RESOURCES. What is provided in this packet? TTB Individual School. Lookup Tools. Worksheet. Worksheet



Similar documents
Top-to-Bottom Ranking, Priority, Focus and Rewards Schools Identification Business Rules. Overview

Top-to-Bottom Ranking, Priority, Focus and Reward Schools Identification Business Rules. Overview

Approval of Revised Michigan School Accreditation and Accountability System (MI-SAAS)

WEST OTTAWA PUBLIC SCHOOLS

School Ranking Business Rules. Short Narrative Version

Frequently Asked Questions Contact us:

How To Improve Your School

Allen Elementary School

P-20 in Action Michigan s Focus on Career and College Ready Students: Student Success through Collaborative Efforts Pk-20

State Transition to High-Quality, College/Career-Ready Assessments: A Workbook for State Action on Key Policy, Legal, and Technical Issues

FEDERAL ROLE IN EDUCATION

JUST THE FACTS. Memphis, Tennessee

Manage Compliance with External Requirements

New York State Comprehensive Course Catalog Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) updated 4/15/2014

School Levels of Support. By Dr. Kristine Harms

Frequently Asked Questions: Performance Management Framework

School Performance Framework: Technical Guide

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Spring 2015 ELA and Math Assessment Results

Texas Education Agency Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools State

Introduction: Online school report cards are not new in North Carolina. The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI) has been

Early Childhood Education Draft Board Resolution

Wappingers Central School District

CPM High Schools California Standards Test (CST) Results for

ANNUAL REPORT ON CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION AND STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT

Understanding Ohio s New Local Report Card System

JUST THE FACTS. Washington

From Cradle ToCareer Connecting American Education From Birth Through Adulthood

college & CAREER READY DIPLOMA AUTHORIZED

Fulda Independent School District 505

JUST THE FACTS. Phoenix, Arizona

ARMT Longitudinal Data Analysis

Interpreting Reports from the Iowa Assessments

SREB State College and Career Readiness Initiative

Procedures and Guidelines New Hampshire s Highly Qualified Teacher Requirements No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) 2001

Texas Education Agency Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools

PROGRESS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CAREER AND COLLEGE READY GRADUATES PROGRAM

Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds

Chapter 10 Federal Accountability

Illinois State Board of Education. Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts

Successful RtI Selection and Implementation Practices

SCHOLASTIC READING INVENTORY (SRI) - Testing Window: Aug. 28 th Sept. 28 th, 2012

Top Bay Area Public Schools for Underserved Students

Standard 1: Planning and Evaluation of a Data- Driven Counseling Program

ASSESSMENT DIRECTIONS: Please use the data sets provided below to complete Steps 1-3 of the worksheet. Day 3 Assessment

Chapter 3 The College- and Career-Readiness Component of the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) End-of-Course (EOC) Program

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

RENEWING CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION IN COLORADO

A Holistic Approach Elizabeth H. Stanley

Best Practices in School Budgeting

Migrant Education Program Evaluation Toolkit A Tool for State Migrant Directors. Summer 2012

District Accountability Handbook Version 3.0 September 2012

Career and Professional Education: Preparing Florida s Students for the Knowledge Economy Florida Master Plan for K-20 Education

Partners in. Preparation. A Survey

Teacher Education and PreK 18 Collaboration: Assessing Impact on Student Achievement

District: LITTLESTOWN AREA SD AUN: Test Date: PSSA Spring English Language Arts. Mathematics Science

ACCOUNTING 1, 2, 3, 4. 4 semesters

JUST THE FACTS. Birmingham, Alabama

Hiawatha Academies School District #4170

Middle Grades Action Kit How To Use the Survey Tools!

State of New Jersey

FINAL REPORT ON PROGRAM OF STUDY ACCOUNTING PROJECT GRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE. Mary Barnum, Jeff Spoelman, Rick Barnhart JUNE 30, 2009

Teacher Performance Evaluation System

For Immediate Release: Thursday, July 19, 2012 Contact: Jim Polites

Blueprint Schools Network

Evaluation of the MIND Research Institute s Spatial-Temporal Math (ST Math) Program in California

Transcription:

RESOURCES accountability system used by Michigan educators in response to the accountability, and ensure that all students are on track to graduate career- and college-ready. TTB Individual School Lookup Tools Worksheet What is provided in this packet? This packet includes tools to assist educators: TTB Individual School Lookup Tool on how to use the lookup tool performance data a template to use to compile performance data and highlight areas for improvement Worksheet a template to use to communicate performance data resources are available at Reward Schools highest preforming, greatest progress and Focus Schools schools with the largest achievement gaps Priority Schools lowest performing schools The information and resources provided here are intended to support educators in their continued efforts to improve student learning. 2013 2014

