What s new with GEF5?



Similar documents
4 Project Implementation and Monitoring

Module 6: Financial Resource Mobilization for NBSAPs

International environmental governance. Bali Strategic Plan for Technology Support and Capacity-building

Evaluation of the Expansion of the GEF Partnership Concept Note

July 7, 2009 DESIGN DOCUMENT FOR THE FOREST INVESTMENT PROGRAM, A TARGETED PROGRAM UNDER THE SCF TRUST FUND

REPORT OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES ON ITS SEVENTH SESSION, HELD AT MARRAKESH FROM 29 OCTOBER TO 10 NOVEMBER 2001 Addendum

Report of the Conference of the Parties on its nineteenth session, held in Warsaw from 11 to 23 November 2013

Advancing the Nagoya Protocol in Countries of the Caribbean Region -Status of Project Preparation-

SUB-STUDY ON RESULTS BASED MANAGEMENT IN GEF

REDD+ in the UN Climate Regime. Prof. Dr. Christina Voigt International Climate Change and Energy Law

JOINT WORK PROGRAM FOR THE LEAST DEVELOPED COUNTRIES FUND AND SPECIAL CLIMATE CHANGE FUND. GEF/LDCF.SCCF.19/04 September 28, 2015

GEF/LDCF.SCCF.17/05/Rev.01 October 15, th LDCF/SCCF Council Meeting October 30, 2014 Washington, DC. Agenda Item 5

Status Report on the Operations Manual and Appraisal Toolkit

Ecosystem Services and Convention on Biological Diversity How ecosystem services are reflected in the CBD COP Decisions in Nagoya?

1. What is a biodiversity offset?

Code of Conduct and Best Practice for Access and Benefit Sharing

Biological Diversity and Tourism: Development of Guidelines for Sustainable Tourism in Vulnerable Ecosystems

UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME. Environment for Development

Ref.: SCBD/BS/CG/MPM/DA/ February 2015 N O T I F I C A T I O N

Global Environment Facility GEF OPERATIONAL PROGRAM #13 ON CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABLE USE OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IMPORTANT TO AGRICULTURE

The current institutional and legal context for biodiversity conservation and management is characterised by the following features:

Version 2 of 10 December 2015 at 21:00 DRAFT PARIS OUTCOME 1. Proposal by the President. Draft decision -/CP.21

Projects that promote the conservation and/or sustainable use of endemic species. 3

IMPLEMENTATION OF ABS REGULATIONS IN VIETNAM

National Report to the Fifth Session of the United Nations Forum on Forests TURKEY

ABS-Management Tool. Best Practice Standard

Programme of Work on Protected Areas

Decisions of the Board Eighth Meeting of the Board, October 2014

Resolution XII.13. Wetlands and disaster risk reduction

Status Report on the Operations Manual and Appraisal Toolkit

Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention

International Land and Forest Tenure Facility

Further Development of the Initial Investment Framework: Sub-Criteria and Methodology

United States-Peru Environmental Cooperation Work Program

Position of the International Indigenous Peoples Forum on Climate Change (IIPFCC)* on current Climate Change negotiations. Bonn, Germany, June 2010

CHAPTER 7 TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO TRADE. Article 7.1. Definitions. Article 7.2. Objectives

Monitoring for Conservation Planning and Management. Environmental Evaluators Forum EPA Headquarters, USA June 14 15, 2007

The United Nations Environment Programme and the 2030 Agenda. Global Action for People and the Planet

Diversity of Cultural Expressions INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE FOR THE PROTECTION AND PROMOTION OF THE DIVERSITY OF CULTURAL EXPRESSIONS

SFI INC. LAUNCHES NEW STANDARD LEADS FOREST CERTIFICATION FORWARD

Annex II MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN

VIENNA RESOLUTION 4 CONSERVING AND ENHANCING FOREST BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IN EUROPE

Indigenous Peoples & Biodiversity Governance

The common fund-raising strategy

Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. English - Or.

