MERIDEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS. STANDARDS-BASED REPORT CARDS Grades K-5 HANDBOOK

Similar documents
Standard Two: Knowledge of Mathematics: The teacher shall be knowledgeable about mathematics and mathematics instruction.

January Dear Parents and Guardians,

NWEA. and the Common Core. Presenter: Laura Riley NWEA

CURRICULUM MAP. Elementary and Early Childhood Program: Alignment of Student Learning Outcomes, Standards, and Assessments

Description of Services

Autism Spectrum Disorder Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria Rubric

Japanese International School. Assessment Recording and Reporting Policy

Procedures and Guidelines New Hampshire s Highly Qualified Teacher Requirements No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) 2001

North Shore Schools. Elementary Standards-Based Report Card Parent Guide

Requirements & Guidelines for the Preparation of the New Mexico Online Portfolio for Alternative Licensure

Part 3: Summary of Performance essential Accommodation Modification Assistive Technology

Planning Commentary Respond to the prompts below (no more than 9 single-spaced pages, including prompts).

I can not live without books.

Fair dismissal district means any common or union high school district or education service district.

S=Specific, M=Measurable, A=Appropriate, R=Realistic & Rigorous, T=Timebound

STRATEGIC SCHOOL PROFILE Middle and Junior High School Edition. Great Oak School. Oxford School District

APPENDIX A: Examples of Observations and Documentation

Program Overview. This guide discusses Language Central for Math s program components, instructional design, and lesson features.

Preparing for the Provincial Grade 9 EQAO Math Assessment A Resource Guide for Students and Parents

Program Models. proficiency and content skills. After school tutoring and summer school available

North Carolina TEACHER. evaluation process. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction

1. Department of Curriculum and Instruction ELE 499 Course Title: Supervised Student Teaching in Primary Through Fifth Grade Credit Hours: 12

Course Overview Name of Course: Child Care I Name of Department: Family and Consumer Science

Pre-service Performance Assessment Professional Standards for Teachers: See 603 CMR 7.08

DRIVING INSTRUCTION THROUGH DATA WITHOUT DATA IT IS JUST AN OPINION

The Ohio Resident Educator Program Standards Planning Tool Final

NW COLORADO BOCES ALTERNATIVE LICENSURE PROGRAM

Alignment of the Hawaii Preschool Content Standards With HighScope s Preschool Child Observation Record (COR), 2nd edition

NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

Michigan Merit Curriculum High School Graduation Requirements

Local Government and Leaders Grade Three

BUILDING CURRICULUM ACCOMMODATION PLAN

Q Comp Requirements and Guiding Principles

Teacher Generated Examples of Artifacts and Evidence. Criterion Element Example Artifacts/ Evidence

The Elementary Education Program Brandeis University Waltham, MA 02454

Present Level statements must: Goals and Objectives Progress Reporting. How Progress will be determined: Goals must be: 12/3/2013

Orange County Public Schools. State Accountability System September 2, 2014

Sample Student Learning Objectives

Preschool For All Program Evaluation TEACHER SELF EVALUATION

Evaluating the School Strategic Plan Components Title I Rubric for Schoolwide Projects

Peck Full Service Community School Improvement Plan Principal: Justin Cotton Jr.

Ohio s State Tests Information for Students and Families

Improve your English and increase your employability with EN Campaigns

Louisiana Special Education Guidance

Teaching All Students to Read: With Strong Intervention Outcomes

New Jersey. Alternate Proficiency Assessment (APA) Parent Information Guide

Standards: What does it mean to Community College Faculty? General Overview & Panel Discussion. OhioMATYC April 12, 2013

Curriculum Development, Revision, and Evaluation Processes

Mathematics Policy. Michael Sobell Sinai School

Nevis Public School District #308. District Literacy Plan Minnesota Statute 120B.12, Learning together... Achieving quality together.

I. Teacher Preparation. A. Elementary School Licensure Requirements. 1. Licensure Grade Levels. 2. Early Elementary Elementary Education 2

Creative Ideas: Enhanced to Meet Special Needs of Students

NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS

A GUIDE TO THE SHIFTS IN THE ELA COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS

State of Colorado K-12 Mandate

Allen Elementary School

Comprehensive Reading Plan K-12 A Supplement to the North Carolina Literacy Plan. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

Art & Music Five Year Plan. Program Review, Research & Recommendations Chris McCullough, Supervisor Fine & Applied Arts June, 2012

P-3: Create objective-driven lesson plans

Section 7: The Five-Step Process for Accommodations for English Language Learners (ELLs)

[division name] Grades 7 and 8 Report Card. [school name]

TOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES

Expeditionary Learning at King Middle School. June 18, 2009

Instructionally Appropriate IEPs. A Skills Based Approach to IEP Development Division of Special Populations

Minnesota Academic Standards

Elementary Enhanced Learning in Peel Parent Information

ETR PR-06 Form. Annotations for the New. Contents. Using the ETR Form document. Evaluation Team Report

To date, more than 45 states and the District of Columbia have adopted the CCSS.

