ISO/HL7 10781 EHR System Functional Model Standard



Similar documents
HL7 EHR System Functional Model and Standard (ISO/HL ), Release 2

HL7 EHR System Functional Model and Standard

HL7 Electronic Health Record System (EHR-S) Functional Model and Standard

Health Level Seven Records Management & Evidentiary Support (RM-ES) Supporting Clinical Documentation for Legal and Billing Purposes

HL7 EHR-System for a Pharmacist/ Pharmacy Electronic Health Record Implementation Guide for Community Practice

HL7 PHR System Functional Model

Private Circulation Document: IST/35_07_0075

HL7 EHR-S Records Management & Evidentiary Support Functional Profile

HL7 Personal Health Record System Functional Model and Standard & Industry Update

Relationship of HL7 EHR System Draft Standard to X12N

From HITSP to HL7 EHR System Function and Information Model (EHR-S FIM) Release 3.0 Interoperability Specifications a Ten Year Journey

This document is a preview generated by EVS

EHR Standards Landscape

HL7 and Meaningful Use

Health informatics HL7 Electronic health record system functional model, release 1

Functional Profile Starter Pack based on HL7 EHR System Functional Model Release 2 (EHRS FM) 7 March 2014

Data Provenance. Functional Requirements Document: Developed in Response to the Data Provenance Task Force Recommendations. Version 1.

HL7 EHR System Functional Model. Draft Standard for Trial Use. July, Editors:

Meaningful Use. NextGen Ambulatory EHR Path to. At NextGen Healthcare, we are ready to help. you demonstrate Meaningful Use.

HL7 & Meaningful Use. Charles Jaffe, MD, PhD CEO Health Level Seven International. HIMSS 11 Orlando February 23, 2011

Value Proposition of EHR System Functional Model (EHRS-FM) US-Realm Profile with DoD and VA Sub-Profiles

Structured Data Capture (SDC) The Use of Structured Data Capture for Clinical Research

Guide To Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use HL7 Version 2

HI-1018: The Electronic Health Record

December Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program Report on Health Information Technology (HIT) and Transparency

Data Integrity in an Era of EHRs, HIEs, and HIPAA: A Health Information Management Perspective

Standardization of the Australian Medical Data Exchange Model. Michael Legg PhD

EHR System Function and Information Model (EHR-S FIM) Release 2.1 HL7 Project ID# 688

FHIM Model Content Overview

Sharing EHR data between NF, MD, & LTC pharmacy using CMS standard messages

Health Care Information System Standards

Service Functional Models (SFMs) and their relationship to the Electonic Health Record System Functional Model (EHR-S FM)

Health IT Enabled Quality Measurement and Improvement: The HL7 Clinical Quality Information Workgroup

Eligible Professionals please see the document: MEDITECH Prepares You for Stage 2 of Meaningful Use: Eligible Professionals.

ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS. Nonfederal Efforts to Help Achieve Health Information Interoperability

Interoperability Testing and Certification. Lisa Carnahan Computer Scientist Standards Coordination Office

Care360 EHR Frequently Asked Questions

THE STIMULUS AND STANDARDS. John D. Halamka MD

HIPAA for HIT and EHRs. Latest on Meaningful Use and EHR Certification: For Privacy and Security Professionals

CDA for Common Document Types: Objectives, Status, and Relationship to Computer-assisted Coding

MEANINGFUL USE. Community Center Readiness Guide Additional Resource #13 Meaningful Use Implementation Tracking Tool (Template) CONTENTS:

What GI Practices Need to Know About the Electronic Health Record Incentive Program. Joel V. Brill, MD, AGAF Lawrence R. Kosinski, MD, MBA, AGAF

TEST INSTRUCTIONS FOR CROSS VENDOR EXCHANGE TABLE OF CONTENTS

Understanding Meaningful Use with a Focus on Testing the HL7 V2 Messaging Standards

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Certification: A Guide for EHR Product Managers

EHR Software Feature Comparison

How to Achieve Meaningful Use with ICANotes

The Big Picture: IDNT in Electronic Records Glossary

New York ehealth Collaborative. Health Information Exchange and Interoperability April 2012

