Appendix D Flood Damage Assessment



Similar documents

Emergency Streambank Restoration/Stabilization. Kentucky Division of Water Water Quality Certification May 2010 Educational Assistance

Georgia Emergency Operations Plan. Emergency Support Function # 5 Annex Emergency Management

A Comprehensive Summary

ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF FUNDING FOR

Post-Flood Assessment

WEST VIRGINIA SCHOOLS Updating the Geographic Names Information System

Why does Kittitas County want to form a Flood Control Zone District?

DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

Appendix J Online Questionnaire

Iowa Smart Planning. Legislative Guide March 2011

A. Flood Management in Nevada

Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs. Disaster Recovery and Mitigation Planning Ft. Worth, Texas February 15, 2012

North Dakota GIS Program Report To Governor Jack Dalrymple. July 1, 2011 June 30, 2012

MERI Library Research Guide 2: Information on Flooding - Preparation, Prevention and Recovery

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE What can I do with this degree?

North Branch Chicago River Watershed-Based Plan

Stream Restoration Account of Flood and Drought Response Fund Grant Program Guidance May 2014

Range Management Databases on the Web: Two Examples

DAMAGE ASSESSMENT ANNEX E

Homeland Security Infrastructure Program HSIP Gold 2012 September 2012

Long-Term Community Recovery & Mitigation

How To Help A Terrorist Attack

Program Details Notes Flood Mitigation Assistance Program (FMA)

ESF 14. Long-Term Community Recovery

APPENDIX B. Delaware County Partners Action Plan

DELAWARE COUNTY STREAM CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TWO-YEAR ACTION PLAN FOR THE WEST BRANCH DELAWARE RIVER CANNONSVILLE RESERVOIR BASIN

Appendix B REFERENCES

Community RiskMAP Questionnaire

The following was presented at DMT 14 (June 1-4, 2014, Newark, DE).

This paper provides a concise description of

Flood Insurance Repetitive Loss Property

Alluvial Fan Mapping and Risk Assessment

The purpose of ESF #9 is to identify search, rescue, and recovery roles and responsibilities within the City of Tucson during a disaster.

Benefits of USDA Programs

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

Disaster Recovery in Stages

Eco-Logical Approach to Infrastructure Development Initiative. May 12 & 14, 2010 Eco-Logical Initiative Technical Meeting

NAPA COUNTY WATERSHED SYMPOSIUM

COMMUNITY CERTIFICATIONS

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project

Mapping Application for Resource Planning

DISTRICT VALUES STATEMENTS, GOALS, ACTION ITEMS, AND ONGOING TASKS FOR 2015 Adopted by the Board of Directors December 10, Values Statements.

FEMA Updates Flood Plain Information For 2006

Guidelines for Assessing and Documenting Disaster Damage. Part 1: Immediately After the Event

ESF 01 - Transportation Annex, 2015

Emergency Support Function #8 Public Health and Medical Services

Emergency Quick Reference Guide

Challenges. Estimated Damages from 100-Year Flood

B E F O R E T H E E M E R G E N C Y

Case Study: The History of the San Juan Headwaters Forest Health Partnership

Local hazard mitigation plans Disaster recovery plans Flood preparedness activities/public education Mitigation projects (construction) Post-disaster

The West Virginia Stream and Wetland Valuation Metric

THE CAGIS CONSORTIUM DATA SERVICES PRICING POLICY

ROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND

Animals in Disasters

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

Available FSA and NRCS Disaster Assistance Programs Crop Insurance: Prevented Planting and Failed Acreage Considerations Click on title for video

Wildfire & Flash Flood Recovery Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP) Flood Mitigation Efforts April Fall 2013

How To Manage Water Resources In The Yakima Basin

Emergency Support Function #14 Long Term Community Recovery and Mitigation

Wildfire & Flash Flood Recovery NACo Justice & Public Safety Symposium January 2014

Public Law and Non-Structural Alternatives to Levee Repairs

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Between THE CITY OF BALTIMORE And THE MID-ATLANTIC FEDERAL PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ENVIRONMENT

