FEDERAL ROLE IN EDUCATION
|
|
- Scot Marshall Stanley
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 FEDERAL ROLE IN EDUCATION KEY ISSUES The majority of decisions on public education are made at the state and local levels, but the federal government does contribute resources to North Carolina s public school system. Although it fluctuates year-to-year, about 11% of North Carolina s education comes from the federal government in the form of program support and recurring or one-time grants. North Carolina was a recipient of the federal government s Race to the Top state grants. As the Race to the Top funding comes to an end, North Carolina must decide how to continue the programs and initiatives implemented through Race to the Top. OVERVIEW In the United States, it is the responsibility of states and communities to establish schools, develop standards and curricula, set graduation requirements, and determine the logistics of school governance. While education policy is mostly determined by state and local administrative units, the federal government plays an important role in funding, overseeing, and developing education policies. The federal government currently provides about 14% of the funding to schools in North Carolina in the forms of grants and recurring support. 1 This percentage is larger than usual due to North Carolina s current Race to the Top grant. Much of that funding is channeled through the US Department of Education, but portions of it come through the Department of Health and Human Services (Head Start Program) or the Department of Agriculture (School Lunch Program). Generally speaking, these funds are targeted to areas of highest need. Allocating federal funding in a targeted way has allowed the U.S. Department of Education to become an emergency response system, to fill in funding gaps between state and local support in areas of highest need. The role of the federal government in education is minimal when compared to the state and local roles, but the federal government does play an important role in guiding and overseeing education on a national scale. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION The U.S. Department of Education was created in 1867 and became a Cabinet level agency in The Department s mission is to promote student achievement by ensuring equal access and developing efficient school systems. The chief tasks of the U.S. Department of Education include: Establishing, allocating, and monitoring federal inancial aid programs for education. Collecting data on schools nationwide. Focusing national attention on key educational issues. Prohibiting discrimination and ensuring equal access to education. FEDERAL PROGRAM MONITORING AND SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION The NC Department of Public Instruction (NC DPI) houses the Federal Program Monitoring and Support Services Division, which provides oversight of state and local programs to ensure compliance with federal regulations and to guard against waste, fraud, and abuse. The division oversees federal programs such as Title I (discussed in more detail below), Title IV, the Rural Education Achievement Program, and Homeless Educa Local School Finance Study, Public School Forum 1
2 tion. This division monitors the allocation of federal funds to ensure that such funds contribute to student achievement and progress. The Division is subdivided into two sections: the Program Monitoring Section, which works to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to access a high-quality education; and the Support Service Division, which aids LEAs in preventing violence and illegal substance abuse at schools to ensure a safe and healthy learning environment for students. RACE TO THE TOP DEFINITION North Carolina was one of 12 states selected to receive the 2010 federal Race to the Top (RttT) grant. This grant brought nearly $400 million to the state s public school system for use over a four-year period. The grant was designed to spur public school innovation, and was awarded to states with promising plans and concrete goals toward school improvement. The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI) created the Race to the Top Project Management Office (PMO) to manage Race to the Top implementation. The PMO facilitates and monitors local implementation, as well as implementation of the state-led Race to the Top initiatives. North Carolina has used the Race to the Top funding to remodel the state system through the READY initiative, an ambitious plan to increase student achievement, close achievement gaps and continue to increase the number of career- and college- ready graduates by making sure every student has an excellent teacher. The READY plan is built on the following two principles: 1. All students should be held to high academic expectations, allowing them to graduate fully prepared for college or a career. 2. Effective teachers and principals are necessary for facilitating the academic growth and development of students. ACCOMPLISHMENTS In the third year of Race to the Top s implementation, North Carolina showed progress in the following areas: Building local capacity for implementation of the Standard Course of Study through webinars, regional trainings, online modules, and collaborative resources. Effective collection of data assessing educator effectiveness in NC public schools. Continued development of technological resources to support NC s Race to the Top grant. Improvements in student achievement and graduation rates in NC s lowest performing schools. CHALLENGES Despite such dynamic progress in North Carolina s education system as a result of the Race to the Top grant, a number of challenges still require further resources and attention. Delays hindered the technological development of NC s main initiatives like icloud and HomeBase across the state. NC Final Exam administration was disrupted by local in lexibility, printing problems, and other logistical issues. 2
