STATISTICAL BRIEF #98



Similar documents
STATISTICAL BRIEF #160

STATISTICAL BRIEF #48

STATISTICAL BRIEF #209

Statistical Brief #25: Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Characteristics by Average Payroll for the Private Sector in 2001

STATISTICAL BRIEF #189

Health Insurance - A statisticical Overview For Employers

STATISTICAL BRIEF #230

STATISTICAL BRIEF #182

No Employee Contribution Health Insurance in the US - State Overview

Medical Expenditure and Health Insurance in the United States

STATISTICAL BRIEF #322

STATISTICAL BRIEF #155

STATISTICAL BRIEF #369

STATISTICAL BRIEF #207

STATISTICAL BRIEF #251

STATISTICAL BRIEF #285

STATISTICAL BRIEF #436

STATISTICAL BRIEF #330

STATISTICAL BRIEF #90

STATISTICAL BRIEF #273

STATISTICAL BRIEF #435

STATISTICAL BRIEF #202

STATISTICAL BRIEF #167

STATISTICAL BRIEF #267

STATISTICAL BRIEF #40

STATISTICAL BRIEF #93

Private Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance

This notice announces the intention of the Agency for Healthcare. Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request that the Office of Management and Budget

STATISTICAL BRIEF #173

Full-Time Poor and Low Income Workers: Demographic Characteristics and Trends in Health Insurance Coverage, to

Papers presented at the ICES-III, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

THE GROWING COST OF HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE HEALTH CARE COSTS AND SPENDING IN NEW YORK STATE

Data Bulletin Findings from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Insurance Component

Health Care Expenditures for Uncomplicated Pregnancies

HEALTH INSURANCE COST STUDY

Overview of Methodology for Imputing Missing Expenditure Data in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey

STATISTICAL BRIEF #113

How Non-Group Health Coverage Varies with Income

Research. Dental Services: Use, Expenses, and Sources of Payment,

STATISTICAL BRIEF #143

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Health Insurance Coverage and Usual Source of Health Care, 2002

STATISTICAL BRIEF #117

STATISTICAL BRIEF #383

How To Get A Small Business Health Insurance Plan For Free

Using the MEPS-IC* to Understand the Impact of the ACA**

Merrile Sing. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Working Paper No December 2008

STATISTICAL BRIEF #137

Research. brief CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE: FIRM SPENDING AND WORKER COVERAGE

ACTUARIAL VALUE AND EMPLOYER- SPONSORED INSURANCE

GAO PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT. Estimates of the Effect on the Prevalence of Employer-Sponsored Health Coverage

STATISTICAL BRIEF #95

Health Insurance in the Small Business Market: Availability, Coverage, and the Effect of Tax Incentives

Alice M. Zawacki and Amy K. Taylor. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Working Paper No January 2005

Household health care spending: comparing the Consumer Expenditure Survey and the National Health Expenditure Accounts Ann C.

Why are Health Insurance Premiums So Much Higher for Public Employers Compared to Private Employers?

A Helping Hand For New York s Small Businesses. Health Insurance Tax Credits

Health Care Cost and Insurance Coverage in Five Southern States

STATISTICAL BRIEF #87

Health Economics Program

california Health Care Almanac California Employer Health Benefits Survey: Fewer Covered, More Cost

Health Economics Program

August Comparing Federal Government Surveys that Count Uninsured People in America

STATISTICAL BRIEF #378

Declining Health Insurance in Low-Income Working Families and Small Businesses

New Employer Group Enrollment Information

Effects of the PPACA Health Insurance Premium Tax on Small Businesses and Their Employees

PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE. Early Effects of Medical Loss Ratio Requirements and Rebates on Insurers and Enrollees

INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS OF HOURLY COMPENSATION COSTS

Section 3: Employment-Based Health Insurance

Under current tax law, health insurance premiums are largely taxexempt

GAO EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION

Health Care and Business: The Bottom Line. The High Cost of Doing Nothing

DRAFT. Final Report. Wisconsin Department of Health Services Division of Health Care Access and Accountability

california Health Care Almanac California Employer Health Benefits Survey

Health Insurance Coverage in the U.S. The New Census Bureau Numbers for 2000 and The Trend into 2001

Over the last several years, the Bureau

Section 1: Minnesota Health Care Spending and Cost Drivers

Health Care: Don t Forget Saving Families $2,500

Employer-provided life insurance

ADP Annual Health Benefits Report

Frequently Asked Questions About The Health Insurance Market in Vermont

Jessica S. Banthin and Thomas M. Selden. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Working Paper No July 2006

John Keel, CPA State Auditor. A Report on State Employee Benefits as a Percentage of Total Compensation. April 2014 Report No.