The answers to some of the following questions are separated into two major categories:

Lower Crooked Creek Watershed Conservation Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Maryland Emergency Operations Plan

Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General Disaster Financial Assistance Q&A

Emergency Management

Appendix B REFERENCES

What Does OSU Extension Do For Clermont County

Post-Sandy Municipal Needs Assessment for Long-Term Recovery and Resiliency Planning EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Jacksonville Port Authority: Fire and Rescue Marine Fire Station #40, Jacksonville, Florida

Utah State General Records Retention Schedule SCHEDULE 1 GEOSPATIAL DATA SETS

9.8 APPENDIX H Proclamations/Declarations-Frequently Asked Questions

CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA

Chesapeake Conservation Corps Host Organization Cover Sheet

October 4, 2012 Annual Meeting

Status of State PACE Programs

Vermont Disaster Relief Fund

Enterprise GIS Business Plan July 4, 2008

SCOPE... p. 2. DATA STAKEHOLDERS... p. 2. APPLICATION... p. 3. OPERATIONAL CAPACITY.. p. 4. Figure 1: SLDS Data Lifecycle... p. 4

Section 19. Basin-wide Mitigation Action Plans

Colorado Natural Heritage Program

Instructions and Helpful Hints. for Preparation of. Emergency Action Plans

Greater Eatonville Chamber of Commerce Strategic Plan

Preparedness in the Southwest

Page Intentionally Left Blank

County Watersheds. Total Project Cost - $11.1 M. Project Description. Funding Sources. Project Milestones. Service Impact

Urban Stream Restoration Defining the Full Benefits of a Project. Warren C. High MACTEC Engineering and Consulting

ST. CROIX COUNTY LAND INFORMATION INTERNET ACCESS POLICY REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ANNEX P HAZARD MITIGATION

FINAL Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) for the Chesapeake Bay TMDL July 2, 2012

Remaining Wetland Acreage 1,500, , ,040-39%

Burnt River Black River and Gull River Flood Contingency Plan

Disaster Risk Assessment:

LAW ENFORCEMENT. B. In the event of major disaster, outside resources may not be available to provide support.

Emergency Operations Plan ANNEX K - UTILITIES RESTORATION ESF #3, #12 I. MNWALK REQUIREMENTS. Item #: 1, 4, 46, 53, 54

Transcription:

Appendix D Flood Damage Assessment There is no single definition of the phrase flood-damage assessment that is applicable to all agencies. Such a definition would be difficult to develop and may be unnecessary. Every agency collects damage data that is specific to their mission. Some agencies collect data to aid in determining the scope, severity, and size of the flood as it impacts business and residential structures. Other agencies collect data on specific types of structures (agricultural, highways,etc.). Still other agencies collect data on the flooding impacts on the stream banks. Figures D-1, D-2, and D-3 show the types of damages for which data is collected by various agencies. Figure D-1. Flood Damaged Vehicle 191

Figure D-2. Residential Flood Damages Figure D-3. Damaged Stream Banks 192

Anyone attempting to locate specific information on historical floods, potential flooding, and flood damage will soon discover that agencies typically organize their data using criteria and software that differ from those of other agencies, making no attempt to relate their data to any other data. This makes it difficult for agencies to access one another s information concerning flood damage assessments, and therefore difficult to analyze the impacts of the flooding and the performance of the agencies involved. Table D-1 shows the agencies, organizations, associations, and individuals that collect data relating to flood damage for their own mission specific purposes in West Virginia. Table D-1 Agencies, Organizations and Associations Collecting Flood Damage Data American Red Cross County and Municipal Governments Federal Emergency Management Agency Insurance Agents Public Utilities Volunteer Organizations Active in Disaster Regional Planning and Development Offices Small Business Administration US Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District US Army Corps of Engineers Huntington District US Army Corps of Engineers Pittsburgh District USD A Farm Service Agency USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service WV Bureau for Public Health WV Department of Agriculture WV Department of Education WV Department of Environmental Protection WV Department of Health and Human Resources WV Department of Transportation WV Development Office WV Division of Corrections WV Division of Forestry WV Division of Natural Resources WV Housing Development Fund WV National Guard WV Office of Emergency Services WV Conservation Agency WV State Fire Marshal s Office WV University Extension Service 193

No effort is ongoing to compile a definitive database of flood damage or flood protection information for all organizations in West Virginia. Furthermore, no one agency is responsible for keeping all flood damage data current. Therefore, no historical flooddamage data is compiled and available for predicting potential damage, nor can flood damage data from different flood events be compared with any confidence. To facilitate developing comparable data for future floods, the Task Force recommends establishment of a single point of contact or clearinghouse and repository of historic data. This should be one agency, mandated to collect all flood related data including an inventory of at-risk structures, repetitive loss data, flood control project data, and other databases. This data should include information on losses sustained by residences, businesses, farms/ agricultural losses, roadways, railroads and other types of losses. The WV Office of Emergency Services would be the logical place for such a database providing WVOES is adequately staffed with two database managers and funding to support their activities. Two systems are used to organize flood damage and flood frequency data in West Virginia: by county and by watershed. The Corps of Engineers and the Natural Resource Conservation Service usually study flood damages on a watershed basis. Numerous watersheds in the state span several counties (see Figure 1-5), therefore flooding usually impacts more than one county at a time. When planning for flood control or flood mitigation projects, it is imperative that the entire watershed be examined to determine the effects of any project or event on flooding from the headwaters to the mouth of the watershed. Other forms of flood damage assessments are done on a county-by-county basis since that is how Federal assistance is generally provided. The Federal Emergency Management Agency, West Virginia Office of Emergency Services, American Red Cross, and the Small Business Administration typically collect flood damage information on a county-by-county basis. County governments are also the most likely local sponsors for small-scale flood control projects. Few watershed associations have the capacity either in financial resources or in management structure to administer flood control or planning projects. To ensure that flood information is available for watersheds and for counties, the Task Force recommends that all data including data on repetitive loss structures, be compiled with latitude, longitude, and elevation reference data. In this manner, the data can be extracted from the databases to generate Geographic Information System mapping layers for county or watershed flood protection planning. The Natural Resource Conservation Service has developed a database of land use and damage assessment for most of the 11-digit HUC code watersheds in West Virginia.. These tables should be examined by NRCS and updated on a regular basis. The Corps of Engineers should develop similar figures for the watersheds along major rivers not covered by the NRCS. 194

Information on repetitive loss structures is available. However, it is impossible to locate these structures with an acceptable degree of precision. Privacy issues may prevent the information being made available to the public, but it should be available to local, State and Federal agencies involved in floodplain management, flood protection planning, and project planning. All local jurisdictions should obtain the repetitive loss data from WV OES and develop 11-digit HUC codes or latitude, longitude, and elevation figures for each repetitive loss structure in their jurisdiction. This data can then be included in a GIS database for use by local, State and Federal agencies. Many local officials, State and Federal agencies, and the public are uncertain about whom to contact for information or assistance relating to flooding. With the constant evolution of programs, it is impossible for all agencies to stay abreast of developments in the other agencies involved in flood preparation, response, recovery, and mitigation. It s imperative that the Statewide Flood Protection Plan Task Force take steps to alleviate this by developing a chart that identifies who to contact for information or assistance on the issues related to flooding. This chart should be available in a printed version and in a web-based version for distribution to the public. It was discovered that information on the mortality from flooding at different recurrence levels has never been examined in West Virginia or comparable areas. Nor is there a portable morgue in West Virginia for use in the event of a major disaster involving loss of life. Current plans provide for borrowing a portable morgue from Pennsylvania. The Task Force recommends that the West Virginia State Medical Examiner s Office be provided the necessary funds to purchase, equip and staff a portable morgue for use in mass casualty disasters and conduct a study of the expected mortality from flooding at different recurrence levels. 195