3 As Race to the Top funding comes to an end, North Carolina must decide how resources will be allocated to continue newly developed programs to sustain successes. The following State Race to the Top measures and target outcomes were set through the and school years. The goals were then revised in December of The school year is the first in which the Common Core standards and assessments were implemented, which, as anticipated, will require the goals to be adjusted to ensure ambitiousness and feasibility. State RttT Goal Measure Baseline Targets Student Achievement % of All Students Proficient - Grade 4 Reading 71.6% 74.6% 77.6% 80.6%* 83.6%* * In the school year, new (State End of Grade test; a proxy for NAEP Grade 4 Reading) assessments aligned to new standards (including the Common Core) will be implemented in NC. This introduction of new % of All Students Proficient - Grade 4 Math 83.0% 85.0% 87.0% 89%* 91.0%* assessments may require the adjustment of these targets to ensure ambitiousness and (State End of Grade test; a proxy for NAEP Grade 4 Math) feasibility. % of All Students Proficient - Grade 8 Reading 69.5% 72.5% 75.5% 78.5%* 81.5%* (State End of Grade test; a proxy for NAEP Grade 8 Reading) % of All Students Proficient - Grade 8 Math 83.9% 86.9% 89.9% 92.9%* 95.9%* (State End of Grade test; a proxy for NAEP Grade 8 Math) 2. Graduation Rates** 4-Year Cohort Rate 74.2% 76% 79% 82% 85% ** Targets for this measure have been updated since the initial RttT application to reflect actual, rather than projected, baseline data; the targets are now more ambitious. 3. College Readiness Average SAT Composite in Reading & Math (% students taking)*** 1,004 (64%) 1,005 (66%) Average ACT Composite*** Language for these three goals has been modified or added since the initial RttT application to more clearly identify the specific indicator/data being referenced and/or to reflect policy updates. Legislation passed in 2011 requires the administration of the ACT statewide, which impacts the representativness of the SAT as a college readiness measure. The State will request the ACT be included as a measure for college readiness and will establish targets in the fall of (% students taking)*** 4. College Enrollment % of AP exams taken on which students scored 3 or above (% of students taking AP exams)*** 57.6% (10.4%) 60% (11%) 62% (13%) 64% (15%) 66% (17%) % of high school graduates who enroll in post-secondary education programs **** 66.0% 67% 68% 70% 72% TITLE I: IMPROVING THE ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT OF THE DISADVANTAGED The Title I program provides financial assistance through State Educational Agencies (SEAs) to local educational agencies and public schools with high percentages of economically disadvantaged children to help ensure that all children meet challenging state academic content and student academic achievement standards. 3
4 Schools enrolling at least 40% of students from economically disadvantaged families are eligible to use Title I funds for school programs. Title I funding reaches about 12.5 million students in both public and private schools nationally. Sixty-five percent of the Title I funding serves students in grades 1 through 6; twelve percent in preschool and kindergarten; and the remaining twenty-three percent goes to middle and high school students. 2 Under the current Elementary and Secondary Act Title I School Designations, Title I schools are categorized as: Focus Schools an elementary or middle school that is contributing to the achievement gap in the state or a high school with a graduation rate less than 60 percent over a number of years that is not identi ied as a priority school. The total number of Focus Schools must equal at least 10 percent of the Title I schools in the state (130 schools in North Carolina). Priority Schools a school that has been identi ied as among the lowest-performing schools in the state. The total number of priority schools must be at least 5 percent of the total number of Title I schools in the state (77 in North Carolina). Reward Schools a school that is a highest-performing school (all student groups make AYP) and does not have signi icant achievement gaps across subgroups; or a high progress school which is a Title I school among the 10 percent of Title I schools in the state that are making the most progress in improving the performance of all students over a number of years and exhibit no signi icant achievement gaps across student subgroups. There are 120 Reward Schools in North Carolina. Focus and Priority Schools are required to take actions to improve educational services for students. Local school districts will have discretion to decide how to intervene in Focus Schools. Priority Schools will receive more prescriptive interventions to improve performance. Schools remain on the Focus or Priority lists for three years, and a new list of Focus and Priority Schools will be developed in Reward Schools will be identified annually. Reward Schools are eligible for public recognition and to apply for additional earmarked Title I funds. NATIONAL TITLE I DISTINGUISHED SCHOOLS PROGRAM The National Title I Distinguished Schools program recognizes exemplary Title I schools that hold students to high standards and demonstrate exemplary school effectiveness in: teaching and learning based on the approved state curriculum, use of research-based instructional strategies, opportunities provided for all students to achieve, established partnerships with parents, families, and the community, implementation of sustained research-based professional development, and innovation and modeling for other schools. Distinguished schools fall into two categories: Sustained Achievement schools or Closing the Achievement Gap schools. Sustained Achievement schools record at least 80% of students are proficient in math and reading and have achieved AYP for at least two years. Schools in the Closing the Achievement Gap category exemplify progress in closing gaps between different subgroups of students. Schools in both categories are recognized at a National Title I Conference. 2 NC DPI Title I 4
