OECD s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) initiative and the Global Tax Reset Full results of third annual multinational survey.

Similar documents
Global Tax and Legal September OECD s BEPS initiative a global survey Multinational survey results

EMEA TMC client conference Country-by-country reporting. The Crystal, London 9-10 June 2015

OECD Tax Alert. BEPS action 2: Neutralizing the effects of hybrid mismatch arrangements. OECD proposals. International Tax. 16 October 2015.

Spain Tax Alert. Corporate tax reform enacted. Tax rate. Tax-deductible expenses. International Tax. 2 December 2014

HR Business Partnering A Custom Approach

Australia Tax Alert. Budget targets debt funding by multinationals. Thin capitalization rules. International Tax. 15 May 2013.

Stakeholder Engagement

Tax highlights. Key developments this week. 10 November Contents:

Australia Tax Alert. Investment manager regime bill introduced into parliament. Overview of proposed requirements for IMR exemption.

70. Switzerland. Other regulations

Wealth Advisory Services Winning with clients

Saudi Arabia income tax and zakat update Refreshing perspectives

Advance Pricing Agreement Frequently Asked Questions

New United Kingdom Tax on Cross-Border Tax Planning: Diverted Profits Tax

Striking the right balance PwC Budget Seminar 1 March 2013 Transfer pricing plenary

A small country perspective on international taxation

PRIIPs Key Investor Documents The new reporting challenge

BEPS ACTIONS Revised Guidance on Profit Splits

FSB: Reinsurance Regulatory Review Summary of Discussion Paper

Japan: Inbound Tax Alert 2015 Tax Reform Proposals - Announced

Service Organization Control (SOC) Reports Focus on SOC 2 Reporting Standard

Global Transfer Pricing Review

Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) Date: /08/15 Type of measure: Subordinate Legislation Lead department or agency: Department for Social Development

Clear, transparent reporting The new auditor s report

Wealth Advisory Services Winning with clients

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. on tax transparency to fight tax evasion and avoidance

Corporate tax evasion, avoidance and competition:

Explanatory Statement

Nordea Asset Management. Responsible corporate tax practices

Integrated Business Services (IBS) Next generation of high performance Shared Services. Deloitte Consulting GmbH February 2016

Joint Audit Participants Guide

Tax insights G20 Brisbane and BEPS: Where to from here?

OECD BEPS Project - Impact on UK tax law. Munich, 21 April 2016

Article 26 (Exchange of Information) of the Protocol to the Double Tax Treaty between Cyprus and Russia

Sample risk committee charter

Communications Manager

International Forum of Independent Audit Regulators Report on 2014 Survey of Inspection Findings March 3, 2015

Hong Kong * 505 IBFD. * Contributed by Ying Zhang, IBFD.

13. PE & CF Conference Challenges of BEPS for PE Managers and Funds

Sweden: The Social Security Agreement between Sweden and India will enter into force on the first of August 2014

Revenue Administration: Taxpayer Audit Development of Effective Plans

Implementing a Diverted Profits Tax

Australian business and immigration solutions Planning is your best protection

Take your first steps. to become global professionals 加 入 德 勤 舞 出 成 就 第 一 步. Take your first steps. to becoming global professionals

Is a sustainable tax on international profit feasible? Michael Devereux Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation

Overview of the OECD work on transfer pricing

Risk committee performance evaluation

Appointment of the audit committee and independence requirements

News Flash Hong Kong Tax. November 2015 Issue 10. In brief. In detail.

EMEA TMC client conference Using global tax management systems to improve visibility and enhance control. The Crystal, London 9-10 June 2015

TREATY ENTITLEMENT OF NON-CIV FUNDS

Transfer Pricing Country Summary Japan

IBA Business and Human Rights Guidance for Bar Associations. Adopted by the IBA Council on 8 October 2015

FASB s new qualitative goodwill impairment assessment Implications and opportunities

Transfer Pricing Country Summary Australia

NamCode. The Corporate Governance Code for Namibia

Update on tax policy developments in the OECD (the 'BEPS' initiative) EC (agressive tax planning) and the Dutch response

EU: 2015 Place of Supply Changes Changes to the VAT place of supply for e-services

BEPS within the EU Framework Compatibility and Implementation

BEPS ACTION 8: Public Discussion Draft. REVISIONS TO CHAPTER VIII OF THE TRANSFER PRICING GUIDELINES ON COST CONTRIBUTION ARRANGEMENTS (CCAs)

