How To Write An Electronic Messaging Retention Policy In California



Similar documents
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS POLICY. ELECTRONIC MEDIA AND USE POLICY A-50 1 of 9

Board of County Commissioners Leon County, Florida

State of Michigan Records Management Services. Frequently Asked Questions About E mail Retention

Practical tips for managing e mail

Rules, Policy and Industrial Relations Committee/Committee of the Whole Meeting of September 12, 2008

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS RECORD MANAGEMENT, RETENTION AND DISPOSITION POLICY

Electronic Records Management Guidelines

Brent R. Holladay Chief Deputy, Information Resources Lake County Clerk of Courts

PINAL COUNTY POLICY AND PROCEDURE 2.50 ELECTRONIC MAIL AND SCHEDULING SYSTEM

RETENTION BEST PRACTICE. Issue Date: April 20, Intent and Purpose:

Best Practices Series Document Retention and Best Practices

HAVERFORD COLLEGE IITS: POLICY AND PLANNING

COLORADO COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM SYSTEM PRESIDENT S PROCEDURE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT AND RETENTION PROCEDURES

RECORDS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND RETENTION

How To Preserve Records In Mississippi

Electronic Data Retention and Preservation Policy 1

E-Discovery Toolkit for Educational Institutions

Village of Hastings-on-Hudson Electronic Policy. Internal and External Policies and Procedures

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. Revised January 15, 2014

Preservation and Production of Electronic Records

EFFECTIVE DATE: JULY 1, 2010

CITY OF ANDERSON ELECTRONIC RECORD RETENTION POLICY

Records Management Electronic Records and Electronic Discovery

City of Prescott Data Integrity Policy

West Chester University Records Management Policy

Discovery Technology Group

How To Maintain School District Records

The E-Discovery Process

Department of Veterans Affairs VA Directive 6311 VA E-DISCOVERY

These guidelines apply to state and local government agencies in the State of New Jersey.

Electronic Messaging Appropriate Use Policy

State of New Jersey Circular Letter ST: Managing Electronic Mail: Guidelines and Best Practices

COMMISSION OF PUBLIC RECORDS NEW MEXICO STATE RECORDS CENTER AND ARCHIVES

Ogden City. What HAS and has NOT worked for us in making policies...

Code - A Date Approved: July 24/01

REED COLLEGE. ediscovery GUIDELINES FOR PRESERVATION AND PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS

STATE OF WYOMING Electronic Mail Policy

SECURITY and MANAGEMENT CONTROL OUTSOURCING STANDARD For NON-CHANNELERS

Records and Information Management and Retention

LEHMAN COLLEGE: DEPARTMENTAL RETENTION SCHEDULE 8/7/2014 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT)

University of Louisiana System

Prosecuting Attorneys Council of Georgia

Policy. Government of Newfoundland and Labrador (GNL)

Guidelines. Managing Records. Office of the Secretary of State. Approved and Recommended by the State Records Commission February 22, 2001

BEST PRACTICES FOR MANAGEMENT OF LOTUS NOTES RECORDS September 4, 2003

Management: A Guide For Harvard Administrators

GENERAL RETENTION SCHEDULE for WASHINGTON S COMMUNITY and TECHNICAL COLLEGE SYSTEM

RUTGERS POLICY. Approval Authority: Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs and Senior Vice President for Administration

ELECTRONIC MAIL FOR STATE AGENCIES A Guideline of the Utah State Archives and Records Service

Presented by Vickie Swam, Director of University Compliance. Records Management is one of the functions supported by the University Compliance Office.

Archiving: the definitive checklist - 33 crucial questions you must get answered before selecting a solution.

SUTLEJ TEXTILES AND INDUSTRIES LIMITED DOCUMENT PRESERVATION AND RETENTION POLICY

HCAOG Records Retention Policies & Procedures

LEGAL HOLD OBLIGATIONS FOR DISTRICT EMPLOYEES

CUNY SCHOOL OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES: DEPARTMENTAL RETENTION SCHEDULE 4/7/2014 OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Chapter RECORDS MANAGEMENT Sections:

RECORD RETENTION & DESTRUCTION POLICY

10 Steps to Establishing an Effective Retention Policy

GENERAL RETENTION SCHEDULE #19 PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS INTRODUCTION

Arizona State Library, Archives and Public Records

Rackspace Archiving Compliance Overview

TheHow and Why of Having a Successful Home Office

PRESERVATION AND PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS

Management & Retention

Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario Records Management Policy

Sub. H.B. 9 * 126th General Assembly (As Reported by H. Civil and Commercial Law)

Electronic Record Management Guidelines for Arkansas State Government. Developed by the Arkansas Records Retention Workgroup

MSU Guidance for Electronic Mail Records

UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE MEMORANDUM. SECTION: Information Services NUMBER: 07.A.07

Massachusetts Statewide Records Retention Schedule August 2014 Supplement

Table of Contents. Chapter No. 1. Introduction Objective Use Compliance Definitions Roles and Responsibilities 2

University of Wisconsin System Information Technology Records

Government records findings--recognition of public policy.