Eligibility for Medi-Cal and the Health Insurance Exchange in California under the Affordable Care Act

New Mexico Health Care Reform Fiscal Model: Detailed Analysis and Methodology

Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US: Financing Healthcare

VII. DIRECT, INDIRECT, AND INDUCED ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF UC SAN DIEGO

Steven B. Cohen. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Working Paper No February 2011

Steven R. Machlin and Marc W. Zodet. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Working Paper No October 2007

Health Insurance Tax Credits

Preliminary Health Insurance Landscape Analysis

State of Louisiana Barber and Beauty Shops Survey August 1998

State of Arkansas Barber and Beauty Shops Survey August 1998

The Effect of Employer Health Insurance Offering on the Growth and Survival of Small Business

The expense for hospital room

Tax Subsidies for Health Insurance An Issue Brief

ObamaCare s Impact on Small Business Wages and Employment

Transcription:

Agency for Healthcare Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Research and Quality STATISTICAL BRIEF #98 September 5 Costs to small private sector employers who offered employer-spon- sored health insurance to their employees as a percentage of their total payroll costs rose from 6. percent in to 7.5 percent in 3, with substantial variations by industry classification. Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Costs, Offer Rates, and Take-Up Rates for Small Employers in the Private Sector, by Industry Classification, and 3 John Sommers and Richard Keach Introduction In, according to the Insurance Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS-IC), the cost for employersponsored health insurance for 64.3 million active enrollees in the private sector in the United States was $95 billion. This was approximately $4,59 per active enrollee with any type of coverage: single, family, or one-plus-one. This cost was shared by employers who offered health insurance and the active enrollees. In 3, the same cost for 6.7 million active enrollees in the private sector was $6,95 per active enrollee, a total of $37 billion. The costs per enrollee had increased 3 percent. This rate was much higher than the approximately 7 percent increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for the same time period. Increases in the cost of health insurance are a large concern for small private sector employers (those with fewer than 5 employees). According to the National Survey of Small Businesses, 67 percent of the executives surveyed were dissatisfied with the costs of employer-sponsored health care and felt that rising costs would lead to disruptions in coverage. This Statistical Brief examines health insurance costs for small private sector employers and their enrolled employees as a percentage of payroll, by industry, for the years and 3. The brief also shows the percentage of employees who worked at small private sector employers where health insurance was offered in those years and the percentage of these employees who enrolled during those years. These offer and participation rates for small private sector employers are a possible indication of employer and employee reactions to the large changes in costs between and 3. All differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the.5 level unless otherwise noted. Highlights Between and 3, the percentage of employ- ees who worked for small private sector employers who offered health insur ance dropped from 67.8 percent to 6.6 percent, with variations by industry classification. The total employee contributions per payroll of enrolled employees at small private sector employers who offered health insurance rose from.3 percent in to 3. percent in 3, with variations by industry classification. The percentage of employees of small private sector firms who worked where health insurance was offered and enrolled in employer-sponsored health insurance did not change significantly between and 3. Bureau of Labor Statistics Web site: http://www.bls.gov/data/ Kaiser Family Foundation. National Survey of Small Businesses. April. Menlo Park, CA, Publication Number 4.