Is business ready to grow? How human capital and talent technology are influencing global business

2015 Trends & Insights

Insurance Europe response to the EC consultation on the re-launch of the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB)

State Tax Implications of an IRS Audit. Steve Spaletto, Deloitte Tax LLP

BEPS Action 13: Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by-Country Reporting

Bank levy amendments. Detailed proposal. Who is likely to be affected? General description of the measure. Policy objective. Background to the measure

Draft Examples Clause 33: Hybrid and other mismatches

The Use of Social Media by Electronics Design Engineers

Public consultation on further corporate tax transparency

US estate and gift tax rules for resident and nonresident aliens

Centre for Corporate Governance. Managing the business risk of fraud: New guidance for a new risk environment

THE CHANGING ENVIRONMENT FOR TRANSFER PRICING DOCUMENTATION. Action 13 documentation and reporting requirements

Review of Building the Canadian Advantage: a Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy for the Canadian International Extractive Sector

APB ETHICAL STANDARD 5 NON-AUDIT SERVICES PROVIDED TO AUDIT CLIENTS

International IPTV Consumer Readiness Study

The role of the Chairman as well as value of a non executive chairman

The APA Application Process. Intercompany Transfer Pricing

TAX LAWS AMENDMENT (TAX INTEGRITY MULTINATIONAL ANTI-AVOIDANCE LAW) BILL 2015 EXPOSURE DRAFT EXPLANATORY MATERIAL

44. Kazakhstan. Statutory rules

Public consultation on further corporate tax transparency

Tax considerations for Pharmaceutical & Life Sciences Industry 27 November November 2013

Corporate Secretarial Services Your guide to corporate compliance

PwC s 5th Annual Digital IQ Survey

Disclaimer. Page 2. The United States-Canada Tax Regime - Advance Pricing Agreements Competent Authority Resolution, and Arbitration Provision

Chile Tax Alert. Amended tax reform bill approved by Senate. Dual tax system. International Tax. 23 August 2014

35. Hong Kong. International Transfer Pricing 2013/14

Webinar and Marketing Technology Purchase Decision Analysis Prepared for ON24

Risk Considerations for Internal Audit

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

R&D and Government Incentives Tax & Legal. Financial affairs R&D tax relief opportunities for financial services companies

TRANSFER PRICING COMPARABILITY DATA AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

Cross- sell: The growing need to diversify

EU Initiatives Regarding Aggressive Tax Planning Danmarks Skatteadvokater 26. May CORIT

Background and introduction

WELCOME MIKE STRAWSON LEAD ASSOCIATE CHAMBER INTERNATIONAL

TAXREP 01/16 (ICAEW REP 02/16)

Research on tax liability of public sector bodies for profit tax purposes

Tax Analysis. China relaxes foreign exchange procedures on outbound payments. for trade in services. PRC Tax. Tax Issue P184/ July 2013

Perspectives on the Future of Financial Advice (FoFA) Deloitte Deloitte Actuaries & Consultants Limited

Transcription:

OECD s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) initiative and the Global Tax Reset Full results of third annual multinational survey May 2016

OECD s BEPS initiative full results of third annual multinational survey In 2014, Deloitte conducted its first OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) survey to gauge the views of multinational companies regarding the increased media, political and activist group interests in responsible tax and BEPS, and the expected resulting impact on their organizations. More than 600 Deloitte member firm clients and contacts responded to that first survey. In early 2015, a follow-up survey was conducted to understand how participants views on the tax landscape have evolved. Since last year s survey, the OECD has published 13 final reports and an explanatory statement outlining consensus actions under the BEPS project. In 2016 we conducted the survey again, this time after the final OECD BEPS recommendations were announced in October 2015. With the reports published and proposals approved by policy makers, the real work of implementation for companies and tax advisers is just about to begin and this year s 2016 survey responses reflect this changing landscape and resulting Global Tax Reset. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 2

Contents 2016 survey respondents 4 Survey results overall and by country 6 Views on media and political interest 30 Open questions - selected participant responses 33 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 3

2016 survey respondents 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 4

2016 survey respondents RESPONSES BY COUNTRY United States 217 United Kingdom 64 45 38 30 26 22 20 19 18 11 8 8 Other 93 SURVEY RESPONSES The survey was conducted from 27 January 12 February 2016, with a target audience of tax and finance managers and executives from multinational companies. Over 600 people from over 13 countries responded to the 2016 survey. MOST COMMON ROLES 1. Tax Director/Tax VP 326 2. International Tax Manager 99 3. International Tax Director 83 4. Controller/CFO 52 5. Other 59 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 5