Electronic Business Communication and University Records ( , Chat and Text) UW- Madison Employee Guidance to. UW-Madison Record Management

Records Management Policy

How To Preserve A School Record

Why should the CSU have a records/information retention and disposition policy?

Chapter WAC PRESERVATION OF ELECTRONIC PUBLIC RECORDS

FARMINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2410

Solution Brief. Archiving from Office 365 for Compliance and ediscovery. 1) Capture Everything

Appendix G District Policies and Procedures

FDU - Records Retention policy Final.docx

Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,

CITY OF MONTEREY. Citywide Records Management Policy And Records Retention Schedule. June 2005 Amended November 2005 & June 19, 2007

ediscovery: The New Information Management Battleground Developments in the Law and Best Practices

Records Management Policy

Data Management Policies. Sage ERP Online

BRIDGEVALLEY COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE OPERATING POLICY

Electronic Records Management Guidelines

Does not differentiate among media. The content of the message determines whether the message is a record.

RECORDS MANAGEMENT POLICY

39C-1 Records Management Program 39C-3

State of Montana Guidelines

How To Answer A Question About Your Organization'S History Of Esi

RECORDS MANAGEMENT POLICY

C. All responses should reflect an inquiry into actual employee practices, and not just the organization s policies.

CHAPTER 46 RULES OF THE BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF SHORTHAND REPORTERS

Southern Law Center Law Center Policy #IT0004. Title: Policy

SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT

Transcription:

THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS ACTION AGENDA SUMMARY " DEPT: Chief Executive Office BOARD AGENDA # *B-5 Urgent Routine @o AGENDA DATE October 21,2008 CEO Concurs with Recommendation YES 415 Vote Required YES NO @ (Infor SUBJECT: Approval of Electronic Messaging Retention Policy tion Attached) -- STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Approve the Electronic Messaging Retention Policy. 2. Direct departments that maintain their own electronic messaging systems to implement their departmental retention schedules and to provide them in written form to the County Chief Information Officer by December 31,2008. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact directly related to this proposed Policy. Departments may see a modest reduction in storage costs and system administration costs depending on what retention schedule they set, as permitted under this proposed Policy.... BOARD ACTION AS FOLLOWS: NO. 2008-71 4 ATTEST: E L I ~ T A. H KING, ~ssista&rk File No.

Approval of Electronic Messaging Retention Policy DISCUSSION: This proposed Policy (attached) would provide guidance for departments on the appropriate maximum retention period for certain electronic correspondence, while still allowing those departments to set their own retention periods within that specified maximum, based on departmental practice, storage requirements and business requirements. This Policy would also clearly delineate the existing requirements to store correspondence designated as a Public Record and provide direction as to their treatment. Emails and lnstant Messages (IM) are a wide-spread way for organizations such as Stanislaus County to communicate directly, both with internal staff and externally to the public and partner agencies. There are in excess of 4,000 user accounts in the various systems deployed within Stanislaus County. Today, twelve County departments maintain their own email systems. These departments are as follows: the Sheriffs Department, District Attorney's office, Probation Department, Health Services Agency, Community Services Agency, Behavioral Health and Recovery Services, Alliance WorkNet, Child Support Services, Library, Environmental Resources, Public Works and Strategic Business Technology. Tracking, storing, and when necessary, producing copies of emails and IM can be a time-consuming and expensive endeavor. There are legal requirements regarding maintaining Public Records. Statutory retention periods differ, however, the County has the same mandate to keep a record that arrives via email as one that arrives via the Postal Service. The proposed Electronic Messaging Policy sets a maximum retention period for all County emails and IMs of 24 months. Where the email is required to be treated as a Public Record, the Policy requires that it be moved from the email system, by either printing it and filing as usual or saving to an electronic file system where it can be referenced and provided as necessary. The Policy allows each department that maintains a separate email and/or lnstant Messaging system (collectively referred to as "Electronic Messaging Systems") to set their own retention period providing that it does not exceed the maximum 24 months. Each of those departments will document their retention schedule and keep a copy of that document on file with the Chief lnformation Officer. The Electronic Messaging Policy will become effective upon approval of the Board of Supervisors and county departments have until December 3Ist, 2008 to implement their own retention schedules and to document that schedule. This Policy is in keeping with the Tape Destruction Policy approved by the Board of Supervisors on May 6,2008. This effort will streamline efforts to manage electronic messages and give a clear direction to County lnformation Technology staff, allowing them to make better use of their time and of limited storage space. Page 2

Approval of Electronic Messaging Retention Policy POLICY ISSUES: The Board of Supervisors is asked to consider whether the proposed Policy will provide for the more effective use of County resources and promote the efficient delivery of public services. STAFFING IMPACT: There is no staffing impact associated with this item. Page 3