5 HISTORICAL FEDERAL LEGISLATION ELEMENTARY & SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1965 as part of the War on Poverty program. ESEA has been the most far-reaching federal legislation affecting education passed at the national level. The bill aims to narrow the achievement gaps between students by allocating funding for primary and secondary education, emphasizing equal access to education, and establishing high standards and accountability. The act was originally authorized through 1965; however, the government has reauthorized the act every five years since its enactment until The current reauthorization of ESEA is the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, named and proposed by President George W. Bush. Below are the main provisions of the original ESEA and a few of the earliest additions to the act. Title I Financial Assistance To Local Educational Agencies For The Education Of Children Of Low- Income Families Title II School Library Resources, Textbooks, and other Instructional Materials Title III Supplementary Educational Centers and Services Title IV Educational Research And Training Title V Grants To Strengthen State Departments Of Education Title VI General Provisions New Titles Created by Early Amendments to 1965 Law 1966 amendments (Public Law ) Title VI - Aid to Handicapped Children (1965 title VI becomes Title VII) 1967 amendments (Public Law ) Title VII - Bilingual Education Programs (1966 title VII becomes Title VIII NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND MAJOR POLICY PROVISIONS OF NCLB On January 8, 2002, President George W. Bush signed the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 into law, which reauthorized the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). The major focus of the legislation was to raise academic standards for all students and to hold states accountable for student performance. NCLB was based on four principles of President George W. Bush's education reform plan: 1. Stronger accountability for results. 2. Expanded lexibility and local control. 3. Expanded options for parents. 4. Emphasis on teaching methods that have been proven to work. NCLB mandated that by , states must annually test students in grades 3-8 in reading and mathematics and by , students must be tested once in elementary, middle, and high school in science. States were also required to participate in the 4 th and 8 th grade reading and mathematics National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) tests, also called the Nation s Report Card, to provide a common measure of comparison across states. The law required that all students must be proficient on state assessments by Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) has been used to determine school proficiency. To make AYP, each subgroup of students within a school and the school as a whole must have 95% participation in state exams and must meet state-set proficiency targets. 5
6 FLEXIBILITY AND NCLB WAIVERS In May 2012, North Carolina was granted flexibility waivers from many of the NCLB provisions. Waivers granted by the U.S. Department of Education make significant changes to North Carolina s implementation of ESEA s requirements especially in the areas of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), parent notifications, public school choice and Supplemental Educational Services. This flexibility allows North Carolina s public school system to move forward with strengthened College- and Career-Ready expectations for all students, new ways to hold Title I schools accountable for students' academic proficiency, and new initiatives to support effective instruction and leadership. Many of the former strict federal requirements regarding AYP and sanctions for schools that do not make AYP are no longer required statewide and are now for local school districts to address. With the new waiver, schools will still be measured against Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) calculated and reported under NCLB, but they are more flexible than AYP. AMOs include more specific achievement targets for each student subgroup, guarantee that at least 95 percent of students participate in testing, establish high school graduation rate targets for each student subgroup, and attendance rate targets for K-8 students. 6
Frequently Asked Questions Contact us: RAC@doe.state.nj.us
Frequently Asked Questions Contact us: RAC@doe.state.nj.us 1 P a g e Contents Identification of a Priority, Focus, or Reward School... 4 Is a list of all Priority, Focus, and Reward Schools available to
More informationJUST THE FACTS. Missouri
JUST THE FACTS Missouri The Institute for a Competitive Workforce (ICW) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, 501(c)(3) affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. ICW promotes the rigorous educational standards
More informationState Legislated reforms for 2014 - Principle 4
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: AN OVERVIEW September 26, 2011 INTRODUCTION STATES LEADING REFORM States and districts have initiated groundbreaking reforms and innovations to increase the quality of instruction and
More informationAccountability and Virginia Public Schools
Accountability and Virginia Public Schools 2008-2009 School Year irginia s accountability system supports teaching and learning by setting rigorous academic standards, known as the Standards of Learning
More informationAre ALL children receiving a high-quality education in Ardmore, Oklahoma? Not yet.
