STUDENTS: Promotion and Retention

Similar documents
Within the context of this policy, the following definitions apply: B. Code A letter used to reflect the academic history of a student.

Pre-service Performance Assessment Professional Standards for Teachers: See 603 CMR 7.08

The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support

POLICY 8030 GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS. I. Policy Statement

High School Graduation Requirements

Within the context of this policy, the following definitions apply:

N.J.A.C. 6A:15, BILINGUAL EDUCATION TABLE OF CONTENTS

Schneps, Leila; Colmez, Coralie. Math on Trial : How Numbers Get Used and Abused in the Courtroom. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books, p i.

Instructional Management Plan

GRADING SYSTEMS

REGULATIONSPEQUANNOCK TOWNSHIP

CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT REGULATION

RULES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION, CERTIFICATION AND OVERSIGHT OF COLORADO ONLINE PROGRAMS

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2009 Session

C Reading Sufficiency Act - Programs of Reading Instruction

Principal Performance Review

NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS

How To Run A Gifted And Talented Education Program In Deer Creek

RULE INSTRUCTION: Field Trips. Cultural Exchange. I. Issue

Department of Homeland Security Management Directives System MD Number: 3181 Issue Date: 3/23/2006 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

Advanced Math and Science Academy Charter School

I. Students succeed because teachers plan with individual learning results in mind.

District 2854 Ada-Borup Public Schools. Reading Well By Third Grade Plan. For. Ada-Borup Public Schools. Drafted April 2012

Rules for Excuses from Compulsory Attendance for Home Education in Ohio Revised Code (enacted in 1989):

ACADEMIC POLICIES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE LL.M. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW

Orange County Public Schools. State Accountability System September 2, 2014

INDIVIDUAL MASTERY for: St#: Test: CH 9 Acceleration Test on 29/07/2015 Grade: B Score: % (35.00 of 41.00)

INDIVIDUAL MASTERY for: St#: Test: CH 9 Acceleration Test on 09/06/2015 Grade: A Score: % (38.00 of 41.00)

STUDENT PROGRESSION PLAN

INITIAL PROGRAM APPROVAL TRAINING 2015 TRANSCRIPT

Oregon Administrative Rules Talented and Gifted

Howard Community College Fall Courses for Educators

North Carolina TEACHER. evaluation process. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction

Morris College Teacher Education Curriculum Changes Elementary Education

RULES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION, CERTIFICATION AND OVERSIGHT OF COLORADO ONLINE PROGRAMS

ESL PLAN. Adopted: October 28, 2002 Revised: September 2, Minersville Area School District P.O. Box 787 Minersville, PA 17954

REGULATION ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Oklahoma Profile of State High School Exit Exam Policies 2012

How To Teach English For Other People

RESPONSIBILITIES: 4. An online principal to supervise each IDLA instructor to assure accountability and consistency.

A. Supervised work experience or other outside school experience in accordance with Education Code and 5 CCR 1635.

Zaragoza-Diaz & Associates

Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System

Public Charter Schools

N.J.A.C. 6A:20, ADULT EDUCATION PROGRAMS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Settlement Agreement. Between. The United States. And. The Clay County School District

RELATIONS WITH HOME SCHOOLS REGULATION

Radford University TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM

Smarter Balanced State Tests: Frequently Asked Questions

MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION ELEMENTARY EDUCATION COMPACT SPRING 2002

James Rumsey Technical Institute Employee Performance and Effectiveness Evaluation Procedure

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 7029

Outcomes Data School Psychology EdS Program

ASU College of Education Course Syllabus ED 4972, ED 4973, ED 4974, ED 4975 or EDG 5660 Clinical Teaching

N.J.A.C. 6A:14, SPECIAL EDUCATION TABLE OF CONTENTS

CURRICULUM MAP. Elementary and Early Childhood Program: Alignment of Student Learning Outcomes, Standards, and Assessments

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Policy Bulletin

Nutrition and Culinary Arts I. Example SLO

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. Colorado State Board of Education

TANTASQUA TECHNICAL DIVISION ADMISSIONS POLICY Tantasqua Regional School District

Colorado Professional Teaching Standards

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

The IEP is written by a Team. The Team works together, collaborates, and decides by consensus not by vote. Everyone on the team has an equal voice.

Sec. 1. The following definitions in this section apply throughout this title:

EVALUATION OF DEPARTMENT CHAIR

HOME INSTRUCTION. HOWARD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM Student Services and Special Education Office of Pupil Personnel.

