Transforming Rehabilitation: A revolution in the way we manage offenders



Similar documents
Criminal justice policy and the voluntary sector

Taking Account of Maturity. A Guide for Probation Practitioners

Summary: Analysis & Evidence Policy Option 1 Description: Offender Rehabilitation Bill FULL ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT

Proven Re-offending Statistics Quarterly Bulletin July 2010 to June 2011, England and Wales

AND JUSTICE FOR ALL? 33

Women in the penal system

Transforming Rehabilitation A Strategy for Reform. Response to Consultation CP(R)16/2013

The criminal justice system: landscape review

No.1 Why reducing drug-related crime is important, and why the new government needs to act

Transforming Rehabilitation A revolution in the way we manage offenders. January 2013

Court-mandated treatment under the Transforming Rehabilitation agenda: New policy direction, or more of the same?

BRIEFING NOTE November 2011

The future of the criminal justice system

ABOUT THE COMMUNITY PAYBACK ORDER

Service Specification for Rehabilitation Services In Custody. Service Specification Document

SUMMARY INFORMATION ON PROBATION IN ENGLAND AND WALES

Nick Wilson Chair of YSS Management Board Surrey Youth Support Service. 23rd January Dear Nick Wilson,

UNIT 22: Care and rehabilitation of offenders (LEVEL 3)

Pre-sentence work The Jersey experience. Brian Heath Chief Probation Officer Jersey Probation and After Care Service

Evaluation Of The Transitional Support Scheme (TSS)

Assess the purpose of the Criminal Justice System and the role of the Ministry of Justice.

INTEGRATED OFFENDER MANAGEMENT KEY PRINCIPLES

Statistical Bulletin

Probation in England and Wales Systems for Delivering Effective Practice

Prison Reform Trust consultation submission. More effective responses to anti-social behaviour

HANDOUT 1: Purpose and Principles of Sentencing in Canada

Hidden Sentence Training

WORKING WITH YOUNG OFFENDERS The Foyer Federation Resettlement & Rehabilitation Strategy

Service Specification for Support Delivery of Alcohol Treatment Requirement. Service Specification Document

The key questions for the study translated into the following research objectives:

Bail and Remand The Scottish Executive Action Plan

REHABILITATION PROGRAMME MARKET ENGAGEMENT, MAY Payment Mechanism Straw Man

CAJ s submission no CAJ s Response to the Consultation on Bail in Criminal Proceedings. January 2011

Page 1. HC Deb, 12 June 2014, c319w 2. Impact Assessment: Transforming Youth Custody 3

Service Specification for Support Delivery of the Drug Rehabilitation Requirement. Service Specification Document

No.3 A successful approach to tackling drug-related crime

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the review of the Bail Act 1978 (NSW) and Bail Bill 2010.

Explanatory Notes to Criminal Justice And Court Services Act

REPORT TO CRIME & DISORDER OVERVIEW & SCRUTINY PANEL. Title: OVERVIEW OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. Date: 27 th October 2009

Dual diagnosis: a challenge for the reformed NHS and for Public Health England

Alcohol and Re-offending Who Cares?

PCA submission to the Review of Veterans within the Criminal Justice System

References/Resources Information in respect of: Social work, criminal justice and mental health the business of all social workers

Secure Colleges and Their Students

Prison Reform Trust response to the Ministry of Justice consultation, Punishment and reform: effective community sentences

ABERDEEN CITY COUNCIL. Social Care and Wellbeing Adult Services Sub-Committee

Youth to adult transition principles and guidance (Wales)

The Government's Drug Strategy

Offender Services and Dual Diagnosis

The Start of a Criminal Career: Does the Type of Debut Offence Predict Future Offending? Research Report 77. Natalie Owen & Christine Cooper

Criminal justice. Areas for action. Criminal Justice Alliance

Transforming Rehabilitation. Offender Rehabilitation Act BeNCH CRC

Defendants charged with serious violent and sexual offences (including murder)

Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 Consultation paper

The Scaled Approach and the Youth Rehabilitation Order

Consideration of equalities impacts

Community Remedy. Introduction

Offenders with Learning Disabilities

A Technical Guide to Developing a Social Impact Bond: Criminal Justice

National Offender Management Service

Crisis response to the consultation on the 2010 Drug Strategy September 2010

Social Impact Bonds. Unlocking investment in rehabilitation

Transforming Rehabilitation

National Offender Management Service Annual Report 2011/12: Management Information Addendum

SOCIAL INVESTMENT INSIGHTS SERIES January 2015

Our vision is to create lasting change by breaking the cycle of re-offending.

