Hidalgo County, Texas Adult Criminal Justice Data Sheet

Similar documents
Orange County, Texas Adult Criminal Justice Data Sheet

Community Supervision in Texas

Community Supervision Texas Association of Counties October 2015

Criminal Justice 101. The Criminal Justice System in Colorado and the Impact on Individuals with Mental Illness. April 2009

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD. Statewide Criminal Justice Recidivism and Revocation Rates

Criminal and Juvenile Justice Uniform Cost Report

Texas Criminal Justice Coalition Safer, Smarter, and More Cost- Efficient Approaches to Reducing Crime In Texas

What you don t know can hurt you.

FACT SHEET. Views from the National Council on Crime and Delinquency. Youth Under Age 18 in the Adult Criminal Justice System. Christopher Hartney

WRITTEN TESTIMONY SUBMITTED BY ANA YÁÑEZ-CORREA, PH.D. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TEXAS CRIMINAL JUSTICE COALITION

AB 109 is DANGEROUS. Governor Brown signed AB 109 the Criminal Justice Realignment Bill into law on April 5, 2011.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE DIVISION. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) v. ) No. ) (Judge ) ) )

Maryland Courts, Criminal Justice, and Civil Matters

TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY VITA

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD. Criminal Justice Uniform Cost Report

At A Glance. Contact. Two Year State Budget: $122 million - General Fund

WHEN THE 80TH SESSION

Pablo Martinez Ph.D RESUME. Summary

Proposition 5. Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute.

Oranges To Oranges: Comparing The Operational Costs Of Juvenile And Adult Correctional Programs In Texas

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE 700 Civic Center Drive West P.O. Box Santa Ana, CA (877)

The Substance Abuse Felony Punishment Program: Evaluation and Recommendations

Criminal Justice Study Consensus Questions

2011 REGULAR SESSION HB 463 PENAL CODE AND CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES LEGISLATION Full text of the bill:

6/16/2010. Participant. Public Defender Assistant District Attorney. Assessor Counselor

[As Amended by Senate Committee of the Whole] SENATE BILL No By Joint Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice Oversight 1-11

How to Apply for a Pardon. State of California. Office of the Governor

ARTICLE 1.1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE SECOND CHANCE ACT (SCA)

SENTENCING REFORM FOR NONVIOLENT OFFENSES: BENEFITS AND ESTIMATED SAVINGS FOR ILLINOIS

Evaluation of the Performance of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Rehabilitation Tier Programs

Office of the Bexar County Criminal District Attorney

The Impact of Arizona s Probation Reforms in 2010

(1) Sex offenders who have been convicted of: * * * an attempt to commit any offense listed in this subdivision. (a)(1). * * *

ALTERNATIVES TO INCARCERATION IN A NUTSHELL

Colorado Legislative Council Staff Fiscal Note STATE and LOCAL FISCAL IMPACT. Date: Bill Status: Fiscal Analyst:

CRIMINAL JUSTICE ADVISORY COUNCIL ALTERNATIVES TO INCARCERATION REPORT September 8, 2005

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE STATE

COMPARISON OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE STATISTICS

LANCASTER COUNTY ADULT DRUG COURT

Austin Travis County Integral Care Jail Diversion Programs and Strategies

Affordable Care Act: Health Coverage for Justice Involved Individuals

Frequently Asked Questions on 2011 Criminal Justice Realignment

How To Start A Community Corrections Program

[New] Standard 1. Compensation. Standard 2. Duties and Responsibilities of Counsel. Standard 3. Caseload Limits and Types of Cases

Criminal Justice System Commonly Used Terms & Definitions

Texas Civil Commitment-Outpatient Sexually Violent Predator Treatment Program (OSVPTP) Health & Safety Code, Chapter 841

External Advisory Group Meeting June 2, 2015

Communicating the Struggle Between Due Process and Public Safety. National Association of Counties, July 2012

Criminal Justice in Nevada Part I: Overview

BASIC CRIMINAL LAW. Joe Bodiford. Overview of a criminal case Presented by: Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer

Myths about Criminal Justice 17 Summary 18 Key Terms 19 Review Questions 19 In the Field 20 On the Net 20 Critical Thinking Exercises 20

Contra Costa County: A Model for Managing Local Corrections

Determining your parole eligibility

MINNESOTA S EXPERIENCE IN REVISING ITS JUVENILE CODE AND PROSECUTOR INPUT IN THE PROCESS September 1997

Reentry on Steroids! NADCP 2013

AN ACT. The goals of the alcohol and drug treatment divisions created under this Chapter include the following:

County of San Diego SB 618 Reentry Program. May 3, 2007

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION

Criminal Justice 101 and the Affordable Care Act. Prepared by: Colorado Criminal Justice Reform Coalition

CERTIFICATES OF RELIEF FROM DISABILITIES AND CERTIFICATES OF GOOD CONDUCT

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF HOUSE BILL NO. 2055

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD. Adult and Juvenile Correctional Population Projections

Data Management Plan. County of Sonoma CCP Data Management and Evaluation Sub-committee

Adult Probation: Terms, Conditions and Revocation

PROPOSAL. Expansion of Drug Treatment Diversion Programs. December 18, 2007

County of San Diego Public Safety Realignment & Post-Release Community Supervision. Preliminary 2011 Implementation Plan

Display 27: Major Criminal Justice Initiatives in Virginia ( )

PROBATION LENGTH AND CONDITIONS IN KANSAS

STATE OF OKLAHOMA. 1st Session of the 49th Legislature (2003) COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE

History and Goals of the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines

Youth in the Juvenile Justice System: Trends and Solutions

Criminal Justice Quarterly Report January 2009-March 2009

CCDI Paving the Way for Criminal Justice Reform in Colorado

CRIMINAL LAW UPDATE 2014 LEGISLATURE. André de Gruy Capital Defender

Mental Health & Addiction Forensics Treatment

PAROLE IN TEXAS. Answers to Common Questions. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Parole Division. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles

Crime. What is the sequence of events in the criminal justice system? Prosecution and pretrial services Refusal to indict.

Probation and Parole Violations State Responses

Criminal Justice Cross-Training Conference: Community Safety and Crime Reduction via Successful Offender Re-entry into the Community

The Rights of Crime Victims in Texas

An Introduction to the Federal Public Defender=s Office and the Federal Court System

Purpose of the Victim/Witness Unit

Department of Health Services. Alcohol and Other Drug Services Division

CrR 3.1 STANDARDS FOR INDIGENT DEFENSE. [New] Standard 1. Compensation. [Reserved.] Standard 2. Duties and Responsibilities of Counsel

Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE

Part I Improvements to Existing Programs

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs November 3, 2015

Adult Plea Negotiation Guidelines

DUI HANDBOOK. Driving Under the Influence in Pennsylvania. The Martin Law Firm, P.C.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT CRIMINAL JUSTICE. Report to the Texas Sunset Commission Self Evaluation Report

POTTER, RANDALL AND ARMSTRONG COUNTIES DRUG COURT: A VIABLE COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS RESOURCE

A Better Model: Ensuring Equal Justice for Persons With Mental Illness & Mental Retardation

Three Year Recidivism Tracking of Offenders Participating in Substance Abuse Treatment Programs

LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Sixty-third Legislature First Regular Session IN THE SENATE SENATE BILL NO. 1026

Title 34-A: CORRECTIONS

Written statement of the American Psychological Association. Hearing before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary

How To Fund A Mental Health Court

2010 CRIMINAL CODE SENTENCING PROVISIONS. Effective July 29, 2010

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SENATE BILL NO. 375

Transcription:

Hidalgo County, Texas Adult Criminal Justice Data Sheet For more information, contact Dr. Ana Yáñez- Correa at acorrea@texascjc.org, or (512) 587-7010. The Texas Criminal Justice Coalition seeks the implementation of realistic criminal justice strategies that safely reduce the State s costly over- reliance on incarceration creating stronger families, less taxpayer waste, and safer communities. Below, we have provided comprehensive information about Hidalgo County s adult population at various stages of criminal justice system involvement. We have also provided the associated costs at each stage to highlight the significant expense to incarcerate or supervise these populations. Total County Population Hidalgo County Population: 1 797,810 STAGE 1: Pretrial Jail Detention Of all the people incarcerated in Texas county jails, more than half (on average) have not been convicted of the crime for which they are accused. They are in pretrial detention, awaiting trial. 2 Many men and women cannot afford the bond that would allow them to return to the community prior to trial; others are not given that option by judges, despite presenting little flight risk or posing no danger to public safety. This leads to unnecessary and costly jail overcrowding. Hidalgo County Jail Population: 3 1,107 Hidalgo County Jail Pretrial Population: 4 860 (78%)» Number of Pretrial Defendants with Misdemeanor Charges: 153» Number of Pretrial Defendants with State Jail Charges: 139» Number of Pretrial Defendants with Felony Charges: 568 Statewide Average Cost to County Taxpayers to Incarcerate One Individual in County Jail, Per Day (Pretrial or Post- Conviction): 5 $59.00 Average Cost to Hidalgo County Taxpayers to Incarcerate the Entire Hidalgo County Jail Pretrial Population, Per Day: $50,740» Average Cost to Incarcerate Pretrial Defendants with Misdemeanor Charges: $9,027» Average Cost to Incarcerate Pretrial Defendants with State Jail Charges: $8,201» Average Cost to Incarcerate Pretrial Defendants with Felony Charges: $33,512 Page 1

