COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

Similar documents
Court of Appeals of Ohio

How To Get A Sentence For A Drug Violation

COURT OF APPEALS MUSKINGUM COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO

GETTING TO KNOW THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

An Introduction to the Federal Public Defender=s Office and the Federal Court System

Criminal Justice System Commonly Used Terms & Definitions

BASIC CRIMINAL LAW. Joe Bodiford. Overview of a criminal case Presented by: Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer

Mahoning County Criminal Local Rules of Court. Table of Contents. 2 Grand Jury 2. 3 Dismissals Appointment of Counsel... 4

Court of Appeals of Ohio

HOW A TYPICAL CRIMINAL CASE IS PROSECUTED IN ALASKA

Maricopa County Attorney s Office Adult Criminal Case Process

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY. : O P I N I O N - vs - 10/21/2013 :

COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

Subchapter Criminal Procedure in District Court

Information for Crime Victims and Witnesses

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. L Trial Court No. CR

DESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR DEFENDANTS

Glossary of Terms Acquittal Affidavit Allegation Appeal Arraignment Arrest Warrant Assistant District Attorney General Attachment Bail Bailiff Bench

A Citizen s Guide to the Criminal Justice System: From Arraignment to Appeal

UNDERSTANDING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Anne Benson

The Court Process. Understanding the criminal justice process

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART THREE A CRIMINAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE APPENDIX

A Victim s Guide to Understanding the Criminal Justice System

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO IA SCT

A petty offense is either a violation or a traffic infraction. Such offenses are not crimes.

No CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. FRED ANDERSON, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Introduction. 1 P age

Title 15 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE -Chapter 23 ALABAMA CRIME VICTIMS Article 3 Crime Victims' Rights

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2015 WY 108

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

RENDERED: SEPTEMBER 1, 2000; 10:00 a.m. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED NO CA MR COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY OPINION AFFIRMING ** ** ** ** **

MEDINA COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT EARLY INTERVENTION PRE-TRIAL PROGRAM

2015 IL App (1st) U. No IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

STATE'S RESPONSE BRIEF

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT. For defendant-appellant: : : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION : MAY 25, 2006

A Federal Criminal Case Timeline

Criminal Justice System Glossary of Terms

A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CR. LUIS ANTONIO RIQUIAC QUEUNAY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION 1

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT

CHAPTER 6: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE MICHIGAN COURT RULES OF 1985

Greenville Municipal Court s Vision. To promote accuracy and efficiency in our information for the benefit of our external and internal partners.

KENTUCKY VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1

Filing Fee $ Instructions for Sealing a Criminal Record

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Morgan County Prosecuting Attorney Debra MH McLaughlin

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. State of Ohio, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) CASE NO.: vs. ) ) DRUG COURT PLEA, ) ) Defendant )

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

Information about the Criminal Justice System**

The Circuit Court. Judges and Clerks. Jurisdiction

ARTICLE 36: KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES

INTRODUCTION DO YOU NEED A LAWYER?

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No WDA 2014

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

CAUSE NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE 49th DISTRICT COURT ZAPATA COUNTY, TEXAS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No Filed May 20, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Woodbury County, Jeffrey A.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

Myths about Criminal Justice 17 Summary 18 Key Terms 19 Review Questions 19 In the Field 20 On the Net 20 Critical Thinking Exercises 20

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR WOODBURY COUNTY. WRITTEN PLEA OF GUILTY AND WAIVER OF RIGHTS (OWI First Offense)

FILED December 8, 2015 Carla Bender 4 th District Appellate Court, IL

MODEL CRIMINAL DEFENSE MENTORING PROGRAM Utah State Bar New Lawyer Training Program

KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Kern County Superior Court

BRYCE A. FETTER ORLANDO JUVENILE CHARGES ATTORNEY

C O H E N, T O D D, K I T E & S T A N F O R D, L L C

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Hon. Julie A. Edwards, J. Hon. John F. Boggins, J.