Are ALL children receiving a high-quality education in Ardmore, Oklahoma? Not yet. Despite a relatively high graduation rate, too many students are not graduating from Ardmore Public Schools ready for
More informationM D R w w w. s c h o o l d a t a. c o m 8 0 0-3 3 3-8 8 0 2
MDR s Guide to Federally Funded Education Programs Major federal programs in the Education Budget for Fiscal Year 2011 are listed below. Twenty-three programs were eliminated from the FY2011 budget, including
More informationDistrict Accountability Handbook Version 3.0 September 2012
District Accountability Handbook Version 3.0 September 2012 Colorado Department of Education Page 1 The purpose of this handbook is to provide an outline of the requirements and responsibilities for state,
More informationJUST THE FACTS. Memphis, Tennessee
JUST THE FACTS Memphis, Tennessee The Institute for a Competitive Workforce (ICW) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, 501(c)(3) affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. ICW promotes the rigorous educational
More informationJUST THE FACTS. New Mexico
JUST THE FACTS New Mexico The Institute for a Competitive Workforce (ICW) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, 501(c)(3) affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. ICW promotes the rigorous educational standards
More informationJUST THE FACTS. Birmingham, Alabama
JUST THE FACTS Birmingham, Alabama The Institute for a Competitive Workforce (ICW) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, 501(c)(3) affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. ICW promotes the rigorous educational
More informationJUST THE FACTS. Florida
JUST THE FACTS Florida The Institute for a Competitive Workforce (ICW) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, 501(c)(3) affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. ICW promotes the rigorous educational standards
More informationChapter 10 Federal Accountability
Chapter 10 Federal Accountability Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) and No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was first passed by Congress in 1965 as
More informationJUST THE FACTS. Washington
JUST THE FACTS Washington The Institute for a Competitive Workforce (ICW) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, 501(c)(3) affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. ICW promotes the rigorous educational standards
More informationFY 2013 Budget Request
FY 2013 Budget Request DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Education for the Disadvantaged Program FY 2012 Administration FY 2013 Request Difference Title I, Part A (ESEA) $14,516,457,000 $14,516,457,000 $0 School
More informationEvery Student Succeeds Act
Every Student Succeeds Act A New Day in Public Education Frequently Asked Questions STANDARDS, ASSESSMENTS AND ACCOUNTABILITY Q: What does ESSA mean for a classroom teacher? A: ESSA will end the obsession
More informationJUST THE FACTS. Phoenix, Arizona
JUST THE FACTS Phoenix, Arizona The Institute for a Competitive Workforce (ICW) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, 501(c)(3) affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. ICW promotes the rigorous educational standards
More informationSummary of Significant Spending and Fiscal Rules in the Every Student Succeeds Act
Summary of Significant Spending and Fiscal Rules in the Every Student Succeeds Act The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), which was signed into law on December 10, 2015, makes important changes to the
More informationSCHOOL PROGRESS INDEX Data Release
1 SCHOOL PROGRESS INDEX Data Release Office of Achievement and Accountability BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS What is the School Progress Index? 2 The School Progress Index (SPI) is the measure Maryland
More information2012-2013. Annual Report on Curriculum Instruction and Student. Achievement
2012-2013 Annual Report on Curriculum Instruction and Student Achievement 2012-2013 A MESSAGE FROM SUPERINTENDENT PACE Our 2012-2013 Annual Report on Curriculum, Instruction and Student Achievement is
More informationADE - State/Federal Reporting Overview
ADE - State/Federal Reporting Overview An overview of the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) State and Federal Reporting efforts using the Statewide Information System (SIS) data as the authoritative
More informationSUMMARY OF AND PROBLEMS WITH REPUBLICAN BILL
SUMMARY OF AND PROBLEMS WITH REPUBLICAN BILL The Student Success Act (H.R. 5): H.R. 5 makes significant changes to Title I (Improving Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged). It also moves current law
More informationIf you asked 100 directors of special education why special
01-Book 2-4908.qxd 2/10/2006 7:37 PM Page 9 1 Which Laws Affecting Special Education Should Every Teacher Know? If you asked 100 directors of special education why special education services exist in their
More informationPlanning a NCLB Title VA Program ODE April 2007
This document is a companion piece to the Planning a NCLB Title VA Program power point. The NCLB Title VA text and USDE Guidance referencing the items in the power point are listed by page number with
More information2015-2016 SCHOOL YEAR
2015-2016 SCHOOL YEAR Virginia s accountability system supports teaching and learning by setting rigorous academic standards known as the Standards of Learning (SOL) and through annual assessments of student
More informationGwinnett County Public Schools, Ga.
, Ga. District Profile*: Rank among U.S. school districts (by size): 14 Number of schools: 123 Number of students: 159,298 Number of teachers: 11,000 Per pupil expenditures**: $8,859 Superintendent: J.