STAGE 2: Court- Appointed Counsel Any indigent individual in Texas charged with a Class B misdemeanor or higher is entitled to court- appointed representation. However, counties pay for 83% of indigent defense costs, statewide. The state pays only 17%. 6 As such, counties with already strained budgets may struggle to provide legal representation for all defendants who request an attorney. Number of Individuals (Adult and Juveniles) in Hidalgo County Receiving Constitutionally Guaranteed Representation (Court- Appointed Counsel): 7 13,205» Number of Adults with Misdemeanor Charges: 8,106» Number of Adults with Felony Charges: 4,202» Number of Juveniles with Cases: 837» Number of Individuals with Appeals Cases: 33» Number of Individuals with Capital Cases: 27 Total Indigent Defense Expenditures Paid by Hidalgo County in FY 2012: 8 $6,088,763.25 State Formula- Based Grant 9 Amount Received by Hidalgo County to Provide Indigent Defense Services: 10 $719,373.25 (12%) STAGE 3 Option A Diversion from Incarceration to Community- Based Supervision (Probation) Judges have the option of sentencing certain individuals to probation instead of prison or jail. Not only is probation over 30 times cheaper than prison or jail, 11 it is more effective than incarceration at lowering rates of re- offending, especially when paired with rehabilitative programming. 12 As such, investments in probation help boost public safety in the long term and reduce the likelihood of victims. Number of Individuals in Hidalgo County on Community Supervision (Probation): 13 9,131» Number of Individuals on Misdemeanor Probation: 2,638» Number of Individuals on Felony Probation: 6,493 Statewide Average Cost to the State to Have One Individual on Probation, Per Day: 14 $1.38 Average Cost to the State for the Entire Hidalgo County Probation Population, Per Day: $ 12,600.78 Page 2

STAGE 3 Option B Incarceration in County Jail, State Jail, Prison, or a Designated Treatment Facility Texas has various types of correctional facilities to house individuals with misdemeanor or felony convictions. Our 246 county jails house individuals with both misdemeanor and felony offenses (including state jail felonies and felonies of various degrees); they also temporarily house parole violators and individuals awaiting transfer to another type of correctional facility. 15 Texas 20 state jails 16 house individuals with offenses of various levels. 17 Our 57 prisons 18 house individuals with felony or capital offenses. Our 5 Substance Abuse Felony Punishment Facilities (SAFPFs) 19 house individuals with felony offenses who have been placed in this structured treatment regimen. 20 Correctional Facilities in Hidalgo County Hidalgo County Jail Hidalgo County Private Jail (Federal inmates) Lopez State Jail (Male) Segovia Pre- Release Facility (Male) Misdemeanor Offenses Number of Individuals Sentenced to Hidalgo County Jail: 21 49 Statewide Average Cost to County Taxpayers Incarcerate One Individual in County Jail, Per Day: 22 $59.00 Average Cost to Hidalgo County Taxpayers to Incarcerate the Entire Population of Individuals Sentenced to Hidalgo County Jail, Per Day: $2,891.00 Felony Offenses Number of Individuals from Hidalgo County Sentenced to State- Level Confinement: 3,155» Number of Such Individuals Sentenced to State Jail: 23 251 (8%) Average Cost to the State to Incarcerate One Individual in State Jail, Per Day: 24 $42.90 Average Cost to the State to Incarcerate the Entire Population of Individuals from Hidalgo County Sentenced to State Jail, Per Day: $10,767.90» Number of Such Individuals Sentenced to Prison: 25 2,858 (91%) Average Cost to the State to Incarcerate One Individual in Prison, Per Day: 26 $50.04 Average Cost to the State to Incarcerate the Entire Population of Individuals from Hidalgo County Sentenced to Prison, Per Day: $143,014.32 Page 3