RtI Response to Intervention

Assessment That Drives Instruction

TAS Instructional Program Design/ Scientifically-based Instructional Strategies

FRAMEWORK FOR EFFECTIVE TEACHING. Newark Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation

Gifted & Talented Program Description

Elementary Math Methods Syllabus

Pre-Requisites EDAM-5001 Early Literacy Guiding Principles and Language

A study of the effectiveness of National Geographic Science

TEAM PLANNING AND REPORTING

New Hampshire Department of Education Special Education Program Approval and Improvement Process

Standards for Certification in Early Childhood Education [ ]

ATLANTA SPEECH SCHOOL 3160 Northside Parkway, NW Atlanta, GA LEARNING LAB Middle School/High School Questionnaire

Tools to Use in Assessment

Geographic Area - Humboldt Park

Family & Consumer Science Curriculum Review West St. Paul Mendota Heights Eagan Area Schools School District 197

THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY. Add on Certification Program English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) Endorsement

College and Career Readiness Instructor Certification Course Catalog

Tackling the NEW Teacher Evaluation Guidelines

date by June Key initiatives included: Paraprofessionals and Academic specialists

A Family Guide to Response to Intervention (RtI)

Wappingers Central School District

Special Education Program Descriptions

ty School District Digita al Classrooms Plan

Correlation Map of LEARNING-FOCUSED to Marzano s Evaluation Model

Ministry of Education Course Title: Learning Strategies 1: Skills For Success in Secondary School

Executive Summary. Anderson Early Childhood Center

Welcome To GATE Parent Information Night

Creating Strong Report Card Comments. A Handbook for Elementary Teachers

Developing Standards-Based IEP Goals and Objectives A DISCUSSION GUIDE

PARCC PARTNERSHIP FOR ASSESSMENT OF READINESS AND COLLEGE CAREERS. Hasbrouck Heights Middle School

Writing Learning Objectives that Engage Future Engineers: Hands-on & Minds-on Learning Activities

THE FOUR NON NEGOTIABLES

Transcription:

MERIDEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS STANDARDS-BASED REPORT CARDS Grades K-5 HANDBOOK

Table of Contents Reporting Process...4 Reporting System 5 Benefits of Standards-Based Reporting...5 Changes to the Reporting System.6 Principles of Grading...7 Academic Standard Expectations.....8-9 Guide to the Marking System...10 Overview of Content Achievement Criteria for Scoring....11 Modified Grade Level Expectations 12 FAQ.13 Glossary...14 2

Teaching and Learning Message Teachers in Meriden Public Schools are among the most highly skilled professional educators in the state. Their commitment to continuous learning has created classroom instruction that is exemplar in every respect. Because they will be teaching the district's standards- based curriculum with fidelity, standards-based grading is a natural complement to the work they do in the classroom daily. The older report card was designed before state standards and did not adequately reflect everyday practice. The elementary standards-based report card cross town collaboration committee met to suggest revisions and will continue to meet through the first year of implementation in order to provide support to teachers. We are confident that the new reporting system will meet the highest standards for accurately communicating student academic progress. Thank you in advance for your commitment to increased academic achievement for each of our students. 3

REPORTING PROCESS Reporting student progress occurs throughout the year and takes various forms. The overall process helps parents understand the topics studied in each learning area, the skills and concepts introduced, and the expected level of performance at each grade level. Progress reports will be discussed during December and March at parent conferences monitoring student progress of grade level goals. A final report card will be distributed in June which indicates student mastery of end of the year grade level goals. Meriden Public Schools Website http://www.meridenpublicschools.org ONGOING COMMUNICATION Open House Newsletters Phone/Email Conversations Samples of Student Work Parent Portal REPORTING PROCESS December Conference March Conference June Final Report Card ADDITIONAL RESOURCES Connecticut State Department of Education Common Core Documents http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards The link sends readers to a document that describes and lists the new national curriculum adopted by the Connecticut State Department of Education in July 2010. From here, readers may skim either the language arts (reading and writing) or math objectives expected within each grade level. Additional subject areas may be added in the future, based on legislative actions. Connecticut State Department of Education Standards and Grade Level Expectations http://www.sde.ct.gov/sde/cwp/view.asp?a=2618&q=320954 The link leads to the Connecticut State Department of Education curriculum home page. After choosing and clicking on a particular subject area on this page, the reader can examine the current state standards and grade level expectations for science, social studies, physical education, health, library, art, and music. 4