1 I STANISLAUS COUNTY ELECTRONIC MESSAGING RETENTION POLICY OCTOBER 2008 Purpose This policy covers retention periods for electronic mail ("email") as well as instant messaging. Use of the term "email" throughout this document should he understood to include all email item types, including email and calendar items in the email system. The position of Stanislaus County is that electronic correspondence should be retained for the minimum amount of time required by the business need and should then he immediately cleaned from all information technology ("IT") systems except where the content of the email or instant message could he considered public record or where legal proceedings dictate that electronic correspondence shall be retained for a longer duration. Records The definition of public records includes any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the public's business prepared, owned, used or retained by the County. The definition includes electronic records, including e-mail, voicemail or fax messages sent to the same mailbox. The definition does not include preliminary drafts, notes, or interagency or intra-agency memoranda that are not retained by the County in the ordinary course of business. Personal correspondence and interdepartmental and intradepartmental messages should routinely be deleted unless either the sender or the recipient would have retained the writing had it been sent in any other form. Messages received from outside the County should be retained by the recipient if he or she would have retained the document if it had been sent in any other form. Employees have the same responsibilities for their mailbox messages as they do for any other public record, and must distinguish between records and non-record information. Electronic Messages This policy defines electronic messages as all typical, routine business correspondence such as messages, calendar events, tasks, etcetera generated by or stored within email and instant messaging systems. Electronic messages are non-vital and should be discarded routinely. Nonrecord messages make up the vast majority of all electronic messages and as such shall be permanently deleted during the defined retention period. Retention A11 non-record electronic messages shall be deleted and purged, both from the electronic messaging system as well as any other form of electronic storage such as tape and other archiving methods or systems within two years (24 months) of creation on County messaging systems or receipt on County messaging systems, whichever is later. The retention period for record messages is determined by the content of the message. Record messages may be deleted upon expiation of the statutory retention period (or after two years if there is no statutory retention period) upon authorization of the Board of Supervisors pursuant to Government Code section 26202. When in doubt about the legally appropriate retention period, consult the County Counsels office. Electronic Messaging Policy - 1 -

STANISLAUS COUNTY ELECTRONIC MESSAGING RETENTION POLICY OCTOBER 2008 Precedence This policy does not supersede or override any regulations promulgated by State or Federal agencies that are more stringent or impose additional requirements than this policy. Non-Compliance All County Departments who maintain their own electronic messaging systems are responsible for developing their specific electronic message retention periods in compliance with this document. Retention periods shorter than 24 months are permitted but no electronic message retention period shall exceed 24 months as described under "Retention." All Departments who maintain email systems shall ensure that their systems can and do comply with the provisions of this policy. Department Heads are responsible for implementing this policy. Departments must maintain a copy of their current Retention Policy on file with the County Chief Information Officer. County staff are required to comply with all provisions of this policy and those adopted by their Department Head governing retention of electronic correspondence. Any attempt to purposefully circumvent this policy, by, for example, forwarding emails to oneself to artificially extend the retention period of an email will be seen as violations of this policy. Systems Covered By This Policy This policy covers all email and instant messaging systems internal to County, as well as non- County email and instant messaging systems used to access County electronic correspondence, cellular "smartphones" capable of storing or processing email or instant messages, personal digital assistants (" PDAs") and any other electronic device that can store andlor display email or instant messages. This policy also extends to any storage medium (hard drives, flash drives, backup tapes, etc) that could be used to store County email or instant messages. Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the end-user of such devices to ensure that this policy is effected on those devices. Any email generated or processed by automated systems should not be retained and should be purged as soon as practicable. Records of electronic messages will be retained by each Department, either online or on secondary storage such as tapes or DVDs, separate from all other County data. Reasonable steps should be taken to ensure that the data will not be recoverable after that retention period. Legal Proceedings Regardless of retention requirements, e-mail, instant messages and all other electronic or paper documents pertaining to threatened or actual legal proceedings must be retained until the litigation is finally concluded. When notified by County Counsel that certain emails or instant Electronic Messaging Policy - 2 -

STANISLAUS COUNTY ELECTRONIC MESSAGING RETENTION POLICY OCTOBER 2008 messages are required for legal proceedings, that correspondence shall be forwarded to an email account on the SBT-hosted email systems configured to support a longer retention period. County Email and Non-County Systems Electronic messaging, by design, permits communication between County and non-county IT systems. Due to the County interest in maintaining control over County electronic messages, it is necessary to stipulate some restrictions on including non-county IT systems such as other email and instant messaging service providers in this policy. Staff shall not manually or automatically forward their County mail to non-county email or instant messaging systems for the purpose of reviewing or retaining the correspondence outside of the County. Examples of this prohibited behavior include routinely forwarding emails to a personal account provided by a private email service provider such as Hotmail or Google Gmail, as well as Carbon Copying or Blind Copying mails to email accounts outside of the County strictly for the purpose of circumventing this policy. Staff are responsible for ensuring that any County email that exists on their personal accounts (e.g. on non-county IT systems) is cleansed fiom that system to correspond with the County's retention period. Since service provider retention policies are typically beyond the control of their customers, use of these non-county systems for County electronic correspondence is discouraged. When one of the necessary and intended parties of the correspondence uses such a system, this is naturally unavoidable. Electronic Messaging Policy