Barnardo s NI Response to the. Draft Programme for Government Framework

Similar documents
Below you will find information relevant to CCPS members which has been taken from the Single Outcome Agreement published in June 2009.

Child Poverty in Scotland

2006 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF SERVICES FOR CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE IN THE EAST RIDING OF YORKSHIRE COUNCIL

2006 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF SERVICES FOR CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE IN ESSEX COUNTY COUNCIL

SAFEGUARDING CHILDREN AND CHILD PROTECTION POLICY

USER VOICE. Why We Exist

School Focused Youth Service Supporting the engagement and re-engagement of at risk young people in learning. Guidelines

Conwy Children and Young People s Plan Priority Areas

DESIGNING OUTCOMES METRICS FOR AN OUTCOMES-BASED CONTRACT

Simon Community Northern Ireland welcomes the opportunity to respond to the Alcohol and Drug Commissioning Framework for Northern Ireland

Inquiry into teenage pregnancy. Lanarkshire Sexual Health Strategy Group

Scotland s National Action Plan to tackle Child Sexual Exploitation

In its Explanatory Memorandum to the Committee, the Department for Work and Pensions states that:

Services for children and young people in North Ayrshire 28 October Report of a pilot joint inspection

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF SURREY COUNTY COUNCIL S EDUCATION AND CHILDREN S SOCIAL CARE SERVICES 2005

YOUTH WORK AND CRIME PREVENTION (Policy Guidelines)

Appeal to the Member States of the United Nations Early Childhood Development: The Foundation of Sustainable Human Development for 2015 and Beyond

Financial capability and saving: Evidence from the British Household Panel Survey

The Partnership Development Initiative. Researching the voluntary sector in criminal justice. Lessons and Insights

Scottish Families Affected by Alcohol and Drugs

A GENDER EDIT of A STRONGER SCOTLAND: THE GOVERNMENT S PROGRAMME FOR SCOTLAND

AMEY FMP and Belfast Education & Library Board

Family Group Conferences in child protection

Programme for Cohesion, Sharing and Integration: A Summary Document and Aid to Dialogue

The cost-effectiveness of Action for Children s Intensive Family Support services

This is Barnardos Children s Budget 2007

2006 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF SERVICES FOR CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE IN BARKING AND DAGENHAM COUNCIL

1. How would you define vulnerability in terms of a young person (under 24 who is in NOMS custody?

Working together to safeguard children. A guide to inter-agency working to safeguard and promote the welfare of children

Milton Keynes Drug and Alcohol Strategy

Who can benefit from charities?

6.6 Addictions and Substance Misuse

Working with Young People to Build Communities

Understanding sport and physical activity as a therapy choice for young disabled people. Views and opinions of paediatric physiotherapists

Services to Young Offenders

Guideline scope Workplace health: support for employees with disabilities and long-term conditions

Financial support for 16 to 19 year olds in education or training

Key Points. SNAPSHOT The impact of domestic violence on children. Domestic violence and children

DERBY CITY COUNCIL S EQUALITY AND DIVERSITY POLICY

National Standards for Disability Services. DSS Version 0.1. December 2013

Executive Member for Community Health and Wellbeing. Commissioned Alcohol Services and Current Performance Update

Prison Reform Trust consultation submission. More effective responses to anti-social behaviour

Photography and video film consent form

INTEGRATED OFFENDER MANAGEMENT KEY PRINCIPLES

Child Protection. UNICEF/Julie Pudlowski. for children unite for children

Thank you for your interest in the above position. Please find enclosed the following:

The Code. for Crown Prosecutors

COUNCIL OF EUROPE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS

DO CHILDREN AND PRISON GO TOGETHER? Cheryl Clay Adelaide Women s Prison and Ann Burfitt Department for Correctional Services, SA

Women, Punishment and Human Rights

Stoke-on-Trent Children and Young People s Plan

Citizenship education in Northern Ireland, Wales, Scotland and England

Policy Perspective Treatment and Recovery for Individuals and Families Experiencing Addiction January 11, 2016

Education Department Policy

Suite Overview...2. Glossary...8. Functional Map.11. List of Standards..15. Youth Work Standards 16. Signposting to other Standards...

