Cornell University Office of Research Integrity and Assurance Human Research Participant Protection Program

Similar documents
UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH AAHRPP Preparation UC Davis Human Research Part IV Criteria for Review. Cindy Gates IRB Administration

University of Hawai i Human Studies Program. Guidelines for Developing a Clinical Research Protocol

Recruitment Dos & Don ts NU IRB Brown Bag Session 2/26/2014

12.0 Investigator Responsibilities

Advertising and Recruitment Guidelines for Research Studies

RESEARCH STUDY PROTOCOL. Study Title. Name of the Principal Investigator

Recruitment of Research Participants. Dorean J. Flores IRB Manager

Using Social Media in Research: Regulatory and IRB Considerations

Submission Date: Project Start Date: Approximate Project End Date:

Understanding Clinical Trial Recruitment Rules

Miami University: Human Subjects Research General Research Application Guidance

Guidance on IRB Continuing Review of Research

Institutional Review Board

Human Research Protection Program Good Clinical Practice Guidance for Investigators Investigator & Research Staff Responsibilities

Principal Investigator and Sub Investigator Responsibilities

State University of New York at Canton Institutional Review Board. Sample Informed Consent Document

Human Subjects Research (HSR) Series

On-Site Compliance Review Administrative Records Checklist OSDE-SES. Completed By:

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) REVIEW FORM FOR PROJECTS USING HUMAN SUBJECTS

Address Co-Principal Investigator Information Co- Principal Investigator Faculty Staff Grad. Student Undergrad. Student

Disclaimer. Objectives 5/30/2016

A Principal Investigator s Guide to Responsibilities, Qualifications, Records and Documentation of Human Research University of Kentucky

Study Protocol Template

AAHRPP DOCUMENT # 84 UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTIONS PROGRAM FORM: NOTIFICATION TO IRB OF EMERGENCY USE OF A TEST ARTICLE

EVALUATION BRIEF Understanding the Institutional Review Board (IRB) January 2008

Institutional Review Board for the Use of Human Subjects in Research GUIDELINES FOR A PROPOSAL NARRATIVE

Instructions for Form: Application for Claim of Exemption

IRB Submissions and Human Subjects Research Compliance. Georgia Health Sciences University

PLEASE BE AWARE that you cannot begin the project until you have received notification that the exemption has been granted.

Nova Southeastern University IRB - Consent Form Checklist Version Date: 02/17/2010

ROLE OF THE RESEARCH COORDINATOR Recruitment of Subjects Best Practices

SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) INVESTIGATOR GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH USING HUMAN SUBJECTS

Revision(s) to an Approved Study Form

Nova Southeastern University Institutional Review Board Policies and Procedures

Model Adoption Protocol For Hospitals

Catherine Jahrsdorfer, RN, BSN Director of Clinical Services USF Health Office of Clinical Research

Clarkson College Institutional Review Board Application Manual

WORLD MEDICAL ASSOCIATION DECLARATION OF HELSINKI Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects

Recruitment for Clinical Research. Ensuring the rights and welfare of participants while encouraging research enrollment

Guidelines for the Use of the Participant Pool

PRE-TEST/POST-TEST FOR THE RESEARCH ETHICS TRAINING CURRICULUM. Please indicate if the following statements are True (T) or False (F).

Match Participation Agreement For Applicants and Programs For the 2015 Main Residency Match

Documentation of the Informed Consent Process. USC Office for the Protection of Research Subjects (OPRS)

Department of the Navy Human Research Protection Program

Document Template #1 Adult/General Informed Consent (Rev. 9/20/2011)

Institutional Review Board for Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Manual for Faculty, Staff, and Student Researchers

Department of Health and Human Services. Final Guidance Document

MRIA CODE OF CONDUCT FOR MARKET AND SOCIAL MEDIA RESEARCH. Appendix E GUIDELINE FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

RECRUITMENT STRATEGIES: WAYS TO FACILITATE RESEARCH

WEBSITE & SOCIAL MEDIA PRIVACY POLICY

AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN

Florida Administrative Code

INFORMED CONSENT FOR EGG DONORS PRACTITIONER S GUIDE TO USING THE MODEL FORM

Health Authority Abu Dhabi. HAAD Standard for the Allocation of Physicians in Residency Training Programs in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi (TANSEEQ)

