Table 1. Soybean sampling stages and cumulative corn heat units (CHU) and rainfall.

Similar documents
Fertility Guidelines for Hops in the Northeast Dr. Heather Darby, University of Vermont Extension Agronomist

Understanding the. Soil Test Report. Client and Sample Identification

LAB 5 - PLANT NUTRITION. Chemical Ionic forms Approximate dry Element symbol Atomic weight Absorbed by plants tissue concentration

Agro-One Soil Analysis

SULFUR AND MICRONUTRIENT RESPONSES ON CORN AND SOYBEANS George Rehm Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St.

WHAT IS IN FERTILIZER OTHER THAN NUTRIENTS?

MICRONUTRIENTS AS STARTER AND FOLIAR APPLICATION FOR CORN AND SOYBEAN

A SOIL TESTING SERVICE FOR FARMERS IN THAILAND, USING MOBILE LABORATORIES

Agronomic and Economic Considerations on Michigan Farms

Evaluation of Biofertilizer and Manure Effects on Quantitative Yield of Nigella Sativa L.

Managing Crops for Excess Water Stress

Soils should be warm and moist for at least a week before SME sampling. Chilean may not be allowed at all after 2012

Soybean Physiology: How Well Do You Know Soybeans?

Soybean roulette: improving the odds for maximizing soybean yields

EFFECT OF AVAIL ON CORN PRODUCTION IN MINNESOTA

K component in recycled NPK fertilizers

FERTILIZER GUIDELINES FOR AGRONOMIC CROPS IN MINNESOTA

Quality requirements for wood ash as K component in recycled NPK fertilizers

Calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) are secondary nutrients, but they are

CALCIUM AND MAGNESIUM: THE SECONDARY COUSINS George Rehm, University of Minnesota

Sulfur deficiency in corn Jim Camberato, Stephen Maloney, and Shaun Casteel 1 Agronomy Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. W. David Smith Extension Crop Science Specialist Tobacco

Hail Damaged Corn and Soybean

Adapt-N Guided Hands-on Exercise

Evaluation of Combination Phosphorus Sulfur Fertilizer Products for Corn Production

Determining nutrient needs

ENERGY IN FERTILIZER AND PESTICIDE PRODUCTION AND USE

FARMING FOR THE FUTURE How mineral fertilizers can feed the world and maintain its resources in an Integrated Farming System

Fertilizing hops improves yield and quality by

The Basics of Fertilizer Calculations for Greenhouse Crops Joyce G. Latimer, Extension Specialist, Greenhouse Crops; Virginia Tech

SOIL TEST LEVELS AND NUTRIENT BUDGETS IN THE WESTERN U.S.

College of Agricultural Sciences Agricultural Research and Cooperative Extension

Nutrient and Fertilizer Value of Dairy Manure

Periodic Table, Valency and Formula

FERTILIZER CALCULATIONS AND PRACTICE QUESTIONS

Grain Sorghum Production South and Southwest Texas

Sulfur Fertilization of Corn. Jeff Vetsch Univ. of Minnesota Southern Research and Outreach Center December 2013

Three Reasons to Broaden Your Fertigation Knowledge

Soil and Leaf Tissue Testing for Commercial Citrus Production 1

Heavy Metals in Cocoa

MATH 110 Landscape Horticulture Worksheet #5

Introduction. Introduction Nutritional Requirements. Six Major Classes of Nutrients. Water 12/1/2011. Regional Hay School -- Bolivar, MO 1

ph is an expression of the concentration of hydrogen ions in solution

Correcting Iron Deficiencies in Soybean with Foliar Iron Fertilizer

PHOSPHORUS, POTASSIUM, AND MINOR ELEMENT FERTILIZATION

The High Plains Dairy Conference does not support one product over another and any mention herein is meant as an example, not an endorsement.

Stoichiometry Review

Understanding Feed Analysis Terminology

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT IMPACTS ON WHEAT YIELD AND PROTEIN. Steve Orloff, Steve Wright and Mike Ottman 1 ABSTRACT

Nutrient Deficiencies

Soybean Growth and Development

Water Quality Management for Greenhouse Production

COTTON WATER RELATIONS

Soil testing is an excellent measure of soil fertility.