Survey results overall and by country 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 6

Question 1 74 agree or strongly agree that their organization is concerned about the increased media, political and activist group interest in corporate taxation. 90 70 50 30 20 10 0 2014 2015 2016 Response Trend /strongly agree responses remained high, but down 6 percentage points from 2015. 2016 My organization is concerned about the increased media, political and activist group interest in corporate taxation. 79 77 70 64 89 73 69 85 77 38 84 63 Note: Percentages refer to participants who selected agree or strongly agree for key countries. Slides 31-32 indicate responses from perspective of respondent s role, industry, type of company and sector. The level of concern remains high but does vary by country. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 7

Question 2 64 agree or strongly agree that the C-Suite and/or Board of Directors has inquired about the increased media and political activist group interest in tax. The C-Suite and/or Board of Directors of my organization have inquired about the increased media and political activist group interest in tax. 66 67 69 75 50 44 20 0 2014 2015 2016 Response Trend /strongly agree responses remained relatively high and increased by 1 percentage point from 2015. 64 36 72 73 73 74 63 These statistics highlight that tax is still high on companies agendas. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 8

Question 3 53 agree or strongly agree that their organization has developed additional corporate policies and procedures in response to the increased scrutiny related to corporate taxation. 48 2016 52 My organization has developed additional corporate policies and procedures in response to the increased scrutiny related to corporate taxation. 63 59 73 75 56 No Yes 20 0 Response Trend 2015 2016 /strongly agree increased slightly (by 3 percentage points) from 2015. 36 50 59 47 58 63 The increase is likely due to increasing thoughtfulness around what the OECD s anti-beps measures mean for stakeholders. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 9

Question 4 92 agree or strongly agree that tax structures implemented today are under greater scrutiny by tax administrations now than they would have been a year ago. 20 0 2014 2015 2016 Response Trend /strongly agree responses remained high, and increased by 1 percentage point from 2015. I believe that tax structures implemented today are under greater scrutiny by tax administrations now than they would have been a year ago. 97 95 91 91 78 96 96 95 87 89 95 88 This is an expected result tax authorities around the world are cooperating more closely and increasing their diligence regarding the audit of taxpayers. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 10

Question 5 55 agree or strongly agree their business has changed the way they conduct tax planning for cross-border transactions as a result of proposed changes arising from the BEPS project. (question not asked in 2014) My business has changed the way we conduct tax planning for cross-border transactions as a result of proposed changes from the BEPS project. 63 58 54 75 50 44 20 0 2015 2016 Strongly Neither nor Strongly Response Trend 61 55 28 41 27 47 63 /strongly agree responses increased 11 percentage points from 2015. This is an unsurprising increase on last year as more of the BEPS changes have come into force and more companies are implementing in house tax strategies. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 11

Question 6 59 agree or strongly agree that tax planning in their organization has become a corporate responsibility issue, not just a legal issue. 20 0 2014 2015 2016 Response Trend /strongly agree responses remained high, and increased slightly (by 1 percentage point) from 2015. In my organization, tax planning has become a corporate responsibility issue and not just a legal issue. 84 49 53 73 67 55 50 65 57 50 53 75 As last year, the percentage of respondents who regard tax as a corporate responsibility issue varies significantly by country. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 12

Question 7 75 agree or strongly agree that reputational risks are of much greater concern when executing cross-border tax planning. 20 0 2014 2015 2016 Response Trend /strongly agree responses remained high, and increased slightly (by 1 percentage point) from 2015. Reputational risks are of much greater concern when executing cross-border tax planning. 87 68 75 82 78 68 81 90 70 38 87 95 63 This result remained largely static which is not surprising given last year s high level of concern regarding reputational risk in the context of cross-border tax planning. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 13

Question 8 79 agree or strongly agree their organization has assessed the potential impact of changes related to BEPS. My organization has assessed the potential impact of changes related to BEPS. 74 88 81 85 75 67 20 55 0 2014 2015 2016 Response Trend /strongly agree responses remained high and increased significantly (by 10 percentage points) from 2015. 77 89 91 97 90 75 The number of respondents who have now assessed the potential impact of the BEPS changes on their business has increased since last year. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 14