» Number of Such Individuals Placed in a SAFPF: 27 46 (1%) Average Cost to the State to Place One Individual in a SAFPF, Per Day: 28 $63.19 Average Cost to the State to House and Treat the Entire Population of Individuals from Hidalgo County Placed in a SAFPF, Per Day: $2,906.74 STAGE 4: Community- Based Supervision After Release From Prison (Parole or Community Supervision) The vast majority of people who are incarcerated in state- level corrections facilities are ultimately released back into the community. Upon leaving state jail, most individuals are left unsupervised. Upon leaving prison, however, individuals are either supervised on parole, supervised on community supervision (e.g., shock probation), or released on flat discharge (unsupervised). Total Number of Individuals Released from State- Level Confinement to Hidalgo County: 29 2,155» Number of Individuals Released to Community Supervision: 30 125 (6%) Statewide Average Cost to the State to Have One Individual on Probation, Per Day: 31 $1.38 Average Cost to the State for the Entire Hidalgo County Post- Release Probation Population, Per Day: $172.50» Number of Individuals Released to Parole Supervision: 32 1,144 (53%) Statewide Average Cost to the State to Have One Individual on Parole, Per Day: 33 $3.63 Average Cost to the State for the Entire Hidalgo County Parole Population, Per Day: $4,152.72» Number of Individuals Released on Flat Discharge: 34 886 (41%) Return to Prison Number of Individuals in Hidalgo County who Returned to Prison: 35 127 Page 4

References 1 United States Census Bureau, State & County Quick Facts: Texas Hidalgo County; available at http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/48/48215.html. Figure reflects Population, 2011 estimate. 2 Texas Commission on Jail Standards, Texas County Jail Population, December 1, 2012. 12- month average pretrial population totaled just over 57%. 3 Texas Commission on Jail Standards (TCJS), Abbreviated Population Report for 12/1/2012. NOTE: Hidalgo County also has a private county jail that houses federal inmates, but those individuals are not included here. 4 Ibid. Total includes Pretrial Felons, Pretrial Misd[emeanors] and Pretrial S[tate] J[ail] F[elonies]. 5 Brandon Wood, then- Assistant Director of the Texas Commission on Jail Standards, in presentation at American Bar Association, Criminal Justice Section, Roundtable on Pretrial Detention in Texas, held in Austin, Texas, March 30, 2012. Figure reflects cost per jail bed per day. 6 Texas Indigent Defense Commission, FY 2011 Annual and Expenditure Report, January 2012, p. 21; available via http://www.txcourts.gov/tidc/annual_reports_archives.asp. P. 21: Total indigent defense expenditures in FY11 were of $198,364,999. Of that amount counties funded $164,724,287 and State through the Commission funded $33,640,712 through its grants program. 7 Data obtained from Texas Indigent Defense Commission web portal at http://tfid.tamu.edu/public.net/ ( Quick Stats 2012 ), as reported by each county s auditor or person designated by the Commissioner s Court. 8 Ibid. 9 This is the amount of the formula grants provided to Hidalgo County in fiscal year 2011. In 2002, the Texas Legislature began providing state funds for indigent defense and directed the Texas Indigent Defense Commission to distribute these funds in the form of grants to counties to help counties improve their indigent defense systems and promote compliance with the requirements of state law relating to indigent defense. 10 Data obtained from Texas Indigent Defense Commission web portal at http://tfid.tamu.edu/public.net/. 11 Legislative Budget Board (LBB), Criminal Justice Uniform Cost Report, Fiscal Years 2010 to 2012, Submitted to the 83 rd Texas Legislature, January 2013, p. 8 [Fiscal Year 2012 prison costs: $50.04 per bed per day; FY 2012 state jail costs: $42.90 per bed per day] and p. 14 [FY 2012 probation costs to state: $1.38 per participant per day]; available at www.lbb.state.tx.us/public_safety_criminal_justice/uniform_cost/criminal%20justice%20uniform%20cost%20re port%20fiscal%20years%202010%20to%202012.pdf. 12 While on probation, individuals can serve their sentence while taking part in rehabilitative programs, maintaining family relationships, and remaining a participant in the community critical to reducing the flow to prison without jeopardizing public safety. Indeed, Texas has seen an increase in probation felony placements on community supervision, and yet a simultaneous decrease in revocations. Specifically, while the average Felony Direct Supervision population increased sharply from 2006 to 2010, jumping from 158,479 in 2006 to 172,893 in 2010, the average revocation rate decreased, settling at 14.7% in FY 2010. From 2010 through 2012, revocations further fell to 14.5%, while the Felony Direct Supervision population fell slightly to 168,487. See: Legislative Budget Board, Statewide Criminal Justice Recidivism and Revocation Rates: Submitted to the 83 rd Texas Legislature, January 2013, p. 20; available at www.lbb.state.tx.us/public_safety_criminal_justice/recrev_rates/statewide%20criminal%20justice%20recidivis m%20and%20revocation%20rates2012.pdf. Regarding rehabilitative programming: According to the National Institute of Corrections at the U.S. Department of Justice, punishment increases an individual s inclination towards criminal activity by.07%; treatment decreases an individual s inclination towards criminal activity by 15%; and cognitive skills programs decrease an individual s inclination towards criminal activity by 29%, making them most effective at decreasing criminal behavior. See: Judge Marion F. Edwards, Reduce Recidivism in DUI Offenders: Add a Cognitive- Behavioral Program Component, 2006, p. 3. 13 Community Justice Assistance Division (CJAD), FY2011 Offenders Under Direct Supervision by CSCD, provided to Texas Criminal Justice Coalition on June 12, 2012. Data available upon request. 14 LBB, Criminal Justice Uniform Cost Report, p. 14. Figure reflects FY 2012 state cost of community supervision. 15 TCJS, Abbreviated Population Report. 16 Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), Unit Directory; available at: http://www.tdcj.state.tx.us/unit_directory/index.html. Page 5

