County of Los Angeles Consolidated Correctional Treatment Facilities June 09, 2015



Similar documents
JFA Institute Conducting Justice and Corrections Research for Effective Policy Making

Criminalization & Mental Illness: Next Steps & NAMI Advocacy

Evaluation of the Current and Future Los Angeles County Jail Population

Los Angeles County Sheriff s Department Inmate Services Bureau Education Based Incarceration Unit 1

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION

Denver Sheriff Department

Evaluation of the Current and Future Los Angeles County Jail Population

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE STATE

SANTA CLARA COUNTY REENTRY SERVICES SEAMLESS SYSTEM OF SERVICES, SUPPORT AND SUPERVISION Ready to Change: Promoting Safety and Health for the Whole

[Mental Health Treatment and Services*] [Chemical Dependency Program (CDP)]

All the Way Home: Re-entry and Housing. NAEH Conference July 13, 2005 Richard Cho

Automated Compliance Tracking of Inmate Entitlements Los Angeles County Sheriff s Department

BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND DETOXIFICATION - MEETING DEMAND FOR SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER MERCY HOSPITAL Publication Year: 2013

Division of Alcoholism and Chemical Dependency Programs

Department of Health Services. Alcohol and Other Drug Services Division

Evaluation of the San Diego County Community Corrections Programs

RI Office of Management and Budget Performance Report

Jail Diversion & Behavioral Health

Services Provided for Polk County Residents

Bexar County, Texas San Antonio

Contra Costa County: A Model for Managing Local Corrections

Jail Mental Health Services

One State One Solution: Policy Services & Research Data Center DIANE HAYNES FLORIDA MENTAL HEALTH INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA

WHAT IS THE ILLINOIS CENTER OF EXCELLENCE AND HOW DID IT START? MISSION STATEMENT

Opioid Treatment Programs at the Baltimore City Detention Center

ALAMEDA COUNTY SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER (SUD) SERVICES

How To Calculate The Cost Of A Jail Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program

Statistics on Women in the Justice System. January, 2014

Austin Travis County Integral Care Jail Diversion Programs and Strategies

Analysis One Code Desc. Transaction Amount. Fiscal Period

Dutchess County Special Populations Work Group Meeting

Mental Health & Addiction Forensics Treatment

Building A Reformed Criminal Justice System: The Sequential Intercept Model

Introduction & Guiding Principles p. 3. Guiding Principle 1: Acknowledge that gender makes a difference p. 3

ALTERNATIVES TO INCARCERATION IN A NUTSHELL

Working Paper # March 4, Prisoner Reentry and Rochester s Neighborhoods John Klofas

MENTALLY ILL OFFENDER TREATMENT AND CRIME REDUCTION REAUTHORIZATION AND IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 2008

Drug and Mental Health Court Support for the Criminal Offender

Hamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide

Community Supervision Texas Association of Counties October 2015

Fairfax-Falls Church Community Services Board

COMMUNITY SERVICES 238 HUMAN SERVICES. Mission Statement. Mandates. Expenditure Budget: $37,580, % of Human Services

CORRELATES AND COSTS

Department of Community and Human Services Mental Health, Chemical Abuse and Dependency Services Division

Stopping the Revolving Door for Mentally Ill Offenders in the Criminal Justice System via Diversion and Re-entry Programs

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL

OUR MISSION. WestCare s mission. is to empower everyone whom. we come into contact with. to engage in a process of healing, growth and change,

New Developments in Supported Employment San Francisco Behavioral Health Court

Issues Contributing to the Overcrowding in the Santa Cruz County Main Jail

BANNOCK COUNTY JUVENILE JUSTICE CLASSES AND PROGRAMS SUMMARY

FY1314 CCP Budget Matrix_rev4_ xlsx AB109 FY Cont Progs Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Variance Analysis

Leveraging National Health Reform to Reduce Recidivism & Build Recovery

AT&T Global Network Client for Windows Product Support Matrix January 29, 2015

Are juvenile halls fading away? Written by Erik Larsen Jan. 25, 2014

Placer County Criminal Justice Policy Committee Criminal Justice Master Planning Project Objectives and Recommendations FINAL - February 10, 2015

EDUCATIONBASEDINCARCERATION

Financing Systems: Leveraging Funds to Support a Comprehensive Program

SENTENCING REFORM FOR NONVIOLENT OFFENSES: BENEFITS AND ESTIMATED SAVINGS FOR ILLINOIS

Commission on Criminal Justice and Sentencing Reform. Wednesday, June 3 rd, :00pm to 5:00pm

Community Corrections and Mental Health Probation Supervision

Proposition 5. Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute.