Component 6 - Health Management Information Systems. Objectives. Purpose of a Patient (medical) Record. Unit 3-1 Electronic Health Records

HL7 and Service-oriented Architecture (SOA) Ambassador Briefing

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Focus on Stage 2. Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator

The value MIE delivers can be summed up in two words:

How To Align With Common Ground And Shared In A Cloud Computing Environment

Health Level Seven International Unlocking the Power of Health Information

International HL7 Interoperability Conference - IHIC 2010

Data Breach, Electronic Health Records and Healthcare Reform

Setting the World on FHIR

2011 AHIMA Curriculum Competencies and Knowledge Clusters - Health Information Management Baccalaureate Degree Effective August, 2011

AHIMA Curriculum Map Health Information Management Baccalaureate Degree Approved by AHIMA Education Strategy Committee February 2011

HL7 and Meaningful Use

Enabling Patients Decision Making Power: A Meaningful Use Outcome. Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

HIMSS Interoperability Showcase 2011

HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY*

International Organization for Standardization TC 215 Health Informatics. Audrey Dickerson, RN MS ISO/TC 215 Secretary

Transcription:

ISO/HL7 10781 EHR System Functional Model Standard Presented by: Gary Dickinson Director, Healthcare Standards CentriHealth Co-Chair, HL7 EHR Work Group Lead, S&I Framework Cross-Initiative Simplification Work Group Ambassador Briefing March 2013

The Drivers International Focus on -EHR System Functionality -EHR System(/Record) Interoperability Concerns about privacy/security, cost, quality, operational efficiency and data/record integrity By many stakeholders Healthcare providers Consumers Government Employers

The Need Complete patient health record, trusted record management Starting at: Point of service, point of care, Point of EHR record entry (origination) Continuing to: All subsequent points of EHR record access and use

EHRS FM within HL7 Family Health Level Seven (HL7) is an ANSI-Accredited international Standards Development Organization (SDO) The term HL7 is often used synonymously for the HL7 organization and the HL7 messaging standard HL7 standards have multiple foci: 1. Healthcare-related data/information/routing Standards: Messaging Standards (V2.x and V3) Document Standards (CDA) 2. Healthcare-related Functional Standards (EHR-S FM) 3. Other Standards (Mobile Health, CCOW, Vocabulary, Security, Healthcare Devices ) HL7 2012

How It Started Request from US Government April, 2003: CMS asked Institutes of Medicine (IOM) for guidance on care delivery functions IOM & HL7 to coordinate development of a functional model for an EHR system, not a transaction standard Need: Pay for performance Sponsors: HHS ASPE, VA, HIMSS, RWJ Foundation April, 2003: HL7 EHR WG began work on EHR-S FM July, 2004: Approved as a draft standard for trial use (DSTU)

From DSTU to ANSI/ISO/CEN February 2007: Release 1.0 approved as a fully American National Standards Institute (ANSI) accredited standard November 2009: Release 1.1 approved as a International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard Three way joint ballot between: HL7, ISO TC215, CEN TC251 April 2013: Release 2.0 continues 2 nd round ballot as normative international standard Six way joint ballot between: HL7, ISO TC215, CEN TC251, IHTSDO, CDISC and GS1.

EHR EHR vs. EHR-S The underlying single, logical patient record The data objects and elements comprising the record Serving as the record of care for clinical, operations/business legal and disclosure purposes EHR-S Software that provides functionality to: Manage and maintain the record Accomplish the various clinical, business, research and other purposes of the EHR record May be single monolithic system or a system of systems

EHR System Functional Model Is Not A messaging specification An EHR design specification An implementation specification (not the how ) Does not prescribe technology Does not dictate how functions must be implemented (e.g., via the user interface, database design) Is A system specification An EHR system specification A reference list of functions that may be present in an EHR-S (the what and why ) Enables consistent expression of functionality Provides flexibility for innovation and product differentiation Gold standard, sensitive to what can practically be done by a system, future system development

Standards Plus Strategy Meets applicable certification criteria Capabilities beyond certification criteria could be specified by the EHR-S FM

Functional Model Scope Defines a standardized model of the functions that may be present in EHR Systems. Makes no distinction regarding implementation. Does not address whether the EHR-S is a system-ofsystems or a single system providing the functions required by the users. Makes no statement about which technology is used.

