Similar documents
3/19/2013. How to Become a Dyslexia Therapist in Mississippi. Disclaimers. What is Dyslexia? Dyslexia definition, continued

Dyslexia Certificate Program Level 1 Winter/Spring 2016

Students with Reading Problems Their Characteristics and Needs

Reading Competencies

Methods for Increasing the Intensity of Reading Instruction for Students with Intellectual Disabilities

Identifying dyslexia and other learning problems using LASS

SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES (SLD)

Adopted by the Board of Directors: November 12, 2002

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION. greater reading success as evident through standardized testing and overall gains in

How To Teach Reading

Florida Center for Reading Research RAVE-O

Oral Fluency Assessment

Learning Today Smart Tutor Supports English Language Learners

Critical Review: Examining the Effectiveness of the Orton-Gillingham Reading Approach for Poor Readers in Elementary School

TEACHERS OF READING.

SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY

The National Reading Panel: Five Components of Reading Instruction Frequently Asked Questions

READING WITH. Reading with Pennsylvania Reading Specialist Certificate

Requirements EDAM WORD STUDY K-3: PRINT AWARENESS, LETTER KNOWLEDGE, PHONICS, AND HIGH FREQUENCY WORDS

Best Practices. Using Lexia Software to Drive Reading Achievement

Chapter 2 - Why RTI Plays An Important. Important Role in the Determination of Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) under IDEA 2004

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR TEACHING READING IN HAWAII SCHOOLS

Dyslexia (Specific Reading Disability)

There are basically three options available for overcoming barriers to learning:

Language Reading Connection

Targeted Reading Intervention for Students in Grades K-6 Reading results. Imagine the possibilities.

Kings Canyon Unified School District Gifted and Talented Education Program GATE

Options for Addressing Dyslexia in Institutions of Higher Education (IHE) Teacher Preparation Programs

Creating a Culture of Literacy: A Guide for Middle and High School Principals

HOW DO YOU SCREEN. For information about appropriate reading screening and dyslexia, please refer to the attached documents in the appendix:

Disability Services Office Health, Counselling & Disability Services

St. Petersburg College. RED 4335/Reading in the Content Area. Florida Reading Endorsement Competencies 1 & 2. Reading Alignment Matrix

The University of North Carolina at Pembroke Academic Catalog

The Importance of Phonics: Securing Confident Reading

There are many reasons why reading can be hard. This handout describes

Pre-Requisites EDAM-5001 Early Literacy Guiding Principles and Language

Pasco County Schools. Add-On Program. Reading K-12. Endorsement

Nevis Public School District #308. District Literacy Plan Minnesota Statute 120B.12, Learning together... Achieving quality together.

This article is adapted from a previous article Bad Language or Good, first published in the Dyslexia Yearbook in 1999.

Patterns of Strengths and Weaknesses in L.D. Identification

Learning Disabilities. Strategies for the classroom

Dyslexia/Reading Disorder

AND LEARNING 21st Century Teaching and Learning

Exceptional Student Education K 12

PATHWAYS TO READING INSTRUCTION INCREASING MAP SCORES HEIL, STEPHANIE. Submitted to. The Educational Leadership Faculty

Information Provided by the Qualitative Reading Inventory-5

Reading Policy. Contents. 1. Our aim 2. Reading procedures 3. Assessment of reading 4. Phonics 5. Layered approach 6. Guided reading 7.

Phonics and Word Work

LEARNING DIFFICULTIES:

The MetLife Survey of

Curriculum and Instruction

Response to Intervention Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Test Administrator Requirements

Using Your RTI Model to Differentiate and Support the ELA CCLS. Kay Stahl, Ed. D RTI-TAC Webinar Series Strand 3 kay.stahl@nyu.

Examples of IEP Goals and Objectives

rse Learning Theory Epistomology Motivation Memory Child Development Developmental Kinesiology Cognitive Psychology Neuro-Linguistics

Reading Instruction and Reading Achievement Among ELL Students

Foundation Paper Supporting Special Education Students with READ 180

PAMELA MASLIN. Permission to reproduced this work for personal or classroom use is granted,

Reading Specialist (151)

1 REVISOR C. show verification of completing a Board of Teaching preparation program

READING SPECIALIST STANDARDS

Houston Area Development - NAP Community Literacy Collaboration

Keir Hardie Primary School. Assessment and Marking Policy

The Response to Intervention of English Language Learners At- Risk for Reading Problems

HOW SHOULD READING BE TAUGHT?