Question 9 52 agree or strongly agree that country tax authorities are becoming increasingly aggressive in tax examinations. 20 0 2014 2015 2016 Response Trend /strongly agree responses decreased notably (by 5 percentage points) from 2015. In my country of residence, the tax authorities are becoming increasingly aggressive in tax examinations. 79 43 39 73 72 27 23 25 63 38 67 63 50 The slight decrease in agreement to this statement may reflect the fact that the tax authorities have already set the bar very high in this area. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 15

Question 10 94 agree or strongly agree that tax authorities will, irrespective of any actual legislative changes, increase tax audit assessments globally as a result of the current BEPS debate. 20 0 2014 2015 2016 Response Trend /strongly agree responses remained high, and increased (by 4 percentage points) from 2015. Irrespective of legislative changes I believe that tax authorities will increase tax audit assessments globally as a result of the current BEPS debate. 97 95 91 95 95 93 88 89 88 The slight increase of countries who agree is expected as the general BEPS debate continues. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 16

Question 11 63 agree or strongly agree they are anticipating significant legislative and treaty changes in their country as a result of the BEPS initiative. 20 0 2014 2015 2016 Response Trend /strongly agree responses increased significantly (by 7 percentage points) from 2015. In my country, I am anticipating significant legislative and treaty changes as a result of the BEPS initiative. 53 45 86 91 56 77 81 85 67 88 62 42 63 This increase in the percentage of people who agree is expected as the BEPS changes start to come into effect. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 17

Question 12 49 agree or strongly agree there will be significant unilateral legislative change in their country to protect the tax base that is not coordinated with what other countries are doing. 20 0 2014 2015 2016 Response Trend /strongly agree responses decreased meaningfully (by 6 percentage points) from 2015. In my country, I am anticipating significant unilateral legislative change to protect the tax base that is not coordinated with what other countries are doing. 53 51 66 73 6 45 35 67 38 45 16 50 Unilateral legislative changes will undermine the effectiveness of this global initiative unless the changes are ultimately aligned with the final BEPS recommendations. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 18

Question 13 agree or strongly agree that double taxation will occur as a result of unilateral tax law changes. 20 0 2014 2015 2016 Response Trend /strongly agree responses remained high and strongly increased (by 5 percentage points) from 2015. I believe that double taxation will occur as a result of unilateral tax law changes. 55 84 78 91 67 91 77 75 38 89 90 88 This is unsurprising as unilateral tax changes that are not coordinated with what other countries are doing can create the possibility of double taxation. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 19

Question 14 75 agree or strongly agree that double taxation will arise from some of the BEPS changes even without unilateral legislative changes. (question not asked in 2014) 20 I believe that double taxation will arise from some of the BEPS changes even without unilateral legislative changes. 55 74 82 69 50 84 0 2015 2016 72 73 70 95 88 Response Trend /strongly agree responses remained high but decreased by 4 percentage points from 2015. The decrease in agreement by 5 may show a slight increase in confidence that the anti BEPS proposals will not create inadvertent double taxation. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 20

Question 15 92 agree or strongly agree the BEPS initiative will result in significant legislative and treaty changes in many countries. 20 0 2014 2015 2016 Response Trend /strongly agree responses remained very high and increased (by 5 percentage points) from 2015. In my view, globally, the BEPS initiative will result in significant legislative and treaty changes in many countries. 92 93 97 91 94 96 89 90 82 88 This high percentage accurately reflects the current landscape. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 21

Question 16 68 agree or strongly agree that many countries will change their tax treaties through the multilateral instrument. (question not asked in 2014 or 2015) 13.1 0.3 6.1 25.4 I believe that many countries will change their tax treaties through the multilateral instrument. 53 64 58 70 62 55 55.1 73 50 82 74 75 63 It will be interesting to see how much agreement can be reached between countries. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 22

Question 17 21 agree or strongly agree that most tax administrations will interpret the proposed changes to the Transfer Pricing Guidelines in a consistent manner. (question not asked in 2014 or 2015) 18.7 2.1 13.1 I believe that most tax administrations will interpret the proposed changes to the Transfer Pricing Guidelines in a consistent manner. 26 20 12 25 50 29 16.6 27 49.5 10 22 9 16 0 13 Interestingly companies seem to have little confidence that the interpretation of the BEPS transfer pricing proposals will be consistently applied. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 23