Clinks- Home Office Evaluation Report

Legislative Council Panel on Administration of Justice and Legal Services. Restorative Justice for Juveniles Offenders. Victim Participation

Transforming Rehabilitation A revolution in the way we manage offenders

Rehabilitation programs for young offenders: Towards good practice? Andrew Day. Forensic Psychology Research Group. University of South Australia

Drug and Alcohol Recovery Pilots. Lessons learnt from Co-Design and commissioning with payment by results

Breaking the Cycle: Effective Punishment, Rehabilitation and Sentencing of Offenders. Response by the Children s Legal Centre

Transforming Rehabilitation: a revolution in the way we manage offenders. Response from Bail for Immigration Detainees, February 2013

Offender Rehabilitation Bill

Understanding the Costs and Savings to Public Services of Different Treatment Pathways for Clients Dependent on Opiates

Women, Punishment and Human Rights

Centre for Criminal Justice Studies School of Law University of Leeds. Research Studentship

Joint Audit Committee. Warwickshire and West Mercia Police and Crime Commissioner. Criminal Justice Boards

Services to Young Offenders

U R Boss: Legal service shaped by young people in custody. Evaluation for the Howard League for Penal Reform

1.1 Full name: Social Work Practitioner Youth Justice

Mental Health. Service Tiers

Target Operating Model. Rehabilitation Programme

Take Action Less crime, safer communities, fewer people in prison

ADVANCE Team Leader JOB DESCRIPTION

Learning from projects working with ex-offenders

Explaining Criminal careers: implications for justice policy

Changes to Rehabilitation Services for Offenders TRANSFORMING REHABILITATION

Crime & Homelessness

Dear Students of Social Work,

The Mental Health Treatment Requirement

Prison Reform Trust response to Transforming Rehabilitation

BREAKING THE CYCLE: EFFECTIVE PUNISHMENT, REHABILITATION AND SENTENCING OF OFFENDERS

MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL REPORT FOR INFORMATION. The work of the Criminal Justice System

Summary Document: Rapid Appraisal of the Liverpool Drugs Intervention Programme January 2005

The Salvation Army New Zealand Fiji and Tonga Territory Submission

The Alameda County Model of Probation: Juvenile Supervision

USER VOICE. Why We Exist

SENTENCES IN THE COMMUNITY. Reforms to restore credibility, protect the public and cut crime

Transcription:

Transforming Rehabilitation: A revolution in the way we manage offenders The Transition to Adulthood Alliance (T2A), a coalition of the 12 leading voluntary sector organisations 1 working in the criminal justice, health and youth sectors, welcomes the opportunity to respond to this consultation. Over the past eight years, T2A has built up a substantial body of evidence about what works in relation to young adult offenders, and welcomes the opportunity to respond to this consultation. The Alliance would particularly like to draw your attention to the T2A publication Pathways from Crime, which sets out ways in which the criminal justice service could, within current legislation, improve outcomes for young adult offenders. T2A commented extensively in your recent consultation on probation services on the need for the criminal justice system to address the distinct needs of young adults, if their offending behaviour is to be addressed effectively. There arguments are not repeated here, but T2A s response to your previous consultation, which should be read in conjunction with this letter, can be found at http://www.t2a.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/probation-consultation- Response-June-2012.pdf. The Alliance believes that this review presents an opportunity to focus on achieving better outcomes for the young adult offender group and on commissioning what works, rather than more of the same. In this submission, we respond to questions 17 & 18 (together) and to the new issues this second consultation gives rise to. 1. Summary of our response By reforming approaches across the criminal justice system to reflect the developing maturity of young adults, and mitigating the impact of the multiple service transitions encountered during this period, a significant impact would be felt in reducing levels of reoffending, overall spend and, importantly, the numbers of victims of crime. There is a strong emerging body of evidence about new approaches to working with young adults that are more effective in supporting desistance and reducing reoffending than is standard current practice. The approach piloted by T2A (outlined in more detail below) of voluntary services working alongside statutory ones could offer a blueprint for the future. T2A welcomes the proposal to provide thorough the gate services for short sentenced prisoners but cautions against making these compulsory. The evidence from our pilots is that providing additional voluntary support is a very effective way of reducing offending, whereas adding additional compulsory elements is likely to increase numbers of avoidable breaches, particularly in the young adult group. A related point is that by it may lead to an up-tariffing of sentences.. MoJ proposes that low and medium risk individuals should be managed differently from high risk offenders. We note that there are difficulties in assigning risk levels to 1 Convened by the Barrow Cadbury Trust (BCT) since 2008, its membership encompasses Addaction, Catch22, the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, Clinks, the Criminal Justice Alliance, the Howard League for Penal Reform, Nacro, the Prince s Trust, the Prison Reform Trust, the Revolving Doors Agency, the Young Foundation, and Young Minds. Although the work of the T2A Alliance reflects the views of its membership, this submission should not be seen to represent the policy positions of individual member organisations. 1