Findings Small private sector employers who offered health insurance spent an average of 6 cents per dollar of payroll on employee health insurance costs in (figure ). By 3, this cost rose to 7.5 cents per dollar of payroll for small employers who offered health insurance, a 5 percent increase. The largest real gain in costs was in the Utilities and industry, whose costs rose from 5. to 8.9 cents per dollar of payroll, an amount higher than the national rate. During the same time period, the and Real industry showed a smaller than average increase. Between and 3, the percentage of employees in small firms who worked where health insurance was offered dropped from 67.8 percent to 6.6 percent (figure ). During that time frame, the offer rate for small businesses in most industries showed a significant decline. The Utilities and industry showed a decline that was higher than average. Only and did not show significant declines in offer rates by small businesses. Between and 3, the total contribution by enrolled employees at small private sector firms rose from.3 to 3. percent of the total average payroll for enrolled employees (figure 3). This percentage of payroll rose in all industries except Utilities and and and Real, where there was no significant change. The percentage of employees who worked for small private sector employers who offered health insurance and enrolled in their employer s plan changed from 6. to 6.7 percent, respectively, between and 3 (figure 4). This reduction was not statistically significant. Data Source This Statistical Brief summarizes data from the and 3 MEPS-IC. The data are available on the MEPS Web site (www.meps.ahrq.gov) or have been produced using special computation runs on the confidential MEPS-IC data available at the Census Bureau. Definitions In this Statistical Brief, an employer is defined as a private sector firm. A firm is defined as a business entity that controls one or more business establishments or locations. Consequently, an employer can have multiple work locations. Only small employers with fewer than 5 employees across all their locations were included in this analysis. The classification by industry is based upon the North American Industrial Classification System. All payroll and contributions were annualized for this paper. Payroll includes all forms of compensation, such as salaries, wages, commissions, dismissal pay, bonuses, and employee contributions to pension plans. Payroll excludes fringe benefits. This definition is the same as that used by the Internal Revenue Service on Form 94. Total payroll at firms that offer health insurance was estimated using the weighted sum of total annual payroll for establishments (locations) in the sample. Total payroll per enrolled employee was obtained by using average payroll per employee reported for each establishment in the sample that offered health insurance. This value was multiplied by the number of enrolled employees at the establishment. The weighted sum of these values was taken as an estimate of the total payroll for enrolled employees. Total contributions for enrollees by employers where health insurance is offered was estimated by taking the employer portion of each type of plan (single, one-plus-one, and family) and its associated premiums at the sample establishment and multiplying by the associated plan enrollments. These values were summed over all plans and types of enrollment at the establishment, and the weighted sum of these values across all establishments was used as the estimate of total employer contributions. Total employee contributions were calculated with a method parallel to that used for employer contributions.

About MEPS-IC MEPS-IC is a survey of business establishments and governments that collects information on employer-sponsored health insurance, such as whether insurance is offered, enrollments, types of plans, and premiums. The survey is conducted annually by the Bureau of the Census under the sponsorship of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The yearly response rate has averaged 78 percent for in-scope sample units. Approximately 4 percent of the original sample has been out-of-scope in a typical year. A total sample of 4, establishments was selected for the 3 survey, prior to accounting for losses due to nonresponse and out-of-scope cases. For more information on this survey, see MEPS Methodology Reports 6, 8, and under MEPS publications at http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_stats/publications.jsp and the MEPS-IC Technical Appendix at http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/survey_comp/ic_technical_notes.jsp. Suggested Citation Sommers, J. (AHRQ) and Keach, R. (Census Bureau). Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Costs, Offer Rates, and Take-Up Rates for Small Employers in the Private Sector, by Industry Classification, and 3. Statistical Brief #98. September 5. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Md.http://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_files/publications/st98/stat98.pdf AHRQ welcomes questions and comments from readers of this publication who are interested in obtaining more information about access, cost, use, financing, and quality of health care in the United States. We also invite you to tell us how you are using this Statistical Brief and other MEPS data and tools and to share suggestions on how MEPS products might be enhanced to further meet your needs. Please e-mail us at mepspd@ahrq.gov or send a letter to the address below: Steven B. Cohen, PhD Director Center for Financing, Access, and Cost Trends Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 54 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 85

Figure. Employer health insurance costs as a percentage of all payroll in private sector firms with fewer than 5 employees that offer health insurance, by industry, and 3 3 9 8 7 6 5 4 7. 9. 6. 8.3 5. 8.9 6.7 8.3 6. 6.3 7. 8. 4.6 6.9 7.4 8.9 6. 7.5 3 & Real Source: Center for Financing, Access, and Cost Trends, AHRQ, Insurance Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, and 3 Figure. age of private sector employees in firms with fewer than 5 employees who work where health insurance is offered, by industry, and 3 3 9 8 7 6 5 4 86.3 76.8 63.9 76.8 6.5 8. 78. 77.3 66.3 54.9 73.5 7.3 54.3 49.4 67.8 6.6 3 & Real Source: Center for Financing, Access, and Cost Trends, AHRQ, Insurance Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, and 3

Figure 3. Employee insurance contributions as percentage of estimated total payroll for enrollees in employer-sponsored health insurance at private sector firms with fewer than 5 employees, by industry, and 3 3 6 5.5 5 4 3.4 3..9 3.6 3..8.9.7.8.6 4..7.7 3.6 4..3 3. & Real Source: Center for Financing, Access, and Cost Trends, AHRQ, Insurance Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, and 3 Figure 4. age of private sector employees who enrolled in health insurance in firms with fewer than 5 employees that offered health insurance, by industry, and 3 3 8 7 6 7.6 7.6 66.5 65.7 64.4 53. 74.5 74.4 7. 59.3 55. 68.5 64.7 6. 6.7 5 4 45.8 43.8 3 & Real Source: Center for Financing, Access, and Cost Trends, AHRQ, Insurance Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, and 3