EHR System Functional Model Enables consistent expression of functionality Provides a reference list of functions that: May be present in an EHR-S Understandable from a user s perspective Conformance criteria Required criteria: Mandatory (SHALL) Optional criteria: Two levels (SHOULD, MAY)

EHR System Functional Profiles The EHR-S FM R.1.1 contains approx. 160 functions and 1000 conformance criteria across 3 sections HL7 EHR System Functional Model Functional Profiles (Care Setting) Ancillary Profiles (Specific Purpose) Functional and ancillary profiles are subsets derived from the FM. EHR systems conform to profiles. Emergency Long Term and Post Acute Care Behavioral Health Child Health Records Management & Evidentiary Support (RM-ES) Vital Records Clinical Research

Functional Model Conformance EHR System Functional Model (EHR-S FM) Child Health FP RM&ES FP Derived FP 1 Child Health Conforms to RM&ES Derived FP 2 DC 1.1, CC 3. SHALL DC 1.1, CC 4 SHOULD To develop a robust, yet flexible FM Country 1 DC 1.1, CC3: SHALL DC 1.1, CC4: SHOULD Country 2 LTPAC FP DC 1.1, CC 3: SHALL DC 1.1, CC 4: SHOULD LTPAC FP DC 1.1, CC 3: SHALL DC 1.1, CC 4: SHALL C 2 LTPAC FP LTPAC Conforms to RM&ES Child Health FP DC 1.1, CC 3: SHALL DC 1.1, CC 4: SHALL DC 1.1, CC 3: SHALL DC 1.1, CC 4: SHALL Derived FP 1

Additional Functional Profiles US Meaningful Use/EHR Incentive Program (new) EHR System Usability (pending) Dietetics/Food & Nutrition (jointly with ADA) Public Health (jointly with CDC) E-Prescribing (jointly with NCPDP) Pharmacist/Pharmacy (jointly with NCPDP) Dentistry (jointly with ADA)

Functional Model & Certification Function ID 1.0 HL7 EHR-S Standard Function Product Certification Conformance Criteria Certification Year Certification Criteria No. Clause 2008 2009 2010 1.1 ABC 1 SHALL.. SHALL.. X 2 SHOULD.. SHALL.. X 3 SHALL.. SHALL.. X 4 MAY.....(Did not adopt) 5 SHOULD.. SHALL.. X 6 SHALL.. SHALL.. X Granularity: Individual conformance criterion may be certified in a year different from other criteria in the same function Dependent on essential now vs. future, market availability, & priority for improving quality of care

EHR-S Functional Model at a Glance EHR System Functional Model Functions describe the behavior of a system in useroriented language so as to be recognizable to the key stakeholders of an EHR System This represents the Release 1.1 Structure

Structure of the Functional Model ID# Name Statement/Description See Also Conformance Criteria DC.1.1.1 Identify and Maintain a Patient Record Statement: Identify and maintain a single patient record for each patient. Description: A single record is needed for legal purposes, as well as to organize it unambiguously for the provider. Health information is captured and linked to the patient record. Static data elements as well as data elements that will change over time are maintained. The patient is uniquely identified, after which the record is tied to that patient. Combining information on the same patient, or separating information where it was inadvertently captured for the wrong patient, helps maintain health information for a single patient. In the process of creating a patient record, it is at times advantageous to replicate identical information across multiple records, so that such data does not have to be reentered. For example, when a parent registers children as new patients, the address, guarantor, and insurance data may be propagated in the children s records without having to re-enter them. S.1.4.1 S.2.2.1 S.3.1.2 S.3.1.5 IN.2.1 IN.2.3 1. The system SHALL create a single logical record for each patient. 2. The system SHALL provide the ability to create a record for a patient when the identity of the patient is unknown. 3. The system SHALL provide the ability to store more than one identifier for each patient record. 4. The system SHALL associate key identifier information (e.g., system ID, medical record number) with each patient record. 5. The system SHALL provide the ability to uniquely identify a patient and tie the record to a single patient. 6. The system SHALL provide the ability, through a controlled method, to merge or link dispersed information for an individual patient upon recognizing the identity of the patient. 7. IF health information has been mistakenly associated with a patient, THEN the system SHALL provide the ability to mark the information as erroneous in the record of the patient in which it was mistakenly associated and represent that information as erroneous in all outputs containing that information.