More informationIntroduction: Online school report cards are not new in North Carolina. The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI) has been
Introduction: Online school report cards are not new in North Carolina. The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI) has been reporting ABCs results since 1996-97. In 2001, the state General
More informationANNUAL REPORT ON CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION AND STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
The mission of the Greenbush-Middle River School is to provide a quality education which will prepare all students to meet success by developing self-directed thinkers and communicators who are responsible,
More informationAdopted March 2010 ESEA REAUTHORIZATION PRINCIPLES AND RECOMMENDATIONS. A Policy Statement of the Council of Chief State School Officers
Adopted March 2010 ESEA REAUTHORIZATION PRINCIPLES AND RECOMMENDATIONS A Policy Statement of the Council of Chief State School Officers INTRODUCTION This policy statement presents a vision for a new deal
More informationUnderstanding Ohio s New Local Report Card System
Achievement Performance Indicators Performance Index The Performance Indicators show how many students have a minimum, or proficient, level of knowledge. These indicators are not new to Ohio students or
More informationState of Colorado K-12 Mandate
State of Colorado K-12 Mandate Below is a partial list of state and federal mandates for school districts in Colorado: Minimum Number of Days of Instruction Every child who has attained the age of six
More informationSTUDENT ASSESSMENT AND SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY IN UTAH
Education Policy Brief August 2012 STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY IN UTAH Utah Legislature Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel HIGHLIGHTS The purpose of the Utah Performance
More informationState Transition to High-Quality, College/Career-Ready Assessments: A Workbook for State Action on Key Policy, Legal, and Technical Issues
State Transition to High-Quality, College/Career-Ready Assessments: A Workbook for State Action on Key Policy, Legal, and Technical Issues Updated as of November 14, 2013 Page 1 Table of Contents Part
More informationHigh School Graduation and the No Child Left Behind Act
Connecticut The Policy Context High School Graduation and the No Child Left Behind Act The federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), enacted in 2002, holds states and the schools under their jurisdictions
More informationDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION Federal Funds Total: Outlays. Budget Authority... Outlays.,,,, 0,, ACCELERATING ACHIEVEMENT AND ENSURING EQUITY Note. A full-year 0
More informationData Housed at the North Carolina Education Research Data Center
Data Housed at the North Carolina Education Research Data Center District-level data Community Index Data, Year 2004 Each file has one record per Local Education Agency with the percent of students (a)
More information2013-2014 SCHOOL YEAR
2013-2014 SCHOOL YEAR Virginia s accountability system supports teaching and learning by setting rigorous academic standards known as the Standards of Learning (SOL) and through annual assessments of student
More informationDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Funding Highlights: Provides $77.4 billion. The Budget includes a significant increase for K-12 education, while making tough choices to put the Pell Grant program on a sustainable
More informationDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Funding Highlights: Provides $77.4 billion. The Budget includes a significant increase for K-12 education, while making tough choices to put the Pell Grant program on a sustainable
More informationSupplement, Not Supplant Handbook A Guide for Grants Administered by the Texas Education Agency
Supplement, Not Supplant Handbook A Guide for Grants Administered by the Texas Education Agency 2013 THE TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY Contents Supplement, Not Supplant Handbook Introduction... 2 Definition
More informationAlabama State Board of Education PLAN 2020
Alabama State Board of Education PLAN 2020 Our Vision Every Child a Graduate Every Graduate Prepared for College/Work/Adulthood in the 21 st Century Prepared Graduate Defined Possesses the knowledge and
More informationPENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL PERFORMANCE PROFILE Frequently Asked Questions
PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL PERFORMANCE PROFILE Frequently Asked Questions Introduction The Pennsylvania School Performance Profile (SPP) is an integral part of the Educator Effectiveness System (teacher and principal
More informationNorth Carolina Testing Program
Guidelines for Testing Students Identified as Limited English Proficient Published August 2013 Public Schools of North Carolina www.ncpublicschools.org State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction
More informationStrategies to Improve Outcomes for High School English Language Learners: Implications for Federal Policy A Forum.