Human Research Seminar Series: Informed Consent Process & HIPAA Authorization Requirements

SOP 502L: INTERNET/SOCIAL MEDIA-BASED RESEARCH

Ethics and Patient Rights (EPR)

FILLING OUT YOUR HUMAN ETHICS APPLICATION Please consult these specific notes

Professional Standards and Guidelines

Joint Position on the Disclosure of Clinical Trial Information via Clinical Trial Registries and Databases 1 Updated November 10, 2009

The Michigan State University Institute for Health Policy (IHP) is recruiting a sample of office based primary care providers to be interviewed

RE: Human Research Subject Protections Under Multiple Project Assurance (MPA) M- 1073

Social Media Research 101. By: Dorean J. Flores, CIP Manager, North Shore-LIJ IRB

Hamline University Graduate School of Education Human Subjects Research: Non-Exempt (Long) Form

Investigator responsibilities for research conducted under the authority of the UTHSCSA Institutional Review Board (IRB)

IRB 101: HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTION PROGRAM

WORLD MEDICAL ASSOCIATION DECLARATION OF HELSINKI

(1) Purpose and Scope. This rule sets forth department policy as. to certain matters generally affecting public adjusters and public

MIAMI CAREERLINK POSTING POLICIES. Career Services 200 HOYT HALL OXFORD, OH (513)

MRS Regulations for Administering Incentives and Free Prize Draws

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTIONS PROGRAM. DoD/DON-funded Research

Recommendations and Policies Relating to Online Data Collection and Online Data Storage. Xavier University Institutional Review Board

IRB 101: HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTION PROGRAM

Ethical Principles in Clinical Research. Christine Grady Department of Bioethics NIH Clinical Center

2 Applicability: Effective Date: 1/15/2010 Revised: 8/13/2010, 9/10/10, 5/9/14

Patience In Patient Recruitment

Research Ethics Review Committee (WHO ERC)

[Informed Consent Form for ] Name the group of individuals for whom this consent is written. Explanation Example

Evaluation Instrument for Accreditation January 1, 2015

STUDENT PROFESSIONALISM

Branding the Government As An Employer of Choice

NCAA RULES FOR MARKETING AND PROMOTIONS ** ALWAYS REFER TO THE NCAA MANUAL FOR SPECIFIC INFORMATION **

Principles FOR. Practice. for Career Services & Employment Professionals

1. Study title Is the title self explanatory to a layperson? If not, a simplified title should be included.

Ideation Compensation Plan 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS. A. Equal Employment Opportunity Policy 41 C.F.R (a),

Advancing research: a physician s guide to clinical trials

RESEARCH PARTICIPANT INFORMED CONSENT AND PRIVACY AUTHORIZATION FORM

Evaluation Instrument for Accreditation January 1, 2016

Claim of Exemption Form Page 1 of 6

Recruitment and Remuneration of Phase I Subjects May 14, Presented by: Theresa Cummings RN, MS Schulman Associates IRB

[Insert Name and Address of Data Recipient] Data Use Agreement. Dear :

Hiring Procedures and Guidelines

The Study Site Master File and Essential Documents

CONSENT FORM TEMPLATE FOR HUMAN SUBJECTS PARTICIPATING IN RESEARCH

IRB Application for Medical Records Review Request

ACE Section 3 33-[SECTION 3 SUPPORT STRATEGIES]

united heritage advertising guidelines

The following terms are commonly used when discussing compensation terminology.

