Sagebrush steppe post-fire rehabilitation projects: Using the past to guide the future



Similar documents
Big Sagebrush Community Restoration in Utah: Lessons Learned. Danny Summers and Jason Vernon Utah Division of Wildlife Resources

THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR WASHINGTON

Range plants respond with vigor following post-fire rehabilitation efforts by the BLM, Forest Service

Angora Fire Restoration Activities June 24, Presented by: Judy Clot Forest Health Enhancement Program

Appendix C. Re-vegetation and Rehabilitation Sub-Plan

Restoring Burned Area Fire Regimes at Zion National Park

STATEMENT OF RON HUNTSINGER NATIONAL SCIENCE COORDINATOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT U.S

FORESTED VEGETATION. forests by restoring forests at lower. Prevent invasive plants from establishing after disturbances

An Integrated Rangeland Fire Management Strategy

Evaluating the Effects and Effectiveness of Post-fire Seeding Treatments in Western Forests

GENERAL WATERING & CARE GUIDE

Post-Wildfire Clean-Up and Response in Houston Toad Habitat Best Management Practices

Nevada Pinyon-Juniper Partnership Proposed Demonstration Area A Brief Introduction. Presented by Jeremy Drew Project Manager Resource Concepts, Inc.

NPS Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER) and Burned Area Rehabilitation (BAR) in the Southern California Landscape

by Erik Lehnhoff, Walt Woolbaugh, and Lisa Rew

FOREST RESTORATION MONITORING TOOL

Increasing water availability through juniper control.

Colorado Natural Heritage Program

Prepared By: Tom Parker Geum Environmental Consulting, Inc.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT ELKO FIELD OFFICE

Ecologically based weed management! Chuck Mohler! Cornell University!

STANDARDS FOR RANGELAND HEALTH ASSESSMENT FOR SAGEHEN ALLOTMENT #0208

King Fire Restoration Project, Eldorado National Forest, Placer and El Dorado Counties, Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

4.0 Discuss some effects of disturbances on the forest.

Implementation Plan. Secretarial Order 3336 Rangeland Fire Prevention, Management, and Restoration

Appendix C. Municipal Planning and Site Restoration Considerations

How To Plan A Buffer Zone

18 voting members 44 stakeholders 114 list. Senators: Wyden & Merkley Representative DeFazio

How To Know If A Forest Service And Bmd Plan Postfire Rehabilitation And Restoration

MONITORING TOOLS AND METHODS. Michelle Buzalsky Rangeland Management Technician Shoshone National Forest

GRAZING AND FIRE MANAGEMENT FOR NATIVE PERENNIAL GRASS RESTORATION IN CALIFORNIA GRASSLANDS

Page Intentionally Blank

Monitoring Hydrological Changes Related to Western Juniper Removal: A Paired Watershed Approach

Designing in Sustainability in an Utility Scale Photovoltaic Array. Tim Green, Brookhaven National Laboratory Richard Chandler, BP Solar October 2010

REPORT TO REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY COMMISSION MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2013 LEECH WATER SUPPLY AREA RESTORATION UPDATE

3.1. Succession, Recovery, and Renewal in Natural Communities. A35 Starting Point. What Happens to a Vacant Lot?

Forest Watershed Tree Thinning Restoration Effectiveness Monitoring in the Manzano Mountains of New Mexico

Chapter 11 Site Rehabilitation and Stabilization

Communities, Biomes, and Ecosystems

Effects of Climate Change on Grasslands. Jeff Thorpe Saskatchewan Research Council June 27, 2012

Recovery and Rehabilitation of Vegetation on the Fitzner-Eberhardt Arid Lands Ecology Reserve, Hanford Reach National Monument, Following the 24

Summer Stress Arrives Early on Cool Season Lawns

Tree and forest restoration following wildfire

Woodlands Management Plan. (Draft June 2011) A. Definition of Woodlands Areas vs. Landscaped Areas of Parkfairfax

CRP Mid-Contract Management Option: Integrated Wildlife Management (645)

Interagency Burned Area Emergency Response Guidebook Interpretation of Department of the Interior 620 DM 3 and USDA Forest Service Manual 2523

Integrated Weed Management in Portland Parks

Population Ecology. Life History Traits as Evolutionary Adaptations

Will climate changedisturbance. interactions perturb northern Rocky Mountain ecosystems past the point of no return?