AYPF Forum Brief: Strategies to Improve Outcomes for High School English Language Learners 11/19/10 1 Strategies to Improve Outcomes for High School English Language Learners: Implications for Federal
More informationEvery Student Succeeds Act: A Progress Report on Elementary and Secondary Education
Every Student Succeeds Act: A Progress Report on Elementary and Secondary Education Executive Office of the President December 2015 Every Student Succeeds Act: A Progress Report on Elementary and Secondary
More informationUnited States Government Accountability Office GAO. Report to Congressional Requesters. February 2009
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters February 2009 ACCESS TO ARTS EDUCATION Inclusion of Additional Questions in Education s Planned Research Would Help
More informationFrequently Asked Questions. The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)
Frequently Asked Questions The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) Table of Contents What are the major requirements of NCLB? page 7 Does NCLB federalize education? 7 How many states are currently in compliance
More informationSUMMARY OF THE EVERY STUDENT SUCCEEDS ACT, LEGISLATION REAUTHORIZING THE ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT
SUMMARY OF THE EVERY STUDENT SUCCEEDS ACT, LEGISLATION REAUTHORIZING THE ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT Legislative History A conference committee met on November 18 and 19 to resolve the differences
More informationThe Wyoming School District Assessment System
CHAPTER 6 SCHOOL ACCREDITATION Section 1. Authority. These rules and regulations are promulgated pursuant to the Wyoming Education Code of 1969 (as amended-1999)(w.s. 21-2-304 (a)(i) and (ii)). Section
More informationImplementing Title I in Georgia Schools
Implementing Title I in Georgia Schools A Handbook for Title I Directors For additional information regarding this handbook contact: Office of School Improvement Federal Programs Division 1858 Twin Towers
More informationUTAH. ESEA Flexibility Request
UTAH ESEA Flexibility Request 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS PAGE Cover Sheet for ESEA Flexibility Request 4 Waivers 5 Assurances 6 Consultation 8 Evaluation 13 Overview of SEA s ESEA Flexibility Request
More informationMO DEPT ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION SCHOOL YEAR: 2009-2010 DISTRICT: 061-150 ATLANTA C-3 BUILDING: 4020 ATLANTA ELEM.
Run Date: 04-21-2010 Run Time: 11:09:35 Submitted Not Submitted Date: MO DEPT ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION EPEGS Schoolwide Program Plan SCHOOL YEAR: 2009-2010 DISTRICT: 061-150 ATLANTA C-3 BUILDING:
More informationOhio Legislative Service Commission
Ohio Legislative Service Commission Fiscal Note & Local Impact Statement Jason Phillips and other LSC staff Bill: Am. H.B. 555 of the 129th G.A. Date: December 13, 2012 Status: As Enacted Sponsor: Reps.
More informationPennsylvania School Performance Profile
Pennsylvania School Performance Profile The PA School Performance Profile serves several purposes: Provide a building level score for educators as part of the Educator Effectiveness System Provide parents
More informationServing Preschool Children Through Title I
Serving Preschool Children Through Title I Part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as Amended NON-REGULATORY GUIDANCE U. S. Department of Education u l u l u l u l u l u l u l u l
More informationApproval of Revised Michigan School Accreditation and Accountability System (MI-SAAS)
RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION LANSING MICHAEL P. FLANAGAN SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: State Board of Education Mike Flanagan, Chairman DATE:
More informationImprove programs and funding for Special Education
Improve programs and funding for Special Education The promise of a free, quality public education for all students including students with disabilities is a core principle for PSEA. PSEA supports the
More informationFulda Independent School District 505
Fulda Independent School District 505 Local World s Best Workforce Plan The World s Best Workforce Plan (state statute, section 120B.11) is a comprehensive, long-term strategic plan to support and improve
More informationFrom Cradle ToCareer Connecting American Education From Birth Through Adulthood
From Cradle ToCareer Connecting American Education From Birth Through Adulthood A Special State-Focused Supplement to Education Week's QUALITY COUNTS 2007 With Support From THE PEW CENTER ON THE STATES
More informationBUILDING CAPACITY FOR PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT
BUILDING CAPACITY FOR PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT New Jersey Department of Education Division of Student Services Regional and County Education Office Version Developed by the Office of Title I Program Planning
More informationJUST THE FACTS. El Paso, Texas
JUST THE FACTS El Paso, Texas The Institute for a Competitive Workforce (ICW) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, 501(c)(3) affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. ICW promotes the rigorous educational standards
More informationCardiff Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2010 11 School Year
Cardiff Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2010 11 School Year Published During 2011 12 Every school in California is required by state law to publish a School
More informationEvery Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) An Overview of the Every Student Succeeds Act A reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) June 28 th, 2016 Diane Douglas Superintendent of Public
More informationRace To The Top Application
Race To The Top Application Office of The Governor :: Beverly Perdue State of North Carolina :: June 2010 Table of Contents A. State Success Factors 1 A1. Articulating State s education reform agenda
More informationConnecticut s Race to the Top Phase I Application Framework
Connecticut s Race to the Top Phase I Application Framework Application Goal - Improve the educational success of all students from the preschool years through post secondary education by taking the following
More informationFederal Aid to New York State Public School Districts
Federal Aid to New York State Public School Districts 1. How much federal aid do New York State public school districts get? Federal aid is projected to be almost $3.2 billion for school year 2013 14.
More informationSchoolwide Programs (SWP)
Schoolwide Programs (SWP) Basic Facts A school is eligible if at least 40% of the students are from low-income families for the initial year of the SWP SWP programs can combine Title I with other federal,
More informationHow Eight State Education Agencies in the Northeast and Islands Region Identify and Support Low-Performing Schools and Districts.