U.S. Submission on Elements of the 2015 Agreement Introduction

Assessment of Institutions Accredited by Other Relevant Funds and Their Potential for Fast-track Accreditation

Brief on Climate Change Finance

Draft conclusions proposed by the Chair. Recommendation of the Subsidiary Body for Implementation

Legal and Formal Arrangements with Accredited Entities

Framework Convention on Climate Change

Views from Living Marine Resources Management and the Coral Triangle Project

WHO Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel

Ref.: SCBD/MPO/AF/CR/ August 2015 N O T I F I C A T I O N. Preparation for the United Nations Sustainable Development Summit 2015

Ramsar COP8 DOC. 18 Information Paper English only

FCCC/TP/2013/5. United Nations. Technical synthesis on the framework for various approaches. Technical paper. Summary. Distr.: General 22 October 2013

How To Be Sustainable With Tourism

The Copenhagen Decisions. Submission on the outcome of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long Term Cooperative Action under the Convention under item 3

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [without reference to a Main Committee (A/65/L.78)] 65/281. Review of the Human Rights Council

Evaluation. Evaluation Document 2006, No. 1. Office GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY. The GEF Monitoring and. Evaluation. Policy

Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council* 16/21 Review of the work and functioning of the Human Rights Council

GUIDELINES ON COMPLIANCE WITH AND ENFORCEMENT OF MULTILATERAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS

Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF)

REPORT OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES ON ITS SEVENTH SESSION, HELD AT MARRAKESH FROM 29 OCTOBER TO 10 NOVEMBER 2001 Addendum

Evaluation Policy. Evaluation Office. United Nations Environment Programme. September Evaluation Office. United Nations Environment Programme

REPORT OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES ON ITS FIRST SESSION, HELD AT BERLIN FROM 28 MARCH TO 7 APRIL Addendum

Advance unedited version. Decision -/CMP.3. Further guidance relating to the clean development mechanism

Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals

Transcription:

What s new with GEF5? 1. GEF-5 replenishment 2. Enhancing country ownership 3. Improving the effectiveness of the partnership Accountability to the Conventions Program and project cycle simplification 4. Updated GEF-5 Biodiversity Strategy

1. GEF-5 Duration: July 2010 to June 2014 (4 years) Amount: US$ 4.34 billion (Increase of GEF-4 contributions by more than 50%) Other funds: LDCF, SCCF, Adaptation Fund Biodiversity: US$1.2 billion in the STAR ($941 million in GEF4 +29%)

2. Enhancing country ownership Reforming the Country Support Program National Portfolio Formulation Process Direct Access for National Communications Allocation system: from RAF to STAR

3. Improving the effectiveness and efficiency of the partnership Enhancing Accountability to the Conventions Streamlining the Project Cycle and Refining the Programmatic Approach Implementing the Results-based Management Framework. Cooperation with Civil Society Organizations

4. Updating the GEF-5 Strategy Following Decision CBD COP-IX/31, The GEF-4 strategy served as a starting point, The GEF-5 Strategy builed on the 4-yr Programme Priorities 2010-2014. Sustainable Forest Management/REDD+ Program reflectingthe guidance from all conventions $1 m of incentivefor each $3 m from at least 2 focal areas

GEF5 Biodiversity Strategy ImproveSustainabilityof ProtectedArea Systems (COP Programme priority1, 2 & 4) 1.1: Improvedmanagement effectivenessof existing and new protected areas. 1.2: Increased revenue for protected area systems to meet total expenditures required for management.

Mainstream Biodiversity, Conservation and Sustainable Use into Production Landscapes, Seascapes and Sectors (COP Priority 2, 3 & 6) 2.1: Increasein sustainablymanagedlandscapesand seascapes that integrate biodiversity conservation 2.2: Measures to conserve and sustainablyuse biodiversity incorporated in policy and regulatory frameworks. 2.3: Improvedmanagement frameworksto prevent, control and manage invasive alien species

Build Capacity for the Implementation of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CPB) COP Priority 4 Potential risks of living modified organisms to biodiversity are identified and evaluated in a scientifically sound and transparent manner All remaining eligible countries (about 60-70) have national biosafety decision-making systems in place.