"By comparing one child's performance to a clear standard, parents, children, and teachers all know what is expected. Every time a student attempts a task, the performance is compared to the standard. " --Doug Reeves, 2004 STANDARDS-BASED REPORTING SYSTEM The purpose of the reporting system is to report separately: Student achievement based on content standards with end of the year expectations Student social development and work habits This handbook has been created to help teachers and parents better understand the new reporting system that is aligned with national and state standards. The Meriden Public School system values the partnership between home and school that supports the successful development of each child. Ongoing communication between teachers and parents is essential and the standards-based reporting system is another tool to promote communication. BENEFITS OF A STANDARDS-BASED REPORTING SYSTEM Measure what a student should know and be able to do by the end of each grade in each learning area. Identify the concepts and skills in each learning area based on these standards. Indicate what skills students have mastered, as well as their strengths and areas for growth. Progress will be reported for each of the grade level standards identified rather than a single grade each subject area. Alignment of the Meriden Public Schools curriculum to the national and state standards including assessments to measure learning and the extent to which students meet learning targets. Students, parents, and teachers work together toward shared goals to ensure that students make progress each year. Students will know exactly what is expected to master goals for a particular subject area and parents will be better able to support their child s learning at home. All teachers across the District will have the same expectations and common understandings about learning targets at each grade level and be able to build student knowledge based on student mastery of the previous year s grade level goals. 5

CHANGES TO THE REPORTING SYSTEM The progress reports and report cards will align to the Common Core Learning Standards and reflect updates to the Meriden Public Schools curriculum and instruction. The new report card will provide more information about how a child is progressing toward meeting the key standards expected at each grade level. Teachers will find the following elements in the new reporting system: 1. Reporting titles for each section of the report card that reflect the Connecticut and District standards for instruction. These standards are based on the Common Core Learning Standards. 2. Grading Keys will reflect the language in the Connecticut reporting system. The keys will define student progress toward the Common Core Learning Standards and be presented on a 4 point scale. 3. Alignment to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) which articulate what students should know and be able to do by the end of each grade level are aligned with 21 st Century college and career readiness expectations. How will CCSS help students? Prepare them to succeed in a global economy/society. Prepare them to apply knowledge and actively problem solve. Provide consistent focus on high level skills: reading, writing, speaking, listening and language. 6

PRINCIPLES OF GRADING 1. Reporting Should Be Based on Clearly Specified Learning Goals and Performance Standards a. All students in the same grade level in Meriden Public Schools, no matter their school, will be evaluated using the same standards. 2. Evidence Used for Grading Should Be Valid a. Students are assessed on what they are taught. 3. Grading Should Be Based on Established Criteria, Not on Arbitrary Norms a. On an assessment, students are graded on the standards assessed, not on arbitrary norms such as poor handwriting or no name on their paper. 4. Not Everything Should be Included in Grades a. Students are not graded as they are learning the information, but after the learning has occurred. Students need to have enough practice in order to be successful in the end result. Practice is learning time. 5. Avoid Grading Based on Averages a. Traditional mean grading: the average of all graded assignments b. Standards-based mode grading: the grade that appears the most often throughout a period of time 6. Focus on Achievement, and Report Other Factors Separately a. Students achievement should be the only aspect included in their grade. Students grades will reflect their achievement. However, their work habits and responsibilities will be reported separately 7