Inputs to Release 2.0 (R2). Vital Reports Records Mgmt Behavioral Long-Term Care Alignment Lifecycle Interop Model. Provider Based PHR-S FM & Profiles SOA SAIF R1.1 Adjustments, Enhancements EHR-S Profiles EHR-S FM Release 2.0 Privacy, Security, Confidentiality Other Industry Initiatives Certification (CCHIT, Q-Rec) Health Info Exchange Data Use Fraud Mgt Quality Rev Cycle International Stds (ISO TC215, ISO 20514, 18307, 18308, 13606, 21089 Others

R1.1 R2 Chapter Reorganization Direct Care (DC) Supportive (S) Information Infrastructure (IN) Care Provision Support (CP) Overarching (O) Care Provision (CP) Population Health Support (POP) Record Infrastructure (RI) Trust Infrastructure (TI) Administrative Support (AS)

Extension of Functions/Criteria HL7 EHR-S Functional Model, Release 2 Summary Breakdown of Functions and Conformance Criteria Release 1 Release 1.1 Chapter Functions Conformance Criteria OV Overarching Criteria 2 33 CP Care Provision 41 494 CPS Care Provision Support 76 559 POP Population Health Support 18 108 AS Administration Support 55 249 RI Records Infrastructure 37 186 TI Trust Infrastructure 93 681 Conformance Criteria Conformance Criteria TOTALS: 322 2,310 972 983

Care Provision Focus on functions required to provide care to a specific patient and enable hands-on delivery of healthcare Organized in general order of an encounter Care Provision CP.1 CP.2 CP.3 CP.4 CP.5 CP.6 CP.7 CP.8 CP.9 Manage Clinical History Render Externally-sourced Information CP.1 CP.1.1 Manage Clinical Documentation Manage Orders CP.1.2 Manage Results CP.1.3 Manage Treatment Administration CP.1.4 CP.1.5 Manage Future Care CP.1.6 Manage Patient Education & Communication Manage Care Coordination & Reporting CP.1.7 CP.1.8 Example child functions: Manage Clinical History Manage Patient History Manage Allergy, Intolerance and Adverse Reaction List Manage Medication List Manage Problem List Manage Strengths List Manage Immunization List Manage Medical Equipment, Prosthetic/Orthotic, Device List Manage Patient and Family Preferences

Care Provision Support Focus on functions required to support the provision of care to a specific patient to enable hands-on delivery of healthcare Organized to align with Care Provision chapter Care Provision Support CPS.1 CPS.2 CPS.3 CPS.4 CPS.5 CPS.6 CPS.7 CPS.8 CPS.9 Example child functions: Record Management Support Externally-sourced CPS.4 Information Support Orders Support Clinical Documentation CPS.4.1 Manage Order Set Templates Support Orders CPS.4.2 Support Medication & Immunization Orders CPS.4.2.1 Support for Medication Interaction & Allergy Checking Support Results CPS.4.2.2 Support for Patient Specific Dosing and Warnings Support Treatment Administration CPS.4.2.3 Support for Medication Ordering Efficiencies Support Future Care CPS.4.2.4 Support for Medication Recommendations Support Patient Education & CPS.4.3 Communication Support for Non-Medication Ordering Support Care Coordination CPS.4.4 & Reporting Support Orders for Diagnostic Tests CPS.4.5 Support Orders for Blood Products and Other Biologics