External Advisory Group Meeting June 2, 2015

Treatment for Addiction in the Community Reduces Drug Use, Crime and Recidivism

Mental Illness, Addiction and the Whatcom County Jail

ATLANTIC JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DRUG COURT

Results from the Substance Abuse Programs in Jails Survey Conducted Fall 2013

THE SAN DIEGO. Reentry Roundtable. Recommendations to Assembly Select Committee on Justice Reinvestment

AB 109 is DANGEROUS. Governor Brown signed AB 109 the Criminal Justice Realignment Bill into law on April 5, 2011.

Marin County s STAR Program: Support and Treatment for Mentally Ill Offenders

How To Get A Drug Sentence In New York

Division of Criminal Justice Services Office of Justice Research and Performance Drug Law Reform Preliminary Update on Early Implementation

CALIFORNIA IN CONTEXT September

Hamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide

How To Fund A Mental Health Court

Alaska Department of Corrections Substance Abuse Treatment Services Status Report January, 2011

Florida County Detention Facilities Average Inmate Population January 2012

Florida County Detention Facilities Average Inmate Population February 2012

Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida Criminal Mental Health Project

It s time to shift gears on criminal justice VOTER

2012 Outcome Evaluation Report

Mental Health Courts: Solving Criminal Justice Problems or Perpetuating Criminal Justice Involvement?

Data Management Plan. County of Sonoma CCP Data Management and Evaluation Sub-committee

A SNAPSHOT OF JUVENILE FACILITIES IN ORANGE COUNTY

Case 2:08-cv ABC-E Document 1-4 Filed 04/15/2008 Page 1 of 138. Exhibit 8

Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Maricopa County

Steven P. Barnett, MD

IMPLICATIONS OF IMPLEMENTATION THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE

County of San Diego Public Safety Realignment & Post-Release Community Supervision. Preliminary 2011 Implementation Plan

DCF 2014 Inventory and Needs Assessment for New Jersey Behavioral Health

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) of Drug Abuse Treatment for Criminal Justice Populations

Mental Health Court 101

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT PROGRAMS AT THE CORRECTIONS CENTER OF NORTHWEST OHIO

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation California Health Care Facility (CHCF)

A Fiscal Analysis of Issue 1 The Ohio Drug Treatment Initiative

Reconfiguration Update

LEGISLATIVE ALERT. Via Electronic Mail

The Criminal Justice Conversations Podcast with David Onek. Episode #30: Wendy Still, San Francisco Chief Adult Probation Officer (March 21, 2012)

Orange County Public Safety Realignment and Postrelease Community Supervision:

Transcription:

June 09, 2015 1

Presenters Jim McDonnell, Sheriff, Los Angeles Sheriff s Dept. Dr. Mark Ghaly, Dept. of Health Services Dr. Marvin J. Southard, Dept. of Mental Health Dr. Wesley Ford, Dept. of Public Health Terri McDonald, Assistant Sheriff, Los Angeles Sheriff s Dept. Massood Eftekhari, Dept. of Public Works Bradford Bolger, Chief Executive Office 2

Jim McDonnell Sheriff Los Angles Sheriff s Department 3

Dr. Mark Ghaly Director of Community Health and Integrated Programs Department of Health Services 4

Dr. Marvin J. Southard Director Department of Mental Health Jail Mental Health Services 5