How Eight State Education Agencies in the Northeast and Islands Region Identify and Support Low-Performing Schools and Districts New York Data-based targeted supports and monitoring of identified schools
More informationPennsylvania s Statewide System of School Support
Pennsylvania s Statewide System of School Support The Pennsylvania Department of Education s (PDE) mission is to lead and serve the educational community to enable each individual to grow into an inspired,
More information2014 Legislation Regarding A-F School Grading Formula. September 17, 2014
2014 Legislation Regarding A-F School Grading Formula September 17, 2014 2 Delays issuance of school grades from October 2014 to October 2016 Board of Education to consider a single school grade or multiple
More informationA Parent s Guide to School Accountability in Kentucky
A Parent s Guide to School Accountability in For more than 20 years, has been a national leader in P-12 education. In 2011-12, became THE leader as the first state to teach and test students on new, more
More informationSchool Levels of Support. By Dr. Kristine Harms
School Levels of Support By Dr. Kristine Harms By definition : A priority school is a school whose overall score on the School Performance Index is at/or below the 5 th percentile. The total number of
More informationCenter on Education Policy, 2007. Reading First: Locally appreciated, nationally troubled
CEP, Compendium of Major NCLB Studies Reading First Page 1 Center on Education Policy, 2007 Reading First: Locally appreciated, nationally troubled Examines the perceived effectiveness of Reading First,
More informationARIZONA SCHOOL REPORT CARD ACADEMIC YEAR 2006-07
Tom Horne, Superintendent of Public Instruction ARIZONA SCHOOL REPORT CARD ACADEMIC YEAR 26-7 AZ LEARNS1 High School Achievement Profile 25-6 24-5 23-4 Performing Performing Performing 329 N. Alma School
More informationFor Canyon View School
Executive Summary School Accountability Report Card, 200 For Canyon View School Address: 760 W. Cypress Avenue Phone: (909) 599-227 ext: 2623 Principal: John Mann Grade Span: K-2 This executive summary
More informationMigrant Education Program Evaluation Toolkit A Tool for State Migrant Directors. Summer 2012
Migrant Education Program Evaluation Toolkit A Tool for State Migrant Directors Summer 2012 Developed by the U.S. Department of Education Office of Migrant Education through a contract with The SERVE Center
More informationAgenda for Reform. Summary Briefing December 14, 2009
Summary Briefing December 14, 2009 The Vision The Board of Regents envisions a New York where all students are prepared for college, the global economy, 21 st century citizenship, and continued learning
More informationTITLE IX, PART E UNIFORM PROVISIONS SUBPART 1 PRIVATE SCHOOLS. Non-Regulatory Guidance
TITLE IX, PART E UNIFORM PROVISIONS SUBPART 1 PRIVATE SCHOOLS Equitable Services to Eligible Private School Students, Teachers, and Other Educational Personnel Non-Regulatory Guidance Office of Non-Public
More informationFor Immediate Release: Thursday, July 19, 2012 Contact: Jim Polites 860.713.6525
For Immediate Release: Thursday, July 19, 2012 Contact: Jim Polites 860.713.6525 2012 CMT, CAPT RESULTS SHOW SOME INCREASES, WHILE GAPS IN ACHIEVEMENT PERSIST The Connecticut State Department of Education
More informationAlignment effort to ensure that what teachers teach is in accord with what the curriculum says will be taught and what is assessed on official tests
Glossary of Education Terms General Terms Accountability measurable proof, usually in the form of student results on various tests, that teachers, schools, divisions and states are teaching students efficiently
More informationImpact Analysis. Rule Title: 16NCAC 06G.0504 High School Accreditation Framework
Impact Analysis Rule Title: 16NCAC 06G.0504 High School Accreditation Framework Agency: Contact: Authority: Department of Public Instruction 6301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-6301 Jeani Allen,
More informationU.S. Department of Education - EDCAPS G5-Technical Review Form (New)
U.S. Department of Education - EDCAPS G5-Technical Review Form (New) Status: Submitted Last Updated: 8/25/214 5:25 PM Technical Review Coversheet Applicant: Reader #1: ********** Success Academy Charter
More information2415.03 HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS (M)
2415.03/Page 1 of 7 2415.03 M Introduction The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001 requires all teachers be or become highly qualified in the core academic content area(s) they teach. New, newly hired
More informationData Housed at the North Carolina Education Research Data Center
Data Housed at the North Carolina Education Research Data Center District-level data Community Index Data, Year 2004 Each file has one record per Local Education Agency with the percent of students (a)
More informationAdvanced Program Information The percentage of students enrolled in advanced programs is a key indicator of school quality at the secondary level.