Patient Handbook on Stem Cell Therapies

Transcription:

1. Subject of Policy & Procedure Cornell University Office of Research Integrity and Assurance Human Research Participant Protection Program SOP 9_: RECRUITMENT AND PAYMENT OF HUMAN PARTICIPANTS The recruitment of human participants for a research study is seen by the IRB as the initial stage of the participant selection and informed consent process. Before the Protocol PI may begin to recruit human participants for a specific study, both the recruitment methods and materials are subject to IRB review and approval. In evaluating the recruitment methods and materials, the IRB will consider (1) the degree of risk and likelihood of benefit to the participants and (2) the protections for participants from coercion or undue influence. The IRB will pay close attention where investigators seek to recruit and enroll themselves, students, employees, or members of vulnerable populations such as children, pregnant women, and educationally or economically disadvantaged persons. One recruitment method is advertising. The IRB defines advertising as "any outreach effort intended to be seen and heard by potential human research participants and designed to encourage them to contact the investigator for further information about a specific study." The following informational communications are not recruitment methods or advertisements subject to IRB review and approval: (1) news stories or interviews that do not provide any recruitment information; and (2) publicity intended for non-participant audiences, such as financial page advertisements directed at investors. IRB review and approval is also not required for general non-study-specific advertising because such materials do not relate to a specific study requiring IRB approval. Such materials would include communications designed to raise awareness and knowledge of human participation in research and providing links to specific participant opportunities. Examples include: (1) general information about being a human research participant, (2) non-study-specific recruitment of a participant pool, and (3) announcements that promote research generally to a community, even if designed to encourage future interest in serving as a research participant. However, if any of these advertisements includes information about specific research protocols, they must be reviewed and approved by the IRB before they can be utilized. 2. Scope of Policy & Procedure This Policy & Procedure applies to all on-going and future human participant research projects conducted by Cornell faculty, staff, or students or by anyone conducting a research activity supported by Cornell or on property maintained by Cornell. 1

3. Terms and Definitions All parties to whom this policy applies (e.g., faculty, students, staff, IRB members) should consult the IRB Glossary at http://www.irb.cornell.edu/glossary/. 4. See Also Affected researchers and employees should also consult: 1. Cornell University Federal Wide Assurance Registration: http://www.irb.cornell.edu/regulations/fwa.htm 2. Cornell IRB SOP 9: Informed Consent Options, Processes, and Documentation: http://www.irb.cornell.edu/policy 5. Regulations Applicable to Recruitment of Human Participants 5.1. 45 CFR 46.111(a)(3), 21 CFR 56.111(a)(3): Criteria for IRB Approval of Research, stating that [s]election of subjects is equitable. In making this assessment the IRB should take into account the purposes of the research and the setting in which the research will be conducted and should be particularly cognizant of the special problems of research involving vulnerable populations, such as children, prisoners, pregnant women, mentally disabled persons, or economically or educationally disadvantaged persons. 6. Permissible Methods for Identifying/Recruiting Participants 6.1. Advertisements: A Protocol PI may advertise for research participants. Advertisements include, but are not limited to, class announcements and sign-ups, newspaper ads, radio ads, bulletin boards, posters, flyers, and emails that are intended to be seen and heard by potential human research participants and designed to encourage them to contact the investigator for further information about a specific study. The Protocol PI must submit exact copies of all advertisements, before using them, to the IRB for review and approval, as part of the protocol application or, if applicable, as a protocol amendment. 6.2. Private Medical Information: The Protocol PI may identify participants from resources such as medical records, clinical databases, patient registries, and psychosocial screening databases. The IRB must review and approve any method of obtaining private health information before the Protocol PI uses it. 6.3. Referring to Research Projects: A Protocol PI may provide physicians, faculty members, or other professionals with general information about a research project and contact information for potential participants to learn more about the project and whether they might be eligible to participate. The IRB must review and approve all materials to be sent by the Protocol PI to the referring physicians, faculty members, or other professionals before the materials are sent. 2