17 Mike Ward, State jails struggle with lack of treatment, rehab programs, Austin American- Statesman, December 30, 2012; John Hurt, a spokesman for the Texas Department of Criminal Justice [ ] said that state jails housed 25,458 of the approximately 152,000 convicts in state- run lockups at the end of October. Of those, just 11,802 were serving time for state jail offenses. Another 13,530 were regular convicts, some enrolled in treatment programs and others awaiting a slot in special drug therapy prisons. 18 TDCJ, Unit Directory. 19 Ibid. 20 A SAFPF is an intensive six- month therapeutic and education program (or nine- month program for prisoners with special needs), typically assigned as a condition of community supervision or a modification of parole/community supervision. 21 TCJS, Abbreviated Population Report. Total includes Conv[icted] Felons Sentenced to County Jail time, Conv[icted] Misd[emeanants], and Conv[icted] S[tate] J[ail] F[elons] Sentenced to Co. Jail Time. 22 Brandon Wood, then- Assistant Director of the Texas Commission on Jail Standards, in presentation at American Bar Association, Criminal Justice Section, Roundtable on Pretrial Detention in Texas, held in Austin, Texas, March 30, 2012. Figure reflects cost per jail bed per day. 23 Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), Statistical Report: Fiscal Year 2012, p.14. 24 LBB, Criminal Justice Uniform Cost Report, p. 8. 25 TDCJ, Statistical Report: Fiscal Year 2012, p. 14. 26 LBB, Criminal Justice Uniform Cost Report, p. 8. 27 TDCJ, Statistical Report: Fiscal Year 2012, p. 14. 28 LBB, Criminal Justice Uniform Cost Report, p. 8. 29 TDCJ, Statistical Report: Fiscal Year 2012, p. 39. 30 TDCJ, Statistical Report: Fiscal Year 2012, p. 48. 31 LBB, Criminal Justice Uniform Cost Report, p. 14. Figure reflects FY 2012 state cost of community supervision. 32 TDCJ, Statistical Report: Fiscal Year 2012, p. 51. 33 LBB, Criminal Justice Uniform Cost Report, p. 13. 34 TDCJ, Statistical Report: Fiscal Year 2012, p. 45. 35 Individuals could return to prison after being revoked while on parole, Discretionary Mandatory Supervision (DMS), or Mandatory Supervision (MS). DMS: In 1995, the Texas Legislature gave the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles (BPP) the authority to review eligible individuals whose offenses were committed on or after September 1, 1996, for possible release to Discretionary Mandatory Supervision. The BPP must review eligible prisoners on or before their discretionary mandatory eligibility date, and it has the discretion to deny release. MS: This is a type of release from prison provided by law for restricted categories of returning individuals. Eligible individuals are released on MS when their served calendar time plus their good time credit equals the length of their prison sentence. Under previous law (effective until August 31, 1996), release to MS was automatic, with no requirement for release approval from the BPP. For Hidalgo County revocation total, see TDCJ, Statistical Report: Fiscal Year 2012, p. 32. Page 6