Corn Tissue Sampling WHEN AND HOW

Humidtropics Kiboga/Kyankwanzi Soybean production training

You d be mad not to bet on this horse.

POTASSIUM. Functions of Potassium in Plants. Potassium Deficiency Symptoms

Forest Nursery Notes Summer 2009

Making Urea Work in No-till

Bluelab Soil ph Meter Instruction Manual

The Potash Development Association Potash for Cereals

CORN IS GROWN ON MORE ACRES OF IOWA LAND THAN ANY OTHER CROP.

Introduction: Growth analysis and crop dry matter accumulation

Salinity Management and Soil Amendments for Southwestern Pecan Orchards

Strawberry Production Basics: Matted Row

Design of Control System for Measurement of Ph and EC of Fertilizer Solution

SOIL FERTILITY MANAGEMENT BASICS. Organic Soil Amendments and Fertilizers

Nitrogen uptake in cotton+greengram intercropping system as influenced by integrated nutrient management

Coffee Growing Basics: Fertilizer, Disease, Insects. HC Skip Bittenbender Extension Specialist CTAHR/UH

Update on Nitrogen Management Field Studies with Strawberries and Leafy Vegetables

Understanding ph management and plant nutrition Part 5: Choosing the best fertilizer

Long-term studies find benefits, challenges in alternative rice straw management

Nitrogen Fixing Bacteria in Agriculture Now a Real Option Guy Webb B.Sc. REM Agricultural Consultant

Yield Response of Corn to Plant Population in Indiana

Irrigation Water for Greenhouses and Nurseries

Analysis of Organic Fertilizers for Use in Vegetable Transplant Production

CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC. Implementation of Sustainable Agricultural Initiatives

THE KILL DATE AS A MANAGEMENT TOOL TO INCREASE COVER CROPS BENEFITS IN WATER QUALITY & NITROGEN RECYCLING

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AMMONIUM AND NITRATE IN WHEAT PLANT TISSUE AND ESTIMATED NITROGEN LOSS

PUTTING FORAGES TOGETHER FOR YEAR ROUND GRAZING

Water quality can have a huge impact on plant

Chapter 5 Foliar Testing and Sampling in Berry Crops, Visual Symptoms of Deficiencies - Dr. Marvin Pritts, Cornell University

What Is Humic Acid? Where Does It Come From?

Chemical Proportions in Compounds

Maize Seed Production Manual

Nitrogen Management Guidelines for Corn in Indiana

Published 2005 INTRODUCTION

Horticulture Information Leaflet 33-E

NO-TILL AND NITROGEN FIXING INOCULANTS

Tailoring solutions for a region of diversity Global Press Conference 2013

How to read your Oil Analysis Report

Self-Study Course. Continuing Education. Water balance and nitrate leaching under corn in kura clover living mulch

Testing Water for Gardening and Lawn Irrigation

Concepts and Rationale for Regional Nitrogen Rate Guidelines for Corn

THE SCIENCE THE FUTURE OF CANADIAN CANOLA: APPLY THE SCIENCE OF AGRONOMICS TO MAXIMIZE GENETIC POTENTIAL.

IV. PLANT NUTRIENT ELEMENTS

various P levels for the past two years. Treatments were a one time application

Guidelines for Estimating Wheat Straw Biomass Production Costs. Average Crop Residue Zone in Manitoba

1. Overview of VA Roller Demo Project. 2. What Is Cover Crop Rolling? Contacts for VA-USDA Roller Demonstration Project

Transcription:

Nutrient Uptake and Partitioning by Soybeans in Manitoba John Heard, Soils and Crops Branch, Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives jheard@gov.mb.ca Abstract Soybean plants were analysed for nutrient uptake and removal through the growing season. The 45 bu/ac crop took up some 2 lb N/ac and removed 88% in the grain, leaving little residual N for following crops in the surprisingly high C/N ratio leaf, stem and pod material. Typical rate of N, P 2 O 5 and K 2 O uptake during the growing season were 4, 1 and 4 lb/ac/day, respectively. Much K was lost from senescing leaves. Nutrient translocation from vegetative parts to seed was observed for N, P, K, S, Zn and Cu. Introduction Soybeans are increasing in acreage in Manitoba, and the nutritional requirements are different than most other prairie crops in respect to N and K uptake and removal. Many growers have felt that this nitrogen factory would supply following crops with considerable nitrogen, yet recent studies have documented little contribution. Past studies have illustrated soybean nutrient uptake and removal of macronutrients (Hanway and Weber, 1971) and industry standards for crop uptake and removal are available, yet validation under our modest yield environment would be helpful for use in future nutrient management plans. Materials and Methods A field of commercial soybeans was selected near Carman in the south-central area of Manitoba. The soil was moderately well-drained Reinfeld clay loam soil. The full season variety, OAC Prudence, was seeded in 8 rows on May 22, 25. Seed was inoculated and fertilizer applied to supply 4 lb N/ac, 2 lb P 2 O 5 /ac and 2 lb K 2 O /ac. Weeds were controlled with Pursuit Ultra herbicide. To determine nutrient uptake and accumulation, whole plant samples were taken at selected growth stages during the season (Table 1). Sampling was according to a randomized complete block design with 3 replicates. Table 1. Soybean sampling stages and cumulative corn heat units (CHU) and rainfall. Sampling Date Growth stage and description CHUs Precipitation mm 25 Normal 25 Normal y 6 V4 4 th trifoliate leaf 851 891 154 117 y 15 R1 1 st flower 176 111 172 141 y 25 R3 beginning pod formation 1296 1335 27 161 ust 5 R4 full pod, ¾ long pod 1537 1583 215 185 ust 17 R6 full seed size 1774 1842 225 212 tember 28 R8 full maturity 2453 2479 268 289 At sampling the plants were cut at ground level, separated into plant portions (leaf, stem, pods and seed), dried, ground and submitted for full nutrient analysis by AgVise Laboratories, Northwood, ND. At the final sampling date, most leaves had dropped and were collected from the soil surface and rinsed of soil before drying. Phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) levels are converted to the oxide forms (P 2 O 5 and K 2 O) to equate to fertilizer nutrient values. The daily rate of dry matter and nutrient accumulation was determined based on the interval between samplings. At the final harvest, carbon content was determined to determine the 1

C/N ratio for the plant parts. Soil sampling was conducted prior to seeding and following harvest to track nutrient changes. Results and Discussion Corn Heat Unit (CHU) accumulation and rainfall was very similar to that normally expected (Table 1). The greatest crop stress was due to heavy rainfall in mid y. Soybean yield was slightly higher than normal for this northern growing area, with combine harvested yield from the entire field averaging 32 bu/ac. Total dry matter accumulation at harvest was 5959 lb/ac (Figure 1). The grain portion was 2729 lb/ac or 45.5 bu/ac with a harvest index of 46%. The remaining biomass at maturity consisted equally of leaves, stem and pods. Rate of dry matter accumulation was greatest for leaves and stems during mid y between R1 and R3 stages when the plant accumulated 129 lb/ac/day. Leaf biomass was greatest at R4 and declined during seed filling. Very little apportioning of dry matter from the stem and pod to the seed was observed. During seed filling (R6 to R8), the seed accumulated dry matter at 57 lb or almost 1bu/ac/day. Total aerial nitrogen (N) accumulation was 199 lb/ac, with 88% or 176 lb/ac in the grain (Figure 2). Peak accumulation in leaves and stem was 71 and 33 lb N/ac, respectively, at the R4 stage. Between R1 and R4, the plant accumulated nitrogen at 4.3 lb N/ac/day. During seed filling, the seed accumulated N at 3.7 lb N/ac/day, largely translocated from vegetative tissue. Previous Manitoba studies have shown little N benefit of soybeans to following cereal crops (Przednowek et al, 24) and for this 45.5 bu/ac yield potential a N credit of only 5 lb N/ac is offered (www.umanitoba.ca/outreach/fewerchemicals/research/nbenefit.html ). Observations from this study tend to support this very modest contribution. At harvest only 23 lb N/ac remained in leaf, stem and pod tissue being returned to the field and the C/N ratio of plant parts are as follows: 37:1 for leaf, 112:1 for stem, 86:1 for pod and 8:1 for seed. The soil nitrate-n content in the -24 depth decreased from 37 lb N/ac in May to 27 lb N/ac following harvest. Total aerial phosphorus (P) accumulation was 62 lb P 2 O 5 /ac, with 86% or 53 lb P 2 O 5 /ac in the grain (Figure 2). At maturity, P was allocated as follows: 8% in leaves, 4% in stem and 2% in pods. Between V4 and R6, the plant P uptake rate was.96 lb P 2 O 5 /ac/day. Phosphorus is a mobile nutrient in the plant and a general decline in leaf and stem P content occurred during seed filling (R6 to R8) and the seed accumulated P at a rate of 1.1 lb P 2 O 5 /ac/day. Some 1.15 lb P 2 O 5 was removed in each bu of seed produced. Greatest aerial potassium (K) accumulation was 22 lb K 2 O/ac at the R6 stage (Figure 2) with 5% in the leaves, 18% in the stem, 26% in pods and 7% in developing seed. By harvest on tember 28 (R8 stage) a portion of the K had been mobilized to the seed but a greater portion was lost entirely mostly from senescing leaf tissue, presumably through leaching of soluble K. At harvest only 115 lb K 2 O/ac remained. Between V4 and R6, the soybean plant accumulated K at a rate exceeding 4 lb K 2 O/ac/day. Some 1.2 lb K 2 O was removed in each bu of seed produced. Sulphur (S) uptake by the plant was only 13 lb S/ac, with 9 lb S/ac or 72% in grain, 1.8 lb S/ac in leaves,.9 lb S/ac in stem and.7 lb S/ac in pods (Figure 2). Much of the S from leaf tissue appears to be translocated to seed. Calcium (Ca) uptake (113 lb Ca/ac) was much greater than expected, but very little if any was translocated to the seed. Greatest magnesium uptake was 38 lb Mg/ac. At harvest Mg was evenly proportioned among the leaf, stem, pod and seed. 2