ACADEMIC STANDARD EXPECTATIONS Meriden Public Schools Standards-Based Reporting Systems include student evaluation and achievement information about different subject areas. Teachers base each student s evaluation on individual mastery of the learning objectives taught and practiced. Evaluation will be based on a standard rating that will indicate how closely each student comes to meeting the grade level standard. The following information describes academic content learning areas and topics evaluated in each subject area. English Language Arts Students end of the year achievement in English Language Arts is based on the following domains. Kindergarten-Grade 5 Reading Standards for Literature Reading Standards for Informational Text Reading Standards: Foundational Skills Writing Standards Speaking and Listening Standards Language Standards Specific grade level indicators are addressed within each domain. Each indicator will be assessed through a balance of content and standard-based formative assessments, performance tasks, and curriculum unit assessments. Progress will address grade level content and indicators specific to each reporting period. Math Students end of the year achievement in mathematics is based on the following domains. Kindergarten Grades 1-2 Grades 3-5 Counting & Cardinality Numbers & Operations in Base Ten Numbers & Operations in Base Ten Operations & Algebraic Thinking Operations & Algebraic Thinking Operations & Algebraic Thinking Numbers & Operation with Fractions Measurement & Data Measurement & Data Measurement & Data Geometry Geometry Geometry Specific grade level indicators are addressed within each domain. Each indicator will be assessed by a combination of formative assessments, performance tasks and curriculum unit assessments. Progress reports will address grade level content and indicators specific to each reporting period. 8

Science Student achievement in science is based on four content learning areas: Scientific Inquiry and Processes Physical, Life, and Earth/Space Science Social Studies Student achievement in social studies is based on four content learning areas: History, Civics and Government, Geography, and Economics Inquiry-based instruction Specialty Areas: Art, Music, and Physical Education, Technology, ESOL Student achievement is assessed on learning objectives based on state standards. Specific grade level skills are addressed within each category. SUGGESTIONS FOR PARENTS/CHILDREN AT HOME Keep communication open by asking your child about their day at school. Listen and comment on their answers. Be aware of their ongoing work and progress or concerns. Promote daily reading. Encourage your child s natural curiosity. Maintain open and on-going conversations with your child s teacher to understand your child s progress. Encourage responsibility and organizational habits with homework routines, which can help build strategies that will enable them to be independent learners. 9

GUIDE TO THE MARKING SYSTEM Academic Effort and Social Development indicators measure a student s ability to be an independent and learner and a responsible and productive member of the school and community. These expectations contribute to higher student learning gains. The indicators for the Academic Effort and Social Development Success are: Y = Yes I = Inconsistent N = No Academic Standard Indicators The following indicators are used to measure student achievement in all academic and specialty areas based on standards. Academic Descriptor Indicators 4 Exceeding grade level learning standards. 3 Meeting grade level learning standards 2 Progressing toward grade level learning standards. * 3 rd Term Exception: Student has progressed but did not meet grade level standard. He/she has shown growth and is still working toward the year end standard. 1 Not meeting grade level learning standards NA What it looks like in the classroom Student performance is characterized by extending what is taught. Application of skills and concepts is demonstrated with consistent accuracy and independence with a high level of quality and depth of understanding. Student performance is characterized by consistent mastery of grade level standards. The student understands and applies concepts and skills with minimal errors and support. Student performance indicates developing skills with some application within the grade level range. More reinforcement of skills is necessary to meet grade level standards, which may require additional support. Student performance varies in consistency with regard to accuracy and quality. Academic support and guidance are needed for understanding and demonstration of concepts and skills. Time and experience are required for grade level standards to develop. Skills not assessed at that time. While some learning standards will be addressed throughout the entire year, others will be phased in as the year progresses. 10

OVERVIEW OF CONTENT ACHIEVEMENT CRITERIA FOR SCORING (This is an overall description of student performance. It is not a description of performance on individual assessments.) Academic Indicator 1: Not Meeting Students at this level are beginning to identify concepts, vocabulary and/or use skills. They are unable to make connections among ideas or extend the information. While it might be expected that all students are performing at this level when learning begins, subsequent practice should lead to increased levels of performance. Academic Indicator 2: Progressing The difference between a Level 1 and a Level 2 student is the ability to demonstrate some understanding. At Level 2, a student can correctly identify some concepts and/or vocabulary, and/or use some skills. Students at Level 2 do not make connections among ideas nor are they able to demonstrate their learning without support. Academic Indicator 3: Meeting Level 3 represents those students who are independently able to meet the standards. Students who are performing at Level 3 understand and use concepts and/or vocabulary and/or skills independently. These students understand not just the what, but can correctly explain and/or demonstrate the how and why. Academic Indicator 4: Exceeding A student who is able to consistently perform at Level 4 is one who independently demonstrates extensions of his/her knowledge. Students should be able to create analogies and/or find connections, integrating areas of study. 11

MODIFIED GRADE LEVEL EXPECTATIONS Students with Disabilities All students must be graded according to grade level priority standards, in line with their peers, on the grade level progress reports and final report card. Proficiency levels given in the new standards-based reporting system must be based on expectations for that grade level. Students who have an I.E.P. (Individual Education Plan) or a Section 504 Accommodation Plan, may require modifications to the grade level objectives in one or more of the content areas. This means that the grade level objectives for this student will be different from the objectives for the other students in that grade. A check beside a standard on the progress reports and final report card indicates that the student s IEP or Section 504 Team has determined that the grade level objectives in that content area have been modified for this student. Teachers should refer to their child s IEP/Section 504 Plan and/or ask the student s special education teacher to collaborate when determining how the grade level objectives need to be modified for each student. The intent of a modified grade level objective is to give a more accurate report of a student s individual progress and academic achievement, even though he or she may not be achieving the grade level objectives. The goal is to have all students strive toward achieving the grade level objectives, but also to acknowledge that due to the impact of a disability, modifications that have been made to the objectives for this particular student. English Language Learners (ELL) All English Language Learners (ELL) must acquire the English skills necessary for academic success and ultimately for success in a global, multicultural, and multilingual society. Consequently, ELL student progress is recorded according to grade level priority standards in line with their peers in the new reporting system. Proficiency levels given in the new reporting system must be based on expectations for that grade level. The English Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) specialist in the building will consult with teachers when determining Academic Standard Indicators. Please note that students are expected to meet the same standards, and, as a result, a student who is still acquiring English skills may not reach that expected standard. However, if a student is making adequate progress in English, this will be noted in the new reporting system through Academic Standard Indicators. Over time, as the student acquires additional language and increased competency in reading and writing in English, s/he will most likely be able to meet the standards. 12

FAQ Why are only some of the standards listed on the progress reports and report card? Teams of teachers reviewed the Meriden Public Schools standards for each grade level in the process of developing the reporting system. In their review, the teachers chose the descriptors which were considered most significant for student growth in each subject area and at each grade level. These standards are often referred to as "priority standards." It does not mean that the other standards are less important, or that they will not be taught. In order to effectively communicate student progress, specific standards were selected to efficiently report growth during each of the three marking periods. What should the expectations for my child be? Remembering that every child learns differently, the goal for students is to reach a level 3-Proficient when the teacher has completed a topic. Can a student perform at a level 3 during one marking period and then receive a level 2 or 1 in subsequent marking periods? The expectations change from one marking period to another as the student moves toward the grade level expectations for the end of the year. As such, a student may find that expectations have increased in each marking period. This may result in very different levels of proficiency. A student could receive a 3 in the first marking period, and a level 2 or 1 in the subsequent marking periods Some areas on my child's report card were not evaluated this marking period and the report card shows N/A, or not applicable. Why wasn't this standard evaluated? Some standards will be taught each marking period. These standards will be assessed more frequently, and progress will be reported every marking period. The level of difficulty in the task and/or text may change, or the level of text complexity may change, making the expectation more demanding (i.e.: main idea). In other areas, the skill can progress to something more difficult. Other standards require an entire unit of study that may be unrelated to the current topic. In this case, the unit may be greyed out for a marking period since the skill may not have been assessed at that time. When the standard is taught, the standard is evaluated. 13

GLOSSARY OF KEY TERMS Academic Standard Indicators: The numbers 1 through 4 will be used on the standards based report card to indicate a student s level of understanding and performance. Assessment: Ongoing process by which teachers gather data to determine a student s progress relative to a standard. Formative Assessment: ongoing information about a student s progress in learning (e.g. homework, quizzes, conferencing, logs and journals, drafts, anecdotal observations). o Content Based: assessments consisting of selected responses and a short constructed response on the content taught that month/term o Standard-Based: assessments consisting of the same format as the content based, but measuring the understanding of the standard application Summative Assessments: end of unit information determining what students have learned (e.g. tests, performance tasks, projects, final writing pieces). Benchmark: A learning goal or target for a particular time in an academic year. Common Core Standards The Common Core State Standards provide a national consistent, clear understanding of what students are expected to learn, so teachers and parents know what they need to do to help them. The standards are designed to be robust and relevant to the real world, reflecting the knowledge and skills that our young people need for success in college and careers. With American students fully prepared for the future, our communities will be best positioned to compete successfully in the global economy. Mastery: A student has met or exceeded targets for a given learning goal in a content area or grade level. Performance Task: End of unit application of skills. Priority Standard: Learning objectives considered most significant for student gains in each subject area at each grade level. Rubric: A scoring tool used to rate a student s performance relative to the degree at which a standard has been met. Standard/Learning Objective: A statement that identifies the skill or concept that a student should know and be able to achieve at each grade level. 14

15