young adults, and that it is very probable that the risk levels of young adults will fluctuate over the course of their sentence. There is an accumulation of evidence, from many sources, that good relationships are key to success with the young adult age group, so arrangements must be put in place to ensure that there is continuity over the course of a supervision order. We argue that it is vital that voluntary and community organisations, many of which have extensive and distinct experience of working with younger offenders, are included in both the design and delivery of services. 2. Why focus on young adults as a distinct group? Young adults (those aged 18-24) are greatly over-represented in the criminal justice system. They are also a group that are the most likely to desist and grow out of crime. The right intervention can speed up this process; the wrong one can slow desistance and extend the period that a young adult is involved in the criminal justice system. There is a strong emerging body of evidence about new approaches to working with young adults that are more effective than standard current practice. Over the past four years, T2A pilot projects have been testing a distinct approach to working with young adults in three areas (Birmingham, West Mercia and London), putting additional support provided by VCS organisations alongside statutory interventions. The voluntary element consists of services and interventions that support young people to mature, to develop responsibility, temperance and perspective. These run alongside statutory orders and this dual approach has proved highly effective in increasing the likelihood of desistance. A particular feature of the Birmingham pilot, which was run by Staffordshire and West Midlands Probation Service, was a focus on transition between youth and adult services. The recent review of transitions carried out by the Youth Justice Board drew heavily on this approach. The smooth management of transitions between services is essential for effective rehabilitation and management of young offenders. An outcomes evaluation of the pilot projects found that reconviction rates of young adults involved in the projects was 9 per cent. This compares to a national reconviction rate for 18-20 year olds of 46 per cent 2 (rising to 58 per cent 3 for young adults leaving custody). The pilots were cost effective: a break even analysis carried out by Matrix Evidence showed that the services would have to reduce offending by only 28 per cent over two years to break even 4. The promising results of the T2A pilots demonstrate that having voluntary organisations and statutory services working in partnership can be a highly effective way of reducing reoffending. There are many organisations in the voluntary sector that understand and have expertise with working with young adults, including those in custody and those that pose a higher risk to the community. It is therefore important that in the new landscape, voluntary sector organisations are included in both the design and delivery of services and that commissioners, and prime contractors, use the emerging evidence base to shape their service planning. 3. Young adults on short sentences We welcome the government s decision to increase support on release from prison for those serving short sentences. This is something that T2A has argued for in previous submissions. 2 MOJ reoffending bulletin 2011 3 248 Hansard HC, 17 January 2011, c653w 4 http://www.t2a.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/t2a-summative-evaluation-catch22-2012.pdf 2