7. Roles and Responsibilities of the Protocol PI in the Recruitment Process 7.1. The Protocol PI may not begin any recruitment measures before he or she receives IRB approval of the recruitment methods and materials. The Protocol PI shall submit such information with the protocol application or via a protocol amendment. Such materials include the final copy of printed advertisements and video and audio recordings. The Protocol PI may submit the wording of an advertisement prior to taping to avoid re-taping necessitated by IRB changes. 7.2. If a Protocol PI modifies a recruitment method or the text or appearance (e.g., change in font size) of an advertisement, he or she must submit an amendment request to the IRB for review and approval before use. Note: Minor modifications, such as updating contact information or changes in basic formatting, may simply receive administrative approval, while more substantive changes may require IRB review and approval. 7.3. Regarding the placement of the recruitment materials, the Protocol PI must inform the IRB of the type of the medium/media (e.g., newspaper) and the target audience (whether the general public or a specific ethnic, gender, or cultural group). If the text of a website ad is identical to text used in flyers or newspaper ads, the Protocol PI needs to provide the IRB only one ad with a statement of how and where the ad will be displayed. 7.4. When recruiting potential research participants, the Protocol PI must consider the risks and ethical aspects of the method of contact, as well as of the research study itself. The Protocol PI should choose the least intrusive and coercive method of recruitment that is consistent with successful research and should explain in the protocol application to the IRB why such a method is appropriate. The Protocol PI should state how he or she will guard against coercion, intrusiveness, and violations of privacy, especially where the potential participant is a member of a vulnerable population (e.g., child, pregnant woman, prisoner). Where the recruitment method involves privileged records or sensitive information, the Protocol PI must also be prepared to explain how breaches in confidentiality will be avoided. The IRB will then decide if the merits of the research, the potential benefits to participants, the risks of the study, and the risks of the recruitment method(s) are in such balance as to allow approval of the recruitment method(s). 7.5. Investigators and other study personnel, including students and referring professionals, may not provide or accept bonus payments from sponsors or from one another as incentives for participant recruitment. 7.6. Payment to Participants: The IRB must determine that payment to participants is appropriate under the circumstances of the study. If so, the Protocol PI must provide all information 3

regarding payment, including the amount and schedule of the payments, in the informed consent documents. The Protocol PI may not make payment contingent on the participant s completing the entire study. Instead, payment to participants must accrue as the study progresses and must be prorated based on the number of study visits, or other comparable milestones, completed by the participant. Bonuses paid for complete participation should be reasonable and not so large as to unduly influence participants to remain in the study when they might otherwise choose to withdraw. For multi-institutional studies, participants at collaborating institutions should be compensated on the same terms for participation, unless different terms have been approved by the Cornell IRB. 8. Content of Advertisements, including Payment Information 8.1. The following are the standard requirements for the content of advertisements: Protocol PI s name and contact information Words that effectively communicate the purpose of the research and summarize the participant selection criteria (e.g., condition, age limits, gender, etc.) Clear indication that the study is for research or investigation, not treatment. Payment Information: If the participants will be paid, advertisements may so state, but they may not unduly emphasize payment or the amount of payment. Advertisements may state that participants will be compensated for their time and travel. 8.2. The IRB may elect to require any of the following elements for advertisements, depending on the risk level and other characteristics of the research study: Location of the research study Duration of the study Time or other commitment required of participants Contact information of the person designated to provide further information about the study Brief, clear description of the benefits of participation (no promises or implications of safety or efficacy) in keeping with what is stated in the informed consent documents Statement that Cornell University is an equal opportunity employer 4

9. Direct Contact with Potential Research Participants 9.1. A Protocol PI may propose for IRB review and approval a contact technique that minimizes the risk of intrusiveness and coercion. 9.2. Where potential participants are identified from sensitive information or private records, the initial contact with them must be made by someone with legitimate access to the information (and, in the case of medical patients, to those patients). 10. Criteria for IRB Review of Recruitment Methods and Advertisements 10.1. The IRB shall review recruitment materials to ensure that they are not unduly coercive or misleading. For instance, advertisements may not overstate the potential benefits of the study beyond what is outlined (and approved) in the consent materials and protocol. Nor may advertisements imply that the research or investigator offers a unique or special skill, remedy, or treatment. Advertisements, also, may not promise free treatment, when the intent is only to say that participants will not be charged for participation. 10.2. The IRB shall pay particular attention to the potential coercive effects of recruitment methods and materials directed at vulnerable populations. 10.3. The IRB shall ensure that advertisements do not include language exculpating the investigators, sponsors, Cornell, or others, in the event of an adverse event or unanticipated problem. 10.4. The IRB shall ensure that payment information is accurate and not unduly emphasized. Moreover, the IRB shall ensure that the amount of payment does not constitute a coercive reward or inducement for participation. 5