Vision for an Integrated Care System Jail as one component of a community care system that includes diversion to mental health and substance abuse treatment and community-based aftercare. Jail with sufficient treatment space designed to address the rehabilitation needs of individuals with mental health problems and co-occurring disorders. Expand space for those in an acute mental health crisis to address the level of actual need with flexibility as those needs change. Treatment space should facilitate integrated care for health, mental health, and substance abuse interventions. Enable community programs to provide in-reach services to establish therapeutic relationships with inmates prior to release. Encourage and enable family support. 6

Dr. Wesley Ford Director, Substance Abuse Prevention Control Department of Public Health Importance of Providing Substance Abuse Treatment 7

Vision for an Integrated Care System Historically, substance use disorders (SUDs) have not been addressed in the jail setting. For the first time, the integration of jail health services provides an opportunity to deliver these critical services. By providing integrated and coordinated treatment services during incarceration and linking them with necessary community-based services upon release, we maximize the opportunity to positively influence inmate health and life trajectory. An estimated 80% of inmates suffer from SUDs. ~ 60% of inmates have SUDs as a single condition. ~ 20% of inmates have co-occurring mental health and substance abuse issues. Given the high risk for recidivism in terms of both criminal behaviors and hospitalizations of substance abusing inmates, even limited intervention in this population can result in high impact gains for affected individuals, health care and criminal justice systems, and the community as a whole. Reduced recidivism, improved outcomes, and long-term cost savings 8

Terri McDonald Assistant Sheriff Los Angeles Sheriff s Department Population Overview 9

Population Overview ADIP Trend Jail Population/Not Including Alternative Custody Programs February 2011 - April 2015 20000 19500 19000 18500 18000 17500 17000 16500 19175 18236 17500 16748 18965 18708 18560 18679 18366 19027 19072 19121 19147 19037 18740 18636 18535 16301 Prop 47 17237 17169 Split Sentencing 16000 15500 15462 15312 15708 AB109 15766 15000 14500 14251 14000 13500 13911 Feb-11 Apr-11 Jun-11 Aug-11 Oct-11 Dec-11 Feb-12 Apr-12 Jun-12 Aug-12 Oct-12 Dec-12 Feb-13 Apr-13 Jun-13 Aug-13 Oct-13 Dec-13 Feb-14 Apr-14 Jun-14 Aug-14 Oct-14 Dec-14 Feb-15 Apr-15 10

Mental Health Population in the Jail 2012-May 2015 Mental Health Population 3700 3600 3500 3466 3504 3458 3566 3501 3507 3557 3400 3393 3404 3300 3200 3135 3100 3081 3000 2900 2800 2012 2013 2014 2015 JAN 2015 FEB 2015 MAR 2015 APR 2015 MAY Week 1 2015 MAY Week 2 2015 MAY Week 3 2015 5/26 11

Bed Capacity (excludes East and MCJ) Features TTCF CRDF PDC NORTH PDC SOUTH NCCF Total BSCC Rated Capacity 2,244 1,588 768 846 2,208 7,654 ^Population as of 05-12-15 3,558* 1,866 1,503 1,451 3,877 12,255** Over rated BSCC Capacity 1,314 278 735 605 1,669 4,601 Non-Traditional Beds*** 383 270 0 492 573 1,718 Overcrowding % 159% 118% 196% 172% 176% 160% ^Population depicted is from PMB Daily Inmate Statistics dated May 12, 2015 and does not include inmates in fire camps, alternative custody, station jails, etc. *TTCF count includes CTC and LCMC of 173 **The 4,278 Inmates at MCJ and East are not included in the total *** Non traditional beds include dayroom and triple bunks 12

Facility County of Los Angeles Consolidated Correctional Treatment Facilities Aging Infrastructure Year Built PDC East 1951 MCJ 1963 MCJ Expansion 1970 PDC South 1975 PDC North 1987 North County Correctional Facility 1990 Century Regional Detention Facility 1994 Twin Towers Correctional Facility 1997 13