Scientifically Based Reading Programs. Marcia L. Kosanovich, Ph.D. Florida Center for Reading Research SLP Academy Fall, 2005

TRAINGING GUIDE. To Log in type the web address into your browser. This will open the Reading A-Z home page.

English for Success. Ages. Levels. Features

High Learning Potential Assessment

Reading Disability and the Brain

TAS Instructional Program Design/ Scientifically-based Instructional Strategies

Haberdashers Adams Federation Schools

Wave 3 Intervention Guide Intervention Briefing Sheets plus Examples of Intervention Monitoring Templates

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Copyright 2013, The International Dyslexia Association (IDA).

BA Primary Education (QTS) Professional Training and Development Handbook Years 2 & 3 Teaching Phonics

Gifted & Talented Program Description

Using Direct Instruction Programs as Intervention Programs in Grades K 3

To learn to read is to light a fire; every syllable that is spelled out is a spark." Victor Hugo, Les Miserables

Writing Instructionally Appropriate IEPs

Postgraduate Certificate and Diploma Programme in Dyslexia and Literacy. Accredited by Middlesex University. Outline Syllabus Academic Year

C Reading Sufficiency Act - Programs of Reading Instruction

Discriminating between Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Developmental Dyslexia: Differential Diagnosis and Interventions.

Leveled Literacy Intervention (LLI) consists of a series of planned lessons designed to provide supplementary instruction

This edition of Getting Schooled focuses on the development of Reading Skills.

Second Grade Core Knowledge Addendum


DEEPER LEARNING COMPETENCIES April 2013

Scientifically Based Reading Programs: What are they and how do I know?

Identifying Students with Specific Learning Disabilities. Part 1: Introduction/Laws & RtI in Relation to SLD Identification

Crockett Elementary Response to Intervention Guide

Policy/Program Memorandum No. 8

FCRR Technical Report #8 Dyslexia: A Brief for Educators, Parents, and Legislators in Florida

Reading Recovery in New Zealand: Uptake, implementation, and outcomes, especially in relation to Mäori and Pasifika students

Standard Two: Knowledge of Mathematics: The teacher shall be knowledgeable about mathematics and mathematics instruction.

Effective Interventions for Older Students With Reading Disabilities: Lessons From Research

Eligibility / Staffing Determination EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE. Date of Meeting:

Dr. Scott T. Ebbrecht Director, Assessment and Alternative Education

Standard 1. Foundational Knowledge Candidates have knowledge of the foundations of reading and writing processes and instruction.

the sites selected for participation in the study were targeted Assistance schools with a history of unacceptably low achievement.

Transcription:

Children s Dyslexia Centers, Inc. A Scottish Rite Charity since 1994 Making a Difference in the Lives of Children Research Summary 2013 www.childrensdyslexiacenters.org

Background Dyslexia is the most common learning disability, found in about 10-15% of the population (some scientists and researchers estimate that up to 20% of the population has dyslexia). Dyslexia is language- based and affects the way in which children learn to read, spell, and write. Scientific research leads researchers to believe that dyslexia is a result of a difference in how the brain processes information. Dyslexia affects boys and girls equally and is inherited. Children with dyslexia tend to have average or above average intelligence. There is no cure for dyslexia and it has lifelong implications. Based on early research into this learning difference, providing a multisensory, structured approach to language instruction by qualified professionals can result in improved reading, spelling, and writing skills. The definition of dyslexia, as adopted by the International Dyslexia Association (IDA) and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) is as follows: Dyslexia is a specific learning disability that is neurological in origin. It is characterized by difficulties with accurate and/or fluent word recognition and by poor spelling and decoding abilities. These difficulties typically result from a deficit in the phonological component of language that is often unexpected in relation to other cognitive abilities and the provision of effective classroom instruction. Secondary consequences may include problems in reading comprehension and reduced reading experience that can impede the growth of vocabulary and background knowledge. Every day, children with dyslexia attend school, struggling in all areas due to difficulty learning to read, write, and spell. These children are often frustrated by their daily struggles which may extend beyond academic difficulties into social and emotional difficulties. Children who do not succeed in school often develop emotional and/or behavioral issues, drop out of high school, work in low- paying jobs, develop substance abuse issues, and end up in our prison systems. Dyslexia can be remediated successfully by properly trained professionals. Early identification for children at risk of having difficulty learning to read and early intervention allow children the best opportunities for bright futures. For over two decades, the Scottish Rite Masons, Northern Masonic Jurisdiction, have been national leaders in the effort to help children and their families overcome the painful obstacles of dyslexia. With more than 45 active Dyslexia Centers in 13 states, the Children's Dyslexia Centers tackle the challenge of dyslexia head- on, both by providing an educational treatment for children with dyslexia and training qualified individuals to be highly skilled and dedicated tutors. In addition, the Children s Dyslexia Centers, Inc. has been collecting data on the program since it was founded. The data can be provided to scientific and educational researchers. In July 2011, the Children s Dyslexia Centers, Inc. granted permission for an independent team of researchers to analyze the intake assessments (conducted by qualified professionals outside our organization) and baseline and progress assessments (conducted by qualified personnel from our Centers). The research team consisted of G. Reid Lyon, Ph. D., Angela Dougall, Anna E. Fitzhugh, and Timothy N. Odegard, Ph. D. The team s focus

