20% 8% 71% My company/organization struggles to keep our best people from leaving 19% 32% 27% 22% 51% Strongly agree Somewhat disagree Somewhat agree Strongly disagree Employer confidence dips around effective decisions for future Employers express slightly lower levels of confidence around their companies leadership and hiring in the second quarter versus first quarter survey results. Specifically, employers are less likely to feel their management is making the right staffing decisions and the right investments in their workforce for the future. Employer attitudes about their organization s future: Trended 90 89 87 86 86 88 74 % Strongly/somewhat agree Our company/organization has a great future. My company/organization is making the right investments now in our workforce for the future. My company/organization is building quality and value in our employees. Our senior management is making the right staffing decisions today to get us where we need to be in the future. My company/organization is hiring the right types of managers who will give the leadership our employees need. As the economy turns the corner, we are reevaluating our hiring processes and needs. Mar 2011 Jun 2011 Q3 Q4 Randstad Employee Attachment Index 8

Optimism about the future prevails but there is room for improvement Both employers and employees are optimistic about the future of their organizations. Employers tend to be more optimistic, while employees are unsure that organizations are hiring the right leaders needed to ensure a successful future. There is an opportunity for employers to close the confidence gap with more communication and engagement, which will translate into higher employee attachment. Employees vs. employers: The future of their organization Our company/organization has a great future 75 88 GAP 13 My company/organization is making the right investments now in our workforce for the future 62 17 My company/organization is building quality and value in our employees 62 21 Our senior management is making the right staffing decisions today to get us where we need to be in the future 59 20 My company/organization is hiring the right types of managers who will give the leadership our employees need 57 26 15 Employees 20 Employers Total % agree Methodology The Randstad Employee Attachment Index is comprised of findings from two waves of research targeting employers and employees. In the first employer wave, a national sample of more than 534 employers was interviewed online in March 2011. In the second wave, 546 employers were interviewed online in June. Participating employers work full-time at a company with at least 50 employers and are involved in hiring decisions. In the first employee wave, a national sample of 1,010 adults who were employed full-time were interviewed online in March. In the second wave, a national sample of 3,436 full-time employed adults were interviewed online. Weighting was used to balance demographics and ensure samples reflect the U.S. population of working adults. Employees and employers were surveyed to compare notable differences in perceptions and attitudes. Two separate waves of research allow for trending and to track changes in perceptions and attitudes over time. Research into employee attitudes and perceptions will be conducted quarterly. Research into employer attitudes and perceptions will be conducted on an annual basis. Randstad Employee Attachment Index 9