Population Health Support Population Health Support POP.1 Focus Support on input for Health to systems Maintenance, that Preventive perform Care and medical Wellness research, promote POP.2 public Support health, for Epidemiological & improve Investigations the quality of Clinical of care Health at a Within multi-patient a Population level POP.3 POP.4 POP.5 POP.6 POP.7 POP.8 POP.9 POP.10 Example child functions: Support for Notification and Response Support for Monitoring Response Notifications Regarding a Specific Patient s Health Donor Management Support Measurement, Analysis, Research and Reports Public Health Related Updates De-Identified Data Request Management Support Consistent Healthcare Management of Patient Groups or Populations Manage Population Health Study-Related Identifiers POP.6 POP.6.1 POP.6.2 POP.6.3 POP.6.4 Measurement, Analysis, Research and Reports Outcome Measures and Analysis Performance and Accountability Measures Support for Process Improvement Support for Care System Performance Indicators (Dashboards)

Administrative Support Administration support AS.1 Manage Provider Information AS.2 Manage Patient Demographics, Location and Synchronization AS.3 Manage Personal Health Record Interaction AS.4 Manage Communication AS.5 Manage Clinical Workflow Tasking AS.6 Manage Resource Availability AS.7 Manage Encounter/Episode of Care Management AS.1 Manage Provider Information AS.8 Manage Information Access for Supplemental AS.1.1 Use Manage Provider Registry or Directory AS.9 Manage Administrative Transaction Processing AS.1.2 Manage Provider's Location Within Facility AS.1.3 Provider's On Call Location Example child functions: AS.1.4 Manage Provider's Location(s) or Office(s) AS.1.5 Team/Group of Providers Registry or Directory AS.1.6 Provider Caseload/Panel AS.1.7 Manage Practitioner/Patient Relationships

Record Infrastructure Focus on records, record entries and record management, including R1.1 functions/criteria and key provisions of the RM-ES Functional Profile, EHR Interoperability and Lifecycle Model DSTUs. Record Infrastructure RI.1 RI.2 RI.3 Record Lifecycle and Lifespan Record Synchronization Record Archive and Restore RI.1.1 RI.1.1.1 RI.1.1.2 RI.1.1.3 Record Lifecycle Originate and Retain Record Entry Amend Record Entry Content Translate Record Entry Content RI.1.1.4 Attest Record Entry Content RI.1.1.5 View/Access Record Entry Content Example child functions: RI.1.1.6 RI.1.1.7 RI.1.1.8 Transmit and/or Disclose Record Entries Receive and Retain Record Entries De-identify Record Entries RI.1.1.9 Pseudomynize Record Entries RI.1.1.10 Re-identify Record Entries RI.1.1.11 Extract Record Entry Content

Trust Infrastructure Contains the remaining Release 1.1 Infrastructure functions, including Audit. Trust Infrastructure TI.1 TI.2 TI.3 TI.4 TI.5 TI.6 TI.7 TI.8 TI.9 Security Audit Registry and Directory Services Standard Terminology and Terminology Services TI.1 Security Standards-Based Interoperability TI.1.1 Entity Authentication Business Rules Management TI.1.2 Entity Authorization Workflow Management TI.1.3 Entity Access Control Database Backup and Recovery TI.1.4 Patient Access Management TI.1.5 Non-Repudiation System Management Operations and Performance TI.1.6 Secure Data Exchange TI.1.7 Secure Data Routing Example child functions: TI.1.8 Information Attestation TI.1.9 Patient Privacy and Confidentiality

Next Steps Update R1.1 functional profiles to R2 Create new realm (country)-based profiles Map Functional Model to HL7 messages, documents, data Development of Release 3 Function and Information Model

Want to Know More? Join HL7 Review the HL7 web site Subscribe to HL7 EHR WG list serve Join a Sub-Group: PHR, RM-ES, Interop Join a Functional Profile Team Join our Tuesday Work Group calls 3:00-4:30 PM Eastern www.hl7.org/ehr

HL7 EHR System Functional Model and Standard Q & A