Build Capacity on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing COP Priority 5 Legal and regulatory frameworks, and administrative procedures established that enable access to genetic resources and benefit sharing in accordance with the CBD provisions Access and benefit-sharing agreements (number) that recognize the core ABS principles of Prior Informed Consent (PIC) and Mutually Agreed Terms (MAT) including the fair and equitable sharing of benefits.

Integrate CBD Obligations into National Planning Processes through Enabling Activities COP Priority 4 Development and sectoral planning frameworks at country level integrate measurable biodiversity conservation and sustainable use targets. Nb and type of development and sectoral planning frameworks that include measurable biodiversity conservation and sustainable use targets.

So, What s new with GEF5? GEF replenishment = US$4.34 b Priority policy recommendations Enhancing Country ownership Country Support program Direct access for Communications National Portfolio Formulation Exercise(NPFE) STAR for 3 focal areas Improving the effectiveness of the partnership Accountability to the Conventions Program and project cycle simplification GEF5 BiodiversityStrategyincorporatesall of COP 9 Guidance and the programmepriorities framework identified at COP 9.

Broadening the GEF Partnership under Paragraph 28 of the GEF Instrument Paragraph 28 of the GEF Instrument reads as follows: The Secretariat and the Implementing Agencies under the guidance of the Council shall cooperate with other international organizations to promote achievement of the purposes of the GEF. The Implementing Agencies may make arrangements for GEF project preparation and execution by multilateral development banks, specialized agencies and program of the United Nations, other international organizations, bilateral development agencies, national institutions, non-governmental organizations, private sector entities and academic institutions, taking into account their comparative advantage in efficient and cost-effective project execution. Such arrangements shall be made in accordance with national priorities. Pursuant to paragraph 20 (f), the Council may request the Secretariat to make similar arrangements in accordance with national priorities.

Improving the Effectiveness & Efficiency of the GEF Network Implementation of Paragraph 28 of GEF Instrument (proposal for November 2010 Council meeting) Direct access for more agencies, including qualified national entities, to GEF resources Implementation of the Results-Based Management (proposal for November 2010 Council meeting) Enhancing cooperation with civil society organizations (proposal for November 2010 Council meeting) Online Program Management Information System (PMIS) with access to ALL information about project processing and approval

Proposal on Broadening the GEF Partnership Secretariat consulted with: a Six Member Council Subcommittee, the GEF Trustee, and three member Task Force of Experts to develop a revised proposal. Two types of agencies will be eligible to receive GEF resources directly for the development and implementation of projects Current 10 GEF Agencies GEF Partner Agencies Three Stage Accreditation Procedure: Stage 1: Value-added Review Stage 2: Accreditation Panel Review Stage 3: Conclusion of MOU and FPA State. New Agencies accredited under para. 28 : GEF Project Agencies 14

Proposal on Broadening the GEF Partnership Proposed Requirements and Eligibility Criteria for Accreditation: - Applications require the endorsement of at least one OFP - Applicants needs to meet all the GEF fiduciary standards and two core environmental and social safeguard standards (environmental assessment and natural habitats). - Pay an accreditation fee - Applicants needs to meet all the GEF fiduciary standards and two core environmental and social safeguard standards (environmental assessment and natural habitats). - Only implement projects in countries and/or regions where they have presence. Proposal to accredit up to 10 new Project Agencies during GEF-5 - Priority to accredit national Institutions at least 5 during GEF-5. - Up to 5 other types of agencies: Nongovernmental Organizations, international organizations (regional organizations, UN agencies and programs, other international organizations), and bilateral development agencies. Recommendation that Secretariat form an Accreditation Panel, develop procedures manual, and start to receive applications when ready. An evaluation on the outcome of this reform will be conducted two years after the first five new GEF Project Agencies have been accredited. 15