Total accumulation of micronutrients was small;.18 lb Zn/ac,.46 lb Mn/ac, 1.36 lb Fe/ac,.5 lb Cu/ac and.25 lb B/ac (Figure 3). Iron (Fe) appeared to increase in uptake during seed fill, however inadvertent soil contamination on fallen leaves probably caused this increase. Zinc and perhaps copper appeared to be show some translocation from leaf tissue to seed. Manganese, Fe and B tended to remain in vegetative tissue. References Hanway, J.J. and C.R. Weber. 1971. Accumulation of N, P, K by Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) Plants. Agron. J. 63:46-48. Przednowek, D.W.A., M.H. Entz, B. Irvine, D.N. Flaten and J.R. Thiessen Martens.24. Rotational yield and apparent N benefits of grain legumes in southern Manitoba. Can. J. Plant Sci. 84:193-196. 3

Dry Matter Accumulation 8 DM lb/ac 6 4 2 Seed Pod Stem Leaf 2 Growth Stage V4 R1 R3 R4 R6 R8 Figure 1. Aerial dry matter accumulation of soybean. Soybean Nitrogen Uptake Soybean Phosphorus Uptake 25 7 2 6 N lb/ac 15 1 5 P2O5 lb/ac 5 4 3 2 1 2 2 Soybean Potassium Uptake Soybean Sulphur Uptake 25 16 2 14 12 K2O lb/ac 15 1 5 S lb/ac 1 8 6 4 2 2 2 4

Soybean Calcium Uptake Soybean Magnesium Uptake 12 4 35 1 3 Ca lb/ac 8 6 4 Mg lb/ac 25 2 15 1 2 5 2 2 Figure 2. Nutrient accumulation by soybeans. Soybean Zinc Uptake Soybean Manganese Uptake.2.5.4.15 Zn lb/ac.1 Mn lb/ac.3.2.5.1.. 2 2 Soybean Iron Uptake Soybean Copper Uptake 1.5.6 1.25.5 Fe lb/ac 1..75.5 Cu lb/ac.4.3.2.25.1. 2. 2 5

Soybean Boron Uptake.3.25.2 B lb/ac.15.1.5. 2 Figure 3. Micronutrient accumulation by soybeans. 6