was on identifying different cognitive profiles in children to see if there was a difference in how those children responded to the educational treatment provided at the Centers. The research team had 1075 children who had participated in the program for two years for their final sample. Children attend 50- minute tutoring sessions twice a week, averaging about hours of instruction in two years. Assessments Children who attend the Children s Dyslexia Centers have baseline and annual progress assessments done using the following assessments: Woodcock Reading Mastery Test III (WMRT- III) Test of Written Spelling 4 (TWS- 4) Test of Word Reading Efficiency 2 (TOWRE- 2) Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing 2 (CTOPP- 2) Results* The current analyses investigated growth in students performance across five written language skills monitored during the course of reading intervention: single word identification, phonological decoding, reading fluency, reading comprehension, and spelling. Longitudinal analyses revealed significant gains over time for all measured reading abilities; however, differential levels of ability were noted across reading outcomes. In general, students closed the gap with their age- equivalent peers on most measures, moving from below- average scores on standardized reading assessments at baseline to near average or average- range scores after one to two years of instruction. After one year of intervention, mean student scores advanced into the average age- based range of ability for decoding and passage comprehension. These scores continued to increase during the second year and were the strongest of the five measures of written language skills at the end of the 2- year period. Although these skills were relatively strong at baseline, significant gains were made over the course of the program. These findings suggest a highly responsive nature of these skills to the type of explicit individualized instruction provided by the Children s Dyslexia Centers. Conversely, for word identification, reading fluency, and spelling, although significant gains are reported for all three measures, student means remained below the average range by the end of treatment. These skills have been suggested to be less responsive to intervention, and may take additional instruction and/or practice to fully remediate. Taken together, findings suggest that the method of instruction used in the current intervention is effective at increasing the accuracy with which students are reading, as well as their ability to glean information from the text. These findings support the use of sequential, multisensory phonics- based programs in remediating reading difficulties, regardless of diagnosis or cognitive profile. *A. E. Fitzhugh, T. N. Odegard, and G. R. Lyon (2013). Variations in the cognitive profiles of children with reading disabilities and response to instruction. Unpublished manuscript. Presented at the International Dyslexia Association s Annual Conference, Nov. 7, 2013, New Orleans, LA.

Key Findings: Students receiving remedial reading instruction from the Children s Dyslexia Centers showed significant growth in all reading and writing skills o Word Identification o Word Attack o Comprehension o Fluency o Spelling Students exhibited greatest gains in word attack and spelling, which are crucial skills in fostering accurate independent reading and writing ability. Significant gains in all skills were made over the first year of treatment, as well as continued gains throughout the second year. Within the first year of treatment, average student performance on Word Attack and Comprehension advanced into the average range for their age group. 120 WriHen Language Performance Measures 110 Word ID Word Agack Comprehension Fluency Spelling Figure 1a. Linear representation of student means across treatment.

110 WriHen Language Performance Measures s Year 2 Year 1 Baseline Figure 1b. Additive depiction of student scores and growth over the course of intervention. Word AHack Figure 2. Average student scores for phonological decoding over the course of treatment.

Comprehension Figure 3. Average student scores for reading comprehension over the course of treatment. Word ID Figure 4. Average student scores for word identification over the course of treatment.

Fluency Figure 5. Average student scores for reading fluency over the course of treatment. Spelling Figure 6. Average student scores for spelling over the course of treatment.