Virginia Department of Education P.O. Box 2120, Richmond, VA 23218 Superintendent: Dr. Steven R. Staples 1-800-292-3820 The is committed to providing a quality education for all students. The Virginia
More informationEnglish Language Learners Title III, Part A: Requirements and Allowability
English Language Learners Title III, Part A: Requirements and Allowability Bethany Nickerson, State Director for English Language Learners Office of the State Superintendent of Education (OSSE) 1 Topics
More informationMEMORANDUM. TO: CCSSO FROM: Penn Hill Group DATE: January 26, 2016 SUBJECT: State Report Card Requirements. Introduction
MEMORANDUM TO: CCSSO FROM: Penn Hill Group DATE: January 26, 2016 SUBJECT: State Report Card Requirements Introduction On December 10. 2015, President Obama signed into law the Every Student Succeeds Act
More informationCASE s ESEA REAUTHORIZATION RECOMMENDATIONS
A Division Of The Council For Exceptional Children CASE s ESEA REAUTHORIZATION RECOMMENDATIONS Offi c e : 4 7 8.3 3 3.6 8 9 2 Osi g i a n Offi c e C e n tre 1 0 1 K a te l y n C i rc l e, S u i te E Wa
More informationPROGRESS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CAREER AND COLLEGE READY GRADUATES PROGRAM
Attachment PROG 6 PROGRESS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CAREER AND COLLEGE READY GRADUATES PROGRAM A Report to the: Joint Legislative Education Oversight Committee Submitted By The State Board of Community
More informationS-4061.1 SENATE BILL 6511. State of Washington 60th Legislature 2008 Regular Session. By Senators Kastama, McAuliffe, Franklin, Rasmussen, and Oemig
S-4061.1 SENATE BILL 6511 State of Washington 60th Legislature 2008 Regular Session By Senators Kastama, McAuliffe, Franklin, Rasmussen, and Oemig Read first time 01/17/08. Referred to Committee on Economic
More informationQuestions and Answers On Highly Qualified Teachers Serving Children With Disabilities
Questions and Answers On Highly Qualified Teachers Serving Children With Disabilities January 2007 The final regulations for the reauthorized Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) were published
More informationAlliance Environmental Science and Technology High
Alliance Environmental Science and Technology High Melissa Chew, Principal Principal, Alliance Environmental Science and Technology High About Our School About Our School Environmental Science and Technology
More informationMEETING NCLB S HIGHLY QUALIFIED GUIDELINES. An NEA-AFT Publication
MEETING NCLB S HIGHLY QUALIFIED GUIDELINES An NEA-AFT Publication July 2003 AFT and NEA Leaders: AFT and NEA share a common commitment to ensuring that every student has a high quality teacher. Our organizations
More informationPOLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR ALTERNATIVE LEARNING PROGRAMS AND SCHOOLS GRADES K-12
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR ALTERNATIVE LEARNING PROGRAMS AND SCHOOLS GRADES K-12 Adopted September 2003 Updated August 2014 North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Safe & Healthy Schools Support
More informationThe Historic Opportunity to Get College Readiness Right: The Race to the Top Fund and Postsecondary Education
The Historic Opportunity to Get College Readiness Right: The Race to the Top Fund and Postsecondary Education Passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) and the creation of the Race to
More informationDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Funding Highlights: Provides $68.6 billion in discretionary funding for the Department of Education to build upon investments in preschool access, ongoing K-12 reforms, and efforts
More informationTestimony to the Tennessee Senate Education Committee in Support of. of the Common Core State Standards.
Testimony to the Tennessee Senate Education Committee in Support of The Common Core State Standards Patricia Levesque, Chief Executive Officer, Foundation for Excellence in Education September 20, 2013
More informationPerformance Management
Performance Management Setting Outcomes and Strategies to Improve Student Achievement February 2014 Reforms of the size and scale to which Race to the Top States have committed, require unprecedented planning,
More informationELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT Comparison of the No Child Left Behind Act to the Every Student Succeeds Act Congress passed the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) 1 to replace the No Child Left
More informationGovernor Snyder s FY2016 Education & School Aid Budget Recommendations
Governor Snyder s FY2016 Education & School Aid Budget Recommendations February 23, 2015 The annual budget is the single most powerful expression of the state s priorities. It is during the budget process
More informationESEA Reauthorization Update 113 th Congress
ESEA Reauthorization Update 113 th Congress Status H.R.5 Latest Title: Student Success Act Sponsor: Rep Kline, John [MN-2] (introduced 6/6/2013) Cosponsors (12) Latest Major Action: 6/19/2013. Ordered
More information