CHAPTER. What is Criminal Justice? Criminal Justice: Criminal Justice: Criminal Justice: What is the Definition of Crime?

Chapter 15 Criminal Law and Procedures

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 193 MDA 2014

Mark Reed Arrest Record Summary As of 3/28/12

526 East Main Street P.O. Box 2385 Alliance, OH Akron, OH 44309

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO FAYETTE COUNTY

TARRANT COUNTY CRIMINAL COURTS MISDEMEANOR COURT-APPOINTMENT PLAN

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs November 3, 2015

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

{ 2} Appellant, Jimmy Houston, sets forth the following single assignment of. In fashioning the sentence, the trial court violated Mr.

ACTION GUIDE November 2004

RENDERED: May 7, 1999; 10:00 a.m. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED NO CA MR COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY OPINION AFFIRMING ** ** ** ** **

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Jose) CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:01-cr JW-1

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No WDA 2013

Criminal Justice 101 (Part II) Grand Jury, Trial, & Sentencing. The Charging Decision. Grand Jury 5/22/2014. Misdemeanors v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF Appellant : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : JOSEPH MENDEZ, : Appellee : No.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

External Advisory Group Meeting June 2, 2015

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2010).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE DIVISION. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) v. ) No. ) (Judge ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT KENT COUNTY CRIMINAL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

GETTING THROUGH THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

Information For Defendants About Getting A Court-Appointed Attorney

STATE OF MAINE WADE R. HOOVER. [ 1] Wade R. Hoover appeals from an order of the trial court (Murphy, J.)

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

Your Criminal Justice System

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2010 WY 73

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

DA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2010 MT 104

Transcription:

COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee -vs- BRANDON KENNARD Defendant-Appellant JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Hon. John W. Wise, J. Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, J. Case No. 2016CA00029 O P I N I O N CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Appeal from the Richland County Common Pleas Court, Case Nos. 2010-CR-0396 and 2010-CR-0543 JUDGMENT: Affirmed DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: December 16, 2016 APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff-Appellee For Defendant-Appellant BAMBI COUCH PAGE BRANDON KENNARD, PRO SE Prosecuting Attorney Inmate No. 672-677 Richland County, Ohio Allen Oakwood Correctional Institution 2338 North West Street By: DANIEL M. ROGERS Lima, Ohio 45802 Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Richland County Prosecutor s Office 38 S. Park Street Mansfield, Ohio 44902

Richland County, Case No. 2016CA00029 2 Hoffman, P.J. { 1} Defendant-appellant Brandon M. Kennard appeals the November 3, 2015 Order for Additional Jail Time Credit entered by the Richland County Court of Common Pleas. Plaintiff-appellee is the state of Ohio. STATEMENT OF THE CASE 1 { 2} On July 9, 2010, the Richland County Grand Jury indicted Appellant on one count of receiving stolen property, in violation of R.C. 2913.51(A), a felony of the fifth degree, in Richland County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 10-CR-0396. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the Indictment at his arraignment on August 10, 2010. At a Prosecutor Pretrial on August 23, 2010, the trial court appointed Attorney Dale Musilli as counsel for Appellant. The trial court also released Appellant on a $10,000 personal recognizance bond. { 3} The trial court revoked Appellant s bond and issued a bench warrant for his arrest on September 10, 2010. The trial court scheduled a final pretrial for October 19, 2010, and jury trial for November 15, 2010. { 4} On October 8, 2010, the Richland County Grand Jury indicted Appellant on one count of receiving stolen property, in violation of R.C. 2913.51(A), a felony of the fifth degree; and one count of forgery, in violation of R.C. 2913.31(A)(3), a felony of the fifth degree, in Richland County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 2010-CR-0543. 1 A Statement of the Facts underlying Appellant s conviction and sentence is not necessary for our disposition of this Appeal.