QUALIFICATION REFORM: A GUIDE TO WHAT IS HAPPENING AROUND THE UK

Leeds Drug and Alcohol Strategy and Action Plan ( )

STATEMENT OF STRATEGY AN ROINN OIDEACHAIS AGUS SCILEANNA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND SKILLS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND SKILLS

Information for victims of crime

Office of the Children s Commissioner (OCC):

The National Occupational Standards. Social Work. Topss UK Partnership

Joint Response to The Programme for Cohesion, Sharing and Integration Consultation Document

Understanding the UK education system

Neglect Strategy

Criminal justice policy and the voluntary sector

Family Intervention Projects/Vulnerable Household Services

Securing Community Safety

STATES OF JERSEY. DRAFT CRIMINAL JUSTICE (YOUNG OFFENDERS) (No. 2) (JERSEY) LAW 201-

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF NORTH YORKSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL S EDUCATION AND CHILDREN S SOCIAL CARE SERVICES 2005

THE BLACKPOOL CHALLENGE

Rehabilitation programs for young offenders: Towards good practice? Andrew Day. Forensic Psychology Research Group. University of South Australia

Getting funding and planning successful projects. Big Lottery Fund guide to outcomes

Legislation and Child Labour Policy in Malawi Paper for the National Conference in Eliminating Child labour in Agriculture

Management Information. Chief Social Work Officer

Breaking the Cycle: Effective Punishment, Rehabilitation and Sentencing of Offenders. Response by the Children s Legal Centre

Crime & Homelessness

IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK

Response to Department of Education Review of Public Administration Policy Paper 20: Publicly owned schools ownership and representation.

Safeguarding Children and Child Protection

Draft Special Educational Needs (SEN) Code of Practice: for 0 to 25 years

What s Going On to safeguard children and young people from sexual exploitation? : A data monitoring Tool

Lesotho new Integrated Curriculum for primary schools in Lesotho

BRIEFING NOTE November 2011

BIIAB Level 3 Diploma in Children s Learning and Development (Early Years Educator) (QCF)

Working Together to Safeguard Children

December General Comments and Observations

on the 27 FEBRUARY 2009

The Open University Widening Access and Success Strategy

Sheffield City Council Draft Commissioning Strategy for services for people with a learning disability and their families September 2014

G20 LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT MINISTERIAL DECLARATION MELBOURNE, SEPTEMBER 2014

Submission. September 2014

EARLY INTERVENTION AND PREVENTION PROGRAMME: WITH CHILDREN WHO DISPLAY CONCERNING SEXUALISED BEHAVIOUR. Report for the Ministry of Justice

Kitchener Downtown Community Health Centre

Children s centre self-evaluation form guidance

Adolescence (13 19 years)

Hampshire Children and Young People s Plan

How To Help People Of North England

EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME FOR ENGLAND Public consultation

1. Executive Summary Introduction Commitment The Legal Context...3

Developing the Young Workforce. Career Education Standard (3-18)

Transcription:

Barnardo s NI Response to the Draft Programme for Government Framework 2016-21 Introduction Barnardo s NI is the largest children s charity in Northern Ireland. We work with almost 11,000 children, young people and families across more than 40 different services and programmes and in over 200 schools. We provide a wide range of services, from working with disabled children, minority ethnic families, looked after children and care leavers, to offering family support and early intervention. We believe that every child deserves the best possible start in life, and our service provision reflects that philosophy. Barnardo s NI welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Draft Programme for Government Framework 2016-21. As well as overarching general comments on the approach of the Framework, we have provided specific recommendations in relation to the proposed outcomes, indicators and measures, with an emphasis on those related to children and young people. Our comments are informed by our extensive experience of working with children and families in Northern Ireland, particularly those who are marginalised. 1. General Comments Barnardo s NI welcomes the Northern Ireland Executive s move towards an outcomes based approach in the next Programme for Government. However, for this approach to be effective, it is important that cross-departmental working is truly implemented. We recommend that more information is provided on the intended structure and processes to be put in place to enable genuine crossdepartmental working. Elements requiring more information include: clarity on overall responsibility and accountability for each outcome and action plan; time bound and specific plans for integrated working; and an outline of a proposed plan for a whole system approach. In addition, we recommend a standardised measurement tool and data collection mechanism is established to ensure progress is tracked robustly. We also recommend that a regular review mechanism is 1