Population Management Strategies Alternative Custody Program Inmate Population in Alternative Custody Programs Beds - May 12, 2015 Male Female Total Electronic Monitoring 220 61 281 Work Release 247 33 280 Work Release Weekenders 57 1 58 Treatment Services 5 28 33 Total 529 123 652 CDCR Fire Camp 132 19 151 Station Workers 127 0 127 Total 788 142 930 14

Program Update Program Sentenced GT/WT Conservation Fire Camp Milestone Program Credit Earnings Penal Code 4019 PC 4019.1 PC 4019.2 PC 4019.4 PC Credit Earned Day-for-Day (1:1) One and half-for One (1.5:1) Two-for-One (2:1) Up to 6 weeks per year Type of Inmate All Sentenced Inmates All Sentenced Inmates AB109 Sentenced Inmates AB109 Sentenced Inmates Program Bed Savings Program Inmates in Program ADIP Savings Conservation 1,967 323 Fire Camp 151 37 Milestone 1,300 64 Total 3,418 424 15

Program Update Average Sentence Percentage Release Average Length of Stay ADIP Savings TCS 90% 180 73 657 Shorts 48 14 910 Total ADIP Savings 1567 TCS Traditional County Sentence Shorts are inmates sentenced to less than 60 days Approximately 65 short inmates are processed each day The Department is working with researchers from the University of California Irvine to confirm these projections 16

Population Management Studies Rough Projected ADIP Savings for Mental Health Diversion FY 13/14 Screened 2197 Diverted 1014 ** 46% of those screened were approved Number of people diverted Percentage diverted Total by felony/misd Diverted Average Days Served if sentenced Total Bed Days Saved Felony/both 60% 608 112 68141 187 Misd 40% 406 104 42182 116 Total 1014 110323 302 Projection need to be to be validated by University of California Irvine project team Projections are based on average time to serve, without regard to actual crime Used Traditional County Sentence average, versus AB 109 average due to recent Prop 47 changes Additional information on eligible offenses for consideration for diversion would need to be applied to findings ADIP Savings 17

Vanir Option vs. Current Solution 18

Vanir 1B Concept vs Potential Solution Correctional Treatment Facility Vanir 1B Configuration Proposed Flexible Housing Potential Comments Inpatient Crisis Beds 60 Single Cells Inpatient Crisis/Suicide Observation 60 Licensed Beds Unlicensed High Acuity 200 Single Cells High Acuity/Detox/Suicide Precaution 180 Licensable High Observation Beds 600 Single Cells 200 Double Cells Treatment Unit - Celled Configuration 864 MH, Co-occuring, SAP, EBI, Women's, Vets, Detox, ETC Outpatient Step Down Beds 2200 Small Dorms Treatment Unit - Dorm Configuration 2112 MH, Co-occuring, SAP, EBI, Women's, Vets, Detox, ETC Substance Abuse 500 Midsize Dorms Medical Outpatient Housing 500 Cells and Dorms Medical Outpatient/Detox 512 Clinically necessary for support/observation but not licensed High Security Cells 400 Single Cells High Security - Single Cells 200 Requires locking mechanism 200 Double Cells conversion at TTCF SubTotal* 4860 3928-932 Reopen Mira Loma 1156 Dorms Add Women s Transitional Housing Unit 1604 448 Close Men's Central Jail -5108 Close Men's Central Jail -5108 Activate East 1152 Dorms Decommission PDC-East 0-1152 Total Additional Capacity 2048 428-1614 System Crowding above 124.50% 118% BSCC *Assumes a reduction in population of 845 through alternative custody, diversion, credit earning, recidivism reduction Does not address lack of capacity to accept or retain Traditional County Sentenced inmates - could add 1,500-1,600 inmates Does not assume any natural reduction or increase in population due to sentencing changes, demographic changes, etc. 19

Potential Adjustment to Vanir 1B Current Status - Population as of 5/2/15* Twin Towers CRDF NCCF PDC-N PDC-S East MCJ Total BSCC 2244 1588 2208 768 846 926 5108 13688 5/12/15 Pop 3558 1866 3877 1503 1451 N/A 4190 16445 Over BSCC 1314 278 1669 735 605 N/A -918 3683 Percentage over BSCC 159% 118% 176% 196% 172% N/A 82% 120% *Overcrowding Excludes East - BSCC capacity, current population less than 100 True Overcrowding Excluding East and MCJ is 160% Potential Change to Vanir 1B Twin Towers CRDF NCCF PDC-N PDC-S MLDC CCTF BSCC 2244 1588 2208 768 846 1604 3928 13186 Proposed 3100 2000 3000 1050 1150 1500 3800 15600 Over BSCC 856 412 792 282 304-104 -128 2414 Percentage over BSCC 138% 126% 136% 137% 136% 94% 97% 118% Difference in Total Pop -458 134-877 -453-301 N/A N/A N/A Difference in Crowding -20% 8% -40% -59% -36% N/A N/A N/A **Comments Potential Change assumes reduction of inmates by 845 inmates and does not account for 1570 early release ADIP impacts. This 2,400+ gap should be addressed by Diversion, Alternative Custody, Recidivism Reduction, Credit earning, etc. Does not assume any growth in inmate population. Population projections trends are not generally considered accurate for more than 1 year and considered inaccurate more than 5 years Assumes no court intervention on crowding levels above the BSCC rated capacity Recommend 20 year jail plan Recommend hardening TTCF cells from medium security locks to high security locks. 20

Massood Eftekhari Deputy Director Dept. of Public Works Project Status 21

Existing Site and Development Option Existing Site Development Option 22

Phasing Diagram (A) Demolition A Demolition ❶ 2-Story Parking Structure (Partial Demolition) ❶ 23

Phasing Diagram (B) Build & Occupy B Build & Occupy ❶ 10-Story Parking Structure ❶ 24

Phasing Diagram (C) Demolition C Demolition ❷ ❶ MCJ 1970 s Building ❷ Court Line & Bus Yard ❸ 4-Story Parking Structure & Bus Maintenance Facility ❶ ❸ 25

Phasing Diagram (D) Build & Occupy D Build & Occupy ❷ ❶ ❶ Housing Towers ❷ Correctional Treatment Center (CTC) ❸ Medical Clinic & Support Services (at Ground & Basement Levels) ❹ Central Plant ❸ ❹ 26

Phasing Diagram (E) Demolition E Demolition ❷ ❶ MCJ 1960 s Building ❷ Infirmary & Central Plant ❸ Pedestrian Bridge ❶ ❸ 27

Phasing Diagram (F) Build & Occupy F Build & Occupy ❶ Administration Building ❷ Court Line and Bus Parking ❸ Pedestrian Bridge ❷ ❶ ❸ 28

New Correctional Treatment Facilities Program Cost CCTF Cost - $1.8B to $2.0B Efficiencies achieved Mission focus Health Care & Substance Abuse Pitchess East for swing space Mira Loma Cost - $123M Offset by $100M State grant 29

New Correctional Treatment Facilities Program Schedule CCTF Schedule Award Design-Build contract Q3 2016 Start Construction Q1 2017 Bed Tower occupancy Q3 2021 Construction Completion Q2 2024 Mira Loma Schedule Award Design-Build contract Q3 2016 Start Construction Q3 2017 Construction completion Q4 2019 Occupancy Q1 2020 30

Bradford Bolger Chief Executive Office Funding and Financing 31

New Correctional Treatment Facilities Mira Loma Project Funding State Grant: $100.0M* NCC: $ 20.0M CJFTC Revenue: $ 3.4M Total Project Cost: $123.4M *Project Establishment for AB 900 State Grant required by Sept. 2015 32

New Correctional Treatment Facilities CCTF Funding & Financing Total Project Cost Estimate: $1.8 to $2.0B Project funding $100M NCC already committed Commercial Paper/Long Term Bond proceeds $1.8B Financing 30-year annual debt service: $135M Seeking State AB 1468 assistance: $ 15M Estimated net annual debt service: $120M Long term bond repayments start 2021-22 Commit expiring Sheriff Debt Service for CCTF costs ($23M) Set aside add l ongoing $17M/yr for 6 yrs, starting in 2016-17 33

Discussion 34