Using the 2013 2014 TTB Individual School Lookup Tool 1. Open the 2013 14 TTB Individual School Lookup Tool 2. The TTB Individual School Lookup Tool includes four Excel Worksheets: similar to those seen here School Lookup the tool used to acquire the TTB data Data the raw data used to compute the TTB data TTB Individual School Lookup guide educators through the process of acquiring the Top-toinstructions align with the TTB Workbook. 3. 4. Look in the Search Results box for the correct School Name and School Code. 5. Type the School Code in the white box and press Enter. Reward, Focus, Priority or no if there 6. Worksheet). This is how the school 7. Note the II on the compares in rank to other schools across the state. Remember, it is NOT a percentage of performance, but a Rank of 68 Michigan s schools. 68% of 8. Note the overall z-score for each subject area: math, reading, 9. Note the z-score, the z-score and the z-score for each subject area: math, reading, Worksheet) 1:1

One 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Z-Score Examples Your school has a z-score of -2.0. You are very far below state average. State Average 9. Z-score of -2.0 Z-score of 0.2 Z-score of 1.5 Worse than state average Better than state average -3-2 -1 0 1 2 3 A z-score of near 0 denotes performance that is near the state average; a z-score that is less than -.5 denotes performance that is below the state average; a z-score that is greater than.5 denotes performance that is above the state average. 1:2

Using the 2013 2014 TTB Priority Focus Reward None TTB Worksheet to support educators in their work to use statewide achievement data to improve student learning. Please use this worksheet to guide your II. OVERALL RANK (0 99) Please note your schools overall rank below Rank = III. ANALYSIS BY SUBJECT result is below, at, or above average and check the corresponding box. Below Average Z < or 0.5 Near Average Z 0 Above Average Z > or 0.5 Math Reading Science Social Studies 2:1

IV. PLAN FOR IMPROVEMENT Given the analyses from above, in which subject areas need to be addressed based on which core issues? In addition, what thoughts or ideas do you have about why the students performed as they did? Two Subject Area Core Issues:,, Thoughts/Ideas About Student Performance What additional data do you need in order to follow up? What are your next steps? 2:2

Writing a sample communication based on the TTB Diagnostic Worksheet Section Three TTB Communication Template This communication template is meant to support educators in their work to communicate achievement and accountability data to their stakeholders. Please use this template to guide your efforts. There are several ways to communicate the results of the Top-to- Bottom Ranking; the strategy and vehicle may vary depending on the audience. Following are a number of key messages to include in your communications. 1. Overview of Top-to-Bottom a. U. S. Department of Education and Elementary and Secondary Education Act (NCLB) b. Purpose of Top-to-Bottom c. Components of Top-to-Bottom i. Ranking ii. Designation iii.,, 2. Your school s data a. Designation (Section I on the TTB Diagnostic Worksheet) b. Rank (Section II on the TTB Diagnostic Worksheet) c. Strengths or above average areas by subject or metric (Section III on the TTB Diagnostic Worksheet) d. Areas of (Section III on the TTB Diagnostic Worksheet) 3. Next steps or plans for improvement (Section IV on the TTB Diagnostic Worksheet) A sample letter that can be used as a model for your communications is shown on the following page. It can be customized to include data and information from your school. 3:1

School or District Official <Date> Three Dear <Recipient>: Recently, the Michigan Department of Education released school and district accountability results that include the Top-to-Bottom (TTB) school ranking list. The Top-to-Bottom ranking is a new way of looking at Michigan s school performance. Nearly all K-12 public schools are ranked based on student proficiency, student improvement, and achievement gaps between students within a school. A school with a high ranking is one that has a high level of proficiency, is improving over time, and is ensuring that all students are learning and achieving at a high level. This ranking helps provide important information to all schools regarding their performance and how it compares to other schools across the state. It s also important to note that in the national and statewide discussion about school performance, the focus has shifted from identifying schools who fail to meet a set of criteria to identifying the schools that are persistently low performing, in order to target resources and interventions more specifically to those schools most in need of assistance. <School Name> has a school ranking of <school percentile>. This means that <School Name> ranked higher than <percent> of schools across the state on the Top-to-Bottom list. Subject areas that are included in this ranking for our school include mathematics, reading, and (social studies, science, writing include as appropriate) (If your school has a graduation rate include that as well) Several specific results include: Area of Success. (Describe an area of strength; either an achievement level, improvement rate, or gap size for a particular subject area) <Priority, focus or Reward label, if appropriate> (Include one of the following descriptive paragraphs) Priority: <school name> has been labeled as a Priority School. Schools that are in the lowest 5 percent in the Top-to-Bottom list are called Priority schools and need to implement an intervention model that is designed to improve student achievement and decrease achievement gaps. Focus: <school name> has been labeled as a Focus School. Schools with the largest achievement gap are called Focus schools and need to dig deep into diagnostic data, facilitate professional dialogue and customize interventions to meet the needs of all students. Reward: <school name> has been labeled as a Reward School. Schools in the top 5% of the TTB ranking, in the top 5% in the improvement measure or identified as a Beating the Odds School. <school name> is a Reward school because of <identify reason from previous list> Area in need of improvement. (Describe an area in need of improvement; either an achievement level, improvement rate, or gap size for a particular subject area) In order to address this area that needs improvement, <explain what the school is doing to address the problem and how the district is helping>. You can assist our efforts by <explain how parents can be involved in addressing the issues that caused the school to be identified>. We anticipate that these initiatives will result in increased student achievement. Sincerely, 3:2

E-mail: MDE-Accountability@michigan.gov