Richland County, Case No. 2016CA00029 3 { 5} At the final pretrial in Case No. 10-CR-0396 on October 19, 2010, the state filed a Notice of Victims of Crime in Case No. 10-CR-0543. The trial court continued the jury trial in Case No. 10-CR-0396 after Appellant requested a change of plea hearing. { 6} Appellant appeared for arraignment in Case No. 2010-CR-0543 on December 16, 2010, and entered a plea of not guilty to the Indictment. The trial court continued Attorney Musilli s prior appointment and scheduled a Prosecutor Pretrial for December 27, 2010. The trial court scheduled final pretrials in both cases for January 18, 2011, and jury trials in both cases for February 28, 2011. Subsequently, upon Appellant s request, the trial court scheduled change of plea hearings in both cases for February 23, 2011. { 7} On February 23, 2011, Appellant appeared before the trial court, withdrew his former pleas of not guilty, and entered a plea of guilty to all of the counts in both Indictments. The trial court imposed prison terms of nine months on each of the three counts with the terms to be served consecutively. The trial court suspended the sentence and placed Appellant on three years of community control. The trial court also ordered Appellant to pay restitution. { 8} Appellant violated his community control, and the trial court issued bench warrants in Case Nos. 10-CR-0396 and 10-CR-0543. The trial court tolled Appellant s community control period pending his arrest on the bench warrants. Appellant appeared for arraignment on the community control violations on March 3, 2012, and entered pleas of not guilty. At the final hearing on March 13, 2012, Appellant pled guilty to the community control violations. The trial court continued Appellant on community control, and ordered him to complete treatment in a community based correctional facility.

Richland County, Case No. 2016CA00029 4 { 9} On June 25, 2012, after Appellant again violated his community control, the trial court issued bench warrants in Case Nos. 10-CR-0396 and 10-CR-0543. The trial court learned Appellant was incarcerated in the Ashland County Jail. On July 9, 2012, the trial court scheduled an arraignment on the new community control violations for July 24, 2012, and issued an order to convey. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the community control violations. Attorney Marcus Wolf entered a Notice of Appearance on Appellant s behalf. Appellant pled guilty to the community control violations on August 8, 2012. The trial court again continued community control, and ordered Appellant to complete treatment at Volunteers of America. The trial court advised Appellant any further community control violations would result in the imposition on his entire suspended prison terms. { 10} Appellant entered Volunteers of America on August 9, 2012. He spent his first seven days there on restricted-to-the-facility status. Appellant completed Volunteers of America on October 18, 2012. The trial court issued bench warrants in Case Nos. 10- CR-0396 and 10-CR-0543 based upon Appellant s violating his community control due to his conviction in Ashland County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 12-CRI-073. Appellant was arraigned on the new community control violations on October 23, 2012. Attorney Wolf was appointed to represent Appellant. The trial court released Appellant on a personal recognizance bond, and ordered him to reside at the Community Alternative Center. The trial court revoked Appellant s bond and issued a bench warrant on November 13, 2012. The trial court conducted a final hearing on the community control violations on November 21, 2012.

Richland County, Case No. 2016CA00029 5 { 11} Appellant was sentenced to an eight month prison term in Ashland County Case No. 12-CRI-073 on December 10, 2012. The trial court tolled Appellant s community control period in Case Nos. 10-CR-0396 and 10-CR-0543 while he served his sentence in the Ashland County case. The trial court reinstated Appellant s community control on July 23, 2013. { 12} On September 11, 2014, the trial court issued bench warrants in Case Nos. 10-CR-0396 and 10-CR-0543 after Appellant again violated his community control. Appellant ultimately pled guilty to the community control violations. The trial court continued Appellant on community control, ordered him to complete Firelands Drug and Mental Health Counseling and to maintain full-time employment. The trial court advised Appellant no future community control violations would be tolerated. On December 29, 2014, the trial court extended Appellant s community control until January 25, 2017. The trial court later extended his community control until February 8, 2017. { 13} After Appellant once again violated his community control, the trial court issued bench warrants on May 5, 2015. The trial court tolled Appellant s community control until his arrest on the bench warrants. Appellant was served with the warrants on July 18, 2015. Appellant subsequently pled guilty to the community control violations on August 12, 2015. The trial court imposed the three originally suspended nine month prison terms. The trial court credited Appellant with 149 days of jail-time credit. { 14} On October 15, 2015, Appellant filed a motion for jail-time credit, requesting credit for time spent in the Richland County Jail, the Huron County Jail, Volunteers of America, and the Community Alternative Center. Program directors for Volunteers of America and the Community Alternative Center filed affidavits with the trial court