Question 18 95 agree or strongly agree that greater scrutiny will be applied by tax authorities surrounding the level of substantive business operations conducted in low tax countries as a result of the BEPS initiatives in the future. Greater scrutiny will be applied by tax authorities surrounding the level of substantive business operations conducted in low tax countries as a result of the BEPS initiatives in the future. 92 97 96 90 89 20 0 2014 2015 2016 98 95 90 88 Response Trend /strongly agree responses remained extremely high, increasing by 1 percentage point from 2015. It is unsurprising that companies believe that their tax affairs will be scrutinized more carefully in the coming months/years. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 24

Question 19 93 agree or strongly agree the corporate tax compliance burden will substantially increase as a result of the additional transfer pricing reporting requirements from the OECD BEPS recommendations. 20 0 2014 2015 2016 Response Trend /strongly agree responses remained very high, increasing by 2 percentage points from 2015. In my view, the corporate tax compliance burden will substantially increase as a result of the additional transfer pricing reporting requirements from the OECD BEPS recommendations. 97 94 92 95 88 95 97 88 91 88 This is not a surprising result due to the increased disclosure requirements arising from BEPS. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 25

Question 20 68 agree or strongly agree that the corporate tax compliance burden will substantially increase as a result of an increase in the number of foreign permanent establishments resulting from the OECD BEPS recommendations. (question not asked in 2014 or 2015) 0 19.1 7.1 24.7 In my view, the corporate tax compliance burden will substantially increase as a result of an increase in the number of foreign permanent establishments resulting from the OECD BEPS recommendations. 66 73 58 65 63 49.1 65 64 56 64 74 75 This suggests that a significant proportion of survey participants do not have untaxed PEs within their structures. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 26

Question 21 47 agree or strongly agree that the BEPS project will have a greater impact on their organization than they originally thought, based on the OECD s final BEPS reports issued in October 2015. (question not asked in 2014) 20 0 2015 2016 Response Trend /strongly agree responses decreased significantly (by 11 percentage points) from 2015. Based on the OECD s final BEPS reports issued in October 2015 I think the BEPS project will have a greater impact on my organization than I originally thought. 37 52 44 64 39 27 31 45 37 25 49 47 25 The decrease may reflect greater awareness of the BEPS project changes in comparison to last year. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 27

Question 22 38 said their organization considered the recent State Aid cases initiated by the European Commission in implementing tax structures. (question not asked in 2014) Country-specific yes responses 90 70 50 30 20 10 0 2015 2016 Yes No Not applicable Has your organization considered any of the recent State Aid cases initiated by the European Commission in implementing tax structures? 47 51 41 36 44 50 27 27 13 9 21 38 Yes. While not part of the BEPS project, this is an area that has also attracted a lot of attention. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 28

Question 23 26 said their organization is planning on securing additional resources/headcount for their Tax Group wholly or partly as a result of the anticipated changes arising due to the BEPS initiative. (question not asked in 2014) 90 70 50 30 20 10 0 2015 2016 Yes No Country-specific yes responses Is your organization planning on securing additional resources/headcount for your Tax Group wholly or partly as a result of the anticipated changes arising due to the BEPS initiative? 24 25 20 27 11 27 35 30 17 38 22 32 38 Yes. This increase in this percentage from last year is expected perhaps due to enactment of the OECD proposals. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 29

Views on media and political interest 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 30

Question 1: My organization is concerned about the increased media, political and activist group interest in tax. By role in the organization By type of industry or agree 58 (70 in 2015) Controller/CFO 75 (81 in 2015) Tax Director/Tax VP 74 ( in 2015) Overall 77 (84 in 2015) Telecom/Media/ Technology 73 (86 in 2015) Consumer Business 82 (87 in 2015) Health Care & Life Sciences 78 (85 in 2015) Financial Services 66 (73 in 2015) Manufacturing & Engineering 81 (90 in 2015) Energy & Resources The survey shows a good mix of respondents from different roles within their organization. 74 ( in 2015) Overall Interestingly these industry sectors are showing a decline in their concern about the increased interest in tax. Note: See slide 7 for responses analyzed by country 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 31

Question 1: My organization is concerned about the increased media, political and activist group interest in tax. Public vs. private By transaction focus Strongly or 77 (82 in 2015) Public 65 (71 in 2015) Private 74 ( in 2015) Overall 73 (78 in 2015) Business-to-business (B2B) 79 (87 in 2015) Business-to-consumer (B2C) 74 ( in 2015) Overall Reputational risk still appears to be of greater concern for public companies. The B2B sector is now closer aligned with the B2C sector in terms of concern regarding their reputational risk, although both sectors have seen a decline in this concern compared with last year. Note: See slide 7 for responses analyzed by country 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 32