However the Alliance would caution against making through the gate mentoring compulsory. The essence of mentoring is of a relationship freely entered into by both parties. This is backed up by the experience of the T2A pilots which found that the key advantage they provide in working with this age group is the time and flexibility of T2A workers, the fact that they do not have to enforce sentences and that the participation of the clients is voluntary 5. Our experience was that when young people were given the opportunity to engage with rehabilitative services, the majority chose to take up the support offered. Therefore whilst we understand the Ministry of Justice s aim to ensure every offender receives additional support, we do not believe that sanctions will be needed for non-compliance to achieve the outcomes sought. The additional compulsory requirement being proposed around mentoring we believe has the potential to increase the rate of breach amongst this cohort. As stated in more detail in our previous submission, young adults are amongst the most likely group to breach their sentence given their developing maturity and often multiple needs. We would like to take this opportunity to further highlight the success that the T2A pilots had in reducing breach rates through providing age-appropriate support. If this can be replicated across the country, it has the potential to release substantial cash savings. Lastly, compulsion has the potential to up tariff sentences to prison. The Alliance has argued in its report Pathways from Crime that every effort should be made to keep nonviolent young adults (whether on remand or sentenced) out of custody, and enable the courts to issue an intensive community sentence. We would advocate that this review is used as an opportunity to look again at the sentencing options, including robust community alternatives to prison, that are tailored specifically to young adults. The few existing examples of young adult specific community interventions that exist across the country should be replicated nationally, and similar effective interventions should be available to all sentencers when sentencing a young adult. More should be done to develop the scope of the Attendance Centre requirement, as well as tailoring other available community sentence options to the specific needs of this stage of life. T2A would welcome the opportunity to discuss this in greater detail or to convene meetings with members of the Alliance with particular experience, which might be helpful in informing the design of new sentencing options for young adults. 4. Young adult risk profiles In relation to contracting out work with medium to low risk offenders, we note that assigning risk level to a young adult cohort is challenging. Given their age, many young adults will not have amassed an offending profile that lends itself to being so easily interpreted for this purpose. Additionally, it is likely that risk profile of offenders will be subject to change during the course of their sentence. This is particularly likely to be true of young offenders given their developing maturity. T2A would like to see resources and support put into this age group based on their level of need, not just their level of risk. 5. Personal and professional relationships are key to change A key finding running through research by T2A (and many others) is the prime importance to desistance of the quality of the relationship between an offender and the person providing them with support. The formative evaluation of the T2A pilots summed up the combination of statutory and voluntary services together forming the provision of a local inter-agency 5 http://www.t2a.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/t2a-summative-evaluation-catch22-2012.pdf 3

system for guiding young adults into better lives. 6 The researchers identified seven key precepts of the T2A approach which they felt were key to success of working with this age group: Formation of a working alliance based on mutual respect and agreed goals, which increases self-worth of service users and motivates them to remain engaged; Use of strengths-based principals emphasising what a service user can achieve, rather than focussing on weakness or mistakes; An action plan determined by the client, encouraging cooperation because what is required of them is what they want anyway, respecting and promoting the agency of the service user in making changes; The development of a respectful, empathetic relationship so there is a readiness to work together; A client-led model of work, giving the service user a taste for being in control and thereby building up self-efficacy; Connecting service users to material resources and opportunities, promoting changes in self-concept and identity; Through referring and connecting the service users to the material resources and social opportunities they need to get on in life, increasing their sense of selfefficacy. This person-centred approach was one of the main differences identified by the evaluators between the traditional approach of the Probation Service and the support provided by thet2a teams. It allowed the T2A pilots to support service users to feel safe and able to cope through building up confidence, skills and support networks. It was made clear in the summative evaluation 7 of the T2A pilots that, for many of the young people involved in the pilots, the T2A workers provided critical support on what was a complex journey and, without that support, outcomes were likely to have been very different. We strongly urge MoJ to take account when designing services of this need for empathetic, consistent relationships between young adult offenders and those supporting them. The evidence from our work is that providing such support is critical to success with this age group. 6. Payment by results The Alliance welcomes the move away from binary measures of reoffending as a measure of success. We believe that reductions in the frequency and severity of offence are better and more realistic indications of success with this age group (and indeed all offenders). Young adult offenders frequently have complex lifestyles and/or multiple needs, and desistance is a process that takes place over time. It is unrealistic to expect immediate complete cessation of offending. Instead, a positive trajectory would, for many, include a slowing down or reduction in severity in offending on the way to total desistance. Measuring distance travelled is a more favourable approach, as is focusing on those factors support desistance such as the achievement of stable accommodation, improving relationships/interpersonal skills, meaningful occupation and reduction in drug and alcohol use. If you would like to discuss the contents of this submission further, please contact Sarah Thomas, Public Affairs Manager, on 020 7336 4818 or by emailing sarah.thomas@catch- 22.org.uk From: Debbie Pippard Vice-Chair, Transition to Adulthood Alliance 6 Burnett et al, 2010, http://www.t2a.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/oxford-cfc-final-evaluation-report-2011.pdf 7 http://www.t2a.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/t2a-summative-evaluation-catch22-2012.pdf 4

c/o Barrow Cadbury Trust d.pippard@barrowcadbury.org.uk 020 7632 9060 5