Richland County, Case No. 2016CA00029 6 describing their respective facilities and Appellant s time at those facilities. Appellant did not provide the trial court with any evidence or documentation relative to his time in the Richland County Jail or the Huron County Jail. { 15} Via Order filed November 3, 2015, the trial court granted Appellant seven days of jail-time credit for the time he spent at Volunteers of America, and seventeen days of jail-time credit for the time he spent at the Community Alternative Center. Appellant did not appeal the trial court s November 3, 2015 Order. { 16} On March 16, 2015, Appellant filed a motion for pretrial jail-time credit. In support of his motion, Appellant attached a hand-written letter to the trial court. Appellant again requested jail-time credit for his time at Volunteers of America and the Community Alternative Center as well as time spent in the Huron County Jail. Appellant did not provide the trial court with any evidence or documentation supporting his request for additional jail-time credit for his time at Volunteers of America or the Community Alternative Center. { 17} Via Order filed April 26, 2016, the trial court denied Appellant s request for additional jail-time credit for his time at Volunteers of America and the Community Alternative Center, but granted Appellant thirteen days of jail-time credit for his time in the Huron County Jail. { 18} It is from this order Appellant appeals, raising as his sole assignment of error: I. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN NOT GIVING KENNARD TIME CREDIT FOR BEING IN A COMMUNITY-BASED CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (CBCF).

Richland County, Case No. 2016CA00029 7 I { 19} In his sole assignment of error, Appellant specifically contends the trial court erred in failing to grant him jail-time credit for all seventy-one days he spent at Volunteers of America. { 20} We overrule Appellant s assignment of error as it is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. { 21} Under the doctrine of res judicata, a final judgment of conviction bars a convicted defendant who was represented by counsel from raising and litigating in any proceeding, except an appeal from that judgment, any defense or any claimed lack of due process that was raised or could have been raised by the defendant at the trial, which resulted in that judgment of conviction, or on an appeal from that judgment. State v. Szefcyk (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 93, 95. { 22} In his October 15, 2015 motion for jail-time credit, Appellant requested, for the first time, jail-time credit of seventy-one days for his time at Volunteers of America. Nicole Chinn, a program director at Volunteers of America, filed an affidavit with the trial court, describing the facility and Appellant s time at the facility. Relying on the affidavit, the trial court granted Appellant credit for the first seven days he spent at Volunteers of America, but not for his remaining sixty-four days. See, November 3, 2015 Order. Appellant did not file an appeal from the November 3, 2015 Order. Instead, Appellant filed

Richland County, Case No. 2016CA00029 8 another motion for pre-trial jail credit on March 16, 2016, again requesting credit for the entire seventy-one days he was at Volunteers of America. 2 { 23} We find the trial court properly denied Appellant s additional request for jailtime credit at Volunteers of America based upon res judicata. { 24} Appellant s sole assignment of error is overruled. { 25} The judgment of the Richland County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed. By: Hoffman, P.J. Wise, J. and Baldwin, J. concur 2 Appellant included a hand-written letter to the trial court in support of his motion. The information contained in the letter conflicted with the information in Chinn s affidavit.