implemented to monitor progress and identify areas for improvement in action plans, indicators and measurement tools. We are disappointed to note the lack of explicit focus on prevention and early intervention throughout the Draft Framework. Specific examples and opportunities are provided below, but in general terms we recommend that recognition of the role of early intervention should be woven throughout the Programme for Government, given that a reported key element of this approach is that the outcomes are designed to stay in place for a generation (page 7, Draft Programme for Government Framework). Our final general point on the approach of the Draft Framework relates to the complexity of the issues. By placing just one lead measure against each indicator, the Framework misses the nuances of each identified area and arguably undermines the need for crossdepartmental working across a range of measures to achieve objectives. Specific examples in relation to children and young people are given below, but we recommend this one indicator = one measure approach is reconsidered to ensure progress against outcomes: our recommendation is that each indicator has at least three meaningful and relevant measures attached to it, with the potential for some measures to be used against more than one indicator. Given the longterm aims captured in the outcomes, it is important that the indicators and measures are appropriately sophisticated now to avoid problems with measurement in the coming years. 2. Outcomes 2.1 Children and Young People We welcome that Outcome 14 explicitly references the need to give our children and young people the best start in life. To strengthen this outcome, we recommend the following changes are made: We welcome that the Executive recognises its role in providing services that protect children from harm (page 44). We recommend that the definition of harm in this instance is defined to recognise the wide range of types of harm that can affect a child, including mental, emotional and developmental harm as well as physical and sexual. We welcome that the Executive notes a commitment to working with a range of stakeholders including providers of services to children and young people (page 44). We recommend explicit 2

reference is given to working with the voluntary and community sector at this point, given the sector s unique positioning in working with children and young people, particularly those from marginalised or disadvantaged backgrounds. We recommend that Outcome 14 specifically acknowledges the barriers to the best start in life for children and young people. In particular, this Outcome should commit to giving all children and young people the best start in life, including marginalised groups such as children of people in prison, looked after children, disabled children and newcomer children. 2.2 Housing We recommend another outcome is added to the current Framework to reflect the importance of safe and sustainable housing in improving wellbeing, tackling disadvantage and driving economic growth. An outcome such as We have safe and affordable housing for everyone would contribute to the Framework s holistic approach to improving lives; we believe neglecting to reference housing in the Outcomes weakens the Framework as it currently does not acknowledge the role of housing (social or otherwise) in improving educational achievement, employment, health and mental health, diversity, offending rates, and equality, as well as the importance of housing as an element of providing meaningful support for young people leaving care and for newcomer families and children. 3. Indicators and Measures 3.1 Children experiencing neglect or abuse We recommend that an additional indicator is introduced to reduce the number of children and young people experiencing neglect or abuse. One of the measurements which could be used for this indicator is a percentage reduction in the incidences of neglect on the Child Protection Register. As our Children s Charter outlines, neglect is one of the most prevalent forms of harm recorded on the Child Protection Register in Northern Ireland. Frequently leading to longterm physical, psychological, behavioural and societal consequences, neglect often occurs alongside other forms of abuse and is a predominant feature in families experiencing multiple adversities (Barnardo s NI and NSPCC NI Children s Charter, May 2016, page 7). We believe this is an important indicator against Outcome 14: We give our children and young people the best start in life, amongst other outcomes, and also complements but does not duplicate other indicators: we therefore recommend it is added to the list of indicators. 3

3.2 Indicator 10: Improve support for looked after children We welcome that this group of children is explicitly referenced in the Draft Framework. We recommend that the indicator is broadened to include young people leaving care and children on the edge of care, as both would also benefit from similarly improved support. The lead measure attached to this indicator ( the % of care leavers who, aged 19, were in education, training or employment ) does not capture the complexity of support required by care experienced young people. Rather, an improved measure of achievement (for example, GCSE attainment) would better reflect improved support for looked after children. As well as this, there are other barriers disproportionately affecting children who are looked after which should be monitored to track improved support for this group. For example, the 2011 Youth Justice Review noted an over-representation of looked after children in the Youth Justice System, with 37% of admissions to the Juvenile Justice Centre (JJC) being children in care. The review also noted the unusually high use of remand in the JJC for looked after children. We therefore recommend that the additional measures used against this indicator include: 1. the number of looked after children affected by the Youth Justice System; 2. the percentage of looked after children achieving 5 A*-C grade GCSEs; and 3. emotional health and wellbeing support provided to looked after children, preferably through an integrated mental health and education model. This would need supported by the collection of comprehensive and disaggregated data on child mental health. 3.3 Indicator 11: Improve educational outcomes We recommend that as well as qualifications at school leaving age, this indicator also uses measures that capture and monitor progress at earlier stages too. Our Children s Charter (Barnardo s NI and NSPCC NI, May 2016, page 18) highlights the need for a consistent framework of standardised assessment, recording and reporting for literacy and numeracy progression across all primary schools. In addition, we recommend this indicator is broadened to capture more holistic, social education to ensure an educational outcome is that young people are prepared for life and employment. For this measurement, better data is required than is currently available: a data collection model similar to that used in the Renfrewshire Health 4

and Wellbeing Survey of secondary school age young people to provide a baseline of their health and wellbeing could be used effectively here. 3.4 Indicators 16, 17 and 18: Young People who are NEET Barnardo s NI believes there should be greater reference to the specific needs of young people who are not in education, employment or training (NEET) throughout the framework document, and particularly under Outcome 14: We give our children and young people. For example, this group should be referenced within the following three indicators, which could be applied to Outcome 14: Indicator 16: Increase the proportion of people in work o The measures should also specifically include an improvement in the rates of young people who are not in education, employment and training (NEET). Indicator 17: Reduce economic inactivity o A measurement relating to a specific reduction in economic inactivity for young people not in education, employment or training (NEET) should be included. In January - March 2016, there were 24,000 young people (aged 16 to 24) in Northern Ireland who were NEET, of which 10,000 were economically inactive. It is also notable that the youth unemployment rate (percentage of economically active 18-24 year olds who are unemployed) at 13.3% is higher than the UK average rate (10.7%) and more than twice the overall rate of unemployment in Northern Ireland. Indicator 18: Increase the proportion of people working in good jobs o Achieving this outcome would significantly depend on how a good job is measured. Barnardo s NI supports the recommendation from the NEET Youth Forum that consideration is given to measuring job satisfaction and the quality of the jobs, i.e. in terms of growth, pay, training, and promotion opportunities. 3.5 Indicator 31: Increase shared space Whilst Barnardo s NI welcomes the inclusion in the Outcomes Framework of positive outcomes such as we are a shared society that respects diversity and we have a more equal society, we are disappointed that this indicator does not reflect that commitment to diversity. By focusing on shared space between Protestants and Catholics, we are concerned that the diversity in our society is not 5

considered. We therefore recommend that the lead measure is amended to monitor the percentage of people who think facilities are shared and open across all religious, ethnic and other groups, in recognition of the need to support integration for newcomer families and reduce discrimination and segregation. 3.6 Indicator 38: Increase the effectiveness of the Justice System This indicator is not currently listed against Outcome 14: We give our children and young people the best start in life. However, whilst we recognise this indicator is currently framed in relation to the speed of the Justice System, we believe there is scope to broaden the interpretation of this indicator and the measures against it. A more effective Justice System would reduce offending and improve outcomes for people affected by the system, including victims and those who have offended. By including measures which seek to increase the use of alternatives to prosecution and divert young people away from both offending and from the Youth or Criminal Justice System, this indicator would support the aims of increasing the effectiveness of the justice system and of giving all our children and young people the best start in life, whilst also complementing the indicators of reducing crime (1) and reducing reoffending (39), the latter of which is listed against Outcome 14. To achieve the outcome of giving our children and young people the best start in life, it is critical that the Executive recognises and addresses the lasting impacts of childhood offending and conviction on a young person s life chances. 3.7 Indicator 42: Increase quality of life for people with disabilities The lead measure for this indicator is the average life satisfaction score of people with disabilities. We recommend that this is widened, at the very least to explicitly include children and young people with disabilities. We are disappointed that this indicator is vague and arguably unambitious: it fails to grasp the scale of the barriers facing children and young people with disabilities and the link to other indicators, such as educational attainment and cultural participation, whilst measures such as the provision of appropriate accommodation and emotional support are notably absent from the Framework. We therefore recommend that this indicator and its associated measures are widened to reflect the complexity of this issue. Conclusion Barnardo s NI welcomes the opportunity to provide a response to the Draft Programme for Government Framework 2016-2021. We have commented on the areas most relevant to the children, young people 6

and families we work with, and we would be happy to further engage with the Executive on these points. We look forward to reading the Draft Programme for Government and action plans when published for consultation later this year. In the meantime, please contact Julia Kenny if you have any questions or require any further information on the issues raised in this response: Julia Kenny Assistant Director, Policy Barnardo s NI Julia.kenny@barnardos.org.uk 028 9067 2366 7