SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Similar documents
OFFICIAL COURT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

United States District Court, District of Minnesota. Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv DWF/JSM

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE COURT

LEGAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial.

A State Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

If you had a loan serviced by Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, your rights may be affected by a class action settlement, including your right to money.

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

As a current or former non-exempt PPG employee, you may be entitled to receive money from a class action settlement.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND CLAIM PROCESS

Plaintiff, NO Defendants.

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

A United States District Court has authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VERA WILLNER, ET AL. V. MANPOWER INC., CASE NO. 3:11-CV JST (MEJ)

TO: ALL PERSONS AND BUSINESSES WITH A VERIZON.NET ADDRESS

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

SUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT. This notice explains the lawsuit, the settlement, your rights and the potential distribution of settlement funds.

Consumers and Businesses May Claim Microsoft Settlement Benefits

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

U.S. BANK CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. 2:08-md MJP. Lead Case No. C MJP

Picchi v. World Financial Network Bank, et al. Case No.: 11 CV Altonaga / O Sullivan

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:06-cv DLR CLASS ACTION

QUESTIONS? CALL 1 (844) OR VISIT 1

Reasons for Settlement: Avoids the costs and risks associated with continued litigation, including the danger of no recovery.

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:11-cv RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Superior Court of California, County of San Diego Webb v. Allstate Insurance Company Case No

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE

IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR DALLAS COUNTY

If you received a wrong-number call related to a Verizon debt, you could get benefits and your rights may be affected by a class action settlement

Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement and Fairness Hearing

A Court authorized this Notice. It is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Master File No. 3:10-cv CAB-DHB CLASS ACTION

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Case No. CV R NOTICE TO CLASS OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OF THE TRIAL COURT CIVIL ACTION NO C

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Superior Court of Cobb County, State of Georgia In re Cobb EMC Class Action, Case No. 10: NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT GRECO V. SELECTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. San Diego Superior Court Case No CU-BT-CTL

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT BUSINESS LITIGATION SESSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

United States District Court for the Southern District of California Case No. 11-md-2286 MMA (MDD)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. ED-CV GW(JCx) CLASS ACTION

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Notice of Class Action Settlement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS SETTLEMENT

If You Purchased Relacore From January 1, 2000 through November 10, 2014, You Could Receive a Payment From a Proposed Class Action Settlement.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY

Submit a Valid Claim Form Deadline: February 12, 2016 Ask to be excluded Deadline: November 24, Object Deadline: November 24, 2015

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THIS LAWSUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM. Blitz v. AgFeed Industries, Inc. c/o Claims Administrator PO Box 3207 Portland, OR Tel:

How To Settle A Class Action Lawsuit Against Jimmy Johns

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES

Your Legal Rights and Options in this Settlement

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

In re Convergent Telephone Consumer Protection Act Litigation United States District Court, District of Connecticut Case No.

Your Legal Rights and Options in this Settlement:

If You Purchased StarKist Tuna, You May Benefit From A Proposed Class Action Settlement

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE No. 5:13-CV LHK

Employee Settlement and Release Agreement.

Case 2:06-cv FCD-KJM Document 220 Filed 06/02/2009 Page 1 of 11

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT BAUER V. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC. CASE NO. BC375017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 8:13-cv GJH Document 71 Filed 12/02/14 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : CLASS ACTION

THIS NOTICE IS TO INFORM YOU OF A PROPOSED SETTLEMENT THAT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS. A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON In re Classmates.com Consolidated Litigation, Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE No. 09-CV JCC

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE. WHEREAS, Prince was employed as KSU s head football coach between December 5, 2005 and December 31, 2008; and

United States District Court for the District of Connecticut NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Transcription:

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO PETER R. GRAY, JR et al., Plaintiffs, v. BEVERAGES & MORE, INC. DBA BEVMO, Defendant. Civ. No. CGC-09-493678 NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TO: ANY NATURAL PERSON WHO, FROM OCTOBER 21, 2005 THROUGH FEBRUARY 9, 2010 (THE CLASS PERIOD ), PURCHASED ONE OR MORE TWO-BOTTLE SETS OF WINE AT BEVERAGES & MORE ( BEVMO ) PURSUANT TO A BEVMO 5 CENT SALE EITHER (1) FROM A BEVMO STORE LOCATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OR (2) THROUGH BEVMO S WEBSITE AND MADE PAYMENT FROM A BILLING ADDRESS IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BUT EXCLUDING THE JUDGE ASSIGNED TO THIS MATTER AND HIS IMMEDIATELY FAMILY, DEFENDANT, ANY ENTITIES IN WHICH DEFENDANT HAS A CONTROLLING INTEREST OR WHICH HAVE A CONTROLLING INTEREST IN DEFENDANT, AND THE OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, AFFILIATES AND ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT (THE SETTLEMENT CLASS ). PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE IN ITS ENTIRETY. YOUR RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED BY PROCEEDINGS IN THIS LITIGATION. If you purchased one or more two-bottle sets of wine at BevMo pursuant to a 5 Cent Sale during the Class Period, you could get a payment in the form of one or more Discount Coupons from a class action settlement (the Settlement ). The Settlement website is www.fivecentsalesettlement.com. If approved by the Court, the Settlement will provide: (1) permanent changes to BevMo s marketing practices relating to its 5 Cent Sales; (2) to each person that BevMo s computer records identify as a member of the Settlement Class ( Settlement Class Members ), one (1) onedollar ($1.00) Discount Coupon for each two-bottle set of wine purchased pursuant to a 5 Cent Sale during the Class Period; and (3) up to $296,000 in attorneys fees, expenses and costs, and a $1,000 award to Plaintiff Peter R. Gray, Jr. (the Named Plaintiff ), and any taxes. Information about how Settlement Class Members can obtain Discount Coupons is below. Attorneys for the Named Plaintiff ( Lead Class Counsel ) state that they have incurred in excess of $425,000 in attorney s fees, costs and expenses. They have agreed to limit their request for fees costs and expenses, which must be approved by the Court, to $296,000. Lead Class Counsel for the Named Plaintiff also intends to ask the Court to award the Named Plaintiff $1,000 as an award for his time spent on the lawsuit. Those amounts, if approved by the Court, will be paid by BevMo, and will not reduce the amount of relief available to class members. The Settlement resolves a lawsuit as to whether BevMo allegedly made misleading statements to California consumers with respect to its 5 Cent Sale wine promotion in violation of California Civil Code Section 1750 et seq., California Business and Professions Code Section 17200 et seq., and California Business and Professions Code Section 17500 et seq. BevMo denies the allegations in the lawsuit and denies any wrongdoing and no court has decided that BevMo did anything wrong.

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT DO NOTHING AND RECEIVE BENEFIT UPDATE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS NO LATER THAN JULY 27, 2015 OBJECT NO LATER THAN JUNE 27, 2015 EXCLUDE YOURSELF NO LATER THAN JULY 13, 2015 If the Court orders payments to Settlement Class Members, and if BevMo s computer records show you are a Settlement Class Member, BevMo will automatically email you one (1) one-dollar Discount Coupon for each two-bottle set of wine you purchased pursuant to a 5 Cent Sale from October 21, 2005 through February 9, 2010. BevMo will use the email address it has on file for you. You will also give up your right to be part of any other lawsuit against BevMo about the claims in this case. If you are a Settlement Class Member and you believe your email address in BevMo s database is out of date or incorrect, you must update your email address no later than July 27, 2015 to receive one or more Discount Coupons. You can update your contact information at BevMo.com or by calling 1-877-77BEVMO during BevMo s business hours. Submit a written objection explaining why you do not like the Settlement and think it should not be approved. You must send your objection to Lead Class Counsel by mail or email so that it is received by Lead Class Counsel no later than June 27, 2015 (if mailed, it must be postmarked no later than June 22, 2015), who will then file it with the Court for you. If you submit an objection, you may also speak at the Court s Final Approval Hearing to explain your position. You are not required to attend the hearing, though. The Final Approval Hearing will take place on July 27, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.. Get no payment in the form of one or more Discount Coupons. This is the only option that allows you to be a part of any other lawsuit against BevMo about the legal claims in this case. These rights and options are explained in more detail below. 2

INQUIRIES Please do not contact the Court regarding this notice ( Notice ). All inquiries concerning this Notice, or any other questions by Settlement Class Members, should be directed to Lead Class Counsel: Robert J. Stein III ALVARADOSMITH, APC 1 MacArthur Place, Suite 200 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Tel: (714) 852-6837 rstein.settlement@alvaradosmith.com COMMON QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS CONCERNING THE SETTLEMENT 1. What is the purpose of this notice? This notice has been issued pursuant to an Order of the Superior Court of the State of California in San Francisco County. The purpose of this notice is to inform you of the proposed Settlement of this class action litigation (the Action ). It is also to inform you of the hearing to be held by the Court to consider the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the Settlement at what is called a Final Approval Hearing. This Notice describes the rights you may have in connection with the Settlement and what steps you may take in relation to the Settlement and the Action. 2. What is this lawsuit about? The lawsuit is known as Gray v. Beverages & More Inc., Civ. No. CGC-493678, and the Court in charge of the case is the Superior Court of the State of California in San Francisco County (the Court ). BevMo periodically holds 5 Cent Sale wine promotions in California in which consumers can buy one bottle of wine and get a second bottle of wine for five cents. To participate in a 5 Cent Sale, a consumer must provide evidence of membership in BevMo s rewards program, called ClubBev. The Action alleges that from October 1, 2005 through February 9, 2010, BevMo made misleading statements to California consumers about the 5 Cent Sale, which allegedly caused consumers to believe they were receiving a larger discount than they were, in fact, receiving, in violation of several of California s consumer protection laws, including Civil Code Section 1750 et seq. and Business & Professions Code Sections 17200 et seq. and 17500 et seq. The Named Plaintiff sought, among other things, declaratory and injunctive relief, restitution, damages, and attorneys fees. The Named Plaintiff has estimated that Class Members experienced damages in the amount of approximately $5.00 per purchase of a two-bottle set of wine. BevMo denies the allegations in the Action, and denies any wrongdoing. In particular, BevMo denies that its marketing with respect to its 5 Cent Sale has been in any way misleading or inconsistent with the requirements of California s consumer protection laws. BevMo also denies that the Named Plaintiff s claims can be adjudicated appropriately on a class basis. 3. Why is this a class action? In a class action, one or more individuals and/or entities, called Named Plaintiffs, sue on behalf of all individuals and/or entities that have similar claims. All of these individuals and/or entities are referred to 3

collectively as a class, and each individual or entity is known as a class member. One court resolves all issues for all class members, except for those class members who exclude themselves from the class. 4. Why did the parties agree to the proposed settlement? Each party has investigated the facts of this case by obtaining, reviewing, and analyzing information from the other party regarding the allegations in the Action. The Named Plaintiff and BevMo do not agree regarding the merits of the Named Plaintiff s allegations with respect to liability, or with respect to the amount of money (if any) that would be recoverable by the Settlement Class if the Named Plaintiff were to prevail at trial. The issues on which the Named Plaintiff and BevMo disagree include: (1) whether BevMo violated California s consumer protection laws; (2) whether a class could legally be certified by the Court if the parties did not settle; and (3) the amount of monetary relief (if any) to which Settlement Class Members would be entitled. This matter has not gone to trial and the Court has not decided in favor of either the Named Plaintiff or BevMo. Instead, the Named Plaintiff and BevMo have agreed to settle the Action. The parties have negotiated the terms of an Agreement of Settlement (the Settlement Agreement ) in the Action, which is on file with the Court. The Settlement Agreement was reached only after arm s-length negotiations between the parties, who were represented by separate counsel with extensive experience and expertise in class action litigation. During the negotiations, both parties had a clear view of the strengths and weaknesses of their respective claims and defenses. Although BevMo vigorously denied, and continues to deny, any wrongdoing or liability regarding the Named Plaintiff s allegations, BevMo has agreed to settle the Action to avoid the expense, risk, and inconvenience of a trial on the merits and any subsequent appeals, and to put to rest and finally terminate the Action and all Released Claims (as defined below in the response to Question No. 5). Based on a thorough analysis of the facts and the applicable law, and after taking into account the material benefits afforded to the Settlement Class through settlement of this Action, and the risk, delay, and expense of a trial on the merits against BevMo and any subsequent appeals, the Named Plaintiff and Lead Class Counsel also concluded that a settlement of the Action on the terms set forth in the Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interest of all Settlement Class Members. 5. What are the basic terms of the proposed settlement? The proposed Settlement consists of the following elements. Permanent Changes to Advertising Regarding the 5 Cent Sale. After the Action was filed, BevMo made certain changes to its advertising regarding the 5 Cent Sale. In the Settlement Agreement, BevMo agrees that, for as long as it continues offering products as part of the 5 Cent Sale in California, its advertising will continue to reflect these changes. Settlement Discount Coupons. Using the customer information in its database, BevMo will send to each Settlement Class Member, by email, a coupon redeemable for a discount of $1.00 on a new purchase from BevMo (each a Discount Coupon and collectively Discount Coupons ) for each two-bottle set of wine that the Settlement Class Member purchased pursuant to a 5 Cent Sale during the Class Period. 4

Terms of Discount Coupons. Discount Coupons can be redeemed in store for a discount on any goods sold by BevMo up to one hundred eighty (180) days after they are issued by BevMo. Discount Coupons have no cash value, are not transferable, and may be redeemed only by the owner of the ClubBev account number that appears on the Discount Coupon. Discount Coupons can be combined with one another, but they cannot be used with any other coupon (e.g., a promotional coupon) that is not a Discount Coupon provided pursuant to the Settlement. Discount Coupons cannot be used for online purchases, and cannot be applied to any prior purchases. If coupons are used to purchase alcoholic beverages, coupons cannot cover the full price of the purchase; in such cases, coupons can at most cover the dollar amount, rounded down, with the purchaser responsible for paying the remaining charge. BevMo to Bear Costs of Administration. BevMo will bear all costs incurred with respect to providing notices to Settlement Class Members and administering the Settlement. BevMo to Pay Attorneys Fees and Costs. Lead Class Counsel state that they have incurred costs, expenses and attorney s fees in excess of $425,000, however, they have agreed to limit any request they make to the Court for an award of attorneys fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this lawsuit to $296,000. The Named Plaintiff also intends to ask the Court to award him $1,000 as an award for his time spent on the lawsuit. Those amounts, if approved by the Court, will be paid by BevMo, and will not reduce the amount of relief available to class members. Settlement Class Members To Release Claims Against BevMo. If the Settlement Agreement is finally approved by the Court, the Court will enter the final Judgment dismissing with prejudice all Released Claims against all Released Parties. o o o Released Claims means any and all claims, rights, damages, losses, demands, obligations, actions, causes of action, suits, cross-claims, matters, issues, debts, liens, contracts, liabilities, agreements, costs, or expenses of any nature whatsoever, ascertained or unascertained, suspected or unsuspected, existing or claimed to exist, including Unknown Claims (as defined herein), the Plaintiff and/or any and all Settlement Class Members that: (a) arise out of the Action, or (b) relate to any marketing, advertising, promotional activity and/or representations made by the Defendant associated with any 5 Cent Sale during the Class Period, against any Released Party. Released Parties means BevMo and all of its past and present officers, directors, agents, servants, sureties, attorneys, employees, parents, associates, controlling or principal shareholders, general or limited partners or partnerships, subsidiaries, divisions, affiliates, insurers, and all successors or predecessors in interest, assigns, or legal representatives. Unknown Claims means all claims arising out of any matter covered by the Released Claims, which in the future are or may be found to be other than or different from the facts now believed to be true, so that each person or entity so affected shall be deemed to have expressly waived all of the rights and benefits of Section 1542 of the Civil Code, which reads as follows: Section 1542. Certain Claims Not Affected by General Release. A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing 5

the release, which if known by him or her must have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor. o All persons or entities providing releases under the Settlement Agreement, including all Settlement Class Members, upon the date the Judgment becomes Final (as defined in the Settlement Agreement) shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment in the Action shall have, waived any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by Section 1542 of the California Civil Code. All persons or entities providing releases under the Settlement Agreement may hereafter discover facts other than or different from those which he, she or it now knows or believes to be true with respect to the subject matter of the Released Claims, but such person or entity upon the Judgment becoming final shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment in the Action shall have, fully, finally and forever settled and released any and all such claims, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent, whether or not concealed or hidden, which now exist, or heretofore have existed upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming into existence in the future, including conduct which is negligent, intentional, with or without malice, or a breach of any duty, law or rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different or additional facts. 6. How can I get a payment? If BevMo s computer records identify you as a Settlement Class Member, BevMo will automatically email to your email address on file with BevMo one (1) one-dollar Discount Coupon for each two-bottle set of wine you purchased from BevMo in California pursuant to a 5 Cent Sale during the Class Period. If your email address has changed, or if you are not sure if BevMo has your correct email address, you can update your contact information online at BevMo.com or by calling BevMo at 1-877-77BEVMO. Detailed instructions to update your contact information are at www.fivecentsalesettlement.com. 7. How and when will the Court decide whether to approve the settlement? A settlement approval hearing (the Final Approval Hearing ) will be held before the Honorable Curtis E. A. Karnow, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco, 400 McAllister Street, Department 304, San Francisco, California on July 27, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time to determine: (1) whether the proposed settlement of the Action on the terms and conditions provided for in the Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests of the Settlement Class pursuant to California Civil Code Section 1781 and California Rules of Court, Rule 3.769, and should be approved by the Court; (2) whether a Judgment as provided for in the Settlement Agreement should be entered; (3) whether to award Lead Class Counsel their requested attorneys fees and reimbursement of expenses; and (4) whether to award the Named Plaintiff his requested incentive payment. The Court may continue or adjourn the Final Approval Hearing without further notice. 8. What are my rights and obligations to participate in the approval hearing? Any Settlement Class Member may enter an appearance with the Court in this case individually or through a lawyer he or she retains. If Settlement Class Members do not enter an appearance, they will be represented by Lead Class Counsel. Any Settlement Class Member who wishes to make a written objection to the Settlement or to any aspect thereof must mail or email such objection so that it is received by Lead Class Counsel on or before June 6

27, 2015, at the postal or email address provided in this notice. (If sent by mail, objections must be postmarked no later than June 22, 2015.) Any Settlement Class Member who does not make an objection in the manner provided in this Notice will be deemed to have waived such objection and will forever be foreclosed from making any objection to the proposed Settlement set forth in the Settlement Agreement or any aspect thereof, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Any Settlement Class Member who submits a timely objection may speak to the Judge at the Final Approval Hearing to explain his or her objection. However, if you file an objection, you are not required to appear at the Final Approval Hearing. The Court will consider your written objection even if you do not appear. Any written objection must indicate the case name (Gray v. Beverages & More Inc., Civ. No. CGC- 493678) and also include the following information: (1) name, address, and telephone number of the Settlement Class Member; (2) all grounds for the objection, including any legal support the Settlement Class Member or his or her counsel wish to assert; (3) if represented by counsel, the name, address, and telephone number of all counsel who represent the Settlement Class Member; (4) a statement confirming whether the Settlement Class Member or counsel plan to appear at the Final Approval Hearing; (5) the name, address, and telephone number of any counsel that will appear at the Final Approval Hearing; and (6) the number of times the Settlement Class Member and his or her attorney (if applicable) have filed an objection to a class action settlement in the previous five years and the identity of the case and the nature and outcome of each objection. 9. What am I giving up to get relief as a Settlement Class Member? Unless you exclude yourself, you will remain in the Settlement Class. That means that if the Settlement is approved by the Court, you and all Settlement Class Members will release (agreeing never to sue, continue to sue, or be part of any other lawsuit) all claims against BevMo and the other Released Parties (as defined above in the response to Question No. 5) in connection with your purchase of one or more two-bottle sets of wine from BevMo in California pursuant to a 5 Cent Sale during the Class Period, except that you do not release the Released Parties from any claim or action to enforce the Settlement Agreement. It also means that all of the Court s orders will apply to you and legally bind you. Unless you exclude yourself, it also means you will accept one or more Discount Coupons as the sole recovery you will receive in connection with your purchase of a two-bottle set of wine from BevMo in California pursuant to a 5 Cent Sale during the Class Period. If you do not exclude yourself from the Settlement you will be considered to have agreed to the release of claims unless you exclude yourself from the Settlement by following the instructions in the answer to Question No. 10 below. Also, if you previously filed a timely, valid request for exclusion (an Opt-Out Form ), then you are not a member of the Settlement Class. 10. How do I get out of the Settlement? If you do not want to be part of this Settlement, and you want to keep the right to sue or continue to sue BevMo on your own based on the legal claims raised in this Action, then you must take steps to get out of the Settlement. This is called excluding yourself from or opting out of the Settlement. To exclude yourself from the Settlement, you must send a letter or email to Lead Class Counsel stating you want to be excluded as a Settlement Class Member in the lawsuit entitled Gray v. Beverages & More Inc., Civ. No. CGC-493678, or you can submit an online Opt-Out Form at the website www.fivecentsalesettlement.com. Be sure to include your name, address and telephone number. Opt-Out Forms submitted by email or via the settlement website must be submitted on or before July 13, 2015. 7

Opt-Out Forms submitted by mail must be postmarked no later than July 13, 2015 and sent to Lead Class counsel at the address in this Notice. You cannot exclude yourself by telephone. If you properly exclude yourself, you will not receive a settlement payment in the form of a Discount Coupon, you cannot object to the Settlement, and you will not be legally bound by anything that happens in this Action. 11. If I do not exclude myself, can I sue BevMo for the same thing later? No. Unless you exclude yourself, you give up any right to sue BevMo for the claims that this Settlement resolves. If you have a pending lawsuit, speak to your lawyer in that case immediately, since you may have to exclude yourself from this Settlement Class to continue your own lawsuit. 12. Do I have a lawyer in this case? Yes. The Court appointed lawyers to represent you and the other Settlement Class Members. These lawyers are known as plaintiff s counsel, and in this notice they are also called Lead Class Counsel. If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense. Individuals who choose to opt out of the settlement will not be represented by Lead Class Counsel. 13. How will the lawyers be paid? Lead Class Counsel have spent time and money litigating this Action on a contingent fee basis. That means they have paid for the expenses of the litigation themselves with the expectation that if they are successful in obtaining relief for a class of persons, they will receive attorneys fees and be reimbursed for their litigation expenses by BevMo. This is customary in this type of litigation. Lead Class Counsel will not receive attorneys fees or be reimbursed for their litigation expenses unless ordered by the Court. Therefore, Lead Class Counsel will file a motion asking the Court at the Final Approval Hearing to make an award of attorneys fees and costs. They will ask for an amount up to $296,000 to cover costs of litigation and settlement and attorneys fees. They will also ask for an award to the Named Plaintiff in the amount of $1,000, and any taxes. The Court may award less than these amounts. Any amounts awarded by the Court will be paid by BevMo. 14. What is the difference between objecting and requesting exclusion? Objecting is appearing in the case and asking the Court not to approve the Settlement because you do not believe it is fair. If the Court agrees with you, there will not be any Settlement and you and the other class members will not receive anything under the Settlement Agreement. Requesting exclusion or opting out is telling the Court you do not want to be part of the Settlement Class and Settlement Agreement. If you exclude yourself by submitting an Opt-Out Form, you cannot object to the Settlement because it no longer concerns you. 15. Additional Information. You can get more information by contacting Lead Class Counsel. This Notice is a summary and does not describe all of the details of the Settlement Agreement. For full details of the matters discussed in this notice, you may want to review the Settlement Agreement, which is posted at www.fivecentsalesettlement.com. That website also contains detailed instructions on how to update your contact information, as well as an opt-out form for those who wish to exclude themselves 8

from the settlement. Note that the Settlement Agreement posted on the website contains examples of the advertising changes that BevMo has made, and that will be made permanent under the Settlement. The Settlement Agreement is also filed with the Court, and may be inspected during business hours, at the office of the Civil Clerk of the Court, San Francisco Superior Court, 400 McAllister St., Room 103, San Francisco, California 94102. The case is entitled Gray v. Beverages & More Inc., Civ. No. CGC-493678. The Court s on-line docket is located at http://www.sfsuperiorcourt.org/onlineservices. PLEASE DO NOT CALL OR WRITE TO THE COURT FOR INFORMATION OR ADVICE DATED: April 14, 2015 BY ORDER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9