The Bureau of Land Management s native plant restoration in arid regions of the United States

Soil and Vegetation Management: Keys to Water Conservation on Rangeland

Fire Management needs assessment and priority actions

I m Randy Swaty, ecologist on The Nature Conservancy s LANDFIRE team. In the next half hour, I ll introduce LANDFIRE to you, talk about how we

Direct sowing versus planting

runing & Orchard Renewal

weather information management system / remote automated weather station

Restoring Conservancy Lands Following the Angora Fire a Preliminary Assessment

Fighting Fire with Fire: Can Fire Positively Impact an Ecosystem?

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

MONITORING RANGELANDS

Disturbances & Succession in a Restoration Context

Note on Draft Progress Report Template

Final Report. Dixie Creek Restoration Project. Funded by Plumas Watershed Forum

The importance of ESD concept for rangeland monitoring program and rangeland management in Mongolia

Your Defensible Space Slideshow

Past and Current Research on Natural Resource Issues in the Blue Mountains

Maintaining a Healthy Lawn

Fertilizer, Weed Control, Grubs, and General Application Questions

Restoring Land and Planting Trees

6. NATURAL AREAS FIRE MANAGEMENT

PRESCRIBED GRAZING NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD. (Acre) Code 528

Monitoring Post-Fire Vegetation Rehabilitation Projects: A Common Approach for Non-Forested Ecosystems

Milk Thistle BACKGROUND INFORMATION. King County Noxious Weed Control Program BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. Impacts and History.

REVIEW UNIT 10: ECOLOGY SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Summary of Pre- and Post-Project Vegetation Survey Results

Evergreen Carbon Capture - 2

PUTTING FORAGES TOGETHER FOR YEAR ROUND GRAZING

Chapter 3 Communities, Biomes, and Ecosystems

A. Economic Analysis

Transcription:

Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center Sagebrush steppe post-fire rehabilitation projects: Using the past to guide the future David A. Pyke, U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey 1

Emergency Stabilization & Rehabilitation (ES&R) AKA: Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER) Objectives Reduce Soil Erosion Prevent Invasive Spread Rehab Critical Habitat How? Revegetation Seed Drills Timeframe Aerial/Broadcast Transplants Plans due 2-3 wks after fire Complete in 1-3 yrs Milford Flat Fire, UT 2

Are Seedings Effective in Erosion Control? Short-term (1-2 years) Ineffective seeded plants can t establish fast enough (Robichaud et al. 2000; 2010; Pyke et al 2013) Wind Erosion Consider allowing annual plants to establish to hold soil. (M. Miller et al 2012) Slopes Water Erosion Mulch, drift fences, physical obstructions (waddles) Long-term (3+ years) Revegetation more effective at higher elevations (Knutson et al 2014) 3

Water Erosion Control Alternatives to Seeding Water Erosion Reduction on hillslopes (Robichaud et al. 2010) Straw Mulch Effective at low to high rain intensity and amount Disadvantage Weed-free grass straw can still have cheatgrass use rice straw Wind redistribution use tackifier (e.g. guar, psyllium) Wood Mulch Effectiveness like straw Longer lasting Doesn t blow around Disadvantage Greater Cost 4

Wind Erosion Control Alternatives to Seeding Wind Erosion Reduction (Robichaud et al. 2010) Straw Mulch with tackifier Organic vs. Poly Acrylamide (PAM) PAM can reduce infiltration in some soils Wood Mulch Could be a use of Pinyon/Juniper Disadvantage Greater Cost 5

Fire and Cheatgrass (without seeding) Short-term (1-2 years) Control Warm Fire Cold Mechanical from Miller et al. 2013 Fire itself reduces annual grass cover (Miller R. et al 2013) Confirmed in SageSTEP results Long-term (3+ years) Cover of perennial grasses > annual grasses or deeprooted perennials > 2-3 plants/m 2 Perennials should dominate If not, depends on Resilience of site (Soil Temp/Moisture) Warm-dry sites cheatgrass likely will dominate 6

How to Interpret ES&R Findings? Seeded vs Unseeded If effective: Only light shading over one line Effectiveness not likely Dark shading over both lines Cover Of Perennials Effective? Seeded No Yes Unseeded Ineffective Cover Of Perennials Elevation or Precipitation 7

Invasive Annual Grasses mainly cheatgrass 100 Aerial Ineffective 100 Drill Effective above 4600 ft elevation 0% Cover Seeded 0% Cover Seeded 8 Precipitation (in) 16 3300 Elevation (ft) 6600 Drill seeding controls cheatgrass above 4600 ft Knutson et al 2014 J. Appl. Ecol. 8

Total Perennial Plant Cover 100 Aerial Ineffective 100 Drill Effective above 11 inches 0% Cover 0% Cover Seeded 3300 Elevation (ft) 6600 8 Precipitation (in) 16 Drill is effective above 11 inches of annual precipitation Due to seeded non-native perennial grasses Knutson et al 2014 J. Appl. Ecol. 9

Native Perennial Grasses Only No Non-native Forage Grasses or Shrubs Native drill-seeded grass cover was twice that of unseeded Forage grasses potentially outcompete natives Consider seeding natives without forage grasses Drill Seeded Unseeded Knutson et al 2014 J. Appl. Ecol. 10

Sagebrush Aerial or Aerial Drill or Drill cover density density Seeded Unseeded Seeded Unseeded Seeded Unseeded Seeding sagebrush was ineffective Alternative techniques needed Transplants, surface seeded with compaction New Project - SageSuccess 11

Sagebrush Transplant Survival & Average Cost per Surviving Plant Survival to 3 years old (%) $1.64/plant $2.66/plant $4.76/plant Planting Type Dettweiler-Robinson et al. 2013 REM 12

Mimic Patchy Fires with Surviving Sagebrush Transplants - 40 plants/ac yields 10 living plants/ac Yield in 3 years Grid - 1 surviving plant every 60 ft $17/ ac Aerial seedings of sagebrush $21/ac (seed + trtmnt) n=13, failure rate is high BLM ES&R reports Cost vs. Benefit? 13

Improving Seeding Success Provisional Seed Zones Purchase seeds from zone to be planted Requires site identification of seeds From Bowers et al. 2014 Ecol. Appl. 14

SAGE-GROUSE HABITAT MATRIX Proportion of Landscape Dominated by Sagebrush Low Medium High Resilience to Disturbance & Resistance to Invasive Annual Grasses High Mtn Big Sage - Mtn Brush Moderate Low Wyoming Big Sage < 25% Sagebrush- Dominated Landscape Natural sagebrush recovery possible. Sagebrush restoration potential is high Natural sagebrush recovery or restoration not likely 25-65% Sagebrush- Dominated Landscape Natural sagebrush recovery possible. Sagebrush restoration potential is high, but only in large patches. Perennial herbaceous sufficient to recover Annual invasive risk is low Restoration potential high Recovery from inappropriate grazing high Natural sagebrush recovery or restoration not likely > 65% Sagebrush- Dominated Landscape Sagebrush sufficient & natural recovery from disturbances likely. Natural sagebrush recovery possible, but rare due to climate Perennial herbaceous inadequate to recover Annual invasive risk is high Restoration potential low; needs multiple interventions Recovery from inappropriate grazing is low From Chambers et al. 2014 USFS GTR-326 15

If First You Don t Succeed Reseed until successful Arid ecosystems natural establishment is sporadic Seed Production Seedling germination Seedling establishment Weather dependent Only Seed Production is controlled by purchasing seed. 16

Post-fire Grazing Management No Seeding Why post-fire rest? Cover for erosion protection Recover tillers Seeds for new recruits Fires create voids (deaths) Need seeds for seedlings Considerations: Healthy stand of deep-rooted perennial grasses (>3plants/m 2 ) 2 growing season minimum; more if < 3/m 2 Allow maximum reproduction and regrowth; Dormant or Winter season only Miller et al 2013 USFS GTR 17

Post-fire Grazing Management With Seeding Seedlings vulnerable to trampling and defoliation Need to establish roots and shoots Must compete with annual grasses Rest period with site resilience, species, special conditions 18

Grazing Impacts on Grasses Pre-boot to boot Active growth Graze apical bud? (Boot stage) Stimulates axial bud growth Next years plant has fewer tillers & culms; slowly decreases in size May impact production & seeds Briske & Richards 1995 Inflorescence & Apical bud Culm / Stem Tiller / Axial Bud Roots 19

Minimum Years nongrazing (Stevens, R Chap 16 in Monsen et al 2004) 20

Add Years To Establish Gear to Maximum Species (Stevens, R Chap 16 in Monsen et al 2004) 21

Special Conditions = Additional Years Typical Wy. Sage Seeding Example Arid site = 4 years Big sagebrush = 4 years Site with cheatgrass = 3 years Total years growing season nonuse = 11! Standard growing season nonuse = 2 years Should be rare Exception Cool-moist site sown with only introduced forage grasses or forage kochia (Stevens, R Chap 16 in Monsen et al 2004) 22

Considerations Short-term stabilization Use mulches Arid ecosystems will require multiple interventions If seeding is necessary, repeat until establishment ES&R policy timeline is too restrictive for arid ecosystems Aerial seeding rarely successful except on resilient sites with introduced forage grasses Mixing introduced forage grasses with natives should be avoided. Post-fire grazing management after seedings needs to follow recommendations 23