North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards

St. Mary s County Public Schools. Student Service-Learning Implementation Plan

Public Act 101 of 2011: Amendments to the Michigan Teacher Tenure Law

Teacher Education Portfolio Guidelines and Rubric

Curriculum Development, Revision, and Evaluation Processes

The Elementary Education Program Brandeis University Waltham, MA 02454

Reading Results with

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. hb er

Illinois State Board of Education

DATE LAST REVISED: 137-AR. HOME EDUCATION PROGRAMS

5 th Grade Online Single Subject Acceleration FAQ Principals and AIG Teachers July 2013

NAAS - inacol Standards for Quality Online Programs

Section 7: The Five-Step Process for Accommodations for English Language Learners (ELLs)

Professional Education Matrix

SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY. The Teacher as Competent Professional Educator

RULES OF THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION CHAPTER NON-PUBLIC SCHOOL APPROVAL PROCESS TABLE OF CONTENTS

EAST QUOGUE UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAMS FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES UNDER THE IDEA AND NEW YORK EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 89 Policy 4321

CALIFORNIA S TEACHING PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS (TPE)

CHAPTER 16. SPECIAL EDUCATION FOR GIFTED STUDENTS

MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION ELEMENTARY EDUCATION COMPACT

Structured English Immersion Models of the English Language Learner Task Force

Differentiating Instruction for Advanced Learning in the Regular Classroom

RULES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION, CERTIFICATION AND OVERSIGHT OF COLORADO ONLINE PROGRAMS

POLICY 4060 MEDICAID REIMBURSEMENT FOR HEALTH-RELATED SERVICES. I. Policy Statement

Ch. 354 PROFESSIONAL EDUCATORS 22 CHAPTER 354. PREPARATION OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATORS GENERAL PROVISIONS GENERAL CATEGORY PROGRAM DESIGN

1. Standard I: Content Knowledge, Skills, and Concepts for Instructional Technology

TEACHER CERTIFICATION STUDY GUIDE INFORMATION ACCESS AND DELIVERY IN THE LIBRARY MEDIA PROGRAM

SCHOOLWIDE TITLE I PLAN JONESVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL

Middle and High School Learning Environments and the Rhode Island Diploma System

OSU CASCADES. Master of Arts in Teaching Program ESOL Endorsement and/or Middle and High School Education Program Winter 2014

Monroe Public Schools English Language Learner Program Description and Guidelines Revised, Fall 2012

Pre-Requisites EDAM-5001 Early Literacy Guiding Principles and Language

Transcription:

Grading and Reporting I. Purpose STUDENTS: Promotion and Retention To align grading and reporting practices with the curriculum and assessments of Baltimore County Public Schools (BCPS) and Maryland State Board of Education (MSDE) in order to accurately document and report student achievement. II. Definitions A. Body of Evidence A collection of aligned instructional tasks, such as assignments, assessments, homework, presentations, products, and observations, used to determine if a student has met identified curriculum goals. B. Course Expectations Written statements of skills and knowledge the student should attain by the end of a middle or high school course and that have been made available to the student and the student s parent. C. Curriculum The specific blueprint for learning that is derived from content and performance standards. D. Final Evaluation Activity An assessment administered at the end of a middle or high school course that: 1. determines whether students understand and can apply what has been taught; 2. provides students the opportunity to demonstrate knowledge/skills on which they have had time to practice; 3. is based on known criteria; 4. focuses primarily on individual student performance; 5. integrates important skills and knowledge; 6. may take the form of examinations, papers, projects, and/or performance tasks such as discussion, recitation, simulation construction, movement, procedure, or application. E. Grade-level Expectations Statements of skills and knowledge that elementary students should attain in a subject by the end of a grade; what an elementary student is expected to know and be able to do by the end of a grade level in a specific subject, as outlined in the grade/subject curriculum. 1

F. Interim Report A report issued at the midpoint of each marking period that reflects the academic progress of a student through the date of issuance. G. Marking Period Approximately a nine-week period, or quarter, at the end of which individual student s achievement of the concepts and skills taught during that period is reported. H. Parent The biological or adoptive parent, legal guardian, or person acting in the absence of the parent or guardian. III. Standards The Division of Curriculum and Instruction shall develop procedures that ensure a consistent and fair process for evaluating, grading, and reporting student progress and that require the following: A. Meaningful feedback on student achievement to students, parents, teachers, administrators, and the school system. This feedback should provide relevant information for instructional purposes. B. Alignment with BCPS curriculum. C. Consistent high expectations of all students across all courses and programs within and among schools. D. Objective reflection of student achievement compared to grade-level or course expectations outlined in the curriculum as demonstrated on a variety of measures over time. E. Opportunity for students to demonstrate mastery of grade-level or course expectations outlined in the curriculum through a variety of methods addressing multiple learning styles. F. Clear and timely communication to parents and students of grading criteria, grading components, and student progress. G. Active participation in the teaching and learning process and the intellectual exchange that occurs in the classroom, which makes attendance an essential component of a quality educational experience. 2