Open questions - selected participant responses 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 33

Question 24: What are your main concerns, if any, about Responsible Tax and the BEPS initiative? Inconsistent treatment by taxing authorities resulting in double taxation. Media and activist misrepresentation and uninformed views amongst the general public. Increased time, cost and resources required to meet additional compliance requirements in different countries as well as dealing with increased queries, etc. from tax authorities. The different interpretation by different countries of what Responsible Tax is. Data sharing and related confidentiality which may end up in misuse of the data shared with tax authorities. Note: 278 respondents answered Q24. The comments listed are representative of the most commonly stated responses. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 34

Question 25: What do you think will be the main hurdles, if any, to achieving cooperation between countries in implementing the OECD s BEPS recommendations? Each major country will apply a self-interest approach, and often adopts a different type of tax regime. Bilateral measures will be difficult to negotiate, and therefore likely that there will be significant unilateral action that will undermine the BEPS initiatives. Even assuming that the rules are similar (big assumption), the attitude of [tax authority] auditors executing the rules will be a big determination on how much pain taxpayers face. BEPS recommendations and media coverage start from the assumption that most taxpayers are not abiding by the rules, which will only embolden the auditors to be more aggressive. How the governments will interpret the recommendations and be applied in a consistent manner where it will not result in any form of double taxation to the taxpayer. Note: 299 respondents answered Q25. The comments listed are representative of the most commonly stated responses. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 35

Question 26: Based on the OECD s final BEPS reports issued in October 2015, what will be the most significant areas of change for your business? Transfer pricing documentation compliance burden. Transfer pricing related issues and managing challenges around permanent establishment. Provision of cross border services, with increases in personnel and activities in different locations to support the taxable profit allocations. Business will not substantially change, but corporate tax compliance burden will increase as a result of OECD's BEPS recommendations. Hybrids, Interest Deductibility, TP documentation and CbyC Reporting. Note: 301 respondents answered Q26. The comments listed are representative of the most commonly stated responses. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 36

Question 27: What has surprised you about the OECD s final BEPS reports issued in October 2015? The fact that they actually completed the work according to their timeline. That they were actually published when they said they would be! There clearly is a lot more to come but the OECD have delivered something. Blatant disregard for double taxation prevention. The very few areas of clear agreement between the countries only 4 minimum standards. Note: 219 respondents answered Q27. The comments listed are representative of the most commonly stated responses. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 37

Question 28: How is your organization responding to BEPS (e.g.; Monitoring the situation? Assessing and quantifying the impact? Implementing structural/financing changes? Doing the work in-house? Engaging external advisors?) We are monitoring the situation and beginning to assess and quantify the impacts. We've made no decisions to implement structural/financing changes. However, it is highly likely that changes will be made. We will do most of the work in-house but will engage external advisors to make sure we are "in line" with others with similar business profile, etc. Implementing changes. Training colleagues to prepare them for expected changes in the business. Most of the work is done in-house. For complex situations, we engage specialized external advisors. Risk assessment tools may help to understand grey areas. We have already implemented financing structure changes; we have assessed impact of CbyCR in-house and are building project team with assistance of outside advisors; considering purchase and implementation of specific software to use for CbyC reporting. We are doing a gap analysis to determine our needs and reaching out to external advisors to understand the practical solutions to the issues facing MNCs. Assessing and quantifying impact. Prompting review of global structure and TP framework. Mix of inhouse and external advisor support. Note: 314 respondents answered Q28. The comments listed are representative of the most commonly stated responses. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 38

Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a private company limited by guarantee ( DTTL ), its network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL (also referred to as Deloitte Global ) does not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about for a more detailed description of DTTL and its member firms. Deloitte provides audit, consulting, financial advisory, risk management, tax and related services to public and private clients spanning multiple industries. Deloitte serves four out of five Fortune Global 500 companies through a globally connected network of member firms in more than 150 countries bringing world-class capabilities, insights, and high-quality service to address clients most complex business challenges. To learn more about how Deloitte s approximately 225,000 professionals make an impact that matters, please connect with us on Facebook, LinkedIn, or Twitter. This communication contains general information only, and none of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, its member firms, or their related entities (collectively, the Deloitte Network ) is, by means of this communication, rendering professional advice or services. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your finances or your business, you should consult a qualified professional adviser. No entity in the Deloitte Network shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies on this communication. 2016. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited.