WIND TURBINES AND INFRASOUND

Similar documents
ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT PUBNICO POINT WIND FARM, NOVA SCOTIA

LOW FREQUENCY NOISE AND INFRASOUND FROM WIND TURBINE GENERATORS: A LITERATURE REVIEW

Noise from large wind turbines (with focus on low frequencies)

The Effects of Ultrasonic Sound Generated by Ultrasonic Cleaning Systems on Human Hearing and Physiology

Noise. Patrick N. Breysse, PhD, CIH Peter S.J. Lees, PhD, CIH. Johns Hopkins University

How Noise is Generated by Wind Turbines The mechanisms of noise generation. Malcolm Hayes Hayes McKenzie Partnership Ltd Machynlleth & Salisbury

Building Design for Advanced Technology Instruments Sensitive to Acoustical Noise

Interference to Hearing Aids by Digital Mobile Telephones Operating in the 1800 MHz Band.

Dr. Abdel Aziz Hussein Lecturer of Physiology Mansoura Faculty of Medicine

Acoustic Terms, Definitions and General Information

Sound Pressure Measurement

As a minimum, the report must include the following sections in the given sequence:

Trigonometric functions and sound

ACOUSTICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR EFFECTIVE EMERGENCY ALARM SYSTEMS IN AN INDUSTRIAL SETTING

There s power in wind: fact sheet

Estimation of Loudness by Zwicker's Method

Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection

Sound Quality Aspects for Environmental Noise. Abstract. 1. Introduction

Infrasound levels near windfarms and in other environments

Wind Turbine Sound and Health Effects An Expert Panel Review Executive Summary

KRUGER ENERGY CHATHAM WIND PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING REPORT / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT. Appendix E. Environmental Noise Impact Assessment

INFLUENCE ANALYSIS OF SMALL REPOWERED WIND POWER PLANTS ON THE RELIABILITY OF THE LOCAL GRID

The results of hum studies in the United States

Acoustic and Visual Impacts of a 0.25 MW WTG at Huasai, Nakhon Si Thammarat in Southern Thailand

Difference in levels of groundborne noise and vibrations between the T-1300 and MX-3000 metro trains in Oslo

6th International Meeting on Wind Turbine Noise Glasgow April 2015 Wind Turbines A Changed Environment

PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY Andrew P. McGrath, AuD

The development of renewable energy, including wind, solar, and

Schindler 3300 / Schindler 5300 Information on noise and vibration.

ENVIRONMENTALLY PREFERABLE POWER CHALLENGES TO DEVELOPMENT:

EVALUATING WAVE FILES TO DETERMINE THE SEVERITY OF THE ULTRASONIC EMISSIONS

1) The time for one cycle of a periodic process is called the A) wavelength. B) period. C) frequency. D) amplitude.

Façade acoustic design strategy Proposed residential development Irvin Avenue, Saltburn

What Audio Engineers Should Know About Human Sound Perception. Part 2. Binaural Effects and Spatial Hearing

Comparative study of the commercial software for sound quality analysis

INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS OF PART-TIME WORK

Resonance in a Closed End Pipe

AP1 Waves. (A) frequency (B) wavelength (C) speed (D) intensity. Answer: (A) and (D) frequency and intensity.

The Potential Health Impact of Wind Turbines

IMO ANY OTHER BUSINESS. Shipping noise and marine mammals. Submitted by the United States

Teaching Fourier Analysis and Wave Physics with the Bass Guitar

Hearing Conservation Program

Noise: Impact on Hearing; Regulation

Welcome to the United States Patent and TradeMark Office

Adolescents and Hearing Impairment

CASE STUDY. University of Windsor, Canada Modal Analysis and PULSE Reflex. Automotive Audio Systems PULSE Software including PULSE Reflex, Transducers

SYSTEM DESIGN AND THE IMPORTANCE OF ACOUSTICS

In the matter of the Dundonnell Wind Farm EES Planning Panels Victoria Proponent: Trustpower Australia Holdings Pty Ltd

Audiometry and Hearing Loss Examples

Basic Concepts of Sound. Contents: Definitions db Conversion Sound Fields db ± db

Noise. CIH Review PDC March 2012

Assessment of low-frequency noise due to windturbines in relation to low-frequency background

A METHOD FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF SOUNDS AS PERCEIVED SEPARATELY FROM THEIR BACKGROUND

General Thoughts on Generator Set - Acoustic Solutions & Noise Control

Tumbler Ridge Wind Energy Project 907 March, 2011

Audio Examination. Place of Exam:

Once you know the volume of air and the static pressure of the system to be cooled, you can determine the fan specifications for your product.

Active noise control in practice: transformer station

INTERNATIONAL ANNEX III. Technical Details of Sound Signal Appliances

EMC STANDARDS STANDARDS AND STANDARD MAKING BODIES. International. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)

Copyright 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.

Waves Sound and Light

Noise Assessment For Proposed EfW & IBA Facility. Paving Way North Hykeham Lincolnshire. For. Fichtner Consulting Engineers. Acting on Behalf of

The loudness war is fought with (and over) compression

Noise Design Advice. Noise can be a major factor to consider in any new development.

Convention Paper Presented at the 118th Convention 2005 May Barcelona, Spain

Ultrasound Condition Monitoring

Which is Safer Tonal or Broadband Reversing Alarms?

Sound Quality Evaluation of Hermetic Compressors Using Artificial Neural Networks

Aalborg Universitet. Publication date: Document Version Author final version (often known as postprint)

Massachusetts Wind and Noise Technical Advisory Group Status Report

Hearing Tests And Your Child

Hearing Tests And Your Child

OAK GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT. Hearing Conservation Program

TECHNICAL LISTENING TRAINING: IMPROVEMENT OF SOUND SENSITIVITY FOR ACOUSTIC ENGINEERS AND SOUND DESIGNERS

Comparison of predicted and measured wind farm noise levels and implications for assessments of new wind farms

Sound Perception. Sensitivity to Sound. Sensitivity to Sound 1/9/11. Not physically sensitive to all possible sound frequencies Range

UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT

The Disability Tax Credit Certificate Tip sheet for Audiologists

Basic Acoustics and Acoustic Filters

Audible Alarm Basics Everything you wanted to know, but were afraid to ask by Dan O Brien, Sales Engineer, Mallory Sonalert Products, Inc.

Western University. Hearing Protection Program. Prepared by: Occupational Health and Safety

Noise associated with the ground water systems serving residential geothermal heat pumps

Acoustical Design of Rooms for Speech

The Sonometer The Resonant String and Timbre Change after plucking

The Regulation is established pursuant to 3 (4) and 6 (6) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act. Chapter 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

K2 CW Filter Alignment Procedures Using Spectrogram 1 ver. 5 01/17/2002

ACOUSTICS TESTED WINDOWS & DOORS

7. Beats. sin( + λ) + sin( λ) = 2 cos(λ) sin( )

Nonverbal Factors in Influence

Workshop Perceptual Effects of Filtering and Masking Introduction to Filtering and Masking

Aircraft cabin noise synthesis for noise subjective analysis

Determination of source parameters from seismic spectra

S-822. Noise and Hearing Conservation RISK MANAGEMENT

Waves: Recording Sound Waves and Sound Wave Interference (Teacher s Guide)

Pure Tone Hearing Screening in Schools: Revised Notes on Main Video. IMPORTANT: A hearing screening does not diagnose a hearing loss.

EWEA Technology Workshop: Wind Turbine Sound 2014, Malmö Noise Protection Regulations for Wind Turbines in Germany

Case Study 5 Use of Wind Turbine Technology

This document describes how engineered sounds for control system alarms improve Operator responsiveness.

Flicker happens. But does it have to?

Transcription:

WIND TURBINES AND INFRASOUND SUBMITTED TO: Canadian Wind Energy Association (CanWEA) Suite 320, 220 Laurier Avenue West Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1P 5Z9 SUBMITTED BY: Howe Gastmeier Chapnik Limited (HGC Engineering) 2000 Argentia Road Plaza 1, Suite 203 Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 1P7 Contact: Brian Howe, MEng, MBA, PEng November 29, 2006

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HGC Engineering was retained by the Canadian Wind Energy Association to address the issue of infrasound in relation to wind farms and its potential effects on residences. Infrasound is sound that occurs at a frequency below that generally considered detectable by human hearing. There are various ways to define the magnitude of infrasound, one of which is the G-weighting network, dbg, designated by ISO specifically to deal with infrasound. G-weighted sound levels of 85 dbg and lower are not sufficient to create human perception. Infrasonic levels created by wind turbines are often similar to the ambient levels prevalent in the natural environment due to wind, typically 85 dbg or lower, and there is no evidence of adverse health effects caused by this infrasound. Infrasound near modern wind turbines is generally not perceptible to humans, either through auditory or non-auditory mechanisms. There is often an audible swoosh created by wind turbines, which is essentially broadband noise whose amplitude is modulated at a low frequency, but this should not be mistakenly confused with infrasound. All in all, based on Canadian and international studies, infrasound generated by wind turbines should not be considered a concern to the health of nearby residences. i

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... i 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 2. CRITERIA FOR INFRASOUND... 2 3. INFRASOUND PRODUCED BY WIND TURBINES... 4 4. AUDIBLE CHARACTERISTICS OF WIND TURBINES... 6 5. CONCLUSIONS...8 Figure 1: Figure 2: Spectrogram of Sound Pressure Levels Measured near a Vestas 1.8 MW Wind Turbine Generator Spectrogram of Sound Pressure Levels Measured near a GE 1.5 MW Wind Turbine Generator ii

Canadian Wind Energy Association Page 1 1. INTRODUCTION Howe Gastmeier Chapnik Limited (HGC Engineering) was retained by the Canadian Wind Energy Association to address infrasound and determine if it is an issue of concern for the wind energy industry in Canada. Sound is generated by wind turbines and is routinely addressed when placing wind farms near residential land uses. As a subset of sound broadly defined as any airborne pressure fluctuation that can be sensed by humans there is infrasound. Infrasound is defined as a wave phenomenon of the same physical nature as sound but with frequencies below the range of human hearing. Generally, hearing via the auditory nervous system is often considered to be limited at the low end to frequencies above 20 Hz. However, although infrasound may not be heard based on the normal meaning of the word, under certain circumstances it can be perceived by humans; there is some degree of auditory perception below frequencies of 20 Hz and there are non-auditory mechanisms such as the vestibular balance system and the resonant excitation of body cavities by which humans can sense infrasound. Infrasound from wind turbines has been a contentious issue on occasion. The Toronto Star published an article 1 in November 2006 indicting that a family left their house alleging a health concern from inaudible sounds produced at the Pubnico Point Wind Farm in Nova Scotia. On the other hand, an article in the June 2006 issue of the Journal of the Canadian Acoustical Association 2 presented a technical study suggesting that infrasound was not an issue. This paper is written to address issues related to infrasound, clarifying some misconceptions and focusing discussions in a meaningful direction. This paper raises, and attempts to answer, three pertinent questions: 1. At what levels does infrasound pose an issue with respect to health or annoyance for humans? 2. Do modern wind turbines produce infrasound, and if so at what level? 3. Are there acoustic phenomena and characteristics associated with wind turbines that could be mistaken for infrasound, and do they present a hazard?

Canadian Wind Energy Association Page 2 2. CRITERIA FOR INFRASOUND Infrasound, at a certain level, is prevalent everywhere in the natural environment: people are continually subjected to sound at infrasonic frequencies. Natural sources of infrasound include wind and breaking waves, and there are a wide range of man-made sources such as industrial processes, vehicles and HVAC systems in buildings. The magnitude of sound, as well as infrasound, is customarily measured and reported in terms of decibels (db) relative to a reference of 20 micropascal. Another important characteristic used to describe sound is the frequency at which the pressure oscillations occur, expressed in Hertz (Hz). There are a variety of weighting networks that are used to adjust sound levels as a function of frequency depending on the purpose. The A-weighting network is commonly used to adjust sound levels to approximate the sensitivity of human hearing making it is an inappropriate descriptor for infrasound. It is far better to use un-weighted (linear) decibel levels, and compare them to un-weighted criterion levels as a function of frequency, or to use the G-weighting network defined by ISO to specifically deal with infrasound, and compare G-weighted levels to criterion expressed in dbg. Microphones and instrumentation are readily available to measure infrasound and there are International Standards 3 4 that define these procedures. In regard to environmental noise, most jurisdictions do not present specific assessment criteria for noise at infrasonic frequencies, as acoustic problems involving infrasound are not common. Various papers and reports dealing with low frequency noise in general, and investigations of low frequency noise produced by wind turbines specifically, have been published in recent years. Hearing thresholds, below which infrasound is generally not discerned through auditory or nonauditory perception have been documented by various researchers including Berglund and Hassmen 5, and Watanabe and Møller 6. These papers present spectral curves, with sound levels as a function of frequency, which indicate perception limits for pure tones. These perception limits vary from about 100 db (linear) at 5 Hz down to 80 db (linear) at 20 Hz.

Canadian Wind Energy Association Page 3 Various reports and papers also suggest acceptable G-weighted sound levels, including a report from the University of Massachusetts 7 in 2006 that suggests threshold levels on the order of 100 dbg at 10 Hz. A report prepared for the British Government 8 in 2003 suggests that sound levels below 85 to 90 dbg are not sufficient to create human perception. Allowing for the statistical variation associated with the varying sensitivity of people would seem appropriate when defining the lower, conservative, bound for the criteria. The Environmental Protection Agency in Denmark 9 has developed criteria for infrasound in general (not just for wind turbines) of 85 dbg, explicitly allowing a 10 db factor for people more sensitive than the norm. In terms of health, at sufficiently high levels, infrasound can be dangerous and create serious health, visual and motor control problems. However, it is grossly inaccurate to conclude that infrasound, at any level, causes health risks. Infrasound poses a concern in regard to manned space flights, and studies prepared for NASA 10 suggest no significant effects from infrasound until the level exceeds 125 db (linear). The University of Massachusetts study noted above concluded that there is no reliable evidence that infrasound below the hearing threshold produced physiological or psychological effect. Utilizing the perception criteria essentially provides conservative criteria for health effects. In summary, making the worst case assumption that someone will be annoyed if they can perceive infrasound, an infrasonic sound level criterion in the range of 85 dbg is appropriate to ensure there are no adverse impacts.

Canadian Wind Energy Association Page 4 3. INFRASOUND PRODUCED BY WIND TURBINES In assessing whether or not wind turbines are capable of producing infrasound there is the practical difficulty of trying to separate the influence of the wind turbines from the influence of the wind. The turbines operate when there is wind, and that wind by itself creates infrasound. A study completed by HGC Engineering for the Pubnico Point Wind Farm 11 was inconclusive in separating the infrasonic sound due to the wind turbines from the interference of wind and/or wave action in the Atlantic Ocean. The linear sound levels in the frequency range from 5 to 25 Hz were typically 60 db, whether one was close to the Vestas V80 1.8 MW turbines or far from them. The overall G-weighted levels were 79 dbg at 60 m from a turbine, 81 dbg at 330 m, and 74 dbg at 700 m. Nonetheless, the study showed that, regardless of the source of the infrasound and the distance from the wind turbines, the infrasonic levels were below perception or annoyance criteria. A noise study 12 for the Zagórze Wind Farm in Poland, consisting of fifteen Vestas V80 turbines, produced results comparable to the measurements conducted by HGC Engineering. Sound level measurements were conducted at various locations 100 m from a turbine and the maximum overall G-weighted level was determined to be 75 dbg. HGC Engineering had a better opportunity to separate infrasonic sound levels due to a wind turbine from the ambient levels at a site in Ontario. Overall G-weighted sound levels were measured to be 80 dbg at 60 m, 67 dbg at 300 m, and 59 dbg at a distance greater than 3 km from a GE 1.5 MW turbine. Another infrasound study 13 relevant to this paper was conducted for the Castle River Wind Farm in Alberta. The wind farm is comprised of fifty-nine 660 kw wind turbines and one 600 kw wind turbine. The results of that measurement program suggest that, under high wind conditions, the maximum infrasound level was 91 dbg at 50 m, versus an ambient level of 83 dbg, while at 1 km the maximum level was 84 dbg versus an ambient of 82 dbg. Under low wind

Canadian Wind Energy Association Page 5 conditions, the maximum infrasound level was 72 dbg at 50 m, versus an ambient level of 51 dbg, while at 1 km the maximum level was 69 dbg versus an ambient level of 62 dbg. The study concluded that infrasound is present near the turbines, but is not a significant concern. As an aside, HGC Engineering has investigated and addressed situations where infrasound was problematic; a residential area near a 30 MW low speed diesel engine in the Caribbean, and a waste glass processing plant in Germany that made extensive use of vibrating screens and shakers. In both instances the levels were tonal (at a single frequency) and much higher than the perception criteria noted above, but interestingly enough the issue was not human response. Rather, windows and light fixtures whose natural frequencies matched the excitation frequency visibly shook. Based on the above, it is reasonable to conclude that modern wind turbines in the power range prevalent at wind farms in Canada produce infrasound. Often the levels are sufficiently masked by ambient infrasonic levels due to other sources, but not always. In terms of infrasonic sound levels, overall levels on the order of 80 to 90 dbg would typically be expected close to the wind turbines, falling off with distance from the wind turbines. At the closest distances at which residences are typically located near large wind turbines, approximately 300 m, the infrasonic levels are low enough to not be of concern. In any event, the discussion of whether or not infrasound poses a health risk at low levels is somewhat academic since, in the absence of wind turbines, comparable infrasonic levels are present in the natural environment. In summary, there is no evidence to suggest that infrasound from wind turbines cause issues with respect to human perception or health. This is consistent with the studies already cited in this paper along with studies published in Britain 14, Australia 15, and New Zealand 16.

Canadian Wind Energy Association Page 6 4. AUDIBLE CHARACTERISTICS OF WIND TURBINES If the infrasound near wind farms is not perceptible, the question remains whether there are audible characteristics that could be perceived, albeit mistakenly, as infrasound. The noise produced by air interacting with the turbine blades tends to be broadband noise, but is amplitude modulated at the blade pass frequency (the number of blades times the revolution rate), resulting in a characteristic swoosh. The spectrograph attached as Figure 1 illustrates the swoosh measured near a typical Vestas V80 wind turbine generator. The various colours represent the A- weighted magnitude of the sound as function of time, along the horizontal axis, and frequency, along the vertical axis. The spectrograph shows an amplitude modulation frequency of about 0.8 Hz, and illustrates that the sound of the wind turbine generator was most noticeable in the 250 to 1000 Hz range. Figure 2 presents a similar spectrograph measured near a GE 1.5 MW wind turbine generator. One could mistakenly conclude that a sound level being modulated at a frequency on the order of one Hertz must be infrasound since the modulation frequency is less than 20 Hz. However, in this case the sound pressure waves that one is hearing contain a wide range of frequencies (i.e. broadband) with a maximum on the order of 1000 Hz; it is only the overall level that rises and falls at a low frequency rate. The low frequency modulation of broadband audible sound does not equal the presence of infrasound. Other interesting phenomena can occur when more than one wind turbine is near a point of reception. The frequency of modulation can change and vary, since any two wind turbines do not have to rotate at the same frequency or in phase. The amplitude of the modulation can also vary if the sound of the wind turbines begins beating together. The amplitude modulation does not make the sound louder, but based on psychoacoustic research 17 the perceived or subjective loudness increases in relation to the level of the amplitude

Canadian Wind Energy Association Page 7 modulation and this effect is most noticeable for modulation frequencies centered near 4 Hz. Thus, the audible swoosh can be expected to increase one s awareness of the noise from wind turbines, and can potentially increase one s annoyance. The audible sound levels near wind turbines are, at worse, on par with sound levels experienced by the vast segment of the Canadian population that live near transportation sources and, in fact, the audible noise from a series of individual cars passing on a roadway can also display the same amplitude modulated characteristic. There is a wide body of research indicating that audible sound at this level poses no health concerns.

Canadian Wind Energy Association Page 8 5. CONCLUSIONS Infrasound is a wave phenomenon of the same physical nature as sound but with frequencies below the range of human hearing, although it can be perceived to a certain extent if the levels are high enough. HGC Engineering has assessed the issue of infrasound in relation to wind turbines. In terms of human exposure to infrasound, maintaining G-weighted sound levels in the range of 85 dbg or lower are appropriate to ensure that there are no adverse impacts. Wind turbines are capable of generating infrasound but often the levels of infrasound near the wind turbine generators are similar to the ambient infrasound levels prevalent in the natural environment due to wind, waves, and industrial and transportation sources. Studies completed near Canadian wind farms, as well as international experience, suggest that the levels of infrasound near modern wind turbines, with rated powers common in large scale wind farms are in general not perceptible to humans, either through auditory or non-auditory mechanisms. Additionally, there is no evidence of adverse health effects due to infrasound from wind turbines. The audible sound from wind turbines has a characteristic audible swoosh, which is essentially higher frequency broadband noise that is amplitude modulated at a low frequency. This low rate of modulation should not be mistakenly identified as infrasound even though it may increase the subjective loudness and potential annoyance. All in all, while infrasound can be generated by wind turbines, it is concluded that infrasound is not of concern to the health of residences located nearby.

Canadian Wind Energy Association Page 9 Figure 1: Spectrogram of Sound Pressure Levels Measured near a Vestas 1.8 MW Wind Turbine Generator.

Canadian Wind Energy Association Page 10 Figure 2: Spectrogram of Sound Pressure Levels Measured near a GE 1.5 MW Wind Turbine Generator.

Canadian Wind Energy Association Page 11 1 Keller, James. Silent sound of the wind too strong for family. Toronto Star 13 November 2006: A7. 2 Leventhall, Geoff. Infrasound from Wind Turbines Fact, Fiction or Deception. Canadian Acoustics 34.2 (June 2006). 3 Wind Turbine Generator Systems Part 11: Acoustic noise measurement techniques. IEC 61400-11, 2002. 4 Acoustics Frequency-weighting characteristic for infrasound measurements. ISO 7196:1995(E), International Standards Organization, 1995. 5 Berglund, Birgitta and Hassmen, Peter. Sources and effects of low-frequency noise. Acoustical Society of America. 99.5 (May 1996). 6 Watanabe, T., and Møller, H. (1990b): Low frequency hearing thresholds in pressure field and free field. Jnl Low Freq Noise Vibn 9, 106-115. 7 Rogers, Anthony L. Wind Turbine Noise, Infrasound and Noise Perception. University of Massachusetts, 18 January 2006. 8 Leventhall, G., Report for Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. A Review of Published Research on Low Frequency Noise and its Effects. London, 2003. 9 Miljøstyrelsen, Information no. 9/1997 from the Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Orientering om lavfrekvent støj, infralyd og vibrationer i eksternt miljø. 1997. 10 Kryter, Karl D. The Effects of Noise on Man, Second Edition. Florida: Academic Press Inc., 1985. 11 Howe, Brian and McCabe, Nick. Environmental Noise Assessment Pubnico Point Wind Farm, Nova Scotia, August 2006 12 Golec, M., et al (2005). Noise of Wind Power Turbine V80 in a Farm Operation. First International Meeting on Wind Turbine Noise: Perspectives for Control, October 17-18. Berlin. 13 Hepburn, Howard G. Acoustic and Geophysical Measurement of Infrasound from Wind Farm Turbines. Canadian Acoustics 34.2 (June 2006). 14 Bass, Jeremy, et al. Low Frequency Noise in Wind Turbines. The British Wind Energy Association. 15 The Noise Emissions Associated with Wind Farming in Australia. Australian Wind Energy Association, May 2004. 16 Bellhouse, George. Low Frequency Noise and Infrasound from Wind Turbine Generators. New Zealand: Bel Acoustic Consulting, 30 June 2004. 17 Zwicker, E., and Fastl H. Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models. Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1990.