H. Summative assessments, as grade appropriate, which reflect a student s mastery of grade-level or course material. I. In all Schools: 1. Students and parents will be informed at the beginning of the school year of grade-level and/or course expectations outlined in the curriculum of each course or unit and of the basis upon which student performance will be evaluated. 2. Student grades will be based on the collected body of evidence. 3. Teachers will use a variety of instructional approaches over time to create a body of evidence and monitor student learning of the BCPS curriculum. 4. Student evaluation must reflect the developmental and individual differences of students. 5. Student progress will be evaluated at various stages of instruction and reported in terms of the performance on multiple and varied assessment measures, corresponding with grade-level and course expectations outlined in the curriculum. 6. Teachers will maintain accurate and precise records that support reported achievement. 7. Students and parents will be informed about progress throughout the grading period and teachers are strongly encouraged to provide such information at frequent regular intervals. IV. Evidence of Student Learning A. The Division of Curriculum and Instruction is responsible for developing curricula consistent with BCPS policy and rule that establish grade-level expectations at the elementary level and course expectations at the middle and high school levels aligned with MSDE standards and assessments. B. Teachers will use a variety of assessment approaches over time to create a body of evidence and monitor student learning of BCPS curriculum. Student grades will be based up the body of evidence. C. The body of evidence may include assessment products such as unit assessments, end-of-course assessments, homework, assignments, presentations, products, observations, and/or performance tasks such as discussion, recitation, simulation, construction, movement, procedure, or demonstration of a skill. 3

V. Grades A. Grades must be based on individual mastery of skill and understanding. B. Grades for elementary content areas are based on evidence of the attainment of assigned grade-level or content expectations. C. Grades for middle and high school courses are based on evidence of attainment of course expectations. D. English for speakers of other languages (ESOL) teachers, special educators, and general education teachers who provide instruction will collaboratively examine the body of evidence to determine a student s grade. E. Permissible grade symbols, scales, and procedures used for grades and grade reporting are set forth in the BCPS Grading and Reporting Procedures. VI. Pre-Assessment, Formative Assessments, and Summative Assessments A. Pre-assessments are designed to determine what students know and can do in order to plan instruction. 1. Pre-assessment scores are administered before instruction and may include teacher or system-designed assessments. 2. Pre-assessments may be recorded but cannot be used in the body of evidence to determine a student s marking period or final grade. B. Formative assessments are learning checks or assessments used during the course of instruction that measure student progress and current levels of understanding in relation to the learning targets. Formative assessments are used by teachers to inform and guide subsequent instruction. C. Summative assessments are assessments used to evaluate student learning progress and achievement at the conclusion of a specific instructional periodusually at the end of a project, unit, course, semester, program, or school year. VII. Final Evaluation Activity A. Final evaluation activities are designed to measure student achievement of the course expectations. 4

B. Teachers will follow the BCPS Grading and Reporting Procedures for the implementation of final evaluation activities. VIII. Reporting Student Achievement A. Interim Reports 1. An interim report shall be issued for students in Grades 1-12 at the midpoint of the marking period. B. Report Cards 1. Report cards summarize evidence of student achievement collected throughout the marking period. 2. Parents of students with individual education programs (IEP) will receive supplemental information on progress toward the attainment of IEP goals at the time report cards are issued, consistent with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and state regulation. 3. Parents of English language learners will receive supplemental information on their student s performance in listening, speaking, reading, and writing based on expectations that are appropriate to their English language proficiency level. 4. A report card will be distributed for students in Grades 1-12 each marking period. 5. Instructional staff will follow the BCPS Grading and Reporting Procedures for the completion of report cards at the end of each marking period. IX. Grade Change After marking period grade has been determined, a grade change may be initiated by teachers in unusual cases in which, in their judgment, a course grade should be given which does not correspond to the grade generated using the computation shown in the Grading and Reporting Procedures. Principals must approve and sign all grade changes. X. Computation of Class Rank Quality points and class rank will be determined in accordance with the BCPS Grading and Reporting Procedures. XI. Appeal 5

A. All questions about a student s grade should be directed first to the classroom teacher. B. If the matter remains unresolved, a student and/or his parent may file a complaint with the principal within 15 business days of the report card being issued, indicating the reason for the dispute and the remedy sought. 1. The principal will evaluate the complaint and provide a written response within thirty (30) business days of receiving the complaint. 2. With the exception as outlined in XI.C., the principal s decision is final. C. A student and/or his parent may only appeal the principal s decision for alleged violations of procedures or violations of a student s due process. Otherwise, the principal s decision in the matter is final. Legal References: Related Policies: 20 U.S.C. 1400, et seq., Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) COMAR 13A.05.01.09(B), Report of Progress Board of Education Policy 0100, Equity Board of Education Policy 5120, Attendance and Excuses Board of Education Policy 5200, Promotion, Retention, and Acceleration Board of Education Policy 5250, Graduation Requirements Board of Education Policy 6500, Research and Assessment Rule Approved: 11/21/68 Revised: 06/21/79 Revised: 07/14/83 Revised: 12/06/84 Revised: 10/18/90 Revised: 10/14/97 Revised: 06/09/15 Effective 07/01/16 Superintendent of Schools 6 Copyright 2015 Baltimore County Public Schools. All rights reserved